Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T06:41:11.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

4 - Nature of EU external competence

Bart Van Vooren  and
Ramses A. Wessel
Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • Once it is established that competence for the Union to act exists, we must examine the impact this will have for the Member States’ ability to act internationally. This is the question of the ‘nature’ of EU competence, and is subdivided into two main categories according to how they impact the Member States’ powers: exclusive EU competence, or shared with the Member States.

  • In the category of exclusive competences, we distinguish between a priori exclusivity, conditional exclusivity and exclusivity through necessity. In the first instance, EU primary law expressly states that a given competence is to be exercised by the EU alone. In the case of conditional exclusivity, Member States are pre-empted from acting when their international action may affect common rules adopted by the EU. The third is a minor sub-category of conditional exclusivity.

  • In the category of shared competences we distinguish between: shared pre-emptive competences, shared non-pre-emptive (complementary) powers, supplementary powers and parallel powers. In each category the scope for the EU and the Member States to act alone or alongside each other differs, depending on the fulfilment of certain conditions. Much of this chapter is focused on the first category, namely the conditions under which the exercise of a shared competence will pre-empt Member State international action, and the legal justification given by the CJEU.

    • Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
     , pp. 99 - 137
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Bourgeois, J., ‘The EC in the WTO and Advisory Opinion 1/94: An Echternach Procession’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 763–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Collinson, D. S., ‘The Foreign Relations Powers of the European Communities: A Comment on Commission v. Council’ (1971) 23 Stanford Law Review 956–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., A Constitutional Basis for Effective External Action? An Assessment of the Provisions on EU External Action in the Constitutional Treaty (EUI Working Paper, 2006/30).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘Defining Competence in EU External Relations: Lessons from the Treaty Reform Process’, in Dashwood, A. and Maresceau, M. (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations – Salient Features of a Changing Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Attribution of External Relations Competence’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell 2000).Google Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Limits of European Community Powers’ (1996) 21 European Law Review 113–128.Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Emiliou, N., ‘Towards a Clearer Demarcation Line? The Division of External Relations Power between the Community and Member States’ (1996) 21 European Law Review 76–86.Google Scholar
    Ganshof Van der Meersch, W. J., ‘Les Relations Extérieures de la CEE dans le Domaine des Politiques Communes et l’Arrêt de la Cour de Justice du 31 Mars 1971’ (1972) Cahiers de Droit Européen 127–158.Google Scholar
    Hilf, M., ‘The ECJ’s Opinion 1/94 on the WTO – No Surprise, but Wise?’ (1995) 6 European Journal of International Law 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Hillion, C., ‘ERTA, ECHR and Open Skies: Laying the Grounds of the EU System of External Relations’, in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
    Holdgaard, R., External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar
    Holdgaard, R., ‘The European Community’s Implied External Competence after the Open Skies Cases’ (2003) 8 European Foreign Affairs Review 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Klamert, M. and Maydell, N., ‘Lost in Exclusivity: Implied Non-Exclusive External Competences in Community Law’ (2008) 13 European Foreign Affairs Review 493–513.Google Scholar
    Koutrakos, P., EU International Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., De Eerste Zaak ooit tussen de Commissie en de Raad. Het Recht van de Europese Unie in 50 Klassieke Arresten (The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2010).Google Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., ‘International Responsibility for EU Mixed Agreements’, in Hillion, C. and Koutrakos, P. (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited – The EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), pp. 208–227.Google Scholar
    MacLeod, I., Hendry, I. D. and Hyett, S., The External Relations of the European Communities (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
    Neuwahl, N., ‘Annotation: Opinion 2/91 (ILO Convention No 170)’ (1993) 30 Common Market Law Review 1185–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    O’Keeffe, D., ‘Exclusive, Concurrent and Shared Competence’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
    Pescatore, P., ‘External Relations in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities’ (1979) 16 Common Market Law Review 615–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Rosas, A., ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
    Schütze, R., From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Schütze, R., ‘Lisbon and the Federal Order of Competences: A Prospective Analysis’ (2008) 33 European Law Review 709–722.Google Scholar
    Schütze, R., ‘Supremacy without Pre-Emption? The Very Slowly Emergent Doctrine of Community Pre-Emption’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 1023–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Temple Lang, J., ‘The ERTA Judgment and the Court’s Case-Law on Competence and Conflict’ (1986) 6 Yearbook of European Law 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘The Principle of Pre-Emption after Opinion 1/2003 and Coherence in EU Readmission Policy’, in M. Cremona, J. Monar and S. Poli (eds.), The External Dimension of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (College of Europe Studies No. 13, 2011), pp. 163–190.Google Scholar
    Von Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J., ‘The European Union’s Vertical Order of Competences: The Current Law and Proposals for its Reform’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Waelbroeck, M., ‘L’Arrêt AETR et les Compétences Externes de la Communauté Économique Européenne’ (1971) Integration 79–89.Google Scholar
    Winter, J. A., ‘Casenote Case C-22/70’ (1971) 8 Common Market Law Review 550–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Limits of European Community Powers’ (1996) 21 European Law Review 113.Google Scholar
    Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 79.Google Scholar
    Rosas, A., ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’, in Dashwood, and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (Cambridge/London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000), p. 203.Google Scholar
    Neuwahl, N., ‘Annotation: Opinion 2/91 (ILO Convention No 170)’ (1993) 30 Common Market Law Review 1193.Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., A Constitutional Basis for Effective External Action? An Assessment of the Provisions on EU External Action in the Constitutional Treaty (EUI Working Paper, 2006/30), pp. 10–11 (emphasis added).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Schütze, R., ‘Lisbon and the Federal Order of Competences: A Prospective Analysis’ (2008) 33 European Law Review 714.Google Scholar
    Cremona, , ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cremona, , ‘Defining Competence in EU External Relations: Lessons from the Treaty Reform Process’, in Dashwood, and Maresceau, M. (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations – Salient Features of a Changing Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 62.Google Scholar
    Holdgaard, R., External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008), p. 105.Google Scholar
    Schütze, , ‘Supremacy without Pre-Emption? The Very Slowly Emergent Doctrine of Community Pre-Emption’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., ‘International Responsibility for EU Mixed Agreements’, in Hillion, and Koutrakos, P. (eds.), Mixed Agreements Revisited – The EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), p. 209.Google Scholar
    Koutrakos, , EU International Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006), p. 94 Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Klamert, M. and Maydell, N., ‘Lost in Exclusivity: Implied Non-Exclusive External Competences in Community Law’ (2008) 13 European Foreign Affairs Review, 493–513 at 503.Google Scholar
    Kuijper, , De Eerste Zaak ooit tussen de Commissie en de Raad. Het Recht van de Europese Unie in 50 Klassieke Arresten (Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2010), pp. 44–51Google Scholar
    Temple Lang, J., ‘The ERTA Judgment and the Court’s Case-Law on Competence and Conflict’ (1986) 6 Yearbook of European Law 183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Winter, J. A., ‘Casenote Case C-22/70’ (1971) 8 Common Market Law Review 550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Collinson, D. S., ‘The Foreign Relations Powers of the European Communities: A Comment on Commission v. Council’ (1971) 23 Stanford Law Review 956–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Waelbroeck, M., ‘L’Arrêt AETR et les Compétences Externes de la Communauté Économique Européenne’ (1971) Integration 79–89Google Scholar
    Ganshof Van der Meersch, W. J., ‘Les Relations Extérieures de la CEE dans le Domaine des Politiques Communes et l’Arrêt de la Cour de Justice du 31 Mars 1971’ (1972) Cahiers de Droit Européen 127–158.Google Scholar
    Hilf, M., ‘The ECJ’s Opinion 1/94 on the WTO – No Surprise, but Wise?’ (1995) 6 European Journal of International Law 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×