Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:48:41.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Navigating the Methodological Landscape: Ethnographic Data Expose the Nuances of “the Monkey Problem” in St. Kitts, West Indies

from Part II - Following the Data: Incorporating Ethnography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

Kerry M. Dore
Affiliation:
University of Texas, San Antonio
Erin P. Riley
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Agustín Fuentes
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ethnoprimatology
A Practical Guide to Research at the Human-Nonhuman Primate Interface
, pp. 219 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balée, W. (2006). The research program of historical ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 7598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Wasserman, M. D., Gillespie, T. R., et al. (2006). Do food availability, parasitism, and stress have synergistic effects on red colobus populations living in forest fragments? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 525534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppinger, R. P. & Maguire, J. P. (1980). Cercopithecus aethiops of St. Kitts: A population estimate based on human predation. Caribbean Journal of Science, 15, 17.Google Scholar
Cormier, L. A. (2006). A preliminary review of neotropical primates in the subsistence and symbolism of indigenous lowland South American peoples. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 1432.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1995). Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M. (2013). An anthropological investigation of the dynamic human–vervet monkey interface in St. Kitts, West Indies. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M. (in press). Vervets in the Caribbean. In Fuentes, A., Bezanson, M., Campbell, C. J., et al. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Primatology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M., Sewell, D., Mattenet, E., & Turner, T. R. (in press). GIS and GPS techniques in an ethnoprimatological investigation of St. Kitts vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) crop-raiding behavior. In Shaffer, C. A., Dolins, F., Hickey, J. R., et al. (eds.) GIS and GPS in Primatology: A Practical Guide to Spatial Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fish, K. D., Sauther, M. L., Loudon, J. E., & Cuozzo, F. P. (2007). Coprophagy by wild ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) in human-disturbed locations adjacent to the Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2006). Human–nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2(2), 111.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human–primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. & Hockings, K. (2010). The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 841847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, A. & Wolfe, L. (2002). Primates Face to Face: Conservation Implications of Human–Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, P. C. (1999). The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation, 26, 218228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, P. C. (2003). People and protected areas: A study of local perceptions of wildlife crop-damage conflict in an area bordering the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oryx, 3, 316325.Google Scholar
Heatherington, T. (2012). Environmental anthropology. In Jackson, J. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies Online: Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, C. M. (1997). Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: The farmer’s perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management, 43, 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. (1998). Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo forest reserve, Uganda. Environmental Conservation, 25, 244250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. (2000). Conflict of interest between people and baboons: Crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. (2004). Farmers’ perspectives of conflict at the wildlife–agriculture boundary: Some lessons learned from African subsistence farmers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 279286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. & Webber, A. D. (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 919924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, J. (2000). Introduction. In Knight, J. (ed.) Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective. London: Routledge, 135.Google Scholar
Kottak, C. P. (1999). The new ecological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 101(1), 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. C. (2010). Sharing space: Can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology, 72, 925931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. C. & Priston, N. E. C. (2005). Human attitudes to primates: Perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. In Paterson, J. D. & Wallis, J. (eds.) Primate–Human Interaction and Conservation. Alberta: American Society of Primatologists Publications, 123.Google Scholar
Lee, P. C., Brennan, E. J., Else, J. G., & Altmann, J. (1986). Ecology and behaviour of vervet monkeys in a tourist lodge habitat. In Else, J. G. & Lee, P. C. (eds.) Primate Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229235.Google Scholar
Lizarralde, M. (2002). Ethnoecology of monkeys among the Bari of Venezuela: Perception, use and conservation. In Fuentes, A. & Wolfe, L. D. (eds.) Primates Face to Face: The Conservation Implications of Human and Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loudon, J. E., Sauther, M. L., Fish, K. D., Hunter-Ishikawa, M., & Ibrahim, Y. J. (2006). One reserve, three primates: Applying a holistic approach to understand the interconnections among ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), Verreaux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi), and humans (Homo sapiens) at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagasar. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2(2), 5474.Google Scholar
Maples, W. R., Maples, M. K., Greenhood, W. F., & Walek, M. L. (1976). Adaptations of crop-raiding baboons in Kenya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45, 309316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. T. (1974). The St. Kitts Vervet. New York: Karger.Google ScholarPubMed
Musau, J. M. & Strum, S. C. (1984). Response of wild baboon troops to incursion of agriculture at Gilgil, Kenya. International Journal of Primatology, 5, 364.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1997). Farming the forest edge: Vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review, 87, 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1998). Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 12, 156169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L., Treves, A., Chapman, C., & Wrangham, R. (1998). Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: Linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 596606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W. D., Manyanza, D. N., Gamassa, D.-G. M., & Sariko, H. I. (1994). The conflict between wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: Human density as a predictor. Conservation Biology, 8, 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, J. D. & Wallis, J. (2005). Commensalism and Conflict: The Primate–Human Interface. Norman, OK: American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar
Poirier, F. E. (1972). The St. Kitts green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): Ecology, population dynamics, and selected behavioral traits. Folia Primatologica, 17, 2055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priston, N. E. C. (2005). Crop raiding by Macaca ochreata brunnescens in Sulawesi: Reality, perceptions and outcomes for conservation. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge. Available at: www.nancypriston.co.uk/publications/phd (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Priston, N. E. C. (2008). Modeling primate crop-raiding: Perceptions of risk, actual risk, and the implications for conservation. PSGB Conservation Grant Report. Available at: www.psgb.org/Conservation/documents/Nancy%20Preston%20Final%20Feb-09.pdf (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Remis, M. J. (2000). Preliminary assessment of the impacts of human activities on gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and other wildlife at Dzanga-Sangha Reserve, Central African Republic. Oryx, 34, 5665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2007). The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 109(3): 473484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2013). Contemporary primatology in anthropology: Beyond the epistemological abyss. American Anthropologist, 115, 411422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. & Fuentes, A. (2011). Conserving social-ecological systems in Indonesia: Human–nonhuman primate interconnections in Bali and Sulawesi. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 6274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, E. P. & Priston, N. E. C. (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 848854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85109. Available at: http://nersp.osg.ufl.edu/~ufruss/documents/ryan%20and%20bernard%20themes.%20FM%2015(1).pdf (accessed August 28, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sade, D. S. & Hildrech, R. W. (1965). Notes on the green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) on St. Kitts, West Indies. Caribbean Journal of Science, 5, 6781.Google Scholar
Saj, T. L., Sicotte, P., & Paterson, J. D. (1999). Influence of human food consumption on the time budget of vervets. International Journal of Primatology, 20, 977994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanjek, R. (1990). Field Notes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, R., Romero, L. M., & Munch, A. U. (2000). How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory and preparative actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 5589.Google ScholarPubMed
Siex, K. S. & Struhsaker, T. T. (1999). Colobus monkeys and coconuts: A study of perceived human–wildlife conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 10091020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitati, N. W., Walpole, M. J., Smith, R. J., & Leader-Williams, N. (2003). Predicting spatial aspects of human–elephant conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 667677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sponsel, L. E. (1997). The human niche in Amazonia: Explorations in ethnoprimatology. In Kinzey, W. G. (ed.) New World Primates. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 111159.Google Scholar
Strum, S. C. (1994). Prospects for managing primate pests. Revue d’Ecologie: La Terre et la Vie, 49, 295306.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×