Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:09:09.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Pleasure, Utility, and Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Barbara A. Mellers
Affiliation:
University of California
Antony S. R. Manstead
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Nico Frijda
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Agneta Fischer
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

When making choices, people usually imagine how they will feel about the consequences. This chapter provides an account of the anticipation process and uses it to predict choice. Decisions from several experiments are consistent with a theory in which people are assumed to evaluate alternatives by making trade-offs between predicted pleasure and pain. Then they choose the alternative with greater expected pleasure.

The field of decision making has long benefited from the interdisciplinary contributions of philosophers, economists, statisticians, and many others. These interdisciplinary contibutions can be categorized into two camps. One camp specifies how people should make choices if they wish to obey fundamental rules of logic and probability. The other camp focuses on what people actually do when making choices. While rational theories rely on beliefs and utilities, descriptive theories look to psychological processes including cognitive limitations, social norms, and cultural constraints to explain actual choices and the reasons behind alleged deviations from rationality.

Both camps are well aware that emotions influence choice. Rational theorists have addressed the question of whether emotions should influence choice, and descriptive theorists have explored how emotions influence choice. This chapter presents a descriptive account of decision making that focuses on anticipated pleasure. We propose that, when making a choice, people imagine how they will feel about future consequences. Comparisons of qualitatively different feelings are made in terms of pleasure and pain. That is, people evaluate each alternative by balancing imagined pleasure against imagined pain and select the alternative with greater average pleasure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Feelings and Emotions
The Amsterdam Symposium
, pp. 282 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bless, H.; Bohner, G.; Schwarz, N.; & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiter, H. C.; Aharon, I.; Kahneman, D.; Dale, A.; & Shizgal, P.Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639CrossRef
Clore, G. L., & Parrott, W. G. (1991). Moods and their vicissitudes: Thoughts and feelings as information. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 107–123). Oxford: Pergamon Press
Clore, G. L.; Schwarz, N.; & Conway, M. (1994). Emotion and information processing. In R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2d ed., pp. 323–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: New York Philosophical Library
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preferences for a non-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K. (1988). Emotional mood, cognitive style, and behavioral regulation. In K. Fiedler and J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 100–119). Toronto: Hoegrefe International
Forgas, J. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multi-process model. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 53–60). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason. New York: Norton
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gilbert, D. T.; Pinel, E. C.; Wilson, T. C.; Blumberg, S. J.; & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59, 667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. R., & March, J. G. (1984). Decision making and postdecision surprises. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 26–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, J. J.; Dyer, J. S.; & Jia, J. (1997). A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation. Marketing Science, 6, 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). New York: Guilford Press
Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2, 18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press
Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–108). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1986). Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, M. F.; Bettman, J.; & Payne, J. (1997). Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 384–405Google ScholarPubMed
Markman, K.; Gavanski, I.; Sherman, S. J.; & McMullen, M. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910–924CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions, 10, 210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B. A.; Schwartz, A.; Ho, K.; & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B. A.; Schwartz, A.; & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygren, T.; Isen, A.; Taylor, P. J.; & Dulin, J. (1996). The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D.; Stradling, S. G.; & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Modifying beliefs and attitudes toward exceeding the speed limit: An intervention study based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, L. J.Mental simulations, affective, and subjective confidence: Timing is everything. Psychological Science, 10, 339–345CrossRef
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley
Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer and P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy?Psychological Science, 9, 340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W.; Apicella, P.; & Ljungberg, T. (1993). Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 900–913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, W.; Apicella, P.; Scarnati, E.; & Ljungberg, T. (1992). Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4594–4610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W.; Dayan, P.; & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, A. (1997). Expected feelings about risky options. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley
Schwartz, A.; Mellers, B. A.; & Metzger, T. (1998). Manipulating hedonic strategies of choice. In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, and D. Schum (Eds.), Decision research from Bayesian approaches to normative perspectives: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards. New York: Kluwer
Schwarz, N.; Bless, B.; & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161–199). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Shepperd, J. A., & McNulty, J. K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13, 85–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepperd, J. A.; Ouellette, J. A.; & Fernandez, J. K. (1996). Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 844–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchasing decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E., & Shepperd, J. A. (1998). Bracing for the worst: Severity, testing, and feedback as moderators of the optimistic bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 915–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decisions. Psychological Science, 6, 358–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tykocinski, O.; Pick, D.; & Kedmi, D. (2001). Retroactive pessimism: A different kind of hindsight bias. Manuscript under review
Van Dijk, W. W.; Zeelenberg, M.; & van der Pligt, J. (2001). Blessed are they who expect nothing: Lowering expectations as a way of avoiding disappointment. Manuscript under review
Wright, W., & Bower, G. (1992). Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 276–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeelenberg, M.; Dijk, W. W.; Manstead, A. S. R.; & Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 521–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeelenberg, M.; Dijk, W. W.; Pligt, J.; Manstead, A. S. R.; Empelen, P.; & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×