Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-12T01:04:36.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Transfer Dependence and Regional Disparities in Nigerian Federalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

By
Tamar Asadurian ,
Emmanuel Nnadozie  and
Leonard Wantchekon
Edited by
Jessica Wallack  and
T. N. Srinivasan
Tamar Asadurian
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Candidate Department of Politics, New York University
Emmanuel Nnadozie
Affiliation:
Senior Economic Affairs Officer, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa
Leonard Wantchekon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Politics, Economics, and Africana Studies, New York University
Jessica Wallack
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
T. N. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The entire history of Nigeria has been characterized by conflict among regions, social classes, and ethno-religious groups over resource allocation. Exploitation of oil deposits in the East and Midwest in the 1960s has only added to the intensity of the conflict: There have been over fifty ethno-religious conflicts and numerous other types of conflict since 1960. Regional disparities are widely perceived as one of the causes of continuing ethnic tensions in Nigeria. According to Post and Vickers (1973, p. 58), the most important grievance of various regions since the early 1950s has been that their wealth was being used to subsidize poorer regions.

Nigeria's recent history has also been characterized by extremely centralized political and economic power. Of the country's forty-three years of independence (obtained from Britain in 1960), twenty-eight have been under military rule. The country was nominally a federation at this point, but local leaders were appointed by the central government. Local elections have come with the recent transition to democracy, but the center still dominates via its control over resources and the allocation of the transfers that make up a large portion of their budgets.

This chapter focuses on how Nigerian fiscal federalism, especially the characteristics of the country's system for transfers to state and local governments, has affected and been affected by these regional disparities and tradition of centralization. Overall, we argue that Nigeria is not fiscally federalist but, rather, a de facto centralized distributive state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Federalism and Economic Reform
International Perspectives
 , pp. 407 - 455
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, C. S., and O'Connell, S. A. (1999). “Aid, Taxation, and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Economics and Politics 11 (3): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agiobenebo, T. (1999). “Assignment, Criteria and the Fiscal Constitution: An Excursion into a Theory of Rational Fiscal Federalism,” in Aigbokan, B, ed. Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development: Selected Papers from the 1999 Annual Conference of the Nigerian Economic Society pp. 25–51. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society.Google Scholar
Ahmad, E., and E. Mottu (2002). “Oil-Revenue Assignments: Country Experiences and Issues,” IMF Working Paper No. 02/203.
Ahmad, E., and R. Singh (2003). “Political Economy of Oil-Revenue Sharing in a Developing Country: Illustrations from Nigeria,” IMF Working Paper No. 03/16.
Aka, Ebenezer O. (2000). Regional Disparities in Nigeria's Development: Lessons and Challenges for the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Akpan, G. E. (1999). “Fiscal Potentials and Dependence in Nigeria,” in Aigbokan, B, ed. Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development pp. 73–100. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society.
Azam, J.-P. (1995). “How to Pay for the Peace? A Theoretical Framework with Reference to African Countries,” Public Choice 83: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azam, J.-P. (2001). “The Redistributive State and Conflict in Africa,” Journal and Peace Research 38(4): 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, P. (2002). “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(4): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, D., Collier, P., and Gunning, J. W. (1992). Nigeria: Policy Responses to Shocks, 1970–1990, An International Center for Economic Growth Publication. San Francisco: ICS Press. Constitution of Nigeria (1999).Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1992). “The State as Problem and Solution: Predatum, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change,” in Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R., eds., The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State p. 8. Princeton: Princeton University Press: pp. 139–181.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Idachaba, F. S. (1989). “State-Federal Relations in Nigerian Agriculture,” MADIA Discussion Paper 8. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review 45(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
McGuire, M. C., and , M. Olson Jr. (1996). “The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force,” Journal of Economic Literature 34(1): 72–96.Google Scholar
Government of Nigeria, Federal Office of Statistics. National Consumer Survey (NCS), various years.
Nnadozie, E. (1995). Oil and Socioeconomic Crisis in Nigeria: A Regional Perspective to the Nigerian Disease and the Rural Sector. Lewiston: Mellen University Press.Google Scholar
Nnadozie, E. (2002). “Are Growth and Development Constitutional Issues in Nigeria?,” Paper presented at the Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford Conference 2002, “Understanding Poverty and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa,” St. Catherine's College, 18–19 March 2002.
Nwuke, K. O. (2001). “Managing Multi-Ethnicity: Lessons from Nigeria,” paper presented at the Institute on Race and Social Division, Boston University.
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Odedokun, M. O. (1990). “Flow-of-Funds as a Tool for Analysing Budgetary Behaviour of Nigerian State Governments: Evidence from the Civilian Era,” World Development 18(5): 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okigbo, P. N. C. (1965). Nigerian Public Finance, African Studies Series, No. 15. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Okigbo, P. N. C. (1989). National Development Planning in Nigeria 1900–92, London: Currey.Google Scholar
Okoh, R. N., and Egbon, P. C. (1999). “Fiscal Federalism and Revenue Allocation: The Poverty of the Niger Delta,” in Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society: 405–419.Google Scholar
Olomola, A. S. (1999). “Restructuring Nigeria's Fiscal System: Rationale, Strategies and Policies,” in Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society: 477–499.Google Scholar
Osaghae, E. E. (1998). Crippled Giant: Nigeria since Independence. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Post, K., and Vickers, M. (1973). Structure and Conflict in Nigeria 1960–65. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2001). “Creating a More Perfect Union: Electoral Incentives and the Reform of Federal Systems.” MIT, mimeo.
Salisu, M. (2001). “Incentive Structure, Civil Service Efficiency and the Hidden Economy in Nigeria,” Discussion Paper No 2001/86, United Nations University.
Soludo, C. C. (2001). “Growth Models and Regional Divergence: Implications for Public Policy in Nigeria,” Department of Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Tanzi, V. (1995). “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects,” in Bruuo, M., and B. Pleskovic, eds. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995: 295–316.
Tiebout, C. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (1995). Human Development Report 1994. New York: United Nations.
UNDP (1997). Human Development Report, Nigeria 1996. United Nations Development Programme, Lagos, Nigeria.
UNDP (2002). Human Development Report 2002, available at www.UNDP.org.
UNDP (2003). Human Development Report 2003, available at www.UNDP.org.
Wantchekon, L. (2002). “Why Do Resource Abundant Countries Have Authoritarian Governments?,” Journal of African Finance and Economic Development 5(2): 17–56.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1995). “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Wibbels, E. (2000). “Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance,” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (1965). “Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 13: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2002). World Bank Africa Database, Washington DC: The World Bank.
Yeniki, S. (1992). The Politics of Revenue Allocation in Nigeria. Lagos: Batnam Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×