Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental ExpertiseConnecting Science, Policy and Society, pp. xi - xvPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Communication from the Commission on the Collection and Use of Expertise by the Commission: Principles and Guidelines: Improving the Knowledge Base for Better Policies. ‘Improving the Knowledge Base for Better Policies’, COM(2002) 713 final. http://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/comm_expertise_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A., and Smith-Doerr, L., eds. (2016). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and Power: Democracy and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halffman, W., and Ragas, A. M. (2016). Achter de Horizon: Omgaan met onzekerheid bij nieuwe risico’s. Den Haag: www.rijksoverheid.nl.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, A. C., Janssen, P. H. M., van der Sluijs, J. P., et al. (2013). Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication. The Hague: PBL.Google Scholar
Pielke, R. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. (1995). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Arena.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sismondo, S. (2004). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
UK Government. (2005). Guidelines on Scientific Analysis in Policy Making. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070402091927/http://www.dti.gov.uk/science/science-in-govt/works/advice-policy-making/guidelines/page9474.htmlGoogle Scholar
Van Asselt, M. B. A. (2000). Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The PRIMA Approach to Decision Support. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Sluijs, J. P., Janssen, P. H. M., Petersen, A. C., Kloprogge, P., Risbey, J. S., and Tuinstra, W. (2004). RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Tool Catalogue for Uncertainty Assessment. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., and Wynne, B., eds., Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology (pp. 44–83). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Yearley, S. (2005). Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. C., Watt, A. D., and Van den Hove, S. (2013). Effective Interfaces between Science, Policy and Society: The SPIRAL Project Handbook. www.spiral-project.eu.Google Scholar