Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T17:53:47.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery Complications Causing Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2017

Edited by
David K. Stevenson ,
William E. Benitz ,
Philip Sunshine ,
Susan R. Hintz  and
Maurice L. Druzin
David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury , pp. 67 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

World Health Organization. Prevention of perinatal morbidity. In Public Health Papers 42. Geneva: WHO, 1969.Google Scholar
Nelson, KB, Ellenberg, JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy: multivariate analysis of risk. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 81–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, et al. Births: Final Data for 2013. National Vital Statistic Reports, vol. 64, no. 1. Hyattsvill, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2015.Google Scholar
Spong, CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 404–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooper, RK, Goldenberg, RL, Creasy, RK, et al. A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, TB, Hoekstra, RE, Couser, RS, et al. Survival and follow-up of infants born at 23–26 weeks’ gestational age: effects of surfactant therapy. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, M, Fanaroff, AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birth weight and gestational age in the 1990s. Early Hum Dev 1999; 53: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, AJ, Quaedackers, JS, Guan, J, et al. The premature fetus: not as defenseless as we thought, but still paradoxically vulnerable? Dev Neurosci 2001; 23: 175–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedrick, J, Anderson, ABM. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Secretary’s Task Force on Black and Minority Health (Publication 0-487-637 [QL3]), vol. 6: Infant Mortality and Low Birth Weight. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1985.Google Scholar
Bakketeig, LS, Hoffman, HJ. Epidemiology of preterm birth: results from longitudinal study of births in Norway. In Elder, MG, Dendricks, CH, eds., Preterm Labour. London: Butterworths, 1981: 17–46.Google Scholar
Abrams, B, Newman, V, Key, T, et al. Maternal weight gain and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 577–83.Google ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, SW, Keith, LG, Chasnoff, IJ, et al. Cocaine use during pregnancy: adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 57: 686–90.Google Scholar
Shiono, PH, Klebanoff, MA, Rhoads, GG. Smoking and drinking during pregnancy. JAMA 1986; 255: 82–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keirse, M, Rush, R, Anderson, A, et al. Risk of pre-term delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 81–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, S, Schoenbaum, S, Monson, R, et al. The relationship between induced abortion and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 136–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, Minich, N, et al. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Back, SA, Rivkees, SA. Emerging concepts in periventricular white matter injury. Semin Perinatol 2004; 28: 405–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leviton, A, Paneth, N. White matter damage in preterm newborns: an epidemiologic perspective. Early Hum Dev 1990; 24: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, RD, Bennet, L, Davidson, J, et al. Destruction and reconstruction: hypoxia and the developing brain. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2007; 81: 163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meis, PJ, MacErnest, J, Moore, ML. Causes of low birth weight births in public and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1165–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Unrecognized amnionitis and prematurity: a preliminary report. J Reprod Med 1977; 19: 8–12.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Amniotic fluid analysis: its role in maternal and neonatal infection. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 51: 56–62.Google Scholar
Leigh, J, Garite, TJM. Amnionitis and the management of premature labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 500–6.Google Scholar
Gravett, MG, Hummel, D, Eschenbach, DA, et al. Preterm labor associated with subclinical amniotic infection and with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameed, C, Teiane, N, Verma, UL, et al. Silent chorioamnionitis as a cause of preterm labor refractory to tocolytic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 726–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duff, P, Kopelman, JN. Subclinical intraamniotic infection in asymptomatic patients with refractory preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 756–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaltreider, DF, Kohl, S. Epidemiology of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J, Garite, TJ. Premature rupture of membranes before fetal viability. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 615–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Mead, PB. Management of the patient with premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Perinatol 1980; 7: 243–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, KA, Clark, SL. Premature rupture of the membranes: management controversies. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 385–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Artal, JP, Sokol, RJ, Newman, M, et al. The mechanical properties of prematurely and non-prematurely ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125: 655–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavery, JP, Miller, CE, Knight, RD. The effect of labor on the rheologic response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 87–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Naeye, RL. Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 93–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Lonky, NN, Hayashi, RH. A proposed mechanism for premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1988; 43: 22–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkoff, H, Grunebaum, AN, Schwarz, RH, et al. Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes: a prospective study of vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 965–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD, McGregor, JA. Cervicovaginal microflora and pregnancy outcome: results of a double blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythromycin treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1580–91.Google Scholar
Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK, Linzy, EM, et al. Prospective randomized study of corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of membranes and the premature gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 508–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, St Clair, PJ, et al. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from patients with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoder, PR, Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, et al. A prospective controlled study of maternal and perinatal outcome after intra-amniotic infection at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 695–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK. Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 54: 539–45.Google Scholar
Gabbe, SG, Ettinger, BB, Freeman, RK, et al. Umbilical cord compression associated with amniotomy: laboratory observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 353–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, JC, Levy, DC, Wilds, PL. Premature rupture of membranes prior to term: consquences of non-intervention. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 601–6.Google Scholar
Morretti, M, Sibai, BM. Maternal and perinatal outcome of expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in the mid-trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 390–6.Google Scholar
Major, CA, Kitzmiller, JL. Perinatal survival with expectant management of mid-trimester rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 838–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, W, Pohlandt, F, Grab, D, et al. Acute respiratory failure and short-term outcome after premature rupture of the membranes and oligohydramnios before 20 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr 2002; 140(2): 177–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resch, B, Resch, E, Maurer-Fellbaum, U, et al. The whole spectrum of cystic periventricular leukomalacia of the preterm infant: results from a large consecutive case series. Childs Nerv Syst 2015; 31(9):1527–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekin, A, Gezer, C, Taner, CY, et al. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 449–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 254–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zemlyn, S. The length of the uterine cervix and its significance. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 267–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, RLO. Incidence of preterm delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. S Afr Med J 1979; 56: 1085–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Rust, OA, Atlas, RO, Jones, KJ, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 830–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berghella, V, Odibo, AO, Tolosa, JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1311–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
To, MS, Alfirevic, Z, Heath, VCF, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1849–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1106–12.Google Scholar
Owen, J, Hankins, G, Iams, JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(375): e1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Eng J Med 2003; 384: 2379–85.Google Scholar
Althuisius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 907–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Vidyadhari, D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 18–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbst, AL, Hubby, MM, Blough, RR, et al. A comparison of pregnancy experiment in DES-exposed and DES-unexposed daughters. J Reprod Med 1980; 24: 62–9.Google Scholar
Kaufman, RH, Noller, K, Adam, E, et al. Upper genital tract abnormalities and pregnancy outcome in diethylstilbestrol-exposed progeny. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 148: 973–84.Google Scholar
Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Mercer, BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1035–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papiernik, E, Kaminski, M. Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 1974; 2: 30–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, C, Smith, R, Steinhoff, P, et al. Induced abortion and spontaneous fetal loss in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 548–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1982, vol. 1: Natality. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health, 1986.Google Scholar
Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA, Crowther, CA, et al. Preterm labor in twin pregnancies: prediction by cervical assessment. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 719–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Clinic Summary Report: All SART Member Clinics. Available at www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0.Google Scholar
Elliot, JP. High order multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol 2005; 5: 305–11.Google Scholar
Dunietz, GL, Holzman, C, McKane, P, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas. Fertil Steril, 2015; 103(4): 974–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit. Assisted Conception in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: AIHW, 1992.Google Scholar
Williams, MA, Millendorf, R, Liererman, E, et al. Adverse infant outcomes associated with first trimester vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 14–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwlth 1970; 77: 492–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peaceman, AM, Andrews, WW, Thorp, JM, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, BM, Arheart, KL. Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 1995; 346: 1271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, Thurnau, GR, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 989–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usher, R. Changing mortality rates with perinatal intensive care and regionalization. Semin Perinatol 1977; 1: 309–19Google ScholarPubMed
Gortmaker, S, Sobol, A, Clark, C, et al. The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, W, Ford, G, Orgill, A, et al. Outcome in infants with birth weight 500–999 grams: a regional study of 1979 and 1980 births. J Pediatr 1984; 104: 921–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Carpenter, RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of fetal length in addition to head and abdominal measurements. Radiology 1984; 152: 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeds, JW, Cefalo, RL, Bowes, WA. Femur lengths in the estimation of fetal weight less than 1500 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 233–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institutes of Health. Consensus Statement: Effect of Antenatal Steroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes. Bethesda, MD: NIH, 1994: 1–24.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. Committee Opinion No. 677. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e187–94.Google Scholar
Rouse, D, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constantine, MM, Weiner, SJ. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 354–64.Google Scholar
Little, WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labors, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Trans Obstet Soc Lond 1862; 2: 293–344.Google Scholar
Freud, S. Die infantile Cerebrallähmung. Vienna: Hölder, 1897.Google Scholar
Blair, E, Stanley, FJ. Intrapartum asphyxia: a rare cause of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 515–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Obstetrics, Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Fetal and neonatal neurologic injury. ACOG Technical Bulletin 163. ACOG, Washington, DC, 1992.Google Scholar
Naeye, RL, Peters, EC, Bartholomew, M, et al. Origins of cerebral palsy. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 1154–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Myers, RE, Myers, SE. Use of sedative, analgesic and anesthetic drugs during labor and delivery: bane or boon. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Gallbraith, RS, Muir, DW, et al. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 533–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowes, WA, Gabbe, S, Bowes, C. Fetal heart rate monitoring in premature infants weighing 1500 grams or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 791–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgren, LMR, Malcus, P, Sveningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and longterm outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. The prediction of asphyxia in preterm pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 186: 279–82.Google Scholar
Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. Antepartum fetal asphyxia in the preterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 188: 461–5.Google Scholar
Low, JA. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004; 30: 276–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Boston, RW, Pancham, FR. Fetal asphyxia during the intrapartum period in intrauterine growth retarded infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgran, LMR, Malcus, P, Svenningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and long-term outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google Scholar
Nageotte, MP, Freeman, RK, Garite, TJ, et al. Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 557–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, RL, Huddlestone, JF, Nelson, KG. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH in preterm newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 651–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olshan, AF, Shy, KK, Luthy, DA. Cesarean birth and neonatal mortality in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 267–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Yu, VYH, Bajak, B, Cutting, D, et al. Effect of mode of delivery on outcome of very low birth weight infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kithen, W, Ford, GW, Doyle, LW, et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two year morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 149–57.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Milan, SJ, Livio, S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: CD000078.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, RL, Davis, RO. En caul delivery of the very premature infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 645–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergenhenegouwen, LA, Meertens, LJ, Schaaf, J, et al. Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 172: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richmond, JR, Morin, L, Benjamin, A. Extremely preterm vaginal breech delivery en caul. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 1025–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Tucker Edmonds, B, McKenzie, F, Macheras, M, et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(1): e1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tejani, N, Verma, U, Hameed, C, et al. Method and route of delivery in the low birth weight vertex presentation correlated with early periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 1–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, DB, Miodovnik, MK, Lavin, JP Jr. Neonatal outcome among low birth weight infants delivered spontaneously or by low forceps. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 283–6.Google Scholar
Kriewall, TJ. Structural, mechanical, and material properties of fetal cranial bone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 707–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status. Pediatrics 2007; 1118: e1836–44.Google Scholar
Druzin, ML. Atraumatic delivery in cases of malpresentation of the very low birth weight fetus at cesarean section: the splint technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 941–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barzilay, E, Mazaki-Tovi, S, Amikam, U, et al. Mode of delivery of twin gestation with very low birth weight: is vaginal delivery safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:219.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentilhes, L, Oppenheimer, A, Bouhours, A-C, et al. Neonatal outcome of very preterm twins: policy of planned vaginal or cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(73): e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barret, JFR, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1295–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, H, Diaz-Rossello, JL, Duley, L, Dowswell, T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 8: CD003248.Google Scholar
Rabe, H, Reynolds, G, Diaz-Rossello, J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology 2008; 93(2): 138–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, HC, Costarino, AT, Stayer, SA, et al. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Anag 2015; 120: 1337–51.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System 2015; 64(1): 1–65.Google ScholarPubMed
March of Dimes. Peri Stats, 2008. Available at www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.Google Scholar
Alberman, ED. Cerebral palsy in twins. Guy’s Hosp Rep 1964; 113: 285–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R. Cerebral palsy in twins. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993; 35(4): 370.Google ScholarPubMed
Livinec, F, Ancel, PY, Marret, S, et al. Prenatal risk factors for cerebral palsy in very preterm singletons and twins. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105(6): 1341–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993; 307(6914): 1239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pharoah, PO. Twins and cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr 2001; 90(436): 6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorngren-Jerneck, K, Herbst, A. Perinatal factors associated with cerebral palsy in children born in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108(6): 1499–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG. Williams obstetrics, 24th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2014.Google Scholar
Sadler, TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology, 13th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(5): 1118–32.Google Scholar
Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Sharma, S. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170(3): 824–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scardo, JA, Ellings, JM, Newman, RB. Prospective determination of chorionicity, amnionicity, and zygosity in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173(5): 1376–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenfeld, YJ, Momirova, V, Rouse, DJ, et al. Accuracy of sonographic chorionicity classification in twin gestations. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33(12): 2187–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, MO, Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP, et al. The origin and outcome of preterm twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(4): 553–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, RB, Iams, JD, Das, A, et al. A prospective masked observational study of uterine contraction frequency in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(6): 1564–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113(Suppl. 3): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nassar, AH, Usta, IM, Rechdan, JB, et al. Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(2): 513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Das, A, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: sequential cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182(3): 636–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, CJ, Senyei, AE, Dische, MR, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(10): 669–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, JL, Macara, LM, Owen, P, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observational study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23(6): 561–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Miodovnik, M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175(4 Pt 1): 1047–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, RJ, Fullerton, J, Brown, CE. The utility of fFN for the prediction of preterm birth in twin gestations. JOGNN 2004; 33(4): 446–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, NS, Saltzman, DH, Klauser, CK, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with the use of combined fetal fibronectin and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(3):e313–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Berghella, V, Odibo, AO, To, MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(1): 181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dor, J, Shalev, J, Mashiach, S, et al. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982; 13(1): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Interim report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomized trial of cervical cerclage. BJOG 1988; 95(5): 437–45.Google Scholar
Eskandar, M, Shafiq, H, Almushait, MA, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 99(2): 110–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roman, AS, Rebarber, A, Pereira, L, et al. The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24(6): 763–8; quiz 770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, RB, Krombach, RS, Myers, MC, McGee, DL. Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186(4): 634–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roman, A, Rochelson, B, Fox, NS, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(6): e781–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(24): 2379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Caritis, SN, Peaceman, AM, et al. A trial of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(5): 454–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca, EB, Celik, E, Parra, M, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation second trimester screening G: progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(5): 462–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Vidyadhari, D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(1): 18–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brubaker, SG, Pessel, C, Zork, N, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with twin gestations complicated by short cervix: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2015; 122(5): 712–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goya, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9828): 1800–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, KA, Matthews, JP, Rayburn, WF, Atkinson, BD. Intravenous magnesium sulfate for premature labor: comparison between twin and singleton gestations. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12(1): 7–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Leary, JA. Prophylactic tocolysis of twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154(4): 904–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Lyell, DJ, Pullen, K, Campbell, L, et al. Magnesium sulfate compared with nifedipine for acute tocolysis of preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(1): 61–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Milki, AA, Jun, SH, Hinckley, MD, et al. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(3): 503–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moayeri, SE, Behr, B, Lathi, RB, et al. Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience. Fertil Steril 2007; 87(5): 1028–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adegbite, AL, Castille, S, Ward, S, Bajoria, R. Neuromorbidity in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(1): 156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bejar, R, Vigliocco, G, Gramajo, H, et al. Antenatal origin of neurologic damage in newborn infants. II. Multiple gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162(5): 1230–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahtiyar, MO, Dulay, AT, Weeks, BP, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in monochorionic/diamniotic twin gestations: a systematic literature review. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26(11): 1491–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettit, KE, Merchant, M, Machin, GA, et al. Congenital heart defects in a large, unselected cohort of monochorionic twins. J Perinatol 2013; 33(6): 457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okumura, A, Hayakawa, F, Kato, T, et al. Brain malformation of the surviving twin of intrauterine co-twin demise. J Child Neurol 2007; 22(1): 85–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morokuma, S, Tsukimori, K, Anami, A, et al. Brain injury of the survivor diagnosed at 18 weeks of gestation after intrauterine demise of the co-twin: a case report. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23(2): 146–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Righini, A, Salmona, S, Bianchini, E, et al. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(1): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ezra, Y, Shveiky, D, Ophir, E, et al. Intensive management and early delivery reduce antenatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84(5): 432–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minakami, H, Sato, I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. JAMA 1996; 275(18): 1432–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, B, Lumey, LH, Zybert, PA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(4): 685–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Elias, SG, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008; 115(1): 58–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajoria, R, Wigglesworth, J, Fisk, NM. Angioarchitecture of monochorionic placentas in relation to the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172(3): 856–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutfi, S, Allen, VM, Fahey, J, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(6): 1289–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19(8 Pt 1): 550–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rychik, J, Tian, Z, Bebbington, M, et al. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome: spectrum of cardiovascular abnormality and development of a cardiovascular score to assess severity of disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(4): e391–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chescheir, NC, Seeds, JW. Polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71(6 Pt 1): 882–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Luks, FI, Carr, SR, Plevyak, M, et al. Limited prognostic value of a staging system for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19(3): 301–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mari, G, Roberts, A, Detti, L, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome: results of the International Amnioreduction Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(3): 708–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(2): 136–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombleholme, TM, Shera, D, Lee, H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(4): e391–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruano, R, Rodo, C, Peiro, JL, et al. Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome using ‘Solomon technique’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(4): 434–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papanna, R, Block-Abraham, D, Mann, LK, et al. Risk factors associated with preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43(1): 48–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degani, S, Leibovitz, Z, Shapiro, I, et al. Instability of Doppler cerebral blood flow in monochorionic twins. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25(4): 449–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopriore, E, Nagel, HT, Vandenbussche, FP, Walther, FJ. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(5): 1314–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graef, C, Ellenrieder, B, Hecher, K, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of 167 children after intrauterine laser treatment for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194(2): 303–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Sueters, M, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196(3): e231–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopriore, E, Ortibus, E, Acosta-Rojas, R, et al. Risk factors for neurodevelopment impairment in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113(2 Pt 1): 361–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masheer, S, Maheen, H, Munim, S. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28(1): 23–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaru, RC, Bush, MC, Berkowitz, RL, et al. Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome? Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(1): 71–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branum, AM, Schoendorf, KC. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101(3): 570–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Demissie, K, Ananth, CV, Martin, J, et al. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(3): 474–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Gratacos, E, Carreras, E, Becker, J, et al. Prevalence of neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24(2): 159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000(2): CD000034.Google ScholarPubMed
Chasen, ST, Spiro, SJ, Kalish, RB, Chervenak, FA. Changes in fetal presentation in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17(1): 45–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192(3): 840–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(14): 1295–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, NS, Silverstein, M, Bender, S, et al. Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a U.S. population. Obstet gynecol. 2010; 115(2 Pt 1): 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, L, Easterling, TR, Jackson, JC, Benedetti, TJ. Breech extraction of low-birth-weight second twins: can cesarean section be justified? Am j obstet gynecol 1992; 166(2): 497–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, WJ, O’Brien, WF, Knuppel, RA, Gaylord, S, Hayes, P. The effect of mode of delivery on the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in nondiscordant twin gestations under 1500 g. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73(1): 107–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Ford, AA, Bateman, BT, Simpson, LL. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(4): 1138–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, DA, Mullin, P, Hou, D, Paul, RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175(1): 194–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansregret, A, Bujold, E, Gauthier, RJ. Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2003; 25(4): 294–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Rozance, PJ, Brown, LD, Thorn, SR, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and the small-for-gestational-age infant. In MacDonald, MG, Seshia, MMK, eds., Avery’s Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015.Google Scholar
Smart, J. Undernutrition, learning and memory: review of experimental studies. In Taylor, TG, Jenkins, NK, eds. Proceedings of XII International Congress of Nutrition. London: John Libbey, 1986: 74.Google Scholar
Cruz-Martínez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 618–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, RA, Gounis, AS, Bangalore, SA, Ogata, ES. Intrauterine growth retardation: fetal glucose transport is diminished in lung but spared in brain. Pediatr Res 1992; 32: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poudel, R, McMillen, IC, Dunn, SL, et al. Impact of chronic hypoxemia on blood flow to the brain, heart, and adrenal gland in the late-gestation IUGR sheep fetus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2015; 308: R151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo-Melendez, M, Yawno, T, Allison, BJ, et al. Cerebrovascular adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the growth restricted lamb. Int J Dev Neurosci 2015; 29:ii.Google Scholar
Toft, PB, Leth, H, Ring, PB, et al. Volumetric analysis of the normal infant brain and in intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1995; 43: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Østgård, HF, Løhaugen, GC, Bjuland, KJ, et al. Brain morphometry and cognition in young adults born small for gestational age at term. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 921–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lager, S, Powell, TL. Regulation of nutrient transport across the placenta. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 179827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaccioli, F, Aye, IL, Roos, S, et al. Expression and functional characterisation of system L amino acid transporters in the human term placenta. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 9(13):57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepercq, J, Hauguel De Mouzo, SJ. Leptin during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2002; 31: 167–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Symonds, ME, Pope, M, Sharkey, D, Budge, H. Adipose tissue and fetal programming. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 1597–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosario, FJ, Schumacher, MA, Jiang, J, et al. Chronic maternal infusion of full-length adiponectin in pregnant mice down-regulates placental amino acid transporter activity and expression and decreases fetal growth. J Physiol 2012; 15(590): 1495–509.Google Scholar
Limesand, SW, Jensen, J, Hutton, JC, Hay, WW Jr. Diminished beta-cell replication contributes to reduced beta-cell mass in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005; 288: R1297–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozance, PJ, Anderson, M, Martinez, M, et al. Placental insufficiency decreases pancreatic vascularity and disrupts hepatocyte growth factor signaling in the pancreatic islet endothelial cell in fetal sheep. Diabetes 2015; 64: 555–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, SE, Brown, LD, Thorn, SR, et al. Increased adrenergic signaling is responsible for decreased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the chronically hyperinsulinemic ovine fetus. Endocrinology 2015; 156: 367–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowden, Al. The insulin-like growth factors and feto-placental growth. Placenta 2003; 24(8–9): 803–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, P, Carson, J, D’Ercole, AJ. In vivo actions of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on brain myelination: studies of IGF-I and IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) transgenic mice. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 7344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abuzzahab, MJ, Schneider, A, Goddard, A, et al. Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) Study Group. IFG-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(23): 2211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, MU, Schneider, H, Malek, A, et al. Regulation of human trophoblast GLUT1 glucose transporter by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). PLoS One 2014; 9(8):e106037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sferruzzi-Perri, AN, Vaughan, OR, Forhead, AJ, Fowden, AL. Hormonal and nutritional drivers of intrauterine growth. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013; 16: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gressens, P, Hill, JM, Paindaveine, B, et al. Severe microcephaly induced by blockade of vasoactive intestinal peptide function in the primitive neuroepithelium of the mouse. J Clin Invest 1994; 94: 2020–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, KH, Economides, DL, Soothill, PW. Blood gases, pH, and lactate in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 996–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholl, TO, Hediger, ML, Schall, JI, et al. Maternal growth during pregnancy and the competition for nutrients. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 183–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, JO, Baker, CJ, Remington, JS, et al. Current concepts of infection of the fetus and newborn infants. In Remington, JS, Klein, JO, Wilson, CB, Baker, CJ, eds., Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2006: 1–25.Google Scholar
Kleigman, RM. Intrauterine growth restriction. In Fanaroff, AA, Martin, RJ, Walsh, MC, eds., Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of the Fetus and Infant, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2006: 221–306.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Friedman, AM. Ischemic placental disease and risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38: 151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roos, S, Powell, TL, Jansson, T. Placental mTOR links maternal nutrient availability to fetal growth. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37: 295–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumey, LH. Decreased birth weights in infants after maternal in utero exposure to the Dutch famine of 1944–1945. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1992; 6: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, PM, McIntyre, HD, Cruickshank, JK, et al. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 780–6.Google Scholar
Hernandez, TL, Van Pelt, RE, Anderson, MA, et al. A higher-complex carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes mellitus achieves glucose targets and lowers postprandial lipids: a randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1254–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crume, TL, Shapiro, AL, Brinton, JT, et al. Maternal fuels and metabolic measures during pregnancy and neonatal body composition: the healthy start study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 1672–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ota, E, Mori, R, Middleton, P, et al. Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2(2):CD000230.Google Scholar
Butterworth, RF. Maternal thiamine deficiency: still a problem in some world communities. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74: 712–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, J, Abraham, S, Taylor, A. Eating behavior and pregnancy outcome. J Psychosom Res 1998; 44: 465–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Many, A, Fattal, A, Leitner, Y, et al. Neurodevelopmental and cognitive assessment of children born growth restricted to mothers with and without preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2003; 22: 25–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manuck, T, Branch, DW, Lai, Y, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy outcomes in women heterozygous for factor V Leiden. J Reprod Immunol 2010; 85: 180–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triche, EW, Hossain, N. Environmental factors implicated in the causation of diverse pregnancy outcome. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 240–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatt, K, Moore, E, Chen, A, et al. Association of reported trimester-specific smoking cessation with fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1452–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, K. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and infant head circumference at birth. Early Hum Dev 2000; 58: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, RC, Jacobson, JL, Sokol, RJ, et al. Fetal alcohol-related growth restriction from birth through young adulthood and moderating effects of maternal prepregnancy weight. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 452–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, BB, Snell, LM. Brain growth among fetuses exposed to cocaine in utero: asymmetrical growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 361–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Frank, DA, Bauchner, H, Parker, S, et al. Neonatal body proportionality and body composition after in utero exposure to cocaine and marijuana. J Pediatr 1990; 117: 622–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, MS, Brent, RL. Teratogen update: evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. Teratology 2001; 64: 51–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, Salinas, CE, Villena, M. The role of oxygen in prenatal growth: studies in the chick embryo. J Physiol 2007; 585: 911–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milley, JR. Ovine fetal leucine kinetics and protein metabolism during decreased oxygen availability. Am J Physiol 1998; 274:e618–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Illsley, NP, Caniggia, I, Zamudio, S. Placental metabolic reprogramming: do changes in the mix of energy-generating substrates modulate fetal growth? Int J Dev Biol 2010; 54: 409–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soria, R, Julian, CG, Vargas, E, et al. Graduated effects of high-altitude hypoxia and highland ancestry on birth size. Pediatr Res 2013; 74: 633–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, MJ, Lopez, M, Vargas, M, et al. Greater uterine artery blood flow during pregnancy in multigenerational (Andean) than shorter-term (European) high-altitude residents. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R1313–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, A, Sain, SR, Vargas, E, Moore, LG. The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery: a study among southern Thai women. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 1013–21.Google Scholar
Tuntiseranee, P, Geater, A, Chongsuvivatwong, V, Kor-anantakul, O. The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery: a study among southern Thai women. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 1013–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koos, BJ, Longo, LD. Mercury toxicity in the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 390–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albu, AR, Horhoianu, IA, Dumitrascu, MC, Horhoianu, V. Growth assessment in diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. J Med Life 2014; 5(7): 150–4.Google Scholar
Grivell, RM, Wong, L, Bhatia, V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6:CD007113.Google Scholar
Businelli, C, de Wit, C, Visser, GH, Pistorius, LR. Ultrasound evaluation of cortical brain development in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 10: 1–6.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, R, Kingdom, JC, Geary, M, Rodeck, CH. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 209–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(288):e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Martinez, R, Tenorio, V, Padilla, N, et al. Risk of neonatal brain ultrasound abnormalities in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:389–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girardi, G. MRI-based methods to detect placental and fetal brain abnormalities in utero. J Reprod Immunol 2015; 2:pii: S0165–0378(15)00094–7.Google Scholar
Marconi, AM, Ronzoni, S, Vailati, S, et al. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies is predicated upon prenatal diagnosis of clinical severity. Reprod Sci 2009; 16: 373–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marconi, AM, Paolini, CL, Zerbe, G, Battaglia, FC. Lactacidemia in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies: relationship to clinical severity, oxygenation and placental weight. Pediatr Res 2006; 59: 570–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regnault, TR, de Vrijer, B, Galan, HL, et al. Development and mechanisms of fetal hypoxia in severe fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2007; 28: 714–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salihagić-Kadić, A, Medić, M, Jugović, D, et al. Fetal cerebrovascular response to chronic hypoxia: implications for the prevention of brain damage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 387–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueras, F, Eixarch, E, Meler, E, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 34–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendapudi, P, Rao, GG, Greenough, A. Diagnosis and management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015; 16: 157–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, DL, Weston, PJ, Harding, JE. Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 787–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawdon, JM, Aynsley-Green, A, Ward Platt, MP. Neonatal blood glucose concentrations: metabolic effects of intravenous glucagon and intragastric medium chain triglyceride. Arch Dis Child 1993; 68: 255–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limesand, SW, Rozance, PJ, Smith, D, Hay, WW Jr. Increased insulin sensitivity and maintenance of glucose utilization rates in fetal sheep with placental insufficiency and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293: E1716–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kempen, AA, Ackermans, MT, Endert, E, et al. Glucose production in response to glucagon is comparable in preterm AGA and SGA infants. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 727–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arya, VB, Flanagan, SE, Kumaran, A, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in infants born small-for-gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98: F356–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macko, AR, Yates, DT, Chen, X, et al. Elevated plasma norepinephrine inhibits insulin secretion, but adrenergic blockade reveals enhanced β-cell responsiveness in an ovine model of placental insufficiency at 0.7 of gestation. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2013; 4: 402–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatford, KL, Simmons, RA. Prenatal programming of insulin secretion in intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 520–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, TL, Korte, JE, Katikaneni, LD, et al. Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(255):e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorn, SR, Regnault, TRH, Brown, LD, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction increases fetal hepatic gluconeogenic capacity and reduces hepatic and skeletal muscle mRNA translation initiation and nutrient sensing. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3021–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorn, SR, Brown, LD, Rozance, PJ, et al. Increased hepatic glucose production in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction is not suppressed by insulin. Diabetes 2013; 62: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A, Agarwal, R, Sankar, MJ, et al. Hypocalcemia in the newborn. Ind J Pediatr 2010; 77: 1123–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bauer, J, Masin, M, Brodner, K. Resting energy expenditure and metabolic parameters in small for gestational age moderately preterm infants. Horm Res Paediatr 2011; 76: 202–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasser, I, Sutten, N, Schmeling, M, Machan, JT. A comprehensive study of umbilical cord blood cell developmental changes and reference ranges by gestation, gender and mode of delivery. J Perinatol 2015; 35: 469–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basha, S, Surendran, N, Pichichero, M. Immune responses in neonates. Exp Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10: 1171–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempley, S, Gupta, N, Linsell, L, et al. Feeding infants below 29 weeks’ gestation with abnormal antenatal Doppler: analysis from a randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014; 99: F6–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdelmaaboud, M, Mohammed, A. Early versus late minimal enteral feeding in weeks preterm growth-restricted neonates with abnormal antenatal Doppler studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012 (epub ahead of print).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaf, A, Dorling, J, Kempley, S, et al. Abnormal Doppler Enteral Prescription Trial Collaborative Group. Early or delayed enteral feeding for preterm growth-restricted infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2012; 129: e1260–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, AG, Edwards, DA, Henderson-Smart, DJ. The influence of intra-uterine growth retardation on brainstem development of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, OH, Fleming, PJ, Morgan, MH. Development of visual evoked potentials following intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1991; 27: 79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherjon, S, Briët, J, Oosting, H, Kok, J. The discrepancy between maturation of visual-evoked potentials and cognitive outcome at five years in very preterm infants with and without hemodynamic signs of fetal brain-sparing. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 385–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijhuis, IJ, ten Hof, J, Nijhuis, JG, et al. Temporal organization of fetal behavior from 24-weeks gestation onwards in normal and complicated pregnancies. Dev Psychobiol 1999; 34: 257–68.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, JM, Berg, A, Egerter, SA. Is intrauterine growth retardation a risk factor for child abuse? Pediatrics 1987; 79: 515–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, J. Interaction and development in the first year. II. The effects of intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1986; 13: 211–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Pallotto, EK, Killbride, HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 257–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortibus, E, Lopriore, E, Deprest, J, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: a multicenter prospective cohort study from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(494):e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Beckerath, AK, Kollmann, M, Rotky-Fast, C, et al. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(130):e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, TA, Grunau, RE, McAuliffe, FM, et al. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 135: 126–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Fu, W, Liu, J. Neurodevelopment in children with intrauterine growth restriction: adverse effects and interventions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 23: 1–9.Google Scholar
Murray, E, Fernandes, M, Fazel, M, et al. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG 2015; 122: 1062–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, PH. Growth of low birth weight preterm children. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 20–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogne, T, Engstrøm, AA, Jacobsen, GW, et al. Fetal growth, cognitive function, and brain volumes in childhood and adolescence. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 673–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, S, Blair, E, Badawi, N, et al. Antecedents of cerebral palsy and perinatal death in term and late preterm singletons. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 869–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, M. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on mental performance and behavior outcomes during adolescence and adulthood. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: S65–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Yerushalmy-Feler, A, Marom, R, Peylan, T, et al. Electroencephalographic characteristics in preterm infants born with intrauterine growth restriction. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 756–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simić Klarić, A, Kolundžić, Z, Galić, S. Language development inpreschool children born after asymmetrical intrautering growth retardation. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16: 132–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortigosa Rocha, C, Bittar, RE, Zugaib, M. Neonatal outcomes of late-preterm birth associated or not with intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010; 2010: 231842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fattal-Valevski, A, Leitner, Y, Kutai, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: a 3-year follow-up. J Child Neurol 1999; 14: 724–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jesus, LC, Pappas, A, Shankaran, S, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at <27 weeks’ gestation. J Pediatr 2013; 163(55–60):e1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guellec, I, Lapillonne, A, Renolleau, S, et al. Neurologic outcomes at school age in very preterm infants born with severe or mild growth restriction. Pediatrics 2011; 127: e883–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aucott, SW, Donohue, PK, Northington, FJ. Increased morbidity in severe early intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 435–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, P. Fetal growth restriction and preterm as determinants of child growth in the first two years and potential interventions. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2014; 78: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J, Workman, M, Bedrick, E, et al. Brains versus brawn: an empirical test of Barker’s brain sparing model. Am J Hum Biol 2010; 22: 206–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basilious, A, Yager, J, Fehlings, MG. Neurological outcomes of animal models of uterine artery ligation and relevance to human intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015; 57: 420–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piorkowska, K, Thompson, J, Nygard, K, et al. Synaptic development and neuronal myelination are altered with growth restriction in fetal guinea pigs. Dev Neurosci 2014; 36: 465–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, M, Breslau, N, Weissman, B, et al. Effect of very low birth weight and subnormal head size on cognitive abilities at school age. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 231–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundgren, EM, Tuvemo, T. Effects of being born small for gestational age on long-term intellectual performance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 22: 477–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paz, I, Seidman, DS, Danon, YL, et al. Are children born small for gestational age at increased risk of short stature? Am J Dis Child 1993; 147: 337–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Bergvall, N, Iliadou, A, Johansson, S, et al. Risks for low intellectual performance related to being born small for gestational age are modified by gestational age. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e460–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monset-Couchard, M, de Bethmann, O. Catch-up growth in 166 small-forgestational age premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth. Biol Neonate 2000; 78: 161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bie, HM, de Ruiter, MB, Ouwendijk, M, et al. Using fMRI to investigate memory in young children born small for gestational age. PLoS One 2015; 1(10):e0129721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinillo, A, Gardella, B, Preti, E, et al. Rates of neonatal death and cerebral palsy associated with fetal growth restriction among very low birth weight infants: a temporal analysis. BJOG 2006; 113: 775–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, AH, Thompson, SC, Gecz, J. Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 779–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, EM, Nelson, KB. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(520):e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Callaghan, ME, MacLennan, AH, Gibson, CS, et al. Epidemiologic associations with cerebral palsy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 576–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Spence, D, Alderdice, FA, Stewart, MC, et al. Does intrauterine growth restriction affect quality of life in adulthood? Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 700–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geva, R, Eshel, R, Leitner, Y, et al. Neuropsychological outcome of children with intrauterine growth restriction: a 9-year prospective study. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergvall, N, Iliadou, A, Tuvemo, T, Cnattingius, S. Birth characteristics and risk of low intellectual performance in early adulthood: are the associations confounded by socioeconomic factors in adolescence or familial effects? Pediatrics 2006; 117: 714–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, H, Nassar, N, Bourke, J, et al. Relation between intrauterine growth and subsequent intellectual disability in a ten-year population cohort of children in Western Australia. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167: 103–11.Google Scholar
Leitner, Y, Fattal-Valevski, A, Geva, R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with intrauterine growth retardation: a longitudinal, 10-year prospective study. J Child Neurol 2007; 22: 580–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ, Gluckman, PD, Godfrey, KM, et al. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993; 341: 938–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gortner, L. Intrauterine growth restriction and risk for arterial hypertension: a causal relationship? J Perinat Med 2007; 35: 361–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, TP, Ozanne, SE. Developmental programming of type 2 diabetes: early nutrition and epigenetic mechanisms. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2015; 18: 354–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duque-Guimarães, DE, Ozanne, SE. Nutritional programming of insulin resistance: causes and consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2013; 245: 525–35.Google Scholar
Forsén, T, Eriksson, J, Tuomilehto, J, et al. The fetal and childhood growth of persons who develop type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 176–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, Thornburg, KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 61–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayer, AA, Syddall, H, Martin, H, et al. The developmental origins of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging 2008; 12: 427–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koklu, E, Ozturk, MA, Kurtoglu, S, et al. Aortic intima-media thickness, serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and leptin levels in intrauterine growth-restricted newborns of healthy mothers. Pediatr Res 2007; 62: 704–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skilton, MR, Evans, N, Griffiths, KA, et al. Aortic wall thickness in newborns with intrauterine growth restriction. Lancet 2005; 365: 1484–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Harding, JE. The late effects of fetal growth patterns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F299–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ, Eriksson, JG, Forsen, T, Osmond, C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 1235–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Lacasse, Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 402–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satterfield, MC, Bazer, FW, Spencer, TE, Wu, G. Sildenafil citrate treatment enhances amino acid availability in the conceptus and fetal growth in an ovine model of intrauterine growth restriction. J Nutr 2010; 140: 251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boo, HA, Eremia, SC, Bloomfield, FH, et al. Treatment of intrautere growth restriction with maternal growth hormone supplementation in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(599):e1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozance, PJ, Limesand, SW, Barry, JS, et al. Glucose replacement to euglycemia causes hypoxia, acidosis, and decreased insulin secretion in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr Res 2009; 65: 72–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, D, Stein, Z, Susser, M. A randomized controlled trial of prenatal nutritional supplementation in New York City. Pediatrics 1980; 65: 683–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceesay, SM, Prentice, AM, Cole, TJ, et al. Effects on birth weight and perinatal mortality of maternal dietary supplements in rural Gambia: 5 year randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997; 315: 786–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Maternal nutrient supplementation for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000148.Google Scholar
Catalano, PM, Thomas, AJ, Huston, LP, Fung, CM. Effect of maternal metabolism on fetal growth and body composition. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(Suppl. 2):B85–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Fernandez-Twinn, DS, Ozanne, SE. Mechanisms by which poor early growth programs type-2 diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Physiol Behav 2006; 88: 234–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Plasma volume expansion for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000167.Google Scholar
Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000034.Google Scholar
Kinzler, WL, Kaminsky, L. Fetal growth restriction and subsequent pregnancy risks. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 126–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, B, Aharon, A. Thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 527–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, LD, Green, AS, Limesand, SW, Rozance, PJ. Maternal amino acid supplementation for intrauterine growth restriction. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2011; 3: 428–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Dusick, AM, Poindexter, BB, Ehrenkranz, RA, Lemons, JA. Growth failure in the preterm infant: can we catch up? Semin Perinatol 2003; 27: 302–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Sanz-Cortes, M, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 288–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, TA, Grunau, RE, McAuliffe, FM, et al. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 135: 126–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, E, Fernandes, M, Fazel, M, et al. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG 2015; 122: 1062–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S, Evans, TA, Draper, ES, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: F301–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serenius, F, Kallen, K, Blennow, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2013; 309: 1810–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, YW, Colford, JM Jr. Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2000; 284: 1417–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banach, R, Boskovic, R, Einarson, T, Koren, G. Long-term developmental outcome of children of women with epilepsy, unexposed or exposed prenatally to antiepileptic drugs: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Drug Safety 2010; 33: 73–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vajda, FJ, Hitchcock, AA, Graham, J, et al. The teratogenic risk of antiepileptic drug polytherapy. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 805–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromley, R, Weston, J, Adab, N, et al. Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 10: CD010236.Google Scholar
Meador, KJ, Baker, GA, Browning, N, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 244–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, MJ, Meador, KJ, Browning, N, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure: adaptive and emotional/behavioral functioning at age 6 years. Epilepsy Behav 2013; 29: 308–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchenko, A, Etwel, F, Olutunfese, O, et al. Pregnancy outcome following prenatal exposure to triptan medications: a meta-analysis. Headache 2015; 55:490–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, DE. Clinical practice: depression during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1605–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mei-Dan, E, Ray, JG, Vigod, SN. Perinatal outcomes among women with bipolar disorder: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(367): e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksen, HL, Kesmodel, US, Pedersen, LH, Mortensen, EL. No association between prenatal exposure to psychotropics and intelligence at age five. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2015; 94: 501–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streissguth, AP, Aase, JM, Clarren, SK, et al. Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. JAMA 1991; 265: 1961–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patra, J, Bakker, R, Irving, H, et al. Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA): a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG 2011; 118: 1411–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falgreen Eriksen, HL, Kesmodel, US, et al. Effects of tobacco smoking in pregnancy on offspring intelligence at the age of 5. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012:945196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilman, SE, Gardener, H, Buka, SL. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and children’s cognitive and physical development: a causal risk factor? Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168: 522–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, M, Smith, VC, Committee on Substance A, Committee on F, Newborn. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics 2013; 131:e1009–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creasy, R, Resnik, R, Iams, J, et al. Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. New York: Elsevier Saunders, 2014.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, ME, Raz, S, Sander, CJ. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children born to mothers with hypertension in pregnancy: the significance of suboptimal intrauterine growth. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 200–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenstein, V, Rothman, KJ, Pedersen, L, et al. Pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders and adult cognitive function among Danish conscripts. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170: 1025–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, CK, Krakowiak, P, Baker, A, et al. Preeclampsia, placental insufficiency, and autism spectrum disorder or developmental delay. JAMA Pediatrics 2015; 169: 154–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortolus, R, Ricci, E, Chatenoud, L, Parazzini, F. Nifedipine administered in pregnancy: effect on the development of children at 18 months. BJOG 2000; 107: 792–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, WS, Koren, G, Barrera, M, et al. Neurocognitive development of children following in-utero exposure to labetalol for maternal hypertension: a cohort study using a prospectively collected database. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2010; 29: 271–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawhney, H, Suri, V, Vasishta, K, et al. Pregnancy and congenital heart disease: maternal and fetal outcome. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38: 266–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, B, Rydhstroem, H, Aberg, A. Asthma during pregnancy: a population based study. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 167–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyall, K, Ashwood, P, Van de Water, J, Hertz-Picciotto, I. Maternal immune-mediated conditions, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay. J Autism Dev Disord 2014; 44: 1546–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, EM, Swamy, GK, Heine, RP, et al. Medical and obstetric complications among pregnant women with cystic fibrosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(98):e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morreale de Escobar, G, Obregon, MJ, Escobar del Rey, F. Role of thyroid hormone during early brain development. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 151(Suppl. 3):U25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavado-Autric, R, Auso, E, Garcia-Velasco, JV, et al. Early maternal hypothyroxinemia alters histogenesis and cerebral cortex cytoarchitecture of the progeny. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 1073–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyamfi, C, Wapner, RJ, D’Alton, ME. Thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy: the basic science and clinical evidence surrounding the controversy in management. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 702–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Pharoah, PO, Buttfield, IH, Hetzel, BS. Neurological damage to the fetus resulting from severe iodine deficiency during pregnancy. Lancet 1971; 1: 308–10.Google Scholar
Haddow, JE, Palomaki, GE, Allan, WC, et al. Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 549–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer-Graf, UM, Buchanan, TA, Xiang, A, et al. Patterns of congenital anomalies and relationship to initial maternal fasting glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by type 2 and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, TD, Mortensen, EL, Schmidt, L, et al. Cognitive function in adult offspring of women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Med 2011; 28: 838–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, A, Almqvist, C, Larsson, H, et al. Maternal diabetes in pregnancy and offspring cognitive ability: sibling study with 723,775 men from 579,857 families. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 102–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, TD, Mortensen, EL, Schmidt, L, et al. Cognitive function in adult offspring of women with gestational diabetes–the role of glucose and other factors. PloS One 2013; 8: e67107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, EW, Haeusslein, LA, Bonifacio, SL, et al. Hypoglycemia is associated with increased risk for brain injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates at risk for encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 88–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics CoG. Maternal phenylketonuria. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 445–9.Google Scholar
Cetin, I, Corbetta, C, Sereni, LP, et al. Umbilical amino acid concentrations in normal and growth-retarded fetuses sampled in utero by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenke, RR, Levy, HL. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia: an international survey of the outcome of untreated and treated pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 1202–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouse, B, Azen, C, Koch, R, et al. Maternal Phenylketonuria Collaborative Study (MPKUCS) offspring: facial anomalies, malformations, and early neurological sequelae. Am J Med Genet 1997; 69:89–95.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, LD, Berkowitz, RL, Moise, KJ Jr, et al. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a management algorithm based on risk stratification. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1157–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, HA, Shulman, NR, Marder, VJ, Cone, TE Jr. Isoimmune neonatal thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Blood 1964; 23: 154–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiller, H, Kamphuis, MM, Flodmark, O, et al. Fetal intracranial haemorrhages caused by fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an observational cohort study of 43 cases from an international multicentre registry. BMJ Open 2013; 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisz, B, Rosenbaum, O, Chayen, B, et al. Outcome of severely anaemic fetuses treated by intrauterine transfusions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94: F201–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Copel, JA, Bahtiyar, MO. A practical approach to fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1057–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, M, Viall, CA, Chamley, LW. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the placenta: a systematic review of their in vitro effects and modulation by treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, A, Oliveira, GH, Lahr, BD, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2060–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostensen, M, Clowse, M. Pathogenesis of pregnancy complications in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013; 25: 591–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, DM, Kim, MY, Copel, JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of fetuses with autoimmune-associated congenital heart block followed in the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1102–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirvikoski, T, Nordenstrom, A, Lindholm, T, et al. Cognitive functions in children at risk for congenital adrenal hyperplasia treated prenatally with dexamethasone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 542–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khandaker, GM, Zimbron, J, Lewis, G, Jones, PB. Prenatal maternal infection, neurodevelopment and adult schizophrenia: a systematic review of population-based studies. Psychol Med 2013; 43: 239–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atladottir, HO, Henriksen, TB, Schendel, DE, Parner, ET. Autism after infection, febrile episodes, and antibiotic use during pregnancy: an exploratory study. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1447–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zerbo, O, Iosif, AM, Walker, C, et al. Is maternal influenza or fever during pregnancy associated with autism or developmental delays? Results from the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) study. J Autism Dev Disord 2013; 43:25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roizen, N, Swisher, CN, Stein, MA, et al. Neurologic and developmental outcome in treated congenital toxoplasmosis. Pediatrics 1995; 95:11–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Demmler, GJ, Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control. Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13: 315–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulon, I, Naessens, A, Foulon, W, et al. A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 84–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanari, M, Lazzarotto, T, Venturi, V, et al. Neonatal cytomegalovirus blood load and risk of sequelae in symptomatic and asymptomatic congenitally infected newborns. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, KB, Stagno, S, Pass, RF, et al. The outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to maternal antibody status. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 663–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauerbrei, A, Wutzler, P. The congenital varicella syndrome. J Perinatol 2000; 20: 548–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chau, V, McFadden, DE, Poskitt, KJ, Miller, SP. Chorioamnionitis in the pathogenesis of brain injury in preterm infants. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeraus, WH, Petersen, I, Gilbert, R. Association between antibiotic prescribing in pregnancy and cerebral palsy or epilepsy in children born at term: a cohort study using the health improvement network. PloS One 2015; 10: e0122034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manuck, TA, Varner, MW. Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following early vs later preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(308): e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, Saade, GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for MaternalFetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 745–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyasu, S, Saftlas, AK, Rowley, DL, et al. The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1424–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cresswell, JA, Ronsmans, C, Calvert, C, Filippi, V. Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health 2013; 18: 712–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:89–92.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanlysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, MA, Mittendorf, R, Lieberman, E, et al. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy in relation to placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handler, AS, Mason, ED, Rosenberg, DL, et al. The relationship between exposure during pregnancy to cigarette smoking and cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 884–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, M, Torbin, Y, Arieli, S, et al. In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 642–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, CD, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farine, D, Fox, HE, Jakobson, S, et al. Is it really a placenta previa? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 31: 103–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, RS, Lauria, MR, Comstock, CH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low lying or over the internal cervical os. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 22–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzberg, BS, Bowie, JD, Carroll, BA, et al. Diagnosis of placenta previa during the third trimester: role of transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roetgenol 1992; 159: 83–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, WB, Dumas, MD, Romano, WM, et al. Translabial ultrasonography and placenta previa: does measurement of the os-placenta distance predict outcome? Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 441–6.Google ScholarPubMed
McShane, PM, Heyl, PS, Epstein, MF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, et al. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiweicz, LS, et al. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, G, Steer, P. ABC of labour care: obstetric emergencies. BMJ 1999; 318: 1342–5.Google ScholarPubMed
D’Angelo, LJ, Irwin, LF. Conservation management of placenta previa: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 320–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Wing, DA, Paul, RH, Millar, LK. Management of the symptomatic placenta previa: a randomized, controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 806–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brar, HS, Platt, LD, De Vore, GR, et al. Fetal umbilical velocimetry for the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by placenta previa. Reprod Med 1988; 33: 741–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolf, EJ, Mallozi, A, Rodis, JF, et al. Placenta previa is not an independent risk factor for a small for gestational age infant. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 707–9.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Demisse, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crane, JM, van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, et al. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 541–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Kåregård, M, Gennser, G. Incidence and recurrence rate of abruptio placentae in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 523–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, et al. Perinatal outcome in abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JA, Cunningham, FG, Pritchard, SA, et al. On reducing the frequency of severe abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krohn, M, Voig, L, McKnight, B, et al. Correlates of placental abruption. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toohey, JS, Keegan, KA, Morgan, MA, et al. The “dangerous multipara”: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 683–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Bowes, WA, et al. Influence of hypertensive disorders and cigarette smoking on placental abruption and uterine bleeding during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 572–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM, Lindheimer, M, Hauth, J, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development network of maternal–fetal medicine units. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 667–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, et al. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, DP, Ananth, CV. Risk factor profiles of placental abruption in first and second pregnancies: heterogeneous etiologies. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonen, R, Hannah, ME, Milligan, JE. Does prolonged premature rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 347–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Major, CA, de Veciana, M, Lewis, DF, et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: is there an association between these pregnancy complications? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 672–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bingol, N, Fuchs, M, Diaz, V, et al. Teratogenicity of cocaine in humans. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 93–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoskins, IA, Friedman, DM, Frieden, FJ, et al. Relationship between antepartum cocaine abuse, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 279–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Slutsker, L. Risks associated with cocaine use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 778–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 50–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gherman, RB, Goodwin, TM. Obstetric implications of activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden mutation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55: 117–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettel, LM, Branch, DW, Scott, JR. Occult placental abruption after maternal trauma. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 449–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Stafford, PA, Biddinger, PW, Zumwalt, RE. Lethal intrauterine fetal trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 485–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nimrod, CA, Oppenheimer, LW. Medicine of the Fetus and Mother, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999: 1498–501.Google Scholar
Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Hertzberg, V, et al. Selective management of abruptio placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Combs, CA, Nyberg, DA, Mack, LA, et al. Expectant management after sonographic diagnosis of placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9: 170–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunfeld, JP, Pertuiset, N. Acute renal failure in pregnancy: 1987. Am J Kidney Dis 1987; 9: 359–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, KJ. Abruptio placentae. In Mishell, DR, Brenner, DR, eds., Management of Common Problems in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd edn. Boston: Blackwell, 1994: 211–15.Google Scholar
Spinillo, A, Fazzi, E, Stronati, I, et al. Early morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcome in low birth weight infants born after third trimester bleeding. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11:85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, G, Saunders, DM. Vasa praevia: another cause of concern in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28: 180–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyelese, KO, Schwarzler, P, Coates, S, et al. A strategy for reducing the mortality rate from vasa previa using transvaginal sonography with color Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 377–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carp, HJ, Mashiach, S, Serr, DM. Vasa previa: a major complication and its management. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 273–5.Google Scholar
Cordero, DR, Helfgoftt, AW, Landy, HJ, et al. A non-hemorrhagic manifestation of vasa previa: a clinico-pathologic case report. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:698–700.Google Scholar
Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverma, F, et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295–300.Google ScholarPubMed
Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, et al. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999; 54: 138–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, JA, Lewis, DF, Major, CA, et al. Color flow Doppler: a useful instrument in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1566–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, WJ, Blumenthal, L, Cadkin, A, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis with transvaginal color Doppler flow imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1627–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hata, K, Hata, T, Fujiwaki, R, et al. An accurate antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 265–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clerici, G, Burnelli, L, Lauro, V, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa presenting as amniotic band: “a not so innocent amniotic band.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 61–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W, Kirk, JS, Comstock, CH, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 384–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Oyelese, Y, Chavez, MR, Yeo, I, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 211–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 542–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellpfeffer, MA. Improved neonatal outcome of vasa previa with aggressive intrapartum management: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 327–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430–9.Google Scholar
Gyamfi-Bannerman, C, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1332–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwitz, ER, Stern, HM, Grier, H, Lee-Parritz, A. Placenta percreta and uterine rupture associated with prior whole body radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 929–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Hare, AA, Olah, KS. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: a review article. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1458–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wax, JR, Seiler, A, Horowitz, S, Ingardia, CJ. Interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for placenta accreta. Conn Med 2000; 64: 659–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Esh-Broder, E, Ariel, I, Abas-Bashir, N, et al. Placenta accreta is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. BJOG 2011; 118: 1084–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkley, EM, Abuhamad, AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete: is sonography all we need? J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, CH, Bronsteen, RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014; 121: 171–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Antonio, F, Iacovella, C, Palacios-Jarquemada, J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, RM, Fox, KA, Barton, JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 561–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with placenta previa and accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 835–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentilhes, L, Ambroselli, C, Kayem, G, et al. Maternal outcome after conservative management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 526–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggs, JC, Jahshan, A, Schiavello, HJ. Alternative conservative management of placenta accreta: a case report. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 595–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Grobman, WA, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeye, RL. Umbilical cord length: clinical significance. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 278–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krakowiak, P, Smith, EN, de Bruyn, G, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with a short umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolschau, J. The relationship between some disorders of the umbilical cord and intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand Suppl 1978; 72:15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, CC, Pretorious, DH, Scioscia, AL, et al. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of marginal placental cord insertion: clinical importance. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 627–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, S, Ryynaenen, M, Kirkinen, P, et al. Perinatal diagnostic evaluation of velamentous and umbilical cord insertion: clinical, Doppler, and ultrasonic findings. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 112–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasegawa, J, Matsuoka, R, Ichizuka, K, et al. Velamentous cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus is associated with intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 425–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings (NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. [SMA] 14–4863). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.Google Scholar
Tan, CH, Denny, CH, Cheal, NE, et al. Alcohol use and binge drinking among women of childbearing age – United States, 2011–2013. MMWR 2015; 64(37): 1042–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelly, RH, Zatzick, DF, Anders, TF. The detection and treatment of psychiatric disorders and substance use among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 158(2): 213–9.Google Scholar
Briggs, GG, Freeman, RK,Yaffe, SJ. Introduction. In Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation, 9th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2011: xv–xxii.Google Scholar
Kraemer, K. Placental transfer of drugs. Neonatal Netw 1997; 16: 65–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahone, PR, Scott, K, Sleggs, G, et al. Cocaine and metabolites in amniotic fluid may prolong fetal drug exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 465–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brent, RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 957–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konijnenberg, C. Methodological issues in assessing the impact of prenatal drug exposure. Substance Abuse Res Treat 2015; 9(S2): 39–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, SR. Cocaine babies: a result of multiple teratogenic influences. J Child Neurol 1994; 9: 227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemoine, P, Harousseau, H, Borteyru, JP, et al. Les enfants des parents alcoholiques: anomolies observees a propos de 127 cas (The children of alcoholic parents: anomalies observed in 127 cases). Quest Med 1968; 25: 476–82.Google Scholar
Jones, KL, Smith, DW, Ulleland, CN, Streissguth, AP. Pattern of malformation in offspring of chronic alcoholic mothers. Lancet 1973; 301(7815): 1267–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, K, Howe, C, Battaglia, F, eds. Institute of Medicine Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment. Washington: National Academy Press; 1996.Google Scholar
May, PA, Keaster, C, Bozeman, R, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of fetal alcohol syndrome and partial fetal alcohol syndrome in a Rocky Mountain region city. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 155: 118–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, PA, Baete, A, Russo, J, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2014; 134(5): 855–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, PA, Blankenship, J, Marais, AS, et al. Approaching the prevalence of the full spectrum of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in a South African population-based study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013; 37(5): 818–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health C. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: how widespread are they in Canada? Available at: www.camh.ca/en/hospital/about_camh/newsroom/news_releases_media_advisories_and_backgrounders/current_year/Pages/Fetal-Alcohol-Spectrum-Disorders-How-Widespread-Are-They-in-Canada.aspx (accessed March 29, 2016).Google Scholar
Abel, EL, Sokol, RJ. A revised conservative estimate of the incidence of FAS and its economic impact. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991; 15(3): 514–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwood, H. Updating Estimates of the Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Updated Methods and Data. Report Prepared by the Lewin Group. Bethesda, MD:National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2000.Google Scholar
Stade, BC, Ali, A, Bennett, D, et al. The burden of prenatal exposure to alcohol: revised measurement of cost. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2009; 16: e91–102.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, JF, Smith, VC; Committee on Substance Abuse. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2015; 136(5): e1395–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyme, HE, May, PA, Kalberg, WO, et al. A practical clinical approach to diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: clarification of the 1996 institute of medicine criteria. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astley, SJ, Clarren, SK. Diagnosing the full spectrum of fetal alcohol-exposed individuals: introducing the 4-digit diagnostic code. Alcohol Alcohol 2000; 35: 400–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. A Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013: 798–801.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: Guidelines for Referral and Diagnosis. Atlanta:CDC, 2004.Google Scholar
Chudley, AE, Conry, J, Cook, JL, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. CMAJ 2005; 172: S1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, JL, Green, CR, Lilley, CM, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a guideline for diagnosis across the lifespan. CMAJ 2015; 188(3): 191–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoyme, HE, Kalberg, WO, Elliott, AJ, et al. Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosing fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2016; 138(2):pii: e20154256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swayze, VW, Johnson, VP, Hanson, JW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain anomalies in fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 232–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattson, SN, Schoenfeld, AM, Riley, EP. Teratogenic effects of alcohol on brain and behavior. Alcohol Res Health 2001; 25(3): 185–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Spadoni, AD, McGee, CL, Fryer, SL, Riley, EP. Neuroimaging and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007; 31(2): 239–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, JL, Jacobson, SW, Sokol, RJ, et al. Effects of alcohol use, smoking and illicit drug use on fetal growth in black infants. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 757–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charness, ME, Safran, RM, Perides, G. Ethanol inhibits neural cell-cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 9304–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeJonge, MH, Zachman, RD. The effect of maternal ethanol ingestion on fetal rat heart vitamin A: a model for fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatr Res 1995; 37: 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naus, CCG, Bechberger, JF. Effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on postnatal neural gene expression in the rat. Dev Genet 1991; 12: 293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MW. Prenatal exposure to ethanol delays the schedule and rate of migration of neurons to rat somatosensory cortex. In Fifth Congress of the International Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ISBRA). Denver: ISBRA, 1990.Google Scholar
Holzman, C, Paneth, N, Little, R, et al. Perinatal brain injury in premature infants born to mothers using alcohol in pregnancy. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armant, DR, Saunders, DE. Exposure of embryonic cells to alcohol: contrasting effects during preimplantation and postimplantation development. Semin Perinatol 1996; 20: 127–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahlgren, SC, Thakur, V, Bronner-Fraser, M. Sonic hedgehog rescues cranial neural crest from cell death induced by ethanol exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 10476–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, Y, Yang, PH, Ng, SSM, et al. A critical role of Pax6 in alcohol induced fetal microcephaly. Neurobiol Dis 2004; 16: 370–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrisman, K, Kenney, R, Comin, J, et al. Gestational ethanol exposure disrupts the expression of Fgf8 and Sonic hedgehog during limb patterning. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004; 70: 163–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veazey, KJ, Parnell, SE, Miranda, RC, Golding, MC. Dose-dependent alcohol-induced alterations in chromatin structure persist beyond the window of exposure and correlate with fetal alcohol syndrome birth defects. Epigenet Chromatin 2015; 8: 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, ML, Diehl, EJ, Laufer, BI, et al. Long-term genomic and epigenomic dysregulation as a consequence of prenatal alcohol exposure: a model for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Front Genet 2014; 5: 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, EA, Sarkar, DK. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and their transmission through genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Front Genet 2014; 5: 154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druse, MJ, Kuo, A, Tajuddin, N. Effects of in utero ethanol exposure on the developing serotonergic system. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1991; 15: 678–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinazo-Duran, MD, Renau-Piqueras, J, Guerri, C. Developmental changes in the optic nerve related to ethanol consumption in pregnant rats: analysis of the ethanol-exposed optic nerve. Teratology 1993; 48: 305–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, MW, Gerkin, KP. Hearing disorders in children with fetal alcohol syndrome: findings from case reports. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syslak, PH, Nathaniel, EJH, Novak, C, et al. Fetal alcohol effects on the postnatal development of the rat myocardium:an ultrastructural and morphometric analysis. Exp Mol Pathol 1994; 60: 158–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gage, JC, Sulik, KK. Pathogenesis of ethanol-induced hydronephrosis and hydroureter as demonstrated following in vivo exposure of mouse embryos. Teratology 1991; 44: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Autti-Rämö, I, Fagerlund, A, Ervalahti, N, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Finland: clinical delineation of 77 older children and adolescents. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140: 137–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Day, NL, Richardson, G, Robles, N, et al. Effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on growth and morphology of offspring at 8 months of age. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 748–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breese, CR, D’Costa, A, Ingram, RL, et al. Long-term suppression of insulin-like growth factor-1 in rats after in utero ethanol exposure:relationship to somatic growth. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 264: 448–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauceri, HJ, Lee, W, Conway, S. Effect of ethanol on insulin-like growth factor-II release from fetal organs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1994; 18: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, W, Gregg, JP, Fonkalsrud, EW. Effect of maternal ethanol intake on fetal rabbit gastrointestinal development. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 1030–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Breastfeeding: Maternal and Infant Aspects (Educational Bulletin Number 258). Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.Google Scholar
Little, RE, Anderson, KW, Ervin, CH, et al. Maternal alcohol use during breast-feeding and infant mental and motor development at one year. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 425–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, JM, Hanson, JW, Darby, BL, et al. Independent dysmorphology evaluations at birth and 4 years of age for children exposed to varying amounts of alcohol in utero. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 772–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Streissguth, AP. The behavioral teratology of alcohol: performance, behavioral, and intellectual deficits in prenatally exposed children. In West, JR, ed., Alcohol and Brain Development. New York:Oxford University Press, 1986: 3–44.Google Scholar
Streissguth, AP, Aase, JM, Clarren, SK, et al. Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. JAMA 1991; 265: 1961–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkland, SA, Dodds, LA, Brosky, G. The natural history of smoking during pregnancy among women in Nova Scotia. CMAJ 2000; 163: 281–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Tong, VT, England, LJ, Dietz, PM, Asare, LA. Smoking patterns and use of cessation interventions during pregnancy. Am J Prevent Med 2008; 35: 327–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, VT, Jones, JR, Dietz, PM, et al. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy: pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), United States, 31 Sites, 2000–2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2009; 58: 1–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, LJ, Lupo, PJ. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34: 398–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secker-Walker, RH, Vacek, PM, Flynn, BS, et al. Smoking in pregnancy, exhaled carbon monoxide, and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 648–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visnjevac, V, Mikov, M. Smoking and carboxyhemoglobin concentrations in mothers and their newborn infants. Toxicology 1986; 5: 175–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Jazayeri, A, Tsibris, JCM, Spellacy, WN. Umbilical cord plasma erythropoietin levels in pregnancies complicated by maternal smoking. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 433–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordanov, JS. Cotinine concentrations in amniotic fluid and urine of smoking, passive smoking and non-smoking pregnant women at term and in the urine of their neonates on the 1st day of life. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 149: 734–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, IM, Plocienik, K, Stahle, S, et al. Impact of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 883–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, KL, Stroud, LR, LaGasse, LL, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and newborn neurobehavior. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1318–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardy, AH, Seppälä, T, Lillsunde, P, et al. Objectively measured tobacco exposure during pregnancy: neonatal effects and relation to maternal smoking. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 721–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, IM, Mongeon, JA, Badger, GJ, et al. Maternal smoking and its association with birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 986–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cliver, SP, Goldenberg, RL, Cutter, GR, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on neonatal anthropometric measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 625–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermann, M, King, K, Weitzman, M. Prenatal tobacco smoke and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure and child neurodevelopment. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20: 184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bada, HS, Das, A, Bauer, CR, et al. Low birth weight and preterm births: etiologic fraction attributable to prenatal drug exposure. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 631–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnik, R, Brink, GW, Wilkes, M. Catecholamine-mediated reduction in uterine blood flow after nicotine infusion in the pregnant ewe. J Clin Invest 1979; 63: 1133–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, GJ, Palmer, ME, Dalton, KJ. Morphometric differences between the placental vasculature of non-smokers, smokers and ex-smokers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 907–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, LG, Clausen, HV, Jonsson, L. Stereologic examination of placentas from mothers who smoke during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 531–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabrial, R, Alsat, E, Evain-Brion, D. Alteration of epidermal growth factor receptor in placental membranes of smokers: relationship with intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1238–43.Google Scholar
Slotkin, TA, McCook, EC, Lappi, SE, et al. Altered development of basal and forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in brain regions of rats exposed to nicotine prenatally. Dev Brain Res 1992; 68: 233–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury, MJ, Gomez-Frias, M, Mulinare, J. Does maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy cause cleft lip and palate in offspring? Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 333–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, PM, Dervan, LA, Reiger, S, et al. Risk of congenital heart defects in the offspring of smoking mothers: a population-based study. J Pediatr 2015; 166: 978–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacksaw, A, Rodeck, C, Boniface, S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Luther, ER. Maternal cigarette smoking as a risk factor for placental abruption, placenta previa, and uterine bleeding in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 881–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castles, A, Adams, K, Melvin, CL, et al. Effects of smoking during pregnancy: five meta-analyses. Am J Prevent Med 1999; 16: 208–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeye, RL. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa: frequency, perinatal mortality, and cigarette smoking. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 701–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Getahun, D, Peltier, MR, et al. Placental abruption in term and preterm gestations: evidence for heterogeneity in clinical pathways. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 785–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zdravkovic, T, Genbacev, O. McMaster, MT, Fisher, SJ. The adverse effects of maternal smoking on the human placenta: a review. Placenta 2005; 26A: S81–6.Google Scholar
Usta, IM, Hobeika, EM, Musa, AA, et al. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1045–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabet, C, Ancel, PY, Burguet, A, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and preterm birth according to obstetric history: French national perinatal surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19: 88–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salihu, HM, Sharma, PP, Getahun, G. Prenatal tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: a case-control and bidirectional case–crossover study. Nicotine Tobac Res 2008; 10: 159–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Varner, MW, Silver, RM, Rowland, CJ, et al. Association between stillbirth and illicit drug use and smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 113–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marufu, TC, Ahankari, A, Coleman, T, Lewis, S. Maternal smoking and the risk of stillbirth: systemic review and meta-analysis. BMS Public Health 2015; 15: 239–53.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377: 1331–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbeille, P, Bosc, M, Vaillant, MC, et al. Nicotine-induced changes in the cerebral circulation in ovine fetuses. Am J Perinatol 1992; 79: 645–8.Google Scholar
Lei, F, Yan, X, Zhao, F. Impairment of central chemoreception in neonatal rats induced by maternal cigarette smoke exposure during pregnancy. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0137362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, P, Groswasser, J, Hassid, S, et al. Prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking is associated with a decrease in arousal in infants. J Pediatr 1999; 135: 34–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, HJ, Hillman, LS. Epidemiology of the sudden infant death syndrome: maternal, neonatal, and postneonatal risk factors. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 717–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takashima, S, Armstrong, D, Becker, LE, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion in the sudden infant death syndrome, brainstem gliosis and vasculature. Ann Neurol 1978; 4: 257–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezzacappa, E, Buckner, JC, Earls, F. Prenatal cigarette exposure and infant learning stimulation as predictors of cognitive control in childhood. Dev Sci 2011; 14: 881–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drews, CD, Murphy, CC, Yeargin-Allsop, M, et al. The relationship between idiopathic mental retardation and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 547–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, DL, Henderson, CR, Tatelbaum, R. Intellectual impairment in children of women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 221–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelius, MD, De Genna, NM, Leech, SL, et al. Effects of prenatal cigarette smoke exposure on neurobehavioral outcomes in 10-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011; 33: 137–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelius, MD, Goldschmidt, L, De Genna, NM, Larkby, C. Long-term effects of prenatal cigarette smoke exposure on behavior dysregulation among 14-year-old offspring of teenage mothers. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16: 694–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelius, MD, Goldschmidt, L, Day, NL. Prenatal cigarette smoking: long term effects on young adult behavior problems and smoking behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2012; 34: 554–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, M, Moolchan, ET, Robisnon, ML. Behavioral and neural consequences of prenatal exposure to nicotine. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 630–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polanska, K, Jurewicz, J, Hanke, W. Smoking and alcohol drinking during pregnancy as the risk factors for poor child neurodevelopment: a review of epidemiological studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2015; 28: 419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, EM, Savitz, DA, Sandler, DP. Prenatal exposure to parents’ smoking and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlton, A. Children and passive smoking: a review. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 267–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Paulson, RB, Shanfeld, J, Mullet, D, et al. Prenatal smokeless tobacco effects on the rat fetus. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1994; 14: 16–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Inamdar, AS, Croucher, RE, Chokhandre, MK, et al. Maternal smokeless tobacco use in pregnancy and adverse heatlh outcomes in newborns: a systematic review. Nicotine Tobac Res 2015; 17: 1058–66.Google Scholar
England, LJ, Kim, SY, Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, et al. Effects of maternal smokeless tobacco use on selected pregnancy outcomes in Alaska Native women: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2013; 92: 648–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnerbeck, A, Edstedt Bonamy, AK, Wikstrom, AK, et al. Maternal snuff use and smoking and the risk of oral cleft malformations: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e84715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnerbeck, A, Wikstrom, AK, Edstedt Bonamy, AK, et al. Relationship of maternal snuff and cigarette smoking with neonatal apnea. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 503–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, M, Breland, A, Spindle, T, Eissenberg, T. Clinical case conference electronic cigarettes: a review of safety and clinical issues. J Addict Med 2014; 8: 234–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breland, A, Spindle, T, Weaver, M, Eissenberg, T. Science and electronic cigarettes: current data, future needs. J Addict Med 2014; 8: 223–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suter, MA, Mastrobattista, J, Sachs, M, Aagaard, K. Is there evidence for potential harm of electronic cigarette use in pregnancy? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103: 186–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, KS, Farquhar, B, Chisolm, MS, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of electronic cigarette use among pregnant women. J Addict Med 2015; 9: 266–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrea, EM, Knapp, DK, Romera, A, et al. Meconium analysis to assess fetal exposure to nicotine by active and passive maternal smoking. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 471–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, BO, Hong, YC, Park, H, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy and infantile development. Environ Res 2011; 111: 539–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makin, J, Fried, PA, Watkinson, B. A comparison of active and passive smoking during pregnancy: long-term effects. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1991; 13: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J, Leung, PW, McCauley, L, et al. Mother’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy and externalizing behavior problems in children. Neurotoxicology 2013; 34: 167–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witschi, H, Lundgaard, SM, Rajini, P, et al. Effects of exposure to nicotine and to sidestream smoke on pregnancy outcome in rats. Toxicol Lett 1994; 71: 279–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, DL. Paternal smoking and fetal health. Lancet 1991; 337: 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klonoff-Cohen, HS, Edelstein, SL, Lefkowitz, ES, et al. The effect of passive smoking and tobacco exposure through breast milk on sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA 1995; 273: 795–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, S, Rosenthal, DG, Sherman, S, et al. Physical, behavioral, and cognitive effects of prenatal tobacco and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2014; 44: 219–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Selden, BS, Clark, RF, Curry, SC. Marijuana. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990; 8: 8527–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, TC, Tashkin, DP, Djahed, B, et al. Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelius, MD, Taylor, PM, Geva, D, et al. Prenatal tobacco and marijuana use among adolescents: effects on offspring gestational age, growth, and morphology. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 738–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, DR, Hulse, GK, Milne, E, et al. Maternal cannabis use and birth weight: a meta-analysis. Addiction 1997; 92: 1553–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, PA, Watkinson, B, Gray, R. Growth from birth to early adolescence in offspring prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marijuana. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1999; 21: 513–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, PA, Makin, JE. Neonatal behavioral correlates of prenatal exposure to marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol in a low risk population. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1987; 9: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, RE, Scher, MS, Williamson, DE, et al. A longitudinal study of prenatal marijuana use: effects on sleep and arousal at age 3 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149: 145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, PA. Prenatal exposure to marijuana and tobacco during infancy, early and middle childhood: effects and an attempt at synthesis. Arch Toxicol Suppl 1995; 17: 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, PA. The Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS): methodologic issues and findings. It’s easy to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Life Sci 1995; 56: 2159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campolongo, P, Trezza, V, Palmery, M, et al. Developmental exposure to cannabinoids causes subtle and enduring neurofunctional alterations. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 85: 117–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, M. Cannabis use in pregnancy and early life and its consequences: animal models. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 259: 383–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiNieri, JA, Wang, X, Szutorisz, H, et al. Maternal cannabis use alters ventral striatal dopamine D2 gene regulation in the offspring. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70: 763–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spano, MS, Ellgren, M, Wang, X, Hurd, YL. Prenatal cannabis exposure increases heroin seeking with allostatic changes in limbic enkephalin systems in adulthood. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61: 554–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrar, HC, Kearns, GL. Cocaine: clinical pharmacology and toxicology. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 665–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, DN. Cocaine and cocaethylene binding to human placenta in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 527–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, KL. Developmental pathogenesis of defects associated with prenatal cocaine exposure: fetal vascular disruption. Clin Perinatol 1991; 18: 139–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, LT, Arendt, R, Minnes, S, et al. Cognitive and motor outcomes of cocaine-exposed infants. JAMA. 2002; 287(15): 1952–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, DA, Augustyn, M, Knight, WG, et al. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA. 2001; 285(12): 1613–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandstra, ES, Morrow, CE, Anthony, JC, et al. Intrauterine growth of full-term infants: impact of prenatal cocaine exposure. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 1309–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, DA, Chiriboga, CA. Dose-response effect of cocaine on newborn head circumference. Pediatrics 2000; 106: e33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, L, Kline, J, Ng, S, et al. Cocaine use during pregnancy and intrauterine growth retardation: new insights based on maternal hair tests. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 112–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinsmoor, MJ, Irons, SJ, Christmas, JT. Preterm rupture of the membranes associated with recent cocaine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 305–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kliegman, RM, Madura, D, Kiwi, R, et al. Relation of maternal cocaine use to the risks of prematurity and low birth weight. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 751–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iriye, BK, Bristow, RE, Hsu, CD, et al. Uterine rupture associated with recent antepartum cocaine abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 840–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Macones, GA, Sehdev, HM, Parry, S, et al. The association between maternal cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1097–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czyrko, C, Del Pin, CA, O’Neill, JA, et al. Maternal cocaine abuse and necrotizing enterocolitis: outcome and survival. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 414–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Büyükünal, C, Kiliç, N, Dervisoglu, S, et al. Maternal cocaine abuse resulting in necrotizing enterocolitis: an experimental study in a rat model. Acta Paediatr 1994; 396: 91–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Chasnoff, IJ, Bussey, ME, Savich, R, et al. Perinatal cerebral infarction and maternal cocaine use. J Pediatr 1986; 108: 456–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, LT, Yamashita, TS, Hawkins, S, et al. Increased incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and developmental delay in cocaine-exposed, very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 765–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sims, ME, Walther, FJ. Antenatal brain injury and maternal cocaine use. J Perinatol 1989; 9: 349–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Behnke, M, Eyler, FD, Conlon, M, et al. Incidence and description of structural brain abnormalities in newborns exposed to cocaine. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 291–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mott, SH, Packer, RJ, Soldin, SJ. Neurologic manifestations of cocaine exposure in childhood. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 557–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C, Duara, S, Neto, GS, et al. Respiratory instability in neonates with in utero exposure to cocaine. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 111–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tronick, EZ, Frank, DA, Cabral, H, et al. Late dose-response effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on newborn neurobehavioral performance. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, K, Dodd, PA, Day, L, et al. Fetal catecholamine, cardiovascular, and neurobehavioral responses to cocaine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1616–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, S, Mandell, AJ. Narcotic drugs: effect on the serotonin biosynthetic systems of the brain. Science 1972; 177: 1209–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durand, DJ, Espinoza, AM, Nickerson, BG. Association between prenatal cocaine exposure and sudden infant death syndrome. J Pediatr 1990; 117: 909–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauchner, H, Zuckerman, B, McClain, M, et al. Risk of sudden infant death syndrome among infants with in utero exposure to cocaine. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 831–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayes, LC, Granger, RH, Frank, MA, et al. Neurobehavioral profiles of neonates exposed to cocaine prenatally. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 778–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisen, LN, Field, TM, Bandstra, ES, et al. Perinatal cocaine effects on neonatal stress behavior and performance on the Brazelton scale. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 477–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Eyler, FD, Behnke, M, Conlon, M, et al. Birth outcome from a prospective, matched study of prenatal crack/cocaine use. I. Interactive and dose effects on health and growth. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 229–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Eyler, FD, Behnke, M, Conlon, M, et al. Birth outcome from a prospective, matched study of prenatal crack/cocaine use. II. Interactive and dose effects on neurobehavioral assessment. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 237–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Frank, DA, Augustyn, M, Knight, WG, et al. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA 2001; 285: 1613–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, EH, Volpe, JJ. Effect of maternal cocaine use on the fetus and newborn: review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosci 1989; 15: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oro, A, Dixon, S. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 571–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chasnoff, IJ, Lewis, DE, Squires, L. Cocaine intoxication in a breast-fed infant. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 836–8.Google Scholar
Chaney, NE, Franke, J, Waddington, WB. Cocaine convulsions in a breast-feeding baby. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 134–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulse, GK, Milne, E, English, DR, et al. The relationship between maternal use of heroin and methadone and infant birth weight. Addiction 1997; 92: 1571–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barg, J, Rius, A, Bem, WT, et al. Differential development of beta-endorphin and mu-opioid binding sites in mouse brain. Dev Brain Res 1992; 66: 71–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suguihara, C, Bancalari, E. Substance abuse during pregnancy: effects on respiratory function in the infant. Semin Perinatol 1991; 15: 302–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Olson, GD, Lees, MH. Ventilatory response to carbon dioxide of infants following chronic prenatal methadone exposure. J Pediatr 1980; 96: 983–9.Google Scholar
Bunikowski, R, Grimmer, I, Heiser, A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome after prenatal exposure to opiates. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157: 724–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smialek, JE, Monforte, JR, Aronow, R, et al. Methadone deaths in children: a continuing problem. JAMA 1977; 238: 2516–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics. Transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 924–36.Google Scholar
Guo, X, Spencer, JW, Suess, PE, et al. Cognitive brain potential alterations in boys exposed to opiates: in utero and lifestyle comparisons. Addict Behav 1994; 19: 429–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, RW, Tzioumi, D, Collins, E, Jeffery, HE. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of infants exposed to opiate in-utero. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, JE, Suess, PE, Newlin, DB, et al. Vagal tone regulation during sustained attention in boys exposed to opiates in utero. Addict Behav 1995; 20: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornoy, A, Michailevskaya, V, Lukashov, I, et al. The developmental outcome of children born to heroin-dependent mothers, raised at home or adopted. Child Abuse Negl 1996; 20: 385–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ornoy, A, Segal, J, Bar-Hamburger, R, Greenbaum, C. Developmental outcome of school-age children born to mothers with heroin dependency: importance of environmental factors. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 668–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Idänpäan-Heikkilä, JE, Jouppila, PI, Puolakka, JO, et al. Placental transfer and fetal metabolism of diazepam in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 1011–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laegreid, L, Olegärd, R, Walström, J, et al. Teratogenic effects of benzodiazepine use during pregnancy. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 126–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikner, BN, Stiller, C-O, Bergman, U, et al. Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists during pregnancy: neonatal outcome and congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16: 1203–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Eros, E, Czeizel, AE, Rockenbauer, M, et al. A population-based case control teratologic study of nitrazepam, medazepam, tofisopam, alprazolum and clonazepam treatment during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 101: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellantuono, C, Tofani, S, Di Sciascio, G, Santone, G. Benzodiazepine exposure in pregnancy and risk of major malformations: a critical overview. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013; 35: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ban, L, West, J, Gibson, JE, Fiaschi, L, et al. First trimester exposure to anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs and the risks of major congenital anomalies: a United Kingdom population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e100996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okun, ML, Ebert, R, Saini, B. A review of sleep-promoting medications used in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 428–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iqbal, MM, Sobhan, T, Ryals, T. Effects of commonly used benzodiazepines on the fetus, the neonate, and the nursing infant. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, B, Reis, M. Neonatal complications after maternal concomitant use of SSRI and other central nervous system active drugs during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012; 32: 608–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessens, AB, Cohen-Kettenis, PT, Mellenbergh, GJ, et al. Association of prenatal phenobarbital and phenytoin exposure with small head size at birth and with learning problems. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 533–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verrotti, A, Scaparrotta, A, Cofini, M, et al. Developmental neurotoxicity and anticonvulsant drugs: a possible link. Reprod Toxicol 2014; 48: 72–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, ML, Van Zutphen, AR, Botto, LD, et al. Maternal butalbital use and selected defects in the national birth defects prevention study. Headache 2014; 54: 54–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rementeria, JL, Bhatt, K. Withdrawal symptoms in neonates from intrauterine exposure to diazepam. J Pediatr 1977; 90: 123–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izquierdo, LA, Yonke, N. Fetal surveillance in late pregnancy and during labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2014; 41: 307–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladhani, NN, Shah, PS, Murphy, KE. Prenatal amphetamine exposure and birth outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gyncol 2011; 205(219): e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stek, AM, Baker, RS, Fisher, BK, et al. Fetal responses to maternal and fetal methamphetamine administration in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1592–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, R, Diaz, SD, Arria, A, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and short-term maternal and fetal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 391–400.Google Scholar
Plessinger, MA. Prenatal exposure to amphetamines: risks and adverse outcomes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 119–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganapathy, V, Ramamoorthy, S, Leibach, FH. Transport and metabolism of monoamines in the human placenta. Trophoblast Res 1993; 7: 35–51.Google Scholar
Ganapathy, VV, Prasad, PD, Ganapathy, ME, Leibach, FH. Drugs of abuse and placental transport. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1999; 38: 99–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, TE, Schuetter, R, Tellei, J, Sauvage, L. Methamphetamines and pregnancy outcome. J Addict Med 2015; 9: 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottalico, B, Larson, I, Brodszicki, J, et al. Norepinephrine transporter (NET), serotonin transporter (SERT), vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) and organic cation transporters (OCT1, 2 and EMT) in human placenta from pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Placenta 2004; 25: 518–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathy, V. Drugs of abuse and human placenta. Life Sci 2011; 88: 926–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorman, MC, Orme, KS, Nguyen, NT, et al. Outcomes in pregnancies complicated by methamphetamine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(429): e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, FH, Turnquest Wells, MA. Management of the patient in labor who has abused substances. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56: 166–72.Google Scholar
Ericksson, M, Larsson, C, Zetterström, R. Amphetamine addiction and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1981; 60: 253–9.Google Scholar
Arria, AM, Derauf, C, LaGasse, LL, et al. Methamphetamine and other substance use during pregnancy: preliminary estimates from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle (IDEAL) study. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasif, FJ, Cuadra, GR, Ramirez, OA. Permanent alteration of cerebral noradrenergic system by prenatally administered amphetamine. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1999; 112: 181–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavares, MA, Silva, MC. Differential effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine and amphetamine on growth parameters and morphometry of the prefrontal cortex in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 1996; 801: 256–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavares, MA, Silva, MC, Silva-Araujo, A, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to amphetamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. Int J Dev Neurosci 1996; 14: 585–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, L, Smith, LM, LoPresti, C, et al. Smaller subcortical volumes and cognitive deficits in children with prenatal methamphetamine exposure. Psychiatry Res 2004; 132: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, SD, Bejar, R. Echoencephalographic findings in neonates associated with maternal cocaine and methamphetamine use: incidence and clinical correlates. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 770–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElhatton, PR, Pughe, KR, Evans, C, et al. Is exposure to amphetamine-like drugs in pregnancy associated with malformations? J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38: 195–6.Google Scholar
Torfs, CP, Velie, EM, Oechsli, FW, et al. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demographic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology 1994:50: 44–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holbrook, BD, Rayburn, WF. Teratogenic risks from exposure to illicit drugs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41: 229–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forrester, MB, Merz, RD. Risk of selected birth defects with prenatal illicit drug use, Hawaii, 1986–2002. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2007; 70: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, BB, Snell, LM, Gilstrap, LC. Methamphetamine abuse during pregnancy: outcome and fetal effects. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 541–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Oei, J, Abdel-Latif, ME, Clark, R, et al. Short-term outcomes of mothers and infants exposed to antenatal amphetamines. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95: F36–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, D, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. Intrauterine growth of infants exposed to prenatal methamphetamine: results from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle study. J Pediatr 2010; 157: 337–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, Derauf, C, et al. The infant development, environment, and lifestyle study: effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure, polydrug exposure, and poverty on intrauterine growth. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1149–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oro, AS, Dixon, SP. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 571–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, LM, Diaz, S, LaGasse, LL, et al. Developmental and behavioral consequences of prenatal methamphetamine exposure: a review of the infant development, environment, and lifestyle (IDEAL) study. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2015; 51: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiblawi, ZN, Smith, LM, Diaz, SD, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal and infant neurobehavioral outcome: results from the IDEAL study. Subst Abus 2014; 35: 68–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, M, Smith, VC. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e1009–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabaneh, R, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. The effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on childhood growth patterns from birth to 3 years of age. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 203–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Diaz, SD, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on behavioral and cognitive findings at 7.5 years of age. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 1333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cernerud, L, Eriksson, M, Jonsson, B, et al. Amphetamine addiction during pregnancy: 14-year follow-up of growth and school performance. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 204–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaGasse, LL, Derauf, C, Smith, LL, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and childhood behavior problems at 3 and 5 years of age. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 681–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwiatkowski, MA, Roos, A, Stein, DJ, et al. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure: a review of cognitive and neuroimaging studies. Metab Brain Dis 2014; 29: 245–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holbrook, BD, Rayburn, WF. Teratogenic risks from exposure to illicit drugs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41: 229–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, CE, Loomis, GA. Recognition and prevention of inhalant abuse. Am Fam Physician 2003; 68: 869–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Linden, CH. Volatile substances of abuse. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990; 8: 559–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheeres, JJ, Chudley, AE. Solvent abuse in pregnancy: a perinatal perspective. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2001; 24: 22–6.Google Scholar
Geary, FH, Turnquist Wells, MA. Management of the patient in labor who has abuse substances. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 166–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, HE, Balster, RL. Inhalant abuse in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 153–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannigan, JH, Bowen, SE. Reproductive toxicology and teratology of abused toluene. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010; 56: 184–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghantous, H, Danielsson, BRG. Placental transfer and distribution of toluene, xylene, and benzene and their metabolites during gestation in mice. Biol Res Pregnancy 1986; 7: 98–105.Google ScholarPubMed
Stoltenbeurg-Didinger, G, Altenkirch, H, Wagner, M. Neurotoxicity of organic solvent mixtures: embryotoxicity and fetotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1990; 12: 585–9.Google Scholar
Gospe, SM, Zhou, SS. Prenatal exposure to toluene results in abnormal neurogenesis and migration in rat somatosensory cortex. Pediatr Res 2000; 47: 362–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gospe, SM, Zhou, SS. Toluene abuse embryopathy: longitudinal neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to toluene in rats. Reprod Toxicol 1998; 12: 119–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, SE, Hannigan, JH. Developmental toxicity of prenatal exposure to toluene. AAPS J 2006; 8: E419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, SE, Batis, JC, Mohammadi, MH, Hannigan, JH. Abuse pattern of gestational toluene exposure and early postnatal development in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2005; 27: 105–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, MA, Hoyme, HE, Seaver, LH, et al. Toluene embryopathy: delineation of the phenotype and comparison with fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 211–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, GL, Kirby, RS, Langendoerfer, S, Wilkins-Haug, L. Toluene embryopathy: clinical delineation and developmental follow-up. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 216–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, SE. Two serious and challenging medical complications associated with volatile substance misuse: sudden sniffing death and fetal solvent syndrome. Subst Use Misuse 2011; 46: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boynukalin, FK, Baykal, C. Prenatal diagnosis of multiple fetal anomalies in naphthalene-addicted pregnant women: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2014; 41: 217–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutzman, DL, Frankenfield-Chernicoff, M, Clatterbaugh, HE, et al. Incidence of intrauterine cocaine exposure in a suburban setting. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 825–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasnoff, IJ, Landres, HJ, Barrett, ME. The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1202–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrar, HC, Kearns, GL. Cocaine: clinical pharmacology and toxicology. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 665–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, RM, Wagner, CL, Schultz, JM, et al. Meconium analysis for improved identification of infants exposed to cocaine in utero. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 435–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saitoh, M, Uzuka, M, Sakamoto, M. Rate of hair growth. Adv Biol Skin 1969; 9: 183–201.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, WA, Hill, VA, Bland, WH. Hair analysis for drug abuse. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 1433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, PR, Tippetts, AS, Branch, DG. Cocaine in the hair of mother-infant pairs: quantitative analysis and correlations with urine measurements and self report. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19: 159–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Walker, JJ. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2000; 356: 1260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, EK, McCain, CL, Morton, CH, et al. Pregnancy related mortality in California: causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 938–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy: report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 1122–31.Google Scholar
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, LK, Velten, M. Maternal inflammation, growth retardation, and preterm birth: insights into adult cardiovascular disease. Life Sci 2011; 89: 417–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markham, KB, Funai, EF. Pregnancy-related hypertension. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al., eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2014: 856–81.Google Scholar
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia (American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin Number 33), ACOG, Washington, DC, 2002 (reaffirmed 2012).Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Mercer, BM, D’Alton, M, et al. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 323–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abalos, A, Duley, L, Steyn, DW. Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2: CD002252Google Scholar
Magee, L.A., Elran, E., Bull, S.B., et al: Risks and benefits of beta receptor blockers for pregnancy hypertension: overview of the randomized trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88: 15–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, LA, von Dadelszen, P, Rey, E, et al. The control of hypertension in pregnancy study (CHIPS) randomized controlled trial. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchbinder, A, Sibai, BM, Caritis, S, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saudan, P, Brown, MA, Buddle, ML, et al. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 1177–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y, Xiong, X, Fraser, WD, et al. Association of uric acid with progression to preeclampsia and development of adverse conditions in gestational hypertensive pregnancies. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25: 711–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM. Eclampsia. VI. Maternal-perinatal outcome in 254 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1049–54.Google ScholarPubMed
North, RA, Taylor, RS, Schellenberg, JC. Evaluation of a definition of preeclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 767–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woelkers, D, Barton, J, von Dadelszen, P, et al. Rates of adverse outcomes are elevated in preterm patients with suspected hypertensive disorders without diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abalos, E, Cuesta, C, Grosso, AL, et al. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM, Barton, JR. Expectant management of severe preeclampsia remote from term: patient selection, treatment, and delivery indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 514.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005; 365: 785–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, A, Rana, S, Karumanchi, SA. Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology 2009; 24: 147–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ness, RB, Sibai, BM. Shared and disparate components of the pathophysiologies of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gyncol 2006; 195: 40–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM. Management of late preterm and early-term pregnancies complicated by mild gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2011; 35: 292–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bombrys, AE, Barton, JR, Nowacki, EA, et al. Expectant management of severe pre-eclampsia at less than 27 weeks’ gestation: maternal and perinatal outcomes according to gestational age by weeks at onset of expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 247.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibai, BM. Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in preeclampsia: lessons learned from recent trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1520–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altman, D, Carroli, G, Duley, L, et al. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulfate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 1: 1877–90.Google Scholar
Resnik, R, Creasy, RK. Intrauterine growth restriction. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al., eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2014: 743–55.Google Scholar
Friedman, SA, Schiff, E, Kao, L, et al. Neonatal outcome after preterm delivery for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1785–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendola, P, Mumford, SL, Mannisto, TI, et al. Controlled direct effects of preeclampsia on neonatal health after accounting for mediation by preterm birth. Epidemiology 2015; 26: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riaz, M, Porat, R, Brodsky, NL, et al. The effects of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on newborns: a prospective controlled study. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 449–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, MB, Penn, AA, Whitaker, KR, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate exposure on term neonates. J Perinatol 2013; 33: 188–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouse, D, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constantine, MM, Weiner, SJ. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 354–64.Google Scholar
Duley, L, Meher, S, Jones, L. Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD001449.Google Scholar
Cooper, WO, Hernandez-Diaz, S, Arbogast, PG, et al. Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2443–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, LA, Cham, C, Waterman, EJ, et al. Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 955–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome (2nd edn.) Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(4): 896–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Births: Final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2014. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2012. In National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 62, no 9. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2013. Available from www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_09.pdf (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar
March of Dimes. Peri stats: births by method of delivery, 1994–2004. 2006. Available at www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/ (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, AB, Cahill, AG, Guise, JM, Rouse, DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(3): 179–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Cesarean delivery on maternal request (Committee Opinion No. 559). Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121(4): 904–7.Google Scholar
Villar, J, Carroli, G, Zavaleta, N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007; 335: 1025–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deneux-Tharaux, C, Carmona, E, Bouvier-Colle, MH, Breart, G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 541–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisenblat, V, Barak, S, Griness, OB, et al. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, SA, Grobman, WA, Landon, MB. Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(1): 11–20.Google Scholar
Liu, S, Liston, RM, Joseph, KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ 2007; 176: 455–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennare, R, Tucker, G, Heard, A, et al. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 270–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, KD, Jackson, S, Korst, L, Fridman, M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012; 29:7–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG, Bangdiwala, SI, Brown, SS, et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2010; 27(3): 1–42.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery (Practice Bulletin No. 115). Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(2 Pt 1): 450–63.Google Scholar
Grobman, WA, Lai, Y, Landon, MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 806–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peaceman, AM, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Thom, E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, ES, Grobman, WA. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(1): 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyamfi, C, Juhasz, G, Gyamfi, P, et al. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 639–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bujold, E, Goyet, M, Marcoux, S, Brassard, N, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(1): 43–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberge, S, Chaillet, N, Boutin, A, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115(1): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Stamilio, DM, Odibo, AO, et al. Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 495.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, LM, Cahill, AG, Boslaugh, S, et al. Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206(1): 51.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kok, N, Wiersma, IC, Opmeer, BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(2): 132–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guise, JM, Denman, MA, Emeis, C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115(6): 1267–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisler, RE, Cohen, A, Ringer, SA, Lieberman, E. Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. Birth 2003; 30: 83–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spong, CY, Landon, MB, Gilbert, S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 801–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, HY, Chauhan, SP, Grobman, WA, et al. Association of labor induction or stimulation with infant mortality in women with failed versus successful trial of labor after prior cesarean. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26(12): 1162–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(3): 224–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, HE, Gurol-Urganci, I, van der Meulen, JH, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014; 121(2): 183–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uddin, SF, Simon, AE. Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17(7): 1309–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landon, MB, Leindecker, S, Spong, CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1016–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Stamilio, DM, Odibo, AO, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macario, A, El-Sayed, YY, Druzin, ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery depends on the a priori chance of success. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 378–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costantine, MM, Fox, K, Byers, BD, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(5): 1029–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, NE, Fu, R, Guise, J-M. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 262.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pare, E, Quinones, JN, Macones, GA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 2006; 113: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, SA, Grobman, WA, Landon, MB, et al. Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States. Value Health 2013; 16(6): 953–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guiliano, M, Closset, E, Therby, D, et al. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 179: 130–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Odibo, AO, Allsworth, JE, et al. Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202(4): 355.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catanzarite, V, Cousins, L, Dowling, D, et al. Oxytocin-associated rupture of an unscarred uterus in a primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (3 Pt 2): 723–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbins, KJ, Weber, T, Holmgren, CM, et al. Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(3): 382.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, CA, Baxi, LV. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62: 327–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 74: 69–76 (reaffirmed 2012).Google Scholar
O’Mahony, F, Hofmeyr, GJ, Menon, V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 10(11): CD005455.Google Scholar
Johnson, JH, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughey, AB, Sandberg, PL, Zlatnik, MG, et al. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 908–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schot, MJ, Halbertsma, FJ, Katgert, T, et al. Development of children with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage born after vacuum extraction. J Child Neurol 2013; 28(4): 520–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolderup, LB, Laros, RK, Musci, TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aiken, AR, Aiken, CE, Alberry, MS. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(3): 355.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tempest, N, Hart, A, Walkinshaw, S, et al. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG 2013; 120(10): 1277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhide, A, Guven, M, Prefumo, F, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20(7): 541–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lurie, S, Glezerman, M, Baider, C, et al. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274(1): 34–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towner, D, Castro, MA, Eby-Wilkens, E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1709–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardella, C, Taylor, M, Benedetti, T, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(4):896–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmody, F, Grant, A, Mutch, L, et al. Follow up of babies delivered in a randomized controlled comparison of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 763–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, RB, Heycock, E, Carter, J, et al. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomized, controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106(6): 544–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesley, BD, van den Berg, BJ, Reece, EA. The effect of forceps delivery on cognitive development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1091–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngan, HY, Miu, P, Ko, L, et al. Long-term neurological sequelae following vacuum extractor delivery. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 30: 111–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokol, RJ, Blackwell, SC. Shoulder dystocia (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 40). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 80: 87–92 (reaffirmed 2015).Google Scholar
Paris, AE, Greenberg, JA, Ecker, JL, McElrath, TF. Is an episiotomy necessary with a shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(217): e1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulvain, M, Senat, MV, Perrotin, F, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385(9987): 2600–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dajani, NK, Magann, EF. Complications of shoulder dystocia. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38(4): 201–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spain, JE, Frey, HA, Tuuli, MG, et al. Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(3): 353.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, A, Chau, CT, Pan, D, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: antepartum, intrapartum and demographic factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28(7): 793–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Hankins, GD, Dudley, DA, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1158–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Rouleau, J, Liu, S, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors, and impact on perinatal outcome. BJOG 2012; 119(7): 874–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Montz, FJ, Phelan, JP. Hemodynamic alterations associated with amniotic fluid embolism: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 617–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanayama, N, Tamura, N. Amniotic fluid embolism: pathophysiology and new strategies for management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40(6): 1507–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, F, Wang, L, Yang, W, et al. From appearance to essence: 10 years review of atypical amniotic fluid embolism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292(2): 329–34.Google Scholar
Benson, MD, Kobayashi, H, Silver, RK, et al. Immunologic studies in presumed amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 510–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(5): 445.e1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Shea, A, Eappen, S. Amniotic fluid embolism. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 45(1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG, Williams, JW. Williams Obstetrics, 21st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.Google Scholar
Czikk, MJ, McCarthy, FP, Murphy, KE. Chorioamnionitis: from pathogenesis to treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17(9): 1304–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grether, JK, Nelson, KB. Maternal infection and cerebral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. JAMA 1997; 278: 207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, YW, Escobar, GJ, Grether, JK, et al. Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy in term and near-term infants. JAMA 2003; 290(20): 2677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasef, N, Shabaan, AE, Schurr, P, et al. Effect of clinical and histological chorioamnionitis on the outcome of preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(1): 59–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Malloy, MH. Chorioamnionitis: epidemiology of newborn management and outcome United States 2008. J Perinatol 2014; 34(8): 611–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishman, SG, Gelber, SE. Evidence for the clinical management of chorioamnionitis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17(1): 46–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, E, Reveiz, L, Illanes, E, et al. Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 19(12): CD010976.Google Scholar
Lyell, DJ, Pullen, K, Fuh, K, et al. Daily compared with 8-hour gentamicin for the treatment of intrapartum chorioamnionitis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115(2 Pt 1): 344–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies (Practice Bulletin No. 146). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124(2 Pt 1): 390–6.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Yoon, BH, Chaemsaithong, P, et al. Bacteria and endotoxin in meconium-stained amniotic fluid at term: could intra-amniotic infection cause meconium passage? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 775–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beligere, N, Rao, R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: report of a study and literature review. J Perinatol 2008; 28(Suppl. 3):S93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmeyr, GJ, Xu, H, Eke, AC. Amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 1: CD000014.Google Scholar
Katz, VL, Seeds, JW. Malpresentations other than breech. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986; 29(2): 329–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, MR, Kreiser, D, Taslimi, MM, et al. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 521–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahalka, N, Sadan, O, Malinger, G, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(2): 381–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruikshank, DP, White, CA. Obstetric malpresentations: twenty years’ experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 116: 1097–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins: Obstetrics (Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version). Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127(2): e54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Mode of term single breech delivery (Committee Opinion No. 265). Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 1189–90.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Mode of term singleton breech delivery (Committee Opinion No. 340). Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 235–7.Google Scholar
Whyte, H, Hannah, ME, Saigal, S, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berhan, Y, Haileamlak, A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2016; 123(1): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughey, AB, Sharshiner, R, Cheng, YW. Fetal malposition: impact and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(2): 241–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, E, Davidson, K, Lee-Parritz, A, et al. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105(5 Pt 1): 974–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, YW, Shaffer, BL, Caughey, AB. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(4): 837–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichman, O, Gdansky, E, Latinsky, B, et al. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136(1): 25–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cluver, C, Hofmeyr, GJ, Gyte, GM, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: CD000184.Google ScholarPubMed
Hofmeyr, GJ, Kulier, R, West, HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 4: CD000083.Google Scholar
Kaymak, O, Iskender, C, Ibanoglu, M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse during labor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19(13): 2336–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Hartigan, L, Hehir, M, McHugh, A, et al. Analysis of incidence and outcomes of umbilical cord prolapse over 20 years at a large tertiary referral center (abstract no. 431). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(Suppl. 1): S188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, C, O’Herlihy, C, Murphy, JF. Umbilical cord prolapsed – changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121(13): 1705–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor (Practice Bulletin No. 49). Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1445–54.Google Scholar
Friedman, EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analyis. Obstet Gynecol 1955; 6(6): 567–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, SJ, Laros, RK. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 85–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheng, YW, Shaffer, BL, Nicholson, JM, et al. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(3): 527–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myles, TD, Santolaya, J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 52–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Rouse, DJ, Weiner, SJ, Bloom, SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(4): 357.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, JF, Daniels, KI, Brodzinsky, L, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 306.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benfield, N, Young-Lin, N, Kimona, C, et al. Fistula after attended delivery and the challenge of obstetric care capacity in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 130(2): 157–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, HY, Chauhan, SP, Ananth, CV, et al. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204(6): 491.e1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings (Practice Bulletin No. 116). Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(5): 1232–40.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 5: CD006066.Google Scholar
Nielsen, PV, Stigsby, B, Nickelsen, C, et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hruban, L, Spilka, J, Chudáček, V, et al. Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21(4): 694–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, SP, Klauser, CK, Woodring, TC, et al. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(6): 623.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macones, GA, Hankins, GD, Spong, CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop Report on Electronic Fetal Monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008; 37(5): 510–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L, Tuuli, MG, Roehl, KA, et al. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns associated with respiratory morbidity in term neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(5): 681.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Caughey, AB, Roehl, KA, et al. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 1070–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KB, Dambrosia, JM, Ting, TY, et al. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 613–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amer-Wahlin, I, Kwee, A. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 30: 48–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Hankins, GD. Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy: fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 628–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, EM, Adami, RR, McKenney, SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal heart rate monitoring in the identification of neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124(3): 507–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, EM, Ruis, KA, Hartman, AL, et al. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(6): 587–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Stoknes, M, Andersen, GL, Dahlseng, MO, et al. Cerebral palsy and neonatal death in term singletons born small for gestational age. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1629–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garfinkle, J, Wintermark, P, Shevell, MI, et al. Cerebral palsy after neonatal encephalopathy: how much is preventable? J Pediatr 2015; 167: 58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Wibbens, B, Bennet, L, et al. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiological approach to interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: e1–e11.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, KB, Dambrosia, JM, Ting, TY, Grether, JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 613–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Lindsay, BG, Derrick, EJ. Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1391–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR. Antecedents of neonatal encephalopathy with fetal acidaemia at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 774–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, F, Rutherford, M, Groenendaal, F, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361: 736–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellstrom-Westas, L, Rosen, I, Svenningsen, NW. Predictive value of early continuous amplitude integrated EEG recordings on outcome after severe birth asphyxia in full term infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72: F34–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, SC, Baudin, J, Cady, E, et al. Relation of deranged neonatal cerebral oxidative metabolism with neurodevelopmental outcome and head circumference at 4 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 718–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, AD, Brocklehurst, P, Gunn, AJ, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ 2010; 340: c363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, CM, Finer, NN. Long-term follow-up of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 1993; 20: 483–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonsson, M, Agren, J, Norden-Lindeberg, S, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy and the association to asphyxia in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(667): e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, MV. Excitotoxicity in perinatal brain injury. Brain Pathol 2005; 15: 234–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassink, G, Gunn, ER, Drury, PP, et al. The mechanisms and treatment of asphyxial encephalopathy. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, W, Yue, Q, Rosenberg, PA, et al. Oligodendrocyte excitotoxicity determined by local glutamate accumulation and mitochondrial function. J Neurochem 2006; 98: 213–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niquet, J, Seo, DW, Allen, SG, Wasterlain, CG. Hypoxia in presence of blockers of excitotoxicity induces a caspase-dependent neuronal necrosis. Neuroscience 2006; 141: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boddy, K, Dawes, GS, Fisher, R, et al. Foetal respiratory movements, electrocortical and cardiovascular responses to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia in sheep. J Physiol 1974; 243: 599–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blood, AB, Hunter, CJ, Power, GG. Adenosine mediates decreased cerebral metabolic rate and increased cerebral blood flow during acute moderate hypoxia in the near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2003; 553: 935–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, CJ, Bennet, L, Power, GG, et al. Key neuroprotective role for endogenous adenosine A1 receptor activation during asphyxia in the fetal sheep. Stroke 2003; 34: 2240–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Takeda, Y, Hirakawa, M. Threshold of ischemic depolarization for neuronal injury following four-vessel occlusion in the rat cortex. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2000; 12: 247–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, DJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Fetal myocardial oxygen and carbohydrate consumption during acutely induced hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H657–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Turbow, RM, Curran-Everett, D, Hay, WW Jr, Jones, MD Jr. Cerebral lactate metabolism in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: R938–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, DL, Weston, PJ, Harding, JE. Lactate, rather than ketones, may provide alternative cerebral fuel in hypoglycaemic newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: F161–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L. Fetal hypoxia insults and patterns of brain injury: insights from animal models. Clin Perinatol 2009; 36: 579–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, GH, Baghurst, KI, Potter, BJ, Hetzel, BS. Foetal brain development in the sheep. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1979; 5: 103–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Longo, LD, Koos, BJ, Power, GG. Fetal myoglobin: quantitative determination and importance for oxygenation. Am J Physiol 1973; 224: 1032–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guiang, SF 3rd, Widness, JA, Flanagan, KB, et al. The relationship between fetal arterial oxygen saturation and heart and skeletal muscle myoglobin concentrations in the ovine fetus. J Dev Physiol 1993; 19: 99–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Reuss, ML, Rudolph, AM, Heymann, MA. Selective distribution of microspheres injected into the umbilical veins and inferior venae cavae of fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 427–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkening, RB, Meschia, G. Fetal oxygen uptake, oxygenation, and acid-base balance as a function of uterine blood flow. Am J Physiol 1983; 244: H749–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, Spencer, JA, Moore, PJ, et al. Afferent and efferent components of the cardiovascular reflex responses to acute hypoxia in term fetal sheep. J Physiol 1993; 461: 431–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, LL, Sheldon, RE, Jones, MD Jr, et al. Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 637–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, LR, Bennet, L, Hanson, MA. The role of nitric oxide synthesis in cardiovascular responses to acute hypoxia in the late gestation sheep fetus. J Physiol 1996; 497: 271–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, Spencer, JAD, Hanson, MA. Fetal and cardiovascular reflex responses to hypoxaemia. Fetal Maternal Med Rev 1994; 6: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A, Garnier, Y, Berger, R. Dynamics of fetal circulatory responses to hypoxia and asphyxia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 84: 155–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, HE, Sacks, EJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia and acidemia in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 120: 817–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, AJ, Gardner, DS, Edwards, CM, et al. Development of the ovine fetal cardiovascular defense to hypoxemia towards full term. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H3023–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itskovitz, J, Rudolph, AM. Denervation of arterial chemoreceptors and baroreceptors in fetal lambs in utero. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H916–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, McGarrigle, HH, Spencer, JA, et al. Effect of carotid denervation on plasma vasopressin levels during acute hypoxia in the late-gestation sheep fetus. J Physiol 1994; 477: 81–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartelds, B, van Bel, F, Teitel, DF, Rudolph, AM. Carotid, not aortic, chemoreceptors mediate the fetal cardiovascular response to acute hypoxemia in lambs. Pediatr Res 1993; 34: 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A, Hanson, MA. Circulatory responses to acute asphyxia in intact and chemodenervated fetal sheep near term. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995; 7: 1351–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barcroft, J. Researches in Prenatal Life. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1946.Google Scholar
Caldeyro-Barcia, R, Medez-Bauer, C, Poseiro, J, et al. Control of the human fetal heart rate during labour. In Cassels, D, ed., The Heart and Circulation in the Newborn and Infant. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1966: 7–36.Google Scholar
Hanson, MA. Do we now understand the control of the fetal circulation? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 75: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawes, GS. The central control of fetal breathing and skeletal muscle movements. J Physiol 1984; 346: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Johnston, BM. Lesions in the upper lateral pons abolish the hypoxic depression of breathing in unanaesthetized fetal lambs in utero. J Physiol 1987; 382: 373–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koos, BJ, Chau, A, Matsuura, M, et al. Thalamic locus mediates hypoxic inhibition of breathing in fetal sheep. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 2383–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natale, R, Clewlow, F, Dawes, GS. Measurement of fetal forelimb movements in the lamb in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 545–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, BS. The effect of behavioral state on fetal metabolism and blood flow circulation. Semin Perinatol 1992; 16: 227–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Iwamoto, HS, Rudolph, AM, Mirkin, BL, Keil, LC. Circulatory and humoral responses of sympathectomized fetal sheep to hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: H767–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Reuss, ML, Parer, JT, Harris, JL, Krueger, TR. Hemodynamic effects of alpha-adrenergic blockade during hypoxia in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 410–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, Riquelme, RA, Sanhueza, EM, et al. Adrenergic and vasopressinergic contributions to the cardiovascular response to acute hypoxemia in the llama fetus. J Physiol 1999; 515: 233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, LR, McGarrigle, HH, Bennet, L, Hanson, MA. Angiotensin II and cardiovascular chemoreflex responses to acute hypoxia in late gestation fetal sheep. J Physiol 1998; 507: 857–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, Fraser, M, et al. Adenosine A1 receptor mediated suppression of adrenal activity in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010; 298: R700–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tangalakis, K, Lumbers, ER, Moritz, KM, et al. Effect of cortisol on blood pressure and vascular reactivity in the ovine fetus. Exp Physiol 1992; 77: 709–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comline, RS, Silver, IA, Silver, M. Factors responsible for the stimulation of the adrenal medulla during asphyxia in the foetal lamb. J Physiol 1965; 178: 211–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, CY. Direct adrenal medullary catecholamine response to hypoxia in fetal sheep. J Neurochem 1989; 52: 148–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, BS, Bocking, AD. Metabolic and circulatory adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the fetus. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 1998; 119: 717–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielson, L, McMillen, IC, Dyer, JL, Morrison, JL. Restriction of placental growth results in greater hypotensive response to alpha-adrenergic blockade in fetal sheep during late gestation. J Physiol 2005; 563: 611–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitanaka, T, Alonso, JG, Gilbert, RD, et al. Fetal responses to long-term hypoxemia in sheep. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: R1348–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Gleason, CA, Hamm, C, Jones, MD Jr. Effect of acute hypoxemia on brain blood flow and oxygen metabolism in immature fetal sheep. Am J Physiol 1990; 258: H1064–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Iwamoto, HS, Kaufman, T, Keil, LC, Rudolph, AM. Responses to acute hypoxemia in fetal sheep at 0.6–0.7 gestation. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: H613–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsuda, Y, Patrick, J, Carmichael, L, et al. Effects of sustained hypoxemia on the sheep fetus at midgestation: endocrine, cardiovascular, and biophysical responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 531–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, AJ, Gardner, DS, Edwards, M, et al. Development of the ovine fetal cardiovascular defense to hypoxemia towards term. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H3023–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. The brain of the asphyxiated fetus–basic research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 65: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelley, HJ. Glycogen reserves and their changes at birth and in anoxia. Br Med Bull 1961; 17: 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, PP, Bennet, L, Booth, LC, et al. Maturation of the mitochondrial redox response to profound asphyxia in fetal sheep. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Peebles, DM, Edwards, AD, et al. The cerebral hemodynamic response to asphyxia and hypoxia in the near-term fetal sheep as measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 951–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Haan, HH, van Reempts, JL, Vles, JS, et al. Effects of asphyxia on the fetal lamb brain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1493–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT. Effects of fetal asphyxia on brain cell structure and function: limits of tolerance. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 1998; 119: 711–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A, Hohmann, M, Kunzel, W. Dynamic changes in organ blood flow and oxygen consumption during acute asphyxia in fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 543–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Booth, LC, Malpas, SC, Barrett, CJ, et al. Renal sympathetic nerve activity during asphyxia in fetal sheep. Am J Physiol, Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2012; 303: R30–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A, Hohmann, M, Kunzel, W. Redistribution of fetal circulation during repeated asphyxia in sheep: effects on skin blood flow, transcutaneous PO2, and plasma catecholamines. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 41–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, R, Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, et al. Sustained sympathetic nervous system support of arterial blood pressure during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2014; 306: R787–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez-Bauer, C, Poseiro, JJ, Arellano-Hernandez, G, et al. Effects of atropine of the heart rate of the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 85: 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itskovitz, J, LaGamma, EF, Rudolph, AM. Heart rate and blood pressure responses to umbilical cord compression in fetal lambs with special reference to the mechanism of variable deceleration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 147: 451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baan, J Jr, Boekkooi, PF, Teitel, DF, Rudolph, AM. Heart rate fall during acute hypoxemia: a measure of chemoreceptor response in fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1993; 19: 105–11.Google ScholarPubMed
de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, et al. Magnesium sulfate therapy during asphyxia in near-term fetal lambs does not compromise the fetus but does not reduce cerebral injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, L, Westgate, JA, Lui, YC, et al. Fetal acidosis and hypotension during repeated umbilical cord occlusions are associated with enhanced chemoreflex responses in near-term fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1477–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Booth, LC, et al. The ontogeny of hemodynamic responses to prolonged umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103: 1311–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giussani, DA, Unno, N, Jenkins, SL, et al. Dynamics of cardiovascular responses to repeated partial umbilical cord compression in late-gestation sheep fetus. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: H2351–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Gunn, AJ, Maxwell, L, de Haan, HH, et al. Delayed hypotension and subendocardial injury after repeated umbilical cord occlusion in near-term fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1564–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, S, Zecca, E, De Rosa, G, et al. Is serum troponin T a useful marker of myocardial damage in newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia? Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 181–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT. The effect of acute maternal hypoxia on fetal oxygenation and the umbilical circulation in the sheep. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1980; 10: 125–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, J, Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Gunn, AJ. Spontaneous hypoxia in multiple pregnancy is associated with early fetal decompensation and greater T wave elevation during brief repeated cord occlusion in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1526–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Gluckman, PD. Fetal heart rate changes do not reflect cardiovascular deterioration during brief repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janbu, T, Nesheim, BI. Uterine artery blood velocities during contractions in pregnancy and labour related to intrauterine pressure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 1150–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Gudmundsson, S, Olofsson, P. Acute increase of umbilical artery vascular flow resistance in compromised fetuses provoked by uterine contractions. Early Hum Dev 2003; 74: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiberg, N, Kallen, K, Olofsson, P. Physiological development of a mixed metabolic and respiratory umbilical cord blood acidemia with advancing gestational age. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 583–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modanlou, H, Yeh, SY, Hon, EH. Fetal and neonatal acid-base balance in normal and high-risk pregnancies: during labor and the first hour of life. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 43: 347–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Peebles, DM, Spencer, JA, Edwards, AD, et al. Relation between frequency of uterine contractions and human fetal cerebral oxygen saturation studied during labour by near infrared spectroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 44–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, M, Lunenfeld, E, Meizner, I, et al. The effect of the duration of the second stage of labour on the acid-base state of the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 425–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huch, A, Huch, R, Schneider, H, Rooth, G. Continuous transcutaneous monitoring of fetal oxygen tension during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkler, M, Rath, W. A risk-benefit assessment of oxytocics in obstetric practice. Drug Saf 1999; 20: 323–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, Gluckman, PD. Brief repeated umbilical cord occlusions cause sustained cytotoxic cerebral edema and focal infarcts in near-term fetal lambs. Pediatr Res 1997; 41: 96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ. Fetal heart rate overshoot during repeated umbilical cord occlusion in sheep. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 454–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, Brabyn, C, et al. ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 743–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hokegard, KH, Eriksson, BO, Kjellmer, I, et al. Myocardial metabolism in relation to electrocardiographic changes and cardiac function during graded hypoxia in the fetal lamb. Acta Physiol Scand 1981; 113: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lear, CA, Galinsky, R, Wassink, G, et al. Sympathetic neural activation does not mediate heart rate variability during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2016; 594:1265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keunen, H, Blanco, CE, van Reempts, JL, Hasaart, TH. Absence of neuronal damage after umbilical cord occlusion of 10, 15, and 20 minutes in midgestation fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 515–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, S, Gunn, AJ, Westgate, JA, et al. Fetal heart rate variability and brainstem injury after asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 287: R925–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Rossenrode, S, Gunning, MI, et al. The cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses of the immature fetal sheep to acute umbilical cord occlusion. J Physiol 1999; 517: 247–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Quaedackers, JS, Gunn, AJ, et al. The effect of asphyxia on superior mesenteric artery blood flow in the premature sheep fetus. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quaedackers, JS, Roelfsema, V, Hunter, CJ, et al. Polyuria and impaired renal blood flow after asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 286: R576–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallard, EC, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, et al. Transient umbilical cord occlusion causes hippocampal damage in the fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1423–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, RE. Experimental models of perinatal brain damage: relevance to human pathology. In Intrauterine Asphyxia and the Developing Fetal Brain. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1977: 37–97.Google Scholar
Barkovich, AJ, Sargent, SK. Profound asphyxia in the premature infant: imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 1837–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Quaedackers, JS, Roelfsema, V, Heineman, E, et al. The role of the sympathetic nervous system in post-asphyxial intestinal hypoperfusion in the preterm sheep fetus. J Physiol 2004; 557: 1033–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, Hunter, CJ, et al. Post-hypoxic hypoperfusion is associated with suppression of cerebral metabolism and increased tissue oxygenation in near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2006; 572: 131–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Booth, LC, Drury, PP, et al. Preterm neonatal cardiovascular instability: does understanding the fetus help evaluate the newborn? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 39: 965–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Booth, L, Malpas, SC, et al. Acute systemic complications in the preterm fetus after asphyxia: the role of cardiovascular and blood flow responses. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2006; 33: 291–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Campbell, S, et al. Fetal oxygenation at cordocentesis, maternal smoking and childhood neuro-development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59: 21–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, EM, Nelson, KB. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(520): e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, BS, Llanos, AJ, Creasy, RK. Responses of the growth-retarded fetus to acute hypoxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 878–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DS, Fletcher, AJ, Bloomfield, MR, et al. Effects of prevailing hypoxaemia, acidaemia or hypoglycaemia upon the cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic responses to acute hypoxaemia in the ovine fetus. J Physiol 2002; 540: 351–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Davidson, JO, et al. Pre-existing hypoxia is associated with greater EEG suppression and early onset of evolving seizure activity during brief repeated asphyxia in near-term fetal sheep. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassink, G, Galinsky, R, Drury, PP, et al. Does maturity affect cephalic perfusion and T/QRS ratio during prolonged umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep? Obstet Gynecol Int 2014; 2014: 314159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillen, IC, Robinson, JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 571–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, P, Steyn, C, McGarrigle, HH, et al. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in early gestation on responses of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to acute isocapnic hypoxaemia in late gestation fetal sheep. Exp Physiol 2000; 85: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Davidson, JO, Koome, M, Gunn, AJ. Glucocorticoids and preterm hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: the good and the bad. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 751694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koome, ME, Davidson, JO, Drury, PP, et al. Antenatal dexamethasone after asphyxia increases neural injury in preterm fetal sheep. PLoS One 2013; 8: e77480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lear, CA, Koome, MM, Davidson, JO, et al. The effects of dexamethasone on post-asphyxial cerebral oxygenation in the preterm fetal sheep. J Physiol 2014; 592: 5493–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heald, A, Abdel-Latif, ME, Kent, AL. Insulin infusion for hyperglycaemia in very preterm infants appears safe with no effect on morbidity, mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 2415–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeBlanc, MH, Huang, M, Vig, V, et al. Glucose affects the severity of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in newborn pigs. Stroke 1993; 24: 1055–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Renzo, GC, Rosati, A, Sarti, RD, et al. Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med 2007; 4: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurn, PD, Vannucci, SJ, Hagberg, H. Adult or perinatal brain injury: does sex matter? Stroke 2005; 36: 193–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijboer, CH, Groenendaal, F, Kavelaars, A, et al. Gender-specific neuroprotection by 2-iminobiotin after hypoxia-ischemia in the neonatal rat via a nitric oxide independent pathway. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, MM. Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 91–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussein, MH, Daoud, GA, Kakita, H, et al. The sex differences of cerebrospinal fluid levels of interleukin 8 and antioxidants in asphyxiated newborns. Shock 2007; 28: 154–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawes, NW, Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CWG. Fetal heart rate patterns in term labor vary with sex, gestational age, epidural analgesia, and fetal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 181–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorngren-Jerneck, K, Herbst, A. Low 5-Minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 65–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Mittwoch, U. The elusive action of sex-determining genes: mitochondria to the rescue? J Theor Biol 2004; 228: 359–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenough, A, Lagercrantz, H, Pool, J, Dahlin, I. Plasma catecholamine levels in preterm infants: effect of birth asphyxia and Apgar score. Acta Paediatr Scand 1987; 76: 54–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, L, Booth, LC, Ahmed-Nasef, N, et al. Male disadvantage? Fetal sex and cardiovascular responses to asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R1280–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, KS, Wilkins, R, Dodds, L, et al. Customized birth weight for gestational age standards: perinatal mortality patterns are consistent with separate standards for males and females but not for blacks and whites. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2005; 5: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simchen, MJ, Weisz, B, Zilberberg, E, et al. Male disadvantage for neonatal complications of term infants, especially in small-for-gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neona 2014; 27: 839–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansson, T, Lambert, GW. Effect of intrauterine growth restriction on blood pressure, glucose tolerance and sympathetic nervous system activity in the rat at 3–4 months of age. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1239–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nomura, RM, Ortigosa, C, Fiorelli, LR, et al. Gender-specific differences in fetal cardiac troponin T in pregnancies complicated by placental insufficiency. Gender Med 2011; 8: 202–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR, de Haan, HH, et al. Dramatic neuronal rescue with prolonged selective head cooling after ischemia in fetal lambs. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 248–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, AJ, Parer, JT, Mallard, EC, et al. Cerebral histologic and electrocorticographic changes after asphyxia in fetal sheep. Pediatr Res 1992; 31: 486–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torvik, A. The pathogenesis of watershed infarcts in the brain. Stroke 1984; 15: 221–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, T, Murata, Y, Quilligan, EJ, et al. Physiologic and histologic changes in near-term fetal lambs exposed to asphyxia by partial umbilical cord occlusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, S, Mallard, C, Breen, S, et al. Fetal brain injury following prolonged hypoxemia and placental insufficiency: a review. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol IntegrPhysiol 1998; 119: 653–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Mallard, EC, Williams, CE, Johnston, BM, et al. Repeated episodes of umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep lead to preferential damage to the striatum and sensitize the heart to further insults. Pediatr Res 1995; 37: 707–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, SP, Ramaswamy, V, Michelson, D, et al. Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, CJ, Gluckman, PD, Williams, C, Bennet, L. Precocial neural function in the growth-retarded fetal lamb. Pediatr Res 1988; 24: 600–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, OH, Fleming, PJ, Morgan, MH. Abnormal development of visual function following intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Olivier, M, McLean, FH, et al. Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 707–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR. The “pharmacology” of neuronal rescue with cerebral hypothermia. Early Hum Dev 1998; 53: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L. Is temperature important in delivery room resuscitation? Semin Neonatol 2001; 6: 241–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, E, Eichenwald, E, Mathur, G, et al. Intrapartum fever and unexplained seizures in term infants. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 983–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, J, Asselin, J. Increased neural damage to global hemispheric hypoxic ischemia (GHHI) in febrile but not nonfebrile lipopolysaccharide Escherichia coli injected rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1998; 76: 1008–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, JA. Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: definition, diagnosis, and classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 957–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L, et al. Do fetal electrocardiogram PR-RR changes reflect progressive asphyxia after repeated umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep? Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, Gunn, AJ. Fetal heart rate variability changes during brief repeated umbilical cord occlusion in near term fetal sheep. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 664–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallard, EC, Williams, CE, Gunn, AJ, et al. Frequent episodes of brief ischemia sensitize the fetal sheep brain to neuronal loss and induce striatal injury. Pediatr Res 1993; 33: 61–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

MacDorman, MF, Gregory, ECW. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports 2015; 64(8).Google Scholar
Gregory, ECW, MacDorman, MF, Martin, JA. Trends in fetal and perinatal mortality in the United States, 2006–2012 (NCHS data brief, no 169), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 2014.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal and Infant Mortality Statistics: Committee Opinion 167. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1995.Google Scholar
Osterman, MJ, Kochanek, KD, MacDorman, MF, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2012–2013. Pediatrics 2015; 135(6): 1115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in infant mortality attributable to birth defects: United States, 1980–1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998; 47: 773–8.Google Scholar
Mathews, TJ, MacDorman, MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2007 period linked birth/infant death data set. National Vital Statistics Reports 2011; 59(6).Google ScholarPubMed
Fretts, RC, Boyd, ME, Usher, RH, et al. The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961–1988. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 35–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Fretts, RC, Schmittdiel, J, McLean, FH, et al. Increased maternal age and the risk of fetal death. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 953–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeye, RL. Causes of perinatal mortality in the United States Collaborative Perinatal Project. JAMA 1977; 238: 228–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammer, EJ, Brown, LE, Anderka, MR, et al. Classification and analysis of fetal deaths in Massachussetts. JAMA 1989; 261: 1757–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011; 306: 2459–68.Google Scholar
Grant, A, Elbourne, D. Fetal movement counting to assess fetal well-being. In Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, eds., Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford University Press, 1989:440.Google Scholar
Cotzias, CS, Paterson-Brown, S, Fisk, NM. Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis. BMJ 1999; 319: 282–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, FA. Assessment of fetal condition and risk: analysis of single and combined biophysical variable monitoring. Semin Perinatol 1985; 9: 168–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Woerden, EE, VanGeijn, HP. Heart-rate patterns and fetal movements. In Nijhuis, J, ed., Fetal Behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992:41.Google Scholar
Antepartum fetal surveillance. ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 188: January 1994. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 44: 289–94.Google Scholar
Huddleston, JF, Sutliff, G, Robinson, D. Contraction stress test by intermittent nipple stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 669–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Braly, P, Freeman, R, Garite, T, et al. Incidence of premature delivery following the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141:5–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum fetal surveillance (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 145; replaces ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 9, October 1999). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 182–92Google Scholar
Nageotte, MP, Towers, CV, Asrat, T, et al. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 231–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Freeman, R, Anderson, G, Dorchester, W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 771–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, R, Garite, T, Mondanlou, H, et al. Postdate pregnancy: utilization of contraction stress testing for primary fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 128–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druzin, ML, Karver, ML, Wagner, W, et al. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress test and non-stress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 507–12.Google Scholar
Merrill, PM, Porto, M, Lovett, SM, et al. Evaluation of the non-reactive positive contraction stress test prior to 32 weeks: the role of the biophysical profile. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12: 229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammacher, K. The clinical significance of cardiotocography. In Huntingford, P, Huter, K, Saling, E, eds., Perinatal Medicine: 1st European Congress, Berlin. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1969:80.Google Scholar
Parer, JT. Fetal heart rate. In Creasy, RK, Resnick, R, eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994.Google Scholar
Lemons, JA, Bauer, CR, Oh, W. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graca, LM, Cardoso, CG, Clode, N, et al. Acute effects of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal heart rate and fetal body movements felt by the mother. J Perinat Med 1991; 19: 385–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavery, J. Nonstress fetal heart rate testing. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 689–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schifrin, B, Foye, G, Amato, J, et al. Routine fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 21–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, DA, Rabello, YA, Paul, RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 812–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druzin, ML, Fox, A, Kogut, E, et al. The relationship of the nonstress test to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 386–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dashow, EE, Read, JA. Significant fetal bradycardia during antepartum heart rate testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 187–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druzin, ML. Fetal bradycardia during antepartum testing. J Reprod Med 1989; 34:1.Google ScholarPubMed
Phelan, JP. The nonstress test: a review of 3000 tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, VA, Sawers, RS, Parsons, RJ, et al. The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high risk pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 716–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, A, Kelly, J, Mansfield, H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of non-stress antepartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 427–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, L, Patel, N, Smith, R. Non-stress antenatal cardiotocography: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1156–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Lumley, J, Lester, A, Anderson, I, et al. A randomised trial of weekly cardiotocography in high risk obstetric patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 90: 1018–26.Google Scholar
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12: CD007863.Google ScholarPubMed
Thornton, JG, Lilford, RJ. Do we need randomised trials of antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, EP, Hutson, JM, Petrie, RH. An assessment of the first decade’s experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Perinatol 1988; 5: 134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, CV, Phelan, JP, Nguyen, HN, et al. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 365–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarno, AP, Bruner, JP. Fetal acoustic stimulation as a possible adjunct to diagnostic ultrasound: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 668–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Tan, KH, Smyth, RD, Wei, X. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12:CD002963.Google Scholar
Serafini, P, Lindsay, MBJ, Nagey, DA, et al. Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation, the acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 41–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Divon, MY, Platt, LD, Cantrell, CJ. Evoked fetal startle response: a possible intrauterine neurological examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 454–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohel, G, Simon, A, Linder, N, et al. Anencephaly and the nature of fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Am J Perinatol 1986; 3: 345–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birnholz, JC, Benacerraf, BR. The development of fetal hearing. Science 1983; 148: 41–5.Google Scholar
Crade, M, Lovett, S. Fetal response to sound stimulation: preliminary report exploring use of sound stimulation in routine obstetrical ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druzin, ML, Edersheim, TG, Hutson, JM. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on the nonstress test at gestational ages of thirty-two weeks or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1476–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietrantoni, M, Angel, JL, Parsons, MT, et al. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 807–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Patrick, J, Campbell, K, Carmichael, L, et al. Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 363–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, JF, Weaver, JB. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. Br Med J 1976; 1: 1305–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laventhal, NT, Dildy, GA, Belfort, MA. Fetal tachyarrhythmia associated with vibroacoustic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 1116–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Tan, KH, Sabapathy, A, Wei, X: Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4: CD003396.Google Scholar
Piyamongkol, W, Trungtawatchai, S, Chanprapaph, P, et al. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89: 1999–2002.Google ScholarPubMed
Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar
Neldam, S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well being. Dan Med Bull 1983; 30: 274–8.Google Scholar
Moore, TR, Piacquadio, K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1075–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbourne, D, Grant, A. Study results vary in count-to-10 method of fetal movement screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 264–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A, Valentin, L, Elbourne, D. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989; 2: 345–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Sorokin, Y, Kierker, L. Fetal movement. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 719–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, TR, Jordan, ET, Paine, LL. Doppler recordings of fetal movement. II. Comparison with maternal perception. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 42–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Rayburn, W, Barr, M. Activity patterns in malformed fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 1045–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelan, JP, Kester, R, Labudovich, ML. Nonstress test and maternal glucose determinations. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 437–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Druzin, ML, Foodim, J. Effect of maternal glucose ingestion compared with maternal water ingestion on the nonstress test. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 67: 425–6.Google Scholar
Holden, K, Jovanovic, L, Druzin, M, et al. Increased fetal activity with low maternal blood glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Am J Perinatol 1984; 1: 161–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, RM, Luby, AM, Scanlon, JW, et al. Effect of surfactant on morbidity, mortality and resource use in newborn infants weighing 500–1,500 grams. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1476–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, J, Field, S, Thomas, H. Women’s views on keeping fetal movement charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 334–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Mikhail, MS, Freda, MC, Merkatz, RB, et al. The effect of fetal movement counting on maternal attachment to fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 988–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rurak, DW, Gruber, NC. Effect of neuromuscular blockade on oxygen consumption and blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA: Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 16:CD006593Google Scholar
Inglis, SR, Druzin, ML, Wagner, WE, et al. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 371–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Vintzileos, AM, Gaffrey, SE, Salinger, IM, et al. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile score and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labour. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 196–201.Google Scholar
Manning, F. Fetal assessment by evaluation of biophysical variables: fetal biophysical profile score. In Creasy, R, Resnik, R, eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1999.Google Scholar
Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 557–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Lange, IR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 709–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, MK, Schneider, EP, Petrikovsky, BM, et al. Effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal biophysical profile. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 224–6.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deren, O, Karaer, C, Onderoglu, L, et al. The effect of steroids on the biophysical profile and Doppler indices of umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in healthy preterm fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 1: CD000038Google Scholar
Nageotte, MP, Towers, CV, Asrat, T, et al. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1672–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCowan, LME, Harding, JE, Stewart, AW, et al. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in small for gestational age babies reflect disease severity. BJOG 2000; 107: 916–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, RN, Divon, MY. Intrauterine growth retardation: diagnosis. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 171.Google Scholar
Itskovitz, J. Maternal-fetal hemodynamics. In Maulik, D, McNellis, D, eds., Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine (VIII): Doppler Ultrasound Measurement of Maternal-Fetal Hemodynamics. Ithaca, NY: Perinatology Press, 1987: 13.Google Scholar
Morrow, R, Ritchie, K. Doppler ultrasound fetal velocimetry and its role in obstetrics. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16: 771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copel, JA, Schlafer, D, Wentworth, R, et al. Does the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio reflect flow or acidosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farine, D, Kelly, EN, Ryan, G, et al. Absent and reversed umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 187.Google Scholar
Divon, MY, Ferber, A. Evidence-based antepartum fetal testing. Prenat Neonatal Med 2000; 5: 3–8.Google Scholar
Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 750–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 11: CD007529Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM: Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 8: CD001450Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. First trimester fetal and uterine Doppler. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 105.Google Scholar
Signore, C, Freeman, RK, Spong, CY: Antenatal testing: a reevaluation. Executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scifres, CM, Macones, GA: Antenatal testing: benefits and costs. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kontopoulos, EV, Vintzileos, AM: Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Hon, EH. The electronic evaluation of the fetal heart rate: preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 75(6): 1215–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hon, EH, Hess, OW. Instrumentation of fetal electrocardiography. Science 1957; 125(3247): 553–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, RC, et al. Fetal heart rate as a predictor of fetal distress: a report from the collaborative project. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32(2): 259–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Lilien, AA. Term intrapartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107(4): 595–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jepson, JH. Factors influencing oxygenation in mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 44(6): 906–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Quilligan, EJ, Paul, RH. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it? Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45(1): 6–100Google ScholarPubMed
Yeh, SY, DIaz, F, Paul, RH. Ten-year experience of intrapartum fetal monitoring in Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143(5): 496–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, D, et al. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152(5): 524–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT. Roundtable: Part I. The Dublin trial of fetal heart rate monitoring: the final word? Birth 1986; 13(2): 119–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A, et al. Cerebral palsy among children born during the Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum monitoring. Lancet 1989; 8674(2): 1233–6.Google Scholar
Banta, HD, Thacker, SB. Electronic fetal monitoring. Lessons from a formative case of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18(4): 762–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control. Rates of cesarean delivery–United States, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993; 42(15): 285–9.Google Scholar
Chez, BF, Baird, SM. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2011; 25(2): 180–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD006066.Google Scholar
Maso, G, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal. Minerva Ginecol 2015; 67(1): 65–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Redman, C. 45 years of fetal heart rate monitoring in BJOG. BJOG 2015; 122(4): 536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labours, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum, on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1966; 46: 7–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Hon, EH. Apparatus for continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate. Yale J Biol Med 1960; 32(5): 397–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Haverkamp, AD, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125(3): 310–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT. Fetal heart-rate monitoring. Lancet 1979; 2(8143): 632–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Thacker, SB, Stroup, DF, Peterson, HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86(4 Pt 1): 613–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larma, JD, et al. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(3): 301.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KB, et al. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(10): 613–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spong, CY. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: another look. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(3): 506–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grivell, RM, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 9: CD007863.Google Scholar
Finnemore, A, Groves, A. Physiology of the fetal and transitional circulation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 20(4): 210–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornburg, KL, Louey, S. Uteroplacental circulation and fetal vascular function and development. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2013; 11(5): 748–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L. Uteroplacental circulation and maternal/fetal health. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2013; 11(5): 543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, BS. Fetal adaptive responses to asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16(3): 595–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadovsky, G, Nicolaides, KH. Reference ranges for fetal heart rate patterns in normoxaemic nonanaemic fetuses. Fetal Ther 1989; 4(2–3): 61–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, CB, Gingerich, B. Uteroplacental physiology. JOGN Nurs 1976; 5(5 Suppl.):16s–25s.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PA, et al. In utero right ventricular output in the fetal lamb: the effect of heart rate. J Physiol 1987; 387: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PA, et al. The effect of heart rate on in utero left ventricular output in the fetal sheep. J Physiol 1986; 372: 557–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177(6): 1385–90.Google Scholar
Parer, JT, Ikeda, T, King, TL. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on fetal heart rate monitoring. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(1): 136–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106). Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(1): 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soncini, E, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27(14): 1465–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT, Ikeda, T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(1): 26.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, YS, et al. Difference of fetal heart rate accelerations based on 10 and 15 beats per minute. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36(2): 291–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salamalekis, E, et al. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19(3): 165–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, MG, et al. Correlation of arterial fetal base deficit and lactate changes with severity of variable heart rate decelerations in the near-term ovine fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(4): 285.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, RH, et al. Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 123(2): 206–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Parer, JT, et al. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19(5): 289–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozden, S, Demirci, F. Significance for fetal outcome of poor prognostic features in fetal heart rate traces with variable decelerations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262(3–4): 141–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Pillai, M, James, D. The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(5 Pt 1): 812–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honjo, S, Yamaguchi, M. Umbilical artery blood acid-base analysis and fetal heart rate baseline in the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001; 27(5): 249–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, A, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Antepartum high-frequency fetal heart rate sinusoidal rhythm: computerized detection and fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(4): 407.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egley, C. The clinical significance of intermittent sinusoidal fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181(4): 1041–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frasch, MG, et al. Correlating multidimensional fetal heart rate variability analysis with acid-base balance at birth. Physiol Meas 2014; 35(12): L1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uccella, S, et al. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians? J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35(3): 241–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, J, De Vries, R, Low, LK. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2014; 28(2): 135–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Yudkin, PL, et al. Assessing the contribution of birth asphyxia to cerebral palsy in term singletons. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1995; 9(2): 156–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KB, Blair, E. Prenatal factors in singletons with cerebral palsy born at or near term. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(10): 946–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macones, GA, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 661–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skupski, DW, Eglington, GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(4): 830.Google ScholarPubMed
Lazebnik, N, et al. Response of fetal heart rate to scalp stimulation related to fetal acid-base status. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9(4): 228–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
East, CE, et al. Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD004664.Google Scholar
Westgren, M, et al. Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling: a prospective randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105(1): 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, CE, et al. Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 5: CD006174.Google Scholar
Garite, TJ, et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183(5): 1049–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yam, J, Chua, S, Arulkumaran, S. Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. I. Principles and technical issues. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55(3): 163–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloom, SL, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(21): 2195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amer-Wahlin, I, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358(9281): 534–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potti, S, Berghella, V. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(8): 657–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Salmelin, A, et al. Fetal monitoring with computerized ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92(1): 28–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, J, Moster, D, Albrechtsen, S. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93(2): 175–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olofsson, P, et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. I. the randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93(6): 556–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Westerhuis, ME, et al. Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(7): 830–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belfort, MA, et al. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(7): 632–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neilson, JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD000116.Google Scholar
Sletten, J, Kessler, J. QRS abnormalities of the fetal electrocardiogram, and their implications for ST-interval analysis during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94(10): 1128–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stampalija, T, et al. Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(8): 1517–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Signorini, MG, Fanelli, A, Magenes, G. Monitoring fetal heart rate during pregnancy: contributions from advanced signal processing and wearable technology. Comput Math Methods Med, 2014; 2014: 707581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adam, J. The future of fetal monitoring. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2012; 5: 132e–136e.Google Scholar
Hamilton, EF, Warrick, PA. New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance. J Perinat Med 2013; 41(1): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakladar, A, Adams, H. Dangers of listening to the fetal heart at home. BMJ 2009; 339: b4308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×