Adrogue, Sofia, “The Post-Daubert Court: ‘Amateur Scientist’ Gatekeeper or Executioner?” Houston Lawyer 35 (1998): 10–16.Google Scholar

Aitken, Colin, Roberts, Paul, and Jackson, Graham, Fundamentals of Probability and Statistical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance for Judges, Lawyers, Forensic Scientists and Expert Witnesses (London: Royal Statistical Society, 2010).Google Scholar

Allen, Arthur, Vaccine: The Controversial Story of Medicine’s Greatest Lifesaver (New York: W. W. Norton, 2007).Google Scholar

Allen, Michael E., Florida Criminal Procedure (Eagan, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2010).Google Scholar

Allen, Ronald J., “A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials,” Boston University Law Review 66 (1986): 401–37. Reprinted in Tillers and Green, eds., Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence, 21–60. [Page references are to the reprinted version.]Google Scholar

Allen, Ronald J., “Expertise and the Daubert Decision,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 84, no.4 (1994): 1157–75.Google Scholar

Altman, Lawrence K., “For Science’s Gatekeepers, a Credibility Gap,” New York Times, May 2, 2006, F1.

American Bar Association, Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, Guideline 10.7, 76 (revised ed., Feb. 2003), available at .

American Medical Association, .

American Society for Microbiology, .

Andrewes, A., “The Growth of the Athenian State,” in Boardman, John and Hammond, N. G. L., eds., Cambridge Ancient Histories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), III, Part 3, The Expansion of the Greek World, Eighth to Sixth Centuries B.C., chapter 43, 360–91.Google Scholar

Angell, Marcia, “Is Scientific Medicine for Sale?” New England Journal of Medicine 342 (2000): 1516–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Angier, Natalie, “High Court to Consider Rules on Use of Scientific Evidence,” New York Times, January 2, 1993, 1, available at ProQuest Historical NewspapersThe New York Times (1851–2003).Google Scholar

Annas, George J., and Grodin, Michael A., The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremburg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Anonymous, The Sacco and Vanzetti Case: Transcript of the Record of the Trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolemeo Vanzetti in the Courts of Massachusetts and Subsequent Proceedings, 1920–27 (Mamaroneck, NY: Paul P. Appel, 1969).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Metaphysics, trans. Ross, W. D., in McKeon, Richard, ed., The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941), 689–935.Google Scholar

Armitage, Peter, “Bradford Hill and the Randomized Controlled Trial,” Pharmaceutical Medicine 6 (1992): 23–37.Google Scholar

Armitage, Peter, “Austin Bradford Hill” (version 3), StatProb: The Encyclopedia Sponsored by Statistics and Probability Societies (n.d.), available at .

Armstrong, David, “Bitter Pill: How the New England Journal of Medicine Missed Warning Signs in Vioxx—Medical Weekly Waited Years to Report Flaws in Article That Praised Pain Drug—Merck Seen as ‘Punching Bag,’” Wall Street Journal, May 15, 2006, A1, A10.Google Scholar

Austen, Jane, Pride and Prejudice (1813), in The Works of Jane Austen (London: Spring Books, 1966), 171–343.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., “On Truth,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 24 (1950): 111–28. Reprinted in Urmson, and Warnock, , eds., Philosophical Papers of J. L. Austin, 85–101, and in Pitcher, George, ed., Truth (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1950), 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L., “Performative Utterances” (from a talk given on BBC Radio, 1956), in Urmson and Warnock, eds., Philosophical Papers of J. L. Austin, 220–39.

Austin, J. L., Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Avery, Oswald T., MacCleod, Colin M., and McCarty, Maclyn, “Studies of the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation in Pneumococcal Types,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 79 (1994):137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayala, Francisco J., and Black, Bert, “Science and the Courts,” American Scientist, 81 (June 1, 1993): 230–39.Google Scholar

Ayer, A.J., Language, Truth and Logic (London: Victor Gollancz Ltd., 1936).Google Scholar

Ayer, A.J., ed., Logical Positivism (New York: Free Press, 1959).

Ayer, A. J., “Truth, Verification and Verisimilitude,” in Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 2, 684–92.

Bacon, Francis, The Advancement of Learning (1605), in Montagu, Basil, ed., The Works of Francis Bacon (London: William Pickering, 1825), vol. II.Google Scholar

Bailar, John C., “Reliability, Fairness, Objectivity and Other Inappropriate Goals in Peer Review,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1991): 137–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Linda A., Gordis, Leon, and Green, Michael D., “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 1st ed., 123–80.

Bandow, Doug, “Keeping Junk Science Out of the Courtroom,” Wall Street Journal, July 26, 1999, A23.Google Scholar

Barry, John M., The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History (New York: Penguin Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Bartlett, Robert, Trial by Fire and Water: The Medieval Judicial Ordeal (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Beecher-Monas, Erica, and Garcia-Rill, Edgar, “Genetic Predictions of Future Dangerousness: Is There a Blueprint for Violence?” Law & Contemporary Problems 69 (2006): 301–41.Google Scholar

Begley, Sharon, “Despite Its Reputation, Fingerprint Evidence Isn’t Really Infallible,” Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2004, B1.Google Scholar

Begley, Sharon, “Science Journals Artfully Try to Boost Their Rankings,” Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2006, B1, B8.Google ScholarPubMed

Begley, Sharon, and Rogers, Adam, “War of the Worlds: There Are No Little Green Men on Mars. But There Are Some Very Hostile Fellows on Earth Debating Whether There Was Life on the Red Planet,” Newsweek, February 10, 1997, 56–58.Google Scholar

Behe, Michael J., Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (New York: Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Benedict, Jeff, No Bone Unturned: The Adventures of a Top Smithsonian Forensic Scientist and the Legal Battle for American’s Oldest Skeletons (New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

“Bendectin: FDA Approved Drugs,” available at .

Bentham, Jeremy, A Treatise on Judicial Evidence, ed. Dumont, M. (1825; Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman and Co., 1981).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, Rationale of Judicial Evidence (London: Hunt and Clarke, 1827; New York: Garland, 1978). (5 vols.)Google Scholar

Berenson, Alex, “Merck Admits a Data Error on Vioxx,” New York Times, May 3, 2006, C1, available at 2006 WLNR 9291555.

Berger, Margaret, “Lessons from DNA: Restriking the Balance Between Finality and Justice,” in Lazer, David, ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice, 109–131.

Bergmann, Gustav, Philosophy of Science (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Alan, “Crime Lab Scandal Leaves Prosecutor Feeling Betrayed: Owmby Says Sutton Case Tests Faith in Justice System,” Houston Chronicle, May 16, 2003, 23.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard B., “Introduction,” in Bernstein, , ed., The Constitution of the United States with the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation (New York: Barnes and Noble, 2002), 5–25.Google Scholar

Bero, Lisa A., et al., “The Publication of Sponsored Symposiums in Medical Journals,” New England Journal of Medicine 327 (1992): 1135–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berry, John M., The Great Influenza (New York: Penguin Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Beyea, Jan, and Berger, Daniel, “Scientific Misconceptions among Daubert Gatekeepers: The Need for Reform of Expert Review Procedures,” Law & Contemporary Problems 64 (2001): 327–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billings, John Shaw, “Literature and Institutions,” American Journal of Medical Science 72 (1876): 439–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Bert, Ayala, Francisco J., and Saffran-Brinks, Carol, “Science and Law in the Wake of Daubert: A New Search for Scientific Knowledge,” Texas Law Review 72, no.4 (1994): 715–802.Google Scholar

Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 6th ed., 1990).Google Scholar

Black, Max, “Probability,” in Edwards, Paul, ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: MacMillan Publishing Co. Inc., and the Free Press, 1967), vol. 6, 464–79.Google Scholar

Bombadier, Claire, et al., “Comparison of Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Rofecoxib and Naproxen in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” New England Journal of Medicine 343, no.21 (2000): 1520–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bondurant, Stuart, Ernster, Virginia, and Herdman, Roger, eds. Safety of Silicone Breast Implants (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000) (e-book, available at ).Google Scholar

Bone and Cancer Foundation, “Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ),” available at .

Bonetta, Laura, “The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud,” Cell 124, no.5 (March 10, 2006): 873–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boole, George, The Laws of Thought (1854; reprinted New York: Dover, n.d.).Google Scholar

Borghetti, Jean-Sébastien, “Litigation on Hepatitis B Vaccination and Demyelinating Disease in France: Breaking Through Scientific Uncertainty in France,” in Diego Papayannis, ed., Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Boyer, Peter J., “Annals of Justice: DNA on Trial,” New Yorker, January 17, 2000, 42–53.

Bradley, F. H., Ethical Studies (London: Henry S. King and Co., 1876).Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H., Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1895).Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H., Essays on Truth and Reality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914).Google Scholar

Brent, Robert L., “Bendectin: Review of the Medical Literature of a Comprehensively Studied Human Nonteratogen and the Most Prevalent Tortogen-Litigen,” Reproductive Toxicology 9, no.4 (1995): 337–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brent, Robert L., “Litigation-Produced Pain, Disease, and Suffering: An Experience with Congenital Malformation Lawsuits,” Teratology 16, no.1 (1997):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brent, Robert L., “Response to Dr. Stuart Newman’s Commentary on an Article Entitled ‘Bendectin: Review of the Medical Literature of a Comprehensively Studied Human Nonteratogen and the Most Prevalent Tortogen-Litigen,’” Reproductive Toxicology 13, no.4 (1999): 245–53.Google Scholar

Brent, Robert L., “Bendectin and Birth Defects: Hopefully, the Final Chapter,” Birth Defects Research Part A, 67, no.2, (2003): 79–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bresalier, Robert S., et al., “Cardiovascular Events Associated with Rofecoxib in a Colorectal Adenoma Chemoprevention Trial,” New England Journal of Medicine 352 (2005): 1092–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresalier, Robert S., et al., “Correction” (to “Cardiovascular Events Associated with Rofecoxib in a Colorectal Adenoma Chemoprevention Trial”), New England Journal of Medicine 355 (2006): 221.Google Scholar

Bridgman, Percy W., “The Struggle for Intellectual Integrity” (1933), in Bridgman, Reflections of a Physicist, 361–79.

Bridgman, Percy W., “On ‘Scientific Method’” (1949), in Bridgman, Reflections of a Physicist, 81–83.

Bridgman, Percy W., Reflections of a Physicist (New York: Philosophical Library, 2nd ed., 1955).Google Scholar

Broad, William, and Wade, Nicholas, Betrayers of the Truth (New York: Simon and Schuster, Touchstone Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Brodin, Mark S., “Behavioral Science Evidence in the Age of Daubert: Reflections of a Skeptic,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 73 (2005): 862–943.Google Scholar

Broun, Kenneth S., et al., eds., McCormick on Evidence (St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2006) (2 vols.).Google Scholar

Brown, Harvey (Judge), “Eight Gates for Expert Witnesses,” Houston Law Review 36 (1999): 743–882.Google Scholar

Bryant, Dianne, et al., “How Many Patients? How Many Limbs? Analysis of Patients or Limbs in the Orthopedic Literature: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 88 (2006): 41–45.Google ScholarPubMed

Brynner, Rock, and Stephen, Trent, Dark Remedy: The Impact of Thalidomide and Its Revival as a Vital Medicine (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Burnham, John C., “The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1323–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Butler, Samuel, The Way of All Flesh (1903; New York: American Library, 1998).Google Scholar

Campbell, Terence W., and Lorandos, Demosthenes, Cross Examining Experts in the Behavioral Sciences ([Eagan, MN?]: West/Thomson Reuters, September 2012).Google Scholar

Capron, Alexander Morgan, “Daubert and the Quest for Value-Free ‘Scientific Knowledge’ in the Courtroom,” University of Richmond Law Review 30 (1996): 85–108.Google Scholar

Carey, Benedict, “Researcher Pulls His Name from Paper on Prayer and Fertility,” New York Times, December 4, 2006, A15.Google Scholar

Carruth, Russellyn S., and Goldstein, Bernard D., “Relative Risk Greater than Two in Proof of Causation in Toxic Tort Litigation,” Jurimetrics 45 (2001): 195–209.Google Scholar

Carter, K. Codell, “Koch’s Postulates in Relation to the Work of Jakob Henle and Edwin Krebs,” Medical History 29 (1985): 353–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cecil, Joe S., et al., “Assessing Causation in Breast Implant Litigation: The Role of Science Panels,” Law & Contemporary Problems 64 (2001): 139–90.Google Scholar

Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, “The Wedge Strategy,” available at .

Cha, Kwang Y., et al., “Does Prayer Influence the Success of In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer? Report of a Masked, Randomized Trial,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46 (2001): 781–87.Google ScholarPubMed

Chadbourn, James H., ed., Wigmore on Evidence (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1981).

Chan, An Wen, et al., “Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials,” Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (2004): 2457–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chan, Effie J., Note, “The ‘Brave New World’ of Daubert: True Peer Review, Editorial Peer Review, and Scientific Validity,” NYU Law Review 70 (1995): 100–134.Google Scholar

Chang, Kenneth, “Dwarf Planet, Cause of Strife, Gains ‘The Perfect Name,’” New York Times, September 15, 2006, A20.Google Scholar

Cheseboro, Kenneth J., “Galileo’s Retort: Peter Huber’s Junk Scholarship,” American University Law Review 42 (1993): 1637–1726.Google Scholar

Clifford, William Kingdon, “The Ethics of Belief” (1877) in Clifford, , The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, eds. Stephen, Leslie and Pollock, Frederick (London: Watts & Co., 1947), 70–96.Google Scholar

Cohen, L. Jonathan, The Provable and the Probable (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Simon, “What Counts for Identity? The Historical Origins of the Methodology of Latent Fingerprint Identification,” Science in Context 12 (1999): 139–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Simon, “Grandfathering Evidence: Fingerprint Admissibility from Jennings to Llera Plaza and Back Again,” American Criminal Law Review 41 (2004): 1189–1276.Google Scholar

Committee on Model Jury Instructions of the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit, Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions (Criminal Cases) ([Eagan, MN?]: West/Thomson Reuters, 2010.)Google Scholar

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Integrity of the Research Process, National Academy of Sciences, Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992) (2 vols.).Google Scholar

Cooper, William [Hoff, H. S.], The Struggles of Albert Woods (1952: Harmonsdsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books, 1966).Google Scholar

Connors, Edward, Lundgren, Thomas, Miller, Neal, and McEwen, Tom, Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Research Report (June 1996).

Counts, George S., and Lodge, Nucia, The Country of the Blind: The Soviet System of Mind Control (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1949).Google Scholar

Couzin, Jennifer, and Unger, Katherine, “Cleaning Up the Paper Trail,” Science 312 (2006): 38–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, Francis, What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books, 1988).Google Scholar

Dante, , Ed, “The Shadow Scholar: The Man Who Writes Your Student Papers Tells His Story,” Chronicle of Higher Education, November 12, 2010, available at .

Darwin, Charles, Selected Letters on Evolution and Origin of Species: With an Autobiographical Chapter, ed. Darwin, Francis (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1893; reprinted New York: Dover, 1958).Google Scholar

David, Marian Alexander, Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “Truth and Meaning,” Synthese, 17 (1967): 304–23. Reprinted in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “What Metaphors Mean,” Critical Inquiry, 5, no.1 (Autumn 1978): 31–47. Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 2nd ed., 2001).Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs,” in Lepore, Ernest, ed., Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), 433–46.Google Scholar

Davidson, Richard A., “Sources of Funding and Outcomes of Clinical Trials,” Journal of Genera. Internal Medicine 1 (1986): 155–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Percival, and Kenyon, Dean, Of Pandas and People (Dallas, TX: Haughton Publishing Co., 3rd ed., 1993).Google Scholar

Davis, Theodore H., Jr. and Bowman, Catherine B., “No-Fault Compensation for Unavoidable Injuries: Evaluating the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,” University of Dayton Law Review 16, no.2 (2010): 48–54.Google Scholar

Davis, Wendy, “The Immune Response,” ABA (American Bar Association) Journal (October 2010): 48–54.Google ScholarPubMed

“De-Daubertizing Economic Damages Evidence,” LostCompensation.com (January 2006), .

de Finetti, Bruno, “La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives,” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7 (1927): 1–68. In English translation by Henry E. Kyburg, Jr., in Kyburg and Smokler, eds., Studies in Subjective Probability, 93–158.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard, “Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-in-Fact Rules for Indeterminate Plaintiffs,” California Law Review 70 (1982): 881–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLoggio, Loretta, “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Historical Analysis,” New York State Bar Journal (April 1986): 19–25.Google Scholar

de Waal, Cornelis, On Pragmatism (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2005).Google Scholar

Dershowitz, Alan M., “Casey Anthony: The System Worked,” Wall Street Journal, July 7, 2011, A15.Google Scholar

Dervan, Lucian E., and Edkins, Vanessa A., “The Innocent Defendant’s Dilemma: An Innovative Empirical Study of Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 103, no.1 (2013): 1–47.Google Scholar

DES Litigation Report, “Denial of Expert Witness Testimony Violates Daubert, Appeal States” (December 8).

Dewey, John, “The Problem of Truth” (1911), in Hickman, Larry M. and Alexander, Thomas M., eds., The Essential Dewey (Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998), vol. 2, 101–30.Google Scholar

Dewey, John, The Quest for Certainty (New York: Capricorn Books, 1929).Google Scholar

Dewey, John, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (New York: Henry Holt, 1938).Google Scholar

Doll, Richard, “Cancer,” in Witts, Leslie John, ed., Medical Surveys and Clinical Trials: Some Methods and Applications of Group Research in Medicine (London: Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 1964).Google Scholar

Doll, Richard, and Hill, Austin Bradford, “Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung: Preliminary Report,” British Medical Journal 2 (4682) (September 30, 1950): 739–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drazen, Jeffrey M., “COX-2 Inhibitors—A Lesson in Unexpected Problems” New England Journal of Medicine 352 (2005): 1131–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eccles, John C., “The World of Objective Knowledge,” in Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 1, 349–70.

Editorial, “Is Science Really a Pack of Lies?” Nature 303 (1983): 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Editorial, “Islam and Rape,” Wall Street Journal, August 2006, A6.Google Scholar

Editorial, “A Real Vaccine Scare,” Wall Street Journal, October 16–17, 2010, A16.Google Scholar

Egilman, David, Kim, Joyce, and Biklen, Molly, “Proving Causation: The Use and Abuse of Medical and Scientific Information inside the Courtroom—An Epidemiologist’s Critique of the Judicial Interpretation of the Daubert Ruling,” Food and Drug Law Journal 56 (2003): 223–50.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, Laura E., “Court-Appointed Experts in State and Federal Courts: From Hens-Teeth to High Priests,” Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly 71 (October 2000): 172–79.Google Scholar

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (March 2005), available at .

Epstein, Lee, and King, Gary, “Empirical Research and the Goals of Legal Scholarship: The Rules of Inference,” University of Chicago Law Review 69 (2002): 1–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Robert, “Fingerprints Meet Daubert: The Myth of Fingerprint ‘Science’ Is Revealed,” Southern California Law Review 75 (2002): 605–58.Google Scholar

Erichson, Howard M., “Mass Tort Litigation and Inquisitorial Justice,” Georgetown Law Journal 87 (1999): 1983–2004.Google ScholarPubMed

Evans, Alfred S., “Causation and Disease: The Koch-Henle Postulates Revisited,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 49 (1976): 175–95.Google Scholar

Ezzell, Bill, “Laws of Racial Identification and Racial Purity in Nazi Germany and the United States: Did Jim Crow Write the Laws That Spawned the Holocaust?” Southern University Law Review 30 (2002–03): 1–13.Google Scholar

Fabro, Sergio, Smith, Robert L, and William, Richard T., “Toxicity and Teratogenicity of Optical Isomers of Thalidomide,” Nature 215 (July 15, 1967): 296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Faigman, David L., “To Have and Have Not: Assessing the Value of Social Science to Law as Science and Policy,” Emory Law Journal 38 (1989): 1005–95.Google Scholar

Faigman, David L., “The Law’s Scientific Revolution: Reflections and Ruminations on the Law’s Use of Experts in Year Seven of the Revolution,” Washington and Lee Law Review 57 (2000): 661–84.Google Scholar

Fairweather, Abrol, and Zagzebski, Linda, eds., Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Fallon, Eldon E., Grabill, Jeremy T., and Wynne, Robert Pitard, “Bellwether Trials in Multi-District Litigation,” Tulane Law Review 82 (2008): 2323–67.Google Scholar

Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center, 1st ed., 1994).Google Scholar

Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center, 2nd ed., 2000).Google Scholar

Federal Judicial Center, Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth (St. Paul, MN: Thomson West, 2004).Google Scholar

Federal Judicial Center/ National Research Council, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 3rd ed., 2011).Google Scholar

Feinstein, Alvan R., “Scientific Standards in Epidemiologic Studies of the Menace of Everyday Life,” Science 242, no. 4883 (December 2, 1988): 1257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Richard, and Conee, Earl, “Evidentialism,” Philosophical Studies 48 (1985): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fellows, Jeffrey L., et al., “ONJ in Two Dental Practice-Based Research Network Regions,” abstract available at .

Fenner, G. Michael, “The Daubert Handbook: The Case, Its Essential Dilemma, and Its Progeny,” Creighton Law Review 29 (1996): 939–1089.Google Scholar

Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi, La valoración racional de la preuba (Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2007).Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul K., Against Method: Outlines of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (London: New Left Books, 1978).Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Michael O., and Fairley, William B., “A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence,” Harvard Law Review 83, no.3 (1969–70): 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finley, Lucinda M., “Guarding the Gate to the Courthouse: How Trial Judges Are Using Their Evidentiary Screening Role to Remake Tort Causation Rules,” DePaul Law Review 49 (1999–2000): 335–76.Google Scholar

Fisher, George, “Green Felt Jungle: The Story of People v. Collins,” in Lempert, Richard, ed., Evidence Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2006), 7–28.Google Scholar

Flamm, , “Bruce, The Columbia University ‘Miracle’ Study: Flawed and Fraud,” Skeptical Inquirer 28 (September/October 2004): 25–31.Google Scholar

Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases ([Tallahassee, FL?]: The Florida Bar/LexisNexis, 7th ed., 2009).

Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases ([Tallahassee, FL?]: The Florida Bar/LexisNexis, 2nd ed., 2010).

Food and Drug Administration, “FDA approves Diclegis for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting,” FDA News Release (April 8, 2013), available at .

Forbes, “Many Researches Break the Rules: Study,” (April 13, 2006).

Forrest, Barbara, and Gross, Paul R., Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fradella, Henry F., “From Insanity to Beyond: Diminished Capacity, Mental Illness, and Criminal Excuse in the Post-Clark Era,” University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 18, no.1 (2007): 7–91.Google Scholar

Frankel, Marvin F., “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123, no.5 (1975): 1031–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurter, Felix, The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Critical Analysis for Lawyers and Laymen (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1927).Google Scholar

Frápolli, María-José, “The Logical Enquiry into Truth,” History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1996): 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frayn, Michael, Headlong (New York: Picador, 1999).Google Scholar

Freedman, David A., and Stark, Philip B., “The Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Study in Relative Risk and Specific Causation,” Law & Contemporary Problems 64 (2001): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, Neal D., et al., “Cigarette Smoking and Subsequent Risk of Lung Cancer in Men and Women: Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study,” Lancet Oncology 9, no.7 (July 2008): 649–56, available at .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, Lawrence M., A History of American Law (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973).Google Scholar

Friedman, Lee M., “Expert Testimony, Its Abuse and Reformation,” Yale Law Journal 19 (1910): 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Lee S., and Richter, Elihu D., “Relationship between Conflict of Interest and Research Results,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 19, no.1 (January 2004): 51–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, Paul J., “Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1416–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galanter, Marc, “The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1, no.3 (November 2004): 459–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García-Berthou, Emili, and Alcaraz, Carles, “Incongruence between Test Statistics and P Values in Medical Papers,” BMC Medical Research Methodology 4, no.13 (2004): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardner, Martin J. and Bond, Jane, “An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1355–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garner, Bryan A., ed., Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 9th ed., 2009.)

Genetic Home Reference, “Acute promyeloctytic leukemia,” available at .

Genewatch UK, The Police National Database: Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy, available at (January 2005).

Gerontological Society of America, .

Gettier, Edmund, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23 (1963): 121–23. Reprinted in Pojman, ed., Theory of Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Sources, 142–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givens, Richard A. (updated by Shirey, Kevin), Manual of Federal Practice, 2010 Cumulative Supplement (New Providence, NJ: LexisNexus, 2010).Google Scholar

Glaberson, William, “Juries, Their Power under Siege, Find Their Role Is Being Eroded,” New York Times, March 2, 2001, A1.Google Scholar

Godwin, Jean, “Wigmore’s Chart Method,” Informal Logic 20, no.3 (2000): 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golan, Tal, Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Goldberg, Cary, “Judges’ Unanimous Verdict on DNA Lessons: Wow!” New York Times, April 24, 1999, A10.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I., “What Is Justified Belief?” in Pappas, George, ed., Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel, 1979), 1–21.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I., Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I., “Two Concepts of Justification,” in Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives, 2: Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1988), 51–70.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I., Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Bernard D., and Henifin, Mary Sue, “Reference Guide on Toxicology,” Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 1st ed., 181–220.

Goldstein, Bernard D., and Henifin, Mary Sue, “Reference Guide on Toxicology,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Testimony (Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center, 2nd ed., 2000), 401–38.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Rebecca, “The Popperian Soundbite,” in Brockman, John, ed., What Have You Changed Your Mind About? Today’s Leading Minds Rethink Everything (New York: Harper Perennial, 2009), 8–10.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, “The New Riddle of Induction,” in Goodman, , Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (1954; 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), 59–83.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Robert J., “The Hidden Significance of Kumho Tire v. Carmichael: A Compass for Problems of Definition and Procedure Created by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,” Baylor Law Review 52 (2000): 603–46.Google Scholar

Gottesman, Michael H., “From Barefoot to Daubert to Joiner: Triple Play or Double Error?” Arizona Law Review 40 (1998): 753–80.Google Scholar

Gradmann, Christoph, “Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch,” Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, available at (Wiley, 2001).Google Scholar

Graham, Michael, Federal Rules of Evidence in a Nutshell (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 6th ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Graham, Michael, Evidence (St. Paul: Thomson/West, 2nd ed., 2007).Google ScholarPubMed

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor, “Truths and Contradictions about Karl Popper,” Annals of Science 59 (2002): 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gravitz, Lauren, “Biology’s Image Problem,” Rockefeller University Scientist 1 (Spring 2006): 1, 10–12.Google Scholar

Green, Michael D., “Expert Witnesses and Sufficiency of Evidence in Toxic Substances Litigation: The Legacy of Agent Orange and Bendectin Litigation,” Northwestern University Law Review 86, no.3 (1991–92): 643–99.Google Scholar

Green, Michael D., Bendectin and Birth Defects: The Challenges of Mass Toxic Substances Litigation (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Michael D., Freedman, D. Michal, and Gordis, Leon, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 2nd ed., 333–400.

Green, Michael D., Freedman, D. Michal, and Gordis, Leon, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” Federal Judicial Center/National Research Council, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., 549–632.

Greenland, Sander, “Relation of Probability of Causation to Relative Risk and Doubling Dose: A Methodologic Error That Has Become a Social Problem,” American Journal of Public Health 89, n.8 (1998): 1166–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenland, Sander, “The Need for Critical Appraisal of Expert Witnesses in Epidemiology and Statistics,” Wake Forest Law Review 39 (2004): 291–310.Google Scholar

Grisham, John, The King of Torts (New York: Doubleday/Dell, 2003).Google Scholar

Gross, John, ed., The Oxford Book of Aphorisms (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983).

Grover, Dorothy, A Prosententialist Theory of Truth (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Grubin, Don, and Madsen, Lars, “Lie Detection and the Polygraph: A Historical Review,” Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 16 (2005): 357–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, Deviant Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974; 2nd expanded ed., under the title Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Do We Need ‘Fuzzy Logic?’” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 11 (1979): 425–45. Reprinted in Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic, 232–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Is Truth Flat or Bumpy?” in Mellor, D. H., ed., Prospects for Pragmatism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 1–20. Reprinted in Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic, 243–58.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993); expanded 2nd ed., Evidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2009).Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Knowledge and Propaganda: Reflections of an Old Feminist,” Partisan Review LX, no.4 (1993): 556–64. Reprinted in Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 123–36.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Multiculturalism and Objectivity,” Partisan Review LXII, no. 3 (1995): 397–405. Reprinted in Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 137–48.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Preposterism and Its Consequences,” Social Philosophy and Policy 13, no.2 (1996): 296–315, and in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred B., and Paul, Jeffrey, eds., Scientific Innovation, Philosophy and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 296–315. Reprinted in Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Reply to BonJour,” Synthese 112, no.1 (1997): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification,” in Pojman, ed., The Theory of Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Sources, 2nd ed., 1998, 283–93.

Haack, Susan, “Confessions of an Old-Fashioned Prig,” in Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 7–30.

Haack, Susan, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Staying for an Answer: The Untidy Process of Groping for Truth,” Times Literary Supplement (July 9, 1999):12–14. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 35–46.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Same, Only Different,” Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36, no.3 (2002): 34–39. Reprinted in Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2002, no.1 (2002): 18–22, and in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Realisms and Their Rivals: Recovering Our Innocence,” Facta Philosophica 4, no.1 (2002): 67–88.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Coherence, Consistency, Cogency, Congruity, Cohesiveness, &c.: Remain Calm! Don’t Go Overboard!” New Literary History 35, no.2 (2004): 167–3. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “An Epistemologist among the Epidemiologists,” Epidemiology 15, no.5 (September 2004): 51–52. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 195–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haack, Susan, “Fallibilism and Faith, Naturalism and the Supernatural, Science and Religion,” in Moriggi, Stefano and Sindoni, Elio, eds., Dio, la natura e la legge (Milan: Angelico/Mundo X, 2005), 143–54. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 199–208.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Formal Philosophy: A Plea for Pluralism,” in Symons, John and Hendricks, Vincent, eds., Formal Philosophy (New York: Automatic Press/V.I. P., 2005), 77–98. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 235–50.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does ‘The Path of the Law’ Lead Us?” American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (2005): 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Ideal of Intellectual Integrity, in Life and Literature,” New Literary History 36, no.3 (2005): 359–73. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Unity of Truth and the Plurality of Truths,” Principia 9, no.21 (2005): 87–100. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 53–68.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does ‘The Path of the Law’ Lead Us?” American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (2005): 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Introduction: Pragmatism, Old and New,” in Haack, Susan and Lane, Robert E., eds., Pragmatism, Old and New: Selected Writings (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2006), 15–68.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Integrity of Science: What It Means, Why It Matters,” in Etica e Investigação nas Ciências da Vida—Actas do 10 o Seminàrio do CNECV (2006): 9–28. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 121–40.

Haack, Susan, “On Logic in the Law: ‘Something, but Not All,’” Ratio Juris 20, no.1 (2007): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2008; 2nd, expanded ed., 2013). [Page references are to the 2nd ed., 2013.]Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Of Truth, in Science and in Law,” Brooklyn Law Review 73, no.3 (2008): 895–1008.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Pluralistic Universe of Law: Towards a Neo-Classical Legal Pragmatism,” Ratio Juris 21, no.4 (2008): 453–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXXIII (2008): 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “’Know’ Is Just a Four-Letter Word,” in Haack, Evidence and Inquiry, 2nd ed., 301–31.

Haack, Susan, “The Growth of Meaning and the Limits of Formalism, in Science and Law,” Análisis Filosófico XXIX, no.1 (2009): 5–29.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Six Signs of Scientism” (first published, in Chinese and in Spanish, in 2010), Logos & Episteme III, no.1 (2012): 75–95. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Cracks in the Wall, A Bulge under the Carpet: The Singular Story of Religion, Evolution, and the US Constitution,” Wayne Law Review 57, no.4 (2011):1303–32.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Erkendelsesteori: hvem har brug for det?” (“Epistemology: Who Needs It?”), Kritik 200 (2011): 26–35. Also appeared, in Italian translation by Carlo Penco, under the title “Epistemologia: Chi Ne Ha Bisogno?” Epistemologia XXXIV (2011): 268–88. [English version available from the author.]Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Six Signs of Scientism,” Logos & Episteme 3, no.1 (2012):75–95. Reprinted in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Técnicas forenses, ciencia impulsada por litígios y el problema de los incentivos perversos: Lecciones a partir de la saga Ramirez,” in Rúa, Monica María Bustamente, ed., Derecho probatorio contemporáneo: Prueba cientifica y técnicas forenses (Medellín, Colombia: Universidad de Medellín, 2012), 333–40. [English version available from the author.]Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “Out of Step: Academic Ethics in a Preposterous Environment,” in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 251–68.

Haack, Susan, “Just Say ‘No’ to Logical Negativism,” in Haack, Putting Philosophy to Work, 179–94.

Haack, Susan, “Die Welt des Unschuldigen Realismus,” in Gabriel, Markus, ed., Der Neue Realismus (Berlin: Suhrkamp, forthcoming).

Hacking, Ian M., The Emergence of Probability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hailey, Arthur, Strong Medicine (London: Pan Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Haller, Christine, and Benowitz, Neal L., “Adverse Cardiovascular and Central Nervous System Events Associated with Dietary Supplements Containing Ephedra Alkaloids,” New England Journal of Medicine 343 (2000): 1833–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hand, Learned, “Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony,” Harvard Law Review 15 (1901): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanlon, Michael, “Is This Proof of Life on Mars? The Meteorite That May Finally Have Resolved the Great Mystery,” Daily Mail (London, UK), February 10, 2006, 40.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology, trans. Cook, J. A. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar

Hazard, Geoffrey C., Jr., Gedid, John L., and Sowle, Stefan, “An Historical Analysis of the Binding Effect of Class Suits,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146 (1998): 1849–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Frage nach dem Ding (1935–36), in Heidegger, Gesamtausabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1984), vol. 41, ed. Petra Jaeger, 1–254.Google Scholar

Heilbrun, Robert, Offer of Proof (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 2003).Google Scholar

Heinzerling, Lisa, “Doubting Daubert,” Journal of Law & Policy 14 (2006): 65–83.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” Mind 54 (1945): 1–26, 97–121. Reprinted in Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., “Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance: Problems and Changes” (adapted from “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11 [January 1950]: 41–63, and “The Concept of Cognitive Significance,” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 80, no.1 [1951]: 61–77), in Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 99–119.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., “Postscript (1964) on Cognitive Significance,” in Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 120–22.

Hempel, Carl G., Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966).Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., “The Irrelevance of the Concept of Truth for the Critical Appraisal of Scientific Theories” (originally published under the title “Il significato del concetto de verità per la valuazione critica delle teorie scientifiche,” Nuova Civilità delle Macchine VIII, no.4 [32] [1990]: 7–12); in Shea, William R. and Spadafora, Antonio, eds., Interpreting the World (Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1992), 121–29. Reprinted in Jeffrey, Richard, ed., Selected Philosophical Essays [by] Carl G. Hempel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 75–84.Google Scholar

Henneckens, Charles H., et al., “Self-Reported Breast Implants and Connective Tissue Diseases in Female Health Professionals: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Journal of the American Medical Association 275, no.8 (1996): 616–21.Google Scholar

Hershey, A. D., and Chase, Martha, “Independent Functions of Viral Protein and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage,” Journal of General Physiology 36 (1952): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, Austin Bradford, Principles of Medical Statistics (London: Lancet, Ltd., 1937; 9th ed., 1971).Google Scholar

Hill, Austin Bradford, “The Statistician in Medicine” (Alfred Watson Memorial Lecture), Journal of the Society of Actuaries 88, no.II (1962): 178–91.Google Scholar

Hill, Austin Bradford, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58 (1965): 295–300.Google ScholarPubMed

Hill, Austin Bradford, and Hill, I. D., Bradford Hill’s Principles of Medical Statistics (London: Edward Arnold, 1991).Google Scholar

Hill, Kevin P., et al., “The ADVANTAGE Seeding Trial: A Review of Internal Documents,” Annals of Internal Medicine 149, no.4 (August 19, 2008): 251–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Himes, Charles F., “The Scientific Expert in Forensic Procedure,” 135 Journal of the Franklin Institute 135, no.6 (1893): 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinkle, Robert L., Chair, Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, memorandum to Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chair, Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (May 6, 2009), United States Courts, available at .

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Review of Langdell, A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2nd ed. (1880; in Novick, ed., Collected Works of Justice Wendell Holmes, vol. 3, 102–04).

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, The Common Law (1881), in Novick, ed., The Collected Works of Justice Holmes, vol. 3, 109–324.

Holmes, Oliver Wendell “Speech at a Dinner Given to Chief Justice Holmes by the Bar Association of Boston” (1900), in Novick, ed., The Collected Works of Justice Holmes, vol. 3, 498–500.

Horrobin, David F., “The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1438–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horton, Richard, “Expression of Concern: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Oral Cancer,” Lancet 367 (2006): 196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horton, Richard, “Retraction – Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study,” The Lancet 367 (2006): 382.Google ScholarPubMed

Horwich, Paul, Truth (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul, From a Deflationary Point of View (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Howell, Thomas J., ed., Cobbett’s Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and Misdemeanors from the Earliest Period to the Present Time (London: R. Bagshaw, 1810), 34 vols.

Huber, Peter, “Junk Science in the Courtroom,” Valparaiso Law Review 26 (1992): 723–55.Google Scholar

Huber, Peter, Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (New York: Basic Books, 1993).Google Scholar

Humes, Edward, Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America’s Soul (New York: Ecco, 2007).Google Scholar

Humphrey, George F., “Scientific Fraud: The McBride Case,” Medicine, Science, and the Law 32 (1992): 199–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Humphrey, George F., “Scientific Fraud: The McBride Case – Judgment,” Science Law 34 (1994): 299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Husni, Ronak, and Newman, Daniel L., Muslim Women in Law and Society (New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

“If It Walks Like a Fish …,” Newsweek, April 27, 2007, 8.

Interlandi, Janeen, “An Unwelcome Discovery,” New York Times, October 22, 2006 § 6 (Magazine), 98.Google ScholarPubMed

International Agency for Research on Cancer, “Some Thyrotropic Agents,” IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (Lyon, France: World Health Organization, vol. 79, 2001), 145–59, available at .Google Scholar

International Agency for Research on Cancer, “Preamble” to “A Review of Human Carcinogens,” IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (Lyon, France: World Health Organization, vol. 100, 2008).Google Scholar

International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators, “Women’s Susceptibility to Tobacco Carcinogens and Survival after Diagnosis of Lung Cancer,” Journal of the American Medical Association 296, no.2 (2006): 180–84.

International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, .

Ionnadis, John P. A., “Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research,” Journal of the American Medical Association 294 (2005): 218–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, Takumi, Ando, Hideki, and Handa, Horoshi, “Teratogenic Effects of Thalidomide: Molecular Mechanisms,” Cell and Molecular Life Sciences, available at (2011).

Jaffe, Louis L., “Res Ipsa Loquitur Vindicated,” Buffalo Law Review 1, no.1 (1951): 1–15.Google Scholar

Jaffee, Leonard R., “Of Probativity and Probability: Statistics, Scientific Evidence, and the Calculus of Chances at Trial,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46 (1984–85): 925–1083.Google Scholar

James, Fleming, Jr., “Contributory Negligence,” Yale Law Journal 62, no.1 (1953): 691–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, William, “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life” (1891), in James, , The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, eds. Burkhardt, Frederick and Bowers, Fredson (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979), 141–72.Google Scholar

James, William, “Philosophical Conceptions and Practical Results,” University Chronicle (University of California, Berkeley) 1 (September 1898): 287–10; reprinted in James, Pragmatism, 255–70.Google Scholar

James, William, Pragmatism (1907), eds. Burkhardt, Frederick and Bowers, Fredson (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

James, William, The Meaning of Truth (1909), eds. Burkhardt, Frederick and Bowers, Fredson (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Jamieson, Allan, and Bader, Scott, “Got a Match, Guv?” available at (2011).

Janin, Hunt and Kahlmeyer, André, Islamic Law: The Sharia from Muhammad’s Time to the Present (Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, 2007).Google Scholar

Johnson, Phillip E., Darwin on Trial (Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway, 1991; 2nd ed., Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Judicial Committee on Model Jury Instructions for the Eighth Circuit, Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit ([Eagan, MN?]: West/Thomson Reuters, 2011).Google Scholar

Judson, Horace Freeland, The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979).Google Scholar

Judson, Horace Freeland, “Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review,” Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994): 92–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jurs, Andrew, “Judicial Analysis of Complex and Cutting-Edge Science in the Daubert Era: Epidemiological Risk Assessment as a Test Case for Reform Strategies,” Connecticut Law Review 42, no.1 (2009): 49–100.Google Scholar

Jurs, Andrew, “Balancing Legal Process with Scientific Expertise: Expert Witness Methodology in Five Nations and Suggestions for Reform of Post-Daubert U.S. Reliability Determinations,” Marquette Law Review 95, no.4 (2012): 1329–1415.Google Scholar

Kabat, Geoffrey C., Miller, Anthony B., and Rohan, Thomas E., “Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Risk of Lung Cancer in Women: A Prospective Cohort Study,” International Journal of Cancer 120, no. 10 (2007): 2214–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kadane, Jay, and Schum, David, A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996).Google Scholar

Kadri, Sadakat, The Trial: A History, From Socrates to O. J. Simpson (New York: Random House, 2005).Google Scholar

Kakaes, Konstantin, review of Roger Weins, “‘Red Rover’: Inside the Story of Robotic Space Exploration, from Genesis to the Mars Rover Curiosity,” Washington Post, May 10, 2013, available at .

Kaplan, John, “Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process,” Stanford Law Review 20 (1968): 1065–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, David H., “Do We Need a Calculus of Weight to Understand Proof beyond a Reasonable Doubt?” in Tillers and Green, eds., Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence, 129–45.

Kaye, David H., and Freedman, David A., “Reference Guide on Statistics,” Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011), 211–302.Google Scholar

Keeton, W. Page et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1984).Google Scholar

Keiter, Mitchell, “Just Say No Excuse: The Rise and Fall of the Intoxication Defense,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87, no.2 (1997): 482–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kevles, Bettyann Holtzmann, Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard, A Treatise on Probability (London: MacMillan and Co., Ltd., 1921).Google Scholar

Khanna, Roma, and McVicker, Steve, “Police Chief Shakes Up Crime Lab; 2 Officials Quit, Others Disciplined,” Houston Chronicle, June 13, 2003, A1.Google Scholar

Khanna, Roma, and McVicker, Steve, “HPD Ignored Warnings, Ex-Lab Man Says: Retired Official Says He Cited ‘Train Wreck,’” Houston Chronicle, June 23, 2003, A1.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, Søren, Journals (1846), in Dru, Alexander, ed., A Selection from the Journals of Søren Kierkegaard (New York: Oxford University Press, 1938).Google Scholar

Klein, Marc S., “Expert Testimony in Pharmaceutical Product Liability Actions,” Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law Journal 45, no.4 (1990): 393–442.Google Scholar

Knightley, Phillip, Evans, Harold, Potter, Elaine, and Wallace, Marjorie, Suffer the Children: The Story of Thalidomide (New York: Viking, 1979).Google Scholar

Koertge, Noretta, “Popper and the Science Wars” (lecture for the Summer School on Theory of Knowledge, Madralin, Warsaw, August 16–31, 1997), available at .

Kozinski, Alex, “Brave New World,” University of California Davis Law Review 10 (1996–97): 997–1101.Google Scholar

Krause, Daniel A., McCabe, John G., and Lieberman, Joel D., “Dangerously Misunderstood: Representative Jurors’ Reaction to Expert Testimony on Future Dangerousness in a Sexually Violent Predator Trial,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 198, no.1 (2012): 18–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuzer, Michaela, et al., “Hormonal Factors and Risk of Lung Cancer in Women?” International Journal of Epidemiology 32, no.1 (2003): 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krimsky, Sheldon, Science in the Private Interest (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003).Google Scholar

Kronick, David A. “Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1321–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Kyburg, Henry E., Jr., and Smokler, Howard E., eds., Studies in Subjective Probability (New York: Wiley, 1964).Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre, “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George, “A Cognitive Scientist Looks at Daubert,” American Journal of Public Health 95 (2005): S114–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landsman, Stephan, “Of Witches, Madmen, and Product Liability: An Historical Survey of the Use of Expert Testimony,” Behavioral Science and Law 13, no.2 (1995): 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langdell, Christopher Columbus, A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, with a Summary of the Topics Covered by the Cases (Boston: Little, Brown, 2nd ed., 1879).Google Scholar

Larson, Edward J., Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law Commission Report No.325, “Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales” (March 21, 2011) (London: The Stationery Office, 2011); also available at .

Laudan, Larry, “Science at the Bar—Causes for Concern,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 7, no.41 (1982): 16–19. Reprinted in Ruse, ed., But Is It Science? 351–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry, “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem,” in Cohen, Robert S. and Laudan, Larry, eds., Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis (Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983), 111–27. Reprinted in Ruse, ed., But Is It Science? 337––50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, David, “Introduction,” in David Lazer, ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice, 3–12.

Lazer, David, ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004).

Legal Information Bulletin, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, Inc. (09–152), available at .

Lempert, Richard, “The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof,” in Tillers and Green, ed., Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence, 61–102.

Letzing, John, “A California City Is Tweeting—Chirping, Actually—in a Big Way,” Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2012, A1, A12.Google Scholar

Lévesque, Linda, Brophy, James M., and Zhang, Bin, “Time Variations in the Risk of Myocardial Infarction among Elderly Users of Cox-2 Inhibitors,” published electronically at (May 2, 2006) and, abridged, in Canadian Medical Association Journal 174, no.11 (May 23, 2006): 1563–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levi, Edward, Introduction to Legal Reasoning (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Levin, Morton L., Hyman Goldstein, and Paul R. Gerhardt, “Cancer and Tobacco Smoking: A Preliminary Report”, Journal of the American Medical Association 143, no.4 (1950): 336–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Sinclair, Arrowsmith (1925; New York: Signet Classics, 1998).Google Scholar

Lock, Stephen, A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1985).Google Scholar

Lock, Stephen, and Smith, Jane, “What Do Peer Reviewers Do?” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1341–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, John, The Conduct of the Understanding, in Posthumous Works of Mr. John Locke (London: A. and J. Churchill, 1706), 1–137.Google Scholar

Long, Ray, and Garcia, Monique, “Quinn Expected to Sign Death Penalty Ban,” Chicago Tribune (March 8, 2011), available at .

Louisell, David W., and Mueller, Christopher B., Federal Evidence (Rochester, NY: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co., 1977–81) (5 vols.).Google Scholar

Lustre, Alice B., Annotation, “Post-Daubert Standards for Admissibility of Scientific and Other Expert Evidence in State Courts,” ALR (American Law Reports) 5th, 90 (2001) 453–545.Google Scholar

Lysaght, Pamela, Michigan Legal Research (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Mach, Ernst, “On the Principle of Conservation of Energy” and, especially, “On the Principle of Comparison in Physics,” in Populärwissenschaftlich Vorlesungen (Leipzig, 1894), trans. McCormack, Thomas J., Popular Scientific Lectures (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1943), 137–85 and 236–58.Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic William, The Forms of Action at Common Law, eds. Chaytor, A. H. and Whittaker, W. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909).Google Scholar

Maloney, Frank, “Gregor Johann Mendel O.S.A.,” available at .

Mangum, Charles S., The Legal Status of the Negro (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1940).Google Scholar

March, Astara, “Drug Revived to Fight Morning Sickness,” Nurse Week (October 11, 2000), available at .Google Scholar

Marcin, Raymond B., “Searching for the Origin of Class Action,” Catholic University Law Review 23, no.3 (1974): 515–24.Google Scholar

Marquéz-Garbán, Diana C., et al., “Estrogen Receptor Signaling Pathways in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer,” Steroids 72, no.2 (February 2007): 135–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Martini, Steve, Undue Influence (New York: G. P. Putnam, 1994).Google Scholar

Martini, Steve, The Rule of Nine (New York: Harper, 2010).Google Scholar

Martinson, Brian C., et al., “Scientists Behaving Badly,” Nature 435 (2005): 737–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maugh, Thomas H., III, “Probe Enters Mars Orbit,” Los Angeles Times, March 11, 2006, A12.Google Scholar

Maxwell, Simon R. J., and Webb, David J., “Cox-2 Selective Inhibitors – Important Lessons Learned,” Lancet 365 (2005): 449–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MayoClinic.com, “Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),” available at .

McCormick, Charles T., Handbook of the Law of Evidence (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1954).Google Scholar

McCutchen, Charles W., “Peer Review: Treacherous Servant, Disastrous Master,” Technology Review 94 (1991): 28–51.Google Scholar

McGarity, Thomas O., “Our Science Is Sound Science and Their Science Is Junk Science: Science-Based Strategies for Avoiding Accountability and Responsibility for Risk-Producing Products and Activities,” Kansas Law Review 52, no.4 (2004): 897–937.Google Scholar

McGettigan, Patricia, and Henry, David, “Cardiovascular Risk and Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase: A Systematic Review of the Observational Studies of Selective and Non-Selective Inhibitors on Cyclooxygenase,” Journal of the American Medical Association 296, no.2 (October 4, 2006), 1633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McQuiston, John T., “Prosecutor Says DNA Evidence May Free Man,” New York Times, December 1, 1992, B7.Google Scholar

McQuiston, John T., “Man Freed after a DNA Test Is Sentenced in a Second Rape,” New York Times, October 24, 1997, B4.Google Scholar

McVicker, Steve, and Khanna, Roma, “3 Say Chief Knew of Lab Woes; Bradford Says Some Disgruntled Employees Trying to Discredit Him,” Houston Chronicle, June 22, 2003, A1.Google Scholar

McVicker, Steve, and Khanna, Roma, “93 HPD Lab Cases under Scrutiny: Investigator’s New Report Raises Figure from 27,” Houston Chronicle, May 11, 2006, B1.Google Scholar

Medawar, Peter, “Science and Literature,” Encounter XXXII, no.1 (1969): 15–23.Google Scholar

Medical News Today, “New England Journal of Medicine Damaged by Its Conduct over Vioxx, Says Former Editor of British Medical Journal,” available at (July 9, 2006).

MedicineNet.com, “Definition of Acute Promyeloctytic Leukemia,” available at .

Mellor, D. H., “The Popper Phenomenon,” Philosophy 52 (1977): 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, Louis-Sébastien, Tableau de Paris (revised ed., Amsterdam, the Netherlands: 1782–88) (12 vols.).Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster, , Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Publishing, 1991).Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online, .

Merton, Robert, “Science and Democratic Social Structure,” in Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (Chicago: Free Press of Glencoe, 1949), 307–16.Google Scholar

Michaels, David, and Monforton, Celeste, “Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment,” American Journal of Public Health 95 (2005): S39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mill, John Stuart, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (1843; 8th ed., London: Longman, Green, 1970).Google Scholar

Millay, Edna St. Vincent, “Justice Denied in Massachusetts,” in The Buck in the Snow and Other Poems (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1928), 32–33.Google Scholar

Miller, Richard Lawrence, Nazi Justiz: Law of the Holocaust (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1995).Google Scholar

Mills, Clarence A., and Porter, Marjorie Mills, “Tobacco Smoking Habits and Cancer of the Mouth and Respiratory System,” Cancer Research 10, no.9 (1950): 539–42.Google ScholarPubMed

Mills, Steve, “What Killed Illinois’ Death Penalty?” Chicago Tribune, March 10, 2011, available at .

Mnookin, Jennifer, “Fingerprints: Not a Gold Standard,” Issues in Science and Technology 20 (fall 2003): 47–54.Google Scholar

Molière, , Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme (1670). [“Molière” was the stage name of actor Jean-Baptiste Poquelin.]

Mossman, Brooke T., Klein, George, and Hausen, Harald zur, “Modern Criteria to Determine the Etiology of Human Carcinogens,” Seminars in Cancer Biology 14 (2004): 449–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nance, Dale, “Two Concepts of Reliability,” American Philosophical Association, Newsletter on Philosophy and Law (Fall 2003): 123–27.Google Scholar

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, “Guillain-Barré Syndrome Fact Sheet,” available at .

National Institutes of Health, “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder,” available at .

National Science Panel, Silicone Breast Implants in Relation to Connective Tissue Diseases and Immunologic Dysfunction (November 30, 1998), available at .

Neilson, George, Trial by Combat (London: Williams and Norgate, 1890).Google Scholar

Nesson, Charles, “The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts,” Harvard Law Review 98, no.7 (1984–5): 1357–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesson, Charles, “Peremptory Challenges: Technology Should Kill Them?” Law, Probability and Risk 3 (2003): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neville, Julie A., et al., “Errors in the Archives of Dermatology and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology from January through December 2003,” Archives of Dermatology 142 (2006): 737–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neufeld, Peter J., “The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform,” American Journal of Public Health 95 (2005): S107–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newman, Stuart A., “Dr. Brent and Scientific Debate,” Reproductive Toxicology 13, no.4 (1999): 241–44.Google ScholarPubMed

Newman, Stuart A., “A Response to Dr. Brent’s Commentary on ‘Dr. Brent and Scientific Debate,’” Reproductive Toxicology 13, no.4 (1999): 255–60.Google Scholar

Novick, Sheldon M., ed., Collected Works of Justice Holmes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995) (3 vols.).

O’Keefe, Patricia, and Patel, Jyoti, “Women and Lung Cancer,” Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 24, no.1 (February 2008): 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oldenburg, Henry, Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, translated and edited by Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966) (3 vols.).Google Scholar

Olding, Alan, “Popper for Afters,” Quadrant 143, no.12 (December 1999): 19–22.Google Scholar

Oliver, Lisi, The Beginnings of English Law (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Malley, Kevin F., et al., eds., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions: Civil (Eagan, MN: West Group, 5th ed., 2000, and Supplement 2010).Google Scholar

O’Malley, Kevin F., et al., eds., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions: Criminal (6th ed., Eagan, MN: Thomson/West, 2008, and Supplement 2010).Google Scholar

Ordronaux, John, “On Expert Testimony in Judicial Proceedings,” Journal of Insanity 30, no.3 (1874): 312–22.Google Scholar

Osmond, Daniel H., “Malice’s Wonderland: Research Funding and Peer Review,” Journal of Neurobiology 14, no.2 (1983): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) Foundation, “What Is Osteonecrosis of the Jaw?” available at .

Overbye, Dennis, “Astronomers in Quandary over Pluto’s Planet Status,” New York Times, August 23, 2006, A20.Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary Online, .

Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Integrity of the Research Process, National Academy of Sciences, Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992), vol. I.Google Scholar

Papineau, David, “The Proof is in the Disproof,” review of Malachi Haim Hacohen, Karl Popper: The Formative Years, New York Times Book Review, November 12, 2000, available at .

Pardo, Michael, “Estándares de prueba y teoría de la prueba,” in Vázquez, Carmen, ed., Estándares de prueba y preuba científica: Ensayos de epistemología juridical (Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2013), 99–118.Google Scholar

Park, Roger, and Saks, Michael, “Evidence Scholarship Reconsidered: Results of the Interdisciplinary Turn,” Boston College Law Review 47 (2005–06): 949–1031.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers, eds. Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and (vols. 7 and 8) Arthur Burks (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58). References are by volume and paragraph number.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders, Writings: A Chronological Edition, eds. Peirce Edition Project (Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982–). References are by volume and page number.Google Scholar

Perlin, Michael L., The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Peterson, Joseph L., and Leggett, Anna S., “The Evolution of Forensic Science: Progress Amid the Pitfalls,” Stetson Law Review 36, no.3 (Spring 2007): 621–60.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, Mark P., and Snodgrass, Gwendolyn L., “The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1420–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Carl V. and Goodman, Karen J., “The Missed Lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill,” Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 1, no.3 (October 4, 2004), available at .Google ScholarPubMed

Planetsave, “Mars Rover Curiosity—NASA’s Rover Gearing Up For Second Ever Rock Drilling And Sampling On Mars,” May 12, 2013, available at .

Plato, , Republic, trans. Grube, G. A., revised by Reeve, C. D. C. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992).Google Scholar

Poehlman, Eric T., et al., “Changes in Energy Balance and Body Composition at Menopause: A Controlled Longitudinal Study,” Annals of Internal Medicine 123 (1995): 673–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

“Pointer Rules Federal Science Panel Not Tainted by Payments to Panelist,” Medical-Legal Aspects of Breast Implants 7, no.5 (April 1999): 1, 4, 5.

Pojman, Louis J., ed., Theory of Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Sources (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2nd ed., 1998).

Polanyi, Michael, Science, Faith, and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1946).Google Scholar

Pollack, Wendy, “Legal Demands Take Time from Scientists’ Real Work,” Wall Street Journal, January 27, 2007, A5.Google Scholar

Pons’ Globalwörterbuch Deutsch-Englisch (Stuttgart: Klett, and London: Collins, 1983).

Pope, Tara Parker, “New Study Reassures Most Users of Hormones,” Wall Street Journal, April 4, 2007, A1, A12.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (first published in German in 1934; English edition, London: Hutchinson, 1959).Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945; revised ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report,” in Mace, C. A., ed., British Philosophy in Mid-Century (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1957), 155–91 (not included in the second edition, 1966). Reprinted under the title, “Science: Conjectures and Refutations” in Karl R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, 33–65.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge” (1963), in Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, 215–50.

Popper, Karl R., “Addenda: Some Technical Notes,” in Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, 377–413.

Popper, Karl R., Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “On the Theory of the Objective Mind” (1968), in Popper, Objective Knowledge, 153–90.

Popper, Karl R., “Two Faces of Common Sense: An Argument for Commonsense Realism and against the Commonsense Theory of Knowledge” (from a talk given in 1970), in Popper, Objective Knowledge, 32–105.

Popper, Karl R., “Toleration and Intellectual Responsibility” (lecture delivered at the University of Tübingen, 1981), in Popper, In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, trans. Bennett, Laura J. (London: Routledge, 1992), 188–203.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Conjectural Knowledge: My Solution of the Problem of Induction,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 25 e année, no. 95–6, fasc. 1–2 (1971): 167–97. Reprinted in Popper, Objective Knowledge, 1–33.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Comments on Tarski’s Theory of Truth,” in Popper, Objective Knowledge, 319–40.

Popper, Karl R., Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Ayer on Empiricism and against Verisimilitude,” in Schilpp, , ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 2, 1100–14.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., “Natural Selection and Its Scientific Status” (1977), in Miller, David, ed., The Pocket Popper (London: Fontana, 1983), 239–46.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R., Unended Quest (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1979) (first published in Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 1, 3–181).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard, Frontiers in Legal Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., “Against the Law Reviews,” Legal Affairs (November/December 2004): 57–58.

Psychology Today, “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder,” available at .

Quayle, Dan, “Agenda for Civil Justice Reform in America,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 60 (1992): 997–1007.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., Quiddities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., Pursuit of Truth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “Reactions,” in Leonardo, Paulo and Santambrogio, Marco, eds., On Quine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 347–61.Google Scholar

Quinton, A. M., “The Foundations of Knowledge,” in Williams, Bernard and Montefiore, Alan, eds., British Analytical Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966), 55–86.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, “Facts and Propositions” (1927), in Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, ed. Braithwaite, Richard B. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1931), 138–55.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, On Truth: Original Manuscripts (1927–29) from the Ramsey Collection at the University of Pittsburgh, eds. Rescher, Nicholas and Majer, Ulrich (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Wayne A., et al., “COX-2 Selective Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Serious Coronary Heart Disease,” Lancet 360 (October 5, 2002): 1071–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Read, C. Stanford, letter to Smith Ely Jelliffe (February 3, 1921), in Papers of Smith Ely Jellife, 1866–1940 (on file with Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 16).Google Scholar

Regnier, Thomas, “Barefoot in Quicksand: The Future of ‘Future Dangerousness’ Predictions in Death Penalty Sentencing in the World of Daubert and Kumho,” University of Akron Law Review 37, no.3 (2004): 467–507.Google Scholar

Relman, Arthur, “Moscow in January,” New England Journal of Medicine 302 (1980): 523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rennie, Drummond, “Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review,” Journal of the American Medical Association 256 (1986): 2391–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rennie, Drummond, “Editorial Peer Review: Its Development and Rationale,” in Peer Review in Health Sciences, eds. Godlee, Fiona and Jefferson, Tom (London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2nd ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Reno, Janet, “Message from the Attorney General,” in Connors, Lundgren, Miller, and McEwen, Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science, iii–iv.

Rescher, Nicholas, The Coherence Theory of Truth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas, and Majer, Ulrich, “Editors’ Introduction” to Ramsey, On Truth.

Resnick, Judith, “From ‘Cases’ to ‘Litigation,’” Law & Contemporary Problems 5 (1991): 6–68.Google Scholar

Risinger, D. Michael, Denbeaux, Mark P., and Saks, Michael J., “Brave New ‘Post-Daubert World’—A Reply to Professor Moenssens,” Seton Hall Law Review 29 (1998): 405–90.Google Scholar

Risinger, D. Michael, et al., “Bayes Wars Redivivus—An Exchange,” International Commentary on Evidence 8, no.1, ISSN (Online) 1554–4567, DOI: 10.2202/1554–4567.1115 (November 2010).Google Scholar

Rochon, Paula, et al., “A Study of Manufacturer-Supported Trials of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Treatment of Arthritis,” Archives of Internal Medicine 154, no.2 (January 24, 1994): 157–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rodricks, Joseph V., and Reith, Susan H., “Toxicological Assessment in the Courtroom: Are Available Methodologies Suitable for Evaluating Toxic Tort and Product Liability Claims?” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 27 (1998): 21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rogers, Adam, “Come In, Mars,” Newsweek, 19 August, 1996, 56–57.Google Scholar

Roll-Hansen, Nils, The Lysenko Effect: The Politics of Science (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2005).Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard, Objectivity, Relativism and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard, “Trotsky and the Wild Orchids,” Common Knowledge 1, no.3 (1992): 140–53.Google Scholar

Rothman, Kenneth, Modern Epidemiology (Boston: Little, Brown, 1986).Google Scholar

Rubin, Carl R., and Ringenbach, Laura, “The Use of Court Experts in Asbestos Litigation,” Federal Rules Decisions 137 (1999): 35–52.Google Scholar

Rumsfeld, Donald H., US Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, News Briefing (Febrary 12, 2002), transcript available at .

Ruse, Michael, Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Creation/Evolution Controversies (London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1982).Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael, “Expert Witness Testimony Sheet,” McLean v. Arkansas (1982), in Ruse, ed., But Is It Science? 287–306.

Ruse, Michael, “A Philosopher’s Day in Court,” in Ruse, ed., But Is It Science? 13–35.

Ruse, Michael, ed., But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books), 1996.

Russell, Bertrand, “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism” (1918), in Russell, Logic and Knowledge, 177–281.

Russell, Bertrand, “On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean” (1919), in Logic and Knowledge, 283–320.

Russell, Bertrand, Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1948).Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, ed. Marsh, Robert C. (New York: Capricorn Books, 1956).Google Scholar

RXList.com, Clinical Pharmacology, available at .

Sand, George, letter to Armand Barbes, 1867, in Gross, ed., The Oxford Book of Aphorisms, 228.

Sanders, Joseph, “From Science to Evidence: The Testimony on Causation in the Bendectin Cases,” Stanford Law Review 46, no.1 (1993): 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sanders, Joseph, Bendectin on Trial: A Study of Mass Tort Litigation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, Joseph, “Science, Law, and the Expert Witness,” Law & Contemporary Problems 72, no. 1 (2009): 63–90.Google Scholar

Sanders, Joseph, and Green, Michael D., “Admissibility versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” forthcoming in Diego Papayannis, ed., Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Santayana, George, The Life of Reason (1910; 2nd ed., New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1922) (5 vols.).Google Scholar

Savage, Leonard J., The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley, 1954).Google Scholar

Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott, “The Making of Truth,” in Schiller, Studies in Humanism (New York: MacMillan, 1907), 179–203.Google Scholar

Schilpp, Paul A., ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1974) (2 vols.).

Schmeck, Harold M. Jr., “Swine Flu Program Brings $10.7 Million in Claims,” New York Times Global Edition, February 5, 1977, 8.

Schonberger, Lawrence B., et al., “Guillain-Barre [sic] Syndrome Following Vaccination in the National Influenza Vaccination Program, United States 1976–1977,” American Journal of Epidemiology 110, no.2 (1979): 105–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schreck, Robert, Baker, Lyle A., Ballard, George P., and Dolgoff, Sidney, “Tobacco Smoking as an Etiologic Factor in Disease. Part I: Cancer,” Cancer Research 10, no.1 (1950): 49–58.Google Scholar

Schrager, Sarina and Potter, Beth E., “Diethylstilbestrol Exposure,” American Family Physician 69, no.10 (May 15, 2004), available at .Google ScholarPubMed

Schum, David, “A Review of the Case against Blaise Pascal and His Heirs,” Michigan Law Review 77 (1979): 446–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schum, David, Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994).Google Scholar

Schwartz, Adina, “A Systemic Challenge to the Reliability and Admissibility of Firearms and Toolmark Identification,” The Columbia Science & Technology Law Review VI (2005): 1–42.Google Scholar

Schwarzer, William W., “Settlement of Mass Tort Actions: Order out of Chaos,” Cornell Law Review 80 (1995): 837–44.Google Scholar

Seidemann, Ryan M., et al., “Closing the Gate on Questionable Expertwitness Testimony: A Proposal to Institute Expert Review Panels,” Southern University Law Review 33, no.1 (2005): 29–91.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid, “Scientific Realism or Irenic Instrumentalism?” in Cohen, Robert and Wartofsky, Marx, eds., Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science (New York: Humanities Press, 1965), 171–204.Google Scholar

Severn, Bill, The Roaring Twenties: Prohibition and Repeal (New York: Julian Messner, 1969).Google Scholar

Shawcross, William, “Turning Dollars into Change,” Time 150, no.9, September 1, 1997, 48–57.Google Scholar

Shephard, Thomas H., “‘Proof’ of Human Teratogenicity,” Teratology 50 (1994): 97–98 (letters section).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sial, Omar, and Iqbal, Sahar, A Legal Research Guide to Pakistan, available at .

Sinclair, Upton, Boston (New York: A. C. Boni, 1928).Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, “Discovering Karl Popper,” New York Review of Books 21, no.7, May 1, 1974, 22–8.Google Scholar

Skipp, Catherine, and Campo-Flores, Arian, “A Bridge Too Far,” Newsweek, August 3, 2009, 46–51.Google Scholar

Skolnik, Andrew, “Key Witness against Morning Sickness Drug Faces Scientific Fraud Charges,” Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (1990): 1468–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skrabanek, Petr, and McCormick, James, Follies & Fallacies in Medicine (Glasgow, Scotland: Tarragon Press, 1989; reprinted Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1990).Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brain, Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic (Belmont, CA: Dickenson, 1966; 4th ed., Independence, KY: Cengage, 1999).Google Scholar

SmartJury, available at .

Smith, Richard, “Peer Review: Reform or Revolution?” British Medical Journal 315 (1997): 759–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Snow, John, On the Mode of Communication of Cholera (London: John Churchill, 1855) (reprinted, with other material, in Snow on Cholera [Cambridge, MA: Harvard Medical Library, 1936]).Google Scholar

Soifer, Valerii N., The Tragedy of Soviet Science, trans. Gruliow, Leo and Gruliow, Rebecca (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Solomon, Daniel H., et al., “Relationship between Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults,” Circulation 109 (2004): 2068–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Solomon, Jay, and Fassihi, Farnaz, “Iran Rights Envoy Assails U.N. Censure—Official Defends Stoning, Arrests, as General Assembly Committee Condemns Crackdown by Tehran,” Wall Street Journal, November 19, 2010, available at .

Solomon, Scott D., et al., “Cardiovascular Risk Associated with Rofecoxib in a Colorectal Adenoma Prevention Trial,” New England Journal of Medicine 352, no.11 (2005): 1071–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sox, Harold C., and Rennie, Drummond, “Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case,” Annals of Internal Medicine 144 (2006): 609–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Speiser, Stuart M., Krause, Charles F., and Gans, Alfred W., The American Law of Torts (Rochester, NY: The Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishing Co., and San Francisco, CA: Bancroft-Whitney Co., 1983—) (10 vols.) [vol. 6, cited in the text, appeared in 1989].Google Scholar

Starkie, Thomas, A Practical Treatise of the Law of Evidence (Philadelphia, PA: T. & J. W. Johnson, 7th ed., 1842) (2 vols.).Google Scholar

Starrs, James, “Frye v. United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” Jurimetrics Journal 26 (1986): 249–59.Google Scholar

State Justice Institute, A Judge’s Deskbook on the Basic Philosophies and Methods of Science: Model Curriculum (March 1999).

Stevenson, Charles, “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms” (1947), in Weitz, Morris, ed., 20th-Century Philosophy: The Analytic Tradition (New York: Free Press, 1966), 237–53.Google Scholar

Stewart, Thomas, and Hayes, Arthur, The World’s Most Famous Court Trial: State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes (1925), ed. Levy, Leonard W. (New York: Da Capo Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael, The Law Under the Swastika: Studies in Legal History in Nazi Germany (1994), trans. Dunlap, Thomas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Story, Joseph, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (Boston, MA: Hilliard, Gray & Co., and Cambridge, MA: Shattuck & Co., 1833) (3 vols.).Google Scholar

Stove, David, Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists (1982), reprinted under the title Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism (Paddington, Australia: Macleay Press, 1999).Google Scholar