Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T09:33:57.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - From Protolanguage to Deuterolanguage: The Importance of Compounds

from Part I - The Evolution of Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2025

By
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Edited by
Dany Adone  and
Astrid Gabel
Dany Adone
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Astrid Gabel
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access

Summary

Carstairs-McCarthy’s chapter explores Jackendoff’s suggestion that exuberant compounding of the kind that is possible in English may be a ‘coelacanth of language’, that is a relic of a pre-syntactic stage of linguistic evolution. In support of this view, he contrasts English compounding possibilities with those of other Germanic languages and French, where compounds typically involve more than mere juxtaposition. The peculiar characteristics of compounding help to explain the ambiguity of the term ‘lexical’, used to mean both ‘listed in the lexicon’ and ‘relating to words’.

Keywords

language evolutioncompoundingprotolanguagedeuterolanguagepre-syntactic stageEnglish/Germanic languages and French
Type
Chapter
Information
The Evolution, Acquisition and Development of Syntax
Insights from Creole Languages and Beyond
 , pp. 34 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, L. (2009). IE, Germanic: Danish. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 400–16.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (2017). Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. and Plag, I. (eds.). (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2007). Language evolution: a brief guide for linguists. Lingua, 117, 510–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2014). More than Nature Needs: Language, Mind, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. (2009). Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 491–511.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1992). Current Morphology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2001). ASL ‘syllables’ and language evolution: a response to Uriagereka. Language, 77, 343–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2010). The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2014). Review of Bauer et al. (2013). Morphology, 24, 125–34.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2018). An Introduction to English Morphology, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. and Seyfarth, R. (1990). How Monkeys See the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M. and Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Don, J. (2009). IE, Germanic: Dutch. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 370–85.Google Scholar
Fradin, B. (2009). IE, Romance: French. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 417–35.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2009). Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–28.Google Scholar
Kornfeld, L. M. (2009). IE, Romance: Spanish. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 436–52.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 251–85.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.). (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. (1991). Morphology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neef, M. (2009). IE, Germanic: German. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 386–99.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1976). Morphological aspects of nominal compounding in German and certain other languages: what to acquire in language acquisition in case the rules fail? In Drachman, G. (ed.), Akten des 1. Salzburger Kolloquium über Kindersprache: Salzburg vom 6. bis 8. Dez. 1974. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 201–19.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. and Siegel, M. (1978). A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 199–260.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. (1998). On the autonomy of compounding morphology. In Lapointe, S. G., Brentari, D. K. and Farrell, P. M. (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 161–87.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1982). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M. (2005). Initial syntax and modern syntax: did the clause evolve from the syllable? In Tallerman, M., ed., Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2001). Review of Carstairs-McCarthy 1999. Language 77 (2001), 368–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×