Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:38:00.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Prosecutors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

W. Bradley Wendel
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories.

Anyone who has turned on a television set in the past twenty years, anywhere in the English-speaking world, has heard the voiceover introduction of the long-running and endlessly replayed series Law and Order. (Admit it – you heard the “chung CHUNG” sound in your head when you read those lines.) But notice something strange in those familiar words: The people are represented by prosecuting attorneys. The assistant district attorneys shown investigating the facts, talking to witnesses, and trying cases in the courtroom have a boss – an elected or appointed political official – but, in theory, their client is an abstraction called “the people” or, in Commonwealth countries, the Crown. Criminal cases in these nations are captioned R v. Defendant, with the “R” standing for Rex or Regina – king or queen. Prosecutors claim to act in the name of the sovereign or society as a whole, seeking to punish offenses against the common good. That makes them different from most other lawyers who work on behalf of an identifiable client whose interests may differ from the common good. Although in theory they represent the public interest, prosecutors are employed by the state. All lawyers are, in principle, “officers of the court,” meaning that their authority is derived in some way from that of the judicial system. Prosecutors are, in addition, subject to the direction of government officials. In most common law countries, the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Crown Attorney is an appointed position. (As in so many things, the United States is an outlier, and the chief prosecutor in many cities and counties is an elected office.) Just as lawyers representing a corporation in principle represent the shareholders acting through an elected board of directors, prosecuting attorneys represent all citizens, acting through some combination of elected and appointed political officials.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Law
An Introduction
, pp. 156 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Code, Michael, “Ethics and Criminal Law Practice,” in Woolley, Alice et al., eds., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008)Google Scholar
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963)
Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 88 (1935)
Simon, William H., The Practice of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1998), p. 2Google Scholar
R. v. Boucher, [1954] S.C.J. No. 54, 110 C.C.C. 263 at 272 (internal quotations, citations, and alterations omitted)
Woolley, Alice, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2011), pp. 278–80Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Character and Context: What Virtue Theory Can Teach Us About a Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to ‘Seek Justice,’Notre Dame Law Review 82: 635–97 (2006)Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Some Reflections on Ethics and Plea Bargaining: An Essay in Honor of Fred Zacharias,” San Diego Law Review 48: 93–110, p. 95
Butler, Paul, “How Can You Prosecute Those People?,” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), p. 16Google Scholar
Coates, Ta-Nehisi, “The Gangs of Chicago,” The Atlantic (Dec. 18, 2013)Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. v. Williams, 504 U. S. 36 (1992)
Kramer, Marcia and Lombardi, Frank, “New Top State Judge: Abolish Grand Juries and Let Us Decide,” New York Daily News (January 31, 1985)Google Scholar
U.S. v. Batchelder, 442 U. S. 114 (1979)
Loo, Dennis D. and Grimes, Ruth-Ellen M., “Polls, Politics, and Crime: The ‘Law and Order’ Issue of the 1960s,” Western Criminology Review 5: 50–67 (2004)Google Scholar
Johnston, David, A Brief History of Justice (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell 2011), pp. 76–77 (discussing Aristotle’s theory of corrective justice)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Herbert, “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52: 475–501 (1968), p. 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Incorporation by Law,” Legal Theory 10: 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David, “The Conscience of a Prosecutor,” Valparaiso University Law Review 45: 1–31 (2010)Google Scholar
Cohen, Steven M., “What Is True? Perspectives of a Former Prosecutor,” Cardozo Law Review 23: 817–28 (2002)Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished,” Washington Post (Dec. 23, 2013)Google Scholar
Bamford, James, “They Know Much More Than You Think,” New York Review of Books (Aug. 15, 2013)Google Scholar
Bazelon, Emily, “Playing Dirty in the Big Easy,” Slate (Apr. 18, 2012)Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (New York: Random House 2008)Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farar, Straus & Giroux 2011), pp. 252–58Google Scholar
Weiser, Benjamin, “Doubting Case, a Prosecutor Helped the Defense,” New York Times (Jun. 23, 2008)Google Scholar
Levin, Yuval, The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left (New York: Basic Books 2014)Google Scholar
Simon, William H., “Authoritarian Legal Ethics: Bradley Wendel and the Positivist Turn,” Texas Law Review 90: 709–26 (2012), pp. 711–12Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Prosecutors
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Prosecutors
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Prosecutors
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.011
Available formats
×