Abers, G.A., 2000. Hydrated subducted crust at 100–250 km depth, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 176, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abers, G.A., Plank, T., Hacker, B.R., 2003. The wet Nicaraguan slab, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afanasiev, M.V., Boehm, C., van Driel, M., Krischer, L., Rietmann, M., May, D.A., Knepley, M.G., Fichtner, A., 2019. Modular and flexible spectral-element waveform modelling in two and three dimensions, Geophys. J. Int., 216, 1675–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alterman, Z., Lowenthal, D., 1972. Computer generated seismograms, Methods in Computational Physics, 12, 35–164, ed. Bolt B.A., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Aki, K., 1957. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves with special reference to microtremors, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 35, 415–456.Google Scholar

Aki, K., Lee, W.H.K., 1976. Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earthquakes – 1. A homogeneous initial model, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 4381–4399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aki K., Richards P.G.,2002. Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edition, University Science Books, Sausalito.Google Scholar

Aki, K., Chouet, B., 1975. Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation and scattering effects, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3322–3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An, M., 2012. A simple method for determining the spatial resolution of a general inverse problem, Geophys. J. Int., 191, 849–864.Google Scholar

Antolik, M., Gu, Yu-J., Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A.M., 2003. J362D28: a new joint model of compressional and shear velocity in the Earth’s mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artemieva, I., 2011. The Lithosphere: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Asten, M.W., 2006. On bias and noise in passive seismic data from finite circular array data processed using SPAC methods, Geophysics, 71, V153–V162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astiz, L., Earle, P., Shearer, P., 1996. Global stacking of broadband seismograms. Seism. Res. Lett., 67(4), 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G.E., 1962. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering, J. Geophys. Res., 67, 4427–4440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G.E., Gilbert, F., 1968. The resolving power of gross Earth data, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 16, 169–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baeten, G., Ziolowski, A., 1990. The Vibroseis Source, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bakulin, A., Calvert, R., 2006, The virtual source method: Theory and case study, Geophysics, 71, SI139–SI150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberger, A., Chavent, G., Lailly, P., 1977. Une application de la théorie du contrôle à un problème inverse sismique, Ann. Geophys., 33, 183–200.Google Scholar

Bataille, K., Wu, R.S., Flatté, S.M., 1990. Inhomogeneities near the core–mantle boundary evidenced from scattered waves: A review, Pure Appl. Geophys., 132, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, T.W., 2012. On recent seismic tomography for the western United States, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 13, doi:10.1029/2011GC003977.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BenMenahem, A., Singh, S.J., 1981. Seismic Waves and Sources, Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bensen, G.D., Ritzwoller, M.H., Barmin, M.P., Levshin, A.L., Lin, F., Moschetti, M.P., Shapiro, N.M., Yang, Y., 2007. Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1239–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkhout, A.J., 1983. Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wavefield Extrapolation, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Berkhout, A.J., 1997. Pushing the limits of seismic imaging, Part I: Prestack migration in terms of double dynamic focusing, Geophysics, 62, 937–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernauer, M., Fichtner, A., Igel, H., 2014. Optimal observables for multi-parameter seismic tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 198, 1241–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betancourt, M., 2017. A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, ArXiv, arXiv:1701.02434 [stat.ME].Google Scholar

Bijwaard, H., Spakman, W., Engdahl, E.R., 1998. Closing the gap between regional and global travel time tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 30 055–30 078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, R., Sen, M., 2017. 2D full-waveform inversion and uncertainty estimation using the reversible jump Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, SEG 2017 Expanded Abstracts, 1280–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom, N., Boehm, C., Fichtner, A., 2017. Synthetic inversions for density using seismic and gravity data, Geophys. J. Int., 209, 1204–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom, N., Gokhberg, A., Fichtner, A., 2020. Seismic waveform inversion of the Central and Eastern Mediterranean upper mantle, Solid Earth, 11, 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehm, C., Hanzich, M., de la Puente, J., Fichtner, A., 2016. Wavefield compression for adjoint methods in full-waveform inversion, Geophysics, 81, R385–R397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehm, C., Korta, N., Vinard, N., Balic, I., Fichtner, A., 2018. Time-domain spectral-element ltrasound waveform tomography using a stochastic quasi-Newton method, Medical Imaging 2018, Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography 10580, doi:10.1117/12.2293299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, H., Masters, G., 2001. Travel times of P and S from the global digital seismic networks: Implications for the relative variation of P and S velocity in the mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 13 527–13 540.Google Scholar

Boore, D.M., 1970. Love waves in nonuniform waveguides: Finite difference calculations, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 1512–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottou, L., 2010. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent, COMPSTAT 2010, 177–186.Google Scholar

Boué, P., Poli, P., Campillo, M., Pedersen, H., Briand, X., Roux, P., 2013. Teleseismic correlations of ambient seismic noise for deep global imaging of the Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 844–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boué, P., Poli, P., Campillo, M., Roux, P., 2014. Reverberations, coda waves and ambient noise: Correlations at the global scale and retrieval of the deep phases, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 391, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowden, D.C., Tsai, V.C., Lin, F.-C., 2015. Site amplification, attenuation, and scattering from noise correlation amplitudes across a dense array in Long Beach, CA, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1360–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozdağ, E., Trampert, J., Tromp, J., 2011. Misfit functions for full waveform inversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 845-870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozdağ, E., Peter, D., Lefebvre, M., Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J., Hill, J., Podhorszki, N., Pugmire, D., 2016. Global adjoint tomography: first-generation model, Geophys. J. Int., 207, 1739–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brittan, J., Jones, I., 2019. FWI evolution – from a monolith to a toolkit, The Leading Edge, 38, 178–184.Google Scholar

Brossier, R., Operto, S., Virieux, J., 2009. Robust elastic frequency-domain full waveform inversion using the L₁ norm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L20319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broyden, C.G., 1970. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms, J. Inst. Math. Appl., 6, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bui-Tanh, T., Ghattas, O., Martin, J., Stadler, G., 2003. A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems part I: The linearized case, with application to global seismic inversion, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 35, A2494–A2523.Google Scholar

Bungum, H., Husebye, E.S., 1971. Errors in time delay measurements, Pure Appl. Geophys., 91, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunks, C., Saleck, F.M., Zaleski, S., Chavent, G., 1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion, Geophysics, 69, 1457–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgos, G., Montagner, J.-P., Beucler, E., Capdeville, Y., Mocquet, A., Drilleau, M., 2014. Oceanic lithosphere/asthenosphere boundary from surface wave dispersion data, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 119, 1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrd, R., Chin, G., Neveitt, W., Nocedal, J., 2011. On the use of stochastic Hessian information in optimization methods for machine learning, SIAM J. Opt., 21, 977–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cagniard, L., 1939. Réflexion et Réfraction des Ondes Séismiques Progressives, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar

Campillo, M., Paul, A., 2003. Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda, Science, 299, 547–549.Google Scholar

Cao, S.-H., Kennett, B.L.N., 1989. Reflection seismograms in a 3-D elastic model: an isochronal approach, Geophys. J. Int., 99, 63–80.Google Scholar

Capdeville, Y., Gung, Y., Romanowicz, B., 2005. Towards global Earth tomography using the spectral element method: A technique based on source stacking Geophys. J. Int., 162, 541–554.Google Scholar

Capdeville, Y., Marigo, J.-J., 2013. A non-periodic two-scale asymptotic method to take account of rough topographies for 2-D elastic wave propagation, Geophys. J. Int., 192, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., Reshef, M., 1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations, Geophysics, 50, 705–708.Google Scholar

Červený, V., Popov, M., Pšenčík, I., 1982. Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media – Gaussian beam approach, Geophys. J. Int., 70, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, C.H., Drummond, R., 1982. Body wave seismograms in inhomogeneous media using Maslov asymptotic theory, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, S277–S317.Google Scholar

Chapman, C.H., 2004. Fundamentals of Seismic Wave Propagation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, M., Tromp, J., Helmberger, D.V., Kanamori, H., 2007. Waveform modelling of the slab beneath Japan. J. Geophys. Res.. 112, B02305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, P., Zhao, L., Jordan, T.H., 2007. Full 3D tomography for the crustal structure of the Los Angeles region, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 97, 1094–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Y., Saygin, E., 2020. Empirical Green’s function retrieval using cross-correlation of noise correlations (C²) J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 125, e2019JB01826.Google Scholar

Chernov, L.A., 1960. Wave Propagation in a Random Medium, (Engl. trans. by R.A. Silverman), McGraw-Hill, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christie, P.F., Hughes, V., Kennett, B.L.N., 1983. Velocity filtering of seismic reflection data, First Break, 1(3), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claerbout, J., 1968. Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response, Geophysics, 33, 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, R.W., Stolt, R.H., 1981. A Born-WKBJ inversion method for acoustic reflection data, Geophysics, 46, 1559–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, R.W., 2020. Imaging the subsurface with ambient noise autocorrelations, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleary, J.R., Haddon, R.A.W, 1972. Seismic wave scattering near the core-mantle boundary: A new interpretation of precursors to PKP, Nature, 240, 549–551.Google Scholar

Cowles, M.K., Carlin, B.P., 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review, J. Am. Stat. Ass., 91, 883–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creutz, M., 1988. Global Monte Carlo algorithms for many-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. D, 38, 1228-1238.Google Scholar

Cupillard, P., Capdeville, Y., 2018. Non-periodic homogenization of 3-D elastic media for the seismic wave equation, Geophys. J. Int., 213, 983–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

da Costa Filho, C.A., Ravasi, M., Curtis, A., Meles, G.A., 2014, Elastodynamic Green’s function retrieval through single-sided Marchenko inverse scattering. Phys. Rev. E, 90, 063201.Google Scholar

Dahlen, F.A., Tromp, J., 1998. Theoretical Global Seismology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Dahlen, F.A., Hung, S.-H., Nolet, G., 2000. Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes – I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainty, A.M., Toksöz, M.N., Anderson, K.R., Pines, P.J., Nakamura, Y., Latham, G., 1974. Seismic scattering and shallow structure of the Moon in Oceanus Procellarum, Moon, 91, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainty, A.M., 1990. Studies of coda using array and three-component processing. Pure Appl. Geophys., 132, 221–244.Google Scholar

Dainty, A.M., Toksöz, M.N., 1990. Array analysis of seismic scattering, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 2242–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, C.A., Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A.M., 2008. The global attenuation structure of the upper mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 113, doi:10.1029/2007JB005429.Google Scholar

Deal, M.M., Nolet, G., 1996. Nullspace shuttles, Geophys. J. Int., 124, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debayle, E., Kennett, B., Priestley, K., 2005. Global azimuthal seismic anisotropy: the unique plate-motion deformation of Australia, Nature, 433, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Hoop, A.T., 1958. Representation theorems for the displacement in an elastic solid and their application to elastodynamic diffraction theory, D.Sc thesis, Technische Hogeschool Delft.Google Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., Vlaar, N.J., 1973. Regions of seismic wave scattering in the Earth’s mantle and precursors to PKP, Nature Phys. Sci., 243, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1974. Seismic wave scattering near caustics: observation of PKKP precursors, Nature, 274, 352–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1976. Characteristics of lower mantle heterogeneities from scattered waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 44, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Draganov, D., Wapenaar, K., Mulder, W., Singer, J., Verdel, A., 2007. Retrieval of reflections from seismic background-noise measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Hales, A.L., Lapwood, E.R., 1975. Parametrically simple Earth models consistent with geophysical data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 10, 12–48.Google Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Hager, B.H., O’Connell, R.J., 1977. Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewoński, A.M., Anderson, D.L. 1981. Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25, 297–356.Google Scholar

Dziewoński, A.M., Woodhouse, J.H., 1987. Global images of the Earth’s interior, Science 236, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ekström, G., Abers, G.A., Webb, S.C., 2009. Determination of surface-wave phase velocities across USArray from noise and Aki’s spectral formulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L18301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekström, G., 2011. A global model of Love and Rayleigh surface wave dispersion and anisotropy, 25–250 s, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1668–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engdahl, E.R., van der Hilst, R.D., Buland, R., 1998. Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 722–743.Google Scholar

Ermert, L., Villaseñor, A., Fichtner, A., 2016. Cross-correlation imaging of ambient noise sources. Geophys. J. Int., 204, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ermert, L., Sager, K., Afanasiev, M., Boehm, C., Fichtner, A., 2017. Ambient seismic source inversion in a heterogeneous Earth: Theory and application to the Earth’s Hum. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 122, 9184–9207.Google Scholar

Ewing, W. M., Jardetsky, W. S. & Press, F., 1957. Elastic Waves in Layered Media, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Faccioli, E., Maggio, F., Paolucci, R., Quarteroni, A., 1997. 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudospectral domain decomposition method, J. Seism., 1, 237–251.Google Scholar

Feng, J., Yao, H., Poli, P., Fang, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, P., 2017. Depth variations of 410 km and 660 km discontinuities in eastern North China Craton revealed by ambient noise interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 8328–8335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., 2006. The adjoint method in seismology – I. Theory, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 157, 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Igel, H., 2008. Efficient numerical surface wave propagation through the optimization of discrete crustal models - a technique based on non-linear dispersion curve matching (DCM), Geophys. J. Int., 173, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H., Bunge, H.-P., 2008. Theoretical background for continental and global scale full-waveform inversion in the time-frequency domain, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H., Bunge, H.-P., 2009. Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1703–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H., Bunge, H.-P., 2010. Full seismic waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure: New insights into the past and present states of the Australasian upper mantle, Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., 290, 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., 2011. Full Seismogram Waveform Modelling and Inversion, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Trampert, J., 2011a. Hessian kernels of seismic data functionals based upon adjoint techniques, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 775–798.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Trampert, J., 2011b. Resolution analysis in full waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1604–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Trampert, J., Cupillard, P., Saygin, E., Taymaz, T., Capdeville, Y., Villasenor, A., 2013. Multi-scale full-waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 534–556.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Trampert, J., 2013. Separating intrinsic and apparent anisotropy, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 219, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., 2014. Source and processing effects on noise correlations, Geophys. J. Int., 197, 1527–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., van Leeuwen, T., 2015. Resolution analysis by random probing, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5549–5573.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Hanasoge, S.M., 2017. Discrete wave equation upscaling, Geophys. J. Int., 209, 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., Stehly, L., Ermert, L., Boehm, C., 2017. Generalized interferometry – I: theory for interstation correlations, Geophys. J. Int., 208, 603–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichtner, A., van Herwaarden, D.-P., Afanasiev, M., Simute, S., Krischer, L., Cubuk-Sabuncu, Y., Taymaz, T., Colli, L., Saygin, E., Villasenor, A., Trampert, J., Cupillard, P., Bunge, H.-P., Igel, H., 2018a. The Collaborative Seismic Earth Model: Generation I, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 4007–4016.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Zunino, A., Gebraad, L., 2018b. Hamiltonian Monte Carlo solution of tomographic inverse problems, Geophys. J. Int., 216, 1344–1363.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Tsai, V., 2019. Theoretical foundations of noise interferometry, 109–143, in Seismic Ambient Noise, eds. Nakata, N., Gualtieri, L., Fichtner, A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fichtner, A., Zunino, A., 2019. Hamiltonian nullspace shuttles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 644–651.Google Scholar

Fishwick, S., Kennett, B.L.N., Reading, A.M., 2005. Contrasts in lithospheric structure within the Australian Craton, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 231, 163–176.Google Scholar

Flatté, S.M., Wu, R.S., 1988. Small scale structure in the lithosphere and asthenosphere deduced from arrival time and amplitude fluctuations at NORSAR, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6601–6614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, R., 1970. A new approach to variable metric algorithms, Comp. J., 13, 317–322.Google Scholar

Ford, H.A., Fischer, K.M., Abt, D.L., Rychert, C.A., Elkins-Tanton, L.T., 2013. The lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary and cratonic lithospheric layering beneath Australia from Sp wave imaging, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 300, 299–310.Google Scholar

Forsyth, D.W., Li, A., 2005. Array-analysis of two-dimensional variations in surface wave phase velocity and azimuthal anisotropy in the presence of multi-pathing interference, in Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms, eds. Levander A., Nolet G., AGU Geophysical Monograph, 157, 81–98.Google Scholar

Frasier, C.W., 1970. Discrete time solution of plane P–SV waves in a plane layered medium, Geophysics, 35, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, S.W., Romanowicz, B.A., 2014. Whole-mantle radially anisotropic shear velocity structure from spectral-element waveform tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 199, 1303–1327.Google Scholar

Frenkel, A., Clayton, R.W., 1986. Finite difference simulation of seismic scattering: implications for the propagation of short-period seismic waves in the crust and models in crustal heterogeneity, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6465–6489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friederich, W., Wielandt, E., Stange, S., 1993. Multiple forward scattering of teleseismic surface waves: Comparison with an exact solution and Born single-scattering methods, Geophys. J. Int., 112, 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friederich, W., Wielandt, E., Stange, S., 1994. Non-plane geometries of seismic surface wavefields and their implications for regional surface-wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 931–948.Google Scholar

Friederich, W., Wielandt, E., 1995. Interpretation of seismic surface waves in regional networks: Joint estimation of wavefield geometry and local phase velocity, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 731–744.Google Scholar

Fuchs, K., 1968. Das Reflexions- und Transmissionsvermögen eines geschichteten Mediums mit belieber Tiefen-Verteilung der elastischen Moduln und der Dichte für schragen Einfall Ebener Wellen, Z. Geophys., 34, 389–411.Google Scholar

Fuchs, K., Müller, G., 1971. Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 23, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukao, Y., Nishida, K., Kobayashi, N., 2010. Sea floor topography, ocean infragravity waves, and background Love and Rayleigh waves, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T., Kennett, B.L.N, Furumura, M., 1998. Synthetic seismograms for a laterally heterogeneous whole earth models by the pseudospectral method, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T., Kennett, B.L.N., 2005. Subduction zone guided waves and the heterogeneity structure of the subducted plate – intensity anomalies in northern Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 110(B10), B10302.Google Scholar

Furumura, T., Kennett, B.L.N., 2008. A scattering waveguide in the heterogeneous subducting plate, in Scattering of Short-Period Seismic Waves in Earth Heterogeneity, eds. Sato H., Fehler M., Advances in Geophysics, 50, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T., Kennett, B.L.N., Padhy, S., 2016. Enhanced waveguide effect for deep-focus earthquakes in the subducting Pacific slab produced by a metastable olivine wedge, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 121, 6779–6796.Google Scholar

Gal, M., Reading, A.M., Ellingsen, S.P., Koper, K.D., Burlacu, R., 2017. Full wavefield decomposition of high-frequency secondary microseisms reveals distinct arrival azimuths for Rayleigh and Love waves, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 122, 4660–4675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galetti, E., Curtis, A., 2012. Generalised receiver functions and seismic interferometry, Tectonophysics, 532, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garth, T., Rietbrock, A., 2014. Downdip velocity changes in subducted oceanic crust beneath Northern Japan : insights from guided waves, Geophys. J. Int., 198, 1342–1358.Google Scholar

Gauthier, O., Virieux, J., Tarantola, A., 1986. Two-dimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms: numerical results, Geophysics, 51, 1387–1403.Google Scholar

Gebraad, L., Boehm, C., Fichtner, A., 2020. Bayesian elastic full-waveform inversion using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JB018428.Google Scholar

Gee, L., Jordan, T.H., 1992. Generalised seismological data functionals, Geophys. J. Int., 111, 363–390.Google Scholar

Geli, L., Bard, P-Y., Jullien, B., 1988. The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: A review and new results, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 78, 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giardini, D., and 62 others, 2020. The seismicity of Mars, Nature Geoscience, 13, 205–212.Google Scholar

Gilbert, F., 1976. The representation of seismic displacements in terms of travelling waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 44, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, F., Helmberger, D.V., 1972. Generalized ray theory for a layered sphere, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 27, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gokhberg, A., Fichtner, A., 2016. Full-waveform inversion on heterogeneous HPC systems, Comp. Geosci., 89, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldfarb, D., 1970. A family of variable metric updates derived by variational means, Math. Comp., 24, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorbatov, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Saygin, E., 2013. Crustal properties from seismic station autocorrelograms, Geophys. J. Int., 192, 861–870.Google Scholar

Grand, S.P., van der Hilst, R.D., Widiyantoro, S., 1997. Global seismic tomography: a snapshot of convection in the Earth, Geology Today, 7,(4) 1–7.Google Scholar

Grand, S.P., 2002. Mantle shear-wave tomography and the fate of subducted slabs, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A360, 2475–2491.Google Scholar

Gregersen, S., 1978. Possible mode conversions between Love and Rayleigh waves at a continental margin, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 54, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregersen, S., Alsop, L.E., 1974. Amplitudes of horizontally refracted Love waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64, 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griewank, A., Walther, A., 2000. An implementation of checkpointing for the reverse or adjoint mode of computational differentiation, Trans. Math. Software, 26, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gudmundsson, O., Kennett, B.L.N., Goody, A., 1994. Broadband observations of upper mantle seismic phases in northern Australia and the attenuation structure in the upper mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 84, 207–236.Google Scholar

Gutenberg, B., 1913. Über die Konstitution des Erdinnern, erschlossen aus Erdbebenbeobachtungen, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 14, 1217–1218.Google Scholar

Halko, N., Martinsson, P.G., Tropp, J.A., 2011. Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions, SIAM Review, 53, 217–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, D., Curtis, A., Robertsson, J., van Manen, D., 2007. Interferometric surface-wave isolation and removal, Geophysics, 72, A69–A73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, D., Curtis, A., 2008. Seismic interferometry, surface waves and source distribution, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 1067–1087.Google Scholar

Hanasoge, S.M., Branicki, M., 2013. Interpreting cross-correlations of one-bit filtered noise, Geophys. J. Int., 195, 1811–1830.Google Scholar

Hansen, S.M., Dueker, K., Schmandt, B., 2015. Thermal classification of lithospheric discontinuities beneath USArray, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 431, 36–47Google Scholar

Harding, A.J., 1985. Slowness-time mapping of near offset seismic reflection data, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 80, 463–492.Google Scholar

Hasselmann, K. 1963. A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms, Rev. Geophys., 1, 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedlin, M.A.H., Shearer, P., 2000. An analysis of large scale variations in small-scale mantle heterogeneity using Global Seismographic Network recordings of precursors to PKP, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13 655–13 673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmberger, D. V., 1968. The crust-mantle transition in the Bering Sea, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 179–214.Google Scholar

Helmberger, D. V. , Wiggins, R. A., 1971. Upper mantle structure of the midwestern United States, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3229–3245.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, M.M., 2010. Partial melt in the oceanic low velocity zone, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 179, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong, T.-K., Kennett, B.L.N., 2002. On a wavelet-based method for the numerical simulation of wave propagation, J. Comput. Phys., 183, 577–622.Google Scholar

Hong, T.-K., Kennett, B.L.N., 2003. Scattering attenuation of 2D elastic waves: theory and numerical modeling using a wavelet-based method, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 922–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong, T.-K., Kennett, B.L.N., Wu, R.-S., 2004. Effects of the density perturbation in scattering, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(13), L13602.Google Scholar

Hong, T.-K., Wu, R.-S., Kennett, B.L.N., 2005. Stochastic features of scattering. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 148, 131–148.Google Scholar

Hopper, E., Ford, H.A., Fischer, K.M., Lekić, V., Fouch, M.J., 2014. The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary and the tectonic and magmatic history of the northwestern United States, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 402, 69–81.Google Scholar

Hron, F., 1972. Numerical methods of ray generation in multilayered media, Methods in Computational Physics, 12, 1–34, ed. Bolt B.A., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Huang, H.-H., Lin, F.-C., Tsai, V.C., Koper, K.D., 2015. High-resolution probing of inner core structure with seismic interferometry. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10622–10630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, J.A., 1968. The scattering of elastic waves by granular media, Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 21, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, J.A., Douglas, A., 1975. Rayleigh wave spectra and group velocity minima, and the resonance of P waves in layered structures, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 42, 175–188.Google Scholar

Hudson, J.A., 1982. Use of stochastic models in seismology, Geophys. J. Int., 82, 649–657.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, M.F., 1990. A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix for Laplacian smoothing splines, Comm. Stat. Sim., 19, 433–450.Google Scholar

Igel, H., Djikpéssé, H., Tarantola, A., 1996. Waveform inversion of marine reflection seismograms for P impedance and Poisson’s ratio, Geophys. J. Int., 124, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Igel, H., 2016. Computational Seismology: A Practical Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishii, M., Tromp, J., 2001. Normal mode and free-air gravity constraints on lateral variations in velocity and density of Earth’s mantle, Science, 285, 1231–1236.Google Scholar

Ito, Y., Shiomi, K., Nakajima, J., Hino, R., 2012. Autocorrelation analysis of ambient noise in northeastern Japan subduction zone, Tectonophysics, 572, 38–46.Google Scholar

Jones, I.F., Davison, I., 2014. Seismic imaging in and around salt bodies, Interpretation, 2(4), SL1–SL20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kárason, H., van der Hilst, R.D., 2000. Constraints on mantle convection from seismic tomography, in, The History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motion, AGU Geophysical Monograph, 121, 277–288.Google Scholar

Karato, S.-I., Karki, B.B., 2001. Origin of lateral variation of seismic wave velocities and density in the deep mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 21 771–21 783.Google Scholar

Kawakatsu, H., Watada, S., 2007. Seismic evidence for deep-water transportation in the mantle, Science, 316, 1468–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kawakatsu, H., Kumar, P., Takei, Y., Shinohara, M., Kanazawa, T., Araki, E., Suyehiro, K., 2009. Seismic evidence for sharp lithosphere-asthenosphere boundaries of oceanic plates, Science, 324, 499–502.Google Scholar

Kawakatsu, H., Utada, S., 2017. Seismic and electrical signatures of the lithosphere-asthenosphere system of the normal oceanic mantle, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 45, 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1972. Seismic waves in laterally inhomogeneous media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 27, 301–325.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1975. The effects of attenuation on seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65, 1643–1651.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Kerry, N. J. & Woodhouse, J. H., 1978. Symmetries in the reflection and transmission of elastic waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. , 52, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1979. The suppression of surface multiples on seismic records, Geophys. Prospect., 27, 584–600.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media, Cambridge University Press. Second edition 2009, ANU Press.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Harding, A.J., 1984. Guided low-frequency noise from air-gun sources, Geophys. Prospect., 32, 690–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1984a. Reflection operator method for elastic waves I – Irregular interfaces and regions, Wave Motion, 6, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1984b. Reflection operator method for elastic waves II – Composite regions and source problems, Wave Motion, 6, 419–429.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1984c. Guided waves in laterally varying media, I: Theoretical development, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 235–255.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1986. Wavenumber and wavetype coupling in laterally heterogeneous media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 87, 313–331.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Sambridge, M.S., Williamson, P.R., 1988. Subspace methods for large scale inverse problems involving multiple parameter classes, Geophys. J. Int., 94, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1990. Guided wave attenuation in laterally varying media, Geophys. J. Int., 100, 415–422.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Nolet, G., 1990. The interaction of the S-wavefield with upper mantle heterogeneity, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 751–762.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N, Koketsu, K., Haines, A.J, 1990. Propagation invariants, reflection and transmission in anisotropic, laterally varying media, Geophys. J. Int., 103, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1991. The removal of free surface interactions from three-component seismograms, Geophys. J. Int., 104, 153–163.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1993. A two-layer stacking procedure to enhance converted waves, Geophysics, 58, 997–1001.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Engdahl, E.R., Buland, R., 1995. Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from travel times, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1996. How does the shear-wave structure of the seabed affect the seismic wavefield?, Geophys. J. Int., 124, 341–348.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1998. Guided waves in 3-dimensional structures, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Widiyantoro, S., van der Hilst, R.D., 1998. Joint seismic tomography for bulk-sound and shear wavespeed in the Earth’s mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12 469–12 493.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 2001. The Seismic Wavefield I: Introduction and Theoretical Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 2002. The Seismic Wavefield II: Interpretation of Seismograms on Regional and Global Scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Gorbatov, A., 2004. Seismic heterogeneity in the mantle – strong shear wave signature of slabs, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 146, 88–100.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Bunge, H.-P., 2008. Geophysical Continua Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Furumura, T., 2008. Stochastic waveguide in the Lithosphere: Indonesian subduction zone to Australian Craton, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Fichtner, A., 2012. A unified concept for the comparison of seismograms using transfer functions, Geophys. J. Int., 191, 1403–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Furumura, T., 2013. High-frequency Po/So guided waves in the oceanic lithosphere: I – long-distance propagation, Geophys. J. Int., 195, 1862–1877.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Fichtner, A., Fishwick, S., Yoshizawa, K., 2013. Australian Seismological Reference Model (AuSREM): mantle component, Geophys. J. Int., 192, 871–887.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Furumura, T., Zhao, Y., 2014. High-frequency Po/So guided waves in the oceanic lithosphere: II – Heterogeneity and attenuation, Geophys. J. Int., 199, 614–630.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 2015. Lithosphere–asthenosphere P-wave reflectivity across Australia, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 431, 225–235.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Stipčević, J., Gorbatov, A., 2015a. Spiral arm seismic arrays, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 105, 2109–2116.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Saygin, E., Salmon, M., 2015b. Stacking autocorrelograms to map Moho depth with high spatial resolution in southeastern Australia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7490–7497.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Furumura, T., 2015. Towards the reconciliation of seismological and petrological perspectives on oceanic lithosphere heterogeneity, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 16, 3129–3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Furumura, T., 2016. Multi-scale seismic heterogeneity in the continental lithosphere, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 17, 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Yoshizawa, K., Furumura, T. 2017. Interactions of multi-scale heterogeneity in the lithosphere: Australia, Tectonophysics, 717, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Pham, T.-S., 2018a. The nature of the seismic correlation wavefield: Late coda correlations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 474, 20180082, doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0082Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Pham, T.-S., 2018b. Evolution of the seismic correlation wavefield for event coda, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 282, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Sippl, C., 2018. Lithospheric discontinuities in central Australia, Tectonophysics, 744, 10–22.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Furumura, T., 2019. Significant P wave conversions from upgoing S waves generated by very deep earthquakes around Japan, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 6:49.Google Scholar

Kent, G.H., Harding, A.J., Orcutt, J.A., 1993. Distribution of magma beneath the East Pacific Rise between the Clipperton Transform and the 9◦ 17′ N Deval from forward modeling of common depth point data, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 13 945–13 969.#################Google Scholar

Kim, N.W., Seriff, A.J., 1992. Marine PSSP reflections with a bottom velocity transition zone, Geophysics, 57, 161–170.Google Scholar

Kimman, W., Trampert, J., 2010. Approximations in seismic interferometry and their effects on surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 461–476.Google Scholar

Kind, R., Kosarev, G.L., Petersen, N.V., 1995. Receiver functions at the stations of the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN), Geophys. J. Int., 121, 191–202.Google Scholar

King, D.W., Haddon, R.A.W., Cleary, J. R., 1974. Array analysis of precursors to PKIKP in the distance range 128◦ to 142 ◦ , Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 37, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, S.D., Anderson, D.L., 1998. Edge-driven convection, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 160, 289–296.Google Scholar

Knopoff, L., 1972. Observation and inversion of surface-wave dispersion, Tectonophysics, 13, 497–519.Google Scholar

Koketsu, K., Kennett, B.L.N., Takenaka, H., 1991. 2-D reflectivity method and synthetic seismograms for irregularly layered structures – II. Invariant embedding approach, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 119–130.Google Scholar

Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J., 2002a. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation – I. Validation, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J., 2002b. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation – II. Three-dimensional models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 303–318.Google Scholar

Koper, K.D., Franks, J.M., Dombrovskaya, M., 2004. Evidence for small-scale heterogeneity in Earth’s inner core from a global study of PKiKP coda waves. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 228, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korn, M., 1988. P-wave coda analysis of short-period array data and the scattering and absorptive properties of the lithosphere. Geophys. J. Int., 93, 437–449.Google Scholar

Krischer, L., Fichtner, A., Žukauskaitė, S., Igel, H., 2015. Large-scale seismic inversion framework, Seis. Res. Lett., 86, 1198–1207.Google Scholar

Krischer, L., Igel, H., Fichtner, A., 2018. Automated large-scale full seismic waveform inversion for North America and the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 5902–5928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunetz, A., d’Erceville, E., 1962. Sur certaines propriétés d’une onde acoustique plane de compression dans une milieu stratifieé, Ann. de Geophys., 18, 351–359.Google Scholar

Kuo, C., Romanowicz, B., 2002. On the resolution of density anomalies in the Earth’s mantle using spectral fitting of normal-mode data, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamb, H., 1904. On the propagation of tremors over the surface of an elastic solid, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 203A, 1–42.Google Scholar

Lapwood, E. R., 1948. The disturbance due to a line source in a semi-infinite elastic medium, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 242A, 63–100.Google Scholar

Lapwood, E.R., Usami, T., 1981. Free Oscillations of the Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Larmat, C., Montagner, J.-P., Fink, M., Capdeville, Y., Tourin, A., Clévédé, E., 2006. Time-reversal imaging of seismic sources and application to the great Sumatra earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, doi:10.1029/2006GL026336.Google Scholar

Laske, G., Masters, G., 1996. Constraints on global phase velocity maps from long-period polarization data, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 16 059–16 075.Google Scholar

Laske, G., Masters, G., Ma, Z., Pasyanos, M., 2013. Update on CRUST1.0 – A 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust, Geophys. Res. Abstracts, 15, EGU2013–2658.Google Scholar

Lebedev, S., Schaeffer, A. J., 2013. Global shear speed structure of the upper mantle and transition zone, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 417–449.Google Scholar

Lehmann, I., 1936. P′ , Publ. Bureau Central Seism. Int. Série A, 14, 87–115.Google Scholar

Leng, K., Nissen-Meyer, T., van Driel, M., Hosseini, K., Al-Attar, D., 2019. AxiSEM3D: broadband seismic wavefields in 3-D global Earth models with undulating discontinuities, Geophys. J. Int., 217, 2125–2146.Google Scholar

Levshin, A.L., 1985. Effect of lateral inhomogeneities on surface wave amplitude measurements, Ann. Geophys., 3, 511–518.Google Scholar

Levshin, A.L., Ritzwoller, M.H., 2001. Automated detection, extraction, and measurement of regional surface waves, Pure Appl. Geophys., 158, 1531–1545.Google Scholar

Li, X.D., Romanowicz, B., 1995. Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling, Geophys. J. Int., 121, 695–709.Google Scholar

Li, L., Boué, P., Campillo, M., 2020. Observation and explanation of spurious seismic signals emerging in teleseismic noise correlations, Solid Earth, 11, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, F.-C., Moschetti, M.P., Ritzwoller, M.H., 2008. Surface wave tomography of the western United States from ambient seismic noise: Rayleigh and Love wave phase velocity maps, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, F.-C., Tsai, V.C., Schmandt, B., Duputel, Z., Zhan, Z., 2013. Extracting seismic core phases with array interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1049–1053.Google Scholar

Lindsey, N.J., Martin, E.R., Dreger, D.S., Freifeld, B., Cole, S., James, S.R., Biondi, B., Ajo-Franklin, J., 2017. Fiber-optic network observations of earthquake wavefields, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11792–11799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Q., Polet, J., Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J., 2004. Spectral-element moment tensor inversion for earthquakes in Southern California, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 94, 1748–1761.Google Scholar

Lobkis, O.I., Weaver, R.L., 2001. On the emergence of the Green’s function in the correlations of a diffuse field, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, 3011–3017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lognonné, P., and 108 others, 2020. Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data, Nature Geoscience, 13, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lomas, A., Curtis, A., 2019. An introduction to Marchenko methods for imaging, Geophysics, 84, F35–F45.Google Scholar

Longuet-Higgins, M.S., 1950. A theory of the origin of microseisms, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 243, 1–35.Google Scholar

Luo, Y., Schuster, G.T., 1991. Wave-equation traveltime inversion, Geophysics, 56, 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, A.E.H., 1911. Some Problems of Geodynamics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lysmer, J., Drake, L., 1972. A finite element method for seismology, Methods in Computational Physics, 11, 181–216, ed. Bolt B.A., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Lythgoe, K.H., Deuss, A., Rudge, J.F., Neufeld, J.A., 2014. Earth’s inner core: Innermost inner core or hemispherical variations?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 385, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ma, S., Beroza, G.C., 2012. Ambient-field Green’s functions from asynchronous seismic observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maggi, A., Tape, C., Chen, M., Chao, D., Tromp, J., 2009. An automated time-window selection algorithm for seismic tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcolm, A.E., Scales, J., van Tiggelen, B.A., 2004. Extracting the Green function from diffuse, equipartitioned waves, Phys. Rev. E, 70, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.015601.Google Scholar

Malcolm, A.E., Trampert, J., 2011. Tomographic errors from wave front healing: more than just a fast bias, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 385–402.Google Scholar

Mancinelli, N.J., Shearer, P.M., 2013. Reconciling discrepancies among estimates of small-scale mantle heterogeneity from PKP precursors. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 1721–1729.Google Scholar

Margerin, L., 2004. Introduction to radiative transfer of seismic waves, in Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms, eds. Levander A., Nolet G., AGU Geophysical Monograph, 157, 229–252.Google Scholar

Marson-Pidgeon, K., Kennett, B.L.N., 2000. Flexible computation of teleseismic synthetics for source and structural studies, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 229–248.Google Scholar

Martin, S., Rietbrock, A., Haberland, C., Asch, G., 2003. Guided waves propagating in subducted oceanic crust, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 108, 2536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, S., Rietbrock, A., 2006. Guided waves at subduction zones: dependencies on slab geometry, receiver locations and earthquake sources. Geophys. J. Int., 167, 693–704.Google Scholar

Masters, G., Laske, G., Bolton, H., Dziewonski, A., 2000. The relative behaviour of shear velocity, bulk sound speed, and compressional velocity in the mantle: implications for chemical and thermal structure, in Earth’s Deep Interior: Mineral Physics and Tomography from the Atomic to the Global Scale. AGU Geophysical Monograph 117, 63–87.Google Scholar

Matharu, G., Sacchi, M., 2019. A subsampled truncated Newton method for multiparameter full-waveform inversion, Geophysics, 84, R333–R340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 1988. Surface waves across 2D structure: a method based on coupled local modes, Geophys. J. Int., 93, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 1992. Modelling of laterally trapped surface waves with application to Rayleigh waves on the Hawaiian swell, Geophys. J. Int., 110, 553–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 2001. A multiple scattering scheme for modelling surface wave propagation in isotropic and anisotropic three-dimensional structures, Geophys. J. Int., 146, 332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 2007. Introduction to mode coupling methods for surface waves, Advances in Geophysics, 48, 127–155.Google Scholar

Megnin, C., Romanowicz, B., 2000. The three-dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher-mode waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, U., Curtis, A., Trampert, J., 2007. Global crustal thickness from neural network inversion of surface wave data, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 706–722.Google Scholar

Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Virieux, J., Operto, S., 2013. Full-waveform inversion and the truncated Newton method, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 35, B401–B437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Mérigot, Q., Oudet, E., Virieux, J., 2016. Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: application to full waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 205, 345–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, M.S., Kennett, B.L.N., Gorbatov, A., 2006. Morphology of the distorted subducted Pacific slab beneath the Hokkaido corner, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 156, 1–11.Google Scholar

Miller, M.S., Niu, F. 2008, Bulldozing the core-mantle boundary: Localized seismic scatterers beneath the Caribbean Sea. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 170, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Halada, L., 2000. 3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes: stability and grid dispersion, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 90, 587–603.Google Scholar

Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Galis, M., 2014. The Finite-Difference Modelling of Earthquake Motions: Waves and Ruptures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Modrak, R., Tromp, J., 2016. Seismic waveform inversion best practices: regional, global and exploration test cases, Geophys. J. Int., 206, 1864–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modrak, R., Borisov, D., Lefebvre, M., Tromp, J., 2018. SeisFlows – flexible waveform inversion software, Comp. Geosci., 115, 88–95.Google Scholar

Montagner, J.-P., Kennett, B.L.N., 1996. How to reconcile body-wave and normal-mode reference Earth models?, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F.A., Masters, G., Engdahl, E.R., Hung, S., 2003. Finite-frequency tomography reveals a variety of plumes in the mantle, Science 303, 338–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mosegaard, K., Tarantola, A., 1995. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12431–12447.Google Scholar

Mosegaard, K., 2012. Limits to nonlinear inversion, Appl. Parallel Sci. Comp, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morozov, I.B., Morozova, E.A. & Smithson, S.B., 1998. On the nature of the teleseismic Pn phase observed in the recordings from the ultra-long-range profile “Quartz”, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, G., 1970. Exact ray theory and its application to the reflection of elastic waves from vertically inhomogeneous media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 21, 261–283.Google Scholar

Nakata, N., Chang, J.P., Lawrence, J.F., Boué, P., 2015. Body-wave extraction and tomography at Long Beach, California, with ambient-noise interferometry, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 120, 1159–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakata, N., Gualtieri, L., Fichtner, A. (eds.), 2019. Seismic Ambient Noise, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakata, N., Nishida, K., 2019. Body wave exploration, 239–266, in Seismic Ambient Noise, eds. Nakata, N., Gualtieri, L., Fichtner, A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Neal, R. M., 2011. MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics, Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, 113–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, L., Thybo, H., Levander, A., Solodilov, L.N., 2003. Origin of upper-mantle seismic scattering – Evidence from Russian peaceful nuclear explosion data. Geophys. J. Int., 154, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nishida, K., Fukao, Y., 2007. Source distribution of Earth’s background free oscillations. J. Geophys. Res., 112, doi: 10.1029/2006JB004720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nishida, K., Montagner, J.-P., Kawakatsu, H., 2009. Global surface wave tomography using seismic hum, Science, 326, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nishida, K., 2013. Global propagation of body waves revealed by cross-correlation analysis of seismic hum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1691–1696.Google Scholar

Nissen-Meyer, T., Fournier, A., Dahlen, F.A., 2007. A two-dimensional spectral-element method for computing spherical-Earth seismograms – I. Moment-tensor source, Geophys. J. Int., 168, 1067–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissen-Meyer, T., van Driel, M., Stähler, S.C., Hosseini, K., Hempel, S., Auer, L., Colombi, A., Fournier, A., 2014. AxiSEM: broadband 3-D seismic wavefields in axisymmetric media, Solid Earth, 5, 425–445.Google Scholar

Nocedal, J., 1980. Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage, Math. Comp., 35, 773–782.Google Scholar

Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J., 1999. Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Nolet, G., Kennett, B.L.N., 1978. Normal mode representations of multiple ray reflections in a spherical Earth, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 53, 219–226.Google Scholar

Nolet, G., 1990. Partitioned waveform inversion and two-dimensional structure under the network of autonomously recording seismographs, J. Geophys. Res, 95, 8499–8512.Google Scholar

Nolet, G., Grand, S., Kennett, B.L.N., 1994. Seismic heterogeneity in the upper mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 23 753–23 766.Google Scholar

Nolet, G., 2006. A Breviary of Seismic Tomography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, .Google Scholar

Nussenveig, H.M., 1965. High frequency scattering by an impenetrable sphere, Ann. Phys., 34, 23–95.Google Scholar

Oikawa, M., Kaneda, K., Nishizawa, A., 2010. Seismic structures of the 154–160 Ma oceanic crust and uppermost mantle in the Northwest Pacific Basin, Earth Planets Space, 62(4), e13–e16.Google Scholar

Oldham, R.D., 1906. The constitution of the Earth as revealed by earthquakes, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 62, 456–476.Google Scholar

Olver, F.W.J., 1974. Asymptotics and Special Functions, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Paitz, P., Sager, K., Fichtner, A., 2019. Rotation and strain ambient noise interferometry, Geophys. J. Int., 216, 1938–1952.Google Scholar

Panning, M., Romanowicz, B., 2006. A three-dimensional radially anisotropic model of shear velocity in the whole mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 361–379.Google Scholar

Parker, T., Shatalin, S., Farhadiroushan, M., 2014, Distributed acoustic sensing – A new tool for seismic applications, First Break, 32(2), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkes, G., Hatton, L., 1986. The Marine Seismic Source, D. Riedel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Pedersen, H.A., Bruneton, M., Maupin, V., 2006. Lithospheric and sublithospheric anisotropy beneath the Baltic shield from surface-wave array analysis, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 244, 590–605.Google Scholar

Pedersen, H.A., Boué, P., Poli, P., Colombi, A., 2015. Arrival angle anomalies of Rayleigh waves observed at a broadband array: a systematic study based on earthquake data, full waveform simulations and noise correlations, Geophys. J. Int., 203, 1626–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pekeris, C. L., 1948. Theory of propagation of explosive sound in shallow water, Geol. Soc. Am. Memoirs, 27.Google Scholar

Peng, Z., Koper, K.D., Vidale, J.E., Leyton, F., .Shearer, P., 2008. Inner-core fine-scale structure from scattered waves recorded by LASA. J. Geophys. Res., 113, B09312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J., 1993. Observations and modeling of seismic background noise. U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Rept., 93-322, 1–95.Google Scholar

Pham, T.-S., Tkalčić, H., 2017. On the feasibility and use of teleseismic P wave coda autocorrelation for mapping shallow seismic discontinuities, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 122, 3776–3791.Google Scholar

Pham, T.-S., Tkalčić, H., 2018. Antarctic ice properties revealed from teleseismic P wave coda autocorrelation, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 123, 7896–7912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pham, T.-S., Tkalčić, H., Sambridge, M., Kennett, B.L.N., 2018. Earth’s Correlation Wavefield: Late coda correlation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3035–3042.Google Scholar

Piromallo, C., Morelli, A., 1997. Imaging the Mediterranean upper mantle by P-wave travel time tomography, Ann. Geophys., 40, 965–979.Google Scholar

Poli, P., Pedersen, H.A., Campillo, M., POLENET/LAPNET working group, 2012a. Emergence of body waves from cross-correlation of short period seismic noise, Geophys. J. Int., 188, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poli, P., Campillo, M., Pedersen, H., LAPNET working group, 2012b. Body-wave imaging of Earth’s mantle discontinuities from ambient seismic noise, Science, 338,1063–1065.Google Scholar

Poli, P., Thomas, C., Campillo, M., Pedersen, H.A., 2015. Imaging the D″ reflector with noise correlations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 60–65.Google Scholar

Poli, P., Campillo, M., de Hoop, M., 2017. Analysis of intermediate period correlations of coda from deep earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 477, 147–155.Google Scholar

Poupinet, G., Kennett, B.L.N., 2004. On the observation of high frequency PKiKP and its coda in Australia, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 146, 497–511.Google Scholar

Pratt, R.G., Shin, C., Hicks, G.J., 1998. Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency domain seismic waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 341–362.Google Scholar

Pratt, R.G., 1999. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model, Geophysics, 64, 888–901.Google Scholar

Pugin, A., Yilmaz, Ö., 2019. Optimum source-receiver orientations to capture PP, PS, SP and SS reflected wave modes, Leading Edge, 38(1), 45–52.Google Scholar

Quarteroni, A., Sacco, R., Saleri, F., 2000. Numerical Mathematics, Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, N., Kennett, B.L.N., 2004. Rapid estimation of relative and absolute delay times across a network by adaptive stacking, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 332–340.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, N., Sambridge, M., 2004. Wave front evolution in strongly heterogeneous layered media using the fast marching method Geophys. J. Int., 156), 631–647Google Scholar

Rawlinson, N., Urvoy, M., 2006. Simultaneous inversion of active and passive source datasets for 3-D seismic structure with application to Tasmania, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L24313, doi:10.1029/2006GL028105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawlinson, N., Fichtner, A., Sambridge, M., Young, M.K., 2014. Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty, Adv. Geophys., 55, 1–76.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, N., Kennett, B.L.N., Salmon, M., Glen, R.A., 2015. Origin of lateral heterogeneities in the upper mantle beneath southeast Australia from seismic tomography, 47–78, in: The Earth’s Heterogeneous Mantle: A Geophysical, Geodynamical, and Geochemical Perspective, eds. Khan, A., Deschamps, F., Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Reading, A., Kennett, B., Sambridge, M., 2003. Improved inversion for seismic structure using transformed S-wavevector receiver functions: Removing the effect of the free surface, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Resovsky, J., Trampert, J., 2003. Using probabilistic seismic tomography to test mantle velocity-density relationships, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 215, 121–134.Google Scholar

Rial, J.A., Cormier, V.F., 1980. Seismic waves at the epicenter’s antipode, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 2661–2668.Google Scholar

Rietmann, M., Grote, M., Peter, D., Schenk, O., 2017. Newmark local time stepping on high-performance computing architectures, J. Comp. Phys., 334, 308–326.Google Scholar

Ritsema, J., van Heijst, H.J., Woodhouse, J.H., 1999. Complex shear wave velocity structure imaged beneath Africa and Iceland, Science, 286, 1925–1928.Google Scholar

Ritsema, J., van Heijst, H.J., 2002. Constraints on the correlation of P- and S-wave velocity heterogeneity in the mantle from P, PP, PPP and PKPab traveltimes, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 482–489.Google Scholar

Ritsema, J., Deuss, A., van Heijst, H.J., Woodhouse, J.H., 2011. S40RTS: a degree-40 shear-velocity model for the mantle from new Rayleigh wave dispersion, teleseismic traveltime and normal-mode splitting function measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 184, 1223–1236,Google Scholar

Ritzwoller, M.H., Feng, L., 2019. Overview of pre- and post-processing of ambient noise correlations, 144–187, in Seismic Ambient Noise, eds. Nakata N., Gualtieri L., Fichtner A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rosenbrock, H.H., 1960. An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function, Comp. J., 3, 175–184.Google Scholar

Rost, S., Earle, P.S., 2010. Identifying regions of strong scattering at the core-mantle boundary from analysis of PKKP precursor energy, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 297, 616–626.Google Scholar

Rost, S., Earle, P.S., Shearer, P.M., Frost, D.A., Selby, N.D., 2015. Seismic detections of small-scale heterogeneities in the deep Earth, 367–390, in: The Earth’s Heterogeneous Mantle: A Geophysical, Geodynamical, and Geochemical Perspective, eds. Khan A. & Deschamps F., Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Roth, M., Korn, M., 1993. Single scattering theory versus numerical modelling in 2-D random media, Geophys. J. Int., 112, 124–140.Google Scholar

Roux, P., Sabra, K., Gerstoft, P., Kuperman, W., 2005. P-waves from cross correlation of seismic noise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L19303.Google Scholar

Roux, P., 2009. Passive seismic imaging with directive ambient noise: application to surface waves and the San Andreas Fault in Parkfield, CA, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 367–373.Google Scholar

Rubin, K.H., Sinton, J.M., Maclennan, J., Hellebrand, E., 2009. Magmatic filtering of mantle compositions at mid-ocean-ridge volcanoes, Nature Geosci., 2, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruigrok, E., Campman, X., Draganov, D., Wapenaar, K., 2010. High-resolution lithospheric imaging with seismic interferometry, Geophys. J. Int., 183, 339–357.Google Scholar

Ruigrok, E., Wapenaar, K., 2012. Global-phase seismic interferometry unveils P-wave reflectivity below the Himalayas and Tibet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sager, K., Boehm, C., Ermert, L., Krischer, L., Fichtner, A., 2018. Sensitivity of seismic noise correlation functions to global noise sources, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 6911–6921.Google Scholar

Sager, K., Boehm, C., Ermert, L., Krischer, L., Fichtner, A., 2020. Global-scale full-waveform ambient noise inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JB018644.Google Scholar

Saito, T., 2010. Love-wave excitation due to the interaction between a propagating ocean wave and the sea-bottom topography, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 1515–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmon, M., Kennett, B.L.N., Stern, T., Aitken, A.R.A., 2013. The Moho in Australia and New Zealand, Tectonophysics, 609, 288–298.Google Scholar

Sambridge, M.S., Tarantola, A., Kennett, B.L.N., 1991. An alternative strategy for the non-linear inversion of seismic waveforms, Geophys. Propsect., 39, 723–726.Google Scholar

Sambridge, M.S., 1999. Geophysical inversion with the neighbourhood algorithm: I. Searching a parameter space, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 479–494.Google Scholar

Sambridge, M.S., Gallagher, K., Jackson, A., Rickwood, P., 2006. Trans-dimensional inverse problems, model comparison, and the evidence, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 528–542.Google Scholar

Santosa, F., Symes, W.W., 1988. Computation of the Hessian for least-squares solutions of inverse problems of reflection seismology, Inverse Problems, 4, 211–233.Google Scholar

Sato, H., Fehler, M.C., Maeda, T., 2012. Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in the Heterogeneous Earth, 2nd edition, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Saygin, E., Kennett, B.L.N., 2010. Ambient noise tomography for the Australian Continent, Tectonophysics, 481, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saygin, E., Kennett, B.L.N., 2012. Crustal structure of Australia from ambient seismic noise tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B01304.Google Scholar

Saygin, E., McQueen, H., Hutton, L., Kennett, B.L.N., Lister, G., 2013. Structure of the Mt. Isa region from seismic ambient noise tomography, Austral. J. Earth Sci., 60, 707–718.Google Scholar

Saygin, E., Kennett, B.L.N., 2019. Retrieval of interstation local body waves from teleseismic coda correlations, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 124, 2957–2969.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, A.J., Lebedev, S., 2013. Global shear speed structure of the upper mantle and transition zone, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 417–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schimmel, M., Paulssen, H., 1997. Noise reduction and detection of weak, coherent signals through phase-weighted stacks, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 497–505.Google Scholar

Schmandt, B., Clayton, R., 2013. Analysis of P-waves with a 5200-station array in Long Beach, California: evidence for abrupt boundary for Inner Borderland rifting, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 1–19.Google Scholar

Schmerr, N., 2012. The Gutenberg discontinuity: melt at the Lithosphere–Asthenosphere boundary, Science, 335, 1480–1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schultz, P.S., 1982. A method for direct estimation of interval velocities, Geophysics, 47, 1657–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuster, G., 2009. Seismic Interferometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sens-Schönfelder, C., Snieder, R., Stähler, S.C., 2015. The lack of equipartitioning in global body wave coda, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7483–7489.Google Scholar

Sens-Schönfelder, C., Brenguier, F., 2018. Noise-based monitoring, 267–301, in Seismic Ambient Noise, eds. Nakata, N., Gualtieri, L., Fichtner, A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sereno, T.J., Orcutt, J.A., 1985. Synthesis of realistic oceanic Pn wavetrains, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12 755–12 776.Google Scholar

Shanno, D.F., 1970. Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization, Math. Comp., 24, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, N.M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., Ritzwoller, M.H., 2005. High resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science, 307, 1615–1618.Google Scholar

Shapiro, N., 2019. Applications with surface waves extracted from ambient seismic noise, 218–238, in Seismic Ambient Noise, eds. Nakata N., Gualtieri L., Fichtner A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shearer, P.M., Hedlin, M.A.H., Earle, P.S., 1998. PKP and PKKP precursor observations: Implications for the small-scale structure of the deep mantle and core, in: The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, AGU Geodynamics Monograph 28, 37–55.Google Scholar

Shearer, P.M., Earle, P.S., 2008. Observing and modeling elastic scattering in the deep Earth. Advances in Geophysics, 50, 167–193.Google Scholar

Shearer, P.M., Rychert, C.A., Liu, Q., 2011, On the visibility of the inner-core shear wave phase PKJKP at long periods, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 1379–1383.Google Scholar

Shearer, P.M., 2017. Deep Earth structure: Seismic scattering in the deep Earth. Treatise on Geophysics Vol. I (second edition), 759–787, Elsevier, Amsterdam,Google Scholar

Shen, W., Ritzwoller, M.H., 2016. Crustal and uppermost mantle structure beneath the United States, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 121, 4306–4342.Google Scholar

Shintaku, N., Forsyth, D.W., Hajewski, C.J., Weeraratne, D.S., 2014. Pn anisotropy in Mesozoic western Pacific lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 119, 3050–3063.Google Scholar

Shirzad, T., Shomali, Z.-H., 2015. Extracting seismic body and Rayleigh waves from the ambient seismic noise using the rms-stacking method, Seism. Res. Lett., 86, 1–8.Google Scholar

Shito, A., Suetsugu, D., Furumura, T., Sugioka, H., Ito, A., 2013. Small scale heterogeneities in the oceanic lithosphere inferred from guided waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1708–1712.Google Scholar

Sieminski, A., Trampert, J., Tromp, J., 2009. Principal component analysis of anisotropic finite-frequency kernels, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1186–1198.Google Scholar

Sigloch, K., Nolet, G., 2006. Measuring finite-frequency body wave amplitudes and travel times, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 271–287.Google Scholar

Sippl, C., 2016. Moho geometry along a north-south passive seismic transect through Central Australia, Tectonophysics, 676, 56–69.Google Scholar

Sippl, C., Brisbout, L., Spaggiari, C., Gessner, K., Tkalčić, H., Kennett, B.L.N., Murdie, R., 2017a. Crustal structure of a Proterozoic craton boundary: East Albany-Fraser Orogen, Western Australia, imaged with passive seismic and gravity anomaly data, Precambrian Res., 296, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sippl, C., Kennett, B.L.N., Tkalčić, H., Gessner, K., Spaggiari, C., 2017b. Crustal surface-wave velocity structure of the east Albany-Fraser Orogen, Western Australia, from ambient noise recordings, Geophys. J. Int., 210, 1641–1651.Google Scholar

Slob, E., Wapenaar, K., Broggini, F., Snieder, R., 2014. Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko-type equations, Geophysics, 79, S63–S76.Google Scholar

Snieder, R., 1986. 3-D linearized scattering of surface waves and a formalism for surface wave tomography, Geophys. J. Astr. Soc., 84, 581–605.Google Scholar

Snieder, R., 2004. Extracting the Green’s function from the correlation of coda waves: A derivation based on stationary phase, Phys. Rev. E., 69, 046610.Google Scholar

Snieder, R., Van Wijk, K., Haney, M., Calvert, R., 2008. Cancellation of spurious arrivals in Green’s function extraction and the generalized optical theorem, Phys. Rev. E, 78, 1–8.Google Scholar

Snieder, R., Sens-Schönfelder, C., 2015. Seismic interferometry and stationary phase at caustics, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 120, 4333–4343.Google Scholar