Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:27:16.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Domestic hierarchy and demographic privilege

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2009

James Z. Lee
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Cameron D. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of California, Pasadena
Get access

Summary

All relations between the family members are regulated in detail by custom. The seniors occupy honorable places and exercise great influence until they fall into senility or complete physical debility. They are always honored by the expression of general attention. They are served at the tables with the best pieces of food, sometimes even separate tables are put up for them and special dishes are prepared.

(Shirokogoroff 1926:98)

In Liaoning the myth of the large peasant household was a reality. The vast majority of the rural population lived in complex households with more than one conjugal family unit.

The hierarchical nature of such households defined the social and economic context of their daily life. Household structure determined the composition of the family work force. Household position determined access to family rights and resources. Household parentage determined the probability of rising to headship in their own right. All decisions from the commonplace—when they could eat, what they could wear—to the extraordinary—who they could marry, when they could have children—had to be negotiated within the household.

And yet with the exception of Arthur Wolfs pioneering analysis of nuptiality and fertility in Taiwan there has been little attempt to differentiate demographic patterns by specific family relationships.

In this chapter we reconstruct such patterns for the 2,000 unique peasant households (10,000 household observations) in our population. The chapter is divided into three sections. In section I, we summarize the formal structure and hierarchy of family relationships and outline the theoretical lines of authority within these multiple-family households.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fate and Fortune in Rural China
Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning 1774–1873
, pp. 133 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×