Beyond business as usual: alternative wedges to avoid catastrophic climate change and create sustainable societies

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511732294.010

9 - Beyond business as usual: alternative wedges to avoid catastrophic climate change and create sustainable societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2011

Philip Cafaro

Edited by

Denis G. Arnold

Show author details

Philip Cafaro: Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Denis G. Arnold: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Book contents

Get access

Summary

There is a curious disconnect in climate change discourse, between explanations of the causes of global climate change (GCC) and discussions of possible solutions. On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that the primary causes of climate change are unremitting economic and demographic growth. As the Fourth Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) succinctly puts it: “GDP/per capita and population growth were the main drivers of the increase in global emissions during the last three decades of the 20th century … At the global scale, declining carbon and energy intensities have been unable to offset income effects and population growth and, consequently, carbon emissions have risen.” On the other hand, most proposals for climate change mitigation take growth for granted and focus on technical means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Climate scientists speak of the “Kaya identity”: the four primary factors which determine overall greenhouse gas emissions. They are economic growth/per capita, population, energy used to generate each unit of GDP, and greenhouse gases generated per unit of energy. Over the past three and a half decades, improvements in energy and carbon efficiency have been overwhelmed by increases in population and wealth.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Ethics of Global Climate Change , pp. 192 - 215

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732294.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Walter, Reidet al., The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Brian, Czech, Shoveling Fuel for a Runaway Train: Errant Economists, Shameful Spenders, and a Plan to Stop them All (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Gustave, Speth, The Bridge at the Edge of the World: Capitalism, the Environment, and Crossing from Crisis to Sustainability (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

,Synapse Energy Economics, Don't Get Burned: The Risks of Investing in New Coal-Fired Generating Facilities (New York: Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2008), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

James, Hansen, “Scientific Reticence and Sea Level Rise,” Environmental Research Letters, 2 (2) (2007)Google Scholar

James, Hansenet al., “Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?,” Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2 (2008), pp. 217–231.Google Scholar

Holmes, Rolston, “Duties to Endangered Species,” in Rolston, , Philosophy Gone Wild: Environmental Ethics (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989), pp. 206–219.Google Scholar

Chris, Thomaset al., “Extinction Risk from Climate Change,” Nature, 427 (2004), pp. 145–148Google Scholar

Michael, Huesemann, “Can Advances in Science and Technology Prevent Global Warming? A Critical Review of Limitations and Challenges,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11 (2006), p. 566.Google Scholar

Bill, McKibben, Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future (New York: Henry Holt, 2007).Google Scholar

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options (Rome: 2006), p. 112.Google Scholar

Gidon, Eshel and Pamela, Martin, “Diet, Energy, and Global Warming,” Earth Interactions, 10 (2006), paper no. 9.Google Scholar

Philip, Cafaro, Richard, Primack, and Robert, Zimdahl, “The Fat of the Land: Linking American Food Overconsumption, Obesity, and Biodiversity Loss,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19 (2006), pp. 541–561.Google Scholar

Bernard, Rollin, Animal Rights and Human Morality, 3rd edn. (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 2006)Google Scholar

Global Warning: Climate Change and Farm Animal Welfare from the group Compassion in World Farming (Godalming, UK: 2007).

Andrew, Macintosh and Lailey, Wallace, “International Aviation Emissions to 2025: Can Emissions Be Stabilized Without Restricting Demand?” Energy Policy, 37 (2009), pp. 264–273.Google Scholar

Brian, O'Neill, Landis, MacKellar, and Wolfgang, Lutz, Population and Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Brian, O'Neill, “Climate Change and Population Growth,” in Mazur, Laurie (ed.), A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice and the Environmental Challenge (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2009), pp. 81–94.Google Scholar

Lindsey, Grant, Too Many People: The Case for Reversing Growth (Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Frederick, Meyerson, “Population, Carbon Emissions, and Global Warming: The Forgotten Relationship at Kyoto,” Population and Development Review, 24 (1998), pp. 115–130Google Scholar

Joseph, Speidelet al., Making the Case for U.S. International Family Planning Assistance (New York: Population Connection, 2009).Google Scholar

Albert, Bartlett, “Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth and the Environment,” in Keiner, Marco (ed.), The Future of Sustainability (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar

Brian, O'Neill, “Cairo and Climate Change: A Win/Win Opportunity,” Global Environmental Change, 10 (2000), pp. 93–96.Google Scholar

Colin, Butler, “Globalisation, Population, Ecology and Conflict,” Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 18 (2007), p. 87.Google Scholar

Thomas, Wire, Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost: Reducing Future Carbon Emissions by Investing in Family Planning: A Cost/Benefit Analysis (London School of Economics, 2009).Google Scholar

Joseph, Stiglitzet al., Draft Report (Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, 2009).Google Scholar

Garrett, Hardin, Living Within Limits: Ecology, Economics, and the Population Taboos (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Tim, Jackson, Prosperity Without Growth? The Transition to a Sustainable Economy (European Union Sustainable Development Commission: 2009), p. 57.Google Scholar

Herman, Daly and John, Cobb, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Alexander, Samuel (ed.), Voluntary Simplicity: The Poetic Alternative to Consumer Culture (Whanganui, New Zealand: Stead & Daughters, 2009).

Philip, Cafaro, “Thoreau, Leopold and Carson: Toward an Environmental Virtue Ethics,” Environmental Ethics, 23 (2001), pp. 3–17Google Scholar

Eileen, Crist, “Beyond the Climate Crisis: A Critique of Climate Change Discourse,” Telos, 141 (2007), pp. 29–55.Google Scholar

Joshua, Gambrel and Philip, Cafaro, “The Virtue of Simplicity,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23 (2010), pp. 85–108.Google Scholar