Book contents
- Families by Agreement
- Families by Agreement
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of Cases and Statutes
- Introduction
- 1 General Considerations
- 2 Marriage
- 3 Agreements within Marriage
- 4 Divorce
- 5 Agreements about Parentage
- 6 Adoption Agreements
- 7 Agreements about Process
- Conclusion
- Bibliography and other Sources
- Index
- References
Bibliography and other Sources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2023
Book contents
- Families by Agreement
- Families by Agreement
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of Cases and Statutes
- Introduction
- 1 General Considerations
- 2 Marriage
- 3 Agreements within Marriage
- 4 Divorce
- 5 Agreements about Parentage
- 6 Adoption Agreements
- 7 Agreements about Process
- Conclusion
- Bibliography and other Sources
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Families by AgreementNavigating Choice, Tradition, and Law, pp. 133 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Bibliography and other Sources
Abraham, Haim (2017), “A Family Is What You Make It? Legal Recognition and Regulation of Multiple Parents,” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, vol. 25, pp. 405–444.Google Scholar
Abramowicz, Sarah (2014), “Contractualizing Custody,” Fordham Law Review, vol. 83, pp. 67–154.Google Scholar
Albert, Ashley & Mulzer, Amy (2022), “Adoption Cannot Be Reformed,” Columbia Journal of Race and Law, vol. 12, pp. 557–600.Google Scholar
Ali, Kecia (2008), “Marriage in Classical Islamic Jurisprudence: A Survey of Doctrines,” in Quraishi, Asifa and Vogel, Frank E. (eds.), The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case Studies in Islamic Family Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 11–45.Google Scholar
Alkhatib, Ihsan Ali (2013), “Shariah Law and American Family Courts: Judicial Inconsistency on the Talaq and Mahr Issues in Wayne County, Michigan,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 14, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
Allen, Adeline A. (2018), “Surrogacy and Limitations to Freedom of Contract: Toward Being More Fully Human,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 41, pp. 753–811.Google Scholar
Aloni, Erez (2016), “The Puzzle of Family Law Pluralism,” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, vol. 39, pp. 317–368.Google Scholar
Altman, Scott (1995), “Lurking in the Shadow,” Southern California Law Review, vol. 68, pp. 493–544.Google Scholar
Altman, Scott (1996), “Divorcing Threats and Offers,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 15, pp. 209–226.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (2008), “American Bar Association Model Act Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology – February 2008,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 171–202.Google Scholar
American Law Institute (2002), Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations (Charlottesville: LexisNexis).Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. (1990), “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 19, pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
Archard, David (1990), “Freedom Not to Be Free: The Case of the Slavery Contract in J. S. Mill’s on Liberty,” Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 40, pp. 453–465.Google Scholar
Atwood, Barbara Ann (1993), “Ten Years Later: Lingering Concerns about the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act,” Journal of Legislation, vol. 19, pp. 127–154.Google Scholar
Atwood, Barbara Ann & Bix, Brian H. (2012), “A New Uniform Law for Premarital and Marital Agreements,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 46, pp. 313–344.Google Scholar
Awad, Abed (2013), “Islamic Family Law in American Courts,” ABA CLE Document, available at www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/international_law/islamic_family_law_in_american_court_8_16_13.authcheckdam.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian & Gertner, Robert (1989), “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 99, pp. 87–130.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynn A. & Emery, Robert (1993), “When Every Relationship Is Above Average: Perceptions and Expectations of Divorce at the Time of Marriage,” Law and Human Behavior, vol. 17, pp. 439–450.Google Scholar
Bani, Lawal Mohammed & Pate, Hamza A. (2015), “Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) under Islamic Law,” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, vol. 42, pp. 138–143.Google Scholar
Beeson, Audrey J. (2018), “Arbitration: A Promising Avenue for Resolving Family Law Cases?,” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, vol. 18, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
Bendall, Charlotte & Harding, Rosie (2018), “Heteronormativity in Dissolution Proceedings,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 134–152.Google Scholar
Bennett, Wendy (2016), “It’s Arbitration, but Not As We Know It: Reflections on Family Law Dispute Resolution,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 30, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (1998), “Bargaining in the Shadow of Love: Premarital Agreements and How We Think about Marriage,” William and Mary Law Review, vol. 40, pp. 145–207.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2004), “The Public and Private Ordering of Marriage,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 2004, pp. 290–311.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2006), “The ALI PRINCIPLES and Agreements: Seeking a Balance between Status and Contract,” in Fretwell Wilson, Robin (ed.), Reconceiving the Family (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 372–391.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2010), “Private Ordering and Family Law,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, vol. 23, pp. 249–285.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2011), “Mahr Agreements: Contracting in the Shadow of Family Law (and Religious Law) – A Comment on Oman’s Article,” Wake Forest Law Review Online, vol. 1, p. 61, http://wakeforestlawreview.com/2011/05/mahr-agreements-contracting-in-the-shadow-of-family-law-and-religious-law-a-comment-on-omans-article/Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2012), Contract Law: Rules, Theory, and Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2013a), “Agreements in Family Law,” International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, vol. 4, pp. 115–131.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2013b), The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2015), “Engagement with Economics: The New Hybrids of Family Law/Law & Economics Thinking,” in Hatzis, Aristides N. and Mercuro, Nicholas (eds.), Law & Economics: Philosophical Issues and Fundamental Questions (London: Routledge), pp. 245–266.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2018a), “Marriage Agreements and Religious Family Law,” in Fretwell Wilson, Robin (ed.), The Contested Place of Religion in Family Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2018b), “Private Ordering in Family Law,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2021), “Family Law: Values beyond Choice and Autonomy?,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 40, pp. 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian H. (2023), “Surrogacy and Contract Law,” in Shakargy, Sharon, Trimmings, Katarina and Achmad, Claire (eds.), Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law (forthcoming, Cheltenham, UK: Elgar Publishing).Google Scholar
Boele-Woelki, Katharina, Miles, Jo & Scherpe, Jens M. (eds.) (2011), The Future of Family Property in Europe (Cambridge: Intersentia).Google Scholar
Boyer, Benjamin F. (1952), “Promissory Estoppel: Principle from Precedents,” Parts I & II, Michigan Law Review, vol. 50, pp. 639–674, 873–898.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth & Ferguson, Lucinda (2018), “Introduction,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Braucher, Jane (2012), “The Sacred and Profane Contracts Machine: The Complex Morality of Contract Law in Action,” Suffolk University Law Review, vol. 45, pp. 667–693.Google Scholar
Bridges, Khiara M. (2014), “Windsor, Surrogacy, and Race,” Washington Law Review, vol. 89, pp. 1125–1154.Google Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. (2002), “Empirical Work in Family Law,” University of Illinois Law Review, vol. 2002, pp. 1083–1110.Google Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. (2008), “Are All Contracts Alike?,” Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 43, pp. 533–557.Google Scholar
Brod, Gail Frommer (1994), “Premarital Agreements and Gender Justice,” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, vol. 6, pp. 229–295.Google Scholar
Broyde, Michael J. (2015), “Faith-Based Private Arbitration as a Model for Preserving Rights and Values in a Pluralistic Society,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 90, pp. 111–140.Google Scholar
Broyde, Michael J. (2017), Sharia Tribunals, Rabbinical Courts, and Christian Panels: Religious Arbitration in America and the West (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bryan, Penelope Eileen (1997), “The Coercion of Women in Divorce Settlement Negotiations,” Denver University Law Review, vol. 74, pp. 931–940.Google Scholar
Bryan, Penelope Eileen (1999), “Women’s Freedom to Contract at Divorce: A Mask for Contextual Coercion,” Buffalo Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 1153–1274.Google Scholar
Buckley, F. H. & Ribstein, Larry E. (2001), “Calling a Truce in the Marriage Wars,” University of Illinois Law Review, vol. 2001, pp. 561–610.Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi & Carbone, June (2010), Red Families v. Blue Families (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi & Carbone, June (2019), “Blackstonian Marriage, Gender, and Cohabitation,” Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 59, pp. 1247–1283.Google Scholar
Cane, Peter & Kritzer, Herbert M. (eds.) (2010), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Carbone, June (2020), “A Consumer Guide to Empirical Family Law,” Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 95, pp. 1593–1628.Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Cahn, Naomi (2011), “Marriage Parentage, and Child Support,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 219–240.Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Cahn, Naomi (2013), “The Triple System of Family Law,” Michigan State Law Review, vol. 2013, pp. 1185–1229.Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Madeira, Jody Lyneé (2015), “The Role of Agency: Compensated Surrogacy and the Institutionalization of Assisted Reproductive Practices,” Washington Law Review Online, vol. 90, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Carbone, June & Miller, Christina O. (2018), “Surrogacy Professionalism,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, vol. 31, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Benjamin (2023), “Sperm Is Still Cheap: Reconsidering the Law’s Male Centric Approach to Embryo Disputes after Thirty Years of Jurisprudence,” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, vol. 34, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
Carter, Elizabeth Ruth (2016), “Rethinking Premarital Agreements: A Collaborative Approach,” New Mexico Law Review, vol. 46, pp. 354–382.Google Scholar
Carter, Elizabeth Ruth (2019), “Are Premarital Agreements Really Unfair: An Empirical Study,” Hofstra Law Review, vol. 48, pp. 387–430.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne (1993), “Couples and Coupling in the Public Sphere: A Comment on the Legal History of Litigating for Lesbian and Gay Rights,” 79 Virginia Law Review, vol. 79, pp. 1643–1694.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne (2005), “Marriage Licenses,” Minnesota Law Review, vol. 89, pp. 1758–1789.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne (2011), “Enforcing Bargains in an Ongoing Marriage,” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, vol. 35, pp. 225–260.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019), 2019 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fertility Clinic and National Summary Report, www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2019/fertility-clinic.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Clare (2016), “The Limitations of Contract: Regulating Personal Relationships in a Marriage-Free State,” in Brake, Elizabeth (ed.), After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 51–83.Google Scholar
Clark, Homer H., Jr. & Katz, Sandford N. (2021), The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States, 3rd ed. (St. Paul: West Publishing).Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Glenn & Adashi, Eli Y. (2016), “Embryo Disposition Disputes: Controversies and Case Law,” Hastings Center Report, vol. 46(5), pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
Cossman, Brenda (1990), “A Matter of Difference: Domestic Contracts and Gender Equality,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 28, pp. 303–380.Google Scholar
Cramer, Maria (2021), “Couple Forced to Adopt Their Own Children after a Surrogate Pregnancy,” New York Times, January 31, 2021.Google Scholar
Crosby, Courtney (2020), “Keeping Up with Gestational Carrier Agreements: Considerations Regarding the Regulation of Surrogacy,” Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 17, pp. 357–401.Google Scholar
Curry, Amberlynn (2010), Comment, “The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and Its Variations Throughout the States,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, vol. 23, pp. 355–383.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch & Heller, Michael (2017), The Choice Theory of Contracts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian & Twining, William (eds.) (2015), Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).Google Scholar
Dnes, Antony W. (2000), “Marriage Contracts,” in Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Online) (2000), https://reference.findlaw.com/lawandeconomics/5810-marriage-contracts.pdfGoogle Scholar
Donahue, Charles, Jr. (2007), Law, Marriage and Society in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles, Jr. (2008), “The Western Canon Law of Marriage: A Doctrinal Introduction,” in Quraishi, Asifa and Vogel, Frank E. (eds.), The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case Studies in Islamic Family Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
Dubler, Ariela R. (1998), “Governing through Contract: Common Law Marriage in the Nineteenth Century,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 107, pp. 1885–1920.Google Scholar
Dubler, Ariela R. (2000), “Wifely Behavior: A Legal History of Acting Married,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 100, pp. 957–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekelaar, John (2018), “Family Law and Legal Theory,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Eichner, Maxine (2010), “Beyond Private Ordering: Families and the Supportive State,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Law, vol. 23, pp. 305–347.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Melvin Aron (1995), “The Limits of Cognition and the Limits of Contract,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 211–259.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991), Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha (2015a), Love’s Promises: How Formal & Informal Contracts Shape All Kinds of Families (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha (2015b), “Marital Contracting in a Post-Windsor World,” Florida State University Law Review, vol. 42, pp. 479–519.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N., Jr. (2012), “Family Law Pluralism: The Guided-Choice Regime of Menus, Default Rules, and Override Rules,” Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 100, pp. 1881–1987.Google Scholar
Family Law Quarterly (2022), “The Year 2021 in Review: Charts 2021: Family Law in the Fifty States, D.C., and Puerto Rico,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 55, pp. 513–621.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Lucinda (2014), “Arbitral Awards: A Magnetic Factor of Determinative Importance – Yet Not to Be Rubber-Stamped?,” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 37, pp. 99–101.Google Scholar
Feuerherd, Peter (2019), “Why Covenant Marriage Failed to Take Off,” JSTOR Daily, February 11, 2019, https://daily.jstor.org/why-covenant-marriage-failed-to-take-off/Google Scholar
Field, Martha A. (1991), “Surrogacy Contracts: Gestational and Traditional: The Argument for Nonenforcement,” Washburn Law Review, vol. 31, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson (1998), “Contract, Marriage and Background Rules,” in Bix, Brian (ed.), Analyzing Law: New Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 183–195.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine (2015), Wedlocked: The Perils of Marriage Equality (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (2005), A History of American Law, 3rd ed. (New York: Touchstone Books).Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha (2005), “Is Consent Necessary? An Evaluation of the Emerging Law of Cohabitant Obligation,” UCLA Law Review, vol. 52, pp. 815–897.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office, Office of General Counsel (1997), Letter to The Honorable Henry J. Hyde, Jan. 31, 1997, available at www.gao.gov/archive/1997/og97016.pdf?_ga=2.71193746.343089481.1527351857-1557076139.1527351857Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent (1998), “Religious Law and Civil Law: Using Secular Law to Assure Observance of Practices with Religious Significance,” Southern California Law Review, vol. 71, pp. 781–843.Google Scholar
Gurrentz, Benjamin (2019), “Cohabiting Partners Older, More Racially Diverse, More Educated, Higher Earners,” www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/09/unmarried-partners-more-diverse-than-20-years-ago.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hadley, Edwin W. (1927), “Breach of Promise to Marry,” The Notre Dame Lawyer, vol. 2, pp. 190–195.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet E. (2010), “Behind the Law of Marriage (I): From Status/Contract to the Marriage System,” Unbound, vol. 6, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet E. (2011a), “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part I,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, vol. 23, pp. 1–109.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet E. (2011b), “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part II,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, vol. 23, pp. 189–293.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (2000), Man & Wife in America: A History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (1998), “Federalism and the Family Reconstructed,” UCLA Law Review, vol. 45, pp. 1297–1400.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (2000), “Contest and Consent: A Legal History of Marital Rape,” California Law Review, vol. 88, pp. 1373–1505.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (2002), “Parenthood Divided: A Legal History of the Bifurcated Law of Parental Relations,” Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 90, pp. 299–386.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (2004), “The Canon of Family Law,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 57, pp. 825–900.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (2005), “Intimacy and Economic Exchange,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 119, pp. 491–530.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine (2014), Family Law Reimagined (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Healy, Kieran & Krawiec, Kimberly D. (2017), “Understanding Moral Repugnance in Markets,” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, vol. 107(5), pp. 86–90.Google Scholar
Helfand, Michael A. (2015), “Arbitration’s Counter-Narrative: The Religious Arbitration Paradigm,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 124, pp. 2994–3051.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen (2008), Kinship by Design: A History of Adoption in the Modern United States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
vol. 74, pp. 365–413.Google Scholar
Hinson, Diane S. & McBrien, Maureen (2011), “Surrogacy across America,” Family Advocate, vol. 34(2), pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Laurence D. (2017), Philosophy, Law and the Family: A New Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).Google Scholar
Huntington, Clare (2018), “The Empirical Turn in Family Law,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 188, pp. 227–311.Google Scholar
Huntington, Clare (2022), “The Institutions of Family Law,” Boston University Law Review, vol. 102, pp. 393–448.Google Scholar
Hyman, David A. (1998), “Lies, Damned Lies, and Narrative,” Indiana Law Journal, vol. 73, pp. 797–866.Google Scholar
Irish Government (1995), Information Booklet, Divorce Referendum, available at https://irishelectionliterature.com/2013/05/01/the-government-information-booklet-from-the-1995-divorce-referendum/#more-25340Google Scholar
Jennings-Lax, Leslie I. & Truax, Louise (2016), “Co-Parenting Agreements between Unmarried Cohabitants,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 50, pp. 349–361.Google Scholar
Johnson, Alex M., Jr. (2013), “The Legality of Contracts Governing the Disposition of Embryos: Unenforceable Intra-family Agreements,” Southwestern Law Review, vol. 43, pp. 191–252.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. (2018), “De Facto Parentage and the Modern Family,” Family Advocate, vol. 40, pp. 31–35.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. (2019), “Autonomy and the Family,” UCLA Law Review, vol. 66, pp. 912–987.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. (2020), “Family Choices,” Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 51, pp. 1285–1316.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. (2021), “(Not) Just Surrogacy,” California Law Review, vol. 109, pp. 401–492.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. & NeJaime, Douglas (2023), “How Parenthood Functions,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 123, pp. 319–433.Google Scholar
Kabátek, Jan (2019), “Divorced in a Flash: The Effect of the Administrative Divorce Option on Marital Stability in the Netherlands,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3390137Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (2010), “Savigny’s Family/Patrimony Distinction and Its Place in the Global Genealogy of Classical Legal Thought,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 58, pp. 811–841.Google Scholar
Kennett, Wendy (2016), “It’s Arbitration, but Not As We Know It: Reflections on Family Law Dispute Resolution,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 30, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Khazan, Olga (2021), “The New Question Haunting Adoption,” The Atlantic, October 19, 2021.Google Scholar
Kim, Nancy S. (2013), Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kingsley, Robert (1959), “Duress as a Ground for Annulment of Marriage,” Southern California Law Review, vol. 33, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Knaub, Kelly (2016), “Egg Donors Get Pay Limits Axed with Antitrust Settlement,” Law360, February 1, 2016, www.law360.com/articles/753389/egg-donors-get-pay-limits-axed-with-antitrust-settlementGoogle Scholar
Krawiec, Kimberly D. (2022), “Markets, Repugnance, and Externalities,” Journal of Institutional Economics, forthcoming, doi:10.1017/S1744137422000157.Google Scholar
Law Commission, The (2014), Matrimonial Property, Needs, and Agreements, 26 February 2014 (London: The Stationary Office).Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert (2018), “Cohabitants, Choice, and the Public Interest,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 115–133.Google Scholar
Leeson, Peter T. & Pierson, Joshua (2016), “Prenups,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 47, pp. 367–400.Google Scholar
Lewis, Browne (2016), “‘You Belong to Me’: Unscrambling the Legal Ramifications of Recognizing a Property Right in Frozen Human Eggs,” Tennessee Law Review, vol. 88, pp. 645–687.Google Scholar
Lindsley, William (2022), Corpus Juris Secundum Marriage § 51: “Invalid, Voidable, and Void Marriages Distinguished, Generally” (October 2022 Update).Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1963), “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” American Sociology Review, vol. 28, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1991), “Reflections on Sex Equality under Law,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 100, pp. 1281–1328.Google Scholar
Manning, Wendy J. & Smock, Pamela J. (2005), “Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives from Qualitative Data,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 67, pp. 989–1002.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa V. (2018), “Restraining Forced Marriage,” Nevada Law Journal, vol. 18, pp. 919–1003.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Kaiponanea (2018), “Consent to Intimate Regulation,” North Carolina Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 1013–1083.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Nancy G. (1992), “The Feminist Dilemma in Mediation,” International Review of Comparative Public Policy, vol. 4, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
May, Kelsey M. (2009), “Bachelors Beware: The Current Validity and Future Feasibility of a Cause of Action for Breach of Promise to Marry,” Tulsa Law Review, vol. 45, pp. 331–358.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Brett H. (2007), “Sticky Defaults and Altering Rules in Corporate Law,” S.M.U. Law Review, vol. 60, pp. 383–439.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry & Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio (2018), The Civil Law Tradition, 4th ed. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno (2016), Political Economy for Public Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1974), On Liberty Himmelfarb, (Gertrude, ed.) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. (1985) “Divorce Bargaining: The Limits on Private Ordering,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, vol. 18, pp. 1015–1038.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. & Kornhauser, Lewis (1979), “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 88, pp. 950–997.Google Scholar
Morgan, Laura W. (2017), “A Nationwide Review of Alimony Legislation, 2007–2016,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 51, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2014), “Uniform Collaborative Law Rules and Uniform Collaborative Law Act,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 55–177.Google Scholar
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017), “Uniform Parentage Act,” available at www.uniformlaws.org/homeGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures (2020), “Common Law Marriage by State,” available at www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/common-law-marriage.aspxGoogle Scholar
National Healthy Marriage Resource Center (2017), “Covenant Marriage: A Fact Sheet,” available at www.healthymarriageinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Covenant-Marriage-A-Fact.pdfGoogle Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas, Siegel, Reva & Barak-Erez, Daphne (2020), “Surrogacy, Autonomy, and Equality,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3732265Google Scholar
Nicolas, Peter (2014), “Straddling the Columbia: A Constitutional Law Professor’s Musings on Circumventing Washington State’s Criminal Prohibition on Compensated Surrogacy,” Washington Law Review, vol. 89, pp. 1235–1309.Google Scholar
Niechciał, Paulina (2009), “Shi’i Institution of Temporary Marriage in Tehran: State Ideology and Practice,” Anthropos, vol. 104(1), pp. 172–179.Google Scholar
Note (2022), “Three’s Company, Too: The Emergence of Polyamorous Partnership Ordinances,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 135, pp. 1441–1463.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances E. (1985) “The Myth of State Intervention in the Family,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, vol. 18, pp. 835–864.Google Scholar
PBS News Hour (2016), “Uncovering the Problem of Forced Marriage in the U.S.,” September 14, 2016, available at www.pbs.org/newshour/show/uncovering-problem-forced-marriage-u-sGoogle Scholar
Papke, David Ray (1999), “Pondering Past Purposes: A Critical History of American Adoption Law,” West Virginia Law Review, vol. 102, pp. 459–476.Google Scholar
Parisi, Francesco (2013), The Language of Law and Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Parness, Jeffrey A. (2022), “DIY Artificial Insemination: The Not-So-Great Gatsby,” Creighton Law Review, vol. 55, pp. 465–497.Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, Brienna & Sánchez Gassen, Nora (2012), “How Similar Are Cohabitation and Marriage? Legal Approaches to Cohabitation across Western Europe,” Population and Development Review, vol. 38, pp. 435–467.Google Scholar
Pietrzak, Anetta (2012), “The Price of Sperm: An Economic Analysis of the Current Regulations Surrounding the Gamete Donation Industry,” Journal of Law & Family Studies, vol. 14, pp. 121–136.Google Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe & Balmer, Nigel J. (2012), “Ignorance in Bliss: Modeling Knowledge of Rights in Marriage and Cohabitation,” Law & Society Review, vol. 46, pp. 297–334.Google Scholar
Pollak, Robert A. (2011), “Comment on Mary Anne Case’s Enforcing Bargains in an Ongoing Marriage,” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, vol. 35, pp. 261–272.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca (2008), “Common-Law Marriage: Myths and Misunderstandings,” Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 20, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca (2009), “Common Misunderstandings,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 43, pp. 587–597.Google Scholar
Quraishi, Asifa & Vogel, Frank E. (eds.), (2008), The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case Studies in Islamic Family Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quraishi-Landes, Asifa (2013), “A Meditation on Mahr, Modernity, and Muslim Marriage Contract Law,” in Failinger, Marie A., Schiltz, Elizabeth R. and Stabile, Susan J. (eds.), Feminism, Law, and Religion (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 173–195.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin (2013), The Political Economy of Human Happiness: How Voters’ Choices Determine the Quality of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane (1996), Contested Commodities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane (2012), Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane (2017), “From Babyselling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 54(2), pp. 339–376.Google Scholar
Ravdin, Linda J. (2011), Premarital Agreements: Drafting and Negotiation (Chicago: American Bar Association).Google Scholar
Ravdin, Linda J. (2014), “Premarital Agreements and the Migratory Same-Sex Couple,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 397–434.Google Scholar
Ravdin, Linda J. (2018), “Postmarital Agreements: Validity and Enforceability,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 52, pp. 245–276.Google Scholar
Rebouché, Rachel (2017), “A Case against Collaboration,” Maryland Law Review, vol 76, pp. 547–593.Google Scholar
Rebouché, Rachel (2020) “Contracting Pregnancy,” Iowa Law Review, vol. 105, pp. 1591–1641.Google Scholar
Rebouché, Rachel (2023), “Bargaining about Birth,” Washington University Law Review, vol. 100, forthcoming, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4074053Google Scholar
Report of a Group Appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury in January 1964 (1966), Putting Asunder: A Divorce Law for Contemporary Society (London: S.P.C.K.).Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith (2011), “Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. Concepcion, Wal-Mart v. Dukes and Turner v. Rogers,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 125, pp. 78–170.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith (2015), “Diffusing Disputes: The Public in the Private of Arbitration, the Private in Courts, and the Erasure of Rights,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 124, pp. 2808–2943.Google Scholar
Reuters (2011), “’Til 2013 Do Us Part? Mexico Mulls 2-Year Marriage,” www.reuters.com, September 29, 2011.Google Scholar
Ribstein, Larry E. (2005), “A Standard Form Approach to Same-Sex Marriage,” Creighton Law Review, vol. 38, pp. 309–335.Google Scholar
Richtel, Matt (2012), “Till Death, or 20 Years, Do Us Part,” New York Times, September 28, 2012.Google Scholar
Rivlin, Ram (2017), “The Puzzle of Intra-Familial Commodification,” University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 67, pp. 68–95.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy E. (2017), “Why Baby Markets Aren’t Free,” UC Irvine Law Review, vol. 7, pp. 611–621.Google Scholar
Ronken, Oscar C. (1914), “Ante-Nuptial Contracts; Their Origin and Nature,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 24, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
Rosman, Elisa A. (ed.) (2011), Adoption Factbook V (Washington, D.C.: National Concept for Adoption).Google Scholar
Ryznar, Margaret & Stepien´-Sporek, Anna (2009), “To Have and to Hold, for Richer or Richer: Premarital Agreements in the Comparative Context,” Chapman Law Review, vol. 13, pp. 27–62.Google Scholar
Sabatello, Maya (2015), “Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications,” Laws, vol. 4, pp. 352–376.Google Scholar
Salava, Luke (2014), “Collaborative Divorce: The Unexpectedly Underwhelming Advance of a Promising Solution in Marriage Dissolution,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 179–196.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol (2006), “A Case for Civil Marriage,” Cardozo Law Review, vol. 27, pp. 1311–1324.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol (2013), “Acquiring Children Contractually: Relational Contracts at Work at Home,” in Braucher, Jean, Kidwell, John and Whitford, William C. (eds.), Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay: On the Empirical and the Lyrical (Oxford: Hart Publishing), pp. 289–314.Google Scholar
Sassler, Sharon & Miller, Amanda Jayne (2017), Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Scherpe, Jens M. (2012), Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Scheunchen, Tobias (2021), “Lost in Translation? Mahr-Agreements, US Courts, and the Predicament of Muslim Women,” Journal of Islamic Law, vol. 2, pp. 33–108.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Tim (2021), “Divorce 2021: Assets, Earnings … But Who Gets the Embryos?,” Family Advocate, vol. 43, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan (1992), “Relational Contracts in the Courts: An Analysis of Incomplete Agreements and Judicial Strategies,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 21, pp. 271–318.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry (2004), The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (New York: Harper & Collins).Google Scholar
Scott, Elizabeth S. (2006), “Domestic Partnerships, Implied Contracts, and Law Reform,” in Fretwell Wilson, Robin (ed.), Reconceiving the Family: Critique on the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 331–349.Google Scholar
Scott, Elizabeth S. & Scott, Robert E. (1999), “A Contract Theory of Marriage,” in Buckley, F. H. (ed.), The Fall and Rise of Freedom of Contract (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 201–244.Google Scholar
Selfridge, Alexandra (2007), “Challenges for Negotiating and Drafting an Antenuptial Agreement for the Religious Upbringing of Future Children,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, vol. 16, pp. 91–97.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet (2008), “Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, vol. 9, pp. 573–607.Google Scholar
Shakargy, Sharon (2020), “Choice of Law for Surrogacy Arrangements: In the In-Between of Status and Contract,” Journal of Private International Law, vol. 16, pp. 138–162.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon (2018), “Surrogacy: Reconceptualizing Family Relationships in an Age of Reproductive Technologies,” in Brake, Elizabeth and Ferguson, Lucinda (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 293–312.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Eliza (2022), “Why Some Hasidic Children Can’t Leave Failing Schools,” New York Times, December 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie Maguire (1982), “Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy,” California Law Review, vol. 70, pp. 204–334.Google Scholar
Siegel, Beverly (2015), “Sign on the Dotted Line,” Tablet, tabletmag.com, March 6, 2015.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. (1996), “‘The Rule of Love’: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 105, pp. 2117–2207.Google Scholar
Silbaugh, Katharine B. (1997), “Commodification and Women’s Household Labor,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, vol. 9, pp. 81–121.Google Scholar
Silbaugh, Katharine B. (1998), “Marriage Contracts and the Family Economy,” Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 93, pp. 65–143.Google Scholar
Singer, Jana (1992), “The Privatization of Family Law,” Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 1992, pp. 1443–1568.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. (2010), “Religion, Divorce, and the Missing Culture War in America,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 125, pp. 57–85.Google Scholar
Smits, Jan M. (2016), “Till Death Us Do Part? On Lifelong and Fixed-Term Marriage,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2882121Google Scholar
Snyder, Steven H. & Byrn, Mary Patricia (2005), “The Use of Prebirth Parentage Orders in Surrogacy Proceedings,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 39, pp. 633–662.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Emily J. (2018), “The New Family Freedom,” Boston College Law Review, vol. 59, pp. 1983–2053.Google Scholar
Stone, Suzanne Last (2008), “Jewish Marriage and Divorce Law,” in Quraishi, Asifa and Vogel, Frank E. (eds.), The Islamic Marriage Contract: Case Studies in Islamic Family Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
Stoner, Katherine E. (2014), Divorce without Court, 3rd ed. (Berkeley, CA: Nolo Press).Google Scholar
Strauber, Jocelyn (1998), “A Deal Is a Deal: Antenuptial Agreements Regarding Religious Upbringing of Children Should Be Enforceable,” Duke Law Journal, vol. 47, pp. 971–1012.Google Scholar
Strauss, Gregg (2019), “What Role Remains for De Facto Parenthood,” Florida State University Law Review, vol. 46, pp. 909–978.Google Scholar
Strauss, Gregg (2022), “Parentage Agreements Are Not Contracts,” Fordham Law Review, vol. 90, pp. 2645–2672.Google Scholar
Subramanian, Guhan (2019), “What Is BATNA? How to Find Your Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement,” Harvard Law School Program on Negotiation, Daily Blog, May 7, 2019. www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/batna/translate-your-batna-to-the-current-deal/Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996), “On the Expressive Function of Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 144, pp. 2021–2053.Google Scholar
Swenner, Frederik (ed.) (2015), Contractualisation of Family Law – Global Perspectives (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus (1964–1965), “California’s Dual System of Family Law: Its Origin, Development, and Present Status,” [Part I], Stanford Law Review, vol. 16, pp. 257–317 [Part II], Stanford Law Review, vol. 16, pp. 900–981; [Part III], Stanford Law Review, vol. 17, pp. 614–682.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. (2015), Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics (New York: W.W. Norton & Company).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sharon (2015), Prenuptial Agreements and the Presumption of Free Choice (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sharon (2018), “Feminist Relational Contract Theory: A New Model for Family Property Agreements,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 45, pp. 617–645.Google Scholar
Tindall, Harry L. & Wood, Elizabeth G. (2014), “Uniform Collaborative Law Act – An Introduction,” Family Law Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 53–54.Google Scholar
Tollestrup, Jessica (2019), Child Support Enforcement: Program Basics (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service).Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. & Elliott, Steven (2001), “The Scope and Limits of Legal Paternalism,” in Benson, Peter (ed.), The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 45–85.Google Scholar
Tucker, Lisa A. (2020), “From Contract Rights to Contact Rights: Rethinking the Paradigm for Post-Adoption Contact Agreements,” Boston University Law Review, vol. 100, pp. 2317–2366.Google Scholar
Tucker, Lisa A. (2022), “The Myth of Open Adoption,” National Law Journal, Law.com, August 16, 2022.Google Scholar
Tugend, Alina (2010), “Too Many Choices: A Problem That Can Paralyze,” New York Times, February 26, 2010.Google Scholar
Turner, Brett R. and Morgan, Laura W. (2012), Attacking and Defending Marital Agreements (Chicago: American Bar Association).Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission (2010), “Uniform Collaborative Law Rules and Uniform Collaborative Law Act.”Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission (2018), “Legislative Fact Sheet – Collaborative Law Act.” www.uniformlaws.org/LegislativeFactSheet.aspx?title=Collaborative%20Law%20ActGoogle Scholar
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (2018), “Forced Marriage,” available at www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/forced-marriage.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families (2019), “Postadoption Contract Agreements between Birth and Adoptive Families,” available at www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/laws-policies/statutes/cooperative/.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Children’s Bureau (2017), “Regulation of Private Domestic Adoption Expenses,” available at www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/expenses.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, James A. (1958), “Antenuptial Conveyance or Agreement Intended to Defeat Right of Election,” St. John’s Law Review, vol. 32, pp. 174–182.Google Scholar
Warner, Alexis (2017), “Collaborative Divorce as an Alternative to Traditional Adversarial Divorce or Other Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution,” Drake Law Review Discourse, September 2017, pp. 101–121.Google Scholar
Wax, Amy L. (1998), “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market: Is There a Future for Egalitarian Marriage?,” Virginia Law Review, vol. 84, pp. 509–672.Google Scholar
Weiss, Martin & Abramoff, Robert (1992), “The Enforceability of Religious Upbringing Agreements,” John Marshall Law Review, vol. 25, pp. 655–725.Google Scholar
West, Melanie Grayce (2016), “For Orthodox Jews, a Different Kind of Prenup,” Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Williams, Sean Hannon (2007), “Postnuptial Agreements,” Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 2007, pp. 827–887.Google Scholar
Younger, Judith T. (2007), “Lovers’ Contracts in the Courts: Forsaking the Minimal Decencies,” William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, vol. 13, pp. 349–428.Google Scholar
Zalesne, Deborah (2015), “The Contractual Family: The Role of the Market in Shaping Family Formations and Rights,” Cardozo Law Review, vol. 36, pp. 1027–1097.Google Scholar
Zalesne, Deborah (2017), “The Intersection of Contract Law, Reproductive Technology, and the Market: Families in the Age of ART,” University of Richmond Law Review, vol. 51, pp. 419–497.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Edward A. (2006), “Deregulating Marriage: The Pro-Marriage Case for Abolishing Civil Marriage,” Cardozo Law Review, vol. 27, pp. 1161–1220.Google Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt (2018), “Exploitation and Consent,” in Müller, Andreas and Schaber, Peter (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent (London: Routledge), pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt, Ferguson, Benjamin & Wertheimer, Alan (2022), “Exploitation,” in Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/.Google Scholar