Adam, Silke. 2007a. “Domestic Adaptions of Europe: A Comparative Study of the Debates on EU Enlargement and a Common Constitution in the German and French Quality Press.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19 (4): 409–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, Silke. 2007b. Symbolische Netzwerke in Europa: Der Einfluss der nationalen Ebene auf europäische Öffentlichkeit. Deutschland und Frankreich im Vergleich. Köln: Halem.Google Scholar

Adam, Silke. 2008a. “Do Mass Media Portray Europe as a Community? German and French Debates on EU Enlargement and a Common Constitution.”Javnost – The Public 15 (1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, Silke. 2008b. “Medieninhalte aus der Netzwerkperspektive: Neue Erkenntnisse durch die Kombination von Inhalts-und Netzwerkanalyse.” Publizistik 53 (2): 180–99.

Adam, Silke, and Maier, Michaela. 2011. “National Parties as Politicizers of EU Integration? Party Campaign Communication in the Run-Up to the 2009 European Parliament Election.”European Union Politics 12 (3): 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, Silke, and Pfetsch, Barbara. 2009. “Europa als Konflikt in nationalen Medien – Zur Politisierung der Positionen in der Integrationsdebatte.” In Pfetsch, Barbara and Marcinkowski, Frank (eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie: PVS-Sonderheft 42. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 559–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel. 2013. “Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates.” In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications, pp. 112–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.). 2011. International Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Albrow, Martin. 2001. “Society as Social Diversity: The Challenge for Governance in the Global Age.” In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed.), Governance in the 21st Century. Paris: OECD, pp. 179–219.Google Scholar

Anduiza, Eva, Cristancho, Camilo, and Sabucedo, Jose. 2014. “Mobilization through Online Social Networks: The Political Protest of the Indignados in Spain.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (6): 750–64.CrossRef

Ansolabehere, Steven, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.”American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. 1963. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytic Framework.” American Political Science Review 57 (3): 632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, Jessica, and Holland, Martin (eds.). 2007. European Union Identity: Perceptions from Europe and Asia. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef

Bakvis, Herman, Baier, Gerald, and Brown, Doug. 2009. Contested Federalism: Certainty and Ambiguity in the Canadian Federation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Balme, Richard, and Chabanet, Didier. 2008. European Governance and Democracy: Power and Protest in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barroso, José Manuel. 2005. “Building an Open Europe in Times of Change.” In European Ideas Network, speech at European Ideas Network, Lisbon, September 22.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1991. “Is Democracy Special?” In Barry, Brian (ed.), Democracy and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 24–60.Google Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 2005. Restructuring Europe. Oxford:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 2006. “Should the Union Be Politicized? Prospects and Risks.”Notre Europe Policy Paper 19: 28–50.Google Scholar

Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam M.. 2012a. Sharing the Pain: What Explains Public Opinion Towards International Financial Bailouts? MIT Political Science Department Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam M.. 2012b. Studying Public Opinion on Multidimensional Politics: The Case of the Eurozone Bailouts. MIT Political Science Department Working Papers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.”American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 2006. The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge:Polity Press.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 2012. Das deutsche Europa. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, and Grande, Edgar. 2007. Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.). 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Bennett, Andrew, and George, Alexander. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. “Communicating Global Activism: Strengths and Vulnerabilities of Networked Politics.”Information, Communication & Society 6 (2): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance. 2012. News: The Politics of Illusion. 9th edn. New York: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance, Foot, Kirsten, and Xenos, Michael. 2011. “Narratives and Network Organization: A Comparison of Fair Trade Systems in Two Nations.” Journal of Communication 61: 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance, Lang, Sabine, Segerberg, Alexandra, and Knappe, Henrike. 2011. “Public Engagement vs. Institutional Influence Strategies: Comparing Trade and Environmental Advocacy Networks at the National and EU Levels in Germany and the UK.” Paper presented at the 6th European Consortium for Political Research. Reykjavik: University of Iceland, August 25–27.

Bennett, W. Lance, and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2011. “Digital Media and the Personalization of Collective Action: Social Technology and the Organization of Protests against the Global Economic Crisis.” Information, Communication & Society 14: 770–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance, and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyers, Jan. 2005. “Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials.”International Organization 59 (4): 899–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyers, Jan, and Kerremans, Bart. 2004. “Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Societal Interests: How is European Policy Making Politicized?”Comparative Political Studies 37 (10): 1119–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James. 1998. “The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.”Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James, and Regh, William. 2011. “Jürgen Habermas.” In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition). Available at .

Boomgaarden, Hajo G., Vliegenthart, Jens, De Vreese, Claes H., and Schuck, Andreas R. T.. 2010. “News on the Move: Exogenous Events and News Coverage of the European Union.”Journal of European Public Policy 17 (4): 506–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. 2005. “Europeanization: How the European Union Interacts with its Member States.” In Bulmer, Simon and Lequesne, Christian (eds.), The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–69.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. (ed.) 2009. Coping with Accession to the European Union: New Modes of Environmental Governance, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas. 2007. “Europeanization: The Domestic Impact of EU Politics.” In Jorgensen, Knud Erik, Pollack, Mark A., and Rosamond, Ben (eds.), Handbook of European Union Politics. London: Sage Publications, pp. 483–504.Google Scholar

boyd, danah, and Heer, Jeffrey. 2006. “Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster.” In Proceedings of Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39). Kauai, HI: IEEE Computer Society, January 4–7, 2006.Google Scholar

Brannigan, Augustine. 2004. The Rise and Fall of Social Psychology: The Use and Misuse of the Experimental Method. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brüggemann, Michael. 2008. Europäische Öffentlichkeit durch Öffentlichkeitsarbeit? Die Informationspolitik der Europäischen Kommission. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar

Brüggemann, Michael. 2009. “Der Mythos vom Dialog mit den Bürgern: Der Beitrag der Europäischen Kommission zur Schaffung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit.” TranState Working Papers No. 84. Bremen: Sonderforschungsbereich 597 “Staatlichkeit im Wandel”.Google Scholar

Brüggemann, Michael, Hepp, Andreas, Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katharina, and Wessler, Hartmut. 2009. “Transnationale Öffentlichkeit in Europa: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven.” Publizistik 54: 391–414.

Bruter, Michael. 2005. Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruter, Michael. 2009. “Time Bomb: The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens.”Comparative Political Studies 42 (December): 1498–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruter, Michael. 2011. “Europolity? Seven Paradoxes about European Identity.” Salzburg Paper on European Integration, No. 03–11.

Bruter, Michael, and Harrison, Sarah. 2009. The Future of our Democracies?Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruter, Michael, and Harrison, Sarah. 2012. “How European Do You Feel?” Report presented at the UK Houses of Parliament on a Mass Study on European Identity.

Byrnes, Timothy, and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.). 2006. Religion in an Expanding Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Calhoun, Craig. 2003. “The Democratic Integration of Europe: Interests, Identity and the Public Sphere.” In Berezein, Mabel and Schain, Martin (eds.), Europe without Borders: Remapping Territory, Citizenship and Identity in a Transnational Age. Baltimore, MD, and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 243–74.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian. 1963. Threats to Validity: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni. 2002. “Anti-System Parties: A Conceptual Reassessment.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (1): 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Case, Holly. 2009. “Being European: East and West.” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.), European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cederman, Lars-Erik 2001. “Nationalism and Bounded Integration: What it Would Take to Construct a European Demos.”European Journal of International Relations 7 (2): 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999. “Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe.”International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. (ed.). 2007. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2011. “The Social Dynamics of Civil War: Insights from Constructivist Theory.” Simons Papers in Security and Development, No. 10. Vancouver: School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2013. “Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits.” In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications, pp. 220–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2009a. “The Politicization of European Identities.” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.), European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.). 2009b. European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Cohen, Dara Kay. 2013. “Female Combatants and the Perpetration of Violence: Wartime Rape in the Sierra Leone Civil War.” World Politics 65 (3): 383–415.CrossRef

Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar

Cooper, Ian. 2006. “The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU.”Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (2): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowles, Maria Green, Caporaso, James A., and Risse, Thomas (eds.). 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Crespy, Amandine. 2010. “‘When ‘Bolkestein’ is Trapped by the French Anti-Liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of EU Multi-Level Politics.”Journal of European Public Policy 17 (8): 1253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CREST. 1998. British Elections Panel Studies. Available at .

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, Richard, and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1969. Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H. 2004. Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H. 2007a. “A Spiral of Euroscepticism: The Media’s Fault?”Acta Politica 42: 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H. 2007b. “The EU as a Public Sphere.” Living Reviews in European Governance. Available at .

De Vreese, Claes, Banducci, Susan, Semetko, Holli, and Boomgaarden, Hajo. 2006. “The News Coverage of the 2004 European Election Campaign in 25 Countries.”European Union Politics 7 (4): 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H., and Boomgaarden, Hajo. 2009. “A European Public Sphere: Media and Public Opinion.” In Salovaara-Moring, Inka (ed.), Manufactoring Europe: Spaces of Democracy, Diversity and Communication. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 117–28.Google Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H., Boomgaarden, Hajo, and Semetko, Holli. 2011. “(In)Direct Framing Effects: The Effects of News Media Framing on Public Support for Turkish Membership in the European Union.”Communication Research 38 (2): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vreese, Claes H., Peter, Jochen, and Semetko, Holli. 2001. “Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Crossnational Comparative Study of Frames in the News.”Political Communication 18: 107–22.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter. 2011. “No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration.” Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 559–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter. 2012. “Politicization of the EU Budget: Conflict and the Constraining Dissensus.”West European Politics 35 (5): 1075–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter, Trenz, Hans Jörg, and Michailidou, Asimina. 2010. Contesting EU Legitimacy: The Prominence, Content, and Justification of Euroscepticism During 2009 EP Election Campaigns. ARENA Working Paper 14. Oslo: Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

De Wilde, Pieter, and Zürn, Michael. 2012. “Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed?”Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (S1): 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delanty, Gerard, and Rumford, Chris. 2005. Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Caiani, Manuela. 2006. “The Europeanization of Public Discourse in Italy: A Top-Down Process?”European Union Politics 7 (1): 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Caiani, Manuela. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Mosca, Lorenzo. 2007. “In Movimiento: ‘Contamination’ in Action and the Italian Global Justice Movement.”Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs 7 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Déloye, Yves, and Bruter, Michael (eds.). 2007. Encyclopaedia of European Elections. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Deutsch, Karl W. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diez Medrano, Juan. 2009. “The Public Sphere and the European Union’s Political Identity.” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.), European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Directorate-General for Communication. 2012. Two Years to Go to the 2014 European Elections. European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 77.4). Analytic Synthesis. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar

Doerr, Nicole. 2008. “Listen Carefully: Democracy Brokers at the European Social Forums.” Dissertation. Florence, Italy: Department of Social and Political Science, European University Institute.

Doerr, Nicole. 2009. “How European Protest Transforms Institutions of the Public Sphere: Discourse and Decision-Making in the European Social Forum Process.” KFG Working Paper Series, September 2009. Berlin: Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG). “The Transformative Power of Europe,” Free University Berlin.Google Scholar

Dolezal, Martin, Hutter, Swen, and Wüest, Bruno. 2012. “Exploring the New Cleavage across Arena and Public Debates: Design and Methods.” In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, et al. (eds.), Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Eder, Klaus. 2000. “Zur Transformation nationalstaatlicher Öffentlichkeit in Europa. Von der Sprachgemeinschaft zur issuespezifischen Kommunikationsgemeinschaft.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 10: 167–84.

Eder, Klaus, and Kantner, Cathleen. 2000. “Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa: Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit.” In Bach, Maurizio (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften: Sonderheft der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 307–31.Google Scholar

Eder, Klaus, and Kantner, Cathleen. 2002. “Interdiskursivität in der europäischen Öffentlichkeit.” Berliner Debatte Initial 13 (5/6): 79–88.

Eder, Klaus, and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2007. “Prerequisites of Transnational Democracy and Mechanisms for Sustaining it: The Case of the European Union.” In Kohler-Koch, Beate and Rittberger, Berthold (eds.), Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 165–81.Google Scholar

Eilders, Christiane, and Voltmer, Katrin. 2003. “Zwischen Deutschland und Europa: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Europäisierung der meinungsführenden deutschen Tageszeitungen.” Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft 51 (2): 250–70.

Elster, Jon (ed.). 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.”Journal of Communication 4 (4): 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erbe, Jessica. 2005. “‘What Do the Papers Say?’ How Press Reviews Link National Media Arenas in Europe.”Javnost – The Public 12 (2): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erbe, Jessica. 2006. “Integration der politischen Öffentlichkeit in Europa durch Vernetzung: Der Fall der grenzüberschreitenden Presseschauen in Deutschland.” In Langenbucher, Wolfgang R. and Latzer, Michael (eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel: Eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erbe, Jessica. 2012. Der europäische Blick: Presseschauen und die Verbindung nationaler Öffentlichkeiten. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksen, Erik O. 2005. “An Emerging European Public Sphere.”European Journal of Social Theory 8 (3): 341–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksen, Erik O. 2007. “Conceptualising European Public Spheres: General, Segmented and Strong Publics.” In Fossum, John E. and Schlesinger, Philip R. (eds.), The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making. Abingdon, UK, and New York: Routledge, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2011. “Spring 2011: Europeans, the European Union and the Crisis.”Standard Eurobarometer 75. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2012. “Public Opinion in the European Union, Spring 2012.”Standard Eurobarometer 77. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2013. “Public Opinion in the European Union: First Results.”Standard Eurobarometer 79. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Parliament. 2011. Europeans and the Crisis: European Parliament Eurobarometer Summary. Brussels: Directorate General for Communications, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit.Google Scholar

Everson, Michelle, and Vos, Ellen (eds.). 2009. Uncertain Risks Regulated. London: Routledge.

Favell, Adrian. 2008. Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Oxford:Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favell, Adrian. 2009. “Immigration, Migration, and Free Movement in the Making of Europe.” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.), European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favell, Adrian, and Guiraudon, Virginie (eds.). 2011. Sociology of the European Union. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Featherstone, Keith, and Radaelli, Claudio (eds.). 2003. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Ferree, Myra M., Gamson, William A., Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rucht, Dieter (eds.). 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Filippov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 2004. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fligstein, Neil. 2008. Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fligstein, Neil, Polyakova, Alina, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2012. “European Integration, Nationalism and European Identity.”Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (51): 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas. 2000. “Subsidiarity and Democratic Deliberation.” In Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and Fossum, John Erik (eds.), Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation?London:Routledge, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas. 2007. “Toward Self-Sustaining Stability? How the Constitutional Treaty Would Enhance Forms of Institutional and National Balance.”Regional and Federal Studies 17 (3): 353–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas. 2009a. “If There is No Common and Unique European Identity, Should We Create One?” In Holtug, Nils, Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, and Laegaard, Sune (eds.), Multiculturalism and Nationalism in a World of Immigration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas. 2009b. “Universal Human Rights as a Shared Political Identity: Impossible? Necessary? Sufficient?”Metaphilosophy 40 (1): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There is a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.”Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (3): 533–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, Kirsten A., and Schneider, Steven M.. (eds.). 2006. Web Campaigning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Fossum, John Erik, and Schlesinger, Philip (eds.). 2007. The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making?London and New York: Routledge.

Franklin, Mark, and Van der Eijk, Cees. 2006. “The Sleeping Giant: Potential for Political Mobilization of Disaffection in Europe.” In Van der Brug, Wouter and Van der Eijk, Cees (eds.), European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Calhoun, Craig (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar

Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.”American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Alexander. 1993. Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen. 1993. “Westeuropäische Integration und die Schwierigkeit der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22 (2): 96–110.

Gerhards, Jürgen. 2000. “Europäisierung von Ökonomie und Politik und die Trägheit der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit.” In Bach, Maurizio (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften: Sonderheft der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen. 2002. “Das Öffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU im Horizont normativer Öffentlichkeitstheorien.” In Kaelble, Hartmut, Kirsch, Martin, and Schmidt-Gernig, Alexander (eds.), Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 135–58.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, and Hans, Silke. 2012. Virtuelle Transnationalisierung: Partizipation der EU-Bürger an einer transnationalen europäischen Öffentlichkeit. Arbeitspapier 27, Berliner Studien zur Soziologie Europas, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, and Lengfeld, Holger. 2013. Wir, ein europäisches Volk? Sozialintegration Europas und die Idee der Gleichheit aller europäischen Bürger. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, and Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 1991. “Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze.” In Müller-Doohm, Stefan and Neumann-Braun, Klaus (eds.), Öffentli-chkeit, Kultur, Massenkommunikation: Beiträge zur Medien- und Kommunikationssoziologie. Oldenburg: BIS, pp. 31–89.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, Offerhaus, Anke, and Roose, Jochen. 2009. “Wer ist verantwortlich? Die Europäische Union, ihre Nationalstaaten und die massenmediale Attribution von Verantwortung für Erfolge und Misserfolge.” In Marcinkowski, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara (eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie: Sonderheft 42 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 529–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rössel, Jörg. 1999. “Zur Transnationalisierung der Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik. Entwicklungen, Ursachen und mögliche Folgen für die europäische Integration.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 28 (5): 325–44.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Jürgen, and Schäfer, Mike S.. 2010. “Is the Internet a Better Public Sphere? Comparing Old and New Media in the USA and Germany.”New Media & Society 12 (1): 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2012. “The Transformative Power of Globalization and the Structure of Political Conflict in Western Europe.” In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, et al. (eds.), Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grande, Edgar, and Pauly, Louis W. (eds.). 2005. Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the 21st Century. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.CrossRef

Grimm, Dieter. 1995. “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”European Law Journal 1 (3): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Emiliano, and Woll, Cornelia. 2011. “The French Debate over the Bolkestein Directive.” Comparative European Politics 9 (3): 344–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Demo-cracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1980 (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Darmstadt and Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996a. “Braucht Europa eine Verfassung? Eine Bemerkung zu Dieter Grimm.” In Habermas, Jürgen, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 185–91.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996b. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Benhabib, Sheila (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996c. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996d. Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1998a. “Does Europe Need a Constitution? Remarks on Dieter Grimm.” In Habermas, Jürgen, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 155–61.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1998b. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2006a. The Divided West. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2006b. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.”Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2006c. Time of Transitions. Cambridge:Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2011. Die Verfassung Europas. Berlin:Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2013. “Demokratie oder Kapitalismus? Vom Elend der nationalstaatlichen Fragmentierung in einer kapitalistisch integrierten Weltgesellschaft.” Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 5: 59–70.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, and Derrida, Jacques. 2003. “February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe.”Constellations 10 (3): 291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Jackie. 2010. “European Social Purpose and Public Service Communication.” In Bee, Christina and Bozzini, Emanuela (eds.), Mapping the European Public Sphere: Institutions, Media and Civil Society. Farnham, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar

Haug, Christoph. 2010. “Public Spheres within Movements: Challenging the (Re)search for a European Public Sphere.” In Teune, Simon (ed.), The Transnational Condition: Protest Dynamics in an Entangled Europe. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar

Hecock, Douglas R. 2006. “Electoral Competition, Globalization, and Subnational Education Spending in Mexico: 1999–2004.”American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 950–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helbling, Marc, Hoeglinger, Dominic, and Wüest, Bruno. 2010. “How Political Parties Frame European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (4): 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helbling, Marc, Hoeglinger, Dominic, and Wüest, Bruno. 2012. “The Impact of Arenas in Debates over Globalization.” In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, et al. (eds.), Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Herman, Edward S., and Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2005. Political System of the European Union. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why the EU Needs (Left-Right) Politics? Policy Reform and Accountability Are Impossible Without It.” Policy Paper No. 19. Paris: Notre Europe.

Hix, Simon. 2008. What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, and Høyland, Bjørn. 2011. The Political System of the European Union. 3rd edn. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hix, Simon, and Marsh, Michael. 2007. “Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliamentary Elections.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höglinger, Dominic. 2011. Struggling with the Intricate Giant: How European integration is Being Politicized in Western Europe. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Zürich.Google Scholar

Holmes, Douglas. 2009. “Experimental Identities (after Maastricht).” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Katzenstein, Peter J. (eds.), European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holznagel, Bernd. 1999. Der spezifische Funktionsauftrag des Zweiten Deutschen Fernsehens (ZDF): Bedeutung, Anforderungen und Unverzichtbarkeit unter Berücksichtigung der Digitalisierung, der europäischen Einigung und der Globalisierung der Informationsgesellschaft, ZDF Schriftenreihe 55. Mainz: Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 1999. “Making of a Polity: The Struggle over European integration.” In Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2005. “Calculation, Community, and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration.”European Union Politics 6 (4): 419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2006. “Europe’s Blues: Theoretical Soul-Searching after the Rejection of a European Constitution.”PS: Politics and Political Science 39 (April): 247–50.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary (eds.). 2007a. “Understanding Euroscepticism.” Special Issue of Acta Politica, Vol. 42. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2007b. “Sources of Euroscepticism.”Acta Politica 42 (2–3): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole J.. 2004. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” In Marks, Gary and Steenbergen, Marco R. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopf, Ted. 2012. Reconstructing the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hovland, Carl. 1959. “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change.” American Psychologist 14: 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovland, Carl, Lumsdaine, Arthur, and Sheffield, Fred. 1949. Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hutter, Swen, and Grande, Edgar. 2012. “Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries, 1970 to 2010.” Paper presented at PoIEU Project Meeting, November 24, Florence, Italy.

Iyengar, Shanto. 2002. Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: From Shopping Malls to the Internet. Paper presented at the Workshop in Mass Media Economics, London. Accessed January 29, 2009. Available at .Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark, and Kinder, Donald. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.”American Political Science Review 76 (4): 848–58.Google Scholar

Jansen, Dorothea. 2002. Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar

Jentges, Erich, Trenz, Hans-Jörg, and Vetters, Regina. 2007. “Von der politischen zur sozialen Konstitutionalisierung Europas: Verfassungsgebung als Katalysator europäischer Vergesellschaftung?” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48 (4): 705–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen. 2003. “Öffentliche politische Kommunikation in der Europäischen Union: Eine hermeneutisch-pragmatistische Perspektive.” In Klein, Ansgar, Koopmans, Ruud, Klein, Ludger, et al. (eds.), Bürgerschaft, Öffentlichkeit und Demokratie in Europa. Opladen:Leske+Budrich, pp. 215–29.Google Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen. 2004. Kein modernes Babel: Kommunikative Voraussetzungen europäischer Öffentlichkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen. 2006. “Die thematische Verschränkung nationaler Öffentlichkeiten in Europa und die Qualität transnationaler politischer Kommunikation.” In Imhof, Kurt, Blum, Roger, Bonfadelli, Heinz, and Jarren, Otfried (eds.), Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen. 2011. “Debating Humanitarian Military Interventions in the European Public Sphere.” RECON Online Working Paper. Oslo: ARENA, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen, Kutter, Amelie, Hildebrandt, Andreas, and Püttcher, Mark. 2011. “How to Get Rid of the Noise in the Corpus: Cleaning Large Samples of Digital Newspaper Texts.” In International Relations Online Working Paper. Stuttgart: Stuttgart University.Google Scholar

Kantner, Cathleen, Kutter, Amelie, and Renfordt, Swantje. 2008. The Perception of the EU as an Emerging Security Actor in Media Debates on Humanitarian and Military Interventions (1990–2006). RECON Online Working Paper, 2008/19. Oslo: ARENA, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. 1976. “International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States.”International Organization 30 (1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerscher, Alena Debora. 2011. Der Beitritt der Türkei zur Europäischen Union. Ein Vergleich der öffentlichen Debatten in Deutschland und Österreich von 1995 bis 2010. University of Munich: Unpublished Masters thesis.Google Scholar

Kevin, Deirdre. 2003. Europe in the Media: A Comparison of Reporting, Representation and Rhetoric in National Media Systems in Europe. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kielmansegg, Peter G. 1996. “Integration und Demokratie.” In Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, pp. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katharina. 2010a. “Die Mehrfachsegmentierung der europäischen Öffentlichkeit.” TranState Working Papers No. 138. Bremen: Sonderforschungsbereich 597 “Staatlichkeit im Wandel.”Google Scholar

Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katharina. 2010b. “Europe for the People? The Europeanization of Public Spheres in the Tabloid Press.” In Tréfás, David and Lucht, Jens (eds.), Europe on Trial: Shortcomings of the EU with Regard to Democracy, Public Sphere, and Identity. Innsbruck: Studienverlag, pp. 44–59.Google Scholar

Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katharina, and Möller, Johanna. 2009. “Nationalisierte Europäisierung: Die Entwicklung der polnischen Medienöffentlichkeit nach 1989.” Jahrbuch Nordost Archiv 18: 101–39.Google Scholar

Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, De Ridder, Jan A., and Rietberg, Ewald M.. 1997. “Reasoning in Economic Discourse: An Application of the Network Approach to the Dutch Press.” In Roberts, Carl W. (ed.), Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 191–207.Google Scholar

Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, and Pennings, Paul. 2001. “Measurement of Party Positions on the Basis of Party Programmes, Media Coverage and Voter Perceptions.” In Laver, Michael (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge, pp. 162–82.Google Scholar

Kohler-Koch, Beate. 2011. “Zivilgesellschaftliche Partizipation: Zugewinn an Demokratie oder Pluralisierung der europaeischen Lobby?” In Kohler-Koch, Beate and Quittkat, Christine (eds.), Die Entzauberung partizipativer Demokratie: Zur Rolle der Zivilgesellschaft bei der Demokratisierung von EU-Governance. Frankfurt and New York: Campus, pp. 241–71.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud. 2007. “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and Losers, Supporters and Opponents in Europeanised Political Debates.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud. 2010. “Winners and Losers, Supporters and Opponents in Europeanized Public Debates.” In Koopmanns, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud, and Erbe, Jessica. 2004. “Towards a European Public Sphere? Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of Europeanized Political Communication.”Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 17 (2): 97–118.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud, Erbe, Jessica, and Meyer, Martin F.. 2010. “The Europeanization of Public Spheres: Comparisons across Issues, Time, and Countries.” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud, and Pfetsch, Barbara. 2006. “Obstacles or Motors of Europeanization? German Media and the Transnationalization of Public Debate.”Communications 31 (2): 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul (eds.). 2010a. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul. 2010b. “Theoretical Framework, Research Design, and Methods.” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud, and Zimmermann, Ann. 2010. “Transnational Political Communication on the Internet: Search Engine Results and Hyperlink Networks.” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1998. “The Transformation of Cleavage Politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture.”European Journal of Political Research 33 (2): 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2012. “Restructuring the National Political Space: The Supply Side of National Electoral Politics.” In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, et al. (eds.), Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Grande, Edgar. 2012. “The Euro-Crisis: A Boost to Politicization of European Integration?” Paper presented at EUDO 2012 Dissemination Conference on The Euro Crisis and the State of European Democracy, Florence, Italy, November 22 and 23.

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen, and Wuest, Bruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Tresch, Anke, and Jochum, Margit. 2010. “Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Collective Political Actors.” In Koopmanns, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeger, Sandra. 2008. “Nothing but Consultation: The Place of Organised Civil Society in EU Policy Making across Policies.” European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) C-08–03. Available at .

Kuhn, Theresa, and Stoeckel, Florian. 2014. “When European Integration Becomes Costly: The Euro Crisis as a Test of Public Support for European Economic Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy.

Kutter, Amelie, and Kantner, Cathleen. 2012. “Corpus-Based Content Analysis: A Method for Investigating News Coverage on War and Intervention.” In International Relations Online Working Paper. Stuttgart: Stuttgart University.Google Scholar

Laffan, Brigid, and O’Mahony, Jane. 2004. Multilevel Governance: Mis-Fit, Politicisation and Europeanisation: The Implementation of the Habitats Directive. OEUE Phase 2, Occasional Paper. Dublin: Dublin European Institute, University College Dublin.Google Scholar

Lang, Sabine. 2012. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lauf, Edmund, and Peter, Jochen. 2004. “EU-Repräsentanten in Fernsehnachrichten: Eine Analyse ihrer Präsenz in 13 EU-Mitglieds-staaten vor der Europawahl 1999.” In Hagen, Lutz M. (ed.), Europäische Union und mediale Öffentlichkeit: Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde zur Rolle der Medien im europäischen Einigungsprozess. Köln: Halem, pp. 162–77.Google Scholar

Leconte, Cécile. 2010. Understanding Euroscepticism. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggewie, Claus. 2004. Die Türkei und Europa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Lemco, Jonathan. 1991. Political Stability in Federal Governments. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Lengfeld, Holger, Schmidt, Sara, and Häuberer, Julia. 2012. Solidarität in der europäischen Fiskalkrise: Sind die EU-Bürger zu finanzieller Unterstützung von hoch verschuldeten EU-Ländern bereit? Erste Ergebnisse aus einer Umfrage in Deutschland und Portugal. Hamburg Reports on Contemporary Societies – HRCS, 5. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar

Liebert, Ulrike (ed.). 2007. “Europe in Contention: Debating the Constitutional Treaty.” Special Issue of Perspectives on European Politics and Society. Vol. 8 (September). London: Routledge.

Linz, Juan J. 1999. “Democracy, Multinationalism and Federalism.” In Merkel, Wolfgang (ed.), Demokratie in Ost und West. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 382–401.Google Scholar

Locher, Birgit. 2007. Trafficking in Women in the European Union: Norms, Advocacy Networks and Policy Change. Wiesbaden. VS Verlag.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1971. “Öffentliche Meinung.” In Luhmann, NiklasPolitische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Madeker, Ellen. 2008. Türkei und europäische Identität: Eine wissenssoziologische Analyse der Debatte um den EU-Beitritt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1998. “State, Market and Regulatory Competition: Lessons for the Integrating World Economy.” In Moravcsik, Andrew (ed.), Centralization or Fragmentation? Europe Facing the Challenges of Deepening, Diversity, and Democracy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, pp. 94–123.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. “Regulatory Legitimacy in the United States and the European Union.” In Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds.), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the US and the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 252–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15: 338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane J., Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Follesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, et al. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.”Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, Gary, and Steenbergen, Marco R. 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict, Themes in European Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, Gregory B. 1982. “Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 76 (3): 538–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marres, Noortje. 2006. “Net-Work Is Format Work: Issue Networks and the Sites of Civil Society Politics.” In Dean, Jodi, Asherson, John, and Lovink, Geert (eds.), Reformatting Politics: Information Technology and Global Civil Society. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Marres, Noortje, and Rogers, Richard. 2005. “Recipe for Tracing the Fate of Issues and their Publics on the Web.” In Latour, Bruno and Weibel, Peter (eds.), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 922–35.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. 1998. “Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions.” In Rosenfeld, Michel and Arato, Andrew (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 115–53.Google Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell E., and Shaw, Donald L.. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.”Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNair, Brian. 2000. Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Meijers, Maurits. 2013. The Euro-Crisis as a Catalyst of the Europeanization of Public Spheres? A Cross-Temporal Study of the Netherlands and Germany. LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion Paper Series, 62, London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Meyer, Christoph O. 1999. “Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit.”Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (4): 617–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Christoph O. 2002. Europäische Öffentlichkeit als Kontrollsphäre: Die Europäische Kommission, die Medien und politische Verantwortlichkeit. Berlin: Vistas.Google Scholar

Meyer, Christoph O. 2007. “The Constitutional Treaty Debates as Revelatory Mechanisms: Insights for Public Sphere Research and Re-Launch Attempts.” RECON Online Working Paper. Oslo: ARENA, University of Oslo.

Meyer, Christoph O. 2009. “Does European Union Politics become Mediatized? The Case of the European Commission.”Journal of European Public Policy 16 (7): 1047–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Jan-Henrik. 2009. “Transnational Communication in the European Public Sphere.” In Kaiser, Wolfram, Leucht, Brigitte, and Rasmussen, Morten (eds.), The History of the European Union: Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950–1972. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 110–28.Google Scholar

Meyer, Jan-Henrik. 2010. The European Public Sphere: Media and Transnational Communication in European Integration, Studies on the History of European Integration. Stuttgart:Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. 1996. “Between Facts and Norms: Jürgen Habermas.”Journal of Philosophy 93: 307–15.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. 2000. “W(h)ither the Constitution?”Cardozo Law Review 21: 1063–83.Google Scholar

Milavsky, J.Ronald, Ronald C.Keppler, HorstStipp, H., and Rubens, William. 1982. “Television and Aggression: Results of a Panel Study.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (3): 701–5.Google Scholar

Minkenberg, Michael, and Perrineau, Pascal. 2007. “The Radical Right in the European Elections 2004.”International Political Science Review 28 (1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Kristen. 1978. “Economic Influences on Presidential Popularity.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (3): 360–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 1994. “Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen.” In Neidhardt, Friedhelm (ed.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen:Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 7–41.Google Scholar

Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 2006. “Europäische Öffentlichkeit als Prozess. Anmerkungen zum Forschungsstand.” In Langenbucher, Wolfgang R. and Latzer, Michael (eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel: Eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive. Wiesbaden: VS Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neidhardt, Friedhelm, Koopmans, Ruud, and Pfetsch, Barbara. 2000. “Konstitutionsbedingungen politischer Öffentlichkeit: Der Fall Europa.” In WZB-Jahrbuch. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, pp. 263–93.Google Scholar

Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance.”American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, Iver. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.”Millennium – Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nome, Martin Austvoll, and Weidmann, Nils B.. 2013. “Conflict Diffusion via Social Identities: Entrepreneurship and Adaptation.” In Checkel, Jeffrey T. (ed.), Transnational Dynamics of Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberhuber, Florian, Bärenreuter, Christoph, Krzyzanowski, Michal, Schönbauer, Heinz, and Wodak, Ruth. 2005. “Debating the European Constitution: On Representations of Europe/the EU in the Press.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 227–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Johan P. 2002. “The Many Faces of Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peter, Jochen, and De Vreese, Claes H.. 2003. “Agenda-Rich, Agenda-Poor: A Cross-National Comparative Investigation of Nominal and Thematic Public Agenda Diversity.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15 (1): 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peter, Jochen, and De Vresse, Claes H.. 2004. “In Search of Europe: A Cross-National Comparative Study of the European Union in National Television News.”The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (3): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Bernhard. 1993. Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philipp. 2001. “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11: 268–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfetsch, Barbara. 2008. “Agents of Transnational Debate across Europe: The Press in Emerging European Public Sphere.”Javnost – The Public 15 (4): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfetsch, Barbara, and Adam, Silke. 2008. “Die Akteursperspektive in der politischen Kommunikationsforschung: Fragestellungen, Forschungs-paradigmen und Problemlagen.” In Pfetsch, Barbara and Adam, Silke (eds.), Massenmedien als politische Akteure: Konzepte und Analysen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfetsch, Barbara, Adam, Silke, and Eschner, Barbara. 2008. “The Contribution of the Press to Europeanization of Public Debates: A Comparative Study of Issue Salience and Conflict Lines of European Integration.”Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 9 (4): 465–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfetsch, Barbara, Adam, Silke, and Eschner, Barbara. 2010. “The Media’s Voice over Europe: Issue Salience, Openness, and Conflict Lines in Editorials.” In Koopmanns, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. 2008a. “Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics.” International Organization 62 (2): 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Richard (ed.). 2008b. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Price, Richard, and Reus-Smit, Christian. 1998. “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism.”European Journal of International Relations 4 (3): 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Puntscher Riekmann, Sonja, and Wydra, Doris. 2013. “Representation in the State of Emergency: Parliaments Against Governments?”Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragin, Charles, and Rihoux, Benoit (eds.). 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. London: Sage Publications.

Rauh, Christian. 2013. “A Widening Audience, Ever More Interested and Active? The Public Politicization of European Integration in the EU6, 1990–2011.” Unpublished manuscript. Berlin: WZB – Social Science Research Center Berlin.

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York:Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1999. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 129–80.Google Scholar

Renfordt, Swantje. 2011. Framing the Use of Force: An International Rule of Law in Media Reporting. A Comparative Analysis of Western Debates about Military Interventions, 1990–2005. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘‘‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in International Relations.”International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Risse, Thomas. 2002. “Zur Debatte um die (Nicht-) Existenz einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit: Was wir wissen, und wie es zu interpretieren ist.” Berliner Debatte Initial 13 (5/6): 15–23.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas. 2013. Solidarität unter Fremden? Europäische Identität im Härtetest. KFG Working Paper Series, 50. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas, Cowles, Maria G., and Caporaso, James A.. 2001. “Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction.” In Cowles, Maria G., Caporaso, James A., and Risse, Thomas (eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War.”International Organization 48 (2): 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, Richard. 2004. Information Politics on the Web. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rokkan, Stein. 1999. State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roskos-Ewoldsen, David, Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly, and Dillman-Carpentier, Francesca. 2002. “Media Priming: A Synthesis.” In Bryant, Jennings and Zillmann, Dolf (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 97–120.Google Scholar

Sanders, David, and Norris, Pippa. 2005. “The Impact of Political Advertising in the UK 2001 Election.”Political Research Quarterly 58: 525–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharkow, Michael, and Vogelgesang, Jens. 2009. “Effects of Domestic Media Use on European Integration.”Communications 34: 73–91.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1985. “Die Politikverflechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26 (4): 324–50.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1988. “The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.”Public Administration 66: 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2009. “Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity.”European Political Science Review 1 (2): 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2010. “The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited.” In Scharpf, Fritz W. (ed.), Community and Autonomy: Institutions, Policies, and Legitimacy in Multilevel Europe. Frankfurt am Main:Campus.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2013. Political Legitimacy in a Non-Optimal Currency Area. KFG Working Paper Series. Berlin: Free University Berlin.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schatz, Edward (ed.). 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Sedelmeier, Ulrich (eds.). 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schmidt, Vivien A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A., and Radaelli, Claudio. 2004. “Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues,” West European Politics 27 (2): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. 2000. How to Democratize the European Union – and Why Bother?London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Schuck, Andreas R.T., and De Vreese, Claes H.. 2006. “Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement.”European Journal of Communication 21 (3): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuck, Andreas R.T., Xezonakis, Georgios, Elenbaas, Matthijs, Banducci, Susan A., and De Vreese, Claes H.. 2011. “Party Contestation and Europe on the News Agenda: The 2009 European Parliamentary Elections.”Electoral Studies 30 (1): 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Scott, John (ed.). 1991. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.

Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Database on the Social Psychology View of Human Nature.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semetko, Holli A., De Vreese, Claes H., and Peter, Jochen. 2000. “Europeanised Politics – Europeanised Media? European Integration and Political Communication.”, West European Politics 23 (4): 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Ian. 1996. Democracy’s Place. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. 2010a. “Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.”Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 411–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. 2010b. Beyond Paradigms: Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statham, Paul. 2010a. “What Kind of Europeanized Public Politics.” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statham, Paul. 2010b. ‘‘Making Europe News: Journalism and Media Performance.” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statham, Paul, Koopmans, Ruud, Tresch, Anke, and Firmstone, Julie. 2010. “Political Party Contestation: Emerging Euroscepticism or Normalisation of Eurocriticism?” In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (eds.), The Making of a European Public Sphere: The Europeanisation of Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 327–65.Google Scholar

Statham, Paul, and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2013a. “How European Union Politicization Can Emerge through Contestation: The Constitution Case.”Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (5): 965–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statham, Paul, and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2013b. The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Steffek, Jens, and Nanz, Patrizia. 2008. “Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance.” In Steffek, Jens, Kissling, Claudia, and Nanz, Patrizia (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steenbergen, Marco. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank (eds.). 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Stoeckel, Florian 2009. “The European Public Sphere, the Media, and Support for European Integration.” Berliner Studien zur Soziologie Europas 20. Berlin: Free University Berlin.Google Scholar

Stoeckel, Florian. 2012. “Becoming Europeans? The Effect of Transnational Interactions on Identification with Europe.” Unpublished paper. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Department of Political Science.

Stretesky, Paul, and Pogrebin, Mark. 2007. “Gang-Related Gun Violence: Socialization, Identity, and Self.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36 (1): 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taggart, Paul, and Szczerbiak, Aleks (eds.). 2005/2008. Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Vols. 1 and 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tarrow, Sidney. 2001. “Contentious Politics in a Composite Polity.” In Imig, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.), Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 233–52.Google Scholar

Thorhallsson, Baldur. 2000. The Role of Small States in the European Union. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Tobler, Stefan. 2010. Transnationalisierung nationaler Öffentlichkeit. Konfliktinduzierte Kommunikationsverdichtungen und kollektive Identitätsbildung in Europa. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2002. Zur Konstitution politischer Öffentlichkeit in der Europäischen Union. Zivilgesellschaftliche Subpolitik oder schaupolitische Inszenierung?Baden-Baden:Nomos.Google Scholar

Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2004. “Media Coverage on European Governance: Exploring the European Public Sphere in National Quality Newspapers.” European Journal of Communication 19 (3): 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2005. Europa in den Medien: Die europäische Integration im Spiegel nationaler Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main:Campus.Google Scholar

Trenz, Hans Jörg. 2007. “‘Quo Vadis Europe?’ Quality Newspapers Struggling for European Unity.” In Fossum, John Erik and Schlesinger, Philip (eds.), The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making?London and New York: Routledge, pp. 89–109.Google Scholar

Trenz, Hans Jörg. 2008. “In Search of the European Public Sphere: Between Normative Overstretch and Empirical Disenchantment.” RECON Online Working Papers. Oslo: ARENA, University of Oslo.

Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2010. “The Europeanisation of Political Communication: Conceptional Clarifications and Empirical Measurement.” In Bee, Christina and Bozzini, Emanuela (eds.), Mapping the European Public Sphere: Institutions, Media and Civil Society. Farnham, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2000. “An Analysis of the Dutch and Spanish Newspaper Debates on EU Enlargement with Central and Eastern European Countries: Suggestions for a Transnational Public Sphere.” In Baerns, Barbara and Raupp, Juliana (eds.), Information und Kommunikation in Europa. Berlin: Vistas, pp. 61–87.Google Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2003. “Bedingungen für die Entstehung von Öffentlichkeit in der EU.” In Klein, Ansgar, Koopmanns, Ruud, Trenz, Hans-Jörg, et al. (eds.), Bürgerschaft, Öffentlichkeit und Demokratie in Europa. Opladen:Leske+Budrich, pp. 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2005. “The Public Sphere in the European Union: A Media Analysis of Public Discourse on EU Enlargement and on the Haider Case.” PhD dissertation, Florence, Italy: European University Institute, Department of Social and Political Sciences.

Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2006. “Does a Public Sphere Exist in the European Union? An Analysis of the Content of the Debate on the Haider Case.”European Journal of Political Research 45 (4): 609–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2010. “Theoretical Reflections on the Public Sphere in the European Union: A Network of Communication or a Political Community?” In Bee, Christina and Bozzini, Emanuela (eds.), Mapping the European Public Sphere: Institutions, Media and Civil Society. Farnham, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne, Rauer, Valentin, Rivet, Sylvain, and Risse, Thomas. 2003. “The EU as a Political Community: A Media Analysis of the ‘Haider Debate’ in the European Union.” In Annual Meeting of the European Union Studies Association (EUSA), Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Van de Steeg, Marianne, and Risse, Thomas. 2010. “The Emergence of a European Community of Communication: Insights from Empirical Research on the Europeanization of Public Spheres.” KFG Working Paper Series 15, Free University Berlin.Google Scholar

Van der Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark. 1996. Choosing Europe. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venables, John. 2005. Making Headlines: News Values and Risk Signals in Journalism. Huntingdon, UK: ELM Publications.Google Scholar

Vetters, Regina. 2007. “Vor Ort in Europa: Ein Vergleich der EU-Berichterstattung deutscher Qualitäts- und Regionalzeitungen.” Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 3: 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigil, James Diego. 2003. “Urban Violence and Street Gangs.”Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vliegenthart, Jens, Schuck, Andreas R., Boomgaarden, Hajo G., and De Vreese, Claes H.. 2008. “News Coverage and Support for European Integration 1990–2006.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20 (4): 415–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warleigh, Alex. 2003. “Informal Governance: Improving EU Democracy?” In Christensen, Thomas and Piattoni, Simona (eds.), Informal Governance in the European Union. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 22–35.Google Scholar

Weale, Albert. 1999. Democracy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weßels, Bernhard. 2007. “Discontent and European Identity: Three Types of Euroscepticism.”Acta Politica 42: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wessels, Wolfgang, Maurer, Andreas, and Mittag, Jürgen (eds.). 2003. Fifteen into One? The European Union and its Member States. Manchester, UK, and New York: Manchester University Press.CrossRef

Wessler, Hartmut, Peters, Bernhard, Brüggemann, Michael, von Königslow, Katharina Kleinen, and Sifft, Stefanie. 2008. Transnationalization of Public Spheres, Transformations of the State. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Iain. 2011. “What Should We Expect of ‘Erasmus Generations’?”Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 1113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wimmel, Andreas. 2006. Transnationale Diskurse in Europa: Der Streit um den Türkei-Beitritt in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Winslow, Donna. 1999. “Rites of Passage and Group Bonding in the Canadian Airborne.”Armed Forces & Society 25 (3): 429–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittmer, Dennis. 1992. “Ethical Sensitivities and Managerial Decision-Making: An Experiment.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2 (4): 443–62.Google Scholar

Woelke, Jens, Steininger, Christian, and Maurer, Torsten. 2010. “Zur Realität europäischer Öffentlichkeit: Die Darstellung der EU in Informationssendungen des deutschen und österreichischen Fernsehens.” In Pöttker, Horst and Schwarzenegger, Christian (eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und journalistische Verantwortung: Journalismus International. Köln: Halem, pp. 40–75.Google Scholar

Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2008. “The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks.”Annual Review of Political Science 11: 539–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2010. “Sexual Violence during War: Variation and Accountability.” In Smeulers, Alette and van Sliedregt, Elies (eds.), Criminal Justice: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Antwerp, the Netherlands: Intersentia Publishers.Google Scholar

Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zippel, Kathrin. 2006. The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats: Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2014. “The Politicization of World Politics and its Effects: Eight Propositions.”European Political Science Review 6 (1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2013. “Globalization and Global Governance.” In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications, pp. 401–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias (eds.). 2013. Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik: Umkämpfte Internationale Institutionen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.