Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-04T07:24:48.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Broken Windows: Creoles, Pidgins, and Language Evolution

from Part I - The Evolution of Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2025

By
Paul T. Roberge
Edited by
Dany Adone  and
Astrid Gabel
Dany Adone
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Astrid Gabel
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access

Summary

Roberge’s chapter presents Bickerton’s creolisation as a catastrophic single-generation process that obtains from first language acquisition in abnormal circumstances. In the ‘interesting’ cases, at least, a pidgin provides the primary linguistic data, and an innate biological program of linguistic competence shapes the result. On this view (i) the formation of these languages points directly to humankind’s biological capacity to create language should the normal generation-to-generation means of transmission be disrupted; and (ii) creoles provide the most direct window possible on the properties of the human language faculty. In his chapter Roberge chronicles the development and reception of Bickerton’s creole and pidgin windows on the origin and evolution of language in our species through their entire arc. While posterity has firmly rejected Bickerton’s creole window on early human language, Roberge argues that the pidgin window, at least, holds some heuristic potential, though a great deal of work remains to be done.

Keywords

language evolutionwindows approachcreole windowpidgin windowcreolisation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Evolution, Acquisition and Development of Syntax
Insights from Creole Languages and Beyond
 , pp. 74 - 95
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboh, E., and DeGraff, M. (2017). A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In Roberts, I. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 401–58.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A. (2017). Toward the language-ready brain: Biological evolution and primate comparison. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (1991). Causes and effects. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 6, 267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (1995). Motivation in creole genesis. In Baker, P. (ed.), From Contact to Creole and Beyond. London: University of Westminster Press, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (1997). Directionality in pidginization and creolization. In Spears, A. and Winford, D. (eds.), The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2009). Productive bimorphemic structures and the concept of gradual creolization. In Selbach, R., Cardoso, H. C., and van den Berg, M. (eds.), Gradual Creolization: Studies Celebrating Jacques Arends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P. (2003). Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In Booij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, S. (2009). The emergence of temporality: From restricted linguistic systems to early human language. In Botha, R. P. and de Swart, H. (eds.), Language Evolution: The View from Restricted Linguistic Systems. Utrecht: LOT, pp. 21–57.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1979). Beginnings. In Hill, K. C. (ed.), The Genesis of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–88, 212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1988). Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–84.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1989). The lexical learning hypothesis and the pidgin-creole cycle. In Pütz, M. and Dirven, R. (eds.), Wheels within Wheels: Papers of the Duisburg Symposium on Pidgin and Creole Languages. Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1990). Language & Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1991). On the supposed “gradualness” of creole development. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 6, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and Human Behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1998). Catastrophic evolution: The case for a single step from protolanguage to full human language. In Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Knight, C., (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–58.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1999). How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language Creation and Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2004). Reconsidering Creole exceptionalism. Language, 80, 828–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D.. (2006). Creoles, capitalism, and colonialism. In Clements, J. C., Klingler, T. A., Piston-Hatlen, D., and Rottet, K. J. (eds.), History, Society and Variation: In Honor of Albert Valdman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–52.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2007). Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists. Lingua, 117, 510–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2008). Bastard Tongues: A Trailblazing Linguist Finds Clues to Our Common Humanity in the World’s Lowliest Languages. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2010). On two incompatible theories of language evolution. In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., and Yamakido, H. (eds.), The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2012). The origins of syntactic language. In Tallerman, M. and Gibson, K. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 456–68.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.. (2014). More than Nature Needs: Language, Mind, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2016). Preface to the 2016 edition. Roots of Language. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (2009). Theoretical underpinnings of inferences about language evolution: The syntax used at Blombos Cave. In Botha, R. and Knight, C. (eds.), The Cradle of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, R. P. (2016). Language Evolution: The Windows Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, R. P., and de Swart, H. (eds.). (2009). Language Evolution: The View from Restricted Linguistic Systems. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Calvin, W. H., and Bickerton, D. (2000). Lingua ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2012). The evolutionary relevance of more and less complex forms of language. In Tallerman, and Gibson, (eds.), pp. 469–78.Google Scholar
Chater, N., and Christiansen, M. H. (2012). A solution to the logical problem of language evolution: Language as an adaptation to the human brain. In Tallerman, M. and Gibson, K. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 626–39.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Clements, J. C. (2019). Speech communities, language varieties, and typology: Acquisition and the building of pronominal systems. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 34, 148–61.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (2000). From potential to realization: An episode in the origin of language. Linguistics, 38, 989–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (ed.). (1999). Language Creation and Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2003). Against Creole exceptionalism. Language, 79, 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2004). Against Creole exceptionalism (redux). Language, 80, 834–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 34, 533–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2020). Toward racial justice in linguistics: The case of Creole studies. Language, 96, e292–e306. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drechsel, E. J. (2019). In memory of Derek Bickerton (1926–2018). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 34, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2010). The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, W. T. (2017). Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2009). The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2018). On Understanding Grammar, rev. ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazaël-Massieux, M.-C. (2009). Change in the possessive system of French Caribbean Creole languages. In Selbach, R., Cardoso, H. C., and van den Berg, M. (eds.), Gradual Creolization: Studies Celebrating Jacques Arends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–28.Google Scholar
Heine, B., and Kuteva, T. (2007). The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. A. (1988). Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (2015). Review of Bickerton (2014). Language, 91, 485–88.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1999). Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 272–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of Language: Constraints and Hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihm, A. (2002). Langues créoles et origine du langage: État de la question. Langages, 36, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S., and Singler, J. V. (eds.). (2008). The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C. (2013). On the relevance of pidgins and creoles in the debate on the origins of language. In Lefebvre, C., Comrie, B., and Cohen, H. (eds.), New Perspectives on the Origins of Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 441–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (2006). How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. (2005). Defining Creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. (2009). Holistic communication and the co-evolution of language and music: Resurrecting an old idea. In Botha, R. and Knight, C. (eds.), The Prehistory of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (1991). Language genesis and human evolution. Diachronica, 8, 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2002). Competition and selection in language evolution. Selection, 3, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2008). What do creoles and pidgins tell us about the evolution of language? In Laks, B., Cleuziou, S., Demoule, J.-P., and Encrevé, P. (eds.), Origin and Evolution of Languages: Approaches, Models, Paradigms. London: Equinox, pp. 272–97.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2015). The emergence of creoles and language change. In Bonvillain, N. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 348–65.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. (1997). Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, 2nd ed. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (1988). Are creoles a special type of language? In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.). (1988). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2003). Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In Christiansen, M. H and Kirby, S. (eds.), Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, P. T. (2009). The creation of pidgins as a possible window on language evolution. In Botha, R. P. and de Swart, H. (eds.), Language Evolution: The View from Restricted Linguistic Systems. Utrecht: LOT, pp. 101–37.Google Scholar
Roberge, P. T. (2012). Pidgins, creoles, and the creation of language. In Tallerman, M. and Gibson, K. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 537–44.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. J. (2000). Nativization and the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. In McWhorter, J. (ed.), Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbach, R., Cardoso, H. C., and van den Berg, M. (eds.). (2009). Gradual Creolization: Studies Celebrating Jacques Arends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singler, J. V. (2008). The sociohistorical context of creole genesis. In Kouwenberg, S. and Singler, J. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 332–58.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2002). Language evolution, acquisition and diachrony: Probing the parallels. In Givón, T. and Malle, B. F. (eds.), The Evolution of Language out of Pre-language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 375–92.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M. (2012). Protolanguage. In Tallerman, M. and Gibson, K. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 479–91.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M., and Gibson, K. R. (eds.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, T. (2008). Creole genesis: The impact of the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. In Kouwenberg, S. and Singler, J. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 219–41.Google Scholar
Velupillai, V. (2015). Pidgins, Creoles and Mixed Languages: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×