Scott, É.-L., “Principes de phonautographie” (sealed manuscript), Paris: Archives de l’Académie des sciences, January 26, 1857.Google Scholar

Scott, É.-L., “Inscription automatique des sons de l’air au moyen d’une oreille artificielle,” Comptes Rendus Ac. Sc. Paris, Vol. LIII, No. 3, pp. 108–11, 1861.Google Scholar

Koenig, W., Dunn, H. K., and Lacy, D. Y., “The sound spectrograph,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 19–49, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, R. K., Kopp, G. A., and Green, H. C., Visible Speech, Amsterdam: D. von Nostrand, 1947.Google Scholar

Abbott, B. P. et al., “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 116, No. 6, pp. 061102–1–061102–16, 2016.Google Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É., Jaffard, S., and Meyer, Y., “Des ondelettes pour détecter les ondes gravitationnelles,” Gazette de la Société Mathématique de France, No. 148, pp. 61–4, 2016.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., Time-Frequency/Time-Scale Analysis, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Donoho, D., “50 years of Data Science,” J. Comput. Graph. Stat., Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 745– 66, 2017.Google Scholar

Ade, P. A. R. et al., “Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results,” Astron. Astrophys., Vol. 571, A1, 2014.Google Scholar

Wiener, N., Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1949.Google Scholar

Blanc-Lapierre, A. and Fortet, R., Théorie des Fonctions Aléatoires, Paris: Masson, 1953.Google Scholar

Fourier, J., Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur, Paris: Firmon-Didot, 1822.Google Scholar

Escudié, B., Gazanhes, C., Tachoire, H., and Torra, V., Des Cordes aux Ondelettes, Aix-enProvence: Publications de l’Université de Provence, 2001.Google Scholar

Cooley, J. W. and Tukey, J. W., “An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series,” Math. Comput., Vol. 19, pp. 297–301, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, J. P., “Fourier, un mathématicien inspiré par la physique,” Images de la Physique 2009, Article 01, CNRS, 2009. www.cnrs.fr/publications/imagesdelaphysique/couv-PDF/IdP2009/Article_01.pdfGoogle Scholar

Wiener, N., Ex-Prodigy: My Childhood and Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Grossmann, A. and Morlet, J., “Decomposition of Hardy functions into square-integrable wavelets of constant shape,” SIAM J. Math. Anal., Vol. 15, pp. 723–36, 1984.Google Scholar

Meyer, Y., Ondelettes et Opérateurs I. Ondelettes, Paris: Hermann, 1990.Google Scholar

Daubechies, I., Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallat, S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing – The Sparse Way (3rd edn.), Burlington, MA: Academic Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Boashash, B. (ed.), Time-Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing – A Comprehensive Reference (2nd edn.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Time-Frequency Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar

Gröchenig, K., Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis, Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 2011.Google Scholar

Spallanzani, L., Lettere sopra il sospetto di un nuovo senso nei pipistrelli, Torino: Nella Stamperia reale, 1794.Google Scholar

Pierce, G. W. and Griffin, D. R., “Experimental determination of supersonic notes emitted by bats,” J. Mammal., Vol. 19, pp. 454–5, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, J. A., “A view of the world through the bat’s ear: The formation of acoustic images in echolocation,” Cognition, Vol. 33, pp. 55–199, 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berry, M. V., “Hearing the music of the primes: Auditory complementarity and the siren song of zeta,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., Vol. 45, 382001, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazur, B. and Stein, W., Prime Numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gabor, D., “Theory of communication,” J. IEE, Vol. 93, pp. 429–41, 1946.Google Scholar

Ville, J., “Théorie et applications de la notion de signal analytique,” Câbles et Transmissions, Vol. 2A, pp. 61–74, 1948.Google Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É. and Flandrin, P., “On the stationary phase approximation of chirp spectra,” in Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis, pp. 117–20, Pittsburgh, PA: IEEE, 1998.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Time frequency and chirps,” in Proceedings of SPIE 4391, Wavelet Applications VIII, 161, 2001.Google Scholar

Vakman, D., “On the analytic signal, the Teager-Kaiser energy algorithm, and other methods for defining amplitude and frequency,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 791–7, 1996.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., Sageloli, J., Sessarego, J. P., and Zakharia, M., “Application of time-frequency analysis to the characterization of surface waves on elastic targets,” Acoust. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 23–8, 1986.Google Scholar

Storey, L. R. O., “An investigation of whistling atmospherics,” Proc. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 246, No. 908, pp. 113–41, 1953.Google Scholar

Kevlahan, N. K.-R. and Vassilicos, J. C., “The space and scale dependencies of the self-similar structure of turbulence,” Proc. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 447, No. 1930, pp. 341–63, 1994.Google Scholar

Schiff, S. J. et al., “Brain chirps: Spectrographic signatures of epileptic seizures,” Clin. Neurophysiol., Vol. 111, No. 6, pp. 953–8, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duchêne, J., Devedeux, D., Mansour, S., and Marque, C., “Analyzing uterine EMG: Tracking instantaneous burst frequency,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 125–32, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sornette, D., “Discrete scale invariance and complex dimensions,” Phys. Rep., Vol. 297, No. 5, pp. 239–70, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmonds, J. and MacLennan, D., Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice (2nd edn.), Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2005.Google Scholar

Goupillaud, P. L., “Signal design in the ‘vibroseis’ ^® technique,” Geophysics, Vol. 41, pp. 1291–304, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papoulis, A., Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar

Vetterli, M., Kovac̆ević, J., and Goyal, V. K., Foundations of Signal Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unser, M. and Tafti, P., An Introduction to Sparse Stochastic Processes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Schreier, J. and Scharf, L. L., Statistical Signal Processing of Complex-Valued Data: The Theory of Improper and Noncircular Signals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pugh, E. L., “The generalized analytic signal,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 674–99, 1982.Google Scholar

Heideman, M. T., Johnson, D. H., and Burrus, C. S., “Gauss and the history of the Fast Fourier Transform,” IEEE Acoust. Speech Signal Proc. Mag., Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 14–21, 1984.Google Scholar

De Bruijn, N. G., “Uncertainty principles in Fourier analysis,” in Inequalities (Shisha, O., ed.), pp. 57–71, New York: Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Glauber, R. J., “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,” Phys. Rev., Vol. 131, pp. 2766–88, 1963.Google Scholar

Helström, C. W., “An expansion of a signal in Gaussian elementary signals,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 81–2, 1968.Google Scholar

Husimi, K., “Some formal properties of the density matrix,” Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn., Vol. 22, pp. 264–314, 1940.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W., “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematic und Mechanik,” Zeit. Physik, Vol. 43, No. 3–4, pp. 172–98, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyl, H., Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1928.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E., “Zum Heisenbergschen Unschärfeprinzip,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vol. 14, pp. 296–303, 1930. English translation available at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9903100.Google Scholar

Hirschman, I. I., “A note on entropy,” Amer. J. Math., Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 152–6, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckner, W., “Inequalities in Fourier analysis,” Ann. Math., Vol. 102, No. 1, pp. 159–82, 1975.Google Scholar

Folland, G. B. and Sitaram, A., “The uncertainty principle: A mathematical survey,” J. Fourier Anal. Appl., Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 207–38, 1997.Google Scholar

Dembo, A., Cover, T. M., and Thomas, J. A., “Information theoretic inequalities,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1501–18, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flandrin, P., “The many roads to time-frequency,” in Nonlinear and Nonstationary Signal Processing (Walden, A. et al., eds.), Isaac Newton Institute Series, pp. 275–91, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Woodward, P. M., Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar, London: Pergamon Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Ambiguity functions,” in [21], Article 5.1, pp. 238–43.Google Scholar

Turin, G. L., “An introduction to matched filters,” IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 311–29, 1960.Google Scholar

Wigner, E. P., “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” Phys. Rev., Vol. 40, pp. 749–59, 1932.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. L., “When is the Wigner quasi-probabilty density non-negative?,” Rep. Math. Phys., Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 249–52, 1974.Google Scholar

Rioul, O. and Flandrin, P., “Time-scale energy distributions: A general class extending wavelet transforms,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1746–57, 1992.Google Scholar

Percival, D. B. and Walden, A. T., Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications: Multitaper and Conventional Univariate Techniques, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folland, G. B., Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Ann. of Math. Studies No. 122, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claasen, T. A. C. M. and Mecklenbräuker, W. F. G., “The Wigner distribution – A tool for time-frequency signal analysis. Part I: Continuous-time signals, Part II: Discrete-time signals, Part III: Relations with other time-frequency signal transformations,” Philips J. Res., Vol. 35, pp. 217–50, 276–300, and 372–89, 1980.Google Scholar

Mecklenbräuker, W. F. G. and Hlawatsch, F. (eds.), The Wigner Distribution: Theory and Applications in Signal Processing, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.Google Scholar

Lieb, E. H., “Integral bounds for radar ambiguity functions and Wigner distributions,” J. Math. Phys., Vol. 31, pp. 594–9, 1990.Google Scholar

Baraniuk, R. G., Flandrin, P., Janssen, A. J. E. M., and Michel, O. J. J., “Measuring time-frequency information content using the Rényi entropies,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1391–409, 2001.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Maximum signal energy concentration in a time-frequency domain,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-88, pp. 2176–79, New York, 1988.Google Scholar

Janssen, A. J. E. M., “Optimality property of the Gaussian window spectrogram,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 39, pp. 202–4, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Cross-terms and localization in time-frequency energy distributions,” in [21], Article 4.2, pp. 151–8.Google Scholar

Silverman, R. A., “Locally stationary random processes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 3, pp. 182–7, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgnat, P., Flandrin, P., Honeine, P., Richard, C., and Xiao, J., “Testing stationarity with surrogates: A time-frequency approach,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 3459–70, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelbrot, B. B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (3rd edn.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1983.Google Scholar

Makhoul, J., “Linear prediction: A tutorial review,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 561–80.Google Scholar

Abry, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Flandrin, P., “Wavelets, spectrum analysis, and 1/ f processes,” in Wavelets and Statistics (Antoniadis, A. et al., eds.), Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 103, pp. 15–29, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., and Farmer, J. D., “Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data,” Physica D, Vol. 58, No. 1–4, pp. 77–94, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basseville, M., “Distances measures for signal processing and pattern recognition,” Signal Proc.,Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 349–69, 1989.Google Scholar

Hlawatsch, F. and Flandrin, P., “The interference structure of the Wigner distribution and related time-frequency signal representations,” in [69], pp. 59–133.Google Scholar

Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., and Chiu, S. N., Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams (2nd edn.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P. and Gonçalvès, P., “Geometry of affine time-frequency distributions,” Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 10–39, 1996.Google Scholar

Kodera, K., de Villedary, C., and Gendrin, R., “A new method for the numerical analysis of non-stationary signals,” Phys. Earth Plan. Int., Vol. 12, pp. 142–50, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kodera, K., Gendrin, R., and de Villedary, C., “Analysis of time-varying signals with small BT values,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., Vol. 26, pp. 64–76, 1978.Google Scholar

Auger, F. and Flandrin, P., “Improving the readability of time-frequency and time-scale representations by the reassignment method,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 1068–89, 1995.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., Auger, F., and Chassande-Mottin, É., “Time-frequency reassignment – From principles to algorithms,” in Applications in Time-Frequency Signal Processing (Papandreou-Suppappola, A., ed.), Chapter 5, pp. 179–203, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Fulop, S. A. and Fitz, K., “A spectrogram for the twenty-first century,” Acoust. Today, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 26–33, 2006.Google Scholar

Welch, P. D., “The use of the Fast Fourier Transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., Vol. AU-15, pp. 70–3, 1967.Google Scholar

Thomson, D. J., “Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 70, No. 9, pp. 1055–96, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xiao, J. and Flandrin, P., “Multitaper time-frequency reassignment for nonstationary spectrum estimation and chirp enhancement,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 2851–60, 2007.Google Scholar

Daubechies, I. and Maes, S., “A nonlinear squeezing of the continuous wavelet transform based on auditory nerve models,” in Wavelets in Medicine and Biology (Aldroubi, A. and Unser, M., eds.), pp. 527–46, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Auger, F., Flandrin, P., Lin, Y. T., McLaughlin, S., Meignen, S., Oberlin, T., and Wu, H. T., “Time-frequency reassignment and synchrosqueezing,” IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 32–41, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flandrin, P., “A note on reassigned Gabor spectrograms of Hermite functions,” J. Fourier Anal. Appl., Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 285–95, 2012.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Some features of time-frequency representations of multicomponent signals,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-84, pp. 41B.4.1–41B.4.4, San Diego, CA, 1984.Google Scholar

Donoho, D. L., “Compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 1289– 306, 2006.Google Scholar

Candès, E., Romberg, J., and Tao, T., “Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 59, No. 8, pp. 1207–23, 2006.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P. and Borgnat, P., “Time-frequency energy distributions meet compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 2974–82, 2010.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., Pustelnik, N., and Borgnat, P., “On Wigner-based sparse time-frequency distributions,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing CAMSAP-15, Cancun, 2015.Google Scholar

Oberlin, T., Meignen, S., and Perrier, V., “Second-order synchrosqueezing transform or invertible reassignment? Towards ideal time-frequency representations,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 1335–44, 2015.Google Scholar

Pham, D. H. and Meignen, S., “High-order synchrosqueezing transform for multicomponent signals analysis – With an application to gravitational-wave signal,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 65, No. 12, pp. 3168–78, 2017.Google Scholar

Huang, N. E. and Chen, S. P. (eds.), Hilbert-Huang Transform and Its Applications (2nd edn.), Singapore: World Scientific, 2014.Google Scholar

Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C. C., and Liu, H. H., “The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 454, pp. 903–95, 1998.Google Scholar

Daubechies, I., Lu, J., and Wu, H.-T., “Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool,” Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 243–61, 2011.Google Scholar

Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., and Gonçalves, P., “On Empirical Mode Decomposition and its algorithms,” in Proceedings of IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP-03, Grado (Italy), 2003.Google Scholar

Colominas, M., Schlotthauer, G., Torres, M. E., and Flandrin, P., “Noise-assisted EMD methods in action,” Adv. Adapt. Data Anal., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1250025.1–1250025.11, 2013.Google Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É., Daubechies, I., Auger, F., and Flandrin, P., “Differential reassignment,” IEEE Signal Proc. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 293–4, 1997.Google Scholar

Bargmann, V., “On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, pp. 187–214, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auger, F., Chassande-Mottin, É., and Flandrin, P., “On phase-magnitude relationships in the Short-Time Fourier Transform,” IEEE Signal Proc. Lett., Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 267–70, 2012.Google Scholar

Auger, F., Chassande-Mottin, É., and Flandrin, P., “Making reassignment adjustable: The Levenberg-Marquardt approach,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing of ICASSP-12, pp. 3889–92, Kyoto, 2012.Google Scholar

Hansson-Sandsten, M. and Brynolfsson, J., “The scaled reassigned spectrogram with perfect localization for estimation of Gaussian functions,” IEEE Signal Proc. Lett., Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 100–4, 2015.Google Scholar

Lim, Y., Shinn-Cunningham, B., and Gardner, T. J., “Sparse contour representation of sound,” IEEE Signal Proc. Lett., Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 684–7, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É., “Méthodes de réallocation dans le plan temps-fréquence pour l’analyse et le traitement de signaux non stationnaires,” PhD thesis, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France, 1998.Google Scholar

Gardner, T. J. and Magnasco, M. O., “Sparse time-frequency representations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Vol. 103, No. 16, pp. 6094–9, 2006.Google Scholar

Meignen, S., Gardner, T., and Oberlin, T., “Time-frequency ridge analysis based on reassignment vector,” Proceedings of 23rd European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO-15, pp. 1486–90, Nice, 2015.Google Scholar

Meignen, S., Oberlin, T., Depalle, Ph., Flandrin, P., and McLaughlin, S., “Adaptive multimode signal reconstruction from time-frequency representations,” Proc. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 374: 20150205, 2016.Google Scholar

Delprat, N., Escudié, B., Guillemain, Ph., Kronland-Martinet, R., Tchamitchian, Ph., and Torrésani, Bruno, “Asymptotic wavelet and Gabor analysis: Extraction of instantaneous frequencies,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 644–64, 1992.Google Scholar

Carmona, R., Hwang, W.-L., and Torrésani, B., Practical Time-Frequency Analysis: Gabor and Wavelet Transforms With an Implementation in S, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bardenet, R., Flamant, J., and Chainais, P., “On the zeros of the spectrogram of white noise,” arXiv:1708.00082v1, 2017.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “On spectrogram local maxima,” in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-07, pp. 3979–83, New Orleans, 2017.Google Scholar

Conway, J. and Sloane, N. J. A., Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups (3rd edn.), New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar

Diggle, P. J., Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (2nd edn.), London: Academic Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., and Mecke, J., Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.Google Scholar

Churchman, L. S., Flyvberg, H., and Spudich, J. A., “A non-Gaussian distribution quantifies distances measured with fluorescence localization techniques,” Biophys. J., Vol. 90, pp. 668–71, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, London: Dover, 1965.Google Scholar

Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T., Modeling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, S., An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, London: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar

Calka, P., “An explicit expression for the distribution of the number of sides of the typical Poisson-Voronoi cell,” Adv. Appl. Prob., Vol. 35, pp. 863–70, 2003.Google Scholar

Ferenc, J.-S. and Néda, Z., “On the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells,” Physica A, Vol. 385, pp. 518–26, 2007.Google Scholar

Tanemura, M., “Statistical distributions of Poisson-Voronoi cells in two and three dimensions,” Forma, Vol. 18, pp. 221–47, 2003.Google Scholar

Lucarini, V., “From symmetry breaking to Poisson point process in 2D – Voronoi tessellations: The generic nature of hexagons,” J. Stat. Phys., Vol. 130, pp. 1047–62, 2008.Google Scholar

Wang, A., “An industrial-strength audio search algorithm,” in Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval ISMIR-03, Baltimore, MD, 2003.Google Scholar

Klimenko, S., Yakushin, I., Mercer, A., and Mitselmakher, G., “A coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts,” Class. Quant. Grav., Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 114029, 2008.Google Scholar

Haenggi, M., Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Boas, R. P., Entire Functions, New York: Academic Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Toda, M., “Phase retrieval problem in quantum chaos and its relation to the origin of irreversibility I,” Physica D, Vol. 59, pp. 121–41, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, J. B., Krishnapur, M., Peres, Y., and Virág, B., Zeros of Gaussian Analytic Functions and Determinantal Point Processes, AMS University Lecture Series, Vol. 51, 2009.Google Scholar

Lebœuf, P. and Voros, A., “Chaos-revealing multiplicative representation of quantum eigenstates,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 23, pp. 1765–74, 1990.Google Scholar

Korsch, H. J., Müller, C., and Wiescher, H., “On the zeros of the Husimi distribution,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 30, pp. L677–L684, 1997.Google Scholar

Macchi, O., “The coincidence approach to stochastic point processes,” Adv. Appl. Prob., Vol 7, No. 2, pp. 83–122, 1975.Google Scholar

Biscio, C. A. N. and Lavancier, F., “Quantifying repulsiveness of determinantal point processes,” Bernoulli, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp 2001–28, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavancier, F., Møller, J., and Rubak, E., “Determinantal point process models and statistical inference,” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 853–77, 2015.Google Scholar

Hannay, J. H., “Chaotic analytic zero points: Exact statistics for those of a random spin state,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 29, pp. L101–L105, 1996.Google Scholar

Nazarov, F., Sodin, M., and Volberg, A., “Transportation to random zeroes by the gradient flow,” Geom. Funct. Anal., Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 887–935, 2007.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “Time-frequency filtering from spectrogram zeros,” IEEE Signal Proc. Lett., Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 2137–41, 2015.Google Scholar

Balasz, P., Bayer, D., Jaillet, F., and Søndergaard, P., “The pole behavior of the phase derivative of the short-time Fourier transform,” Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., Vol. 40, pp. 610–21, 2016.Google Scholar

Nye, J. F. and Berry, M. V., “Dislocations in wave trains,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 336, pp. 165–90, 1974.Google Scholar

Blanchet, L., Damour, T., Iyer, B. R., Will, C. M., and Wiseman, A. G., “Gravitational-radiation damping of compact binary systems to second post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 74, No. 18, pp. 3515–18, 1995.Google Scholar

Sathyaprakash, B. S. and Dhurandhar, S. V., “Choice of filters for the detection of gravitational waves from coalescing binaries,” Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 44, pp. 3819–34, 1991.Google Scholar

Thorne, K. S., “Gravitational radiation,” in 300 Years of Gravitation (Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W., eds.), pp. 330–458, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Buonanno, A. and Damour, T., “Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 59, pp. 084006, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É. and Flandrin, P., “On the time-frequency detection of chirps,” Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 252–81, 1999.Google Scholar

Jaffard, S., Journé, J. L., and Daubechies, I., “A simple Wilson orthonormal basis with exponential decay,” SIAM J. Math. Anal., Vol. 22, pp. 554–73, 1991.Google Scholar

Abbott, B. P. et al., “GW151226: Observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 116, pp. 241103–1–241103–14, 2016.Google Scholar

Flandrin, P., “The sound of silence: Recovering signals from time-frequency zeros,” in Proceedings of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 544–8, Pacific Grove, CA, 2016.Google Scholar

Chassande-Mottin, É. and Flandrin, P., “On the time-frequency detection of chirps and its application to gravitational waves,” in Second Workshop on Gravitational Wave Data Analysis, pp. 47–52, Paris: Éditions Frontières, 1999.Google Scholar

Nachtigall, P. E. and Moore, P. W. B. (eds.), Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance, NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences, Vol. 156, New York: Plenum Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Nagel, T., “What is it like to be a bat?,” Phil. Rev., Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 435–50, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altes, R. A. and Titlebaum, E. L., “Bat signals as optimally Doppler tolerant waveforms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 48(4B), pp. 1014–20, 1970.Google Scholar

Simmons, J. A., “The resolution of target range by echolocating bats,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 54, pp. 157–73, 1973.Google Scholar

Simmons, J. A., “Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar,” Science, Vol. 207, pp. 1336–8, 1979.Google Scholar

Simmons, J. A., Ferragamo, M., Moss, C. F., Stevenson, S. B., and Altes, R. A., “Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: The shape of targets images in echolocation,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, Vol. 167, pp. 589–616, 1990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Møhl, B., “Detection by a pipistrelle bat of normal and reverse replica of its sonar pulses,” Acustica, Vol. 61, pp. 75–82, 1986.Google Scholar

Altes, R. A., “Some theoretical concepts for echolocation,” in [158], pp. 725–52.Google Scholar

Altes, R. A., “Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 1232–46, 1980.Google Scholar

Altes, R. A., “Echolocation as seen from the viewpoint of radar/sonar theory,” in Localization and Orientation in Biology and Engineering (Varjú, D. and Schnitzler, H.-U., eds.), pp. 234–44, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar

Saillant, P., Simmons, J. A., and Dear, S., “A computational model of echo processing and acoustic imaging in frequency-modulated echolocating bats: The spectrogram correlation and transformation receiver,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 94, pp. 2691–712, 1993.Google Scholar

Jaffard, S. and Meyer, Y., “Wavelet methods for pointwise regularity and local oscillations of functions, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 587, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falconer, K., Fractal Geometry, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.Google Scholar

Berry, M. V. and Lewis, Z. V., “On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 370, pp. 459–84, 1980.Google Scholar

Borgnat, P. and Flandrin, P., “On the chirp decomposition of Weierstrass-Mandelbrot functions, and their time-frequency interpretation,” Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., Vol. 15, pp. 134–46, 2003.Google Scholar

Bertrand, J., Bertand, P., and Ovarlez, J.-Ph., “The Mellin transform,” in The Transforms and Applications Handbook (Poularikas, A., ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Flamant, J., Le Bihan, N., and Chainais, P., “Time-frequency analysis of bivariate signals,” arXiv:1609.02463, 2016.Google Scholar

Roussel, B., Cabart, C., Fève, G., Thibierge, E., and Degiovanni, P., “Electron quantum optics as quantum signal processing,” Phys. Status Solidi B, Vol. 254, pp. 16000621, 2017.Google Scholar

Stanković, L. J., Daković, M., and Sejdić, E., “Vertex-frequency analysis: A way to localize graph spectral components,” IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 176–82, 2017.Google Scholar