Bach, Julian Jr.. America’s Germany: An Account of the Occupation. New York: Random House, 1946.Google Scholar

Berlin Document Center. “Who Was a Nazi? Facts about the Membership Procedure of the Nazi Party.” Berlin: 7771 Document Center, OMGUS, 1947.Google Scholar

Boveri, Margaret. “Hollerith-Maschinen oder: Der Weg zum Fragebogen.” In Amerikafibel für erwachsene Deutsche, edited by Boveri, Margret, Görtemaker, Heike B., and Heuss, Theodor, 41–61. Berlin: Landtverlag, 1946.Google Scholar

Buchwitz, Otto. Brüder, in eins nun die Hände. Berlin: Dietz, 1956.Google Scholar

Clay, Lucius. Decision in Germany. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1950.Google Scholar

Coles, Harry Lewis, and Weinberg, Albert Katz, eds. Civil Affairs: Soldiers Become Governors, United States Army in WWII Series. Washington, DC: United States Army Center of Military History, 1964.Google Scholar

Control Commission for Germany (British Element). “I.A. and C. Division, Public Safety Branch. Technical Instructions Nos. 1 to 28.” August 5, 1946.Google Scholar

Counter Intelligence Corps. “Counter Intelligence Corps History and Mission in World War II.” Baltimore, MD: Counter Intelligence Corps School, 1951.Google Scholar

Dagerman, Stig. German Autumn, 2nd ed., translated by Macpherson, Robin Fulton. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Davidson, David. The Steeper Cliff. New York: Random House, 1947.Google Scholar

Diem, Hermann. Kirche und Entnazifizierung: Denkschrift der Kirchlich-theologischen Sozietät in Württemberg. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1946.Google Scholar

Dombois, Hans. Politische Gerichtsbarkeit: der Irrweg der Entnazifizierung und die Frage des Verfassungsschutzes. Gütersloh: Kirche und Mann, 1950.Google Scholar

Donnison, Frank Siegfried Vernon. Civil Affairs and Military Government North-West Europe 1944–1946. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1966.Google Scholar

Engler, Robert. “The Individual Soldier and the Occupation.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 267 (January 1950): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyck, Frank. A Historians Pilgrimage: Memoirs and Reflections. Calgary: Detselig, 2009.Google Scholar

Friedlander, Henry, and Milton, Sybil, eds. Archives of the Holocaust, Vol. 11: Berlin Document Center, Part I. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar

Friedman, Wolfgang. The Allied Military Government in Germany. London: Stevens & Sons, 1947.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J., ed. American Experiences in Military Government in World War II. New York: Rinehart, 1948.Google Scholar

Gallup, George, and Robinson, Claude. “American Institute for Public Opinion Surveys, 1935–38.” Public Opinion Quarterly 2, no. 3 (July 1938): 373–98.Google Scholar

Gaskill, Gordon, ed. “Leaves from the Diary of a Military Commander.” American Magazine (1947): 32–33, 108–11.Google Scholar

Gollancz, Victor. In Darkest Germany. London: Victor Gollancz, 1947.Google Scholar

Griffith, William E. “The Denazification Program in the United States Zone of Germany.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 1950.Google Scholar

Griffith, William E. “Denazification in the United States Zone of Germany.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 267, no. 1 (January 1950): 68–76.Google Scholar

Gritschneder, Otto. Dead End “Denazification.” Munich: Dr. Otto Gritschneder, 1948.Google Scholar

Harris, Charles Reginald Schiller. Allied Military Administration of Italy, 1943–1945. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1957.Google Scholar

Harris, Joseph P. “Selection and Training of Civil Affairs Officers.” American Political Science Review 38, no. 2 (April 1944): 694–706.Google Scholar

Heberle, Rudolf. Review of Der Fragebogen by Ernst von Salomon. Social Forces 31, no. 3 (March 1953): 286–87.Google Scholar

Herz, John. “The Fiasco of Denazification in Germany.” Political Science Quarterly 63, no. 4 (December 1948): 569–94.Google Scholar

Hill, Russell. Struggle for Germany. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Holborn, Hajo. American Military Government: Its Organization and Policies. Washington, DC: Infantry Journal Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido, 1947.Google Scholar

House of Commons. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). 5th Series, Vol. 430. London, 1946.Google Scholar

Hunt, Irwin L. “American Military Government of Occupied Germany, 1918–1920: Report of the Officer in Charge of Civil Affairs Third Army and American Forces in Germany,” March 4, 1920. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943.Google Scholar

Hurwitz, Harold J. “Military Government in Germany: Press Reorientation.” Karlsruhe: Historical Division, European Command, 1950.Google Scholar

Hyneman, Charles S. “The Army’s Civil Affairs Training Program.” The American Political Science Review 38, no. 2 (April 1944): 342–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaspers, Karl. Die Schuldfrage. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider, 1946.Google Scholar

Kahn, Arthur D. Betrayal: Our Occupation of German. New York: Beacon, 1950.Google Scholar

Kesaris, Paul, ed. A Guide to O.S.S./State Department Intelligence and Research Reports – Germany and Its Occupied Territories during World War II. Washington, DC: University Publications of America, 1977.Google Scholar

Kesaris, Paul, ed. A Guide to O.S.S./State Department Intelligence and Research Reports: Japan and Its Occupied Territories during World War II. Washington, DC: University Publications of America, 1977.Google Scholar

Lange, Irmgard. Entnazifizierung in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Richtlinien Anweisungen, Organisation. Siegburg: Respublica-Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar

Lingg, Anton. Die Verwaltung der Nationalsozialistischen deutschen Arbeiterpartei. Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP. Munich: Franz Eher, 1941.Google Scholar

Loachner, Louis P. “‘The Idiocy of Our De-Nazification Policy.’” Reader’s Digest (June 1948): 130–36.Google Scholar

Longmire, Robert A., and Walker, Kenneth C.. “Herald of a Noisy World – Interpreting the News of All Nations, the Research and Analysis Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office: A History.” Foreign Policy Document Series No. 263. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 1995.Google Scholar

M.Z. “The British Zone in Germany.” The World Today 2, no. 12 (December 1946): 567–80.Google Scholar

Marcus, Alan. Straw to Make Brick. Boston, MA: Atlantic Little Brown, 1948.Google Scholar

Mason, John Brown. “Lessons of Wartime Military Government Training.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 267, no. 1 (January 1950): 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Noel. “Memorandum on the Policy and Practice of Denazification in the British Zone - Conference on Some Aspects of the German Problem. Vol. 2, Part 2.” Chatham House, Cultural Section, March 1948.Google Scholar

Merritt, Anna J., and Merritt, Richard L.. Public Opinion in Occupied Germany: The OMGUS Surveys, 1945–1949. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Merzyn, Friedrich, ed. Kundgebungen: Worte und Erklärungen der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland, 1945–1959. Hannover: Verlag des Amtsblattes der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland, 1959.Google Scholar

Morton, Frederic. “One Prussian’s Story.” Review of Fragebogen (The Questionnaire). The Saturday Review (January 1, 1955): 54.Google Scholar

Müller-Meiningen, Ernst. Die Parteigenossen. Munich: Kurt Desch, 1946.Google Scholar

Napoli, Joseph F. “Denazification from an American’s Viewpoint.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 264 (July 1949): 115–23.Google Scholar

Neumann, Franz L., Marcuse, Herbert, and Kirchheimer, Otto. Secret Reports on Nazi Germany: The Frankfurt School Contribution to the War Effort. Edited by Laudani, Raffaele. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Office of Military Government for Bavaria, Special Branch. “German Denazification Law and Implementation with American Directives Included.” June 15, 1946.Google Scholar

Office of Military Government for Germany, Civil Administration Division. Denazification, Cumulative Review. Report, 1 April 1947–30 April 1948. Adjutant General, OMGUS, 1948.Google Scholar

Office of the U.S. High Commissioner for Germany. Germany’s Parliament in Action: The September 1949 Debate on the Government’s Statement of Policy. Washington, DC: Office of Political Affairs, 1950.Google Scholar

Padover, Saul K. Experiment in Germany: The Story of an American Intelligence Office. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1946.Google Scholar

Passos, John Dos. Das Land des Fragebogens: 1945: Reportagen aus dem Besiegten Deutschland. Frankfurt: Rowohlt, 1945.Google Scholar

Passos, John Dos. Tour of Duty. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1946.Google Scholar

Pick, Robert. “En Route to De-Nazification.” Review of Furlough, by Franz Hoellering. Saturday Review of Literature (August 19, 1944): 10.Google Scholar

Plischke, Elmer. “Denazifying the Reich.” The Review of Politics 9, no. 2 (August 1947): 153–72.Google Scholar

Pogue, Forrest C. The Supreme Command. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, 1954.Google Scholar

Pollock, James, and Meisel, James H.. Germany under Occupation: Illustrative Materials and Documents. Ann Arbor, MI: George Wahr, 1949.Google Scholar

Popkin, Zelda. Small Victory. Bridgewater, NJ: Replica Books, 1947.Google Scholar

Posener, Julius. In Deutschland: 1945 bis 1946. Berlin: Siedler, 2001.Google Scholar

Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP, ed. Partei-Statistik der NSDAP 1935. Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1935.Google Scholar

Reid, A. K. “Canadian Participation in Civil Affairs – Military Government. Part I: Background and Beginnings.” CMHQ Report No. 140 (July 10, 1945).Google Scholar

Rey, W. H. Review of Der Fragebogen by Ernst von Salomon. Books Abroad 27, no. 1 (1953): 47–48.Google Scholar

Rohowsky, Margarete. Gleichschaltung und Ausschaltung: Beiträge zum Problem der Entnazifizierung. Berlin: Der Neue Geist, 1947.Google Scholar

Ruhm von Oppen, Beate. Documents on Germany under Occupation 1945–1954. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Salinger, Margaret. Dream Catcher: A Memoir. New York: Washington Square Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Salomon, Ernst von. The Answers of Ernst Von Salomon. Translated by Fitzgibbon, Constantine. London: Putnam, 1954.Google Scholar

Salomon, Ernst von. Der Fragebogen. Reinbeck: Rowohlt, 1951.Google Scholar

Salomon, Ernst von. Fragebogen (The Questionnaire). Translated by Fitzgibbon, Constantine. New York: Doubleday, 1955.Google Scholar

Schullze, Erich. Gesetz zur Befreiung von Nationalsozialismus und Militarismus vom 5. März 1946. Munich: Biederstein, 1947.Google Scholar

Schultz, Johannes. Abschluss der Entnazifizierung und Durchführung des Gesetzes zu Art. 131 GG in Niedersachsen. Bd. 1. Göttingen: Schwartz, 1952.Google Scholar

Setzler, Lorraine. “Nursing and Nursing Education in Germany.” The American Journal of Nursing 45, no. 12 (December 1945): 993–95.Google Scholar

Starr, Joseph R. Denazification, Occupation and Control of Germany, March–July 1945. Salisbury, NC: Documentary Publications, 1977.Google Scholar

Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force. Handbook for Military Government in Germany: Prior to Defeat or Surrender. December 1944.Google Scholar

Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force. Military Government Gazette Germany / Sixth Army Group (Twelfth Army Group and 21st Army Group) Area of Control. 1944.Google Scholar

Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force. Public Safety Manual of Procedures, Military Government of Germany. First Edition, September 1944. Second Edition, February 1945.Google Scholar

The American Jewish Committee. “Statistics on Jews.” Thirty-Ninth Annual Report (1946).Google Scholar

United States Army. “Troop I&E Bulletin: Denazification.” 3, no. 15 (April 11, 1948).Google Scholar

United States Department of Labor. “Establishment of Foreign Economic Administration.” Monthly Labor Review 57 (November 1943): 936–37.Google Scholar

United States Department of State. A Decade of American Foreign Policy: Basic Documents, 1941–49. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950.Google Scholar

United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States: Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1945.Google Scholar

United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1945, European Advisory Committee, Austria and Germany, vol. III. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.Google Scholar

Vansittart, Robert Gilbert. Black Record: Germans Past and Present. London: H. Hamilton, 1941.Google Scholar

Vollnhals, Clements. Entnazifizierung: Politische Säuberung und Rehabilitierung in den vier Besatzungszonen 1945–1949. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar

Vollnhals, Clements. Entnazifizierung und Selbstreinigung im Urteil der evangelischen Kirche: Dokumente und Reflexionen, 1945–1949. Munich: Kaiser, 1989.Google Scholar

Weber, Hermann. Das Gesetz zur Politischen Säuberung vom 5. März 1946. Karlsruhe: Badenia, 1947.Google Scholar

Zink, Harold. American Military Government in Germany. New York: Macmillan, 1947.Google Scholar

Zink, Harold. The United States in Germany, 1944–1955. New York: Van Nostrand, 1957.Google Scholar

Abel, Theodore F. Why Hitler Came into Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Adams, Bianka J. “Between Idealism and Pragmatism: The Administration and Denazification of Bremen, United States Enclave in the Context of Anglo-American Governments in the Second World War.” PhD diss., The Catholic University of America, 1998.Google Scholar

Adams, Bianka J. From Crusade to Hazard: The Denazification of Bremen Germany. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Alsen, Eberhard. J.D. Salinger and the Nazis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Andrew, Christopher. “F.H. Hinsley and the Cambridge Moles: Two Patterns of Intelligence Recruitment.” In Diplomacy and Intelligence: Essays in Honour of F.H. Hinsley, edited by Langhorne, Richard, 22–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida. Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit. Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik. Munich: Beck, 2006.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger, and Fontaine, Philippe, eds. The History of the Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Baerwald, Hans H. The Purge of Japanese Leaders under the Occupation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Balfour, Michael, and Mair, John. Four Power Control in Germany and Austria, 1945–1946. London: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Bankier, David, and Michman, Dan. Holocaust Historiography in Context: Emergence, Challenges, Polemics and Achievements. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Barnes, Trevor J. “Geographical Intelligence: American Geographers and Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services 1941–1945.” Journal of Historical Geography 32, no. 1 (2006): 149–68.Google Scholar

Battini, Michele. The Missing Italian Nuremberg: Cultural Amnesia and Postwar Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battini, Michele. Peccati di memoria. La mancata Norimberga italiana. Rome: Laterza, 2003.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F., and Newman, Leonard S.. “How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences: Motives that Shape Autobiographical Narratives.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, no. 6 (1994): 676–90.Google Scholar

Beattie, Andrew H. Allied Internment Camps in Occupied Germany: Extrajudicial Detention in the Name of Denazification, 1945–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Beniger, James R. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Berman, Ilan, and Waller, J. Michael, eds. Dismantling Tyranny: Transitioning Between Totalitarian Regimes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar

Bessel, Richard. Germany 1945: From War to Peace. New York: HarperCollins, 2009.Google Scholar

Bessel, Richard. Nazism and War. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.Google Scholar

Bessel, Richard, and Schumann, Dirk, eds. Life after Death: Approaches to a Cultural and Social History of Europe during the 1940s and 1950s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bessière, Céline et al. “L’enquête par questionnaire.” Genèses 29 (December 1997): 99–122.Google Scholar

Biddiscombe, Perry. The Denazification of Germany: A History 1945–1950. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007.Google Scholar

Biess, Frank. Homecomings: Returning POWs and the Legacies of Defeat in Postwar Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Biess, Frank, and Moeller, Robert. Histories of the Aftermath: The Legacies of the Second World War in Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Biess, Frank et al. “Forum: History of Emotions.” German History 28, no. 1 (2010): 67–80.Google Scholar

Blessing, Benita. The Antifascist Classroom: Denazification in Soviet-Occupied Germany, 1945–1949. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar

Bloxham, Donald. “The Genocidal Past in Western Germany and the Experience of Occupation, 1945–6.” European History Quarterly 34, no. 3 (2004): 305–35.Google Scholar

Blum, Matthias, and de Bromhead, Alan. “Rise and Fall in the Third Reich: Social Advancement and Nazi Membership.” European Economic Review 120 (November 2019): 1–40.Google Scholar

Blumer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish, eds. The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Boberach, Heinz et al. Richterbriefe: Dokumente zur Beeinflussung der deutschen Rechtsprechung, 1942–1944. Boppard am Rhein: H. Boldt, 1975.Google Scholar

Boehling, Rebecca L. “Sociopolitical Democratization and Economic Recovery: The Development of German Self-Government under U. S. Military Occupation: Frankfurt, Munich and Stuttgart, 1945–1949.” PhD diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1990.Google Scholar

Bohman, Eric James. “Rehearsals for Victory: The War Department and the Planning and Direction of Civil Affairs, 1940–1943.” PhD diss., Yale University, 1984.Google Scholar

Bopp, William J. “In Quest of a Police Profession: A Biography of Orlando W. Wilson.” PhD diss., Florida Atlantic University, 1975.Google Scholar

Borgstedt, Angela. “Der Fragebogen. Zur Wahrnehmung eines Symbols politischer Säuberung nach 1945.” Der Bürger im Staat 56 (2006): 166–71.Google Scholar

Botzenhart-Viehe, Verena. “The German Reaction to the American Occupation, 1944–1947.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Barbara, 1980.Google Scholar

Bower, Tom. Blind Eye to Murder: Britain, America and the Purging of Nazi Germany – A Pledge Betrayed. London: Andre Deutsch, 1981.Google Scholar

Bower, Tom. The Pledge Betrayed: America and Britain and the Denazification of Postwar Germany. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1982.Google Scholar

Braasch-Schwersmann, Ursula et al. Hessischer Städteatlas, Bd. 30. Dieburg: Philipp Schmidt, 2016.Google Scholar

Brain, Robert Michael. “The Ontology of the Questionnaire: Max Weber on Measurement and Mass Investigation.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 32, no. 4 (2001): 647–84.Google Scholar

Broadberry, Stephen, and Burhop, Carsten. “Real Wages and Labor Productivity in Britain and Germany, 1871–1938: A Unified Approach to the International Comparison of Living Standards.” The Journal of Economic History 70, no. 2 (June 2010): 400–27.Google Scholar

Brochhagen, Ulrich. Nach Nürnberg: Vergangenheitsbewältigung und Westintegration in der Ära Adenauer. Hamburg: Junius, 1994.Google Scholar

Brockmeier, Jens, and Carbaugh, Donal, eds. Narrative and Identity Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001.Google Scholar

Brogi, Alessandro. A Question of Self-Esteem the United States and the Cold War Choices in France and Italy, 1944–1958. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.Google Scholar

Broszat, Martin. German National Socialism, 1919–1945. Translated by Rosenbaum, Kurt and Böhm, Inge. Santa Barbara: Clio Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Broszat, Martin. “Politische Denunziationen in der NS-Zeit. Aus Forschungserfahrungen im Staatsarchiv München.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 73 (1977): 221–38.Google Scholar

Brückweh, Kerstin et al., eds. Engineering Society: the Role of the Human and Social Sciences in Modern Societies, 1880–1980. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

Brustein, William. The Logic of Evil: the Social Origins of the Nazi Party, 1925–1933. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Andrew. “‘Good Morning, Pupil!’ American Representations of Italianness and the Occupation of Italy, 1943–1945.” Journal of Contemporary History 43, no. 2 (2008): 217–40.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Ruth Elisabeth. Belastet oder entlastet? Dachauer Frauen im Entnazifizierungsverfahren. Munich: Utz, 2013.Google Scholar

Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish, eds. The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Campion, Corey J. “Negotiating Difference: French and American Cultural Occupation Policies and German Expectations, 1945–1949.” PhD diss., Georgetown University, 2010.Google Scholar

Canosa, Romano. Storia dell’epurazione in Italia. Milan: Baldini e Castoldi, 1999.Google Scholar

Capshew, James H. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Susan L. The Good Occupation: American Soldiers and the Hazards of Peace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Chalou, George C., ed. The Secrets War: The Office of Strategic Services in World War II. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, 1992.Google Scholar

Chauffour, Sébastien et al., eds. La France et la dénazification de l’Allemagne après 1945. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2019.Google Scholar

Childers, Thomas. The Nazi Voter: The Social Foundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919–1933. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Clare, George. Berlin Days, 1946–1947. London: Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar

Cointet, Jean-Paul. Expier Vichy: l’Épuration en France, 1943–1958. Paris: Perrin, 2008.Google Scholar

Connelly, John. Captive University: The Sovietization of East German, Czech and Polish Higher Education, 1945–1956. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Converse, Jean M. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Creuzberger, Stefan. Die sowjetische Besatzungsmacht und das politische System der SBZ. Weimar: Böhlau, 1996.Google Scholar

Cross, Gary S. Worktowners at Blackpool: Mass-Observation and Popular Leisure in the 1930s. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Cuomo, Glenn R. “The NSDAP’s Enduring Shadow: Putting in Perspective the Recent Outing of Brown Octogenarians.” German Studies Review 35, no. 2 (2012): 265–88.Google Scholar

Dack, Mikkel. “A Comparative Study of French Denazification: Instruments and Procedures in Allied Occupied Germany.” In La France et la dénazification de l’Allemagne après 1945, edited by Chauffour, Sébastien et al., 109–127. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2019.Google Scholar

Dack, Mikkel. “Die Entnazifizierung einer „Tätergesellschaft”: Bestrafung und Reintegration im besetzten Deutschland und Österreich.” In NS-Täterinnen und –Täter in der Nachkriegszeit, 59–72. Wien: KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen, 2017.Google Scholar

Dack, Mikkel. “Retreating into Trauma: The Fragebogen, Denazification, and Victimhood in Postwar Germany.” In Traumatic Memories of the Second World War and After, edited by Leese, Peter and Crouthamel, Jason, 143–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Dack, Mikkel. “Tailoring Truth: Political Amnesia, Memory Construction, and Whitewashing the Nazi Past from Below.” German Politics and Society 39, no. 1 (Spring 2021): 15–36.Google Scholar

Dastrup, Boyd. Crusade in Nuremberg: Military Occupation, 1945–1949. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985.Google Scholar

De Rivera, Joseph, and Sarbin, Theodore R., eds. Believed-in Imaginings: The Narrative Construction of Reality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998.Google Scholar

Desch, Michael. Cult of the Irrelevant: The Waning Influence of Social Science on National Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Detzen, Dominic, and Hoffmann, Sebastian. “Stigma Management and Justifications of the Self in Denazification Accounts.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31, no. 1 (2018): 141–65.Google Scholar

Dolan, Kristen. “Isolating Nazism: Civilian Internment in American Occupied Germany, 1944–1950.” PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.Google Scholar

Domenico, Roy Palmer. Italian Fascists on Trial, 1943–1948. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Douglas, Ray M. Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Drechsel, Wiltrud. “Denazification”: zur Entnazifizierung in Bremen. Bremen: Edition Temmen, 1992.Google Scholar

Dudman, Helga. Letters Home to San Francisco from Occupied Germany, 1945–1946. Jerusalem: Carta, 2007.Google Scholar

Dussault, Éric. La dénazification de l’Autriche par la France: la politique culturelle de la France dans sa zone d’occupation, 1945–1955. Quebec City: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2005.Google Scholar

Düwell, Kurt, and Matheus, Michael, eds. Kriegsende und Neubeginn: Westdeutschland und Luxemburg zwischen 1944 und 1947. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1997.Google Scholar

Ebsworth, Raymond. Restoring Democracy in Germany: The British Contribution. London: Stevens Praeger, 1961.Google Scholar

Eigler, Friederike. Gedächtnis und Geschichte in Generationenromanen seit der Wende. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2005.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Carolyn. Drawing the Line: The American Decision to Divide Germany, 1944–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Erikson, Kai T. Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1971.Google Scholar

Ericksen, Robert P. Theologians under Hitler. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Erlichman, Camilo, and Knowles, Christopher, eds. Transforming Occupation in the Western Zones of Germany: Politics, Everyday Life and Social Interactions, 1945–55. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar

Ettle, Elmar. Die Entnazifizierung in Eichstätt: Probleme der politischen Säuberung nach 1945. Frankfurt: Lang, 1985.Google Scholar

Falter, Jürgen W., Lindenberger, Thomas, and Schumann, Siegfried. Wahlen und Abstimmungen in der Weimarer Republik: Materialien zum Wahlverhalten, 1919–1933. Munich: Beck, 1986.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. Kissinger, Vol. 1, 1923–1968: The Idealist. New York: Penguin, 2015.Google Scholar

Fervert, Ute. Emotions in History: Lost and Found. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Fiedler, Anke. “Defying Memory? Tracing the Power of Hegemonic Memory in Everyday Discourse Using the Example of National Socialism in Germany.” International Journal of Communication 15 (2021): 3379–96.Google Scholar

Fireman, Gary, McVay, Ted, and Flanagan, Owen. Narrative and Consciousness Literature, Psychology, and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Fisher, Donald. “The Role of Philanthropic Foundations in the Reproduction and Production of Hegemony: Rockefeller Foundations and the Social Sciences.” Sociology 17, no. 2 (May 1983): 206–33.Google Scholar

Fitzgibbon, Constantine. Denazification. New York: Norton, 1969.Google Scholar

Fivush, Robyn, and Haden, Catherine A., eds. Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of a Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg. Geschichte, Anlage und Durchführung der Fragebogen-Erhebungen von Georg Wenkers 40 Sätzen. Dokumentation, Entdeckungen und Neubewertungen. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2017.Google Scholar

Franck, Dieter. Jahre unseres Lebens 1945–1949. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1980.Google Scholar

Frankel, Martin R., and Frankel, Lester R.. “Fifty Years of Survey Sampling in the United States.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 51, no. 2 (1987): 127–38.Google Scholar

Freeman, Mark Philip. Hindsight: The Promise and Peril of Looking Backward. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Frei, Norbert. Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Frei, Norbert. ed. Transnationale Vergangenheitspolitik: der Umgang mit deutschen Kriegsverbrechern in Europa nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2006.Google Scholar

Frei, Norbert. Vergangenheitspolitik: die Anfänge der Bundesrepublik und die NS-Vergangenheit. Munich: Beck, 1996.Google Scholar

Fritzsche, Peter. Germans into Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Fry, Helen. Denazification: Britain’s Enemy Aliens, Nazi War Criminals and the Reconstruction of Post-War Europe. Stroud, Gloucestershire: The History Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Fulbrook, Mary. German National Identity after the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Fulbrook, Mary, and Rublack, Ulinka. “In Relation: The ‘Social Self’ and Ego-Documents.” German History 28, no. 3 (September 2010): 263–72.Google Scholar

Fürstenau, Justus. Entnazifizierung. ein Kapitel deutscher Nachkriegspolitik. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1969.Google Scholar

Galimi, Valeria. “Circulation of Models of Épuration after the Second World War: From France to Italy.” In Dealing with Wars and Dictatorships: Legal Concepts and Categories in Action, edited by Israël, Liora and Mouralis, Guillaume, 197–208. The Hague: TMC Asser, 2014.Google Scholar

Gebhardt, Miriam. Als die Soldaten kamen. Die Vergewaltigung deutscher Frauen am Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs. Munich: DVA, 2015.Google Scholar

Gehrz, Christopher Allan. “The Reeducation of Germany and the Education of the West, 1945–1949.” PhD diss., Yale University, 2002.Google Scholar

Gellately, Robert. “Denunciations in Twentieth-Century Germany: Aspects of Self-policing in the Third Reich and the German Democratic Republic.” The Journal of Modern History 68, no. 4 (December 1996): 931–67.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Uta, and Gantner, Gösta. “Ritualprozeß Entnazifizierung: eine These zur gesellschaftlichen Transformation der Nachkriegszeit.” Forum Ritualdynamik 7 (July 2004): 1–80.Google Scholar

Gimbel, John. A German Community under American Occupation: Marburg, 1945–52. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Goedde, Petra. GIs and Germans: Culture, Gender, and Foreign Relations, 1945–1949. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.Google Scholar

Goltermann, Svenja. Die Gesellschaft der Überlebenden: Deutsche Kriegsheimkehrer und ihre Gewalterfahrungen im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Munich: Pantheon, 2009.Google Scholar

Gordon, Hugh. “Cheers and Tears: Relations between Canadian Soldiers and German Civilians.” PhD diss., University of Victoria, 2010.Google Scholar

Görtemaker, Heike B. Ein deutsches Leben: Die Geschichte der Margret Boveri 1900–1975. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2005.Google Scholar

Gramer, Regina Ursula. “The Socialist Revolutionary Dilemma in Emigration: Franz L. Neumann’s Passage Toward and Through the Office of Strategic Services.” MA thesis, University of Arizona, 1989.Google Scholar

Greiner, Bettina. Verdrängter Terror: Geschichte und Wahrnehmung sowjetischer Speziallager in Deutschland. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2010.Google Scholar

Grimm, Friedrich. Nun aber Schluss mit Rache und Vergeltung!: eine ernste Betrachtung, 10 Jahre nach d. Zusammenbruch. Göttingen: Göttinger Verlagsanstalt, 1955.Google Scholar

Grohnert, Reinhard. Die Entnazifizierung in Baden, 1945–1949: Konzeptionen und Praxis der “Epuration” am Beispiel eines Landes der französischen Besatzungszone. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1991.Google Scholar

Grossmann, Atina. “Feminist Debates about Women and National Socialism.” Gender & History 3, no. 3 (1991): 350–58.Google Scholar

Grossmann, Atina. Jews, Germans, and Allies: Close Encounters in Occupied Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Gudehus, Christian. Dem Gedächtnis zuhören: Erzählungen über NS-Verbrechen und ihre Repräsentation in deutschen Gedenkstätten. Essen: Klartext, 2006.Google Scholar

Guglielmo, Mark. “The Contribution of Economists to Military Intelligence during World War II.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 1 (2008): 109–50.Google Scholar

Hamdan, Amal. “Collective Guilt, Selective Exclusion: Iraq’s Candidate Screening Process.” International Foundation for Electoral Systems (March 2020): 1–31.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Richard. Who Voted for Hitler? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Hageman, Karen, and Michel, Sonya, eds. Gender and the Long Postwar: The United States and the Two Germanys, 1945–1989. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hayse, Michael. Recasting West German Elites: Higher Civil Servants, Business Leaders, and Physicians in Hessen, 1945–1955. New York: Berghahn, 2003.Google Scholar

Hearst, Joseph Albert. “The Evolution of Allied Military Government Policy in Italy.” PhD diss., Columbia University, 1960.Google Scholar

Heinemann, Elizabeth. What Difference Does a Husband Make? Women and Marital Status in Nazi and Postwar Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Henke, Klaus-Dietmar. Die amerikanische Besetzung Deutschlands. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1995.Google Scholar

Henke, Klaus-Dietmar. Politik der Widersprüche: zur Charakteristik der französischen Militärregierung in Deutschland nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1982.Google Scholar

Henke, Klaus-Dietmar. Politische Säuberung unter französischer Besatzung: die Entnazifizierung in Württemberg-Hohenzollern. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepper, Erica G. et al. “Pancultural Nostalgia: Prototypical Conceptions Across Cultures.” Emotions 14, no. 4 (August 2014): 733–47.Google Scholar

Herf, Jeffrey. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Herman, Judith. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Hermand, Jost. Ernst von Salomon. Wandlungen eines Nationalrevolutionärs. Leipzig: Hirzel, 2002.Google Scholar

Hett, Benjamin Carter. “The Story Is about Something Fundamental: Nazi Criminals, History, Memory, and the Reichstag Fire.” Central European History 48, no. 2 (June 2015): 199–224.Google Scholar

Hockenos, Matthew D. A Church Divided: German Protestants Confront the Nazi Past. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Peter. Widerstand, Staatsstreich Attentat: der Kampf der Opposition gegen Hitler. Munich: Piper, 1970.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Walther G. Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Springer, 1965.Google Scholar

Höhn, Maria. GIs and Fräuleins: The German-American Encounter in 1950s West Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Translated by O’Connell, Matthew J.. New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Joseph. Artists in Exile: How Refugees from Twentieth-Century War and Revolution Transformed the American Performing Arts. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.Google Scholar

Hydén, Lars-Christer, and Brockmeier, Jens. Health, Illness and Culture: Broken Narratives. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Igo, Sarah E. The Average American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Irvine, William D. Between Justice and Politics: The Ligue des Droits de L’homme, 1898–1945. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Israël, Liora, and Mouralis, Guillaume, eds. Dealing with Wars and Dictatorships: Legal Concepts and Categories in Action. The Hague: TMC Asser, 2014.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Harald, and Rumschöttel, Hermann. “Das Forschungsprojekt ‘Widerstand und Verfolgung in Bayern 1933–1945.’” Archivalische Zeitschrift 73, no. 1 (1977): 209–20.Google Scholar

Jähner, Harald. Aftermath: Life in the Fallout of the Third Reich, 1945–1955. Translated by Whiteside, Shaun. New York: Knopf, 2022.Google Scholar

Jarausch, Konrad. After Hitler: Recivilizing Germans, 1945–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jeffery, Keith. MI6: The History of the Secret Intelligence Service, 1909–1949. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar

Jensen, Olaf. Geschichte machen: Strukturmerkmale des intergenerationellen Sprechens über die NS-Vergangneheit in deutschen Familien. Tübingen: Edition Diskord, 2004.Google Scholar

Jerouschek, Günter, Marßolek, Inge, and Röckelein, Hedwig, eds. Denunziation: Historische, juristische und psychologische Aspekte. Tübingen: Edition Diskord, 1997.Google Scholar

Johnson, Eric A. “German Women and Nazi Justice: Their Role in the Process from Denunciation to Death.” Historical Social Research 20, no. 1 (73) (1995): 33–69.Google Scholar

Jones, Jill. “Eradicating Nazism from the British Zone of Germany: Early Policy and Practice.” German History 8, no. 2 (June 1990): 145–62.Google Scholar

Jones, Jill. Preparations for Denazification in the British Zone of Germany. PhD diss. University of Manchester, 1988.Google Scholar

Judt, Tony. Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. New York: Penguin Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Jürgensen, Kurt. “British Occupation Policy after 1945 and the Problem of Re-educating Germany.” History 68 (1983): 225–44.Google Scholar

Jurt, Joseph, ed. Von der Besatzungszeit zur deutsch-französischen Kooperation. Freiburg: Rombach, 1993.Google Scholar

Justice, Benjamin. “When the Army Got Progressive: The Civil Affairs Training School at Stanford University, 1943–1945.” History of Education Quarterly 51, no. 3 (August 2011): 330–61.Google Scholar

Kanig, Christian. “Reeducation through Soviet Culture: Soviet Cultural Policy in Occupied Germany, 1945–1949.” PhD diss., Indiana University, 2011.Google Scholar

Kater, Michael H. The Nazi Party: A Social Profile of Members and Leaders, 1919–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Keltner, Hubert W. “Denazification: Problem and Program, U.S. Zone, 1945–1949.” MA thesis, Montana State University, 1954.Google Scholar

Kershaw, Ian. The Nazi Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation, 4th ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Kettenacker, Lothar, ed. Ein Volk von Opfern. Die neue Debatte um den Bombenkrieg 1940–1945. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2003.Google Scholar

Keyserlingk, Robert H. “Arnold Toynbee’s Foreign Research and Press Service, 1939–43 and Its Post-War Plans for South-East Europe.” Journal of Contemporary History 21, no. 4 (October 1986): 539–58.Google Scholar

Klee, Ernst. Persilscheine und falsche Pässe. wie die Kirchen den Nazis halfen. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1991.Google Scholar

Klein, Markus Josef. Ernst von Salomon: Eine politische Biographie mit einer vollständigen Bibliographie. Limburg: San Casciano, 1994.Google Scholar

Knafla, Louis A. Policing and War in Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Knight, Robert. Denazification and Integration in the Austrian Province of Carinthia. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2007.Google Scholar

Koellreutter, Otto. Das Wesen der Spruchkammern und der durch sie durchgeführten Entnazifizierung: ein Rechtsgutsachten. Göttingen: Göttinger Verlagsanstalt, 1954.Google Scholar

Kurz, Hans-Otto. “1945: Chaos, Not und Neubeginn.” Mein Heimatland 8, no. 54 (August 2015): 29–32.Google Scholar

Kurz, Hans-Otto. “Der Kreis Hersfeld 1945/1946.” Hersfelder Geschichtsblätter 7 (2015): 7–77.Google Scholar

Kurz, Hans-Otto. “Leben an und mit der Grenze im Kreis Hersfeld-Rotenburg.” Hersfelder Geschichtsblätter 4 (2010): 1–50.Google Scholar

Kyre, Martin, and Kyre, Joan. Military Occupation and National Security. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Langhorne, Richard, ed. Diplomacy and Intelligence during the Second World War: Essays in Honour of F.H. Hinsley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Laschitza, Horst. Kämpferische Demokratie gegen Faschismus. Berlin: Deutscher Militärverlag, 1969.Google Scholar

Leese, Peter, and Crouthamel, Jason, eds. Traumatic Memories of the Second World War and After. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Leßau, Hanne. Entnazifizierungsgeschichten. Die Auseinandersetzung mit der eigenen NS-Vergangenheit in der frühen Nachkriegszeit. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2020.Google Scholar

Leiby, Richard A. “Public Health in Occupied Germany 1945–1949.” PhD diss., University of Delaware, 1984.Google Scholar

Lilly, J. Robert. Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Link, Fabian. “Cooperation and Competition: Re-establishing the Institute of Social Research and the Emergence of the ‘Frankfurt School.’” NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 24, no. 2 (2016): 225–49.Google Scholar

Long, Bronson. No Easy Occupation: French Control of the German Saar, 1944–1957. Rochester: Camden House, 2015.Google Scholar

Longerich, Peter. Die braunen Bataillone: Geschichte der SA. Munich: Beck, 1989.Google Scholar

Loth, Wilfried, and Rusinek, Bernd-A., eds. Verwandlungspolitik: NS-Eliten in der westdeutschen Nachkriegsgesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Lowe, Keith. Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II. New York: Picador, 2013.Google Scholar

Lupo, Salvatore. History of the Mafia. Translated by Shugaar, Antony. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

MacDonogh, Giles. After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation. New York: Basic Books, 2007.Google Scholar

MacPherson, Nelson. American Intelligence in War-Time London: The Story of the OSS. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar

MacPherson, Nelson. Kings and Desperate Men: The United States Office of Strategic Services in London and the Anglo-American Relationship, 1941–1946. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995.Google Scholar

MacPherson, Nelson. “Reductio Ad Absurdum: The R&A Branch of OSS/London.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence 15, no. 3 (November 2002): 390–414.Google Scholar

Mann, Anthony. Comeback: Germany, 1945–1952. London: Macmillan, 1980.Google Scholar

Markovits, Inga. Imperfect Justice: An East-West German Diary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Marquardt-Bigman, Petra. Amerikanische Geheimdienstanalysen über Deutschland 1942–1949. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2015.Google Scholar

Marshall, Barbara. “German Attitudes to British Military Government, 1945–47.” Journal of Contemporary History 15, no. 4 (October 1980): 655–84.Google Scholar

Marshall, Barbara. The Origins of Post-War German Politics. London: Croom Helm, 1988.Google Scholar

Masuda, Hiroshi. MacArthur in Asia: The General and His Staff in the Philippines, Japan, and Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, and de Greiff, Pablo. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council, 2007.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark. Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century. London: Allen Lane, 1998.Google Scholar

McAdams, Dan P., Josselson, Ruthellen, and Lieblich, Amia. Identity and Story: Creating Self in Narrative. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006.Google Scholar

McAdams, James. Judging the Past in Unified Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Elizabeth P. Sisterhood of Spies: The Women of the OSS. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Meehan, Patricia. A Strange Enemy People: Germans under the British, 1945–1950. London: Peter Owen, 2001.Google Scholar

Mesner, Maria, and Berg, Matthew Paul. Entnazifizierung zwischen politischem Anspruch, Parteienkonkurrenz und Kaltem Krieg: das Beispiel der SPÖ. Vienna: Oldenbourg, 2005.Google Scholar

Meyer, Kathrin. Entnazifizierung von Frauen: die Internierungslager der US-Zone Deutschlands 1945–1952. Berlin: Metropol, 2004.Google Scholar

Miklaucic, Michael, and Hughes, Michelle, ed. Impunity: Confronting Illicit Power Structures in War and Transition. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 2016.Google Scholar

Moeller, Robert G. War Stories: The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Möhler, Rainer. Entnazifizierung in Rheinland-Pfalz und im Saarland unter Französischer Besatzung von 1945 bis 1952. Mainz: Hase & Koehler, 1992.Google Scholar

Montgomery, John. Forced to Be Free: The Artificial Revolution in Germany and Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Mouton, Michelle. “Missing, Lost, and Displaced Children in Postwar Germany: The Great Struggle to Provide for the War’s Youngest Victims.” Central European History 48 (2015): 53–78.Google Scholar

Mühlberger, Detlef. Hitler’s Followers: Studies in the Sociology of the Nazi Movement. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Mühlenberg, Jutta. Das SS-Helferinnenkorps: Ausbildung, Einsatz und Entnazifizierung der Weiblichen Angehörigen der Waffen-SS, 1942–1949. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2010.Google Scholar

Müller, Tim B. Krieger und Gelehrte: Herbert Marcuse und die Denksysteme im Kalten Krieg. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2012.Google Scholar

Murray, Gregg R. et al. “Convenient Yet Not a Convenience Sample: Jury Pools as Experimental Subject Pools.” Social Science Research 42 (2013): 246–53.Google Scholar

Naimark, Norman. The Russians in Germany: A History of the Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945–1949. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Nettl, J. P. The Eastern Zone and Soviet Policy in Germany, 1945–1950. London: Oxford University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Neumann, Franz L. Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944. New York: Octagon Books, 1963.Google Scholar

Neumann, Franz L. The Cultural Migration: The European Scholar in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Niethammer, Lutz. Die Mitläuferfabrik: Die Entnazifizierung Am Beispiel Bayerns. Berlin: Dietz, 1982.Google Scholar

Niethammer, Lutz. Entnazifizierung in Bayern: Säuberung und Rehabilitierung unter amerikanischer Besatzung. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1972.Google Scholar

Niven, Bill. Germans as Victims: Remembering the Past in Contemporary Germany. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar

Novick, Peter, Ternois, Helene, and Rioux, Jean Pierre. L’epuration francaise, 1944–1949. Paris: Balland, 1991.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Andrea. “American-German Encounters and U.S. Foreign Policy in Occupied Germany, 1945–1949.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 2012.Google Scholar

Oba, Kentaro et al. “Memory and Reward Systems Coproduce ‘Nostalgic’ Experiences in the Brain.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11, no. 7 (July 2016): 1069–77.Google Scholar

Orlow, Dietrich. A History of Modern Germany: 1871 to Present, 7th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2011.Google Scholar

Overmans, Rüdiger. Deutsche militärische Verluste im Zeiten Weltkrieg. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1999.Google Scholar

Parkinson, Anna M. An Emotional State: The Politics of Emotion in Postwar West German Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Phillips, David. “War-Time Planning for the ‘Re-education’ of Germany: Professor E.R. Dodds and the German Universities.” Oxford Review of Education 12, no. 2 (1986): 195–208.Google Scholar

Port, Andrew I. Conflict and Stability in the German Democratic Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Potter, Pamela M. Art of Suppression: Confronting the Nazi Past in Histories of the Visual and Preforming Arts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Price, David H. Anthropological Intelligence: The Deployment and Neglect of American Anthropology in the Second World War. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Quinney, Kimber Marie. “The United States, Great Britain, and Dismantling Italian Fascism, 1943–1948.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2002.Google Scholar

Quint, Peter. The Imperfect Union. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rausch, Stefanie. “Good Bets, Bad Bets and Dark Horses: Allied Intelligence Officers’ Encounters with German Civilians, 1944–1945.” Central European History 53 (2020): 120–45.Google Scholar

Rees, Jonas H., Papendick, Michael, and Zick, Andreas. “This Ain’t No Place for No Hero: Prevalence and Correlates of Representations of Victims, Helpers, and Perpetrators during the Time of National Socialism in German Families.” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 15 (2021): 1–12.Google Scholar

Reinisch, Jessica. The Perils of Peace: The Public Health Crisis in Occupied Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Remy, Steven P. The Heidelberg Myth: The Nazification and Denazification of a German University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Remy, Steven P. “The Heidelberg Myth: The Nazification and Denazification of a German University, 1933–1957.” PhD diss., Ohio University, 2000.Google Scholar

Reusch, Ulrich. Deutsches Berufsbeamtentum und britische Besatzung: Planung und Politik 1943–1947. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1985.Google Scholar

Roberts, Geoffrey K. “Political Education in Germany.” Parliamentary Affairs 55, no. 3 (July 2002): 556–68.Google Scholar

Roche, Helen. “Surviving Stunde Null: Narrating the fate of Nazi elite-school pupils during the collapse of the Third Reich.” German History 33, no. 4 (2015): 570–87.Google Scholar

Roche, Helen. The Third Reich’s Elite Schools: A History of the Napolas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Rösch, Felix. Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of International Relations: A European Discipline in America? Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Frances. “The Anglo-German Encounter in Occupied Hamburg, 1945–1950.” PhD diss., Columbia University, 2006.Google Scholar

Rosenwein, Barbara H. Emotional Communities in the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ross, Dorothy. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ross, Dorothy, and Porter, Theodore M.. The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Rühmkorf, Peter. Wolfgang Borchert in Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1962.Google Scholar

Sa’adah, Anne. Germany’s Second Chance: Trust, Justice, and Democratization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sarbin, Theodore R. Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar

Scharf, Claus, and Schröder, Hans-Jürgen, eds. Die Deutschlandpolitik Frankreichs und die Französische Zone, 1945–1949. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1983.Google Scholar

Scheu, Just. “Der Fragebogen.” In Wir sind so frei: Kabarett in Restdeutschland 1945–1970, edited by Kühn, Volker, 61–62. Weinheim: Quadriga, 1993.Google Scholar

Schildt, Axel. Medien-Intellektuelle in der Bundesrepublik. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2020.Google Scholar

Schlemmer, Thomas, and Schrafstetter, Susanna, eds. “After Nazism: Relaunching Careers in Germany and Austria.” Special issue of German Yearbook of Contemporary History 5 (2021).Google Scholar

Schmädeke, Jürgen, and Steinbach, Peter, eds. Der Widerstand gegen den Nationalsozialismus: die deutsche Gesellschaft und der Widerstand gegen Hitler. Munich: Piper, 1985.Google Scholar

Schmitz, Helmut. A Nation of Victims? Representations of German Wartime Suffering from 1945 to the Present. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007.Google Scholar

Schöck-Quinteros, Eva, and Ahrens, Jan-Hauke. “‘Was verstehen wir Frauen auch von Politik?’: Entnazifizierung ganz normaler Frauen in Bremen (1945–1952).” Bremen: Universität Bremen, Institut für Geschichtswissenschaft, 2011.Google Scholar

Schramm, Percy E. Kriegstagebuch des Oberkommandos der Wehrmacht: 1940–1945. Frankfurt: Bernard & Graefe, 1961.Google Scholar

Schrenck-Notzing, Caspar von. Charakterwäsche: Die Re-education der Deutschen und ihre bleibenden Auswirkungen. Graz: Ares, 2015.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Steven M. To Forget It All and Begin Anew: Reconciliation in Occupied Germany, 1944–1954. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Schulte, Jan Erik, and Wildt, Michael, eds. Die SS nach 1945: Entschuldungsnarrative, populäre Mythen, europäische Erinnerungsdiskurse. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2018.Google Scholar

Schuster, Armin. Die Entnazifizierung in Hessen, 1945–1954: Vergangenheitspolitik in Der Nachkriegszeit. Wiesbaden: Historische Kommission für Nassau, 1999.Google Scholar

Schwarze, Gisela. Eine Region in demokratischen Aufbau. Der Regierungsbezirk Münster 1945/46. Schwann: Düsseldorf, 1984.Google Scholar

Sebald, W. G. The Emigrants. New York: New Directions, 1996.Google Scholar

Sebald, W. G. Luftkrieg und Literatur. Frankfurt: Fischer, 2002.Google Scholar

Sérant, Paul. Die politischen Säuberungen in Westeuropa am Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges in Deutschland, Österreich, Belgien, Dänemark, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Italien, Luxemburg, Norwegen, den Niederlanden und der Schweiz. Oldenburg: G. Stalling, 1966.Google Scholar

Seruya, Teresa. “Gedanken und Fragen beim Übersetzen von Ernst von Salomons Der Fragebogen.” In Konflikt – Grenze – Dialog: Kulturkontrastive und Interdisziplinäre Textzugänge, edited by Lehmann, Jürgen et al., 227–37. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar

Sharp, Tony. The Wartime Alliance and the Zonal Division of Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Shibata, Masako. Japan and Germany under the U.S. Occupation: A Comparative Analysis of Post-War Education Reform. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Sica, Emanuele, and Carrier, Richard, eds. Italy and the Second World War: Alternative Perspectives. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar

Sissons, Miranda, and Al-Saiedi, Abdulrazzaq. “A Bitter Legacy: Lessons of De-Baathification in Iraq.” International Center for Transitional Justice (March 2013): 1–46.Google Scholar

Smith, Bradley F. Reaching Judgment at Nuremberg. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Smith, Bradley F. The Shadow Warriors: O.S.S. and the Origins of the C.I.A. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Smith, Richard Harris. OSS: The Secret History of America’s First Central Intelligence Agency. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Snowman, Daniel. The Hitler Émigrés Revisited. London: Research Centre for German and Austrian Exile Studies, 2013.Google Scholar

Sollors, Werner. “‘Everyone Gets Fragebogened Sooner or Later’: The Denazification Questionnaire as Cultural Text.” German Life and Letters 71, no. 2 (April 2018): 139–53.Google Scholar

Standifer, Leon C. Binding up the Wounds: An American Soldier in Occupied Germany, 1945–1946. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Stein, Harold. American Civil-Military Decisions: A Book of Case Studies. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Stephan, Alexander, and van Heurck, Jan. “Communazis”: FBI Surveillance of German Émigré Writers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stiefel, Dieter. Entnazifizierung in Österreich. Vienna: Europaverlag, 1981.Google Scholar

Strunk, Peter. Zensur und Zensoren: Medienkontrolle und Propagandapolitik unter sowjetischer Besatzungsherrschaft in Deutschland. Berlin: Akademie, 1996.Google Scholar

Szanajda, Andrew. “The Prosecution of Informers in Eastern Germany, 1945–1951.” The International History Review 34, no. 1 (March 2012): 139–60.Google Scholar

Taberner, Stuart, and Berger, Karina, ed. Germans as Victims in the Literary Fiction of the Berlin Republic. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2009.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick. Exorcising Hitler: The Occupation and Denazification of Germany. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Taylor, Frederick. Zwischen Krieg und Frieden: Die Besetzung und Entnazifizierung Deutschlands 1944–1946. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar

Taylor, Nick. American-Made: The Enduring Legacy of the WPA: When FDR Put the Nation to Work. New York: Bantam, 2008.Google Scholar

Tent, James. Mission on the Rhine: Reeducation and Denazification in American-Occupied Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Thacker, Toby. The End of the Third Reich: Defeat, Denazification & Nuremburg January 1944–November 1946. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2006.Google Scholar

Thompson, Steven K. Sampling, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Google Scholar

Thorne, Christopher. “Chatham House, Whitehall, and Far Eastern Issues: 1941–1945.” International Affairs 54, no. 1 (January 1978): 1–29.Google Scholar

Trogdon, Gary A. “A Decade of Catching Spies: The United States Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps, 1943–1953.” PhD diss., University of Nebraska, 2001.Google Scholar

Tscharntke, Denise. Re-educating German Women: The Work of the Women’s Affairs Section of the British Military Government 1946–1951. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2003.Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, Yuka Moriguchi. “Military Occupation as Pedagogy: The U.S. Re-education and Reorientation Policy for Occupied Japan, 1945–1952.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota, 2004.Google Scholar

Tsvetkova, Natalia. Failure of American and Soviet Cultural Imperialism in German Universities, 1945–1990. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Turner, Ian D., ed. Reconstruction in Post-War Germany: British Occupation Policy and the Western Zones, 1945–1955. Oxford: Berg, 1989.Google Scholar

van Melis, Damian. “Denazification in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.” German History 13, no. 3 (1995): 355–70.Google Scholar

van Melis, Damian. Entnazifizierung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: Herrschaft und Verwaltung 1945–1948. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1999.Google Scholar

Vincent, Marie-Bénédicte. “La prise en compte de plusieurs générations dans la méthode prosopographique: L’exemple des hauts fonctionnaires prussiens sous l’Empire et la République de Weimar,” Genèses 56 (September 2004): 117–30Google Scholar

Vincent, Marie-Bénédicte. “La sanction des falsificateurs de la dénazification ou comment s’élabore une éthique de la fonction publique ouestallemande après 1945, entre héritage weimarien et renouvellement,” Allemagne d’aujourd’hui 208 (2014): 43–55Google Scholar

Vogt, Timothy. Denazification in the Soviet-Occupation Zone of Germany: Brandenburg, 1945–1948. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Vollnhals, Clemens. “Die evangelische Kirche zwischen Traditionswahrung und Neuorientierung.” In Von Stalingrad zur Währungsreform: zur Sozialgeschichte des Umbruchs in Deutschland, 3rd ed., edited by Broszat, Martin, Henke, Klaus-Dietmar, and Woller, Hans, 113–67. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1990.Google Scholar

Weckel, Ulrike. Beschämende Bilder: Deutsche Reaktionen auf allierte Dokumentarfilme über befreite Konzentrationslager. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2012.Google Scholar

Weine, Steven M. et al. “Guidelines for International Training in Mental Health and Psychosocial Interventions for Trauma Exposed Populations in Clinical and Community Settings.” Psychiatry 65, no. 2 (2002): 156–64.Google Scholar

Welsh, Helga A. Revolutionärer Wandel auf Befehl? Entnazifizierungs- und Personalpolitik in Thüringen und Sachsen, 1945–1948. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1989.Google Scholar

Welzer, Harald, Moller, Sabine, and Tschuggnall, Karoline. “Opa war kein Nazi”: Nationalsozialismus und Holocaust im Familiengedächtnis. Frankfurt: Fischer, 2002.Google Scholar

Werner, Hans-Georg. Deutsche Literatur im Überblick. Leipzig: Reclam, 1965.Google Scholar

Whitby, Andrew. The Sum of the People: How the Census Has Shaped Nations, from the Ancient World to the Modern Age. New York: Basic Books, 2020.Google Scholar

Wiecki, Stefan. “Professors in Purgatory: Denazification of Munich University, 1945–1955.” PhD diss., Brandeis University, 2009.Google Scholar

Wiesen, S. Jonathan. “Overcoming Nazism: Big Business, Public Relations, and the Politics of Memory.” Central European History 29, no. 2 (1996): 201–26.Google Scholar

Williams, Isobel. Allies and Italians under Occupation Sicily and Southern Italy 1943–45. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Williams, Kieran, Fowler, Brigid, and Szczebiak, Aleks. “Explaining Lustration in Central Europe: A ‘Post-communist Politics’ Approach.” Democratization 12, no. 1 (2005): 22–54.Google Scholar

Willis, Frank Roy. The French in Germany, 1945–1949. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Winks, Robin W. Cloak and Gown: Scholars in the Secret War, 1939–1961. New York: Morrow, 1987.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert, ed. Americans as Proconsuls: United States Military Government in Germany and Japan, 1944–1952. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Woller, Hans. Die Abrechnung mit dem Faschismus in Italien 1943 bis 1948. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1996.Google Scholar

Woller, Hans. Gesellschaft und Politik in der amerikanischen Besatzungszone: die Region Ansbach und Fürth. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1986.Google Scholar

Wyneken, JonDavid. “Driving Out the Demons: German Churches, the Western Allies, and the Internationalization of the Nazi Past, 1945–1952.” PhD diss., Ohio University, 2007.Google Scholar

Zeren, Aysegul Keskin. “From De-Nazification of Germany to De-Baathification of Iraq.” Political Science Quarterly 132, no. 2 (2017): 259–91.Google Scholar

Ziemke, Earl. The U.S. Army in the Occupation of Germany 1944–1946. Washington, DC: Army Historical Series, 1975.Google Scholar

Zülsdorf-Kersting, Meik. Sechzig Jahre danach: Jugendliche und Holocaust: Eine Studie zur geschichtskulturellen Sozialisation. Münster: Lit, 2007.Google Scholar