Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:11:33.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

Denis Feeney
Introduction by
Stephen Hinds
Denis Feeney
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Stephen Hinds
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 396 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J.N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore, MD and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 1999a. ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and centurionate’, JRS 89: 109–34Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 1999b. ‘Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry’, in Adams, J.N. and Mayer, R.G. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford. 97–133Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Adelman, J. 1973. The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Ahern, C.F. 1991. ‘Horace’s rewriting of Homer in Carmen 1.6’, CPh 86: 301–14Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von. 1981. ‘Mythos und römische Realität in Ovids “Metamorphosen”’, ANRW 2.31.4: 2328–42Google Scholar
Allan, W. 2008. Euripides: Helen. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Allen, A. 1986. ‘Sacrificial negligence in Catullus’, Latomus 45: 861–3Google Scholar
Altick, R.D. 1991. The Presence of the Present: Topics of the Day in the Victorian Novel. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Alton, E.H. 1922. ‘Quaestiunculae Ovidianae’, Hermathena 19.43: 276–91Google Scholar
Alton, E.H., Wormell, D.E.W. and Courtney, E. 1978/1985. P. Ovidi Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Anders, H.R.D. 1904. Shakespeare’s Books: A Dissertation on Shakespeare’s Reading and the Immediate Sources of his Works. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.D., Parsons, P.J. and Nisbet, R.J.M. 1978. ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm’, JRS 68: 125–55Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto, Buffalo, NY and LondonGoogle Scholar
Andreau, J. 1968. ‘Banque grecque et banque romaine dans le théâtre de Plaute et de Térence’, MEFRA 80: 461–526Google Scholar
Andrieu, J. 1954. Le Dialogue antique: structure et présentation. ParisGoogle Scholar
Aresi, L. 2017. Nel giardino di Pomona. Le Metamorfosi di Ovidio e l’invenzione di una mitologia in terra d’Italia. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1993. ‘The addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean protreptic’, MD 31: 185–230Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. . 2004. ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De Morte’, in Fitzgerald, J.T., Obbink, D. and Holland, G.S. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden. 15–54Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Bastianini, G. 2002. Posidippi Pellaei Quae Supersunt Omnia. MilanGoogle Scholar
Austin, N. 1994. Helen of Troy and her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.G. . 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ax, W. 1993. ‘Phaselus ille-Sabinus ille—Ein Beitrag zur neueren Diskussion um die Beziehung zwischen Texten’, in Ax, W. and Glei, R.F. (eds.), Literaturparodie in Antike und Mittelalter. Trier. 75–100Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1985. ‘A phantom marriage law’, Philologus 192: 82–98Google Scholar
Badian, E. . 1972. ‘Ennius and his friends’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 17. Geneva. 149–208Google Scholar
Baehrens, E. 1885. Catulli Veronensis Liber. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Baines, B.J. 1996. ‘Girard’s doubles and Antony and Cleopatra’, in Wood (1996). 9–39Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. 1968. Rabelais and his World, tr. H. Iswolsky. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T.W. 1944. William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Bang, P.F. 2008. The Roman Bazaar: A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2012. ‘Pliny’s epistolary dreams and the ghost of Domitian’, TAPhA 142: 105–32Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C.S. 2013. ‘Intertextuality: introduction’, AJPh 134: 1–8Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1991. ‘Discordant Muses’, PCPhS 37: 1–21Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993a. ‘Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2,1 e Ovidio, Tristia II’, MD 31: 149–84Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993b. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95: 333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1994. Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. RomeGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1996. ‘Poetry, praise and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’, ClAnt 15: 5–47Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Translation of Barchiesi (1994)Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2000. ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 167–82Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001a. ‘Some points on a map of shipwrecks’, in Fox, M. and Marchesi, S. (trs. and eds.), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London. 141–54Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001b. ‘Horace and iambos: the poet as literary historian’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 141–64Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002a. ‘The uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and its tradition’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 107–23Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002b. ‘Martial arts. Mars Ultor in the Forum Augustum. A verbal monument with a vengeance’, in Herbert-Brown, G. (ed.), Ovid’s Fasti: Historical Readings at its Bimillennium. Oxford. 1–22Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005. ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 320–42Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2008. ‘Senatus consultum de Lycaone: Concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 61: 117–45Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. 1962. Nevio epico: Storia, interpretazione, edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, M. . 1970. ‘Plauto e il “metateatro” antico’, Il Verri 31: 113–30Google Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. . 2001. ‘What did Shakespeare read?’, in de Grazia, M. and Wells, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare. Cambridge. 31–47Google Scholar
Barlow, C.T. 1978. Bankers, Moneylenders, and Interest Rates in the Roman Republic. Diss., University of North Carolina-Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 1991. Talking it Over. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T.D. 1998. ‘Tacitus and the Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre’, Phoenix 52: 125–48Google Scholar
Barsby, J. 1995. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as improvisatory drama’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 55–70Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1957. Mythologies. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1968. ‘L’effet de réel’, Communications 11: 84–9Google Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1972. Mythologies, tr. A. Lavers. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1975. Le Plaisir du texte. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. . 1978. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments, tr. R. Howard. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. . 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Batstone, W.W. 1993. ‘Logic, rhetoric, and poesis’, Helios 20: 143–72Google Scholar
Batstone, W.W. . 1998. ‘Dry pumice and the programmatic language of Catullus 1’, CPh 93: 125–35Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1987. ‘A complex of times: no more sheep on Romulus’ birthday’, PCPhS 33: 1–15Google Scholar
Beard, M. . 1991. Review of Scheid (1990), TLS (25 October 1991), 7Google Scholar
Bekker, E.I. 1861. Loci Plautini de Rebus Creditis. GreifswaldGoogle Scholar
Bellandi, F. 2007. Lepos e pathos: studi su Catullo. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60. Geburtstag. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Berry, D.H. 1996. Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul, tr. J. van Sickle. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. . 2000. Le orecchie di Hermes: studi di antropologia e letterature classiche. TurinGoogle Scholar
Bickerman, E.J. 1980. Chronology of the Ancient World2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. . 2005. ‘The politics and poetics of geography in the Milan Posidippus, Section One: on stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 119–40Google Scholar
Birt, T. 1882. Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J.D. 1971. ‘Catullus 85: structure, hellenistic parallels and the topos’, Latomus 30: 633–42Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1983. ‘Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics, and the ancient theory of punctuation’, Glotta 61: 48–67Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1982. ‘Die Komödienintrige als Spiel im Spiel’, A&A 28: 131–54Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. 1999. ‘The empty tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past’, ClAnt 18: 187–226Google Scholar
Blondell, R. 2013. Helen of Troy: Beauty, Myth, Devastation. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
Bollème, G. (ed.). 1963. Extraits de le correspondance, ou, Préface à la vie d’écrivain: Gustave Flaubert. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. 1957–8. P. Ovidius Naso: Die Fasten, 2 vols. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. . 1988. ‘Über das zeitliche Verhältnis zwischen den Fasten und den Metamorphosen Ovids’, Gymnasium 95: 207–21Google Scholar
Bonime, F. and Eckardt, M.H. 1993. ‘On psychoanalysing literary characters’, in Berman, E. (ed.), Essential Papers on Literature and Psychoanalysis. New York and London. 202–16Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. LondonGoogle Scholar
Booth, W.C. 1979. ‘Metaphor as rhetoric: the problem of evaluation’, in Sacks (1979). 47–80Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. 1986. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. . 2011. ‘Alcman’s first Partheneion and the song the Sirens sang’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin. 33–65Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. and Thomas, J.D. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). LondonGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. 2004. Juvenal and Persius. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. . 2006. ‘A tale of two cities: Statius, Thebes, and Rome’, Phoenix 60: 259–73Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. 1962. ‘Horace and Varro’, in Brink, C.O. (ed.), Varron, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 9. Geneva. 175–206Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1971. Horace on Poetry: The ‘Ars Poetica’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1982. Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1973. A Commentary on Livy Books XXXI–XXXIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Brodersen, K. (ed.) and Veh, O. (tr.). 1987. Appian von Alexandria. Römische Geschichte, vol. 1. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Brown, E.L. 1963. Numeri Vergiliani: Studies in Eclogues and Georgics. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.D. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura 4.1030–1287. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Brugnoli, G. and Scarcia, R. 1987. ‘Numerologia’, Enciclopedia Virgiliana 3: 790–3Google Scholar
Brunner, T. 1966. ‘The function of the simile in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, CJ 61: 354–63Google Scholar
Brunt, P.A. 1971. Italian Manpower 225 BC–AD 14. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1959. ‘Catulls Dichterkritik in c. 36’, Hermes 87: 309–27Google Scholar
Buck, C.H. 1940. A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.). 2018. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Buffière, F. 1962. Allégories d’Homère: Héraclite. ParisGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Burnett, A.P. 1983. Three Archaic Poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Buxton, R.G.A. 1982. Persuasion in Greek Tragedy: A Study of Peitho. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1969. ‘Catullus 1’, Mnemosyne 22: 153–8Google Scholar
Cairns, F. . 1971. ‘Five “religious” odes of Horace’, AJPh 92: 433–52Google Scholar
Cairns, F. . 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, R. 1990. ‘The psychoanalytic interpretation of Greek myth’, in Edmunds, L. (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth. Baltimore, MD. 344–89Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. 1982. Greek Lyric I: Sappho and Alcaeus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. . 1983. The Golden Lyre: The Themes of the Greek Lyric Poets. LondonGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.A. . 1992. Greek Lyric IV: Bacchylides, Corinna, and Others. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Cantor, P.A. 1976. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Carey, C. 1999. ‘Ethos and Pathos in Bacchylides’, in Pfeijffer, I.L. and Slings, S.R. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Bacchylides. Amsterdam. 17–29Google Scholar
Carter, J. 1996. Appian. The Civil Wars. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Castle, T. 1986. Masquerade and Civilization: The Carnivalesque in Eighteenth-Century English Culture and Fiction. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Castner, C.J. 1988. Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1983. Libri scritture scribi a Ercolano: Introduzione allo studio dei materiali greci. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. . 1999. ‘Between Volumen and Codex’, in Cavallo, G. and Chartier, R. (eds.), A History of Reading in the West, tr. L. G. Cochrane. Amherst, MA. 64–89Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.). 2001. Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. 1984. Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction. Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, J. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. 1975. M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Liber Primus. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forme della comunicazione letteraria. RomeGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 2005. ‘Orazio, Cicerone, e il tempo della letteratura’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 123–39Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2000. Amicizia e potere: nelle lettere di Cicerone e nelle elegie ovidiane dall’esilio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Citti, F. 1994. Orazio. L’invito a Torquato, Epist. 1,5. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento. BariGoogle Scholar
Claes, P. 2002. Concatenatio Catulliana: A New Reading of the Carmina. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. 1994. Virgil: Eclogues. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1983. Il foro romano, periodo arcaico. RomeGoogle Scholar
Colaclides, P. 1981. ‘Odi et amo: une lecture linguistique du c.LXXXV de Catulle’, in Kresic, S. (ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts. Ottawa: 227–33Google Scholar
Coleman, K.M. 1981. ‘The persona of Catullus’ Phaselus’, G&R 28: 68–72Google Scholar
Commager, S. 1962. The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Connors, C. 2004. ‘Monkey business: imitation, authenticity, and identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, ClAnt 23: 179–207Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trs. varii, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, tr. G.W. Most. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 2005. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Contiades-Tsitsoni, E. 1990. Hymenaios und Epithalamion. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D.E. 1986. Metaphor. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Copley, F.O. 1951. ‘Catullus, c.I’, TAPhA 82: 200–6Google Scholar
Corbett, P.B. 1986. The Scurra. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). LondonGoogle Scholar
Costa, C.D.N. 1973. Seneca: Medea. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. 1985. ‘Three poems of Catullus: (1) Poem 62 and its Greek background’, BICS 32: 85–8Google Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1997. ‘Catullus’ yacht (or was it?)’, CJ 92: 113–22Google Scholar
Crews, F. 1993. ‘The unknown Freud’, NYRB (18 November 1993), 55–66Google Scholar
Crews, F. . 1994. ‘The unknown Freud: an exchange’, NYRB (3 February 1994): 34–43Google Scholar
Crews, F. . 1995. The Memory Wars: Freud’s Legacy in Dispute. Frederick Crews and his Critics. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Crook, J.A. 1996. ‘Political history, 30 B.C. to A.D. 14’, CAH 10.70–112Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra Epodi e Sermones. PisaGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. 1980. ‘Prolegomena to a theory of reading’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 46–66Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dalby, A. 1998. ‘Homer’s enemies: lyric and epic in the seventh century’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New Evidence. London. 195–211Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.I. 1982. ‘Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?’, Ethology and Sociobiology 3: 69–78Google Scholar
Damschen, G. 2004. ‘Das lateinische Akrostikon’, Philologus 148: 88–115Google Scholar
Daube, D. 1951. ‘Ne quid infamandi causa fiat: the Roman law of defamation’, in Atti del congresso internazionale di diritto romano e di storia del diritto, 1948. Milan: III.411–50Google Scholar
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.T. 1971. ‘Poetic Counterpoint: Catullus 72’, AJPh 92: 196–201Google Scholar
Deighton, L. 1978. Bomber. LondonGoogle Scholar
Delcourt, A. 2001. ‘Évandre à Rome. Réflexions autour de quatre interprétations de la légende’, Latomus 60: 829–63Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1977. Catullo: le poesie. MilanGoogle Scholar
Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M. 1981. L’Invention de la mythologie. ParisGoogle Scholar
Di Brazzano, S. 1999. ‘Cacata charta: nota a Catull. 36, 1, e a Priap. 69, 4’, MD 43: 179–89Google Scholar
Dingel, J. 1997. Kommentar zum 9. Buch der Aeneis Vergils. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Dinnage, R. 1993. ‘Bringing up Raja’, NYRB (16 December 1993), 66–8Google Scholar
Döpp, S. 1968. Virgilischer Einfluss im Werk Ovids. MunichGoogle Scholar
Dornseiff-Greifswald, F. 1936. ‘Ägyptische Liebeslieder, Hoheslied, Sappho, Theokrit’, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90: 589–601Google Scholar
Douglas, A.E. 1966. Cicero: Brutus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dover, K.J. 1971. Theocritus: Select Poems. LondonGoogle Scholar
Due, O.S. 1974. Changing Forms: Studies in the Metamorphoses of Ovid. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, N. 1995. Aristophanes: Birds. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, K. and van Dorsten, J. (eds.). 1973. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dupont, F. 1976. ‘Signification théâtrale du double dans l’Amphitryon de Plaute’, REL 54: 129–41Google Scholar
Dupont, F. . 1997. ‘Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Princeton, NJ. 44–59Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I.M.LeM. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: the propaganda value of Sermones I’, in Woodman and West (1984). 19–58Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. ‘Callimachus Iamb 4: from performance to writing’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 77–98Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M.J. 1992. ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Leroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI. Brussels. 181–203Google Scholar
Edwards, M.W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume V: books 17–20. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Effe, B. 1978. ‘Die Destruktion der Tradition: Theokrits mythologische Gedichte’, RhM 121: 48–77Google Scholar
Ehlers, W.-W. 1990. ‘Zur Rezitation der Satiren des Persius’, in Kullmann, W. (ed.), Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur. Tübingen. 171–81Google Scholar
Eidinow, J.S.C. 1995. ‘Horace’s Epistle to Torquatus (Ep. 1.5)’, CQ 45: 191–9Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1889. A Commentary on Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Empson, W. 1935. Some Versions of Pastoral. LondonGoogle Scholar
Estré, I.G.F. 1846. Horatiana Prosopographeia. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Fain, G.L. 2008. Writing Epigrams: The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. 1983. ‘Sexual comedy in Ovid’s Fasti: sources and motivations’, HSPh 87: 185–216Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1985. ‘Ovid, Germanicus and the composition of the Fasti’, PLLS 5: 243–81Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1992. ‘The role of Evander in Ovid’s Fasti’, Arethusa 25: 155–71Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1996. Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1998. Ovid: Fasti Book IV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 2010. ‘Discordia fratrum: aspects of Lucan’s conception of civil war’, in Breed, B., Damon, D. and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars. Oxford. 207–19Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2002. ‘Aetiology (in Greek literature)’, Brill’s New Pauly 1.271–4Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Färber, H. 1936. Die Lyrik in der Kunsttheorie der Antike. MunichGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2001. Latin Language and Latin Literature: From Ancient to Modern Times. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2009. ‘The impermanent text in Catullus and other Roman poets’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 164–85Google Scholar
Fauth, W. 1978. ‘Römische Religion im Spiegel der Fasti des Ovid’, ANRW 2.16.1: 104–86Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. 1983. Catullus’ Carmen 61, tr. M. Nardella. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. and Ciccarelli, I. 2008. Q. Horatii Flacci: Carmina Liber IV. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1994. Review of White (1993), BMCR 94.06.16Google Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2003. Review of Depew and Obbink (2000), JRS 93: 337–9Google Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2017. Review of Wiseman (2015), Gnomon 89: 412–18Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2002. ‘Metamorphosis in the Metamorphoses’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 163–79Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2007. ‘The intellectual climate’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA. 92–110Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2011. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Felman, S. 1982. ‘Turning the screw of interpretation’, in Felman, S. (ed.), Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of Reading: Otherwise. Baltimore, MD. 94–207Google Scholar
Felperin, H. 1990. The Uses of the Canon: Elizabethan Literature and Contemporary Theory. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2010. Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and her Community, trs. B. Acosta-Hughes and L. Prauscello. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Finley, M.I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. 1967. Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. LondonGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1988. ‘Power and impotence in Horace’s Epodes’, Ramus 17: 176–91Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. . 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. . 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Flexner, A. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge, with a Companion Essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Flower, H.I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Focke, F. 1923. ‘Synkrisis’, Hermes 58: 327–68Google Scholar
Foley, H.P. 1978. ‘“Reverse similes” and sex roles in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 11: 7–26Google Scholar
Foley, H.P. . 1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, NY and LondonGoogle Scholar
Fontenrose, J.E. 1937. ‘Peirithoos’, RE 19.1: 114–39Google Scholar
Foote, S. 1958–74. The Civil War, a Narrative, 3 vols. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Forbes Irving, P.M.C. 1992. Metamorphosis in Greek Myths. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 1991. ‘Unity in Greek criticism and poetry’, Arion, 3rd ser. 1: 125–54Google Scholar
Fordyce, C.J. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 1989. Review of R.F. Thomas (1988), G&R 36: 235–6Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 1995. ‘Horace and the aesthetics of politics’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 248–66Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 2000. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, P. 1997. ‘Lucretian conclusions’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. 112–38Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. 1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2004. ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R.L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 220–32Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2006. ‘How to tell a myth: genealogy, mythology, mythography’, Kernos 19 [online]Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2012. ‘Written work’, TLS (16 March 2012), 28Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2014. ‘The death of Neoptolemos’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 79–104Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2019. ‘The prehistory of the Roman polis in Dionysius’, in Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. (eds.), Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Cambridge. 180–200Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1955. ‘Vesper adest (Catullus LXII)’, JRS 45: 1–8Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. . 1957. Horace. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Frangoulidis, S.A. 1997. Handlung und Nebenhandlung: Theater, Metatheater und Gattungsbewusstsein in der römischen Komödie. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. 1914. ‘A rejected poem and a substitute: Catullus LXVIII A and B’, AJPh 35: 67–73Google Scholar
Frank, T. . 1920. ‘Catullus and Horace on Suffenus and Alfenus’, CQ 14: 160–2Google Scholar
Frassinetti, P. 1975. Gli Annali di Ennio: inquadramento e versione dei frammenti. GenoaGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J.G. 1913. The Golden Bough. Vol. 9. The Scapegoat3. LondonGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2002. ‘Writing to/through Florus: criticism and the addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2’, Amer. Acad. Rome 47: 33–55Google Scholar
Friedrich, G. 1908. Catulli Veronensis Liber. Leipzig and BerlinGoogle Scholar
Führer, R. 1967. Formproblem-Untersuchungen zu den Reden in der frühgriechischen Lyrik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Fuller, C.J. 1992. The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gaar, E. and Schuster, M. 1930. Auswahl aus römischen Dichtern zur Ergänzung der Vergil- und Horazlektüre. ViennaGoogle Scholar
Gabba, E. 1958. Appian, Bellorum Civilium, Liber Primus. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J.H. 1993. Catullus and his Renaissance Readers. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. 1975. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. . 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. 2006. ‘The rise of fictionality’, in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel. Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture. Princeton, NJ. 336–63Google Scholar
Gamberale, L. 1982. ‘Libri e letteratura nel carme 22 di Catullo’, MD 8: 143–60Google Scholar
Garner, R. 1990. From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1992. The Architext: An Introduction, tr. J.E. Lewin. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, tr. A.T. Cole. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Geymonat, M. 1985. ‘Interpunzione’, Enciclopedia Virgiliana 2.998–1000Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1968. ‘Sympotic literature and epigram’, in Raubitschek, A.E. (ed.), L’Epigramme grecque, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 14. Geneva. 93–177Google Scholar
Gibson, R.K. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2004. ‘Ovid’s Hecale: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses’, JRS 94: 47–72Google Scholar
Glinski, M.L. von. 2012. Simile and Identity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. 1995. Catullus: Poems 61–68. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. . 1999. Catullus: The Shorter Poems. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Gold, B.K. 1992. ‘Openings in Horace’s Satires and Odes; poet, patron, and audience’, YClS 29: 161–85Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. 1995a. Epic in Republican Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. . 1995b. ‘Improvisation, plot, and Plautus’ Curculio’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 33–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. . 1998. ‘Plautus on the Palatine’, JRS 88: 1–20Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1986. Reading Greek Tragedy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994a. ‘The failure of exemplarity’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 51–73Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994b. ‘The naïve and knowing eye: ecphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge. 197–223Google Scholar
Gomme, A.W. and Sandbach, F.H. 1973. Menander: A Commentary. LondonGoogle Scholar
Goold, G.P. 1983. Catullus. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.S. and Gordon, A.E. 1957. Contribution to the Study of Latin Inscriptions. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. . 2009. ‘The ends of the beginning: Horace, Satires I’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 39–60.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. . 2012. Horace: Satires Book 1. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A.M. 1992. The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A.M. . 2013. ‘Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the imperial period’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge. 233–50Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1988. ‘Ovide, les Métamorphoses et la véracité du mythe’, in Calame, C. (ed.), Métamorphoses du mythe en Grèce antique. Geneva. 57–70Google Scholar
Graf, F. . 1992. ‘Römische Aitia und ihre Riten. Das Beispiel von Saturnalia und Parilia’. MH 49: 13–25Google Scholar
Gransden, K.W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid Book 8. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. 1924. ‘Cicero’s Orator and Horace’s Ars Poetica’, HSPh 35: 1–74Google Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. . 1929. Cicero’s De Oratore and Horace’s Ars Poetica. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. 1982. ‘Drama’, CHCL 2.77–137Google Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. . 1991. ‘Catullus 1.10 and the title of his libellus’, G&R 38: 199–202Google Scholar
Graves, R. 1957. Suetonius: The Twelve Caesars. LondonGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009. ‘Horace, Suetonius, and the Lives of the Greek poets’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 140–60Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2009. ‘Greek lyric and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge. 95–113Google Scholar
Green, S.J. 2004. Ovid, Fasti 1: A Commentary. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1984. ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 189–218Google Scholar
Griffin, J. . 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. LondonGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. . 1993. ‘Horace in the thirties’, in Rudd (1993). 1–22Google Scholar
Griffith, J.G. 1983. ‘Catullus, Poem 4: a neglected interpretation revived’, Phoenix 37: 123–8Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1983. Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A. 1972. ‘Alcman’s Partheneion: the morning after the night before’, QUCC 14: 7–30Google Scholar
Gross, K. 2006. Shylock is Shakespeare. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E.S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. . 1993. Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CTGoogle Scholar
Günther, L.-M. 1989. ‘Hannibal im Exil’, in Devijver, H. and Lipinski, E. (eds.), Studia Phoenica X: The Punic Wars. Leiden. 241–50Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2002. ‘Art’s echo: the tradition of Hellenistic ecphrastic epigram’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. (eds.), Hellenistic Epigrams. Leiden. 85–112Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. . (ed.). 2005. The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. 1985. The Colometry of Latin Prose. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hague, R. 1983. ‘Ancient Greek wedding songs: the tradition of praise’, Journal of Folklore Research 20: 131–43Google Scholar
Hall, E. 2008. ‘Is the “Barcelona Alcestis” a Latin pantomime libretto?’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford. 258–82Google Scholar
Hall, J.B. 1982. Review of Alton-Wormell-Courtney (ed. 1, 1978), PACA 16: 68–76Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. 1993. ‘Plautine ingredients in the performance of the Pseudolus’, CW 87: 21–6Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 1986. Aristotle’s Poetics. LondonGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1987. The Poetics of Aristotle: Translation and Commentary. LondonGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1989. Review of Heath (1987), JHS 109: 231Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1992. ‘Pleasure, understanding, and emotion in Aristotle’s Poetics’, in Rorty, A.O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton, NJ. 241–60Google Scholar
Halperin, D.M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Sexuality, and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D.B. 1990. Virgil and “The Tempest”: The Politics of Imitation. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Hampton, C. 1983. Tales from Hollywood. London and Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. 1998. ‘Horace, the paean and Roman choreia (Odes 4.6)’, PLLS 10: 251–93Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1991. ‘The Janus episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, MD 26: 47–64Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993a. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993b. ‘Vt pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’, in Rudd (1993). 120–39Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2002a. ‘Another look at Virgil’s Ganymede’, in Wiseman, T.P. (ed.), Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. London. 333–61Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2002b. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. (ed.). 2002c. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2015. Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume VI (Libri XIII–XV). MilanGoogle Scholar
Harmon, D.P. 1970. ‘Catullus 72.3–4’, CJ 65: 321–2Google Scholar
Harrauer, H. 1979. A Bibliography to Catullus. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Harries, B. 1989. ‘Causation and the authority of the poet in Ovid’s Fasti’, CQ 39: 164–85Google Scholar
Harries, B. . 1991. ‘Ovid and the Fabii: Fasti 2.193–474’, CQ 41: 150–68Google Scholar
Harries, K. 1979. ‘Metaphor and transcendence’, in Sacks (1979). 71–88Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. 2006. ‘A revisionist view of Roman money’, JRS 96: 1–24Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. . (ed.). 2008. The Monetary Systems of the Greeks and Romans. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, B. 1991. Inconvenient Fictions: Literature and the Limits of Theory. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E.L. 1984. ‘The Aeneid and Carthage’, in Woodman and West (1984). 95–115Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. 1990. ‘The praise singer: Horace, Censorinus and Odes 4.8’, JRS 80: 31–43Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . (ed.). 1995. Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 2008. ‘Horace Epistles 2: the last Horatian book of Sermones?’, PLLS 13: 173–86Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. and Heyworth, S.J. 1998. ‘Notes on the text and interpretation of Catullus’, PCPhS 44: 85–109Google Scholar
Hartz, C. 2007. Catulls Epigramme im Kontext hellenistischer Dichtung. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R.A. 1981. A Commentary on Persius. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Haupt, M. 1837. Quaestiones Catullianae. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. 1987. The Poetics of Greek Tragedy. LondonGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. . 1988. ‘Catullus 68B’, LCM 13: 117–19Google Scholar
Heath, M. . 1989. Unity in Greek Poetics. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. 1960. Vom Geist des Römertums: Ausgewählte Aufsätze3, ed. Burck, E.. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Helzle, M. 1989. Publii Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber IV: A Commentary on Poems 1 to 7 and 16. Zürich and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991. ‘Persius’ didactic satire: the pupil as teacher’, Ramus 20: 123–48Google Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 2001. Telling Tales on Caesar: Roman Stories from Phaedrus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. 1873–92. Aeneidea, 4 vols. Dublin and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hersch, K. 2010. The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Herter, H. 1934. ‘Telemachos’, RE 2R 9: 325–57Google Scholar
Heslin, P. 2005. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ Achilleid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. . 2011. ‘Metapoetic pseudonyms in Horace, Propertius and Ovid’, JRS 101: 51–72Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. 1994. ‘Some allusions to Callimachus in Latin poetry’, MD 33: 51–79Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2001. ‘Catullian Iambics, Catullian Iambi’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 117–40Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2007a. Properti Elegi. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2007b. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. The Classical Tradition: Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. 1985. ‘Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1’, PCPhS 31: 13–32Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987a. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987b. ‘Generalising about Ovid’, Ramus 16: 4–31Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1992. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti—Part I: Genre and Mannerism; Part II: Genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan Ideology’, Arethusa 25: 81–153Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2006. ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: towards the limits of etymologizing interpretation’, Dictynna 3: 173–208Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2010. ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford. 369–85Google Scholar
Hodgman, W. 1924. ‘Latin equivalents of punctuation marks’, CJ 19: 403–17Google Scholar
Hofmann, J.B. and Szantyr, A. 1965. Lateinische Grammatik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hollander, D.B. 2007. Money in the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A.S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry c.60 BC–AD 20. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Holoka, J.P. 1985. Gaius Valerius Catullus: A Systematic Bibliography. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2000. ‘Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: “Womanufacture” in Catullus’, PCPhS 46: 28–44Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2002a. Martial und das antike Epigramm. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2002b. Catull: Der Dichter und sein erotisches Werk. MunichGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. . 2014. Vergil: 3. Aeneis. Eine Bibliographie. MunichGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, K. . 1991. ‘From violence to blessing: symbols and rituals in ancient Rome’, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J. (eds.), City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor, MI. 479–98Google Scholar
Hordern, J.H. 2002. The Fragments of Timotheus of Miletus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, R.A. 1963. ‘The craft of Catullus (carm. 4)’, AJPh 84: 256–65Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. 1976. ‘The Collegium Poetarum’, BICS 23: 79–95Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1983. ‘Some problems in the “Laudatio Turiae”’, BICS 30: 85–98Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1989. Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1993. ‘Empty shelves on the Palatine’, G&R 40: 58–67Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2003a. The Culture of the Roman Plebs. LondonGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 2003b. Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, S. 2004. Das Epithalamium in der lateinischen Literatur der Spätantike. MunichGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. 2013. ‘From Ecloga the Mime to Vergil’s Eclogues as Mimes: Ein Gedankenspiel’, Vergilius 59: 37–60Google Scholar
Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.). 2009. Perceptions of Horace: A Poet and his Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Housman, A.E. 1972. The Classical Papers of A.E. Housman, eds. Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F.R.D.. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Houston, G.W. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Howell, P. 1980. A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. 1973. ‘The Odes’, in Horace, ed. Costa, C.D.N.. London. 1–28Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1974. Propertius. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1975. ‘The capture of Silenus’, PCPhS n.s. 21: 53–62Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1995. ‘Pindarici fontis qui non expalluit haustus: Horace, Epistles I.3’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 219–27Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1984. ‘Catullus 68: the text as self-demystification’, Arethusa 17: 29–49Google Scholar
Hunter, G.K. 1977. ‘A Roman thought: Renaissance attitudes to history exemplified in Shakespeare and Jonson’, in Lee, B.S. (ed.), An English Miscellany: Presented to W.S. Mackie. Cape Town, London and New York. 93–118Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1985. ‘Horace on friendship and free speech: Epistles 1.18 and Satires 1.4’, Hermes 113: 480–90Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1992. ‘Writing the god: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’, MD 29: 9–34Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.). 2017. Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2002. ‘The new Posidippus and Latin poetry’, ZPE 138: 1–10Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2003. ‘The Aetia: Callimachus’ poem of knowledge’, ZPE 145: 47–59Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2010. ‘Deflected addresses: apostrophe and space (Sophocles, Aeschines, Plautus, Cicero, Virgil and others)’, CQ 60: 96–109Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2012. ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge. 48–78Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks & Contexts for Intertextuality. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2010. A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. 2006. ‘Commentario al Libro X’, in Quinto Ennio, Annali (Libri IX-XVIII): Commentari. Naples. 141–282Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: metus hostilis and the fall of Rome in the Punica’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 123–39Google Scholar
Jacques, J.-M. 1960. ‘Sur un acrostiche d’Aratos’, REA 62: 48–61Google Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La Guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale. ParisGoogle Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. ‘When the Lamp is Shattered’: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and Edwardsville, ILGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L. (ed.). 2014. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jebb, R.C. 1905. Bacchylides: The Poems and Fragments. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, T.E. 2005. ‘At play with writing: letters and readers in Plautus’, TAPhA 135: 359–92Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1982. Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal. LondonGoogle Scholar
Jenott, L. 2010. The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of the ‘Betrayer’s Gospel’. Diss. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H.D. 1979. ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus Vita Vergilii 44)’, PLLS 2: 67–142Google Scholar
Johnson, T.S. 2004. A Symposion of Praise: Horace Returns to Lyric in Odes IV. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.A. 2009. ‘The ancient book’, in Bagnall, R.S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford. 256–81Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. and Parker, H.N. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. 1982. The Idea of Lyric: Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. . 1993. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. 1971. Scenic Form in Shakespeare. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. . 1977. The Origins of Shakespeare. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jong, I.J.F. de and Sullivan, J.P. (eds.). 1994. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. 1999. The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero. LondonGoogle Scholar
Karlin, D. 1993. Review of Parkes (1993), LRB (7 January 1993), 15Google Scholar
Kaster, R.A. 1995. Suetonius: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R.A. . 2011. Macrobius: Saturnalia. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. (eds.). forthcoming. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S.T. 1982. ‘The shackles of forgetfulness: Horace, C., 4, 7’, Latomus 41: 815–16Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. 1987. Review of H.-P. Stahl, Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’ (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1985), LCM 12: 72–7Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1989. Review of Hinds (1987a) and Knox (1986), JRS 79: 209–10Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1992. ‘“Augustan” and “anti-Augustan”: reflections on terms of reference’, in A. Powell (1992). 26–58Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. 1989a. ‘Ancient antecedents of modern literary theory’, AJPh 110: 492–8Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1989b. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. 1: Classical Criticism. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1991. ‘Heath on Unity and Daitz’s Living Voice’, AJPh 112: 115–18Google Scholar
Kenner, H. 1968. The Counterfeiters: An Historical Comedy. Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. 1971. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book III. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. . 1982. ‘Books and readers in the Roman world’, CHCL 2.3–32Google Scholar
Kerkhecker, A. 1999. Callimachus’ Book of Iambi. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kermode, F. 1983. Essays on Fiction: 1971–82. LondonGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, J. 1986. Shakespeare: The Sonnets; and, A Lover’s Complaint. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. 1997. Aratus: Phaenomena. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, A. 1868. ‘Zur Kritik und Erklärung des Plautinischen Pseudolus’, RhM 23: 411–26Google Scholar
Kiessling, A., rev. Heinze, R. 1921. Q. Horatius Flaccus: Satiren5. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E.F. 1987. Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1950a. Horatius: Opera. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. . 1950b. ‘Horazens Brief an Augustus’, SBAW, Heft 5. MunichGoogle Scholar
Kloft, H. 1984. ‘Aspekte der Prinzipatsideologie im frühen Prinzipat’, Gymnasium 91: 306–26Google Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. and Foss, C. (eds.). 1998. Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Kohn, T. 1998. ‘Aeneid 6. 713–23: who is speaking?’, Vergilius 44: 28–30Google Scholar
Kolendo, J. 1981. ‘La répartition des places aux spectacles et la stratification sociale dans l’Empire Romain: à propos des inscriptions sur les gradins des amphithéâtres et théâtres’, Ktèma 6: 301–15Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.). 2013. Ancient Libraries. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, D. 2009. ‘Horace, Pindar and the Censorini in Odes 4.8’, JRS 99: 23–35Google Scholar
Kramer, L.S. 1989. ‘Literature, criticism, and historical imagination: the literary challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra’, in Hunt, L. (ed.), The New Cultural History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 97–128Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. 1994. Livy: Ab Urbe Condita. Book VI. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1998. ‘Repetition and empire in the Ab Urbe Condita’, in Knox and Foss (1998). 264–83Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. and Woodman, A.J. 1997. Latin Historians. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W. . 1959. Catull3. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B.A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre3, rev. A. Thierfelder. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1938. ‘Hat Linkomies’ Auffassung der vierten Ekloge wirklich dem Räselraten eine Ende bereitet?’, PhW 58: 812–16Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1999. Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, A. 2005. ‘Cabinet fit for a queen: the λιθικά as Posidippus’ gem museum’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 141–63Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1963. Orazio e l’ideologia del principato. TurinGoogle Scholar
La Penna, A. . 1972. ‘Sunt qui Sappho malint. Note sulla σύγκρισις di Saffo e Alceo nell’antichità’, Maia 24: 208–15Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1981. Orazio: Satire. MilanGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. . 1984. L’arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell’ elegia ovidiana. PisaGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. . 2005. ‘Poetica minore e minima: Mecenate e gli amici nelle Satire di Orazio’, MD 54: 47–63Google Scholar
Labate, M. . 2010. Passato remoto: età mitiche e identità augustea in Ovidio. PisaGoogle Scholar
Lada, I. 1993. ‘“Empathic understanding”: emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPhS 39: 94–140Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1993. ‘Sounding out ekphrasis: art and text in Catullus 64’, JRS 83: 18–30Google Scholar
Lambert, A. 1946. Die indirekte Rede als künstlerisches Stilmittel des Livius. ZürichGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M. 1981. Dickens and the Suspended Quotation. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1997. ‘Plutarch and the Romanizations of Athens’, in Hoff, M.C. and Rotroff, S.I. (eds.), The Romanizations of Athens. Oxford. 151–60Google Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 2015. ‘Herders’ graffiti’, in Matthaiou, A.P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), AXON: Studies in Honor of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens. 49–58Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2008. ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: the case of seueritas’, CCJ 54: 160–87Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. 2001. ‘Keening Sappho: female speech genres in Sappho’s poetry’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton, NJ. 75–92Google Scholar
Latta, B. 1972. ‘Zu Catulls Carmen 1’, MH 29: 201–13Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1960. Römische Religionsgeschichte. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. 1961. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. . 1967. The Odyssey of Homer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1990. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft3. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, M. 1982. Das Einzeldistichon: Studien zum antiken Epigramm. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E.T. and McCauley, R.N. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, J.F. 1978. Hannibal’s War: A Military History of the Second Punic War. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. 1990. The Poems of Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1977. ‘Plautus-Studien I, der doppelte Geldkreislauf im Pseudolus’, Hermes 105: 441–54Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1988. ‘Die grosse Florus-Epistel des Horaz (2.2). Der Schwanengesang der augusteischen Dichtung’, in Binder, G. (ed.), Saeculum Augustum II. Darmstadt. 342–59Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1997. Plautus’ Pseudolus. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Leigh, M. 1997. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Leo, F. 1901. Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. A History of Greek Literature, trs. J. Willis and C. de Heer. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. 2010. Livy on the Hannibalic War. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Libby, B. 2010. ‘Poetic and imperial authority in Phaedrus’ Fables’, CQ 60: 545–58Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1958. ‘L’ordinamento ed i reciproci rapporti dei carmi maggiori di Catullo’, RFIC 86: 23–47Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. . 1962. Puella divina. Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull im Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. 1979. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. . 1985. Review of Price (1984), JRS 75: 262–4Google Scholar
Lipovsky, J. 1981. A Historiographical Study of Livy, Books VI–X. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1987. Un Flot d’images: une esthétique du banquet grec. ParisGoogle Scholar
Litchfield, H.W. 1914. ‘National Exempla Virtutis in Roman literature’, HSPh 25: 1–71Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. 2002. ‘Integer ipse? Self-knowledge and self-presentation in Persius Satires 4’, Phoenix 56: 56–83Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. 1975. ‘Ovid’s Lupercalia (Fasti 2.267–452): a study in the artistry of the Fasti’, Latomus 34: 1060–72Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. . 1981. ‘Poetic artistry and dynastic politics: Ovid at the Ludi Megalenses (Fasti 4.179–372)’, CQ 31: 381–95Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. . 2006. A Commentary on Ovid’s Fasti, Book 6. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (ed.). 2003. Credito e moneta nel mondo romano. Atti degli Incontri capresi di storia dell’economia antica (Capri 12–14 ottobre 2000). BariGoogle Scholar
Loehr, J. 1996. Ovids Mehrfacherklärungen in der Tradition aitiologischen Dichtens. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Logan, G.M. 1976. ‘Lucan—Daniel—Shakespeare: new light on the relation between The Civil Wars and Richard II’, Shakespeare Studies 9: 121–40Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. 2007. ‘Catullus and Martial’, in Skinner, M.B (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton. 418–38Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2010. ‘Cannibalising history: Livian moments in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 71–86Google Scholar
Lowe, J.C.B. 1962. ‘The manuscript evidence for changes of speaker in Aristophanes’, BICS 9: 27–42Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2002. ‘Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the poet statesman at Epistles 2.1.256’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 158–71Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2006. ‘Hic and absence in Catullus 68’, CPh 101: 115–32Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Luce, T.J. 1990. ‘Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum’, in Raaflaub, K.A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 123–38Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1990. ‘The origin and development of the Catullan style in Neo-Latin poetry’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O. (eds.), Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Oxford. 183–97Google Scholar
Lundstrom, S. 1980. Ovids Metamorphosen und die Politik des Kaisers. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Lupton, E. (ed.). 1998. Period Styles: A History of Punctuation2. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2001. ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford. 138–60Google Scholar
Lyghounis, M.G. 1991. ‘Elementi tradizionali nella poesia nuziale greca’, MD 27: 159–98Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets from Catullus to Horace. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 2007. Collected Papers on Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
MacCabe, C. 1988. ‘Language, linguistics and the study of literature’, in Lodge, D. (ed.), Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. London and New York. 432–44Google Scholar
McCall, M.H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, M.W. 1910. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and their Background. London and MelbourneGoogle Scholar
McDermott, E.A. 1981. ‘Greek and Roman elements in Horace’s lyric program’, ANRW 2.31.3: 1640–72Google Scholar
Macintyre, A. 1970. ‘The idea of a social science’, in Wilson, B.R. (ed.), Rationality. Oxford. 112–30Google Scholar
McKeon, M. 1987. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
McKeown, J.C. 1984. ‘Fabula proposito nulla tegenda meo: Ovid’s Fasti and Augustan politics’, in Woodman and West (1984). 169–87Google Scholar
McKeown, J.C. . 1987. Ovid: Amores. Vol. 1. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C.W. 1974. ‘A use of myth in ancient poetry’, CQ 24: 82–93Google Scholar
Macleod, C.W. . 1982. Homer: Iliad XXIV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
McNamee, K. 1992. Sigla and Select Marginalia in Greek Literary Papyri. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
McNeill, R.B. 2001. Horace: Image, Identity and Audience. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Maehler, H. 1982. Die Lieder des Bakchylides, I: Die Siegeslieder, 2 vols. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Maine, H.S. 1861. Ancient Law, in Connection with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas. LondonGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. LeedsGoogle Scholar
Mangelsdorff, E.A. 1913. Das lyrische Hochzeitsgedicht bei den Griechen und Römern. HamburgGoogle Scholar
Mankin, D. 1995. Horace: Epodes. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marrou, H.I. 1956. A History of Education in Antiquity, tr. G. Lamb. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C.W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. 1985. ‘A reconsideration of Ovid’s Fasti’, ICS 10: 261–74Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1998. Aratos: Phénomènes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993a. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. . 1993b. ‘Descent into hell: reading ambiguity, or Virgil and the critics’, PVS 21: 111–50Google Scholar
Martindale, C. . 2004. ‘Shakespeare and Virgil’, in Martindale, C. and Taylor, A.B. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge. 89–106Google Scholar
Martindale, C. and Martindale, M. 1990. Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
May, J.M. 1990. ‘The monologistic dialog as a method of literary criticism’, Athenaeum 78: 177–80Google Scholar
Mayer, R. 1994. Horace: Epistles Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. . 1995a. ‘Graecia capta: the Roman reception of Greek literature’, PLLS 8: 289–307Google Scholar
Mayer, R. . 1995b. ‘Horace’s Moyen de Parvenir’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 279–95Google Scholar
Meltzer, F. 1990. ‘Unconscious’, in Lentricchia, F. and McLaughlin, T. (eds.), Critical Terms for Literary Study. Chicago, IL. 147–63Google Scholar
Merli, E. 2000. Arma canant alii: Materia epica e narrazione elegiaca nei fasti di Ovidio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Mette, H.J. 1962. ‘Catull Carm. 4’, RhM 105: 153–7Google Scholar
Meyer, E.A. 2001. ‘Wooden wit: tabellae in Latin poetry’, in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-Five Years at Yale. New Haven, CT. 201–12Google Scholar
Meyer, E.A. . 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, A.N. 1999. ‘Etymologising on common nouns in Catullus’, Emerita 67: 127–45Google Scholar
Miles, G.B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. 1977. The Emperor in the Roman World (31 BC–AD 337). Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. 1985. Ovid, Fasti II. Bryn Mawr, PAGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1991. Ovid’s Elegiac Festivals. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1992. ‘The Fasti and Hellenistic didactic: Ovid’s variant aetiologies’, Arethusa 25: 11–31Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1993. ‘Ovidian Allusion and the Vocabulary of Memory’, MD 30: 153–64Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 2009. Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.). 2010. Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Miller, P.A. 1994. Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J.F. 1966. ‘The Torquati’, Historia 15: 23–31Google Scholar
Moeller, P. 1912. Deos consiliantes qua ratione Lucilius in libro primo aliique effinxerint. Diss. WeimarGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. 1993. ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS 39: 141–68Google Scholar
Moles, J. . 2002a. ‘Poetry, philosophy, politics and play: Epistles I’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 141–57Google Scholar
Moles, J. . 2002b. ‘Reconstructing Plancus (Horace, C. 1.7)’, JRS 92: 86–109Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1942. Review of L. Robinson, Freedom of Speech in the Roman Republic (Baltimore, MD, 1940), JRS 32: 120–4Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. 1998. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J.R. 1993. ‘Make-believe and make believe: the fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter. 175–229Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Muecke, F. 1986. ‘Plautus and the theater of disguise’, ClAnt 5: 216–29Google Scholar
Muecke, F. . 1993. Horace: Satires II. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Muecke, F. . 1995. ‘Law, rhetoric, and genre in Horace, Satires 2.1’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 203–18Google Scholar
Müller, R.W. 1964. Rhetorische und syntaktische Interpunktion. Untersuchungen zur Pausenbezeichnung im antiken Latein. Diss. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Münzer, F. 1905. ‘Atticus als Geschichtsschreiber’, Hermes 40: 50–100Google Scholar
Münzer, F. . 1928. ‘Manlius’, RE 14.1: 1149–226Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1985. ‘Symposium and genre in the poetry of Horace’, JRS 75: 39–50Google Scholar
Myers, K.S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Myers, K.S. . 2009. Ovid: Metamorphoses Book XIV. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. 1958. C. Valerii Catulli Carmina. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nagle, B.R. 1980. The Poetics of Exile: Program and Polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto of Ovid. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. 2001. Aspects of Catullus’ Social Fiction. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R.R. 1994. ‘Historicizing reading: the aesthetics of reception and Horace’s “Soracte Ode”’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 207–30Google Scholar
Needham, R. 1972. Belief, Language and Experience. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Neudling, C.L. 1955. A Prosopography to Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. 1992. ‘Ovid’s narrator in the Fasti’, Arethusa 25: 33–54Google Scholar
Newlands, C. . 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. . 2002. ‘Mandati Memores: political and poetic authority in the Fasti’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 200–16Google Scholar
Newman, J.K. 1967a. Augustus and the New Poetry. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. . 1967b. The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Newman, J.K. . 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Newsom, R. 1988. A Likely Story: Probability and Play in Fiction. New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. 1961. Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1987. ‘Pyrrha among roses: real life and poetic imagination in Augustan Rome’, review of Griffin (1985), JRS 77: 184–90Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1995. Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.J.. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2002. ‘A wine-jar for Messalla: Carmina 3.21’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 80–92Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2007. ‘Horace: life and chronology’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge. 7–21Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book 1. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hubbard, M. . 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Norden, E. 1927. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis Buch VI3. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
North, J.A. 2008. ‘Caesar at the Lupercalia’, JRS 98: 144–60Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. . 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, J.H. and Sinos, R.H. 1993. The Wedding in Ancient Athens. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume II: Books VII and VIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. . 2005. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume IV: Book X. OxfordGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1996. ‘Vergil’s best reader? Ovidian commentary on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 91: 255–76Google Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. . 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1991. ‘Canidia, Canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s Epodes’, Arethusa 24: 107–38Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 1995. ‘Life after publication: Horace, Epistles 1.20’, Arethusa 28: 209–24Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. Abingdon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Önnerfors, A. 1974. Vaterporträts in der römischen Poesie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Horaz, Statius und Ausonius. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Otis, B. 1963. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Otto, A. 1890. Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Page, D. 1955. Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Page, D. . 1962. Poetae Melici Graeci. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. 1879. ‘On Ellis’s Catullus’, Hermathena 3: 293–363Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. 2007. ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus’ wedding poems’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Oxford. 276–92Google Scholar
Paoli, U.E. 1932. ‘Note di filologia reale su Catullo, Orazio, Marziale’, SIFC 10: 33–7Google Scholar
Paratore, E. 1963. ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti fra Catullo e gli epigrammisti dell’ «Antologia»’, in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni. Turin: 562–87Google Scholar
Parker, H.N. 2009. ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 186–229Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2011. On Greek Religion. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Parkes, M.B. 1993. Pause and Effect: Punctuation in the West. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Parsons, P.J., Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hutchinson, G.O. 1983. ‘Alcestis in Barcelona’, ZPE 52: 31–6Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. 2006. Founding the Year: Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of the Roman Calendar. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Pascucci, G. 1961. ‘Il nome di Pseudolus’, A&R 6: 30–4Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. 1920. Orazio lirico. Florence (repr. 1964)Google Scholar
Paukstadt, R. 1876. De Martiale Catulli Imitatore. Diss. HalleGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2018. ‘Fidelity and farewell: Pindar’s ethics as textual events’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018). 257–74Google Scholar
Pease, A.S. 1935. P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Pederson, J. 1984. The Arabic Book, tr. G. French. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1986. ‘Qui potis est, inquis? Audience roles in Catullus’, Arethusa 19: 187–209Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. 1988. Plutarch: Life of Antony. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R . 2009. ‘Seeing a Roman tragedy through Greek eyes: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar’, in Hall, E. and Goldhill, S. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Tragic Tradition. Cambridge. 264–88Google Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Perowne, S. 1968. Roman Mythology. LondonGoogle Scholar
Petrain, D. 2005. ‘Gems, metapoetics, and value: Greek and Roman responses to a third-century discourse on precious stones’, TAPhA 135: 329–57Google Scholar
Petrochilos, N.K. 1974. Roman Attitudes to the Greeks. AthensGoogle Scholar
Petrone, G. 1983. Teatro antico e inganno: finzione plautine. PalermoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pfeijffer, I.L. 2004. ‘Pindar and Bacchylides’, in de Jong, I.J.F., Nunlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden. 213–32Google Scholar
Phillips, C.R. 1983. ‘Rethinking Augustan poetry’, Latomus 42: 780–818Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2006. ‘Making an impression: replication and the ontology of the Graeco-Roman seal stone’, Art History 29: 233–57Google Scholar
Podlecki, A.J. 1969. ‘The Peripatetics as literary critics’, Phoenix 23: 114–37Google Scholar
Poovey, M. 2008. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Porte, D. 1985. L’Étiologie religieuse dans les Fastes d’Ovide. ParisGoogle Scholar
Porter, D. 1972. ‘Violent juxtaposition in the similes of the Iliad’, CJ 68: 11–21Google Scholar
Possanza, D.M. 2004. Translating the Heavens: Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. (ed.). 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. BristolGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. . 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. and Welch, K. (eds.). 2002. Sextus Pompeius. Swansea and LondonGoogle Scholar
Powell, B.B. 2002. Writing and the Origins of Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. 1988. Cicero: Cato Maior De Senectute. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. . 1990. Cicero: On Friendship and the Dream of Scipio. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. . 1990. ‘The future of dreams: from Freud to Artemidoros’, in Halperin, D.M., Winkler, J.J. and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds.), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton, NJ. 365–87Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1995. ‘On the sacking of Carthage and Corinth’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford. 133–48Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. 1968. ‘Catullus 22, 13’, Hermes 96: 552–8Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 2006. ‘Horace to Torquatus: Epistle 1.5 and Ode 4.7’, AJPh 127: 387–413Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. . 2006. ‘The tragedy of nobility on the seventeenth-century stage’, Modern Language Quarterly 67: 7–29Google Scholar
Quint, D. . 2008. William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rafti, P. 1988. ‘L’interpunzione nel libro manoscritto: mezzo secolo di studi’, S&C 12: 239–98Google Scholar
Ramage, E.S. 1973. Urbanitas: Ancient Sophistication and Refinement. Norman, OKGoogle Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. . 1991. ‘Discrimina ordinum: the lex Julia theatralis’, in Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers, 508–45. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ready, J.L. 2004. ‘A binding song: the similes of Catullus 61’, CPh 99: 153–63Google Scholar
Reardon, B.P. (ed.). 1989. Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Reden, S. von. 1995. Exchange in Ancient Greece. LondonGoogle Scholar
Reed, J.D. 2013. Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume V (Libri X–XII). MilanGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. 1995. ‘Conclusion’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M.D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Spoleto. 497–511Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2002. ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 3.931–71’, CQ 52: 291–304Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. 1933. M. Agrippa. Geneva, NYGoogle Scholar
Reitz, C. and Walter, A. (eds.). 2014. Von Ursachen sprechen. Eine aitiologische Spurensuche/Telling Origins. On the Lookout for Aetiology. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. 1963. Aufsätze zu Horaz. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L.D. and Wilson, N.G. 1974. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.H. 2012. The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1995. ‘The Roman mind and the power of fiction’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformations of Classical Traditions Presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, NJ. 117–30Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. 1985. ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’, PLLS 5: 383–401Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. . 1994. ‘Aristotle and Hellenistic scholarship’, in Montanari, F. (ed.), La Philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 40. Geneva. 7–28Google Scholar
Ricks, C. 1963. Milton’s Grand Style. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language, tr. R. Czerny. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. 2007. Ion, or, On the Iliad: Plato. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. 2011. A Commentary on Ovid’s Fasti, Book 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Robson, A.G. 1972. ‘Catullus 68:53: the coherence and force of tradition’, TAPhA 103: 433–9Google Scholar
Robson, J. 2007. ‘Catullus 22: Suffenus iste—a Catullan riddle?’, C&M 58: 209–14Google Scholar
Roca-Puig, R. 1982. Alcestis. Hexàmetres Llatins. Papyri Barcinonenses, Inv. n.° 158–161. BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91: 113–45Google Scholar
Roman, L. . 2006. ‘A history of lost tablets’, ClAnt 25: 351–88Google Scholar
Ronan, C.J. 1988. ‘Lucan and the self-incised voids of Julius Caesar’, Comparative Drama 22: 215–26Google Scholar
Rosebury, B. 1988. Art and Desire: A Study in the Aesthetics of Fiction. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R.M. 2000. ‘Cratinus’ Pytine and the construction of the comic self’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London. 23–39Google Scholar
Rosen, R.M. . 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T.G. 1969. The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica 12: 283–319Google Scholar
Ross, D.O. Jr. 1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Ross, D.O. . 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C.J. 1987. ‘Platonic irony’, Noua Tellus 5: 83–101Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1966. The Satires of Horace. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1976. Lines of Enquiry: Studies in Latin Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1982. ‘Horace’, CHCL 2: 370–404Google Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1989. Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.). 1993. Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium. BristolGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. 2002. ‘A total write-off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the rhetoric of comic competition’, CQ 52: 138–63Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1967. ‘Rhetoric and criticism’, G&R n.s. 14: 130–44Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1979. ‘De Imitatione’, in West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 1–16Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. LondonGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1989. The Place of Poetry in Ancient Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.A. and Winterbottom, M. 1989. Classical Literary Criticism2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, K.K. 1969. The Conceit. LondonGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, K.K. . 1979. Critical Assumptions. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Sacks, S. (ed.). 1979. On Metaphor. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Saenger, P. 1997. Space Between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Sage, V. 1988. Horror Fiction in the Protestant Tradition. LondonGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. 2005. ‘Framing the debate over growth in the ancient economy’, in Manning, J.G. and Morris, I. (eds.), The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models. Stanford, CA. 223–38Google Scholar
Salzman, M. 1998. ‘Deification in the Fasti and the Metamorphoses’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 9. Brussels. 313–46Google Scholar
Santirocco, M. 1995. ‘Horace and Augustan ideology’, Arethusa 28: 225–43Google Scholar
Sarkissian, J. 1983. Catullus 68. An Interpretation. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Scarpat, G. 1964. Parrhesia. Storia del termine e delle sue traduzioni in latino. BresciaGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, E. 1966. Das Verhältnis von Erlebnis und Kunstgestalt bei Catull. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Schanzer, E. 1956. Shakespeare’s Appian: A Selection from the Tudor Translation of Appian’s Civil Wars. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. RomeGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. . 1992. ‘Myth, cult and reality in Ovid’s Fasti’, PCPhS 38: 118–31Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009a. ‘Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective’, in Morris, I. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium. Oxford. 255–324Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. . 2009b. ‘When did Livy write Books 1, 3, 28 and 59?’, CQ 59: 653–8Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2005. ‘Under the sign of Saturn: Dido’s Kulturkampf’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 85–110Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace’s Satires, Book 1, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Schmeling, G.L. 1980. Xenophon of Ephesus. Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. 1972. Poetische Reflexion: Vergils Bukolik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1977. ‘Amica uis pastoribus: der Iambiker Horaz in seinem Epodenbuch’, Gymnasium 84: 401–23Google Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1991. Ovids poetische Menschenwelt: Die Metamorphosen als Metapher und Symphonie. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1902. ‘Griechische Personennamen bei Plautus’, Hermes 37: 353–90Google Scholar
Schnurr, C. 1992. ‘The lex Julia theatralis of Augustus: some remarks on seating problems in theatre, amphitheatre and circus’, LCM 17: 147–60Google Scholar
Schrenk, L.P. 1994. ‘Sappho Frag. 44 and the “Iliad”’, Hermes 122: 144–50Google Scholar
Schwabe, L. 1862. Quaestiones Catullianae. GiessenGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J.P. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer ‘Phänomenologie’ der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 2005. Review of I.J.F. de Jong, R. Nunlist and A. Bowie (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden, 2004), BMCR 2005.07.48Google Scholar
Scotti, M. 1982. ‘I “canoni” degli autori greci’, Esperienze letterarie 7: 74–91Google Scholar
Scullard, H.H. 1981. Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1986. ‘Wedding ritual and textual criticism in Sophocles’ “Women of Trachis”’, Hermes 114: 50–9Google Scholar
Seaford, R. . 1987. ‘The tragic wedding’, JHS 107: 106–30Google Scholar
Seaford, R. . 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Seelbach, W. 1963. ‘Zu lateinischen Dichtern (Catull c. 4, Horaz c. I 28, Lupus von Aquincum’, RhM 106: 348–51Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1992. ‘Boundaries, worlds, and analogical thinking, or How Lucretius learned to love atomism and still write poetry’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt. 137–56, with ‘Discussion’, 170–5Google Scholar
Selden, D.L. 1992. ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London. 461–512Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. 1975. ‘Un influsso ciceroniano in Virgilio’, SIFC 47: 5–26Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. . 1986. ‘Discorso diretto’, in Enc. Virg. 2.102–6Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. 1978. Cicero’s Letters to his Friends. LondonGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. . 2001. Horatius: Opera4. Munich and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, H.A. 2005. ‘The judgment of Helen in Athenian art,’ in Barringer, J.M. and Hurwit, J.M. (eds.), Periklean Athens and its Legacy: Problems and Perspectives. Austin, TX. 47–62Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1996. ‘The art of deceit: Pseudolus and the nature of reading’, CQ 46: 152–74Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. . 2009. Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shell, M. 1978. The Economy of Literature. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Shell, M. . 1982. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Shibles, W.A. 1971. Metaphor: An Annotated Bibliography and History. Whitewater, WIGoogle Scholar
Shipton, K.M.W. 1983. ‘A house in the city: Catullus 68.68’, Latomus 42: 869–76Google Scholar
Sider, D. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. . 2010. ‘Greek verse on a vase by Douris’, Hesperia 79: 541–54Google Scholar
Silk, E.T. 1952. ‘Notes on Cicero and the Odes of Horace’, YClS 13: 147–58Google Scholar
Silk, E.T. . 1956. ‘A fresh approach to Horace, II.20’, AJPh 77: 255–63Google Scholar
Silk, M.S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M.B. 1993. ‘Catullus in performance’, CJ 89: 61–8Google Scholar
Skinner, M.B. . 2001. ‘Among those present: Catullus 44 and 10’, Helios 28: 57–73Google Scholar
Skinner, M.B. . 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1976. ‘Zur Überlieferung und zum Text Catulls’, Acta Philologica Aenipontana 3: 68–69Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. . 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Slater, N.W. 1985. Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 1993. ‘Improvisation in Plautus’, in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen. 113–24Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 2002. Spectator Politics: Metatheater and Performance in Aristophanes. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, I. 2015. ‘Ancient etymology: a tool for thinking’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Vol. 2. Leiden. 896–922Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z. 1982. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jamestown. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.Z. . 1987. ‘The domestication of sacrifice’, in Hamerton-Kelly, R.G. (ed.), Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford, CA. 191–205Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. 1983. ‘Archaeology’, in Crawford, M. (ed.), Sources for Ancient History. Cambridge. 137–84Google Scholar
Solodow, J.B. 1988. The World of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Solodow, J.B. . 1989. ‘Forms of literary criticism in Catullus: polymetric vs. epigram’, CPh 84: 312–19Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1991. ‘Reading’ Greek Culture: Texts and Images, Rituals and Myths. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. 2018. Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. . 2019. ‘Schools, reading and poetry in the early Greek world’, CCJ 65: 150–72Google Scholar
Speyer, W. 1971. Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum: ein Versuch ihrer Deutung. MunichGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, P. and White, A. 1986. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Šterbenc Erker, D. 2009. ‘Das Lupercalia-Fest im augusteischen Rom: Performativität, Raum und Zeit’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 11: 145–78Google Scholar
Stern, J. 1978. ‘Theocritus’ epithalamion for Helen’, RBPh 56: 29–37Google Scholar
Stierle, K. 1980. ‘The reading of fictional texts’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 83–105Google Scholar
Stigers, E.S. 1977. ‘Retreat from the male: Catullus 62 and Sappho’s erotic flowers’, Ramus 6: 83–102Google Scholar
Streuli, P.E. 1969. Die Lesbia-Partien in Catulls Allius-Elegie: Ein Kommentar. UrnäschGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. 1995. ‘Cicero and Greek philosophy’, HSPh 97: 53–61Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Ennius. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. . 1995. ‘Der Pyrrhos-Krieg in Ennius’ Annales VI im Lichte der ersten Ennius-Papyri aus Herculaneum’, ZPE 106: 31–52Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. . 2012. ‘Der Anfangsprozess der “Kanonisierung” Vergils’, in Becker, E.-M. and Scholz, S. (eds.), Kanon in Konstruktion und Dekonstruktion: Kanonisierungsprozesse religiöser Texte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Berlin. 171–219Google Scholar
Suleiman, S.R. 1980. ‘Introduction: varieties of audience-oriented criticism’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 3–45Google Scholar
Suleiman, S.R. and Crosman, I. (eds.). 1980. The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J.P. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 1–26Google Scholar
Susini, G.C. 1973. The Roman Stonecutter: An Introduction to Latin Epigraphy, tr. A.M. Dabrowski. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, E.H. 2002. Horace’s Well-Trained Reader: Toward a Methodology of Audience Participation in the Odes. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, M. 1989. Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Svennung, J. 1945. Catulls Bildersprache I: Vergleichende Stilstudien. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. . 1978. History in Ovid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. . 1986. The Augustan Aristocracy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H.P. 1972–3. Die Lyrik des Horaz: Eine Interpretation der Oden. 2 Vols. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H.P. . 1984–90. Catull: Eine Interpretation. 3 Vols. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Taladoire, B.-A. 1956. Essai sur le comique de Plaute. MonacoGoogle Scholar
Taplin, O. 1980. ‘The shield of Achilles within the Iliad’, G&R 27: 1–21Google Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. 1998. ‘Parenthetically speaking (in Virgil and other poets)’, in Knox and Foss (1998). 141–57Google Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. . 2002. ‘Ovid and ancient literary history’, in Hardie (2002c). 13–33Google Scholar
Temin, P. 2004. ‘Financial intermediation in the early Roman Empire’, The Journal of Economic History 64: 705–33Google Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. 1999. ‘Closure and transformation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge. 142–61Google Scholar
Thomas, K. 2009. The Ends of Life: Roads to Fulfilment in Early Modern England. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. 1986. ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSPh 90: 171–98Google Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1988. Virgil: Georgics. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1992. ‘The old man revisited: memory, reference and genre in Virgil Georgics 4.116–48’, MD 29: 44–51Google Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 2011. Horace: Odes Book IV and Carmen Saeculare. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, V. 1989. Shakespeare’s Roman Worlds. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, O. 1992. Ritual and Desire: Catullus 61 and 62 and Other Ancient Documents on Wedding and Marriage. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, O. . 2002. ‘An introduction to the study of Catullus’ wedding poems: the ritual drama of Catullus 62’, C&M 53: 255–87Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. 1964. ‘Interpretations of Catullus—II. Catullus 95.8’, Phoenix 18: 30–6Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. . 1998. Catullus, Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary2. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. 2008. Credit and Blame. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Tobias, J. 1998. ‘Japanese punctuation’, in Lupton (1998). 16–17Google Scholar
Torelli, M. 1982. Typology and Structure of Roman Historical Reliefs. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Tosi, R. 2007. Dizionario delle sentenze latine e greche. MilanGoogle Scholar
Townend, G.B. 1969. ‘Some problems of punctuation in the Latin hexameter’, CQ 19: 330–44Google Scholar
Townend, G.B. . 1969–70. ‘Virgil unpunctuated’, PVS 9: 76–86Google Scholar
Traglia, A. 1986. Poeti latini arcaici. TurinGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. 1996. ‘optivo cognomine crescit: Properzio e l’ironia di Orazio’, Lexis 14: 121–4Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, J.M. 2007. Catullus: A Textual Reappraisal. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1973. ‘Cicero, Horace, and mutual friends: Lamiae and Varrones Murenae’, Phoenix 27: 245–61Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. . 1991. Roman Marriage: iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Trotter, D. 1992. ‘Gesture as language’, LRB (30 January 1992), 14–16Google Scholar
Tuplin, C.J. 1981. ‘Catullus 68’, CQ 31: 113–39Google Scholar
Turner, E.G. 1987. Greek Manuscripts of the Ancient World2, rev. P.J. Parsons. LondonGoogle Scholar
Valette-Cagnac, E. 1997. La Lecture à Rome: rites et pratiques. ParisGoogle Scholar
Van Sickle, J. 1980. ‘Catullus 68.73–8 in context (vv. 67–80)’, HSPh 84: 91–5Google Scholar
Vardi, A.D. 1996. ‘Diiudicatio locorum: Gellius and the history of a mode in ancient comparative criticism’, CQ 46: 81–9Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1987. ‘Personality and power: Livy’s depiction of the Appii Claudii in the First Pentad’, TAPhA 117: 203–26Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. . 1998–9. ‘The Quinctii in Livy’s First Pentad: the rhetoric of anti-rhetoric’, CW 92: 513–30Google Scholar
Versnel, H.S. 2011. Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. 1984. Writing History. Essay on Epistemology, tr. M. Moore-Rinvolucri. ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. . 1988. Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, tr. D. Pellauer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Waldner, K. 2000. Geburt und Hochzeit des Kriegers: Geschlechterdifferenz und Initiation in Mythos und Ritual der griechischen Polis. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Waldner, K. . 2007. ‘Griechische und römische Aitiologie in Ovids Metamorphosen’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselman, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, Vol. 2. Berlin. 203–37Google Scholar
Waldner, K. . 2014. ‘Aitiologie und Religion in der griechisch-römischen Antike’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 25–57Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. ‘Civilis princeps: between citizen and king’, JRS 72: 32–48Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1986. ‘Image and authority in the coinage of Augustus’, JRS 76: 66–87Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1987. ‘Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol. 221–30Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1988. ‘Greek knowledge, Roman power’, CPh 83: 224–33Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1989. Review of Zanker (1988), JRS 79: 157–64Google Scholar
Walsh, G. 1984. The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. 2014. ‘Ovids alma Venus, die Mutter der Aitiologie’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 431–59Google Scholar
Walter, A. . forthcoming (a). “Ever Since Then”: Time in Ancient Aetiology, chapter 3.Google Scholar
Walter, A. . forthcoming (b). ‘tempora mutantur. Metamorphic imagery in Ovid’s Fasti’.Google Scholar
Walton, K.L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Watson, L.C. 1990. ‘Rustic Suffenus (Catullus 22) and literary rusticity’, PLLS 6: 13–33Google Scholar
Watson, L.C. . 1995. ‘Horace’s Epodes: the impotence of iambos?’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 188–202Google Scholar
Watson, L.C. . 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Watson, L.C. . 2005. ‘Catullan recycling? Cacata carta’, Mnemosyne 58: 270–7Google Scholar
Wehrle, W.T. 1992. The Satiric Voice: Program, Form and Meaning in Persius and Juvenal. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, O. 1926. Die Distichen des Catulls. TübingenGoogle Scholar
West, D.A. 1967. Reading Horace. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
West, D.A. . 1969a. The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
West, D.A. . 1969b. ‘Multiple-correspondence similes in the Aeneid’, JRS 59: 40–9Google Scholar
West, D.A. . 1970. ‘Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents’, Philologus 114: 262–75Google Scholar
West, D.A. . 1975. ‘Lucretius’ methods of argument (3.417–614)’, CQ 25: 94–116Google Scholar
West, M.L. 1993. ‘Simonides Redivivus’, ZPE 98: 1–14Google Scholar
West, S. 1969. ‘The Greek version of the legend of Tefnut’, JEA 55: 161–83Google Scholar
Wheeler, A.L. 1930. ‘Tradition in the epithalamium’, AJPh 51: 205–23Google Scholar
Whitaker, G. 2007. ‘… Brevique Adnotatione Critica … : a preliminary history of the Oxford Classical Texts’, in Stray, C. (ed.), Classical Books: Scholarship and Publishing in Britain Since 1800. London. 113–34Google Scholar
White, H. 1913. Appian’s Roman History. Cambridge, MA and LondonGoogle Scholar
White, H. . 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
White, M. and Epston, D. 1990. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
White, P. 1987. ‘Horace, Epistles 2.1.50–54’, TAPhA 117: 227–34Google Scholar
White, P. . 1993. Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Ancient Rome. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Wickham, E.C. 1896. Horace: Odes and Epodes. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wickham, E.C. . 1903. Horace: Satires and Epistles. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wickham, E.C., rev. Garrod, H.W. 1912. Q. Horati Flacci Opera2. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wiedemann, T. 1975. ‘The political background to Ovid’s Tristia 2’, CQ 25: 264–71Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wildberg, C. 1993. ‘Simplicius und das Zitat: Zur Überlieferung des Anführungszeichens’, in Berger, F., Brockmann, C., De Gregorio, G., Ghisu, M.I., Kotzabassi, S. and Noack, B. (eds.), Symbolae Berolinenses für Dieter Harflinger. Amsterdam. 87–99Google Scholar
Wilders, J. 1978. The Lost Garden: A View of Shakespeare’s English and Roman History Plays. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilders, J. . 1995. Antony and Cleopatra. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wili, W. 1948. Horaz und die augusteische Kultur. BaselGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L.P. 1945. Horace and his Lyric Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Willcock, M.M. 1987. Plautus: Pseudolus. BristolGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.D. 1992. ‘Representations of the book-roll in Latin poetry: Ovid, Tr. 1,1,3–4 and related texts’, Mnemosyne 45: 178–89Google Scholar
Williams, G.D. . 2002. ‘Ovid’s exilic poetry: worlds apart’, in Body, B.W. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden. 337–81Google Scholar
Williams, G.W. 1962. ‘Poetry in the moral climate of Augustan Rome’, JRS 52: 28–46Google Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1978. Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1980. Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wingo, E.O. 1972. Latin Punctuation in the Classical Age. The HagueGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J.J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1950. Libertas as a Political Ideal at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 1969. Catullan Questions. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate: 139 B.C.–A.D. 14. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1974. Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1976/1987. ‘Catullus 16’, LCM 1: 14–17 = Roman Studies Literary and Historical. Liverpool. 222–4Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1982. ‘Pete nobiles amicos: poets and patrons in late Republican Rome’, in Gold, B.K. (ed.), Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin, TX. 28–49Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1985. Catullus and his World: A Reappraisal. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1995a. ‘The god of the Lupercal’, JRS 85: 1–22Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1995b. Remus: A Roman Myth. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, A. and Wiseman, [T.]P. 2011. Ovid: Times and Reasons. A New Translation of Fasti. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wood, N., ed. 1996. Antony and Cleopatra. Buckingham and Bristol, PAGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1985. ‘Ibycus and Polycrates’, Phoenix 39: 193–220Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. 1972. ‘Horace’s Odes Diffugere niues and Soluitur acris hiems’, Latomus 31: 752–78Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1974. ‘Exegi monumentum: Horace, Odes 3.30’, in Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. Cambridge. 115–28Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1979. ‘Self-imitation and the substance of history: Tacitus, Annals 1.61–5 and Histories 2.70, 5.14–15’, in West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 143–55Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1983. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. LondonGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1989. ‘Virgil the historian: Aeneid 8.626–62 and Livy’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J.B. and Jocelyn, H.D. (eds.), Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C.O. Brink. Cambridge. 132–45Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2002. ‘Biformis uates: the Odes, Catullus and Greek lyric’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 53–64Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2003. ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace, Odes 2.1’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. 191–216Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2007. Sallust: Catiline’s War, the Jugurthine War, Histories. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2012. From Poetry to History: Selected Papers. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2018. The Annals of Tacitus. Book 4. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.). 2002. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and Martin, R.H. 1996. The Annals of Tacitus: Book 3. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.). 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, M. and Osteen, M. (eds.). 1999. The New Economic Criticism: Studies in the Intersection of Literature and Economics. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1975. ‘The transformations of Pseudolus’, TAPhA 105: 403–16Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.). 2003. Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry: A Literature and its Audience. London, Sydney, and Wolfeboro, NHGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F.I. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. 1980. ‘Horace’s Liber Sermonum: the structure of ambiguity’, Arethusa 13: 59–77Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1982. ‘Catullus’, in Luce, T.J. (ed.), Ancient Writers: Greece and Rome. Volume II: Lucretius to Ammianus Marcellinus. New York. 643–67Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1983. ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian past’, Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1995. Cicero De Re Publica: Selections. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 2002. ‘Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the development of Augustan poetry’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 38–52Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. 1951. ‘Plutarchos von Chaironeia’, RE 2R 21: 636–962Google Scholar
Zielinski, T.S. 1912. Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680196.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680196.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Denis Feeney, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Introduction by Stephen Hinds, University of Washington
  • Book: Explorations in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 05 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680196.023
Available formats
×