Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- 2 Sociocultural Theory
- 3 Culture and Peer Feedback
- 4 Appropriation, Ownership, and Agency
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
4 - Appropriation, Ownership, and Agency
Negotiating Teacher Feedback in Academic Settings
from Section 1: - Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2019
Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- 2 Sociocultural Theory
- 3 Culture and Peer Feedback
- 4 Appropriation, Ownership, and Agency
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feedback in Second Language WritingContexts and Issues, pp. 64 - 82Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (Emerson, C. & Holquist, M., Trans.; Holquist, M., Ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (McGee, V. W., Trans.; Emerson, C. & Holquist, M., Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23–34.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. & Connor, U. (Eds.) (2001) Reflections on Multiliterate Lives. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Written Communication, 11, 125–69.Google Scholar
Braine, G. (Ed.) (1999). Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brannon, L. & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157–66.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2015). “Blessed in my own way”: Pedagogical affordances for dialogical voice construction in multilingual student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 122–39.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Goldstein, L. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 147–79.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 165–93.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L. M. (2016). Making use of teacher feedback. In Manchón, R. M. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing (pp. 407–30). Boston/Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher-written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2, 149–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kamberelis, G. & Scott, K. D. (1992). Other people’s voices: The coarticulation of texts and subjectivities. Linguistics and Education, 4, 359–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W. (2018). Role reversals: A case study of dialogic interactions and feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishino, T. & Atkinson, D. (2015). Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37–54.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9–31.Google Scholar
Onore, C. (1989). The student, the teacher, and the text: Negotiating meanings through response and revision. In Anson, C. (Ed.), Writing and Response: Theory, Practice and Research (pp. 231–60). Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201–30.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 253–69.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2000). The social politics and the cultural politics of language classrooms. In Hall, J. K. & Eggington, W. G. (Eds.), The Sociopolitics of English Language Teaching (pp. 89–103). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prior, P. A. (2001). Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 55–81.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–54.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society, 24, 1–28.Google Scholar
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148–56.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Villanueva, V. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American Academic of Color. Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. (Matejka, L. & Titunik, I. R., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by