The legal framework governing proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) neither guarantees access to justice for children nor is it a child-sensitive procedure. Indeed, it does not allow for a direct hearing for children, nor does it provide them with an independent representative in cases of – potential or actual – conflict of interests. However, the Court has recently proved more conscious of such loopholes, and there is a trend towards the overcoming of such issues. The present contribution analyses this trend and justifies it by resorting to the interpretative reference to different international conventions, to the procedural rules of other international courts and tribunals dealing with similar issues and to the national law of some state parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Although the recent developments in the Court's case law could be explained by resorting to those interpretative tools, it will be suggested that the adoption of a specific provision in the Rules of Court, dealing with child access to the Strasbourg justice system and child representation in proceedings, would be the best solution for ensuring the adequate protection of children's procedural rights, while at the same time securing procedural fairness and legal certainty.