Book contents
- The Faust Legend
- The Faust Legend
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Prologue
- Chapter 1 The Background of the Faust Legend
- Chapter 2 Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus
- Chapter 3 Goethe’s Faust
- Chapter 4 Post-Goethe Dramatic Versions of the Faust Legend
- Chapter 5 Cinematic Fausts
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2019
Book contents
- The Faust Legend
- The Faust Legend
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Prologue
- Chapter 1 The Background of the Faust Legend
- Chapter 2 Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus
- Chapter 3 Goethe’s Faust
- Chapter 4 Post-Goethe Dramatic Versions of the Faust Legend
- Chapter 5 Cinematic Fausts
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Faust LegendFrom Marlowe and Goethe to Contemporary Drama and Film, pp. 244 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alt, Peter-Andre. “Mephisto’s Principles: On the Construction of Evil in Goethe’s Faust I.” Modern Language Review, 106/1 (2011): 149–63.Google Scholar
Altman, Joel B. The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, ed. Morris, William. New College Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.Google Scholar
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 4th edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000.Google Scholar
Ammerlahn, Hellmut. “From Haunting Visions to Revealing (Self-) Reflections: The Goethean Hero between Subject and Object.” In Richter, and Block, (eds.), Goethe’s Ghosts, 97–110.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologica, trans. fathers of the English Dominican Province. Vol. xx. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.Google Scholar
Atkins, Stuart. Goethe’s Faust: A Literary Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Bahr, Ehrhard. “Václav Havel’s Faust Drama Temptation (1985): Or, The Challenge of Influence.” Goethe Yearbook, 7 (1994): 194–209.Google Scholar
Bakeless, John. The Tragicall History of Christopher Marlowe, vol. i. Hamden, CT: Archon, 1964.Google Scholar
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “Faust and the Ethos of Technology.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 29–42.Google Scholar
Baron, Frank. Doctor Faustus from History to Legend. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Baron, Frank.“Georg Lukàcs on the Origin of the Faust Legend.” In Boemer, and Johnson, (eds.), Faust through Four Centuries, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Emily. Spectacles of Strangeness: Imperialism, Alienation, and Marlowe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker-Cantarino, Barbara. “Goethe and Gender.” In Sharp, Lesley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Goethe, 179–92. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Berghahn, Klaus L. “Georg Johann Heinrich Faust: The Myth and its History.” In Grimm, Reinhold and Hermand, Jost (eds.), Our Faust? Roots and Ramifications of a Modern German Myth, 3–21. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution, trans. Mitchell, Arthur. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1998.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. From Mankind to Marlowe: Growth of Structure in the Popular Drama of Tudor England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bevington, David.“Marlowe and God.” Explorations in Renaissance Culture, 17 (1991): 1–38.Google Scholar
Bevington, David.“The Performance History.” In Deats, (ed.), Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide, 41–71.Google Scholar
Bevington, David, and Rasmussen, Eric. “Introduction” to Marlowe, Doctor Faustus, ed. Bevington, and Rasmussen, .Google Scholar
Bishop, Paul.(ed.). A Companion to Goethe’s Faust, Parts I and II. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2001.Google Scholar
Björkman, Edwin. “Introduction” to Ficke, Mr. Faust.Google Scholar
Blackall, Eric A. “What the devil?—Twentieth-Century Fausts.” In Boemer, and Johnson, (eds.), Faust through Four Centuries, 197–212.Google Scholar
Bluestone, Max. “Libido Speculandi: Doctrine and Dramaturgy in Contemporary Interpretations of Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.” In Rabkin, Norman (ed.), Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama, 33–88. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Boemer, Peter, and Johnson, Sidney (eds.). Faust through Four Centuries: Retrospect and Analysis. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
Boer, Roland. “Utopia, Religion and the God-Builders from Anatoly Lunacharsky to Ernest Block.” In Tomoiaga, Ligia, Barbul, Minodorä, and Demarcsek, Ramona (eds.), From Francis Bacon to William Golding: Utopias and Dystopias of Today and of Yore, 2–20. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.Google Scholar
Borchmeyer, Dieter. “Mephisto or the Spirit of Laughter,” trans. Lene Heilmann. In Richter, and Block, (eds.), Goethe’s Ghosts, 111–25.Google Scholar
Bradbrook, M. C. Themes and Conventions of Elizabethan Tragedy. Cambridge University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Brandt, Bruce. “The Critical Backstory.” In Deats, (ed.), Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide, 17–40.Google Scholar
Bray, Suzanne. “Temptations for the Time in the Mystical Rewritings of British Christian Authors 1933–1945.” In Bray, Suzanne, Adrienne, E. Gavin, and Peter, Merchant (eds.), Re-Embroidering the Robe: Faith, Myth and Literary Creation since 1850, 127–43. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2008.Google Scholar
Brooke, Nicholas. “The Moral Tragedy of Doctor Faustus.” Cambridge Journal, 5 (1952): 662–87.Google Scholar
Brough, Neil. New Perspectives of Faust: Studies in the Origins and Philosophy of the Faust Theme in the Dramas of Marlowe and Goethe. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar
Brown, Jane K. “Faust.” In Sharp, Lesley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Goethe. 84–100. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jane K.Goethe’s Faust: The German Tragedy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Brown, Jane K.“The Prosperous Wonder Worker: Faust in the Renaissance.” In Boemer, and Johnson, (eds.), Faust through Four Centuries, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jane K., Lee, Meredith, Saine, Thomas P., Hernadi, Paul, and Hamlin, Cyrus (eds.). Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today. Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1994.Google Scholar
Bush, Andrew. “Remembering Faust in Argentina.” In Fitzsimmons, Lorna (ed.), Goethe’s Faust and Cultural Memory, 91–106. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. The Institution of the Christian Religion, trans. Thomas Norton. Glasgow: Printed by John Bryce and Archibald M’Lean, junior, for Alexander Irving, 1762.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Michael. “The Playwright as Miracle Worker: An Irish Faustus.” Deus Loci: The Lawrence Durrell Newsletter, 3/4 (1980): 3–12.Google Scholar
Castle, Dorothy. The Diabolical Game to Win Man’s Soul: A Rhetorical and Structural Approach to Mankind. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession: Ovid, Spenser, Counter-Nationhood. University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Christensen, Peter G. “Lawrence Durrell’s Plays: A Reevaluation.” In Kersnowski, Frank (ed.), Into the Labyrinth: Essays on the Art of Lawrence Durrell, 73–85. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine, Clément. “Sorties: Out and Out: Attacks/Ways Out/Forays.” In Cixous, Clément, The Newly Born Woman, trans. Betsy Wing, 63–134. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Coghill, Nevill, and Burton, Richard (dirs.). The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus. Film. 1967.Google Scholar
Cole, Douglas.Suffering and Evil in the Plays of Christopher Marlowe. Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Cooksey, Thomas. “‘Talk not of a wife’: The Devil and Daniel Webster, A Cabin in the Sky, and Damn Yankees – American Contributions to the Faust Myth.” Journal of Popular Film and Television, 27 (1999): 18–27.Google Scholar
Copeland, Matt, and Goering, Chris. “Blues You Can Use: Teaching the Faust Theme through Music, Literature, and Film.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46 (2003): 436–41.Google Scholar
Cox, John D. The Devil and the Sacred in English Drama, 1350–1642. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Craik, T. W. “Faustus’ Damnation Reconsidered.” Renaissance Drama, n.s. 2 (1969): 189–96.Google Scholar
Danson, Lawrence. “Christopher Marlowe: The Questioner.” English Literary Renaissance, 12 (1982): 3–29.Google Scholar
Davidson, Clifford. “Doctor Faustus of Wittenberg.” Studies in Philology, 59 (1962): 514–23.Google Scholar
Davidson, Clifford.Visualizing the Moral Life: Medieval Iconography and the Macro Morality Plays. New York: AMC Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara Munson. “Biblical Allusion in Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.” Medievalia et Humanistica, n.s. 10 (1981): 203–16.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara“Doctor Faustus.” In Deats, Sara Munson and Logan, Robert A. (eds.), Christopher Marlowe at 450, 71–100. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara“Doctor Faustus: From Chapbook to Tragedy.” Essays in Literature, 3 (1976): 3–16.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara“‘Mark this show’: Magic and Theater in Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.” In Deats, Sara Munson and Logan, Robert A. (eds.), Placing the Plays of Christopher Marlowe, 13–24. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara“Marlowe’s Interrogative Drama: Dido, Tamburlaine, Faustus, and Edward II.” In Deats, Sara Munson and Logan, Robert A. (eds.), Marlowe’s Empery: Expanding His Critical Contexts, 107–32. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara“Mars or Gorgon? Tamburlaine and Henry V.” Marlowe Studies: An Annual, 1 (2011): 99–124.Google Scholar
Deats, SaraSex, Gender, and Desire in the Plays of Christopher Marlowe. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dent, R. W. “Ramist Faustus or Ramist Marlowe?” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 73 (1972): 63–74.Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy, and Lyengar, Sujata. “Adaptation, Appropriation, or What You Will.” Shakespeare, 11/1 (February 2015): 10–19.Google Scholar
Destro, Alberto. “The Guilty Hero, or the Tragic Salvation of Faust.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 56–75.Google Scholar
Diehl, Huston. Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theatre in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Richard. Bernard Shaw’s Novels: Portraits of the Artist as Man and Superman. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1996.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology, and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Duane, Carol Leventen. “Marlowe’s Mixed Messages: A Model for Shakespeare?” Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, 3 (1986): 51–67.Google Scholar
Durrani, Osman. “The Character and Qualities of Mephistopheles.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 76–94.Google Scholar
Durrell, Lawrence. An Irish Faustus: A Morality in Nine Scenes. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1964.Google Scholar
Duxfield, Andrew. “Doctor Faustus and Renaissance Hermeticism.” In Deats, (ed.), Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide, 96–110.Google Scholar
Dye, Ellis. “Figurations of the Feminine in Goethe’s Faust.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 95–121.Google Scholar
Eder, Bruce, and Smith, Steven C.. “Commentary” to The Devil and Daniel Webster, dir. William Dieterle. Criterion Collection DVD.Google Scholar
Empson, William. Faustus and the Censor: The English Faust-book and Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Erben, Joan. “The Spirit from Below: A Theoretical Approach to Václav Havel’s Temptation.” European Studies Journal, 15 (1998): 10–19.Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, R. J. “A Pre-1592 English Faust Book and the Date of Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.” Library, 2 (2001): 327–35.Google Scholar
Fergusson, Francis. “The Theater of Paul Valéry.” In Paul Valéry, Plays, trans. David Paul and Robert Fitzgerald, vii–xix. New York: Pantheon, 1960.Google Scholar
Fetters, Paul R. “Dorothy Sayers and the Wiles of the Wicked One as Observed in her Contribution to the Faustus Legend, The Devil to Pay.” Inklings Forever, 5 (2006), unpaginated.Google Scholar
Ficke, Arthur DavisonMr. Faust: An Entirely New Version, Reconstructed for Stage Production. New York: Frank Shay, 1922.Google Scholar
Findlay, Alison. A Feminist Perspective on Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. “Doctor Faustus and the Lutheran Aesthetic.” English Literary Renaissance, 35 (2005): 187–209.Google Scholar
French, A. L. “The Philosophy of Dr. Faustus.” Essays in Criticism, 20 (1970): 123–42.Google Scholar
Fuller, Graham. “Devil’s Pact: Goethe’s Morality Tale Revisited.” Modern Picture, 25 (2013): 57.Google Scholar
Gaier, Ulrich. “Schwankende Gestalten: Virtuality in Goethe’s Faust.” In Schulte, Noyes, and Kleber, (eds.), Theatre of Modernity, 54–67.Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen. “Milton’s ‘Satan’ and the Theme of Damnation in Elizabethan Tragedy.” English Studies, 1 (1948): 46–66.Google Scholar
The 1560 Geneva New Testament. ed. Brown, David L. and Noah, William H.. Murfreesboro, TN: Avalon Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ghelderode, Michel de. The Death of Doctor Faust, in Michel de Ghelderode, Seven Plays, trans. George Hauger, vol. ii. New York: Hill & Wang, 1950.Google Scholar
Gilman, Ernest B. The Curious Perspective: Literary and Pictorial Wit in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Faust, Part I & II, ed. and trans. Passage, Charles E.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang vonFaust. Part One, trans. David Luke. Oxford University Press, 2008 (1st edn. 1987).Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang vonFaust. Part Two, trans. David Luke. Oxford University Press, 1998 (1st edn. 1984).Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang vonFaust: A Tragedy, trans. Walter Arndt, ed. Hamlin, Cyrus. 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton, 2001 (1st edn. 1976).Google Scholar
Goetz-Stankiewicz, Marketa. “Variations of Temptation – Václav Havel’s Politics of Language.” In Goetz-Stankiewicz, Marketa and Carey, Phyllis (eds.), Critical Essays on Václav Havel, 228–42. New York: G. K. Hall, 1999.Google Scholar
Grantley, Darryll. “‘What means this Show?’: Theatricalism, Camp, and Subversion in Doctor Faustus and The Jew of Malta.” In Grantley, Darryll and Roberts, Peter (eds.), Christopher Marlowe and English Renaissance Culture, 224–38. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gray, Richard T. “Shipwreck with Spectators: Ideologies of Observation in Goethe’s Faust, Part II.” In Richter, and Block, (eds.), Goethe’s Ghosts, 126–48.Google Scholar
Grode, Eric. “Dueling Mentors Bedevil a Dithering Young Dane.” New York Times, March 30, 2011.Google Scholar
Haile, H. G. “Introduction” to Haile, H. G. (ed.), The History of Doctor Johann Faustus. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus.“Tracking the Eternal-Feminine in Goethe’s Faust II.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 142–57.Google Scholar
Hardison, O. B. Christian Rite and Christian Drama in the Middle Ages. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Gail K. “Das Ewig-Weibliche nasführet dich: Feminine Leadership in Goethe’s Faust and Sacher-Masoch’s Venus.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 112–22.Google Scholar
Harvey, Dennis. “Review: ‘Dr. Faustus.’” Variety, March 9, 2004, variety.com/2004/legit/reviews/dr-faustus-1200534615.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sherman. “The Education of Faustus.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 6 (1966): 193–209.Google Scholar
Healy, Thomas. “Doctor Faustus.” In Cheney, Patrick (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe, 174–92. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hedges, Inez. Framing Faust: Twentieth-Century Cultural Struggles. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Heller, Otto. Faust and Faustus: A Study of Goethe’s Relationship to Marlowe. New York: Cooper Square, 1972.Google Scholar
Hoelzel, Alfred. The Paradoxical Quest: A Study of Faustian Vicissitudes. New York: Peter Lang, 1988.Google Scholar
Honderich, Pauline. “John Calvin and Doctor Faustus.” Modern Language Review, 68 (1973): 1–13.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard. Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, in The Works of Richard Hooker, ed. John, Keble, vol. ii. New York: Burt Franklin Press, 1888.Google Scholar
Hughes, Paul L., and Larkin, James F. (eds.). Royal Tudor Proclamations. 3 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964–69.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. “Five-Act Structure in ‘Doctor Faustus.’” Tulane Drama Review, 8/4 (1964): 77–91.Google Scholar
Hurwitt, Robert. “Wittenberg Review: A Pop Culture Hamlet Primer.” SFGate, April 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Ilgner, Richard. “Goethe’s ‘Geist, der stets vemeint’ and its Emergence in the Faust Works of Odoevvsky, Lunacharsky, and Bulgakov.” Germano-Slavica: A Canadian Journal of Germanic and Slavic Comparative Studies, 2 (1977): 169–80.Google Scholar
Ingram, R. W. “‘Pride in learning goeth before a fall’: Dr. Faustus’ Opening Soliloquy.” Mosaic, 13/1 (Fall 1979): 73–80.Google Scholar
James VI and I (King). Daemonologie. A facsimile edn. Amsterdam: Da Capo Press, 1969 (1st edn. 1597.)Google Scholar
John, David G. “The Complete Faust on Stage: Peter Stein and the Goetheanum.” In Fitzsimmons, Lorna (ed.), Goethe’s Faust and Cultural Memory, 107–28. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnson, Francis R. “Marlowe’s Astronomy and Renaissance Skepticism.” English Literary History, 13 (1946): 241–54.Google Scholar
Johnson, Francis R.“Marlowe’s ‘Imperiall Heaven.’” English Literary History, 12 (1945): 35–44.Google Scholar
Jones, Caryn. “A Passive Faust Goes to the Devil Slowly.” New York Times, October 26, 1994.Google Scholar
John Henry, Jones (ed.). The English Faust Book: A Critical Edition Based on the Text of 1592. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jump, John D. “Introduction” to Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus. ed. Jump, John D.. Revels Plays. London: Methuen, 1962.Google Scholar
Kahler, Erich. “Doctor Faustus from Adam to Sartre.” Comparative Drama, 1/2 (1967): 75–92.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter. “Editor’s Note” to Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In The Portable Nietzsche, ed. and trans. Walter Kaufmann, 115–90. New York: Viking, 1968.Google Scholar
Keefer, Michael H. “Right Eye and Left Heel: Ideological Origins of the Legend of Faustus.” Mosaic, 22 (1989): 83–84.Google Scholar
Kelley, Michael. Flamboyant Drama: A Study of The Castle of Perseverance, Mankind, and Wisdom. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry Ansgar. The Devil, Demonology, and Witchcraft: The Development of Christian Beliefs in Evil Spirits. New York: Doubleday, 1974 (1st edn. 1968).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. “Introduction” to Sand, Seven Strings of the Lyre.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin B. The Playwright as Magician: Shakespeare’s Image of the Poet in the English Public Theatre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kiebuzińska, Christine. “Witkacy and Ghelderode: Goethe’s Faust Transformed into a Grotesque Cabaret.” Polish Journal of Aesthetics, 31 (2013): 207–20.Google Scholar
Kiessling, Nicolas. “Doctor Faustus and the Sin of Demoniality.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 15 (1975): 205–11.Google Scholar
King, Christa Knellwolf. Faustus and the Promises of the New Science, c. 1580–1730. Farnham: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, Leo. “Marlowe’s Faustus: A Reconsideration,” Review of English Studies, 19/75 (1943): 225–41.Google Scholar
Kocher, Paul. Christopher Marlowe: A Study of His Thought, Learning, and Character. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Kramer, Heinrich, and Sprenger, James. The Malleus Maleficarum of Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger, trans. Montague, Summers, vol. i. New York: Dover, 1971.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. “Seventeenth Letter on Literature” and “Berlin Scenario.” In sft, 274–79. New York: Octagon, 1966.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold EphraimWerke, ed. Herbert G. Göpfert. 8 vols. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1970–79.Google Scholar
Lester, G. A. (ed.), Three Late Medieval Morality Plays: Mankind, Everyman, Mundus et Infans. New Mermaids. London: A & C Black, 1981.Google Scholar
Levin, Harry. Christopher Marlowe: The Overreacher. Boston: Beacon Press, 1962 (1st edn. 1952).Google Scholar
Logan, Robert A. Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra, and the Nature of Fame. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2018.Google Scholar
Logan, Robert A.Shakespeare’s Marlowe: The Influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Logan, Robert A.“Violence, Terrorism, and War.” In Deats, Sara Munson, Lenker, Lagretta Tallent, and Perry, Merry G. (eds.), War and Words: Horror and Heroism in the Literature of Warfare, 65–81. New York: Lexington, 2004.Google Scholar
Lunacharski, A. V. Three Plays of A. V. Lunacharski, trans. Magnus, Leonard Arthur and Walker, Karl. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1923.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. New York: Viking, 2010.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie. Helen of Troy: From Homer to Hollywood. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. “Epilogue: Marlowe in tempore belli.” In Deats, Sara Munson, Lenker, Lagretta Tallent, and Perry, Merry G. (eds.), War and Words: Horror and Heroism in the Literature of Warfare, 295–316. New York: Lexington, 2004.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S.“Textual Indeterminacy and Ideological Difference: The Case of Doctor Faustus.” Renaissance Drama, n.s. 20 (1989): 1–29.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus: The A- and B-Texts (1604, 1616), ed. Bevington, David and Rasmussen, Eric. Manchester University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Marlowe, ChristopherDoctor Faustus and Other Plays, ed. David Bevington and Eric Rasmussen. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McAdam, Ian. The Irony of Identity: Self and Imagination in the Drama of Christopher Marlowe. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999.Google Scholar
McCullen, Joseph T. “Dr. Faustus and Renaissance Learning.” Modern Language Review, 51 (1956): 6–16.Google Scholar
Mebane, John. Renaissance Magic and the Return of the Golden Age. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mills, David (ed.). The Chester Mystery Cycle: A New Edition with Modernised Spelling. East Lansing, MI: Colleagues Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. “Goethe’s Faust as a Modern Epic.” In Goethe, Faust, ed. Hamlin, , 611–33.Google Scholar
Mountfort, William. The Life and Death of Doctor Faustus: Made into a Farce. London: Printed and sold by E. Whitelock near Stationers’ Hall, 1697.Google Scholar
Nemoianu, Virgil. “Absorbing Modernization: The Dilemmas of Progress in the Novels of Walter Scott and in Faust II.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 1–16.Google Scholar
Nuttall, A. D. The Alternative Trinity: Gnostic Heresy in Marlowe, Milton, and Blake. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Okerlund, A. N. “The Intellectual Folly of Dr. Faustus.” Studies in Philology, 74 (1977): 258–78.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Robert. “The Comic Synthesis in Doctor Faustus.” English Literary History, 22 (1955): 165–72.Google Scholar
Palmer, Philip Mason, and More, Robert Pattison. The Sources of the Faust Tradition: From Simon Magus to Lessing. New York: Octagon, 1966.Google Scholar
Parker, Barbara. “‘Cursed Necromancy’: Marlowe’s Faustus as Anti-Catholic Satire.” Marlowe Studies, 1 (2011): 59–77.Google Scholar
Parker, John. The Aesthetics of Antichrist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pelikan, Jaroslav. “Faust as Doctor of Theology.” In Goethe, Faust, ed. Hamlin, , 586–97.Google Scholar
Phelan, Anthony. “The Classical and the Medieval in Faust II.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 143–67.Google Scholar
Pilz, Dirk. “A Contradictory Whole: Peter Stein stages Faust.” In Schulte, Noyes, and Kleber, (eds.), Theatre of Modernity, 280–92.Google Scholar
Poole, Kristin. “Dr. Faustus and Reformation Theology.” In Sullivan, Garrett, Jr., Cheney, Patrick, and Hadfield, Andrew (eds.), Early Modern English Drama: A Critical Companion, 96–107. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Reich, Ronni. “‘Wittenberg’ Review: Hamlet and Faustus as Bros with Big Ideas.” Star-Ledger, September 16, 2014.Google Scholar
Ribner, Irving. “Introduction” to Christopher Marlowe,The Complete Plays, ed. Ribner, Irving. New York: Odyssey Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Richter, Simon, and Block, Richard (eds.), Goethe’s Ghosts: Reading and the Persistence of Literature. New York: Camden House, 2013.Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth. “Necromantic Books: Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus, and Agrippa of Nettesheim.” In Grantley, Darryll and Roberts, Peter (eds.), Christopher Marlowe and English Renaissance Culture, 148–71. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Robertson, Ritchie. “Literary Techniques and Aesthetic Texture in Faust.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 1–27.Google Scholar
Rose, William. “Introduction” to William Rose (ed.), The Historie of the Damnable Life and Deserved Death of Doctor John Faustus. University of Notre Dame Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Roston, Murray. Biblical Drama in England. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rupp, E. Gordon, Philip S. Watson, (ed. and trans.). Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Russell, Jeffrey Burton. Mephistopheles: The Devil in the Modern World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Rutter, Tom. The Cambridge Introduction to Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sachs, Ariel. “The Religious Despair of Doctor Faustus.” Journal of English and German Philology, 63 (1964): 625–47.Google Scholar
Sam, Martina Maria. Rudolf Steiners Faust-Rezeption: Interpretationen und Imaginationen als Vorbereitung der Welturaufführung des gesamten Goetheschen Faust 1938. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Sand, George. A Woman’s Version of the Faust Legend: The Seven Strings of the Lyre, trans. and ed. Kennedy, George A.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Sanders, Wilbur. The Dramatist and the Received Idea: Studies in the Plays of Marlowe and Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe. New York: Doubleday, 1938 (1st edn. 1910.)Google Scholar
Schlueter, June. Metafictional Characters in Modern Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schöfsler, Franziska. “Progress and Restorative Utopia in Faust II and Wilhelm Meisters Wanderjahre.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 169–93.Google Scholar
Schulte, Hans. “Introduction” to Schulte, Noyes, and Kleber, (eds.), Theatre of Modernity. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schulte, Hans, Noyes, John, and Kleber, Pia (eds.), Goethe’s Faust: Theatre of Modernity. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Christoph E. “Gretchen and the Feminine in Goethe’s Faust.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 133–41.Google Scholar
Shafer, Ingrid H. “‘The Phenomenon of Faust’: The Faust Challenge: Science as Diabolic or Divine.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 40/4 (December 2005): 891–915.Google Scholar
Shapiro, James. Rival Playwrights: Marlowe, Jonson, Shakespeare. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, rev. and ed. Onions, C. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Michael J., and Chapman, Wayne K., “Introduction” to W. B. Yeats, The Countess Cathleen: Manuscript Materials, ed. Sidnell, Michael J. and Chapman, Wayne K.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Simpson, Patricia Anne. “Gretchen’s Ghosts: Goethe, Adorno, and the Literature of Refuge.” In Richter, and Block, (eds.), Goethe’s Ghosts, 168–85.Google Scholar
Singer, Robert. “The Merlin/Faust Archetypes in Excalibur and Angel Street,” in Spivack, Charlotte (ed.), Merlin Versus Faust: Contending Archetypes in Western Culture, 95–113. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Singer, Robert.“One Against All: The New England Past and Present Responsibilities in The Devil and Daniel Webster.” Literature/Film Quarterly, 22 (1994): 265–71.Google Scholar
Snyder, Susan. “The Left Hand of God: Despair in the Medieval and Renaissance Tradition.” Studies in the Renaissance, 12 (1965): 18–59.Google Scholar
Spinard, Phoebe S. “The Dilettante Lie in Doctor Faustus.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 24 (1982): 243–54.Google Scholar
Spivack, Bernard. Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Stachniewski, John. The Persecutory Imagination: English Puritanism and the Literature of Religious Despair. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Stambaugh, Sara. “Review of A Woman’s Version of the Faust Legend: The Seven Strings of the Lyre.” Victorian Review, 16/1 (1990): 83–85.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. “Directing Faust: An Interview.” In Schulte, Noyes, and Kleber, (eds.), Theatre of Modernity, 267–79. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sterritt, David. “‘I Married a Witch’ and ‘The Beauty of the Devil.’” Cineaste, 39/2 (2014): 50–52.Google Scholar
Stoll, Elmer Edgar. “The Objectivity of the Ghosts in Shakspere.” PMLA, 22/2 (1907): 201–33.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor. “Valéry: A Memoir.” In Paul Valéry, Plays, trans. Paul, David and Fitzgerald, Robert, xx–xxv. New York: Pantheon, 1960.Google Scholar
Swales, Martin. “The Character and Characterization of Faust.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 28–55.Google Scholar
Swales, Martin.‘Theater Abroad: Goethe Go Home.’ Time Magazine, 83/1 (January 3 1964): 56.Google Scholar
The Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England. London: Printed in Powles Church Yard by Richard Jugg and John Cawood, 1563.Google Scholar
Tobin, Robert. “Faust’s Membership in Male Society: Prometheus and Ganymede as Models.” In Brown, et al. (eds.), Interpreting Goethe’s Faust Today, 17–28.Google Scholar
Traister, Barbara Howard. Heavenly Necromancy: The Magician in English Renaissance Drama. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ure, Peter. “The Evolution of Yeats’s The Countess Cathleen,” Modern Language Review, 57 (1962): 12–24.Google Scholar
Vaget, Hans Rudolf. “The Ethics of Faust’s Last Action.” In Goethe, Faust, ed. Hamlin, 704–14.Google Scholar
Vetterling-Braggin, Mary (ed.). “Femininity,” “Masculinity,” and “Androgyny”: A Modern Philosophical Discussion. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1982.Google Scholar
Ward, Philip. “Introduction” to Frank Wedekind, Franziska, trans. Philip Ward. Adapted by Eleanor Brown. London: Oberon, 1998.Google Scholar
Warren, Michael J. “Doctor Faustus: The Old Man and the Text.” English Literary Renaissance, 11 (1981): 111–47.Google Scholar
Waswo, Richard. “Damnation, Protestant Style: Macbeth, Faustus, and Christian Tragedy.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 4 (1974): 63–99.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Nancy. “Yeats’s Merlin-Faust Design in The Countess Cathleen.” In Spivack, Charlotte (ed.), Merlin Versus Faust: Contending Archetypes in Western Culture, 139–59. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian. Myths of Modern Individualism: Faust, Don Quixote, Don Juan, Robinson Crusoe. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Weiss, Suzanne. “Dr. Faustus – David Mamet.” Culture Vulture, March 3, 2004, http://culturevulture.net/theater/dr-faustus-david-mamet.Google Scholar
West, Robert Hunter. The Invisible World: A Study in Pneumatology in Elizabethan Drama. New York: Octagon, 1969 (1st edn. 1939).Google Scholar
Westlund, Joseph. “The Orthodox Christian Framework of Marlowe’s Faustus.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 3 (1963): 191–205.Google Scholar
Willeke, Audrone B. “Frank Wedekind and the ‘Frauenfrage.’” Monatshefte, 72/1 (1980): 26–38.Google Scholar
Williams, John R. “The Problem of the Mothers.” In Bishop, (ed.), Companion to Goethe’s Faust, 122–43.Google Scholar
Wilmington, Michael. “Svankmajer’s ‘Faust’: A Nightmare Not Easily Forgotten.” Chicago Tribune, February 24, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Eugen. Faust und Luther: Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung der Faustdichtung. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1912.Google Scholar
Yeats, W. B. The Countess Cathleen: Manuscript Materials, ed. Michael, J. Sidnell and Chapman, Wayne K.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Yirinec, Jennifer. “Re-envisioning the Faust Legend: Christopher Marlowe’s The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus and Richard Burton and Nevill Coghill’s Doctor Faustus.” Literature/Film Quarterly, 41 (2013): 67–77.Google Scholar
Young, Andrea Louise. Vision and Audience in Medieval Drama: A Study of the Castle of Perseverance. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar