Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: climate change and ethics
- 1 Energy, ethics, and the transformation of nature
- 2 Is no one responsible for global environmental tragedy? Climate change as a challenge to our ethical concepts
- 3 Greenhouse gas emission and the domination of posterity
- 4 Climate change, energy rights, and equality
- 5 Common atmospheric ownership and equal emissions entitlements
- 6 A Lockean defense of grandfathering emission rights
- 7 Parenting the planet
- 8 Living ethically in a greenhouse
- 9 Beyond business as usual: alternative wedges to avoid catastrophic climate change and create sustainable societies
- 10 Addressing competitiveness in US climate policy
- 11 Reconciling justice and efficiency: integrating environmental justice into domestic cap-and-trade programs for controlling greenhouse gases
- 12 Ethical dimensions of adapting to climate change-imposed risks
- 13 Does nature matter? The place of the nonhuman in the ethics of climate change
- 14 Human rights, climate change, and the trillionth ton
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
9 - Beyond business as usual: alternative wedges to avoid catastrophic climate change and create sustainable societies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2011
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: climate change and ethics
- 1 Energy, ethics, and the transformation of nature
- 2 Is no one responsible for global environmental tragedy? Climate change as a challenge to our ethical concepts
- 3 Greenhouse gas emission and the domination of posterity
- 4 Climate change, energy rights, and equality
- 5 Common atmospheric ownership and equal emissions entitlements
- 6 A Lockean defense of grandfathering emission rights
- 7 Parenting the planet
- 8 Living ethically in a greenhouse
- 9 Beyond business as usual: alternative wedges to avoid catastrophic climate change and create sustainable societies
- 10 Addressing competitiveness in US climate policy
- 11 Reconciling justice and efficiency: integrating environmental justice into domestic cap-and-trade programs for controlling greenhouse gases
- 12 Ethical dimensions of adapting to climate change-imposed risks
- 13 Does nature matter? The place of the nonhuman in the ethics of climate change
- 14 Human rights, climate change, and the trillionth ton
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
There is a curious disconnect in climate change discourse, between explanations of the causes of global climate change (GCC) and discussions of possible solutions. On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that the primary causes of climate change are unremitting economic and demographic growth. As the Fourth Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) succinctly puts it: “GDP/per capita and population growth were the main drivers of the increase in global emissions during the last three decades of the 20th century … At the global scale, declining carbon and energy intensities have been unable to offset income effects and population growth and, consequently, carbon emissions have risen.” On the other hand, most proposals for climate change mitigation take growth for granted and focus on technical means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Climate scientists speak of the “Kaya identity”: the four primary factors which determine overall greenhouse gas emissions. They are economic growth/per capita, population, energy used to generate each unit of GDP, and greenhouse gases generated per unit of energy. Over the past three and a half decades, improvements in energy and carbon efficiency have been overwhelmed by increases in population and wealth.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ethics of Global Climate Change , pp. 192 - 215Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
et al., The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005).Google Scholar
, Shoveling Fuel for a Runaway Train: Errant Economists, Shameful Spenders, and a Plan to Stop them All (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar
, The Bridge at the Edge of the World: Capitalism, the Environment, and Crossing from Crisis to Sustainability (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
, Don't Get Burned: The Risks of Investing in New Coal-Fired Generating Facilities (New York: Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2008), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
, “Scientific Reticence and Sea Level Rise,” Environmental Research Letters, 2 (2) (2007)Google Scholar
et al., “Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?,” Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2 (2008), pp. 217–231.Google Scholar
, “Duties to Endangered Species,” in , Philosophy Gone Wild: Environmental Ethics (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989), pp. 206–219.Google Scholar
, “Can Advances in Science and Technology Prevent Global Warming? A Critical Review of Limitations and Challenges,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11 (2006), p. 566.Google Scholar
, Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future (New York: Henry Holt, 2007).Google Scholar
, , and , “The Fat of the Land: Linking American Food Overconsumption, Obesity, and Biodiversity Loss,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19 (2006), pp. 541–561.Google Scholar
Global Warning: Climate Change and Farm Animal Welfare from the group Compassion in World Farming (Godalming, UK: 2007).
and , “International Aviation Emissions to 2025: Can Emissions Be Stabilized Without Restricting Demand?” Energy Policy, 37 (2009), pp. 264–273.Google Scholar
, “Climate Change and Population Growth,” in (ed.), A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice and the Environmental Challenge (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2009), pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
, Too Many People: The Case for Reversing Growth (Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press, 2001).Google Scholar
, “Population, Carbon Emissions, and Global Warming: The Forgotten Relationship at Kyoto,” Population and Development Review, 24 (1998), pp. 115–130Google Scholar
et al., Making the Case for U.S. International Family Planning Assistance (New York: Population Connection, 2009).Google Scholar
, “Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth and the Environment,” in (ed.), The Future of Sustainability (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar
, “Cairo and Climate Change: A Win/Win Opportunity,” Global Environmental Change, 10 (2000), pp. 93–96.Google Scholar
, “Globalisation, Population, Ecology and Conflict,” Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 18 (2007), p. 87.Google Scholar
, Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost: Reducing Future Carbon Emissions by Investing in Family Planning: A Cost/Benefit Analysis (London School of Economics, 2009).Google Scholar
et al., Draft Report (Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, 2009).Google Scholar
, Living Within Limits: Ecology, Economics, and the Population Taboos (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, Prosperity Without Growth? The Transition to a Sustainable Economy (European Union Sustainable Development Commission: 2009), p. 57.Google Scholar
and , For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989)Google Scholar
(ed.), Voluntary Simplicity: The Poetic Alternative to Consumer Culture (Whanganui, New Zealand: Stead & Daughters, 2009).
, “Thoreau, Leopold and Carson: Toward an Environmental Virtue Ethics,” Environmental Ethics, 23 (2001), pp. 3–17Google Scholar
, “Beyond the Climate Crisis: A Critique of Climate Change Discourse,” Telos, 141 (2007), pp. 29–55.Google Scholar
and , “The Virtue of Simplicity,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23 (2010), pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
- 17
- Cited by