Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
[T]he understanding of “if ” is not a narrow academic concern, but a matter of central importance in the understanding of what makes human intelligence special and distinctive.
Jonathan Evans and David Over, If (p. 153)Conditionals are sentences of the forms “If φ, [then] ψ” and “ψ if φ,” such as
a. If the village is flooded, then the dam must have broken.
b. If Henry had come to the party, Sue would have come too.
c. Paul would have bought the house if it hadn't been so expensive.
One may also classify as conditionals sentences that can be naturally put in the above forms, such as
a. They will leave in an hour, unless John changes his mind.
b. No guts, no glory.
c. Give Louis a toy and he'll ruin it.
which can be rephrased as, respectively, (1.3a), (1.3b), and (1.3c):
a. If John does not change his mind, they will leave in an hour.
b. If a person lacks courage, there will be no glory for him or her.
c. If one gives Louis a toy, he ruins it.
In “If φ, then ψ,” φ is called the “antecedent” and ψ the “consequent.”
Conditionals are special. They are special for a number of reasons, but probably most conspicuously for the heated controversy that they have generated, and continue to generate. Not that controversy is anything out of the ordinary in philosophy. But even in philosophy, controversies commonly take place against a shared background of basic assumptions. For instance, while there is ongoing controversy about the concept of knowledge, there is at the same time broad (if not universal) agreement on many core issues surrounding that concept. Few dispute that knowledge is factive; that it requires belief as well as justification; that justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge, however; that coherence amongst one's beliefs is not enough to elevate these to the status of knowledge; that we can gain knowledge from testimony; and so on and so forth. Not so in the case of conditionals. For almost any claim about conditionals that is not downright trivial, it will be exceedingly hard to find a majority, or even a sizable minority, of philosophers who adhere to it.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.