Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:20:54.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Inter-relationships between consanguinity, religion and fertility in Karnataka, South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2010

John Landers
Affiliation:
University College London
Vernon Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When considering factors which act as major influences on fertility, religion and consanguinity may feature prominently, especially among the populations of less developed nations. Unfortunately, in many such studies it has been the practice either to assess the effects of religion and consanguinity separately, or to ignore consanguinity altogether. For the investigation of possible inter-relationships between the three parameters South India provides an excellent study centre. In the four southern states, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu, with a combined population in the 1981 Census of India of 164.1 millions, consanguineous marriages are strongly favoured and three major religions, Hinduism, Islam and Christianity, are practised. Therefore detailed studies into the relative roles and effects of religion and consanguinity on fertility are possible at local, state and regional levels.

The study population

Data have been collected on fertility and a variety of fertility-associated parameters in the cities of Bangalore and Mysore, the present and former capital of the state of Karnataka, as part of a prospective neonatal screening programme for the detection of inherited amino acid disorders (Appaji Rao et al, 1988). Within three to five days of the birth of a child, details are obtained by interview from the mother on her age, the degree of genetic relatedness between husband and wife, their religion(s), and the number of liveborn and living children in the family. The consanguinity classes noted are: nonconsanguineous (with a coefficient of inbreeding in the offspring F=O), beyond second cousin (F < 0.0156), second cousin (F= 0.0156), first cousin (F= 0.0625) and uncle–niece (F=0.125).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×