Book contents
- The Evolution, Acquisition, and Development of Syntax
- The Evolution, Acquisition, and Development of Syntax
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Evolution of Syntax
- Part II The Acquisition of Syntax
- Part III The Development of Syntax
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2025
Book contents
- The Evolution, Acquisition, and Development of Syntax
- The Evolution, Acquisition, and Development of Syntax
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Evolution of Syntax
- Part II The Acquisition of Syntax
- Part III The Development of Syntax
- Index
- References
Summary
“Syntax lies at the very heart of what it means to be human” (Bickerton & Szathmary 2009: xviii). It has been argued that no other species has been able to acquire a rudimentary syntax, thus reinforcing the view that acquiring syntax is a unique ability of humans (Bickerton & Szathmary 2009). The present volume describes the current state of the discussion on syntax with a special focus on Creole languages. It sheds light on the relevance of syntax in Language by bringing together scholars from the fields of language evolution, language acquisition and development of young languages, that is, Creoles.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Evolution, Acquisition and Development of SyntaxInsights from Creole Languages and Beyond, pp. 1 - 8Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Adone, D. (2005). Acquisition without a language model: The case of Mauritian Home Sign. BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston: Cascadilla Press, pp. 12–33.Google Scholar
Baptista, M. (2006). When substrates meet superstrate: The case of Cape Verdean Creole. In Lang, J., Holm, J., Rougé, J.-L. and Soares, M. J. (eds.), Cabo Verde – Origens da sua Sociedade e do seu Crioulo. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Baptista, M. (2009). Selection and competition in creole formation: A case study. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (Selected papers from NWaV 35), 13(2), 38–50.Google Scholar
Baptista, M. (2020). Competition, selection, and the role of congruence in Creole genesis and development. Language, 96(1), 160–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1980). Decreolization and the creole continuum. In Valdman, A. and Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies. New York: Academic Press, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1999). How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from Creoles. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language Creation and Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2008). Bastard Tongues: A Trailblazing Linguist Finds Clues to Our Common Humanity in the World’s Lowliest Languages. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2014). More than Nature Needs: Language, Mind and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2016). Roots of Language (Classics in Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D., and Szathmáry, E. (eds.). (2009). Biological Foundations and Origins of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lisser, T., Durrleman, S., Rizzi, L. and Shlonsky, U. (2016). The acquisition of Jamaican Creole: Null subject phenomenon. Language Acquisition, 23, 261–292. http://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2015.1115049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N. (ed.). (2012). Agency in the Emergence of Creole Languages: The Role of Women, Renegades, and People of African and Indigenous Descent in the Emergence of the Colonial Era Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N. et al. (2014). Creoles and acts of identity: Convergence and multiple voicing in the Atlantic Creoles. PAPIA, 24(1), 173–198.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). The interlingual identification of Spanish and English vowels: Orthographic evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(3), 701–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kresić, M., and Gulan, T. (2012). Interlingual identifications and assessment of similarities between L1, L2, and L3: Croatian learners’ use of modal particles and equivalent modal elements. Second Language Learning and Teaching, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscati, V. (2020). Children (and some adults) overgeneralize negative concord: The case of fragment answers to negative questions in Italian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 26(1), 169–178.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (2020). Negation and first language acquisition. In Déprez, V. and Espinal, M. T., (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar