Pleasure, Utility, and Choice

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806582.017

17 - Pleasure, Utility, and Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Barbara A. Mellers

Edited by

Antony S. R. Manstead ,

Nico Frijda and

Agneta Fischer

Show author details

Barbara A. Mellers: Affiliation:
University of California
Antony S. R. Manstead: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Nico Frijda: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Agneta Fischer: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

When making choices, people usually imagine how they will feel about the consequences. This chapter provides an account of the anticipation process and uses it to predict choice. Decisions from several experiments are consistent with a theory in which people are assumed to evaluate alternatives by making trade-offs between predicted pleasure and pain. Then they choose the alternative with greater expected pleasure.

The field of decision making has long benefited from the interdisciplinary contributions of philosophers, economists, statisticians, and many others. These interdisciplinary contibutions can be categorized into two camps. One camp specifies how people should make choices if they wish to obey fundamental rules of logic and probability. The other camp focuses on what people actually do when making choices. While rational theories rely on beliefs and utilities, descriptive theories look to psychological processes including cognitive limitations, social norms, and cultural constraints to explain actual choices and the reasons behind alleged deviations from rationality.

Both camps are well aware that emotions influence choice. Rational theorists have addressed the question of whether emotions should influence choice, and descriptive theorists have explored how emotions influence choice. This chapter presents a descriptive account of decision making that focuses on anticipated pleasure. We propose that, when making a choice, people imagine how they will feel about future consequences. Comparisons of qualitatively different feelings are made in terms of pleasure and pain. That is, people evaluate each alternative by balancing imagined pleasure against imagined pain and select the alternative with greater average pleasure.

Type: Chapter
Information: Feelings and Emotions
The Amsterdam Symposium
, pp. 282 - 300

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806582.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Bless, H.; Bohner, G.; Schwarz, N.; & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331–335CrossRef Google Scholar

Breiter, H. C.; Aharon, I.; Kahneman, D.; Dale, A.; & Shizgal, P.Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639CrossRef

Clore, G. L., & Parrott, W. G. (1991). Moods and their vicissitudes: Thoughts and feelings as information. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 107–123). Oxford: Pergamon Press

Clore, G. L.; Schwarz, N.; & Conway, M. (1994). Emotion and information processing. In R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2d ed., pp. 323–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam

Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: New York Philosophical Library

Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preferences for a non-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. (1988). Emotional mood, cognitive style, and behavioral regulation. In K. Fiedler and J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 100–119). Toronto: Hoegrefe International

Forgas, J. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multi-process model. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 53–60). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason. New York: Norton

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gilbert, D. T.; Pinel, E. C.; Wilson, T. C.; Blumberg, S. J.; & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59, 667–686CrossRef Google Scholar

Harrison, J. R., & March, J. G. (1984). Decision making and postdecision surprises. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 26–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Inman, J. J.; Dyer, J. S.; & Jia, J. (1997). A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation. Marketing Science, 6, 97–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). New York: Guilford Press

Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2, 18–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press

Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263–292CrossRef Google Scholar

Lerner, J., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292CrossRef Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–108). New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805–824CrossRef Google Scholar

Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1986). Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282CrossRef Google Scholar

Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 409–431CrossRef Google Scholar

Luce, M. F.; Bettman, J.; & Payne, J. (1997). Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 384–405Google Scholar PubMed

Markman, K.; Gavanski, I.; Sherman, S. J.; & McMullen, M. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 588–595CrossRef Google Scholar

Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910–924CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions, 10, 210–214CrossRef Google Scholar

Mellers, B. A.; Schwartz, A.; Ho, K.; & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429CrossRef Google Scholar

Mellers, B. A.; Schwartz, A.; & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345CrossRef Google Scholar

Nygren, T.; Isen, A.; Taylor, P. J.; & Dulin, J. (1996). The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 59–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Parker, D.; Stradling, S. G.; & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Modifying beliefs and attitudes toward exceeding the speed limit: An intervention study based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427–1453CrossRef Google Scholar

Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263–277CrossRef Google Scholar

Sanna, L. J.Mental simulations, affective, and subjective confidence: Timing is everything. Psychological Science, 10, 339–345CrossRef

Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley

Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer and P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy?Psychological Science, 9, 340–346CrossRef Google Scholar

Schultz, W.; Apicella, P.; & Ljungberg, T. (1993). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 900–913CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schultz, W.; Apicella, P.; Scarnati, E.; & Ljungberg, T. (1992). Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4594–4610CrossRef Google Scholar

Schultz, W.; Dayan, P.; & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwartz, A. (1997). Expected feelings about risky options. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley

Schwartz, A.; Mellers, B. A.; & Metzger, T. (1998). Manipulating hedonic strategies of choice. In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, and D. Schum (Eds.), Decision research from Bayesian approaches to normative perspectives: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards. New York: Kluwer

Schwarz, N.; Bless, B.; & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161–199). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef

Shepperd, J. A., & McNulty, J. K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13, 85–88CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shepperd, J. A.; Ouellette, J. A.; & Fernandez, J. K. (1996). Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 844–855CrossRef Google Scholar

Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchasing decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 1–14CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, S. E., & Shepperd, J. A. (1998). Bracing for the worst: Severity, testing, and feedback as moderators of the optimistic bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 915–924CrossRef Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323CrossRef Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decisions. Psychological Science, 6, 358–361CrossRef Google Scholar

Tykocinski, O.; Pick, D.; & Kedmi, D. (2001). Retroactive pessimism: A different kind of hindsight bias. Manuscript under review

Van Dijk, W. W.; Zeelenberg, M.; & van der Pligt, J. (2001). Blessed are they who expect nothing: Lowering expectations as a way of avoiding disappointment. Manuscript under review

Wright, W., & Bower, G. (1992). Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 276–291CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeelenberg, M.; Dijk, W. W.; Manstead, A. S. R.; & Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 521–541CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeelenberg, M.; Dijk, W. W.; Pligt, J.; Manstead, A. S. R.; Empelen, P.; & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117–141CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Book contents

17 - Pleasure, Utility, and Choice

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive