Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:18:48.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Forward Exchange Rates in a Model with Segmented Goods Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Piet Sercu
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Raman Uppal
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter our focus was the spot exchange rate. In this chapter we study the relation between forward exchange rates, spot exchange rates, and interest rates. In particular, we examine the effect of segmented commodity markets on the relation between the forward exchange rate premium and the change in the future spot rate.

The relation between forward exchange rates and future spot rates has been the subject of numerous studies. Empirical tests typically find that when one regresses changes in spot rates on forward premia, the slope coefficient is less than one and often negative. This result is called the forward bias puzzle. For example, Froot and Thaler (1990) report in their survey that the average co-efficient on the forward premium, across seventy-five studies, is –0.88. Other surveys of this literature can be found in Baillie and McMahon (1989b), Engel (1994), Hodrick (1987), Lewis (1995), and Marston (1995).

In this chapter our objective is to examine the effect of segmentation of international commodity markets on the relation between the forward premium and the change in the spot rate. Segmentation of commodity markets gives rise to PPP deviations, which are an important feature of exchange rate data. Typically, the theoretical models that have been used to analyze predictable deviations from uncovered interest parity (UIP) have assumed that PPP holds. However, empirical studies such as Bekaert (1994), Canova (1991), Gokey (1994), Levine (1989, 1991), and Mishkin (1984) find that predictable deviations from PPP are highly correlated with predictable violations of UIP; Engel (1994) provides a discussion of these tests.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×