References

Robert D. van Valin, Jr.

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610578.010

Abdoulaye, M. L. 1992. Aspects of Hausa morphosyntax in Role and Reference Grammar. preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68:43–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Steven R., and Kiparsky, Paul, eds. 1973. A festschrift for Moris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 1982. The representation of case in modern Icelandic. In Bresnan, ed., 427–503

Andrews, Avery 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Shopen, ed., 62–154

Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui, Andrey Li. 1993. The syntax of scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Asher, Nicholas. 1999. Discourse and the focus/background distinction. In Bosch, P. and Sandt, R., eds., Focus: linguistic, cognitive and computational perspectives, 247–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6:353–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Bearth, Thomas. 1969. Phrase et discours en Toura. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 25:29–45Google Scholar

Bearth, Thomas 1992. Constituent structure, natural focus hierarchy and focus types in Toura. Folia Linguistica 26:75–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Belloro, Valeria. 2004. A Role and Reference Grammar account of third-person clitic clusters in Spanish. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Bentley, Delia. 2004. Ne-cliticisation and split intransitivity. Journal of Linguistics 40:219–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. 1991. Grammatical relations: the evidence against their necessity and universality. London and New York: RoutledgeCrossRef Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 1993. Belhare subordination and the theory of topic. In K. Ebert, ed., Studies in clause linkage (Papers from the First Köln–Zürich Workshop), 23–55. Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, no. 12. Zurich: University of Zürich

Bickel, Balthasar 2002. Belhare. In , R. LaPolla and , G. Thurgood, eds., The Sino-Tibetan languages, 546–70. London: Curzon PressGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar 2003a. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79:708–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar 2003b. Clause linkage typology. Lecture series delivered at the 2003 International Role and Reference Grammar Conference, UNESP, São Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil

Blake, B. J. 1979. A Kalkatungu grammar, Pacific Linguistics B:57. Canberra: Pacific LinguisticsGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: HoltGoogle Scholar

Borkin, Ann. 1984. Problems in form and function. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar

Branigan, Holly, and Mercè Prat-Sala. 2000. A cross-linguistic perspective on discourse context and syntactic processing in language production. In DeVincenzi and Lombardo, eds., 205–26

Bresnan, Joan. 1982a. Control and complementation. In Bresnan, ed., 282–390

Bresnan, Joan ed. 1982b. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Jonni, M. Kanerva. 1989. Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 1:1–50Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher. 2003. Structure and function: a guide to three major structural-functional theories (2 vols.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Butler, Christopher 2004. Notes towards an incremental implementation of the Role and Reference Grammar semantics-to-syntax mapping rules for English. To appear in , M. Hannay and , G. Steen (eds.), The English clause: usage and structure. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Butler, James, and Peck, Charles. 1980. The use of passive, antipassive, and absolutive verbs in Tzutujil of San Pedro la Laguna. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2. 1:40–52Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, and James Gair. 2000. Dhivehi (Maldivian), Languages of the World / Materials 63. Munich: Lincom Europa

Carlson, Greg N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts

Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: a generative introduction. Cambridge, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Cattell, Ray. 1984. Composite predicates in English. Orlando, FL: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Centineo, Giulia. 1986. A lexical theory of auxiliary selection in Italian. In Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 1:1–35. Published in Probus 8:223–71, 1996

Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In , R. Tomlin, ed., Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick, Jacobs & Peter, Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn & CoGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Anderson and Kiparsky, eds., 232–86

Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Clark, Robin. 1985. The syntactic nature of logical form: evidence from Toba Batak. Linguistic Inquiry 16:663–9Google Scholar

Cole, Peter, ed. 1981. Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In , M. Shibatani, ed., The grammar of causative constructions, 261–312. (Syntax and semantics, 6). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1988. Conjunction reduction in pro-drop languages: some Slavic evidence. In Bierwisch, M.et al., eds., Syntax, Semantic und Lexikon, 83–7. Studia Grammatica, 29. Berlin: Akademie-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, and Sandra Thompson. 1985. Complex nominalizations. In Shopen, Timothy, ed., Language typology and linguistic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 349–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Craig, Colette. 1977. The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Cutrer, Michelle. 1987. Theories of obligatory control. In Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 2:6–37. Davis: University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Cutrer, Michelle 1993. Semantic and syntactic factors in control. In Van Valin, ed., 167–95

Dahm-Draksic, Tracy. 1997. A Role and Reference Grammar analysis of case marking in Croatian. University at Buffalo MA Project. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Datz, Margaret. 1980. Jacaltec syntactic structures and the demands of discourse. preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University of Colorado

DeClerck, R. 1988. Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudoclefts. Dordrecht: ForisCrossRef Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine. 1989. Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language 65:56–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine 1990. Subject, topic and Sesotho passive. Journal of Child Language 17:67–84CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Derbyshire, Desmond, and Geoffrey, Pullum, eds. 1986. Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. I. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterCrossRef Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond, and Geoffrey, Pullum 1989. Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. II. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Vincenzi, Marica, and Vincenzo, Lombardo, eds. 2000. Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar, part 1. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of north Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62:808–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 1:81–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26:475–523CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In , J. Bybee, , J. Haiman and , S. Thompson, eds., Essays on language function and language type, 115–43. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1985. A grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1987. Grammatical relations in Acehnese. Studies in Language 11:365–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Durie, Mark. 1988. The so-called passive of Acehnese. Language 64:104–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Erguvanlı, Eser. 1984. The function of word order in Turkish grammar, University of California Publications in Linguistics, 106. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, MIT

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, and Lappin, Shalom. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6:41–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, and Lappin, Shalom 1983. Under stress: a functional explanation of sentence stress. Journal of Linguistics 19:419–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Eschenberg, Ardis. 1999. Focus structure in Polish. Unpublished MA Project, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Pirahã. In Derbyshire and Pullum, eds. (1986), 200–325

Everett, Daniel L. 2002. Asymmetrical clause linkage in Wari'. Unpublished ms., University of Manchester. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Everett, Daniel L., and Kern, Barbara. 1998. Wari': the Pacaas-Novos language of western Brazil. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Faltz, Leonard. 1978. On indirect objects in universal grammar. CLS 14:76–87Google Scholar

Félix Armendáriz, Rolando. 2000. Las relaciones gramaticales en yaqui: un análisis en el marco de la Gramática de Rol y Referencia. MA thesis, University of Sonora

Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In , E. Bach and , R. Harms, eds., Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonGoogle Scholar

Foley, William A., and Robert, D. Van Valin Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Foley, William A., and Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1985. ‘Information packaging in the clause’. In Shopen, ed., 282–364

Frajzynger, Zygmunt. 1995. A functional theory of matrix coding. Paper presented at the Conference on Functional Approaches to Grammar, Albuquerque, noun marker

Franklin, Karl. 1971. A grammar of Kewa, New Guinea, Pacific Linguistics, C-16. Canberra: Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar

Fretheim, Thorstein, and Gundel, Jeanette, eds. 1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Fried, Robert. 2003. Iconicity: some thoughts on peripheral subordination and complement clauses in English. Unpublished ms., University at Buffalo

Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4:333–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy 1981. Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5. 2:163–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In , T. Givón, ed., Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

González Orta, Marta María. 2002. Lexical templates and syntactic variation: the syntax–semantics interface of the Old English speech verb secgan. In Mairal and Pérez Quintero, eds., 281–302

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In , P. Cole and , J. Morgan, eds., Speech acts, 41–58. Syntax and semantics, 3. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián G. 2004. The syntax–semantics interface in Yaqui complex sentences: a Role and Reference Grammar analysis. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo. (Available on the Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián, and Robert, D. Van Valin Jr. 2004. Yaqui and the analysis of primary object languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 70:290–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K. 1988. Universals of topic–comment structure. In , M. Hammond, , E. Moravcsik and , J. Wirth, eds., Studies in linguistic typology, 209–39. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, and Ron, Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69. 2:274–307CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1973. Person marking in Warlbiri. In Anderson and Kiparsky, eds., 308–44

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3:37–81, 199–244CrossRef Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Han, Jeonghan. 1999. On grammatical coding of information structure in Korean: a Role and Reference Grammar account. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Hansell, Mark. 1993. Serial verbs and complement constructions in Mandarin: a clause linkage analysis. In Van Valin, ed., 197–233

Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996. A study of Japanese clause linkage: the connective TE in Japanese. Stanford: CSLIGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of the inchoative/causative verb alternation. In , B. Comrie and , M. Polinsky, eds., Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin 1999. Explaining article–possessor complementarity: economic motivation in noun phrase syntax. Language 75:227–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Haumann, Dagmar. 1997. The syntax of subordination. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagCrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1975. Some functional relationships in grammar. Language 51:89–104CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey 1977. Choctaw cases. BLS 3:204–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Heusinger, Klaus von. 1999. Intonation and information structure. Habilitationschrift, University of Konstanz

Heydel, Maren, and Wayne Murray. 2000. Conceptual effects in sentence priming: a cross-linguistic perspective. In De Vincenzi and Lombardo, eds., 227–54

Hoijer, Harry. 1949. Tonkawa syntactic suffixes and anaphoric particles. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 5:37–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Holisky, Dee A. 1979. On lexical aspect and verb classes in Georgian. In CLS Parasession on the Elements / Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR, 390–401. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Holisky, Dee A. 1981a. Aspect and Georgian medial verbs. New York: CaravanGoogle Scholar

Holisky, Dee A. 1981b. Aspect theory and Georgian aspect. In Tedeschi, Philip and Zaenen, Annie, eds., Tense and Aspect, 127–44. Syntax and semantics, 14. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Holisky, Dee A. 1987. The case of the intransitive subject in Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). Lingua 71:103–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan B., and Sandra, A. Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4:465–98Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT dissertation

Hyman, Larry, and Karl Zimmer. 1976. Embedded topic in French. In Li, ed., 189–211

Ikegami, Y. 1985. ‘Activity’ – ‘Accomplishment’ – ‘Achievement’: a language that can't say ‘I burned it but it didn't burn’ and one that can. In , A. Makkai and , A. Melby, eds., Linguistics and philosophy: essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells, 265–304. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Imai, Shingo. 1998. Logical structures and case marking in Japanese. Unpublished MA project, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Ioup, G. 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. In , J. Kimball, ed., Syntax and semantics, 4, 37–58. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7:89–150Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1977. X-bar syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1992. Madame Tussaud meets the Binding Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10:1–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and possibly even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:305–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, Anne. 2000. Sentence intertwining in Danish – a challenge to the Role and Reference Grammar account? Paper presented at the Conference on New Theoretical Perspectives on Syntax and Semantics in Cognitive Science, Dubrovnik, Croatia. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Johnson, Mark. 1987. A new approach to clause structure in Role and Reference Grammar. In Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 2:55–9. Davis: University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Jolly, Julia. 1991. Prepositional analysis within the framework of Role and Reference Grammar. New York: Peter LangGoogle Scholar

Jolly, Julia. 1993. Preposition assignment in English. In Van Valin, ed., 275–310

Jones, W., and P. Jones. 1991. Barasano syntax, Studies in the Languages of Colombia, 2. Dallas: SIL

Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Hingham, MA: KluwerGoogle Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Li, ed., 247–301

Kim, Alan H. O. 1988. Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E. and Wirth, J., eds., Studies in syntactic typology, 147–72. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda, UCPL 91. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Klamer, Marian. 1994. Kambera: a language of eastern Indonesia, HIL dissertations, 11. Amsterdam: Holland Institute of Generative LinguisticsGoogle Scholar

Kluender, Robert. 1992. Deriving island constraints from principles of predication. In Goodluck, Helen and Rochmont, Michael, eds., Island constraints, 223–58. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef Google Scholar

Kockelman, Paul. 2003. The interclausal relations hierachy in Q'eqchi' Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics. 69:25–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1972a. Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3:269–320Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu 1972b. Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry 3:161–96Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Kuno, Susumu 1975. Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, 276–336. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar

Kuno, Susumu 1987. Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Kuno, Susumu 1991. Remarks on quantifier scope. In , H. Nakajima, ed., Current English linguistics in Japan, 261–87. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Kuno, S., Takami, K. and Wu., Y. 1999. Quantifier scope in English, Chinese and Japanese. Language 75:63–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Kwee Tjoe Liong. 2002. More-than-complex sentences – modifiers, layering, and recursion, in Functional Grammar and in Role and Reference Grammar. Paper presented at 2002 Role and Reference Grammar Conference, Universidad de La Rioja, Spain

Lambrecht, Knud. 1986. Topic, focus and the grammar of spoken French. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Lambrecht, Knud 1987. Sentence focus, information structure, and the thetic-categorial distinction. BLS 13:366–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud 2000. When subjects behave like objects: a markedness analysis of sentence focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language 24:611–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71:1–62CrossRef Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy. 1990. Grammatical relations in Chinese. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: a partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23:379–434CrossRef Google Scholar

Li, Charles, ed. 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles, and Rainer Lang. 1979. The syntactic irrelevance of an ergative case in Enga and other Papuan languages. In Plank, F., ed., Ergativity, 307–24. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Mairal, R. and P. Faber. 2002. Functional Grammar and lexical templates. In Mairal and Pérez Quintero, eds., 39–94

Mairal, R. and , M. J. Pérez Quintero, eds. 2002. New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar. Berlin / New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRef Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 1986. Clause-bounded reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In , L. Hellan and , K. Christensen, eds., Topics in Scandinavian syntax, 53–64. Dordrecht: ReidelGoogle Scholar

Matasović, Ranko, 2001. Adjective phrases. Unpublished ms., University of Zagreb. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Mathesius, Vilém. 1928. On linguistic characterology with illustrations from modern English. Actes du Premier Congrès international de linguistes à la Haye, 56–63. [Reprinted in Vachek (1964:59–67).]

Mathesius, Vilém 1929. Functional linguistics. In Vachek (1983:121–42)

Matthiessen, Christian, and Sandra Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In , J. Haiman and , S. Thompson, eds., Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–330. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1982. Adverbs and logical form. Language 58:144–84CrossRef Google Scholar

McLendon, Sally. 1978. Ergativity, case, and transitivity in Eastern Pomo. International Journal of American Linguistics 44:1–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Melinger, Alissa. 1996. Quantifier scope in Italian: a syntactic comparison. In Ng, Eve and Grimm, Corinne, eds., Proceedings from the Second Buffalo-Toronto Student Conference in Linguistics, 160–78. Buffalo: University at Buffalo Linguistics DeptGoogle Scholar

Michaelis, Laura. 1993. On deviant case marking in Latin. In Van Valin, ed., 311–73

Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Grammatical relations and clause structure in Malayalam. In Bresnan, ed., 504–89

Narasimhan, B. 1998. A lexical semantic explanation for ‘quirky’ case marking in Hindi. Studia Linguistica 52:48–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62:56–119CrossRef Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRef Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael, and Bavin-Woock, Edith. 1978. The passive analog in Lango. BLS 4:28–39Google Scholar

Nunes, Mary L. 1993. Argument linking in English derived nominals. In Van Valin, ed., 375–432

Ohori, Toshio. 1996. Case markers and clause linkage: toward a semantic typology. In , E. Casad, ed., Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods, 693–712. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Ohori, Toshio 2001. Some thoughts on a new systematization of interclausal semantic relations. Paper presented at 2001 Role and Reference Grammar Conference, University of California, Santa Barbara. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Olson, Michael L. 1978. Switch-reference in Barai. BLS 4:140–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Olson, Michael L. 1981. Barai clause junctures: toward a functional theory of interclausal relations. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, Australian National University

Osborne, C. R. 1974. The Tiwi language. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal StudiesGoogle Scholar

Paris, Luis. 2003. Grammatical encoding of event relations: gerund phrases in Spanish. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo

Park, Ki-seong. 1993. Korean causatives in Role and Reference Grammar. MA thesis, SUNY at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Pavey, Emma. 2001. Information structure in Acadian French. Unpublished MA thesis, University of North Dakota. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Pavey, Emma 2004. The English IT-cleft construction: a Role and Reference Grammar analysis. Unpublished D.Phil. dissertation, University of Sussex. (Available on RRG web site.)

Payne, Doris L., and Thomas E. Payne. 1989. Yagua. In Derbyshire and Pullum, eds. (1989), 249–474

Pollard, Carl, and Ivan, A. Sag. 1992. Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 2:261–304Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen. 1981a. Topicalization, focus movement and Yiddish movement: a pragmatic differentiation. BLS 7:249–64Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen 1981b. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Cole, ed., 223–56

Pustejovsky, James J. 1991. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17:409–41Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In , M. Butt and , W. Geuder, eds., The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLIGoogle Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27:53–94Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 1990. Explaining word order in the noun phrase. Linguistics 28:5–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan 2002. The noun phrase: a typological study of its form and structure. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, John. 1987. Amele. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar

Roberts, John 1988. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 45–64Google Scholar

Roberts, John 2002. Distributives in Role and Reference Grammar. Unpublished ms

Roberts, Linda. 1995. Pivots, voice and macroroles: from Germanic to universal grammar. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:157–214CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, MIT

Ross, John Robert 1972. Act. In , D. Davidson and , G. Harman, eds., Semantics of natural language, 70–126. Dordrecht: ReidelGoogle Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Linda. 1993. On the syntactic and semantic alignment of attributive and identificational constructions. In Van Valin, ed., 433–63

Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elizabeth 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress and phrasing. In , J. Goldsmith, ed., The handbook of phonological theory, 550–69. Oxford: BlackwellsGoogle Scholar

Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová and Jarmila Panevová. 1986. The meaning of the sentence in its semantic and pragmatic aspects, ed. Jacob L. Mey. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel

Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 1995. Focus structure and morphosyntax in Japanese: WA and GA, and word order flexibility. preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Shimojo, Mitsuaki 2002. Functional theories of island phenomena: the case of Japanese. Studies in Language 26:67–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Shopen, Timothy, ed. 1985. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. I: Clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In , R. M. W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal StudiesGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, Michael 1981. Case marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1:227–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael 1993. Of nominatives and datives: Universal grammar from the bottom up. In Van Valin, ed., 465–98

Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The parameter of aspect (2nd edn). Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 1982. How presuppositions are inherited: a solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 13:483–545Google Scholar

Stahlke, H. 1970. Serial verbs. Studies in African Linguistics 1. 60–99Google Scholar

Sugamoto, Nobuko. 1984. Reflexives in Toba Batak. In , P. Schachter, ed., Studies in the structure of Toba Batak, 150–71. UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 5. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of LinguisticsGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, N. 1991. Focus and conditions on representations. Lingua 83:183–248CrossRef Google Scholar

Swadesh, Morris. 1939. Nootka internal syntax. International Journal of American Linguistics 9:77–102CrossRef Google Scholar

Takami, Ken-ichi. 1988. Preposition stranding: arguments against syntactic analyses and an alternative functional explanation. Lingua 76:299–335CrossRef Google Scholar

Tallerman, Maggie. 1998. Understanding syntax. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On complementation in Icelandic. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1991. Long-distance reflexives and the typology of noun phrases. In , J. Koster and , E. Reuland, eds., Long-distance anaphora, 49–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Thurman, Robert. 1975. Chuave medial verbs. Anthropological Linguistics 17. 7:342–52Google Scholar

Tomcsányi, Judit. 1988. Roles y Referencia en Bribri: aspectos de la determinación funcional en las structuras sintácticas. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, National University of Costa Rica

Toratani, Kiyoko. 1998. Lexical aspect and split intransitivity in Japanese. CLS 34:377–92Google Scholar

Toratani, Kiyoko 2002. The morphosyntax and the logical structures of compound verbs in Japanese. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Vachek, J., ed. 1964. A Prague School reader in linguistics. Bloomington, inchoative: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar

Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The informational component. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1977. Aspects of Lakhota syntax. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 1981. Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5:361–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1985. Case marking and the structure of the Lakhota clause. In , J. Nichols and , A. Woodbury, eds., Grammar inside and outside the clause, 363–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 1987. The role of government in the grammar of head-marking languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53:371–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66:221–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:145–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. ed. 1993a. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1993b. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Van Valin, ed., 1–164

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1995. Toward a functionalist account of so-called extraction constraints. In Devriendt, Betty, Goossens, Louis and Auwera, Johan, eds., Complex structures: a functionalist perspective, 29–60. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1998. The acquisition of WH-questions and the mechanisms of language acquisition. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 221–49. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1999a. Generalized semantic roles and the syntax–semantics interface. In F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin and J.-M. Marandin, eds., Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 2, 373–89. The Hague: Thesus. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1999b. A typology of the interaction of focus structure and syntax. In E. Raxilina and J. Testelec, eds., Typology and linguistic theory: from description to explanation, 511–24. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van, Valin, Robert, D. Jr. 2001a. The acquisition of complex sentences: a case study in the role of theory in the study of language development. CLS 36. 2:511–31Google Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 2001b. An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr. 2002. The development of subject–auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: an alternative analysis. Journal of Child Language 29:161–75Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2003. Minimalism and explanation. In J. Moore and M. Polinsky, eds., Explanation in linguistics, 281–97. Stanford: CSLI. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2004. Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. Unpublished ms., University at Buffalo. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. On the relationship between syntactic theory and models of language processing. In A. Bornkessel and Matthias Schlesewsky, eds., Semantic role universals and argument linking: theoretical, typological and psycho-/neurolinguistic perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Available on Role and Reference Grammar web site.)

Van, Valin, Robert, D Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., and David P. Wilkins. 1993. Predicting syntactic structure from semantic representations: remember in English and Mparntwe Arrernte. In Van Valin, ed., 499–534

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., and David P. Wilkins. 1996. The case for ‘effector’: case roles, agents and agency revisited. In , M. Shibatani and , S. Thompson, eds., Grammatical constructions, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk J. 1972. On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Walton, Charles. 1986. Sama verbal semantics: classification, derivation and inflection. Manila: Linguistic Society of the PhilippinesGoogle Scholar

Wasow Thomas. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas and Akmajian, Adrian, eds., Formal syntax, 327–60. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Watanabe, K. 1995. Quantification and focus structure in Japanese. Unpublished paper, SUNY Buffalo

Watters, James K. 1986. Notes on Tepehua verbal semantics. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 1:118–44Google Scholar

Watters, James K. 1988. Topics in Tepehua grammar. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Watters, James K.1993. An investigation of Turkish clause linkage. In Van Valin, ed., 535–60

Weber, David J. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua, University of California Publications in Linguistics 112. Berkeley: University of California Press

Weist, R. M. 2002. The first language acquisition of tense and aspect: a review. In , R. Salaberry and , Y. Shirai, eds., Tense–aspect morphology in L2 acquisition, 21–78. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A. and Carapella, J.. 2004. Syntactic–semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child Language 31:31–60CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whaley, Lindsay J. 1993. The status of obliques in linguistic theory. preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo

Wilkins, David P. 1988. Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): form, function, and problems of identity. In Austin, Peter, ed., Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages, 141–76. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. 1989. Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): studies in the structure and semantics of grammar. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, Australian National University

Wilkins, David P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. In Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 91–01:207–57. Department of Linguistics, University at Buffalo

Williamson, Janice. 1984. Studies in Lakhota grammar. Unpublished preposition/postpositionh.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego

Winther-Nielsen, Nicolai. 1995. A functional discourse grammar of Joshua: a computer-assisted rhetorical structure analysis. Stockholm: Almqvist & WiksellGoogle Scholar

Yang, Byong-seon. 1994. Morphosyntactic phenomena of Korean in Role and Reference Grammar: psych-verb constructions, inflectional verb morphemes, complex sentences, and relative clauses. preposition/postpositionh. D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo. Seoul: Hankuk Publishers

Zaenen, Annie , Joan Maling, and Hölskuldur Thráinsson, . 1985. Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3:441–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Zovko, Irena. 2000. Dative shift in Croatian. Paper presented at the Conference on New Theoretical Approaches to Syntax and Semantics in Cognitive Science, Dubrovnik

Zovko, Irena 2001. Semantičko-sintaktički odnosi u rečenicama s dvostruko prijelaznim glagolima u engleskom jeziku. MA thesis, University of Zagreb