Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
9 - Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental ExpertiseConnecting Science, Policy and Society, pp. 222 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bednarek, A. T., Shouse, B., Hudson, C. G., and Goldburg, R. (2016). Science-policy Intermediaries from a Practitioner’s Perspective: The Lenfest Ocean Program Experience. Science and Public Policy, 43, 291–300.Google Scholar
Brunet, L., Tuomisaari, J., Lavorel, S., et al. (2018). Actionable Knowledge for Land Use Planning: Making Ecosystem Services Operational. Land Use Policy, 72, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P. (1993). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., and Turnhout, E. (2009). Working at the Science–Policy Interface: A Discursive Analysis of Boundary Work at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 576–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, I., Daalen, C., and Bots, P. (2004). Perspectives on Policy Analyses: A Framework for Understanding and Design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S. (2009). Matching Knowledge Brokering Strategies to Environmental Policy Problems and Settings. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 994–1011.Google Scholar
Rantala, L., Sarkki, S., Karjalainen, T. P., and Rossi, P. M. (2017). How to Earn the Status of Honest Broker? Scientists’ Roles Facilitating the Political Water Supply Decision-making Process. Society & Natural Resources, 30, 1288–1298.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E. (2017). Integere relaties: wetenschappelijke integriteit en de verhouding tussen wetenschap en samenleving. Beleid en Maatschappij, 44(1), 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., and Leeuwis, C. (2013). New Roles of Science in Society: Different Repertoires of Knowledge Brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365Google Scholar