The public–private dualities of international investment law and arbitration

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139043809.010

5 - The public–private dualities of international investment law and arbitration

from Part II - Shifts in fundamental character

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011

Alex Mills

Edited by

Chester Brown and

Kate Miles

Show author details

Chester Brown: Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Kate Miles: Affiliation:
University of Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Summary

And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!

Introduction

In recent years the thousands of international investment treaties in existence have given rise to hundreds of investor–State arbitrations. International investment law has thus become a topic of great practical importance, and one which has received significant attention in both arbitral awards and academic literature. The quotation of poetically undistinguished verse above is intended to imply, somewhat mischievously, that some of this attention has been not entirely dissimilar to the observations of the fabled (blind) ‘men of Indostan’ concerning the nature of an elephant – each perceiving different aspects of the subject at hand (for example, a tusk, the trunk, or a knee of the elephant), but insufficiently embracing the complexity of the whole (determining that an elephant is like a spear, a snake, or a tree, respectively). The complexity of international investment law is, however, not that of a whole made of variable parts (like an elephant), but of a whole which is itself open to different interpretations, which possesses inherent ‘dualities’ – a closer analogy might be with an optical illusion, a single image or object which may appear strikingly different to different viewers or from different perspectives.

The dualities of international investment law are presented in some of the most fundamental questions concerning its nature and purpose. This chapter explores the ideas or influences which lead analysis of the subject in conflicting directions and invite these seemingly contradictory viewpoints, by focusing on the ‘public–private’ distinctions or conceptions which lie at its contested foundations. These public–private dualities thus form a kind of conceptual lens through which international investment law may be viewed, and through which its different appearances or representations can be examined.

Type: Chapter
Information: Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration , pp. 97 - 116

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chinkin, C.‘A critique of the public/private dimension’European Journal of International Law 10 1999 387CrossRef Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H.‘Worlds apart: Public/private distinctions in international law’Thornton, M.Public and Private: Feminist legal debatesOxford University Press 1995Google Scholar

Mills, A.The Confluence of Public and Private International Law: Justice, pluralism and subsidiarity in the international constitutional ordering of private lawCambridge University Press 2009 94CrossRef Google Scholar

Schill, S.The Multilateralization of International Investment LawCambridge University Press 2009 375CrossRef Google Scholar

Montt, S.State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global constitutional and administrative law in the BIT generationOxfordHart Publishing 2009Google Scholar

van Harten, G.Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public LawOxford University Press 2007Google Scholar

van Harten, G.Loughlin, M.‘Investment treaty arbitration as a species of global administrative law’European Journal of International Law 17 2006 121CrossRef Google Scholar

Kishoiyian, B.‘The utility of bilateral investment treaties in the formulation of customary international law’Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 14 1994 327Google Scholar

Yackee, J. W.‘Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment, and the rule of (international) law: Do BITs promote foreign direct investment?’Law and Society Review 42 2008 815CrossRef Google Scholar

Wälde, T.‘Interpreting investment treaties: Experiences and examples’Binder, C.Kriebaum, U.Reinisch, A.Wittich, S.International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in honour of Christoph SchreuerOxford University Press 2009 724CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilske, S.Raible, M.‘The arbitrator as guardian of international public policy? Should arbitrators go beyond solving legal issues?’Rogers, C. A.Alford, R. P.The Future of Investment ArbitrationOxford University Press 2009 249Google Scholar

Haas, P. M.‘Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination’International Organization 46 1992 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Schill, S.‘Crafting the international economic order: The public function of investment treaty arbitration and its significance for the role of the arbitrator’Leiden Journal of International Law 23 2010 401CrossRef Google Scholar

Kessedjian, C.‘To give or not to give precedential value to investment arbitration awards?’Rogers, C. A.Alford, R. P.The Future of Investment ArbitrationOxford University Press 2009 43Google Scholar

Weiniger, M.‘Symposium: Precedent in investment arbitration’Transnational Dispute Management 5 2008

Cheng, T.-H.‘Precedent and control in investment treaty arbitration’Fordham International Law Journal 30 2007 1014Google Scholar

Franck, S. D.‘The legitimacy crisis in investment arbitration: Privatizing public international law through inconsistent decisions’Fordham Law Review 73 2005 1521Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T.‘Third party participation in investment arbitration’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 2010 373CrossRef Google Scholar

Asteriti, A.Tams, C. J.‘Transparency and representation of the public interest in investment treaty arbitration’Schill, S.International Investment Law and Comparative Public LawOxford University Press 2010 787CrossRef Google Scholar

Born, G.Shenkman, E.‘Confidentiality and transparency in commercial and investor–State international arbitration’Rogers, C. A.Alford, R. P.The Future of Investment ArbitrationOxford University Press 2009 5Google Scholar

O'Hara, E. A.Ribstein, L.The Law MarketOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Elkins, Z.Guzman, A. T.Simmons, B. A.‘Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000’International Organisation 60 2006 811CrossRef Google Scholar

Stephan, P. B.‘The futility of unification and harmonization in international commercial law’Virginia Journal of International Law 39 1999 743Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T.‘Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties’Virginia Journal of International Law 38 1998 639Google Scholar

Sasson, M.Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The unsettled relationship between international law and municipal lawThe HagueKluwer 2010Google Scholar

Schill, S.‘Enabling private ordering: Function, scope and effect of umbrella clauses in international investment treaties’Minnesota Journal of International Law 18 2009 1Google Scholar

Dolzer, R.Schreuer, C.Principles of International Investment LawOxford University Press 2008CrossRef Google Scholar

Crawford, J.‘Treaty and contract in investment arbitration’Arbitration International 24 2008 351CrossRef Google Scholar

McLachlan, C.Shore, L.Weiniger, M.International Investment Arbitration: Substantive principlesOxford University Press 2007CrossRef Google Scholar

Wälde, T.‘The “umbrella” clause in investment arbitration’Journal of World Investment and Trade 6 2005 183Google Scholar

Douglas, Z.‘The hybrid foundations of investment treaty arbitration’British Yearbook of International Law 74 2003 151CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D.Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment rules and democracy's promiseCambridge University Press 2008Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M.The International Law on Foreign InvestmentCambridge University Press 2010 50CrossRef Google Scholar

Yannaca-Small, K.‘Fair and equitable treatment standard: Recent developments’Reinisch, A.Standards of Investment ProtectionOxford University Press 2008Google Scholar

Tudor, I.The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign InvestmentOxford University Press 2008CrossRef Google Scholar