The European Art Market and the First World War Art, Capital, and the Decline of the Collecting Class, 1910–1925
Book contents
- The European Art Market and the First World War
- Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare
- The European Art Market and the First World War
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The European Market before 1914
- 2 The Great Conflagration (1914–1918)
- 3 ‘Wartime Cultural Changes’ (1914–1918)
- 4 Postwar Markets (1918–1925)
- 5 ‘The Challenges of New Markets’
- 6 Cementing Nationalisation (1918–1925)
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 April 2025
Book contents
- The European Art Market and the First World War
- Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare
- The European Art Market and the First World War
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The European Market before 1914
- 2 The Great Conflagration (1914–1918)
- 3 ‘Wartime Cultural Changes’ (1914–1918)
- 4 Postwar Markets (1918–1925)
- 5 ‘The Challenges of New Markets’
- 6 Cementing Nationalisation (1918–1925)
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The European Art Market and the First World WarArt, Capital, and the Decline of the Collecting Class, 1910–1925, pp. 241 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Primary Sources
Dommages de guerre de la Première Guerre mondiale Généralités Enregistrement des dommages, ‘Dossiers individuels présentés devant les commissions d’évaluation parisiennes (1914–1935)’, D2R7 1 à 283, p. 39, Archives de Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
Dossiers individuels des dommages (1914–1946), Guerre 1914–1918. ‘Dommages de guerre’, F 21 3968.2, Archives Nationales de France, Paris.Google Scholar
Seligmann to Millerand, 31 May 1920 and Seligmann to Brousse, 8 and 9 July 1920, F21 3987, Archives Nationales, Paris.Google Scholar
Tagebuch 1913–1915, ‘Fondo Pollak’, Archivio Baracco, xviii, Museo Baracco, Rome.Google Scholar
Lettera n. 29407, Carteggio Ricci, vol. CLVII, Biblioteca Classense, Ravenna.Google Scholar
Série d’ inventaires, Fonds d’ archives relatifs aux réfugiés Belges aux Pays-Bas durant la Première Guerre Mondiale 1914–1922, Archives de l’État en Belgique, T 553/02.Google Scholar
Archives de la Ville des Bruxelles, Archief van de Stad Brussel, AVB-SAB, 1–15.Google Scholar
Catalogue de ventes publiques, Archives de la Ville des Bruxelles, Archief van de Stad Brussel, AVB-SAB, 56–70.Google Scholar
Letter of Hugo Helbing Kunsthandlung und Kunstantiquariat München to Leopold Andrian 27 October 1925, HS 1978 002 01043, Literaturarchiv Marbach.Google Scholar
Letter of Rudolf Lepke to E. Glaser and P. Ernst, 30 June 1919, 61.2416.38, Literaturarchiv Marbach, Marbach.Google Scholar
Bill to augment the income and funds of the National Gallery and facilitate the acquisition of certain pictures in Great Britain earmarked by the Board of the National Gallery, 22 March 1920, ‘Export of Works of Art and Antiquities’, AA 66 77/1, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Criticism of the Luxury Duty. Memorandum by Reade, October 1918, Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers, CUST 118, 211, 3, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
‘Export of Works of art: ‘Paramount List’ policy’, T218/8, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Joint Note to Chancellor, 26 January 1926, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, 10, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter of Lord Lansdowne from the National Gallery to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 8 July 1922, ‘Export of Works of art: ‘Paramount List’ policy’, T218/8, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter of Sir William H. Davison to Sir Robert Horne, ‘Export of Duty Sales on Works of Art’, 20 January 1922, CUST 118/53, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Luxury Duty: Hotel and Restaurant Bills Tax, Memorandum by the Boards of Customs and Excise, Appendix II, Luxury Duties in other Countries, March 1922, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Luxury Taxation, Note by Intelligence Branch, 12 October 1925, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, 7, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
‘Proposed imposition of export duty on works of art declared to be of national, scientific, historic or artistic interest within the meaning of s20 Finance Act 1896 and s63 Finance Act 1910’, IR 62/866, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Proposed Export Duty Report of the Committee on the Export of Works of Arts etc. Presented to the Rt. Hon, R.A. Butler M. P, Chancellor of the Exchequer, ‘Export of Works of Art and Antiquities’AA66 77/1, 1950, The National Archives.Google Scholar
Report, 8 February 1922, ‘French Legislation as to Works of Art’, CUST 118 53, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
The Luxury Duty proposed in 1918, Custom House, 16. April 1923, Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers, CUST 118, 211, 3, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter from Douwe Komter to André Frappart, 11 April 1904, RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History, The Hague, Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Boekkkondkundige Stukke, Inv. 1–3, no. 1 (91).Google Scholar
Letter of Max Dittmar Henkel to his mother, 11 March 1915, Brieven een Briefkarten van M.D. Henkel aan Johanna Henkel Rijksmuseum Archief 6–7 M.D Henkel, Inv. Nr. 30–36, 36, Rijksmuseum Archive, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Letter of Max Dittmar Henkel to his mother, 29 June 1916, Brieven een Briefkarten van M.D. Henkel aan Johanna Henkel Rijksmuseum Archief 6–7 M.D Henkel, Inv. Nr. 37–46, Nr. 37–46, 37, Rijksmuseum Archive, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Certificates signed by Cornelis Hofsteede de Groot for Komter’s dealership (1919–1922), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1911–1930, 23–41, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of Douwe Komter to Burchard (24 December 1924), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1924–1926, 24–31, 25, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of Karl With to Douwe Komter (5 February 1925), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1911–1930, 23–41, 23, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Oorlogswinstbelasting, Aanslagbiljet aan den Herr D. Komter, Ingekomen Aanslagbiljet van de belastingdienst 1923–1925, Inv Nr. 10, Archief Douwe Komter, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Report of Hofstede de Groot for Joseph Cremer, Dortmund (1915), Collectie brieven, handschriften en kleine archieven (006), inv. 3. 620–677, 656, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of James Simon to Wilhelm von Bode, 2 October 1904, ‘Bode Legacy’ 4626 ZA/SMB-PK, Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin.Google Scholar
Letters between Colin Agnew and Wilhelm Bode on the Berlin branch, ‘Thos Agnew and Sons 1891–1928’ [6148/1–3], Zentralarchiv der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Dommages de guerre de la Première Guerre mondiale Généralités Enregistrement des dommages, ‘Dossiers individuels présentés devant les commissions d’évaluation parisiennes (1914–1935)’, D2R7 1 à 283, p. 39, Archives de Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
Dossiers individuels des dommages (1914–1946), Guerre 1914–1918. ‘Dommages de guerre’, F 21 3968.2, Archives Nationales de France, Paris.Google Scholar
Seligmann to Millerand, 31 May 1920 and Seligmann to Brousse, 8 and 9 July 1920, F21 3987, Archives Nationales, Paris.Google Scholar
Tagebuch 1913–1915, ‘Fondo Pollak’, Archivio Baracco, xviii, Museo Baracco, Rome.Google Scholar
Lettera n. 29407, Carteggio Ricci, vol. CLVII, Biblioteca Classense, Ravenna.Google Scholar
Série d’ inventaires, Fonds d’ archives relatifs aux réfugiés Belges aux Pays-Bas durant la Première Guerre Mondiale 1914–1922, Archives de l’État en Belgique, T 553/02.Google Scholar
Archives de la Ville des Bruxelles, Archief van de Stad Brussel, AVB-SAB, 1–15.Google Scholar
Catalogue de ventes publiques, Archives de la Ville des Bruxelles, Archief van de Stad Brussel, AVB-SAB, 56–70.Google Scholar
Letter of Hugo Helbing Kunsthandlung und Kunstantiquariat München to Leopold Andrian 27 October 1925, HS 1978 002 01043, Literaturarchiv Marbach.Google Scholar
Letter of Rudolf Lepke to E. Glaser and P. Ernst, 30 June 1919, 61.2416.38, Literaturarchiv Marbach, Marbach.Google Scholar
Bill to augment the income and funds of the National Gallery and facilitate the acquisition of certain pictures in Great Britain earmarked by the Board of the National Gallery, 22 March 1920, ‘Export of Works of Art and Antiquities’, AA 66 77/1, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Criticism of the Luxury Duty. Memorandum by Reade, October 1918, Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers, CUST 118, 211, 3, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
‘Export of Works of art: ‘Paramount List’ policy’, T218/8, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Joint Note to Chancellor, 26 January 1926, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, 10, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter of Lord Lansdowne from the National Gallery to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 8 July 1922, ‘Export of Works of art: ‘Paramount List’ policy’, T218/8, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter of Sir William H. Davison to Sir Robert Horne, ‘Export of Duty Sales on Works of Art’, 20 January 1922, CUST 118/53, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Luxury Duty: Hotel and Restaurant Bills Tax, Memorandum by the Boards of Customs and Excise, Appendix II, Luxury Duties in other Countries, March 1922, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Luxury Taxation, Note by Intelligence Branch, 12 October 1925, ‘Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers’, CUST 118, 211, 7, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
‘Proposed imposition of export duty on works of art declared to be of national, scientific, historic or artistic interest within the meaning of s20 Finance Act 1896 and s63 Finance Act 1910’, IR 62/866, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Proposed Export Duty Report of the Committee on the Export of Works of Arts etc. Presented to the Rt. Hon, R.A. Butler M. P, Chancellor of the Exchequer, ‘Export of Works of Art and Antiquities’AA66 77/1, 1950, The National Archives.Google Scholar
Report, 8 February 1922, ‘French Legislation as to Works of Art’, CUST 118 53, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
The Luxury Duty proposed in 1918, Custom House, 16. April 1923, Board of Customs and Excise and predecessor: Private Office Papers, CUST 118, 211, 3, The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Letter from Douwe Komter to André Frappart, 11 April 1904, RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History, The Hague, Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Boekkkondkundige Stukke, Inv. 1–3, no. 1 (91).Google Scholar
Letter of Max Dittmar Henkel to his mother, 11 March 1915, Brieven een Briefkarten van M.D. Henkel aan Johanna Henkel Rijksmuseum Archief 6–7 M.D Henkel, Inv. Nr. 30–36, 36, Rijksmuseum Archive, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Letter of Max Dittmar Henkel to his mother, 29 June 1916, Brieven een Briefkarten van M.D. Henkel aan Johanna Henkel Rijksmuseum Archief 6–7 M.D Henkel, Inv. Nr. 37–46, Nr. 37–46, 37, Rijksmuseum Archive, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Certificates signed by Cornelis Hofsteede de Groot for Komter’s dealership (1919–1922), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1911–1930, 23–41, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of Douwe Komter to Burchard (24 December 1924), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1924–1926, 24–31, 25, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of Karl With to Douwe Komter (5 February 1925), Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Binnenkommende Korrespondentie, 1911–1930, 23–41, 23, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Oorlogswinstbelasting, Aanslagbiljet aan den Herr D. Komter, Ingekomen Aanslagbiljet van de belastingdienst 1923–1925, Inv Nr. 10, Archief Douwe Komter, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Report of Hofstede de Groot for Joseph Cremer, Dortmund (1915), Collectie brieven, handschriften en kleine archieven (006), inv. 3. 620–677, 656, RKD – Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Letter of James Simon to Wilhelm von Bode, 2 October 1904, ‘Bode Legacy’ 4626 ZA/SMB-PK, Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin.Google Scholar
Letters between Colin Agnew and Wilhelm Bode on the Berlin branch, ‘Thos Agnew and Sons 1891–1928’ [6148/1–3], Zentralarchiv der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Anonymous, ‘Abschied vom Genfer Altar’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 32: 42 (1920), 816.Google Scholar
Advert for Jacques Seligmann’s dealership, New York Herald (28 December 1917), p. 4.Google Scholar
Advert for Jacques Seligmann’s dealership, New York Herald (17 March 1918), p. 9.Google Scholar
Advert for Jacques Seligmann’s dealership, The New York Times (30 December 1917), p. 73.Google Scholar
Amsler & Ruthhardt (eds), Sammlungen Oscar von zur Mühlen, St. Petersburg. Graf Gregor Stroganoff, Rom. Dr. Ottokar Mascha, Wien (29 May 1914) (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Annuaire de la curiosité et des beaux-arts. Paris-Départements- Étranger 4 (Paris: Lib. Imp. Réunies, 1914).Google Scholar
Annuaire de la curiosité et des beaux-arts. Paris-Départements- Étranger 10 (Paris: Lib. Imp. Réunies, 1920).Google Scholar
‘Annuaire des ventes de tableaux, dessins, miniatures’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 30: 11 (1921).Google Scholar
Annuaire du Commerce Didot-Bottin Paris, 117: 2 (1914).Google Scholar
Ball, H., and Graupe, P. (eds). Die Sammlung C. Castiglioni, Wien, Handkatalog (28/29 November 1930) (Berlin, 1930).Google Scholar
Basily-Callimaki, E. J.-B. Isabey: Sa Vie, Son Temps, 1767–1855, Suivi Du Catalogue De L’ oeuvre Gravée Par Et D’après Isabey (Paris: Frazier-Soye, 1909).Google Scholar
Benjamin, R. Paris, sa faune et ses moeurs. L’Hôtel des Ventes. Dessins de Jean Lefort (Paris: Odin, 1914).Google Scholar
Berenson, B. North Italian Painters of the Renaissance (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1907).Google Scholar
‘Bilanz des Berliner Kunstmarktes im verflossenen Winter’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 35: 12 (1925), 43.Google Scholar
Bode, W. ‘Die Kunstraubgelüste unserer Feinde’, Kunstmarkt und Kunstchronik 17 (1919), 337–340.Google Scholar
‘Boni de Cas tellane dies in Paris at 64’, The New York Times (20 October 1932).Google Scholar
‘Bulletin de la Chambre syndicale des négociants en objets d’art, tableaux et curiosités’ 17: 58 (1917).Google Scholar
Bunin, I. Cursed Days: A Diary of Revolution, translated by Thomas Gaiton Marullo (Chicago: Ivan Dee Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Carter, R. C. A. The Year’s Art. A concise Epitome of All Matters relating to the Arts of Painting, sculpture, engraving and architecture and to schools of design which have occurred during the year 1914 together with information respecting the events of the year 1915 (London: J&S Virture & Co., 1915).Google Scholar
Cassirer, K. P. and Helbing, Hugo (eds), Sammlung Schmeil, Dresden: Versteigerung 17. Oktober 1916 in der Galerie Paul Cassirer, Berlin (17 October 1916) (Berlin, 1916).Google Scholar
Cassirer, K. P. and Helbing, Hugo (eds), Die Sammlung Richard von Kaufmann, Berlin: Ausstellung 25 November bis 2 Dezember 1917; Versteigerung, 4 Dezember 1917 und die folgenden Tage in den Versteigerungsräumen Berlin (Munich, 1917).Google Scholar
Catalogue of Modern Pictures Given by Dutch Artists, to be Sold for the Benefit of St. David’s Home for Totally Disabled Sailors and Soldiers, Castlebar Hill, Ealind Also Ancient and Modern Pictures and Drawings, the Property of Athol Thorne (London, 1923).Google Scholar
‘Chambre syndicale des Négociants en tableaux et objets d’art anciens’ La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 28: 9 (1919).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson and Woods Ltd. (ed.), Catalogue of Pictures and Drawings. The Property of Isaac Falcke, Esq. Deceased, late of 104, Gower Street, W. C. sold by order of the Executors (London, 1910).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), The Remaining Works of Edward John Gregory, R.A. P.R.I. Deceased, late of 8, Grenville Place, Maida Vale, N.W. sold by order of the Executrices (London, 1910).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. (ed.), The collection of engravings formed by Abel. Buckley, Esq. Deceased, late of Ryecroft Hall, Audenshaw (London, 1910).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. (ed.), The collections of Engravings of the Early English School, formed by Daniel Meinertzhagen, Esq. Deceased, late of Brockwood Park and 26, Rutland Gate, S.W. (London, 1910).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. Catalogue of Old Pictures, The Property of a Gentleman. The Property of Alphonse Simkens and Pictures from numerous Private Collections and different sources (22 July 1920) (London, 1910).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Pictures of Old Masters. The Property of George Wilder, Esq. of Stansted Park, Sussex. Ancient and Modern pictures. The property of Sir William Agnew, bart. Deceased, late of 11 Great Stanhope Street, important pictures. The property of Norman Forbes Robertson Esq. who has given up his residence, 42 Bedford Square, W. C. (19 May 1911) (London, 1911).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Mezzotint portraits after Reynolds, formed by Walter Behrens, Esq. Deceased, late of Fallowfield near Manchester (9 June 1913) (London, 1913).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Pictures and Drawings H. M. W. Oppenheim, Esq, Deceased, late of 16 Bruton Street (13 June 1913) (London, 1913).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson and Woods Ltd. (ed.), Catalogue of the collection of highly important pictures. Chiefly of the Barbizon School of the late Archibald Coats, Esq. of Woodside, Paisley (7 March 1914) (London, 1914).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), The collection of engravings formed by Abel. Buckley, Esq. Deceased, late of Ryecroft Hall, Audenshaw, 30.5.1910. A catalogue of the Fine and Extensive Collection of Engraved Portraits after Sir Joshua Reynolds and Engravings by Bartolozzi and others of his school. Formed during the first half of the 19th century by John, Lord Northwick. Now sold by order of Trustees ad with Consent of the Court (22 June 1914) (London, 1914).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Water Colour Drawings. The Property of R. J. Ward, Esq. Deceased, late of 7 Lindum Terrace, Lincoln (30 April 1915) (London, 1915).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Catalogue of the Collection of important Pictures by old Masters of Charles. T. D. Crews, Esq. D.L.J.P., F.S.A. Deceased, late of 41 Portman Square and Billingbear Park, Berks (2 July 1915) (London, 1915).Google Scholar
Christie, Mandon &Woods Ltd. Major Sir Arthur J. Campbell-Orde sells for the benefit of the British and Russian prisoners of war (23 February 1916) (London 1916).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), Catalogue of Modern Etchings by A. Legros, James McBey, A. Zorn and Others. The Property of Madame Blanche Marchesi of 16 Grenville Place, Kilburn Priory, N.W. Engravings after J. M. W. Turner, R. A. The Property of W. G. Rawlison, Esq. of Hill Lodge Hillsleigh Road, Campden Hill, W._Modern Etchings and Engravings and Engravings of the Early English School from Various Schools (28 March 1916) (London, 1916).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. (ed.), Catalogue of choice pictures & drawings the property of Mrs. Golding Palmer. Deceased, late of 36 Queen’s Gate, S.W. (18 July 1916) (London, 1916).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson &Woods Ltd. (ed.), The collections of Engravings of the Early English School, formed by Daniel Meinertzhagen, Esq. Deceased, late of Brockwood Park and 26, Rutland Gate, S.W (12 July 1910) (London, 1917).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods, Works of art presented to the British Red Cross Society and the Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem in England (8–13 April, 15–20 April, 22–25 April) (London, 1918).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. Catalogue of Early English Engravings and Sporting Prints, the Property of Comte Du Monceau of Brussels, Also Early English and Original Modern Etchings, the Property of Peter Williams and from Other Sources (20 July 1920) (London, 1920).Google Scholar
Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd. Catalogue of Ancient and Modern Pictures. The Property of Her Imperial Majesty the late Empress Eugénie. Sold by Order of Her Imperial Majesty Prince Napoleon Victor. Also ancient and Modern Pictures and Drawings from Various Sources (27 January 1922) (London, 1922).Google Scholar
‘Chronique des ventes. La vente Willems n’a pas lieu. Une première consequence de l’interdiction de sortie des oeuvres d’art’, La Gazette de l’ Hôtel Drouot 29: 55 (1920).Google Scholar
‘Circulaire relative aux conditions du fonctionnement du séquestres des maisons allemandes, autrichiennes et hongroises’, Journal Officiel de la République Française 46: 303 (1914), 8541–8542.Google Scholar
Clemen, P. Der Zustand der Kunstdenkmäler auf dem westlichen Kriegsschauplatz (Leipzig: E.A Seemann, 1916).Google Scholar
‘Coal Industry Commission Bill’, 24 February 1919, Hansard (HC), vol 112, c. 1521–1522 [https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1919/feb/24/coal-industry-commission-bill#S5CV0112P0_19190224_HOC_415, accessed 8 September 2020].Google Scholar
Collection Eugène Broerman, Catalogue, Galerie Chapellier, 27–28 April 1926, Catalogue de ventes publiques Archives de la Ville des Bruxelles, Archief van de Stad Brussel, AVB-SAB, 1–15.Google Scholar
‘Côntrole à exercer par l’administration des domaines dur les operations des séquestres de biens de sujets allemands, autrichiens ou hongrois’, Journal Officiel de la République Française 46: 338 (1914), 9063–9065.Google Scholar
Craffonara, A. ‘…Porta il tuo salvadanaio perchè papa ritorni presto vincitore’, Sottoscrizione Prestito Nazionale 1917, Consolidato 5%, Banca di Roma, 68 × 198 cm, Biblioteca di Storia Moderna e Contemporanea, Roma, Man. C.6, 4928.Google Scholar
‘Current Sales of Old and Modern Pictures – Accessions at Metropolitan Museum’, New York Tribune (15 April 1919), p. 15.Google Scholar
Dayot, A. ‘Comment récupérer les oeuvres d’art volées par les Allemands’, Paris-Midi (7 August 1917).Google Scholar
‘Death of M. Seligmann’, The Times (1 November 1923), p. 13.Google Scholar
‘Décret du 1 Mai relative à l’expoortation des oeuvres d’art. Décret du 1 Mai relative à l’exportation des oeuvres d’art’, Journal Officiel de la République Francaise (2 May 1920), 6554–6555.Google Scholar
Degner, A. ‘Über die Kunst im neuen Staat’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 30: 8 (1918), 149–150.Google Scholar
Der Kunstmarkt. Wochenschrift für Kenner und Sammler. Beiblatt der Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst, ed. E. A Seemann (Leipzig 9 October 1903–8 September 1918).Google Scholar
Der Kunstmarkt 12: 12 (1914), p. 45.Google Scholar
Der Kunstmarkt 12: 19 (1915), p. 73.Google Scholar
‘Die Graphikauktionen in Leipzig und Berlin’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 36 (1922), 606.Google Scholar
‘Die Kunstraubgelüste unserer Feinde’, Kunstmarkt und Kunstchronik 17 (1919), 337–340.Google Scholar
‘Die Versteigerung der Sammlung Richard von Kaufmann’, Berliner Tageblatt 46: 620 (1917), 2.Google Scholar
‘Die Zukunft des deutschen Kunsthandels’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 31: 5 (1919), 96–97.Google Scholar
D. E., ‘Un achat et une donation’, Bulletin de l’ art ancien et modern 593 (1913), 217.Google Scholar
Documents Parlementaires, Sénat, Annexe N. 370, Session ordinaire, Séance du 25 Juilliet 1920, p. 729 [available at www.senat.fr/comptes-rendus-seances/3eme/pdf/documents_parlementaires/1920/DP1920_0726_0832.pdf, accessed 25 March 2020].Google Scholar
Drey, P. Der Kunstmarkt. Eine Studie über die wirtschaftliche Verwertung des Bildes (Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta, 1910).Google Scholar
Drouot, H. (ed.) Catalogue des tableaux modernes composant la collection de M. le Dr. Charles Abadie (17 April 1913, Paris) (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar
Drouot, H. (ed.) Catalogue des tableaux des écoles italienne, allemande, flamande, française et hollandaise et des sculptures provenant de la galerie Crespi de Milan (6 June 1914) (Paris, Drouot).Google Scholar
Drouot, H. (ed.) Collection de Feu M. Guyotin. Catalogue des Tableaux Modernes- Pastels, Aquarelles, Dessins. Vente par suite de décès, Paris (16 February 1918) (Paris, 1918).Google Scholar
Drouot, H. and Manzi-Joyant, G. (eds) Collection Henri Rouart. Tableaux Anciens et Modernes composant la collection de feu M. Henri Rouart (19–20 April 1913) (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar
‘Ein Angriff auf die deutschen Kunstschätze’, Hamburger Fremdenbett 189 (12 April 1919).Google Scholar
‘Ergebnis der Versteigerung Davidsohn’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 33: 34 (1920), 649–651.Google Scholar
Extract from House of Commons Debates, Sir Philip Sas soon (29 May 1922), 1786–1876, quoted from ‘Export of Works of Art: “Paramount List” Policy’, T218/8, The NationaL Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
Frankau, J. Eighteenth-century Colour Prints: An Essay on Certain Stipple Engravers & Their Work in Colour (London and New York: Macmillan, 1906).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Il y a un an. L’Hôtel Drouot pendant la guerre’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 24: 56 (1915).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Il y a un an. L’Hôtel Drouot pendant la guerre’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot year 24: 56 (1915).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Les Prix des Objets d’art et la Guerre. Les Cours n’ont subi aucun fléchissement’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 24: 25 (1915).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Le Prix des Oeuvres d’art et la guerre. Les raisons de la bonne tenue des cours’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 25: 29 (1916).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Resumé des Ventes du 1er Janvier au 15 Juilliet’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 25: 63 (1916).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘A propos des ventes de fin d’année’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 26: 2 (1917).Google Scholar
Frappart, A. ‘Les Effets de la loi sur les Interdictions d’Exportations’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 30: 112 (1921).Google Scholar
Frohlich-Bume, L. ‘Der Kunsthandel zwischen 1917 und 1933’, Du: kulturelle Monatsschrift 19: 10 (1959), 62.Google Scholar
G. ‘Die Versteigerung der Sammlung Vincent Mayer’, Freiburg bei Cassirer in Berlin, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 31 : 4 (1919), 71–72.Google Scholar
‘Gesetz über Ausfuhr von Kunstwerken, vom 21 Dezember 1929’, Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 53 (1927), 485.Google Scholar
Gimpel, R. Diary of an Art Dealer, translated by J. Rosenberg [London, 1966] (London: Trafalgar Square, 1992).Google Scholar
Glaser, C. ‘Die Auktion Schmeil bei Paul Cassirer in Berlin’, Der Kunstmarkt 14: 5 (1916), 20–23.Google Scholar
Glaser, C. ‘Die Neuorganisation des Berliner Ausstellungswesens’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 30: 10 (1918), 193–199.Google Scholar
Glaser, C. ‘Die Versteigerung von Porzellanen und Waffen aus den staatlichen Sammlungen in Dresden bei Lepke in Berlin’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 31: 4 (1919), 72–75.Google Scholar
Glaser, C. ‘Ein Besuch im Louvre’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 12 (1922), 219–221.Google Scholar
Glaser, C. ‘Nekrologe, Paul Cassirer’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 42/43: 23 (1926), 655–656.Google Scholar
G. N. P. Reviewed Work: ‘Victoria and Albert Museum, Review of the Principal Acquisitions, 1914’, The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs 28: 151 (1915), 34–35.Google Scholar
‘Graphik-Auktion bei Paul Graupe, Berlin, vom 6. bis 9 Juni’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 39/40 (1923), 711–713.Google Scholar
Hautecoeur, L. ‘Ferdinand Hodler (1853–1918)’, La Gazette des beaux-arts: la doyenne des Revues d’Art 14: 2 (1918), 385–400.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J., and Falck, C. ‘Der Kettenhandel als Kriegserscheinung’, Beiträge zur Kriegswirtschaft. Herausgegeben von der Volkswirtschaftlichen Abteilung des Kriegsernährungsamtes 3 (Berlin: Verlag der Beiträge zur Kriegswirtschaft, 1916).Google Scholar
‘Honor for Seligmann’s Son. Art Dealer’s Kin Wins Fame on French Battlefield’, The Sun (New York) (7 August 1915).Google Scholar
Huffel, G. N. ‘Een woord vooraf’, Veilingskroniek. Weekblad. Gewijd aan de Belangen van Kunsthandel, Kunstmarkt en Tentoonstellingen 1: 1 (1917), 1.Google Scholar
Hugo, Helbing (ed.), Gemäldesammlung Professor Albert Schmidt, München; ferner Gemälde aus den Nachlässen Prof. Franz Skarbina, Berlin, Kunstmaler F. Pernat, München (18 October 1913) (Munich, 1913).Google Scholar
‘In der viertägigen Antiquitäten- und Kunstgewerbe Versteigerung’, Berliner Börsen Zeitung 63: 113 (8 March 1918).Google Scholar
Jamot, P. ‘Degas’, La Gazette des beaux-arts: la doyenne des Revues dAart 4: 14 (1918), 123–166.Google Scholar
Jonas, E. ‘Le Privilège des commissaire-priseurs’, La Curiosité. Organe de la Chambre Syndicale de la Curiosité et des Beaux-Arts 62: 18 (1919), 2–3.Google Scholar
Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre, 14 Decembre 1921, 5089–5093.Google Scholar
Kalisch, L. ‘Franzosen und Französinnen’, Die Gartenlaube. Illustriertes Familienblatt 12: 42 (1875), 197–201.Google Scholar
Kessler, H. Journey to the Abyss: The Diaries of Count Harry Kessler, 1880–1918, translated and edited by Easton, L. M. (New York: Vintage Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Kuhn, A. ‘Über das Sammeln von Graphik, Überlegungen anlässlich der Auktion bei Graupe’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 30 (1923), 594–598.Google Scholar
Kurth, W. ‘Neue Graphik im Berliner Kupferstich-Kabinett’, Museum der Gegenwart: Zeitschrift der deutschen Museen fuer neuere Kunst 2: 4, 1932, 155–160.Google Scholar
Kurtz, F. ‘Aus Sammlerkreisen. Kunstsignaturen und Verlagsnummer’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 29 (1923), 571–573.Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 23: 89 (1914).Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 31 : 40 (1922).Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 32: 50 (1923).Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 32: 55 (1923).Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 32: 56 (1923).Google Scholar
La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 32: 83 (1923).Google Scholar
‘La Guerre et la renaissance de l’art français’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 27: 93 (1918).Google Scholar
‘L’Angleterre veut interdire la sortie des oeuvres d’art’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 29: 2 (1920).Google Scholar
‘Leader’, The Times, 4. February 1920.Google Scholar
Léon, P. ‘Nos trésors d’art: II: Nos musées’, Revue des Deux Mondes 37: 4 (1927), 769–790.Google Scholar
‘Leonards Place Kensington’, 14 March 1923, Hansard (HC), vol. 161, cc. 1543–4, https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1923/mar/14/leonards-place-kensington, accessed 8 September 2020].Google Scholar
‘Les nouveaux impôts. Impôt sur le chiffre d’affaires’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 29: 80 (1920).Google Scholar
‘Les Ventes Prochaines, Collection Roger Marx. Tableaux, Dessins et Objets d’art modernes’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 23: 51 (1914).Google Scholar
Letter from Douwe Komter to André Frappart, 11. April 1904, RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History, The Hague, Archief Douwe Komter, 0624, Boekkkondkundige Stukke, Inv. 1–3, no. 1 (91).Google Scholar
‘Letter of C. Hagberg White to the Editors of the Times’, The Times (20 January 1920).Google Scholar
‘Letter to the Editor of the Times, E.M.C’, The Times (22 January 1920).Google Scholar
‘Lettre ouverte à M. Francois Marsal’, La curiosité. Compte-Rendu des Travaux de la Chambre Syndicale de la Curiosité et des Beaux-Arts 63: 19 (1920), 2–3.Google Scholar
‘Liste des Antiquaires étrangers mis sous séquestre’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 24: 10 (1915).Google Scholar
Lloyd George, D. War Memoirs of David Lloyd George, 4 vols, vol. 1 (London: Little, Brown and Company, 1933).Google Scholar
Lugt, F. ‘Teekeningen en Prenten te Frankfort (Veiling Rud. Goldschmift)’, Oude kunst; een maandschrift voor verzamelaars en kunstzinnigen 3: 2 (1917), 55–56.Google Scholar
Lugt, F. ‘Naar Aanleiding der Veiling von Kaufmann’, Oude kunst. Een maandschrift voor verzamelaars en kunstzinnigen 3: 5 (1918) 1917–1918, 132–134.Google Scholar
Lux, J. A. ‘Volkswirtschaft und Kunst’, Ethische Kultur 14: 17 (1906), 130–132, p. 131.Google Scholar
M. ‘Die Millionenstiftungen für amerikanische Museen’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 32: 16 (1920), 330–331.Google Scholar
Madox Ford, F. The Soul of London: A Survey of a Modern City (London: A. Rivers, 1905), [https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks20/2000401h.html, accessed 08 July 2023].Google Scholar
Mahieu, A. (ed.), Kegeljan Franz Jules. Artiste Peintre (1847–1921) Atelier Franz-Jules Kegeljan, Vente Bruxelles, Galerie J.& A. Le Roy Freres (18 February 1924) (Brussels, 1924).Google Scholar
Marinetti, F. T., Boccioni, U., Carrà, C., and Russolo, L., ‘La Battaglia di Venezia. Manifesto Futurista ai Veneziani’, in Marinetti, F. T. (ed.), Guerra Sola Igiene del Mondo, 1915 (Milano: Edizioni Futuriste di Poesia, 1916).Google Scholar
Martini, A. ‘La Purificazione dell’ esercito prussiano/ La purification de l’ armée prussienne’, La Danza Macabra Europea, Set of 12 Postcards (Treviso: Litografia Longo Treviso, 1916).Google Scholar
Math. Lempertz’sche Kunsthandlung (ed.) Katalog einer Sammlung von Gemälden älterer und neuerer Meister aus dem ehemaligen Besitze des Herrn Amtsgerichtsrats Strauven, Düsseldorf und anderer (18. November 1913) (Cologne, 1913).Google Scholar
‘Membres Actifs au 31 Décembre 1903’, Bulletin de la Chambre syndicale des Négociants en objets d’art, tableaux et curiosités 1: 1 8 (1903), 5–8.Google Scholar
Müller-Abensberg, A. ‘Auktion Boerner Leipzig 2–5 Mai 1923’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 35/36 (1923), 665–666.Google Scholar
Muther, R. Geschichte der Malerei im XIX. Jahrhundert, 3 vols. (Munich: G. Hirth Verlag, 1894).Google Scholar
Ojetti, U. ‘Prefazione’, in Bucci, V., Ojetti, U. (eds), Arte italiana contemporanea alla galleria Pesaro, Milano ottobre, Novembre 1921, exhibition catalogue.Google Scholar
Open Letter ‘Im Namen des Verbandes Schwizerischer Antiquare und Kunsthändler, Dr. E. Rothenhäusler and E. Schlaefli, Verband Schweizer Antiquare und Kunsthändler’, Statuten.Google Scholar
Pamphlet in memory of Arthur Kaufmann published for his funeral, courtesy of his son, Professor Michael Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Paragraph 5, Gesetz, betreffend die Ordnung des Reichshaushalts und die Tilgung der Reichsschuld / Anlage 4. Erbschaftssteuergesetz’, Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 31 (1906), 654–674.Google Scholar
Polovcov, A. ‘Correspondence de Russie’, Gazette des beaux-arts: la doyenne des revues d’art 4: 15 (1919), 222–224.Google Scholar
Polovtsov, A. ‘Salvage of Works of Art in Russia’, The Burlington Magazine 34: 4 (1919), 160–161.Google Scholar
Prestel (ed.). Handzeichnungen des 19. Jahrhunderts aus dem Nachlasse der Freifrau Luise von Seebach- Moderne Graphik aus dem Nachlasse von Professor Karl Koepping und anderer Besitz. Katalog zur Versteigerung der Firma F.A.C Prestel (25 October 1915) (Frankfurt, 1915).Google Scholar
‘Proposition de loi tenant à une nouvelle réglementation des ventes d’objets d’art et mobiliers appartenant à l’État’, Chambre des Députés, session 2014, 3 November 1925, 1–11.Google Scholar
‘Protestation des Antiquaires belges contre les décrets’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 29: 59 (1920).Google Scholar
Reichskommissariat für Kulturaufgaben, Nr. 39 Kabinettssitzung vom 10. April 1919, 18 Uhr, Weimar, Nationalversammlung, Akten der Reichskanzlei, Weimarer Republik online, Bundesarchiv, Berlin [www.bundesarchiv.de/aktenreichskanzlei/1919-1933/00a/sch/sch1p/kap1_2/kap2_42/para3_6.html?highlight=true&search=&stemming=true&pnd=&start=152&end=152&field=all#highlightedTerm, accessed 18 March 2019]Google Scholar
R.O. ‘Die Sammlung Wilhelm Clemens’, Kunstchronik und Kunsmarkt 31: 52 (1920), 993–995.Google Scholar
Rossacher, K. ‘Die Ausfuhr von Kunstgegenständen und Antiquitäten in Österreich’, Die Weltkunst 29: 6 (1959), 10.Google Scholar
Rudolph Lepke’s Kunst-Auctions-Haus (ed.). Galerie Weber, Hamburg: Versteigerung (20–22 February 1912) (Berlin, 1912).Google Scholar
Rudolph Lepke’s Kunst-Auctions-Haus (ed.). Gemälde alter Meister des 14. Bis 18. Jahrhunderts: Sammlungen: Geza von Osmitz, Preßburg, C.Chr. E. Meyer, Bremen und andere Beiträge aus Privatbesitz (11 March 1913) (Berlin, 1913).Google Scholar
Rudolph Lepke’s Kunst-Auctions-Haus (ed.). Ölgemälde und Aquarelle erster Meister unserer Zeit: dabei Werke aus den künstlerichen Nachlassen des Prof. Woldemar Friedrich, Berlin und des Professors Victor Paul Mohn, Berlin (10 February 1914) (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Rudolph Lepke’s Kunst Auktionshaus (ed.). Kunstsammlung des verstorbenen Ludwig Freiherr von Schake auf Schönfeld (10/11 May 1914) (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar
Rudolph Lepke’s Kunst-Auctions-Haus (ed.). Nachlass Wilhelm Trübner: Versteigerung (4 June 1918) (Berlin, 1918).Google Scholar
Schickele, R. Werke in 3 Bänden, eds. Kasten, H. and Schickele, A. (Cologne: Kiepeneuer & Witsch, 1959).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York and London: Harper & Brothers, 1942).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J., Konjunkturzyklen. Eine theoretische, historische und statistische Analyse des kapitalistischen Prozesses (1939) vol. 1 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Roprecht, 1961).Google Scholar
Seligman, G. Merchants of Art: Eighty Years of Professional Collecting (New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1961).Google Scholar
Simmel, G. The Philosophy of Money (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 2004 [1907]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. ‘Vom Realismus in der Kunst’, Der Morgen. Wochenschrift für deutsche Kultur 2: 31 (1908), 992–998.Google Scholar
‘Suppression de la Loi sur les Exportations’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 30: 135 (1921).Google Scholar
Szkolny, F. ‘Die Luxussteuer auf Kunstwerke’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 34: 21 (1923), 396–404.Google Scholar
Szkolny, F. ‘Der Kampf gegen die Luxussteuer’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 35: 13 (1925), 229.Google Scholar
Taine, H. Philosophie de l’Art, 2 vols. (Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1906), pp. 234–235.Google Scholar
‘The Knockout. A collector’s experiences (from a correspondent)’, The Times (4 February 1920).Google Scholar
The Lay Figure. ‘On the Art of Collecting’, Studio: International Art 62: 255 (1914), 70.Google Scholar
The Lay Figure. ‘On Vanishing Markets’, Studio: International Art 87: 371 (1924), 120.Google Scholar
Tietze, H. ‘Nachschrift. Die Sammlung Ludwig Lobmeyer-Wien’, Der Kunstmarkt 15: 7 (1917).Google Scholar
Tzara, T. Manifesti del Dadaismo e Lampisterie, ed. Posani, G. (Milano: Einaudi, 1975).Google Scholar
Uhde, W. Von Bismarck bis Picasso. Erinnerungen und Bekenntnisse [1938, Zurich] (Zurich: Römerhof Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
‘Un nouvel antiquaire s’installe Place Vendôme’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 22: 75 (1913).Google Scholar
‘Un Timbre est adjugé 300000 Francs à la vente Ferrari de la Renotière’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 31: 42 (1922).Google Scholar
‘Une consequence économique de la baisse du Mark’, Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 30: 137 (1921).Google Scholar
‘Vente à Bruxelles de la collection Mascha’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 30: 137 (1921).Google Scholar
‘Ventes Allemandes. Bibliothèque du Dr Bode’, La Gazette de l’Hôtel Drouot 31: 6 (1922).Google Scholar
‘Verordnung über die Ausfuhr von Kunstwerken vom 11. Dezember 1919’, Reichsgesetz Blatt 236 (1919), 1961–1962.Google Scholar
‘Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten über die Ausfuhr von Kunstwerken vom 20. Dezember 1932’, Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 82 (1932), 572.Google Scholar
‘Versteigerungsergebnisse in Leipzig und München’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 33: 10 (1921), 178.Google Scholar
‘Versteigerungsergebnisse in Köln und Berlin’, Kunstchronik und Kunstmarkt 33: 15 (1922), 255.Google Scholar
Weber, M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Chapter 4. (Tübingen: Mohr, 1922).Google Scholar
Werner Laurie, T. ‘Art in the Dumps- Special Report of the Tariff Commission’, Observer (6 October 1906).Google Scholar
Witt, R. ‘Export for Art Treasures. Deterrent Measures Ineffectual, Sir Witt on French experiments’, The Times (24 January 1922).Google Scholar
Works of Art (Export Duty). 24 November 1919, vol. 121, cc. 1429–30, Oral Answers to questions, Hansard (HC) [https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1919/nov/24/works-of-art-export-duty accessed 25 May 2021].Google Scholar
Works of Art (Exportation). Written Answers, 19 March 1920, Hansard (HC), vol. 127, c. 911 [https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1920-03-29/debates/fc58d8fa-de3b-4481-827d-c8e666909bf4/WrittenAnswers, accessed 22 May 2021].Google Scholar
‘Xudozhestvennaia letopis, isskustvo i voina’, Apollon, January 1917 (No. 1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Zola, E. Au Bonheur des Dames. Les Rougon-Macquart (Paris: G. Charpentier et E. Fasquelle, 1883).Google Scholar
Abadie, D. Die Kunst des Handelns: Meisterwerke des 14. bis 20. Jahrhunderts bei Fritz und Peter Nathan (Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar
Abbenhuis, M. M. The Art of Staying Neutral: The Netherlands in the First World War, 1914–1918 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Adams, D. S. ‘Contemporary Perceptions of the First World War Reflected in the Capital Markets’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 63: 1 (2015), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agathocleaous, T. and Rudy, R. J. ‘Victorian Cosmopolitanisms: Introduction’, Victorian Literature and Culture 38: 2 (2010), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F. R. Literary Life in German Expressionism and the Berlin Circles (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Alvi, M. ‘The Land of Cockaigne: The German Art Market and the First World War’, German History 38: 4 (2020), 594–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. ‘The Political Power of Connoisseurship in Nineteenth Century Europe: Wilhelm von Bode versus Giovanni Morelli’, Jahrbuch der Berliner Museen. Band ‘Kennerschaft’ 38 (1996), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. P. and Silver, K. (eds), Chaos and Classicism: Art in France, Italy and Germany, 1918–1936, exhibition catalogue (New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 2010).Google Scholar
Arvidsson, A. ‘Between Fascism and the American Dream: Advertising in the Interwar Italy’, Social Science History 25: 2 (2001), 151–186.Google Scholar
Assouline, P. An Artful Life: A Biography of D. H. Kahnweiler 1884–1979 (New York: Fromm International, 1991).Google Scholar
Augustine, D. ‘Arriving in the Upper Class; the Wealthy Business Elite of Wilhelmine Germany’, in Blackbourn, D. and Evans, R. J. (eds), The German Bourgeoisie: Essays on the Social History of the German Middle Class from the Late Eighteenth to the Early Twentieth Century (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Avery-Quash, S. and Huemer, C. (eds), London and the Emergence of a European Art Market, 1780–1820 (Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2019).Google Scholar
Bailkin, J. ‘Picturing Feminism, Selling Liberalism: The Case of the Disappearing Holbein’, Gender and History 11: 1 (1999), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailkin, J. The Culture of Property: The Crisis of Liberalism in Modern Britain (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Balderston, T. ‘War Finance and Inflation in Britain and Germany, 1914–1918’, The Economic History Review 42: 2 (1989), 222–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, P. and Trodd, C. (eds), Governing Cultures: Art Institutions in Victorian London (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Barro, J. R. ‘Convergence and Modernisation’, The Economic Journal 125: 585 (2015), 911–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass-Krueger, M., Edwards-Dujardin, H., and Kurkdjian, S. (eds), Fashion, Society, and the First World War: International Perspectives (London: Bloomsbury, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baubeau, P. ‘War Finance (France)’, in Daniel, U., Gatrell, P., Janz, O., Jones, H., Keene, J., Kramer, A., and Nasson, B. (eds), 1914–1918-online: International Encyclopedia of the First World War, http://doi.org/10.15463/ie1418.10022.Google Scholar
Baubeau, P. and Ögren, A. ‘Determinants of National Financial Systems: The Role of Historical Events’, in Baubeau, P. and Ögren, A. (eds), Convergence and Divergence of National Financial Systems: Evidence from the Gold Standards, 1871–1971 (London, 2010), pp. 127–143.Google Scholar
Baumol, J. W. ‘Unnatural Value: Or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game’, American Economic Review 86: 1 (1986), 133–157.Google Scholar
Bauschinger, S. Die Cassirers: Unternehmer, Kunsthändler, Philosophen. Biographie einer Familie (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2016).Google Scholar
Bayer, W., ‘Pretiosen für Devisen: Sowjetische Kunstexporte nach Deutschland in der Zwischenkriegszeit’, Jahrbücher für die Geschichte Osteuropas 48: 2 (2000), 250–263.Google Scholar
Bayer, T. and Page, R. J. The Development of the Art Market: Money as Muse 1730–1900 (London: Pickering&Chatto, 2011).Google Scholar
Becker, A. ‘Arts’, in Winter, J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Becker, J. J. Comment les Français sont entrés dans la guerre (Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 1977).Google Scholar
Becker, S. ‘Kreuzzug des Geistes zur Rettung des Menschen: Die Expressionisten und der Erste Weltkrieg’, KulturPoetik 16: 2 (2016), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beloubek-Hammer, A. Die Aktion Entartete Kunst 1937 im Berliner Kupferstichkabinett. Kustos Willy Kurth rettet Meisterblätter der Moderne (Berlin: Lukas Verlag, 2023).Google Scholar
Benjamin, D. and Kochin, L. ‘Searching for an Explanation of Unemployment in Interwar Britain’, Journal of Political Economy 87 (1979), 441–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, A. ‘The Russian Revolution and The Burlington Magazine: A letter from Alexander Polovtsov’, The Burlington Magazine Index Blog; online edn, April 2017 [https://burlingtonindex.wordpress.com/2017/04/02/the-russian-revolution-and-the-burlington-magazine-a-letter-from-alexander-polovtsov/, accessed 15 April 2017].Google Scholar
Berg, M. ‘Luxury, the Luxury Trades and the Roots of Industrial Growth: A Global Perspective’, in Trentmann, F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on the History of Consumption (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Berghoff, H., Logemann, J. and Römer, F. (eds), The Consumer on the Home Front: World War II Civilian Consumption in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Beyme, V. K. Das Zeitalter der Avantgarden. Kunst und Gesellschaft 1905–1955 (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2005).Google Scholar
Blackbourn, D. and Evans, J. R. (eds) The German Bourgeoisie: Essays on the Social History of the German Middle Class from the Late Eighteenth to the Early Twentieth Century (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Boime, A. ‘Les hommes d’affaires et les arts en France au XIXème siècle’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 28 (1979), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, J. M. Vraag en aanbod op de Nederlandse kunstmarkt, 1580–1700, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, 1994.Google Scholar
Boorman, H. ‘Rethinking the Expressionist Era. Wilhelmine Cultural Debates and Prussian Elements in German Expressionism’, Oxford Art Journal 9: 2 (1986), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, J. (ed.), War and Art: A History of Modern Conflict (London: Reaktion Books, 2017).Google Scholar
Breckman, W. ‘Disciplining Consumption: The Debate about luxury in Wilhelmine Germany, 1890–1914’, Journal of Social History 24 (1991), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettel, R. Modern Art, 1851–1929: Capitalism and Representation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Breyer, T. ‘Medien der Latenz. Zur Konjenkturzyklen bei Zola und Juglar’, Medien der Finanz. Archiv für Mediengeschichtes 17 (2017): 5–15.Google Scholar
Brockington, G. ‘The Soldier and the Marionette: Puppet Imagery in British Art of the First World War’, in Brockington, G. and Miller, C.F.B (eds), Of Modernism: Essays in Honour of Christopher Green (London: Paul Holberton Publishing, 2020), 129–157.Google Scholar
Brüggen Israels, M. ‘Mrs Berenson, Mrs. Gardner and Miss Toplady: Connoisseurship, Collecting and Commerce in London (1898–195)’, Visual Resources 33: 1–2 (2017), 158–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caglioti, L. D. Enemy Aliens and National Belonging from the French Revolution to the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Carbon, S. (director), ‘Harry Graf Kessler – Der Mann, der alle kannte’, Deutsche Lebensläufe| ARD-alpha documentary, 20 January 2015.Google Scholar
Carden-Coyne, A., Morris, D., and Wilcox, T. (eds) The Sensory War 1914–2014 (Manchester: Manchester Art Gallery, 2014).Google Scholar
Cardoso Denis, R. and Trodd, C. (eds) Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Castelluccio, S. Le commerce du luxe à Paris aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles: échanges nationaux at internationaux (Bern: Peter Lang, 2009).Google Scholar
Catterson, L. (ed.) Florence, Berlin and Beyond: Late Nineteenth-Century Art Markets and Their Social Networks (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charle, C. ‘Les élites culturelles en France au XIXème siècle Inventaire des recherches récentes sur la genèse des intellectuels contemporains’, in Hudemann, R. and Soutou, G. H. (eds), Wirtschaftseliten in Frankreich und Deutschland. Zu Perspektiven vergleichender Elitenforschung (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1994), 45–63.Google Scholar
Charpy, M. ‘La rareté partagée. Commerces et consommations des antiquités et des curiosités au XIXème siècle (Paris, Londres et New York)’, in Coquery, N. and Bonnet, A. (eds), Le commerce du luxe. Production, Exposition et circulation des objets précieux du moyen age à nos jours (Paris: Mare et Martin, 2015), 289–297.Google Scholar
Charrier, L. ‘Die Friedensbemühungen Harry Graf Kesslers im Ersten Weltkrieg’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Geschichte 63: 3 (2013), 527–535.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. and Fine, B., ‘The Value of Financialization and the Financialization of Value’, in Mader, P., Mertens, D., and van der Zwan, N. (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Financialization (London: Routledge, 2020), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. I sonnambuli. Come l’ Europa arrivò alla Grande Guerra (Bari: Laterza, 2016).Google Scholar
Coffin Hanson, A. Manet and the Modern Tradition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Cork, R. A Bitter Truth: Avant-Garde Art and the Great War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Daumas, C. J. La révolution matérielle: une histoire de la consommation; France, XIXe–XXIe siècle (Paris: Flammarion, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, G. Art as an investment in a historical perspective, unpublished PhD thesis, Tilburg University, 2016.Google Scholar
David, G. and Oosterlinck, K. ‘War, Monetary Reforms and the Belgian Art Market, 1945–1951’, Financial History Review 22: 2 (2015), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, G., Li, Y., Oosterlinck, K., and Renneboog, L. Art in Times of Crisis (September 2021). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16575 [https://ssrn.com/abstract=3960146, accessed 10 January 2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dejung, C. and Petersson, P. N. (eds). The Foundations of Worldwide Economic Integration: Power, institutions, and Global Markets, 1850–1930 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellheim, C. Belonging and Betrayal: How Jews Made the Art World Modern (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, N. and Van Miegroet, H. J. ‘Art, Value, and Market Practices in the Netherlands in the Seventeenth Century’, Art Bulletin 76: 3 (1994), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demm, E. ‘Propaganda and Caricature in the First World War’, Journal of Contemporary History 28: 1 (January 1993), 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denscher, B. ‘Der Plakatsammler Ottokar Mascha (1852–1929)’, Austrian Posters. Beiträge zur Geschichte der visuellen Kommunikation [www.austrianposters.at/2010/09/01/der-plakatsammler-ottokar-1852-1929, accessed 10 April 2017].Google Scholar
De Silva, D. et al. Market Evolution of Art Dealers (28 August 2017) [https://ssrn.com/abstract=2866949, accessed 20 October 2020].Google Scholar
De Vries, J. The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy, 1650 to the Present (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebner, S. ‘Ludwig Pollak in cerca di aiuto presso Corrado Ricci (1922)’, in Rossini, O. (ed.), Ludwig Pollak, Archeologo e mercante d’ arte. Praga 1868-Auschwitz 1943. Gli anni d’ oro del collezionismo internazionale da Giovanni Baracco a Sigmund Freud (Roma: Gangemi Editore, 2019), 195–207.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, J. B. ‘Did Speculation Destabilize the French Franc in the 1920s’, Explorations in Economic History 19 (1982), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eley, G. ‘Review. A.J. Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981)’, The Journal of Modern History 54: 1 (1982), 95–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderlein, A. Der Berliner Kunsthandel in der Weimarer Republik und im NS-Staat (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. Rethinking German History: Nineteenth-Century Germany and the Origins of the Third Reich (London: Allen & Unwin, 1987).Google Scholar
Fasianos, D. G. and Pierros, C. Have We Been Here Before? Phases of Financialization within the 20th Century in the United States, Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series 869 (2016) [SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2801088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2801088. accessed 16 August 2023].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feilchenfeldt, E. R. ‘Grete Ring als Kunsthistorikerin im Exil’, in Hudson-Weidemann, U. and Schmeichel-Falkenberg, B. (eds), Grenzen Überschreiten: Frauen, Kunst und Exil (Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 2005), 131–151.Google Scholar
Feilchenfeldt, K. ‘Briefe von Paul Cassirer und seinem Team. Aus der Werkstatt einer entstehenden Briefausgabe mit einer Auswahl von Briefen’, in Feilchenfeldt, R. E. and Raff, T. (eds), Ein Fest der Künste (Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag, 2006), 363–384.Google Scholar
Feldman, G. The Great Disorder: Politics, Economics and Society in the German Inflation 1914–1924 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Fest, J., Bürgerlichkeit als Lebensform. Späte Essays (Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar
Field, F. British and French Writers of the First World War: Comparative Studies in Cultural History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Fine, B. ‘The Material and Culture of Financialisation’, New Political Economy 22: 4 (2017), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, M. P. ‘Creating the French Gallery: Ernest Gambart and the Rise of the Commercial Art Gallery in Mid-Victorian London’, Nineteenth Century Art Worldwide 6: 1 (2017) [http://19thc-artworldwide.org/46-spring07/spring07article/143-creating-the-french-gallery-ernest-gambart-and-the-rise-of-the-commercial-art-gallery-in-mid-victorian-london, accessed 18 September 2017].Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. ‘Shopping for Art: The Rise of the Commercial Art Gallery, 1850s–90s’, in Fletcher, P. and Helmreich, A. (eds), The Rise of the Modern Art Market (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. and Helmreich, A. (eds). The Rise of the Modern Art Market (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. and Dauter, L. ‘The Sociology of Markets’, The Annual Review of Sociology 33 (2007), 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluegel, J. and Rubin, W. (eds). Pablo Picasso – Retrospektive im Museum of Modern Art, New York (Munich: Prestel, 1980).Google Scholar
Fox, J. British Art and the First World War, 1914–1924 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. Erbschaftssteuer und Unternehmung. Eine steuerrechtliche und betriebswirtschaftliche Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung des britischen, französischen und schweizerischen Rechts, Schritten zum Steuerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H. ‘Writing Cosmopolis: The Cosmopolitan Aesthetics of Emilia Dilke and Vernon Lee’, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 19: 28 (2019), 1–22.Google Scholar
Fuchsgruber, L. ‘Markt und Manipulation in der historischen Auktionshausliteratur’, Trajectoires 10 (2016) [http://trajectoires.revues.org/2112, accessed 27 May 2018].Google Scholar
Fuhrmeister, C. and Kienlechner, S. ‘Gegenwart und Ahnung. Inwiefern war der Münchner Kunsthistoriker August Liebmann Mayer (1885–1944) Vorbild für die Figur des Martin Krüger in Lion Feuchtwangers Roman „Erfolg” (1930)?’, Literatur in Bayern 24: 93 (2008), 32–44.Google Scholar
Fyfe, G. ‘Structure, Knowledge and Practice: Art Exhibitions and Power during the Nineteenth Century’, Sociological Review 32: 5 (1984), 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, G. Art, Power, and Modernity: English Art Institutions, 1750–1950 (London: Leicester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Gaehtgens, W. T. ‘Wilhelm von Bode und seine Sammler’, in Gaehtgens, T. W. (ed.), Die Berliner Museumsinsel im Deutschen Kaisserreich. Zur Kulturpolitik der Museen in der wilhelminischen Epoche (Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 1992).Google Scholar
Gaehtgens, W. T. ‘Ein Bismarck der Künste. Kenner, Sammler, Forscher: Wilhelm von Bode’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (9. December 1995).Google Scholar
Garside, W. R. British Unemployment: 1919–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautherie-Kampka, A. Les Allemands du dôme. La colonie allemande de Montparnasse dans les années 1903–1914 (Bern: Peter Lang, 1995).Google Scholar
Gay, P. Schnitzler’s Century: The Making of Middle-Class Culture, 1815–1914 (London: Allen Lane, 2001).Google Scholar
Gee, M. D. Critics and Collectors of Modern Paintings: Aspects of the Parisian Art Market between 1910 and 1930 (London: Taylor & Francis, 1981).Google Scholar
Gell, A. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, M. Verkehrte Welt: Revolution, Inflation und Moderne 1914–1924 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetzmann, N. W., Renneboog, L., and Spaenjers, C., ‘Art and Money’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 101: 3 (2011), 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, L. Neoclassical International Economics: An Historical Survey (London: Palgrave Mac Millan, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French art, 1916–1928 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gregory, A. The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Guex, S. ‘Le marché suisse de l’art au XXe siècle. Survol chiffré et comparaison internationale’, in Guex, S. and Jaccard, P. A. (eds), Le marché de l’art en Suisse. Du XIXe siècle à nos jours (Zürich and Lausanne: SIK ISEA, 2011), 233–273.Google Scholar
Haiven, M. Cultures of Financialization: Fictitious Capital in Popular Culture and Everyday Life (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘“Halten uns strikt an die Sanktionen”: Londoner Auktionshäuser sagen Verkäufe russischer Kunst ab’, Der Spiegel [www.spiegel.de/kultur/russische-kunst-londoner-auktionshaeuser-sagen-verkaeufe-ab-a-c28b43c0-cd56-4bfd-bea0-6595f2539fba, accessed 17 March 2022].Google Scholar
Hardtwig, W. (ed.). Ordnungen in der Krise: zur politischen Kulturgeschichte Deutschland 1900–1933 (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, F. Rediscoveries in Art: Some Aspects of Taste, Fashion and Collecting in England and France (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Heilbrun, J. ‘Keynes and the Economics of Art’, Journal of Cultural Economics 8: 2 (1984), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinich, N. L’élite artiste. Excellence et singularité en régime democratique (Paris: Gallimard, 2005).Google Scholar
Helmreich, A. ‘The Art Dealer and Taste: The Case of David Croal Thomson and the Goupil Gallery, 1885–1897’, Visual Culture in Britain 6: 2 (2005), 31–49.Google Scholar
Helmreich, A. ‘Traversing Objects: The London Art Market at the Turn of the Twentieth Century’, in Goulde, C. and Mesplède, S. (eds), Marketing Art in the British Isles, 1700 to the Present: A Cultural History (London: Ashgate, 2012), 135–147.Google Scholar
Hemingway, A. and Vaughan, W. Art in Bourgeois Society, 1790–1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hilary, J. ‘Creating “a palace of art” The Lost Collection of Leopold and Mathilde Hirsch’, Journal of the History of Collections, Bildung beyond borders: German–Jewish collectors outside Germany, 34: 3 (2022), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtfrerich, L. The German Inflation 1914–1923: Causes and Effects in International Perspective (Berlin and New York, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, P. Rogues’ Gallery: A History of Art and Its Dealers (London: Profile Books, 2018).Google Scholar
Horne, J. ‘Demobilizing the Mind: France and the Legacy of the Great War, 1919–1939’, French History and Civilization 2 (2009), 101–119.Google Scholar
Horowitz, R. et al. ‘Meat for the Multitudes: Market Culture in Paris, New York City, and Mexico City Over the Long Nineteenth Century’, The American Historical Review 109: 4 (2004), 1055–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. ‘Rome, London and Boston: Colnaghi, Bernard Berenson and the Sale of Botticelli’s Madonna of the Eucharist to Isabella Stewart Gardner’, in Catterson, L. (ed.), Florence, Berlin and Beyond: Late Nineteenth-Century Art Markets and Their Social Networks (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2020), 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huemer, C. ‘Spitzer, Fréderic’, Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon 13 (Lfg 59, 2007), p. 39 [http://d-nb.info/gnd/128809833, accessed 20 May 2021].Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Irwin Lewis, B. Art for All? The Collision of Modern Art and the Public in Late Nineteenth-century Germany (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ives, C. et al. (eds), The Private Collection of Edgar Degas: A Summary Catalogue (New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1997).Google Scholar
Jaccard, P. ‘Le take-off du marché de l’art en Suisse romande durant la Première Guerre mondiale’, Traverse: Zeitschrift für Geschichte = Revue d’histoire 9 (2002), 1–28.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P. ‘Der Kunst- und Kulturgütermarkt in der Schweiz. Von der Geburtsstunde des Bundesstates bis zum Inkrafttreten der Unesco Konvention’, in Schweizerisches Institut für Kunstwissenschaft im Auftrag der Jubiläumsstiftung der Credit Suisse (ed.), Das Kuntschaffen in der Schweiz 1848–2006 (Bern und Zürich: SIK ISEA, 2006), 165–179.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. Marketing Modernism in Fin de Siècle Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Johnson, D. ‘Cassatt’s Color Prints of 1891: The Unique Evolution of a Palette’, Notes in the History of Art 9: 3 (1990), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux-Prunel, B. ‘Provincializing Paris. The Center-Periphery Narrative of Modern Art in Light of Quantitative and Transnational Approaches’, Artl@s Bulletin, Spatial (Digital) Art History 4: 1 (2015), 40–64.Google Scholar
Joyeux-Prunel, B. Les Avant-gardes artistiques. Une histoire transnationale, vol. 1, 1848–1918 (Paris: Gallimard, 2016).Google Scholar
Joyeux-Prunel, B. Les Avant-gardes artistiques. Une histoire transnational, vol. 2, 1918–1945 (Paris: Gallimard, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux-Prunel, B. Naissance de l’art contemporain. Une histoire mondiale, 1945–1970 (Paris: CNRS Editions, 2020).Google Scholar
Kjærboe, R. Collecting the Modern. Ordrupgaard and the Collection Museums of Modernist Art, unpublished Phd dissertation, Aarhus University, 2016.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, H. and Helgesson, C. ‘Multiple Versions of Markets: Multiplicity and Performativity in Market Practice’, Industrial Marketing Management 35: 7 (2006), 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopp, W. ‘Kulturpolitik, Kunstförderung und Mäzenatentum im Kaiserreich. Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Staatskonservatismus und bürgerlicher Liberalität’, in Braun, G. and Braun, W. (eds), Mäzenatentum in Berlin. Bürgersinn und kulturelle Kompetenz unter sich verändernden Bedingungen (Berlin: DeGruyter, 1993), 15–38.Google Scholar
Kocka, J. ‘Vorindustrielle Faktoren in der deutschen Industrialisierung’, in Das Kaiserliche Deutschland, ed Stürmer, M. (Düsseldorf: Droste, 1970), 265–266.Google Scholar
Kocka, J. ‘Bürgertum und Bürgerlichkeit als Probleme der deutschen Geschichte vom späten 18. zum frühen 20. Jahrhundert’, in Kocka, J. (ed.), Bürger und Bürgerlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987), 21–63.Google Scholar
Koddenbrock, K. I., Kvangraven, H., and Samba Sylla, N. ‘Beyond Financialisation: The longue durée of Finance and Production in the Global South’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 46: 4 (2022), 703–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollnitz, A. ‘Is Beauty Useless?’, in Bass-Krueger, M., Edwards-Dujardin, H., and Kurkdjian, S. (eds), Fashion, Society, and the First World War: International Perspectives (London: Bloomsbury, 2021), 288–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, W. Wilhelm II. und die Moderne. Der Kaiser und die technisch-industrielle Welt (Paderborn: Wolfgang König, 2007).Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. ‘The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as a Process’, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Lives of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, R. Kritik und Krise. Eine Studie zur Pathogenese der bürgerlichen Welt (Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar
Kostyrko, D. The Journal of a Transatlantic Art Dealer. René Gimpel 1918–1939 (London: Brepols, 2017).Google Scholar
Kott, C. Préserver l’art de l’ennemi? Le patrimoine artistique en Belgique et en France occupées, 1914–1918 (Bern and Oxford: Peter Lang, 2006).Google Scholar
Krause, T. ‘Das war der größte deutsche Dandy’, Die Welt (25 May 2016) [www.welt.de/kultur/article155673698/Das-war-der-groesste-deutsche-Dandy.html, accessed 15 February 2018].Google Scholar
Krebs, D. (ed.). Auf den Strassen von Berlin. Der Fotograf Willy Römer (Bönen: Kettler Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Krippner, G. ‘The Financialization of the American Economy’, Socio-Economic Review 3: 2 (2005), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacambre, G. ‘Les institutions du Second Empire et le Salon des Refuses’, in Haskell, F. (ed.), Saloni, gallerie, musei e la loro Influenza sullo sviluppo dell’arte dei secoli XIX e XX, Atti del XXIV Congresso C.I.H.A. (Bologna: CLUEB, 1981).Google Scholar
Lahaie, O. La guerre secrète en Suisse (1914–1918): Espionnage, propagande et influence en pays neutre pendant la Grande Guerre (Saint Denis: Connaissances et Savoirs, 2017).Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. Profiting without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All (London: Verso, 2013).Google Scholar
Lazzaro, E. and Moureau, N. ‘Auctioneers vs. Commissaires-priseurs: The Carnival Mirror of Profession Regulation in the International Art Market’, The European Journal of Comparative Economics 10: 2 (2013), 159–176.Google Scholar
Lenman, R. ‘Der deutsche Kunstmarkt 1840–1923’, in Mai, E. and Paret, P. (eds), Integration, Veränderung, Wachstum, in Kunstförderung in Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1993), 135–154.Google Scholar
Lenman, R. Artists and Society in Germany 1850–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Levinger, E. Constructivism in Central Europe: Painting, Typography, Photomontage (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. ‘The German Art Historians of World War I: Grautoff, Wiehert, Weisbach, and Brinckmann and the Activities of the Zentralstelle für Auslandsdienst’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 74 (2011), 373–400.Google Scholar
Lipovetsky, G. and Serroy, J. L’esthétisation du monde. Vivre à l’ âge du capitalisme artiste (Paris: Gallimard, 2013).Google Scholar
Lloyd George, D. War Memoirs of David Lloyd George, 4 vols, vol. 1 (London: Little, Brown and Company, 1933).Google Scholar
Lothar-Kroll, F. ‘Kultur, Bildung und Wissenschaft im 20. Jahrhundert’, Enzyklopädie deutscher Geschichte 65 (Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Magraw, R. France 1815–1914: The Bourgeois Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Mai, E., Paret, P., and Severin, I. (eds). Kunstförderung in Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Cologne, Weimar and Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
Maingon, C. Le musée invisible. Le Louvre et la Grande Guerre (1914–1921) (Rouen: Presses Universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, 2016).Google Scholar
Malinowsi, S. ‘Their Favorite Enemy: German Social Historians and the Prussian Nobility’, in Müller, S. O. and Torp, C. (eds), Imperial Germany Revisited: Continuing Debates and New Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Malvano, L. ‘Gromaire, Marcel’, Treccani Enciclopedia Italiana, IV Appendice (1979) [www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/marcel-gromaire_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/, accessed online, 23 March 2024].Google Scholar
Mandler, P. ‘Against “Englishness”: English Culture and the Limits to Rural Nostalgia, 1850–1940’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 7 (1997), 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, P. ‘Art, Death and Taxes: The Taxation of Works of Art in Britain, 1796–1914’, Historical Research 74: 185 (2001), 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. The Deluge: British Society and the First World War (London: Pelican Books, 1967).Google Scholar
Mayer, J. A. The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981).Google Scholar
Maza, S. The Myth of the French Bourgeoisie: An Essay on the Social Imaginary, 1750–1850 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazaroff, S. Henry Walters and Bernard Berenson: Collector and Connoisseur (Baltimore: Johns Hopkinks University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibbin, R. Classes and Cultures, England 1918–1951 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Meiksins Wood, E. The Pristine Culture of Capitalism: A Historical Essay on Old Regimes and Modern States (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
Mettinger, E. M. R. and Türschmann, J. (eds). Rive Gauche: Paris as a Site of Avant-garde Art and Cultural Exchange in the 1920s (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. and Savoy, B. (eds). The Museum Is Open: Towards a Transnational History of Museums 1750–1940 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Mezey, N. ‘Mapping Cultural Studies of Law’, in Sarat, A. and Ewick, P. (eds), Handbook of Law and Society (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015), 39–55.Google Scholar
Michel, P. ‘Le Tableau et son prix à Paris’, in Turpin, A. and Warren, J. (eds), Auctions, Agents and Dealers: The Mechanisms of the Art Market 1660–1830 (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007), 53–69.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. ‘Auction Theory’, in Bewley, T. F. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 1–32.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. International Historical Statistics: Europe 1750–1933 (London: Palgrave & MacMillan, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollan, S. and Michie, R. ‘The City of London as an International Commercial Centre since 1900’, Enterprise and Society 13: 3 (2012), 538–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, W. ‘Der erste Weltkrieg und die Krise Europas’, in Hirschfeld, G. and Krumeich, G. (eds), Keiner fühlt sich hier als Mensch…, Erlebnis und Wirkung des Ersten Weltkriegs (Essen: Fischer, 1993), 25–41.Google Scholar
Montias, J. Artists and Artisans in Delft: A Socio-economic Study of the Seventeenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Morris, E. French Art in Nineteenth Century Britain (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Moulin, R. The French Art Market, A Sociological View (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Muel-Dreyfus, F. ‘La réeducation de la sociologie sous le régime de Vichy’, Actes sur la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 153: 3 (2004), 65–77.Google Scholar
Newall, C. The Grosvenor Gallery Exhibitions: Change and Continuity in the Victorian Art World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Nezzo, M. ‘“Fra Avanguardia e Ritorno all” Ordine: Leonardo Dudrevil e il Movimentismo Italiano dei Primi Anni ’20’, Partibus et Historiae 29: 57 (2008), 149–164.Google Scholar
Novicevic, M. M. ‘The History of the Modernisation Construct: Tracing the Contribution of Business and Economic Historians’, Journal of Management History 23: 1 (2017), 51–73.Google Scholar
Nugent, J. ‘Germany’s Classical Turn from the Great Disorder to a Kingdom of the Dead’, in Silver, K. (ed.), Chaos and Classicism: Art in France, Italy and Germany, 1918–1936 (New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 2010), 159–166.Google Scholar
Obenaus, M. Für die Nation gesichert? Das Verzeichnis der national wertvollen Kunstwerke. Entstehung, Etablierung, und Instrumentalisierung 1919–1945 (Berlin: DeGruyter, 2016).Google Scholar
Offer, A. ‘Between the Gift and the Market: The Economy of Regard’, The Economic History Review 50: 3 (1997), 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, L. ‘Exchange Rates Between the United States Dollar and Forty-one Currencies’, MeasuringWorth, 2024 [www.measuringworth.com/exchangeglobal/ accessed 26 July 2023].Google Scholar
Ohlsen, M. Wilhelm von Bode: Zwischen Kaisermacht und Kunsttempel (Berlin: Gebrüder Mann, 1995).Google Scholar
Oosterlinck, K. ‘Art as a Wartime Investment: Conspicuous Consumption and Discretion’, The Economic Journal 127: 607 (2017), 2665–2701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormrod, D. ‘Art and Its Markets’, The Economic History Review, New Series 52: 3 (1999), 544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormrod, D. ‘The Art Trade and Its Urban Context: England and the Netherlands compared, 1550–1750’, in Turpin, A. and Warren, J. (eds), Auctions, Agents and Dealers: The Mechanisms of the Art Market 1660–1830 (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007), 11–21.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. and Williamson, J. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Oschilewski, G. W. Zeitungen in Berlin. Im Spiegel der Jahrhunderte (Berlin: Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchandlung, 1975).Google Scholar
Osterman, G. Richard Bergh och Nationalmuseum: Några dokument (Stockholm: Nationalmuseum, 1958).Google Scholar
Panter, S., Paulmann, J., and Szöllösi-Janze, M. (eds), Mobility and Biography: Methodological Challenges and Perspectives (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016).Google Scholar
Paret, P. ‘The Tschudi Affair’, The Journal of Modern History 53: 4 (1981), 589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paret, P. German Encounters with Modernism 1840–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Patry, S. (ed.). Inventing Impressionism: Paul Durand Ruel and the Modern Art Market (London: National Gallery Publications, 2015).Google Scholar
Paul, B. ‘Collecting Is the Noblest of All Passions. Wilhelm von Bode and the Relationship between Museums, Art Dealing and Private Collecting’, International Journal of Political Economy 25: 2 (1995), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecht, F. ‘Vor Eröffnung der ersten Münchener Jahres Ausstellung 1889’, Die Kunst für Alle 4: 19 (1889), 289–290.Google Scholar
Pennell, C. A Kingdom United: Popular Responses to the Outbreak of the First World War in Britain and Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Pennell, C. ‘Believing the Unbelievable: The Myth of the Russians with “Snow on Their Boots” in the United Kingdom, 1914’, Cultural and Social History 11: 1 (2014) 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzini, B. Making a Market for Art: Agnew’s and the National Gallery, 1855–1928, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2017.Google Scholar
Platschen, H. ‘Das Geschäft als Ästhetik oder die Ästhetik des Geschäfts. Über Kunsthandel und Kunsthändler’, Hochland. Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete des Wissens und der Schönen Künste 63: 2 (1971), 150–165.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Posani, G. (ed.). T. Tzara. Manifesti del Dadaismo e Lampisterie (Milano: Einaudi, 1975).Google Scholar
Prochasson, C. and Rasmussen, A. Au nom de la patrie. Les intellectuels et la première guerre mondiale (1910–1919) (Paris: La Découverte, 1996).Google Scholar
Protz, U. ‘National Treasures/ Trésors Nationaux’: The Control of the Export of Works of Art and the Construction of ‘National Heritage’. ‘Patrimoine’ in France and the United Kingdom, 1884–1959, unpublished PhD thesis, European University Institute, 2009.Google Scholar
Provenance. Follower of Hans Memling Virgin and Child, oil on wood, 27.3 × 21 cm (10.74 × 8.26 in), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Metmuseum.org online catalogue [www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/437062, accessed 2 March 2020].Google Scholar
Provenance, H. Raeburn. James Johnston of Straiton, oil on canvas, 35 ¼ × 27 ¼ (89.5 × 69 cm), Provenance, Metmuseum.org online catalogue [www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/437357, accessed 26 May 2021].Google Scholar
Provenance J. Bastien-Lepage. Poor Fauvette, 1881, oil on canvas, 162.5 × 125.7 cm, Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum 1323, Art UK database [https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/poor-fauvette-83144, accessed 26 May 2021]Google Scholar
Provenance, J. Reynolds. Lady Sarah Banbury Sacrificing to the Graces, 1763–1765, oil on canvas, 242.6 × 151.5 cm (95 ½ × 59 ¾ in), Art Institute Chicago 1922.4468, Art Institute Chicago online catalogue [www.artic.edu/artworks/4788/lady-sarah-bunbury-sacrificing-to-the-graces, accessed 26 May 2021].Google Scholar
Provenance, J. Tintoretto. Portrait of Ottavio Strada, 1567, oil on canvas, 128 × 101 cm (50 × 39 in), Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum.nl online catalogue, [www.rijksmuseum.nl/en/collection/SK-A-3902, accessed 3 March 2020]Google Scholar
Provenance, J. van Cleve. Self Portrait, 1519, 38 × 27 in (96.5 × 68.6 cm) Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid, RKD-Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis online database [https://rkd.nl/explore/images/42626, accessed 18 May 2021].Google Scholar
Provenance, L. Alma Tadema. Love’s Jewelled Fetter, Sotheby’s Object Report, European Art Auction, 22 May 2018, New York, Sotheby’s online auction catalogue [www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2018/european-art-n09869/lot.38.html, accessed 26 May 2021].Google Scholar
Provenance, V. van Gogh, First Steps after Millet, 1890, oil on canvas, 72.4 × 9.11 cm (28.5 × 3.58 in), Metropolitan Museum of Art 64.165; See Provenance, First Steps, after Millet, Metmuseum.org online catalogue [www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/436526, accessed 2 March 2020].Google Scholar
Przeworksi, A. and Limongi, F. ‘Modernization: Theories and Facts’, World Politics 49: 2 (1997), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quennouëlle-Corre, L. ‘The Decline of Paris as an International Financial Centre 1914–1940’, in Quennouëlle-Corre, L. and Cassis, Y. (eds), Financial Centres and International Capital Flows in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, A. ‘Mobilising Minds’, in Winter, J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees Leahy, H., ‘Art Exports and the Construction of National Heritage in Late Victorian and Edwardian Great Britain’, in Goodwin, C. D. W. and De Marchi, N. (eds), Economic Engagements with Art, History of Political Economy (Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1999), 187–208.Google Scholar
Reif, H. Adel, Aristokratie, Elite: Sozialgeschichte von Oben (Berlin: DeGruyter, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitlinger, G., The Economics of Taste: The Rise and Fall of Picture Prices, 1760–1960 (London: Barrie & Rockliff, 1961).Google Scholar
Riding, C., ‘The Raft of the Medusa in Britain’, in Noon, P. and Bann, S. (eds), Crossing the Channel: British and French Painting in the Age of Romanticism (London: Tate Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, F. E. ‘What Is a Market? On the Methodology of a Contested Concept’, Review of Social Economy 58: 4 (2000), 455–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouge Ducos, I. Le Crieur et le Marteau: Histoire des Commissaire-priseurs de Paris (1801–1945) (Paris: Bellin Litterature et Revues, 2013).Google Scholar
Rubinstein, D. W. Capitalism, Culture and Decline in Britain, 1750–1990 (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Sachko Macleod, D. Art and the Victorian Middle-Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sadmon, W. Z. Die Gründung des Technions in Haifa im Lichte deutscher Politik: 1907–1920 (Munich: K. G. Saur, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Raymond, L., de Maupeou, F., and Cavero, J. ‘Les rues des tableaux: The Geography of the Parisian Art Market 1815–1955’, Artl@s Bulletin 5: 1 (2016), 120–159.Google Scholar
Sargentson, C. Merchants and Luxury Markets: The Marchand Merciers of Eighteenth-Century Paris (London: V&A Publications, 1996).Google Scholar
Savoy, B. Patrimonie annexé: les biens saisis par la France an Allemagne autour de 1800 (Paris: Edition de la MSH /Centre allemand d’ histoire de l’ art, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoy, B. ‘Krieg, Wissenschaft und Recht: Napoleons Kunstraub in der deutschen Erinnerung um 1915’, Osteuropa. Kunst im Konflikt. Kriegsfolgen und Kooperationsgelder in Europa 56: 1/2 (2006), 205–221.Google Scholar
Savoy, B. Africa’s Struggle for Its Art: History of a Postcolonial Defeat (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Savoy, B. and Meyer, A. (eds), The Museum Is Open: Towards a Transnational History of Museums (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Schama, S. The Embarassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987).Google Scholar
Schweiger, J. W. ‘Das Kunstinteresse zu heben und auf bessere Wege zu leiten’ – Vom modernen Kunsthandel in der Zürich 1910–1938’, in Schweizerisches Institut für Kunstwissenschaft (ed.), Die Kunst zu Sammeln. Schweizer Kunstsammlungen seit 1848 (Zürich: SIK ISEA, 1998), 57–73.Google Scholar
Seave Greenwald, D. Painting by Numbers: Data-Driven Histories of Nineteenth-Century Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Seifried, S. C. and Novicevic, M. M. ‘The History of the Modernisation Construct: Tracing the Contribution of Business and Economic Historians’, Journal of Management History 23: 1 (2017), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. D. Worthy Monuments: Art Museums and the Politics of Culture in Nineteenth Century France (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shovlin, J. The Political Economy of Virtue Luxury, Patriotism, and the Origins of the French Revolution (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Siebrecht, C. The Aesthetics of Loss: German Women’s Art of the First World War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieder, R. ‘Behind the Lines: Working-class Family Life in Wartime Vienna’, in Wall, R. and Winter, J. (eds), The Upheaval of War: Family, Work and Welfare in Europe, 1914–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 109–139.Google Scholar
Silver, K. Esprit de Corps: The Art of the Parisian Avant-Garde and the First World War, 1914–1925 (Princeton: Princeton University Press and Thames and Hudson, 1989).Google Scholar
Singer, L. ‘Microeconomics of the Art Market’, Journal of Cultural Economics 6: 2 (1978), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D. and Miller, D. ‘Moments and Movements in the Study of Consumer Culture. A Discussion between Daniel Miller and Don Slater’, Journal of Consumer Culture 7: 1 (2007), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soutou, G. ‘La Première Guerre Mondiale: Une Rupture Dans l’évolution de l’ordre Européen.’ Politique Étrangère 65: 3/4 (2000), 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speck, C. ‘Picturing War’s Effects on the Homefront during the First World War’, in Murray, A. (ed.), Constructing the Memory of War in Visual Culture since 1914: The Eye on War, Routledge Research in Art and Politics (New York and London: Routledge, 2018), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammers, T. ‘Collectors, Catholics, and the Commune: Heritage and Counterrevolution, 1860–1890’, French Historical Studies 37: 1 (2014), 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammers, T. The Purchase of the Past: Collecting Culture in Post-Revolutionary Paris c. 1790–1890 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, P. J. ‘The Monetary Appreciation of Paintings’, Journal of Political Economy 85: 5 (1977), 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, A. ‘Staging Authenticity: Tourist Spaces and Artistic Inscription in Inter-war English Art’, Visual Culture in Britain 4: 1 (2003), 67–68.Google Scholar
Stephenson, A. ‘From Conscription to the Depression: The Market for Modern British Art in London, 1914–1930’, in Goulde, C. and Mesplède, S. (eds), Marketing Art in the British Isles, 1700 to the Present: A Cultural History (London: Ashgate, 2012), 75–86.Google Scholar
Stockhausen, von T. Gemäldegalerie Berlin. die Geschichte ihrer Erwerbungspolitik 1830–1904 (Berlin: Nicolai Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
Straus, A. ‘The Future of the Paris Market as an International Financial Centre from the Point of View of European Integration’, in Cassis, Y. and Bussière, E. (eds), London and Paris as International Financial Centres in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 1–18.Google Scholar
Strikwerda, C. ‘World War I in the History of Globalization’, Historical Reflections 42: 3 (2016), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobl, A. Curt Glaser. Kunsthistoriker – Kunstkritiker – Sammler. Eine deutsch-jüdische Biographie (Cologne: Böhlau, 2006).Google Scholar
Strobl, G. The Swastika and the Stage: German Theatre and Society, 1933–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Swenson, A. The Rise of Heritage: Preserving the Past in France, Germany, and England, 1789–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, A. ‘The First Heritage International(s): Conceptualizing Global Networks before UNESCO’, Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 13: 1 (2016), 1–15.Google Scholar
Tallier, A. P. ‘Archives de la Guerre, Série d’ inventaires, Fonds d’ archives relatifs aux réfugiés Belges aux Pays -Bas durant la Première Guerre Mondiale 1914–1922’, in Allgemein Rijksarchief Toegangen in Beperkte Oplage, Archives générales du Royaume instruments de recherche à tirage limité (Brussels: Royal Archives, 2002).Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. The New Transnational Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Taylor, B. J. ‘Staggered Price and Wage Setting in Macroeconomics’, in Taylor, J. B. and Woodford, M. (eds), Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2 vols., vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Thomson, R., and Thomson, B. ‘Maurice Denis’s “Définition du Néo-traditionnisme” and anti-naturalism (1890)’, The Burlington Magazine 154: 1309 (2012), 260–267.Google Scholar
Tomek, W. and Robinson, K. Agricultural Product Prices (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Turpin, A. ‘Appropriation as a Form of Nationalism? Collecting French Furniture in the Nineteenth Century’, in Baetens, D. and Lyna, D. (eds), Art Crossing Borders: The Internationalisation of the Art Market in the Age of Nation States, 1750–1914 (Leiden and New York: Brill, 2019), 220–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, P. H. ‘Finance’, in Winter, J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), vol. 3, 408–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaisse, P. M, ‘Annexe sur l’image du marchand de tableaux pendant le XIXe siècle’, Romantisme 40 (1983), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, O. Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Verhey, J. The Spirit of 1914: Militarism, Myth and Mobilization in Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkov, S. ‘Antisemitism as a Cultural Code: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Antisemitism in Imperial Germany’, in Marrus, M (ed.), The Nazi Holocaust, Part 2, The Origins of the Holocaust (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2011), 307–331.Google Scholar
Wang, F. V. ‘Whose Responsibility?’, International Journal of Cultural Property 15: 3 (2008), 227–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. ‘Bode and the British’, Jahrbuch der Berliner Museen 38 (1996), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. From Manet to Manhattan: The Rise of the Modern Art Market (London: Hutchinson, 1992).Google Scholar
Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds), ‘Comparison: Histories Croisée and the Challenge of Reflexivity’, History and Theory 45: 1 (2006), 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. Generation Dada: The Berlin Avant-Garde and the First World War (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
White, C. and White, H. Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Whiteley, L. ‘Art et commerce d’art en France avant l’époque impressionniste’, Romantisme 40 (1983), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitner, C. ‘“Picturing” World War I: German War Bond Posters and the Modern Public, in Murray, A. (ed.), Constructing the Memory of War in Visual Culture since 1914: The Eye on War (New York and London: Routledge, 2018), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney Kean, B. French Painters, Russian Collectors: The Merchant Patrons of Modern Art in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1994).Google Scholar
Whitney Kean, B. French Painters, Russian Collectors: The Merchant Patrons of Modern Art in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1994).Google Scholar
Widmer, D. ‘Sein Auge wachte überall’ Sigismund Righini und der Bundesberatsschluss vom 15 Juli 1921 über die Beschränkung der Einfuhr von Kunstgegenständen, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Zurich 1991.Google Scholar
Wimmer, D. ‘Bremen – Berlin – Weimar: Cooperation between German Art Collectors and Museum Directors c. 1900’, Journal of the History of Collections 21: 2 (2009), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, H. Geschichte des Westens. Die Zeit der Weltkriege (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J. ‘Cultural Mobilisation: Henry Moore and the Two World Wars’, in Pennell, C. and Ribeiro de Menenes, F. (eds), A World at War (1911–1949), Explorations in the Cultural History of War (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 17–41.Google Scholar
Winter, J. and Prost, A. (eds). The Generation of 1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Winter, J. and Robert, L. J. (eds). Capital Cities at War: A Cultural History: Paris, London, Berlin 1914–1919, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff-Thomsen, U. Die Wachsbüste einer Flora in der Berliner Skulpturensammlung und das System Wilhelm Bode (Kiel: Verlag Ludwig, 2006).Google Scholar
Wolff- Thomsen, U. and Kuhrau, S., Geschmacksgeschichte(n): Öffentliches und privates Kunstsammeln in Deutschland 1871–1933 (Kiel: Verlag Ludwig, 2011).Google Scholar
Yates, A. ‘Selling Paris: The Real Estate Market and Commercial Culture in the Fin-de-siècle Capital’, Enterprise & Society 13: 4 (2012), 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, V. ‘Circuits in Economic Life’, Economic Sociology. The European Electronic Newsletter 8: 1 (2006), 30–35.Google Scholar
Alma-Tadema, L. Love’s Jewelled Fetter (The Betrothal Ring), 1895, oil on panel, 25 × 17 ½ in (63.5 × 44.5 cm), private collection.Google Scholar
Atget, E. Boulevard de Strasbourg (1912), 23 × 17.9 cm, Getty Museum Collection 90.XM.64.20.Google Scholar
Baader, J. and Hausmann, R. Postcard to Hannah Höch (1 November 1919), Landesmuseum für Moderne Kunst, © ADAGP, Paris.Google Scholar
Bastien-Lepage, J. Poor Fauvette, 1881, oil on canvas, 162.5 × 125.7 cm, Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum 1323.Google Scholar
Cleve v. J. Self-portrait, 1519, 38 × 27 cm (96.5 × 68.6 in) Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid.Google Scholar
Da Firenze, A. The Virgin and Child with Saints and Angels, 1346–1379, 47 × 22 cm, Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) KMS3479.Google Scholar
Davringhausen, H. Der Schieber, oil on canvas, 1920–1921, 47 ¼ × 47 ¼ (120 × 120 cm), Los Angeles County Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Di Simone, P. The Virgin Swooning and the Three Maries at the Tomb of Christ, 1348, 21 × 39 cm, Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) KMS3756.Google Scholar
Follower of Hans Memling, Virgin and Child, oil on wood, 27.3 × 21 cm (10.74 × 8.26 in), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.Google Scholar
Goya y Lucientes, de F. Don Tomas Perez Estala, 1795 oil, 40.15 × 31.10 in (102 × 79 cm), Hamburger Kunsthalle HK 338.Google Scholar
Gromaire, M. The Plaster Cast Vendor, 1929, oil on canvas 102 × 81 cm, SMK Statens Museum for Kunst KMSr152.Google Scholar
Grosz, G. Querschnitt, Ecce Homo folio 83, 1922/23, 10 7/8 × 6 1/8 in (27.6 × 15.5 cm), The Louis E. Stern Collection, 854.1964.68.Google Scholar
Höch, H. Wilhelm II, Cut with the Kitchen Knife Dada Through the Last Weimar Beer-Belly Cultural Epoch of Germany, collage, mixed media, 1919–1920 (Nationalgalerie, Staatliche Museen, Berlin).Google Scholar
Höch, H. and Hausmann, R. Collage and Photomontage on a Test Print of the Magazine ‘Der Dada’ 1 (1919), Collage, 45.2 × 58.6 cm, Nachlass Hannah Höch, Berlinische Galerie, Museum für Moderne Kunst, BG-G 1722/79.Google Scholar
Holbein, S. Das Martyrium des Apostels Bartholomäus, ca 1504, oil on wood, 45.6 × 53.9 in (116 × 137 cm), Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden 1888 A.Google Scholar
Leibl, W. Der Maler Julius Bodenstein, 1876, Leinwand, 17.5 × 14.3 in (44.5 × 36.5 cm), Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus und Kunstbau München.Google Scholar
Maestro di Città di Castello, The Virgin and Child, 1305, Statens Museum for Kunst.Google Scholar
Maestro di Palazzo Venezia, St Victor of Siena, 1348, 158 × 47.5 cm, Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) KMS3625.Google Scholar
Manifest I, ‘The Style’, De Stijl 2: 1 (November 1918), 4.Google Scholar
Mattia, A. Portrait of Laura Chigi, 1646, 92.5 × 69 cm, Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) KMS3484.Google Scholar
Mc Evoy, A. Albert Charles Robinson Carter (1864–1957), oil on canvas, 124 × 98.5 cm, Bradford Museums and Galleries, 1958–002.Google Scholar
Raeburn, H. James Johnston of Straiton, oil on canvas, 35 ¼ × 27 ¼ (89.5 × 69.2 cm).Google Scholar
Raeburn, H. Lady Anne Moir, oil on canvas, 1780–1790, 99 × 80 cm (39 × 31.5 in), Tacoma Art Museum.Google Scholar
Renoir, P. Ambroise Vollard, 1908, oil on canvas, 81.6 × 65.2 cm, The Courtauld London, P.1932.SC.340.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. Lady Sarah Banbury Sacrificing to the Graces, 1763–1765, oil on canvas, 242.6 × 151.5 cm (95 ½ × 59 ¾ in), Art Institute Chicago 1922.4468.Google Scholar
Solario, A. The Christ Child Worshipped by Mary, 1480, 119 × 72.8 cm, Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) KMS3504.Google Scholar
Steen, J. Merry company around a new-born twin in an interior, 1668, oil on panel, 175.2 × 200 cm (69 × 79 in), Hamburger Kunsthalle.Google Scholar
Tintoretto, J. Portrait of Ottavio Strada, 1567, oil on canvas, 128 × 101 cm (50 × 39 in), Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Trübner, W. Blondine mit Hut und Pelz 1876, oil on canvas, 57.6 × 47 cm, Würzburg, Museum im Kulturspeicher.Google Scholar
Van der Waay, N. The Sale of the Camillo Castiglioni II Collection at Frederik Muller, Amsterdam, ca. 1925, oil on canvas, 29.5 × 39.4 in (75 × 100 cm).Google Scholar