Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:48:12.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Culture and Peer Feedback

from Section 1: - Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2019

By
Guangwei Hu
Edited by
Ken Hyland  and
Fiona Hyland
Ken Hyland
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Fiona Hyland
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Feedback in Second Language Writing
Contexts and Issues
 , pp. 45 - 63
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allaei, S. & Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration. The Writing Instructor, 10, 19–28.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (1999). TESOL and culture. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 625–54.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2016). Second language writing and culture. In Manchón, R. M. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing (pp. 545–65). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D & Sohn, J. (2013). Culture from the bottom up. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 68–99.Google Scholar
Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215–41.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. (2014). Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment – Student interaction and reflections. Computers and Composition, 34, 80–95.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). From intercultural rhetoric to cosmopolitan practice: Addressing new challenges in lingua franca English. In Belcher, D. & Nelson, G. (Eds.), Critical and Corpus-Based Approaches to Intercultural Rhetoric (pp. 203–26). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Carson, J. G. & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
DiPardo, A. & Freedman, S.W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58, 119–49.Google Scholar
Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing Groups: History, Theory and Implications. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Guardado, M. & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24, 443–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. (2013). Understanding Intercultural Communication: Negotiating a Grammar of Culture. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9, 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G. & Choo, L. (2016). The impact of disciplinary background and teaching experience on the use of evaluative language in teacher feedback. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22, 329–49.Google Scholar
Hu, G. & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371–94.Google Scholar
Hu, G. & Ren, H. (2012). The impact of experience and beliefs on Chinese EFL student writers’ feedback preferences. In Tang, R. (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 67–87). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006a). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006b). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (2017). Practising cultures of learning in internationalising universities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38, 237–50.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D. C .S., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1–23.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R. & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 7–27.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2014). Are ‘cultural differences a mere fiction?’: Reflections and arguments on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 104–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mistry, J., Li, J., Yoshikawa, H., Tseng, V., Tirrell, J., Kiang, L., … Wang, Y. (2016). An integrated conceptual framework for the development of Asian American children and youth. Child Development, 87, 1014–32.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L & Carson, J. G. (1995). Social dimensions of second-language writing instruction: Peer response groups as cultural context. In Rubin, D. L. (Ed.), Composing Social Identity in Written Communication (pp. 89–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113–31.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J. G. (2006). Cultural issues in peer response: Revisiting ‘culture’. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp.42–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). Modifying L2 criticisms: How learners do it? Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 768–91.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruecker, T. (2011). The potential of dual-language cross-cultural peer review. ELT Journal, 65, 398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 765–74.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147–70.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. M. Y. (2010). Cultural contexts and situated possibilities in the teaching of second language writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 364–75.Google Scholar
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 23–41). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, L. & Mertova, P. (2007). Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weisner, T. S. (2009). Culture, development, and diversity: Expectable pluralism, conflict, and similarity. Ethos, 37, 181–96.Google Scholar
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Hu, G. (2017a). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback? Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 178–92.Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Hu, G. (2017b). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25–35.Google Scholar
Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49, 461–93.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016). Revisiting Chinese cultural issues in peer feedback in EFL writing: Insights from a multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 295–304.Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1997). Towards a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 341–52Google Scholar
Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68, 155–68.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×