Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:09:41.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

Sarah Parkhouse
Sarah Parkhouse
Affiliation:
Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Eschatology and the Saviour
The 'Gospel of Mary' among Early Christian Dialogue Gospels
 , pp. 263 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Bury, R. G., trans. Plato: Timaeus. Critias. Cleitophon. Menexenus. Epistles. LCL 234. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N., trans. Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. LCL 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N.. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi Section: Textes. 38 vols., Québec and Louvain: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1977–2019.Google Scholar
Kasser, Rodolphe, and Wurst, Gregor. The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos. Washington, DC: National Geographic, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M. The Coptic Gnostic Library. 5 vols., NHS, Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar
Carl, Schmidt. Pistis Sophia. Translated by MacDermot, Violet. NHMS 4. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Dennis D. Your Eyes Will Be Opened: A Study of the Greek (Ethiopic) Apocalypse of Peter. SBLDS 97. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. ‘The Apocalypse of Peter’. Pages 593–612 in The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kraus, Thomas J., and Nicklas, Tobias. Das Petrusevangelium und die Petrusapokalypse: Die griechischen Fragmente mit deutscher und englischer Übersetzung. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. ‘The Epistle of the Apostles (Epistula Apostolorum)’. Pages 555–88 in The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Guerrier, Louis (with Sylvain Grébaut). Le Testament en Galilée de Notre-Seigneur Jésus-Christ. Patrologia Orientalis. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1913; repr. Turnhout: Brepols, 1982.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Carl, and Wajnberg, Isaak. Gespräche Jesu mit seinen Jüngern nach der Auferstehung; ein katholisch-apostolisches Sendschreiben des 2. Jahrhunderts. TU 43. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1919.Google Scholar
Bardy, Gustave, ed., Jean, Sender, trans., Théophile d’Antioche: Trois Livres à Autolycus. SC 20. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1948.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. ed. The Apostolic Fathers. LCL 24. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Irenaeus. ‘Against the Heresies (Detection and Overthrow of Gnosis Falsely So- Called)’. Pages 41–141 in Grant, Robert M.. Irenaeus of Lyons. The Early Church Fathers. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Irenaeus. Irénée de Lyon, Contre les hérésies, Livre 1. Edited and translated by Rousseau, Adelin and Doutreleau, Louis. 2 vols. SC 263–264. Paris: du Cerf, 1979.Google Scholar
Minns, Denis, and Parvis, Paul, eds. Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. OECT. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Bury, R. G., trans. Plato: Timaeus. Critias. Cleitophon. Menexenus. Epistles. LCL 234. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N., trans. Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. LCL 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N.. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi Section: Textes. 38 vols., Québec and Louvain: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1977–2019.Google Scholar
Kasser, Rodolphe, and Wurst, Gregor. The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos. Washington, DC: National Geographic, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M. The Coptic Gnostic Library. 5 vols., NHS, Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar
Carl, Schmidt. Pistis Sophia. Translated by MacDermot, Violet. NHMS 4. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Dennis D. Your Eyes Will Be Opened: A Study of the Greek (Ethiopic) Apocalypse of Peter. SBLDS 97. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. ‘The Apocalypse of Peter’. Pages 593–612 in The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kraus, Thomas J., and Nicklas, Tobias. Das Petrusevangelium und die Petrusapokalypse: Die griechischen Fragmente mit deutscher und englischer Übersetzung. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. ‘The Epistle of the Apostles (Epistula Apostolorum)’. Pages 555–88 in The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Guerrier, Louis (with Sylvain Grébaut). Le Testament en Galilée de Notre-Seigneur Jésus-Christ. Patrologia Orientalis. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1913; repr. Turnhout: Brepols, 1982.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Carl, and Wajnberg, Isaak. Gespräche Jesu mit seinen Jüngern nach der Auferstehung; ein katholisch-apostolisches Sendschreiben des 2. Jahrhunderts. TU 43. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1919.Google Scholar
Bardy, Gustave, ed., Jean, Sender, trans., Théophile d’Antioche: Trois Livres à Autolycus. SC 20. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1948.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. ed. The Apostolic Fathers. LCL 24. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Irenaeus. ‘Against the Heresies (Detection and Overthrow of Gnosis Falsely So- Called)’. Pages 41–141 in Grant, Robert M.. Irenaeus of Lyons. The Early Church Fathers. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Irenaeus. Irénée de Lyon, Contre les hérésies, Livre 1. Edited and translated by Rousseau, Adelin and Doutreleau, Louis. 2 vols. SC 263–264. Paris: du Cerf, 1979.Google Scholar
Minns, Denis, and Parvis, Paul, eds. Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. OECT. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Adams, Edward. Constructing the World: A Study in Paul’s Cosmological Language. Studies of the New Testament and Its World. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar
Adams, Edward. The Stars Will Fall from Heaven: Cosmic Catastrophe in the New Testament and Its World. Library of New Testament Studies 347. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Adams, Sean A. The Genre of Acts and Collected Biography. SNTSMS 156. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ashton, John. Understanding the Fourth Gospel. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ashton, John. ‘The Transformation of Wisdom: A Study of the Prologue of John’s Gospel’. NTS 32.2 (1986): 161–86.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. ‘Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel’. JBL 121.1 (2002): 3–21.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. ‘“Let Us Strive to Enter That Rest”: The Logic of Hebrews 4:1–11’. HTR 73.1–2 (1980): 279–88.Google Scholar
Baird, William. ‘Visions, Revelation, and Ministry: Reflections on 2 Cor 12:1–5 and Gal 1:11–17’. JBL 104.4 (1985): 651–62.Google Scholar
Bass, Ardyth L. ‘Composition and Redaction in the Coptic Gospel of Mary’. Milwaukee, WI: PhD Thesis, Marquette University, 2007.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. ‘Pseudo-Apostolic Letters’. JBL 107.3 (1988): 469–94.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. New Testament Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. ‘The Two Fig Tree Parables in the Apocalypse of Peter’. JBL 104.2 (1985): 269–87.Google Scholar
Beasley-Murray, George Raymond. Jesus and the Kingdom of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986.Google Scholar
Beavis, Mary Ann. Mark’s Audience: The Literary and Social Setting of Mark 4.11–12. JSNTSup 33. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Beavis, Mary Ann. ‘The Power of Jesus’ Parables: Were They Polemical or Irenic?’ JSNT 82 (2001): 3–30.Google Scholar
Bernabé, Alberto, and Cristóbal, Ana Isabel Jiménez San. Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 162. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Bieringer, Reimund. ‘“I Am Ascending to My Father and Your Father, to My God and Your God” (John 20:17): Resurrection and Ascension in the Gospel of John’. Pages 209–35 in The Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospel of John. Edited by Koester, Helmut and Bieringer, Reimund, WUNT I 222. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell L. Luke 2: 9:51–24:53. BECNT. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1996.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. Ancient Apocryphal Gospels. Interpretation. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2017.Google Scholar
de Boer, Esther A. ‘A Stoic Reading of the Gospel of Mary: The Meaning of “Matter” and “Nature” in the Gospel of Mary 7.1–8.11’. Pages 199–219 in Stoicism in Early Christianity. Edited by Rasimus, Tuomas, Troels Engberg-Pedersen, and Ismo Dunderberg. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar
de Boer, Esther A. The Gospel of Mary: Listening to the Beloved Disciple. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. Kyrios Christos: A History of the Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus. Translated by Steely, John E.. 5th ed. Nashville, TN and New York: Abingdon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. ‘Fragment Oxyrhynchus 840, Fragment of a Lost Gospel, Witness of an Early Christian Controversy over Purity’. JBL 119.4 (2000): 705–28.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. Luke 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51–19:27. Edited by Koester, Helmut. Translated by Deer, Donald S.. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Brakke, David. The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Brakke, David. ‘Parables and Plain Speech in the Fourth Gospel and the Apocryphon of James’. JECS 7.2 (1999): 187–218.Google Scholar
Brakke, David. Talking Back: A Monastic Handbook for Combating Demons. Cistercian Studies Series 229 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2009), 1–40.Google Scholar
Brayford, Susan. Genesis. Septuagint Commentary Series. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan N. ‘Descents to Hell and Ascents to Heaven in Apocalyptic Literature’. Pages 340–57 in The Oxford Handbook of Apocalyptic Literature. Edited by Collins, John J.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brock, Ann Graham. Mary Magdalene, The First Apostle: The Struggle for Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel According to John, XIII–XXI. ABRL. New York: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel and Epistles of John: A Concise Commentary. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. ‘The Paraclete in the Fourth Gospel’. NTS 13.2 (1967): 113–32.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus. New York: Paulist Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Burkett, Delbert. The Son of Man Debate: A History and Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Burkitt, F. C. ‘Pistis Sophia Again’. JTS 26.104 (1925): 391–9.Google Scholar
Burridge, Richard A. What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. SNTSMS 70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Burridge, Richard A. ‘Who Writes, Why, and for Whom?’ Pages 99–115 in The Written Gospel. Edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Hagner, D. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Ron. The Other Gospels: Non-Canonical Gospel Texts. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster John Knox Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. ‘An Introduction to Genre Theory’, 2000 [1997], 1. Available from http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Cosmology and Eschatology in Jewish and Christian Apocalypticism. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 50. Edited by Collins, John J.. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. ‘Introduction: Towards the Morphology of a Genre’. Semeia 14 (1979): 1–20.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F. Second Corinthians. Paideia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Colpe, C. ‘Die “Himmelsreise der Seele” ausserhalb und innerhalb der Gnosis’. Pages 429–47 in Le origini dello gnosticismo, Colloquia di Messina 13–18 aprile 1966. Edited by Bianchi, U.. Leiden: Brill, 1967.Google Scholar
Comfort, Philip. Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography and Textual Criticism. Nashville: B&H Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Concannon, Cavan W. Assembling Early Christianity: Trade, Networks, and the Letters of Dionysios of Corinth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P. Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a New English Translation with Notes and Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Kevin, and Rasimus, Tuomas, eds. Gnosticism, Platonism and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John D. Turner. NHMS 82. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Creech, David. The Use of Scripture in the Apocryphon of John: A Diachronic Analysis of the Variant Versions. WUNT II 441. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. A Coptic Dictionary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1939.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Mary Rose. ‘“I Have Seen the Lord”: Mary Magdalen as Visionary, Early Christian Prophecy, and the Context of John 20:14–18’. Pages 95–122 in Mariam, the Magdalen, and the Mother. Edited by Good, Deirdre. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Davies, J. G. ‘The Primary Meaning of Παράκλητος’. JTS 4.1 (1953): 35–8.Google Scholar
Davies, Stevan. ‘The Christology and Protology of the “Gospel of Thomas”’. JBL 111.4 (1992): 663–82.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D., and Allison, Dale C.. Matthew 8–18. Vol. 2 of International Critical Commentary. London and New York: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. ed. The Codex Judas Papers: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Tchacos Codex Held at Rice University, Houston, Texas, March 13–16, 2008. NHMS 71. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. ‘The “Dialogue of the Savior” and the Mystical Sayings of Jesus’. VC 50.2 (1996): 178–99.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. Holy Misogyny: Why the Sex and Gender Conflicts in the Early Church Still Matter. New York and London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. ‘John Rivals Thomas: From Community Conflict to Gospel Narrative’. Pages 303–12 in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T. and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. The Original Gospel of Thomas in Translation: With a Commentary and New English Translation of the Complete Gospel. LNTS. London: T&T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. Seek to See Him: Ascent and Vision Mysticism in the Gospel of Thomas. VCSup 33. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980; repr. London and New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Nicola, Denzey Lewis. Cosmology and Fate in Gnosticism and Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Under Pitiless Skies. NHMS 81. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Nicola, Denzey Lewis. Introduction to ‘Gnosticism’: Ancient Voices, Christian Worlds. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. ‘The Law of Genre’. Glyph 7 (1980): 176–232.Google Scholar
Desjardins, Michel Robert. Sin in Valentinianism. SBLDS 108. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Dettwiler, Andreas. Die Gegenwart des Erhöhten: eine exegetische Studie zu den johanneischen Abschiedsreden (Joh 13,31-16,33) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres Relecture-Charakters. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1995.Google Scholar
Diehl, Judith A. ‘What Is a “Gospel”? Recent Studies in the Gospel Genre’. Currents in Biblical Research 9.2 (2011): 171–99.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. ‘The Descent of the Soul in Middle Platonic and Gnostic Theory’. Pages 357–64 in The Rediscovery of Gnosticism: Proceedings of the International Conference on Gnosticism at Yale, March 28–31, 1978. Edited by Layton, Bentley. Vol. 1 of Studies in the History of Religion 41. Leiden: Brill, 1980.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Revised. New York: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Terence L. Jesus on the Mountain: A Study in Matthean Theology. JSNTSup 8. Sheffield: JSOT, 1985.Google Scholar
Dunderberg, Ismo. The Beloved Disciple in Conflict? Revisiting the Gospels of John and Thomas. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dunderberg, Ismo. Beyond Gnosticism: Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dunderberg, Ismo. ‘Secrecy in the Gospel of John’. Pages 221–44 in Mystery and Secrecy in the Nag Hammadi Collection and Other Ancient Literature: Ideas and Practices. Edited by Bull, Christian H., Leid, Liv Ingeborg, and Turner, John D.. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Dunning, Benjamin H. ‘What Sort of Thing Is This Luminous Woman? Thinking Sexual Difference in On the Origin of the World’. JECS 16.1 (2009): 55–84.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Radcliffe G., III. Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic Gold Tablets’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Radcliffe G., Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert Michael. ‘The Rhetoric of Authority: The Nature of Revelation in the First Apocalypse of James’. Pages 65–79 in La Littérature des Questions et Réponses dans l’Antiquité profane et chrétienne: De l’enseignement à l’exégèse. Edited by Bussières, Marie-Pierre. Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 64. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D., and Pleše, Zlatko. The Apocryphal Gospels: Texts and Translations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Emmel, S. L., Koester, Helmut, and Pagels, Elaine Hiesey. Nag Hammadi Codex III,5: The Dialogue of the Savior. Leiden: Brill, 1984.Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon Jay. ‘The Multivalence of the Term “Original Text” in New Testament Textual Criticism’. HTR 92.3 (1999): 245–81.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. ‘Jesus in Gnostic Literature’. Biblica 62.3 (1981): 406–12.Google Scholar
Evans, Erin. The Books of Jeu and the Pistis Sophia as Handbooks to Eternity: Exploring the Gnostic Mysteries of the Ineffable. NHMS 89. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Falkenberg, René. ‘Matthew 28:16–20 and the Nag Hammadi Library: Reception of the Great Commission in the Sophia of Jesus Christ’. Pages 93–104 in Mark and Matthew II: Comparative Readings: Reception History, Cultural Hermeneutics, and Theology. Edited by Becker, Eve-Marie and Runesson, Anders. WUNT 304. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Fallon, Francis T. ‘Gnostic Apocalypses’. Semeia 14 (1979): 123–58.Google Scholar
Fallon, Francis T. ‘The Law in Philo and Ptolemy: A Note on the Letter to Flora’. VC 30.1 (1976): 45–51.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Johan. Johannine Ecclesiology. LNTS 160. Sheffield: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke X–XXIV. AB 28A. New York: Doubleday, 1985.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. ‘The Epistles of Ignatius of Antioch and the Writings That Later Formed the New Testament’. Pages 159–86 in The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers. Edited by Gregory, Andrew and Tuckett, Christopher M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. ‘Polymorphic Christology: Its Origins and Development in Early Christianity’. JTS 58.1 (2007): 66–99.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. ‘The Gospel of Philip’. Pages 68–83 in The Non-Canonical Gospels. Edited by Foster, Paul. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
France, R. T. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary on the Greek Text. NIGTC. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg. ‘Das Freer-Logion’. Pages 1059–61 in Antike Christliche Apokryphen in Deutscher Übersetzung: Band in Zwei Teilbänden: Evangelien Und Verwandtes. Edited by Schröter, Jens and Markschies, Christoph. Vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg. ‘Zu Text und Sinn des Freer-Logion’. ZNW 93.1–2 (2002): 13–34.Google Scholar
Frow, John. Genre. London and New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Fuller, Reginald H. The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel of Judas: Rewriting Early Christianity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary. TENT 11. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon. ‘“The Heavens and Earth Will Be Rolled Up”: The Eschatology of the Gospel of Thomas’. Pages 280–302 in Eschatologie – Eschatology. The Sixth Durham-Tübingen Research Symposium: Eschatology in Old Testament, Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity (Tübingen, September, 2009). Edited by Eckstein, Hans-Joachim, Landmesser, Christof, and Lichtenberger, Hermann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon. ‘Quis et Unde? Heavenly Obstacles in Gos. Thom. 50 and Related Literature’. Pages 82–101 in Paradise in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Views. Edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Stroumsa, Guy G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Glaser, Timo. ‘Liaisons Dangereuses: Epistolary Novels in Antiquity’. Pages 244–56 in A Companion to the Ancient Novel. Edited by Cueva, Edmund P. and Byrne, Shannon N.. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester and Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. Thomas and the Gospels: The Case for Thomas’s Familiarity with the Synoptics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Graf, Fritz, and Johnston, Sarah Iles. Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Gregory, Andrew. ‘Non-Canonical Epistles and Related Literature’. Pages 90–114 in The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Literature. Edited by Tuckett, Christopher and Gregory, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gregory, Andrew, and Tuckett, Christopher. ‘Series Preface’. Pages xii–xiv in Gospel of Mary. By Tuckett, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hahn, Ferdinand. The Titles of Jesus in Christology: Their History in Early Christianity. Translated by Knight, Harold and Ogg, George. Library of Theological Translations. Cambridge: James Clarke Co., 2002.Google Scholar
Haines-Eitzen, Kim. Guardians of Letters: Literacy, Power, and the Transmitters of Early Christian Literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf. ‘Die Verklärungsgeschichte Jesu, der Bericht des Paulus (I Kor. 15, 3ff) und die beiden Christusvisionen des Petrus’. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (1922): 62–80.Google Scholar
Hartenstein, Judith. ‘Dialogische Evangelien’. Pages 1051–9 in Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung: Band in zwei Teilbänden: Evangelien und Verwandtes. Edited by Markschies, Christoph and Schröter, Jens. Vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Hartenstein, Judith. Die zweite Lehre: Erscheinungen des Auferstandenen als Rahmenerzählungen frühchristlicher Dialoge. TU 146. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Hartenstein, Judith. ‘Erscheinungsevangelien (Gespräche mit dem Auferstandenen) im Kontext frühchristlicher Theologie: Anknüpfungspunkte und Besonderheiten der christologischen Vorstellungen’. Pages 305–32 in The Apocryphal Gospels within the Context of Early Christian Theology. Edited by Schröter, Jens. Leuven: Peeters, 2013.Google Scholar
Haxby, Mikael. ‘The First Apocalypse of James: Martyrdom and Sexual Difference’. Cambridge, MA: PhD Thesis, Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Charles W. ‘Kingdom Sayings and Parables of Jesus in the Apocryphon of James: Tradition and Redaction’. NTS 29.1 (1983): 1–24.Google Scholar
Helmer, Robert C. ‘“That We May Know and Understand”: Gospel Tradition in the Apocalypse of Peter’. Milwaukee, WI: PhD Thesis, Marquette University, 1998.Google Scholar
Hennecke, E., and Schneemelcher, W., eds. Neutestamentliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung: Evangelien. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1959.Google Scholar
Hill, Charles E. The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hills, Julian V. ‘Parables, Pretenders, and Prophecies: Translation and Interpretation in the Apocalypse of Peter 2’. Revue Biblique 98.4 (1991): 560–73.Google Scholar
Hills, Julian V. Tradition and Composition in the Epistula Apostolorum. HTS 57. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Martha. ‘The Experience of the Visionary and Genre in the Ascension of Isaiah 6–11 and the Apocalypse of Paul’. Semeia 36 (1986): 97–112.Google Scholar
Hogeterp, Albert L. A. ‘The Gospel of Thomas and the Historical Jesus: The Case of Eschatology’. Pages 381–96 in The Wisdom of Egypt: Jewish, Early Christian and Gnostic Essays in Honour of Gerard P. Luttikhuizen. Edited by Hilhorst, A. and van Kooten, G. H.. AGJU/AJEC 59. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Hornschuh, Manfred. Studien zur Epistula Apostolorum. Patristische Texte und Studien 5. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. ‘The Greek Fragments of “The Gospel of Thomas” as Artefacts: Papyrological Observations on P. Oxy. 1, P.Oxy 654, and P. Oxy 655’. Pages 19–32 in Das Thomasevangelium: Entstehung – Rezeption – Theologie. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Popkes, Enno Edzard, and Schröter, Jens. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Iricinschi, Eduard. ‘Scribes and Readers of Nag Hammadi Codex II: Book Production and Monastic Paideia in Fourth-Century Egypt’. PhD Thesis, Princeton, 2009.Google Scholar
Jakab, A. ‘The Reception of the Apocalypse of Peter in Ancient Christianity’. Pages 174–86 in The Apocalypse of Peter. Edited by Bremmer, Jan N. and Czachesz, István. Studies on Early Christian Apocrypha 7. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Janssen, Martina. ‘Mystagogus Gnosticus? Zur Gattung der “gnostischen Gespräche des Auferstandenen”’. Pages 21–260 in Studien zur Gnosis. Edited by Lüdemann, Gerd. Studies in the Religion and History of Early Christianity. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar
Jenott, Lance. ‘Reading Variants in James and the Apocalypse of James: A Perspective from New Philology’. Pages 55–84 in Snapshots of Evolving Traditions: Jewish and Christian Manuscript Culture, Textual Fluidity, and New Philology. Edited by Leid, Liv Ingeborg and Lundhaug, Hugo. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar
Jenott, Lance. The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of ‘the Betrayer’s Gospel’. STAC 64. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Jenott, Lance, and Pagels, Elaine. ‘Antony’s Letters and Nag Hammadi Codex I: Sources of Religious Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt’. JECS 18.4 (2010): 557–89.Google Scholar
Johnston, George. The Spirit-Paraclete in the Gospel of John. SNTSMS 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kaler, Michael. ‘Just How Close Are the Gnostic Revelation Dialogues to Erotapokriseis Literature, Anyway?’. Pages 37–49 in La Littérature des Questions et Réponses dans l’Antiquité profane et chrétienne: De l’enseignement à l’exégèse. Edited by Bussières, Marie-Pierre. Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 64. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Kazen, Thomas. ‘Sectarian Gospels for Some Christians? Intention and Mirror Reading in the Light of Extra-Canonical Texts’. NTS 51.4 (2005): 561–78.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelhoffer, James A. ‘The Witness of Eusebius’s Ad Marinum and Other Christian Writings to Text-Critical Debates Concerning the Original Conclusion to Mark’s Gospel’. Pages 121–64 in Conceptions of ‘Gospel’ and Legitimacy in Early Christianity. WUNT 324. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘The Gospel of Mary Magdalene’. Pages 601–34 in Searching the Scriptures, II: A Feminist Commentary. Edited by Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler. New York: Crossroad, 1994.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. The Gospel of Mary of Magdala: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle. Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge Press, 2003.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘Hearing, Seeing, and Knowing God: Allogenes and the Gospel of Mary’. Pages 319–32 in Early Christian Voices in Texts, Traditions, and Symbols: Essays in Honor of François Bovon. Edited by Warren, David H., Brock, Ann Graham, and Pao, David W.. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘Martyrdom and Its Discontents in the Tchacos Codex’. Pages 23–42 in The Codex Judas Papers: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Tchacos Codex Held at Rice University, Houston, Texas, March 13–16, 2008. Edited by DeConick, April D.. NHMS 71. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘Mystery and Secrecy in the Secret Revelation of John’. Pages 61–86 in Mystery and Secrecy in the Nag Hammadi Collection and Other Ancient Literature: Ideas and Practices. Edited by Bull, Christian H., Leid, Liv Ingeborg, and Turner, John D.. NHMS 76. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘Prophetic Power and Women’s Authority: The Case of the Gospel of Mary (Magdalene)’. Pages 21–41 in Women Preachers and Prophets Through Two Millennia of Christianity. Edited by Kienzle, Beverly Mayne and Walker, Pamela J.. Berkeley and LA: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘The Place of the Gospel of Philip in the Context of Early Christian Claims about Jesus’ Marital Status’. NTS 59.4 (2013): 565–87.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. ‘Why All the Controversy? Mary in the Gospel of Mary’. Pages 53–74 in Which Mary? The Marys of Early Christian Tradition. Edited by Jones, F. Stanley. SBL Symposium Series 19. Edited by Christopher R. Matthews. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. The Apocryphal Gospels: An Introduction. Translated by McNeil, Brian. London: T&T Clark, 2003.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development. London: SCM Press; Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1990.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. ‘One Jesus and Four Primitive Gospels’. HTR 61.2 (1968): 203–47.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. ‘The Text of the Synoptic Gospels in the Second Century’. Pages 19–37 in Gospel Traditions in the Second Century: Origins, Recensions, Text, and Transmission. Edited by Peterson, William L.. Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut, and Pagels, Elaine. ‘Introduction’. Pages 1–19 in Nag Hammadi Codex III, 5: The Dialogue of the Savior. CGL. Leiden: Brill, 1984.Google Scholar
Koschorke, Klaus. ‘Eine gnostische Paraphrase des johanneischen Prologs: zur Interpretation von “Epistula Petri ad Philippum” (NHC VIII, 2) 136,16–137,4’. VC 33.4 (1979): 383–92.Google Scholar
Kraus, Thomas J., and Nicklas, Tobias. Das Petrusevangelium und die Petrusapokalypse. Die griechischen Fragmente mit deutscher und englischer Übersetzung. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar
Krause, Martin. ‘Die literarischen Gattungen der Apokalypsen von Nag Hammadi’. Pages 621–37 in Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Apocalypticism, Uppsala, August 12–17, 1979. Edited by Hellholm, David. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1983.Google Scholar
Kruger, Michael J. The Gospel of the Savior: An Analysis of P.Oxy. 840 and Its Place in the Gospel Traditions of Early Christianity. TENT 1. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Lampe, G. W. H., ed. Patristic Greek Lexicon. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Lang, T. J. Mystery and the Making of a Christian Historical Consciousness: From Paul to the Second Century. BZNW 219. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Lapham, F. Peter: The Myth, the Man and the Writings: A Study of the Early Petrine Text and Tradition. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Layton, Bentley. ‘Ptolemy’s Epistle to Flora’. Pages 306–15 in The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation with Annotations and Introductions. Garden City: Doubleday, 1987.Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. The Afterlife Imagery in Luke’s Story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. NovTSup 123. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. Debates over the Resurrection of the Dead. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Létourneau, Pierre. Le Dialogue du Sauveur (NH III,5). BCNH:T 29. Louvain: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Létourneau, Pierre. ‘The Dialogue of the Savior as a Witness to the Late Valentinian Tradition’. VC 65.1 (2011): 74–98.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. Ephesians. World Bible Commentary 42. Waco, TX: Word, 1990.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N.. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Volume 1, Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, E. ‘Évangile selon Marie ou Évangile selon Marie-Madeleine?’ Analecta Bollandiana 103.3–4 (1985): 366.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Dieter. Die apokryph gewordenen Evangelien: Studien zu Neuen Texten und zu Neuen Fragen. NovTSup 112. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Luijendijk, AnneMarie. ‘Sacred Scriptures as Trash: Biblical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus’. VC 64.3 (2010): 217–54.Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis on the Soul. NHMS 73. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. ‘An Illusion of Textual Stability: Textual Fluidity, New Philology, and the Nag Hammadi Codices’. Pages 20–54 in Snapshots of Evolving Traditions: Jewish and Christian Manuscript Culture, Textual Fluidity, and New Philology. Edited by Liv Ingeborg Lied and Hugo Lundhaug, TU 175. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar
Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. Gnostic Revisions of Genesis Stories and Early Jesus Traditions. NHMS 58. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. ‘The Evaluation of the Teaching of Jesus in Christian Gnostic Revelation Dialogues’. NovT 30.2 (1988): 158–68.Google Scholar
Luttikhuizen, Gerard P. ‘The Suffering Jesus and the Invulnerable Christ in the Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter’. Pages 187–99 in The Apocalypse of Peter. Edited by Bremmer, Jan N. and Czachesz, István. Studies on the Early Christian Apocrypha 7. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Marincola, John. ‘Genre, Convention, and Innovation in Greco-Roman Historiography’. Pages 281–324 in The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Edited by Kraus, C. S.. Mnemosyne, Bibliotheca Classica Batava: Supplementum 191. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Marjanen, Antti. ‘The Mother of Jesus or the Magdalene? The Identity of Mary in the So-Called Gnostic Christian Texts’. Pages 31–42 in Which Mary? The Marys of Early Christian Tradition. Edited by Stanley Jones, F.. SBL Symposium Series 19. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.Google Scholar
Marjanen, Antti. The Woman Jesus Loved: Mary Magdalene in the Nag Hammadi Library and Related Documents. NHMS 40. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph, and Schröter, Jens, eds. Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung: Evangelien und Verwantes. Vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Dale. The Corinthian Body. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. Louis. History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel. 3rd ed. New Testament Library. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.Google Scholar
May, Gerhard. Creatio ex Nihilo: The Doctrine of ‘Creation out of Nothing’ in Early Christian Thought. Translated by Worrall, A. S.. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Meyer, Marvin W. The Letter of Peter to Philip. SBLDS 53. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Meyer, Marvin, and Scopello, Madeleine. ‘The Secret Book of James’. Pages 19–30 in The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition. Edited by Meyer, Marvin. New York: Harper Collins, 2007.Google Scholar
Meyer, Marvin, and Scopello, Madeleine. ‘The Wisdom of Jesus Christ’. Pages 283–96 in The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition. Edited by Marvin Meyer. New York: Harper Collins, 2007.Google Scholar
Mohri, Erika. Maria Magdalena: Frauenbilder in Evangelientexten des 1. bis 3. Jahrhunderts. Marburger theologische Studien 63. Marburg: Elwert, 2000.Google Scholar
Moore, A. L. The Parousia in the New Testament. NovTSup 13. Leiden: Brill, 1966.Google Scholar
Morris, Leon. Luke: An Introduction and Commentary. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 1988.Google Scholar
Muddiman, John. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Ephesians. Black’s New Testament Commentaries. London and New York: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Laura Salah. An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early Christianity. HTS 52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nicklas, Tobias. ‘Gnostic “Eschatologies”’. Pages 601–28 in Eschatology of the New Testament and Some Related Documents. Edited by van der Watt, J.. WUNT II 315. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Niederwimmer, Kurt. The Didache: A Commentary. Edited by Attridge, Harold W.. Translated by Maloney, Linda M.. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar
van Os, Bas. ‘John’s Last Supper and the Resurrection Dialogues’. Pages 271–80 in John, Jesus, and History: Aspects of Historicity in the Fourth Gospel. Volume 2. Edited by Anderson, Paul N., Just, Felix, and Thatcher, Tom. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009.Google Scholar
Osborn, Eric. Clement of Alexandria. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine H. The Gnostic Gospels. New York: Random House, 1979.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine H. The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine H. ‘“The Mystery of the Resurrection”: A Gnostic Reading of 1 Corinthians 15’. JBL 93.2 (1974): 276–88.Google Scholar
Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Parkhouse, Sarah. ‘Identity, Death and Ascension in the Gospel of John and the First Apocalypse of James’. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Parkhouse, Sarah. ‘Matter and the Soul: The Bipartite Eschatology of the Gospel of Mary’. Pages 216–32 in Connecting Gospels: Beyond the Canonical/Non-Canonical Divide. Edited by Watson, Francis and Parkhouse, Sarah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Parkhouse, Sarah. ‘The Fetishization of Female Exempla: Mary, Thecla, Perpetua and Felicitas’. NTS 63.4 (2017): 567–87.Google Scholar
Parrott, D. M. Nag Hammadi Codices III,3–4 and V,1, with Papyrus Berolinensis 8502,3 and Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 1081: Eugnostos and the Sophia of Jesus Christ. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1991.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. ‘3525: Gospel of Mary’. Pages 12–14 in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Graeco-Roman Memoirs 70, Vol. 50. London: Egypt Exploration Society, 1983.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Anne. ‘L’eschatologie dans L’Évangile selon Marie: étude des notions de nature et d’image’. Pages 390–404 in Colloque international sur les textes de Nag Hammadi (Québec, 22–25 août 1978). Edited by Barc, Bernard. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1981.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Anne. L’Évangile Selon Marie. BCNH:T 10. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1983.Google Scholar
Peel, Malcolm L. ‘Gnostic Eschatology and the New Testament’. NovT 12.2 (1970): 141–65.Google Scholar
Penn, Michael Philip. Kissing Christians: Ritual and Community in the Late Ancient Church. Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. ‘Gnostic Christologies and the New Testament’. CBQ 43.4 (1981): 590–607.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. The Gnostic Dialogue: The Early Church and the Crisis of Gnosticism. New York: Paulist Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. Gnosticism and the New Testament. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. ‘Johannine Traditions in Ap. Jas. (NHC 1,2)’. JBL 101.3 (1982): 403–14.Google Scholar
Petersen, Silke. Zerstört die Werke der Weiblichkeit! Maria Magdalena, Salome und andere Jüngerinnen Jesu in christlich-gnostischen Schriften. NHMS 48. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Pétrement, Simone. A Separate God: The Origins and Teachings of Gnosticism. Translated by Harrison, Carol. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1984.Google Scholar
Piovanelli, Pierluigi. ‘Entre oralité et (ré)écriture : Le modèle des erotapokriseis dans les dialogues Apocryphes de Nag Hammadi’. Pages 93–103 in La Littérature des Questions et Réponses dans l’Antiquité profane et chrétienne: De l’enseignement à l’exégèse. Edited by Bussières, Marie-Pierre. Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 64. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Pleše, Zlatko. Poetics of the Gnostic Universe: Narrative and Cosmology in the Apocryphon of John. NHMS 52. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Popkes, Enno Edzard. ‘Von der Eschatologie zur Protologie: Transformationen apokalyptischer Motive im koptischen Thomasevangelium’. Pages 211–34 in Apokalyptik als Herausforderung neutestamentlicher Theologie. Edited by Michael Becker and Markus Öhler. WUNT II 214. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Puech, Henri-Charles, and Blatz, Beate. ‘The Gospel of Mary’. Pages 391–5 in New Testament Apocrypha. Edited by Schneemelcher, Wilhelm. Translated by Wilson, R. McL.. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Quispel, G. Ptolémée. Lettre à Flora: Texte, Traduction et Introduction. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1949.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. The Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment from the New Testament to Eriugena. VCSup 120. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Rasimus, Tuomas, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, and Dunderberg, Ismo, eds. Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar
Ridderbos, Herman. The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary. Translated by Vriend, John. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. H. ‘463: The Gospel of Mary’. Pages 18–23 in Catalogue of the Greek Papyri in the John Rylands Library. Vol. 3. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M. ‘Jesus from Easter to Valentinus (Or to the Apostles’ Creed)’. JBL 101.1 (1982): 5–37.Google Scholar
Roy, Louise, and Rouleau, Donald. L’Épître apocryphe de Jacques (NH I,2) suivi de l’Acte de Pierre (BG 4). BCNH:T 18. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 1987.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Kurt. ‘Der Gnostische “Dialog” als Literarisches Genus’. Pages 85–107 in Probleme Der Koptischen Literatur. Edited by Nagel, Peter. Halle: Wissenschaftliche Beiträge der Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 1968.Google Scholar
Salles, Ricardo, ed. God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schaberg, Jane. The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene: Legends, Apocrypha, and the Christian Testament. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2004.Google Scholar
Schenke, Hans-Martin. ‘Function and Background of the Beloved Disciple’. Pages 598–613 in Der Same Seths: Hans-Martin Schenkes kleine Schriften zu Gnosis, Koptologie und Neuem Testament. Edited by Robinson, Gesine Schenke, Schenke, Gesa, and Plisch, Uwe-Karsten. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Schenke Robinson, Gesine. ‘The Relationship of the Gospel of Judas to the New Testament and to Sethianism’. Journal of Coptic Studies 10 (2008): 63–98.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Carl. Pistis Sophia. Translated by MacDermot, Violet. CGL: NHMS 4. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Gospel According to John: Vol. 3. Commentary on Chapters 13–21. Translated by Smith, David and Kon, G. A.. Kent: Burns & Oates, 1988.Google Scholar
Schneemelcher, W. New Testament Apocrypha: Gospels and Related Writings. Translated by Wilson, R. McL.. 6th ed. Vol. 1. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. ‘Anapausis’. Reallexikon für Antike Christentum I (1950): 414–18.Google Scholar
Schröter, Jens. ‘Zur Menschensohnvorstellung im Evangelium nach Maria’. Pages 178–88 in Ägypten und Nubien in spätantiker und christlicher Zeit. Akten des 6. Internationalen Koptologenkongresses Münster, 20.–26. Juli 1996. Band 2 Schrifttum, Sprache und Gedankenwelt. Edited by Emmel, Stephen, Krause, Martin, Richter, Siegfried G., and Schaten, Sofia. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Thomas R. ‘Narrative Analysis as a Text Critical Tool: Mark 16 in Codex W as a Test Case’. JSNT 32.1 (2009): 77–98.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Ruth. ‘John’s Gospel and Modern Genre Theory: The Farewell Discourse (John 13–17) as a Test Case’. Irish Theological Quarterly 75.3 (2010): 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shisha-Halevy, Ariel. ‘Future, Present, Narrative Past: A Triple Note on Oxyrhynchite Tempuslehre’. Pages 249–309 in Sprache und Geist. Peter Nagel zum 65. Geburtstag. Edited by Beltz, Walter, Pietruschka, Ute, and Tubach, Jürgen. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2003.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Stephen J. ‘Rethinking the “Gnostic Mary”: Mary of Nazareth and Mary of Magdala in Early Christian Tradition’. JECS 9.4 (2001): 555–95.Google Scholar
Siker, Jeffrey S. ‘The Parousia of Jesus in Second- and Third-Century Christianity’. Pages 147–67 in The Return of Jesus in Early Christianity. Edited by Carroll, John T.. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Lynwood, and Kostopoulos, Zachary Lundin. ‘Biography, History and the Genre of Luke-Acts’. NTS 63.3 (2017): 390–410.Google Scholar
Stanton, Graham N. Jesus and Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Strawbridge, Jennifer R. The Pauline Effect: The Use of the Pauline Epistles by Early Christian Writers. SBR 5. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy G. Hidden Wisdom: Esoteric Traditions and the Roots of Christian Mysticism. 2nd ed. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Ephesians and Colossians. Paideia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts: A Literary Interpretation. Volume 1: The Gospel According to Luke. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Tardieu, Michel. Écrits Gnostiques: Codex de Berlin. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1986.Google Scholar
Tardieu, Michel, and Dubois, Jean-Daniel. Introduction à la littérature gnostique. I: Collections retrouvées avant 1945. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1986.Google Scholar
Tervahauta, Ulla. A Story of the Soul’s Journey in the Nag Hammadi Library: A Study of Authentikos Logos (NHC VI,3). Novum Testamentum et Orbis Antiquus 107. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015.Google Scholar
Thielman, Frank. Ephesians. BECNT. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar. ‘Gnostics and Orphics’. Pages 463–74 in Myths, Martyrs, and Modernity: Studies in the History of Religions in Honour of Jan N. Bremmer. Edited by Dijkstra, Jitse, Kroesen, Justin, and Kuiper, Yme. Studies in the History of Religions 127. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar. The Spiritual Seed. The Church of the Valentinians. NHMS 60. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Till, Walter C. Die gnostischen Schriften des koptischen Papyrus Berolinensis 8502: Zweite, erweiterte Auflage bearbeitet von Hans-Martin Schenke. TU 60. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Tite, Philip L. Valentinian Ethics and Paraenetic Discourse: Determining the Social Function of Moral Exhortation in Valentinian Christianity. NHMS 67. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. ‘The Origin of Genres’. Pages 193–209 in Modern Genre Theory. Edited by Duff, David. New York: Longman, 2000.Google Scholar
Trevett, Christine. ‘Prophets, Economics, and the Rites of Man’. Pages 43–64 in Revelation, Literature, and Community in Late Antiquity. Edited by Townsend, Philippa and Vidas, Moulie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. ‘Forty Other Gospels’. Pages 238–53 in The Written Gospel. Edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Hagner, Donald A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. The Gospel of Mary. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. Nag Hammadi and the Gospel Tradition: Synoptic Tradition in the Nag Hammadi Library. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1986.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. ‘“Nomina Sacra”: Yes and No?’. Pages 431–58 in The Biblical Canons, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium. Edited by Auwers, J. M. and de Jonge, H. J.. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. ‘Synoptic Tradition in Some Nag Hammadi and Related Texts’. VC 36.2 (1982): 173–90.Google Scholar
Turner, John D. The Book of Thomas the Contender from Codex II of the Cairo Gnostic Library from Nag Hammadi (CG II, 7): The Coptic Text with Translation, Introduction and Commentary. SBLDS 23. Missoula, Montana: Society of Biblical Literature and Scholars Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Turner, John D. ‘The Johannine Legacy: The Gospel and Apocryphon of John’. Pages 105–45 in The Legacy of John: Second-Century Reception of the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Rasimus, Tuomas. NovTSup 132. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Turner, John D. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. BCNH:E 6. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2001.Google Scholar
Van Unnik, W. C. ‘The Origin of the Recently Discovered “Apocryphon Jacobi”’. VC 10.3 (1956): 149–56.Google Scholar
van der Vliet, Jacques. ‘Fate, Magic and Astrology in Pistis Sophia, Chaps 15–21’. Pages 519–36 in The Wisdom of Egypt: Jewish, Early Christian and Gnostic Essays in Honour of Gerard P. Luttikhuizen. Edited by Hilhorst, A. and van Kooten, G. H.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 59. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
van der Vliet, Jacques. ‘Spirit and Prophecy in the Epistula Iacobi Apocrypha (NHC I,2)’. VC 44.1 (1990): 25–53.Google Scholar
Vander Stichele, Caroline. ‘The Head of John and its Reception or How to Conceptualize “Reception History”’. Pages 79–93 in Reception History and Biblical Studies: Theory and Practice. Edited by England, Emma and Lyons, William John. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 615. London and New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. ‘A Gospel of the Eleven: The Epistula Apostolorum and the Johannine Tradition’. Pages 189–215 in Connecting Gospels: Beyond the Canonical/Non-Canonical Divide. Edited by Watson, Francis and Parkhouse, Sarah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Gospel Writing: A Canonical Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
Welburn, A. J. ‘The Identity of the Archons in the “Apocryphon Johannis”’. VC 32.4 (1978): 241–54.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E. ‘The Apocryphon of James (I, 2)’. Pages 29–31 in The Nag Hammadi Library in English. Edited by Robinson, James M.. Leiden and New York: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Williams, Francis E. ‘The Apocryphon of James – 1,2: 1.1 – 16:30’. Pages 13–53 in Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex). Edited by Attridge, Harold W.. NHMS 22. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael A. The Immovable Race: A Gnostic Designation and the Theme of Stability in Late Antiquity. NHS 29. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael A. ‘Secrecy, Revelation, and Late Antique Demiurgical Myths’. Pages 31–58 in Rending the Veil: Concealment and Secrecy in the History of Religions. Edited by Wolfson, Elliot R.. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael A. Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wilmet, M. Concordance du Nouveau Testament sahidique, II. Les mots autochtones, 3. CSCO 185. Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1959.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. McL. The Gospel of Philip: Translated from the Coptic Text, with an Introduction and Commentary. London: A. R. Mowbray & Co, 1962.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. McL. ‘The New Testament in the Gnostic Gospel of Mary’. NTS 3.3 (1957): 236–43.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. McL., and MacRae, George W.. ‘The Gospel According to Mary: BG, 1:7,1–19,5’. Pages 453–71 in Nag Hammadi Codices V,2–5 and VI with Papyrus Berlinensis 8502,1 and 4. Edited by Parrott, D. M.. NHS 11. Leiden: Brill, 1979.Google Scholar
Wisse, Frederick. ‘The Coptic Versions of the New Testament’. Pages 131–41 in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. Edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Woll, D. Bruce. ‘The Departure of “The Way”: The First Farewell Discourse in the Gospel of John’. JBL 99.2 (1980): 225–39.Google Scholar
Wolters, Al. ‘Worldview and Textual Criticism in 2 Peter 3:10’. Westminster Theological Journal 49 (1987): 405–13.Google Scholar
Zamagni, Claudio. ‘Is the Question-and-Answer Literary Genre in Early Christian Literature a Homogeneous Group?’. Pages 241–68 in La Littérature des Questions et Réponses dans l’Antiquité profane et chrétienne: De l’enseignement à l’exégèse. Edited by Bussières, Marie-Pierre. Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 64. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Zelyck, Lorne R. John among the Other Gospels: The Reception of the Fourth Gospel in the Extra-Canonical Gospels. WUNT II 347. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Parkhouse, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
  • Book: Eschatology and the Saviour
  • Online publication: 16 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108689953.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Parkhouse, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
  • Book: Eschatology and the Saviour
  • Online publication: 16 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108689953.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Parkhouse, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
  • Book: Eschatology and the Saviour
  • Online publication: 16 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108689953.011
Available formats
×