Postcolonial theory has opened up new spaces and possibilities for interpretation in many disciplines, including medieval studies. One text that has received a considerable degree of such attention in the last twenty years is the fourteenth-century alliterative poem, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. In this viewpoint, the narrative justifies English colonialism through Arthur over Welsh subjects like Bertilak/ The Green Knight, wherein ‘Welshness’ signifies barbarity, treachery, and monstrosity. In this approach, it is often taken for granted that when the poet describes the land Gawain is venturing through as being infested with various monsters, he is describing Wales, and suggesting that Welsh people are barbaric. And yet, as other scholars have pointed out, Hautdesert is not located in Wales at all. One consequence of this postcolonial framework is that it can posit a unified, top-down colonizer/ colonized framework that does not manifest clearly in the poem, and has the implication of obfuscating the contests of lordly power that the poem is invested in. In this essay, I suggest we can more productively examine the political ethics of lordship at the heart of the poem by situating it in the context of the March of Wales, a fluid, and multicultural border region commanded by lords with considerable autonomy, wherein the writ of the king of England did not hold sway. Such Marcher lords could be antagonistic toward royal lordship, particularly when it encroached upon their customary rights. In attending to this unique context, we shall see that in the poet's framing of Bertilak as a Marcher lord, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight draws our attention to Bertilak/The Green Knight's good lordship and his regal qualities. In positioning Bertilak/The Green Knight in this way, the poet reveals the political ethics of lordship through his confrontation with Arthur and his interactions with Gawain, which illustrates the often-conflicted relations between Marcher lords and English kings in the later Middle Ages.

While lordship in the Middle Ages was exploitative as a matter of course, medieval people understood the difference between good lordship and bad lordship.