Abers, R. N., & Keck, M. E. (2013). Practical authority: Agency and institutional change in Brazilian water politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. (1987). The power of ideology: The quest for technological autonomy in Argentina and Brazil. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (1992). The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control. International Organization, 46(01), 101–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. (2008). The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A. (2014). Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: Some concluding thoughts. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcañiz, I. (2000). Slipping into something more comfortable: Argentine-Brazilian nuclear integration and the origins of the MERCOSUR. In Derluguian, G. M. & Greer, S. L. (Eds.), Questioning geopolitics: Political projects in a changing world-system (pp. 155–168). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Alcañiz, I. (2005a). Defeating welfare retrenchment: Privatization and conflict in the Argentine nuclear energy sector. New Political Science, 27(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcañiz, I. (2005b). La política nuclear Argentina y el Instituto Balseiro: Cincuenta años de historia (Argentine nuclear policy and the Balseiro Institute: Fifty years of history). Ciencia Hoy, 88, 20–25.Google Scholar

Alcañiz, I. (2010). Bureaucratic networks and government spending: A network analysis of nuclear cooperation in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 45(1), 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcañiz, I. (2012). Democratization and multilateral security. World Politics, 64(02), 306–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcañiz, I., & Gutiérrez, R. A. (2009). From local protest to the International Court of Justice. In Harris, P. G. (Ed.), Environmental change and foreign policy: Theory and practice (pp. 109–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alcañiz, I., & Hellwig, T. (2011). Who's to blame? The distribution of responsibility in developing democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 41(02), 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alemán, E., & Calvo, E. (2013). Explaining policy ties in presidential congresses: A network analysis of bill initiation data. Political Studies, 61(2), 356–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1997). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amengual, M. (2016). Politicized enforcement in Argentina: Labor and environmental regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amirault, R. J., & Branson, R. K. (2006). Educators and expertise: A brief history of theories and models. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 69–86). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andler, L. (2009). The secretariat of the global environment facility: From network to bureaucracy. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.), Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 203–223). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andonova, L. B. (2014). Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability. Comparative Political Studies, 47(3), 481–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andonova, L. B., & Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arriola, L. R., & Johnson, M. C. (2014). Ethnic politics and women's empowerment in Africa: Ministerial appointments to executive cabinets. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auyero, J., & Swistun, D. A. (2009). Flammable: Environmental suffering in an Argentine shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2010). Transgovernmental networks and domestic policy convergence: Evidence from insider trading regulation. International Organization, 64(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2014). Domestic drivers of transgovernmental regulatory cooperation. Regulation & Governance, 8(4), 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bafumi, J., Gelman, A., Park, D. K., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis, 13(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. (2009). The market and the masses in Latin America: Policy reform and consumption in liberalizing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (2016). Gendering legislative behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bendor, J., & Meirowitz, A. (2004). Spatial models of delegation. American Political Science Review, 98(02), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self‐organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berardo, R., Alcañiz, I., Hadden, J., & Jasny, L. (2016). Environmental politics and networks. In Nicoll, J., Lubell, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political networks. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A., & Dion, S. (1990). Are bureaucrats budget maximizers? The Niskanen model & its critics. Polity, 22(4), 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, A. L., & Snower, D. J. (1996). Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1999). Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (2005). Skill formation in the twenty-first century. In Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (Eds.), High skills: Globalization, competitiveness, and skill formation (pp. 1–55). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (2005). High skills: Globalization, competitiveness, and skill formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, M. R., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The political economy of collective skill formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2013). When parties meet voters: Assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Politics Studies, 46(07), 851–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campion, P., & Shrum, W. (2004). Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and India. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(04), 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carasales, J. C. (1997). De rivales a socios: El proceso de cooperación nuclear entre Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar

Carasales, J. C., & Ornstein, R. (1998). La Cooperación Internacional de la Argentina en el Campo Nuclear. Buenos Aires: Editorial CARI.Google Scholar

Caraway, T. L., Rickard, S. J., & Anner, M. S. (2012). International negotiations and domestic politics: The case of IMF labor market conditionality. International Organization, 66(01), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmen, E., Nesshöver, C., Saarikoski, H., Vandewalle, M., Watt, A., Wittmer, H., & Young, J. (2015). Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European network of knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy, 54(01), 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chwieroth, J. M. (2007). Testing and measuring the role of ideas: The case of neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). How do crises lead to change? Liberalizing capital controls in the early years of new order Indonesia. World Politics, 62(03), 496–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coll, J. A., & Radicella, R. (1998). First nuclear technology transfers and the subsequent developments in the radioisotope field. In Carasales, J. C. & Ornstein, R. (Eds.), La Cooperación internacional de la Argentina en el campo nuclear. Buenos Aires: Editorial CARI.Google Scholar

Conca, K. (2005). Old states in new bottles? The hybridization of authority in global environmental governance. In Barry, J. & Eckersley, R. (Eds.), The state and the global ecological crisis (pp. 181–205). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Conceição, P., & Marone, H. (2008). Characterizing the 21st century first commodity boom: Drivers and impact. Working Paper of the Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar

Copelovitch, M. S. (2010). Master or servant? Common agency and the political economy of IMF lending. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremer, H., & Laffont, J.-J. (2003). Public goods with costly access. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9), 1985–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, J. (2007). The forging of judicial autonomy: Political entrepreneurship and the reforms of William Howard Taft. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dankelman, I. (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. Washington DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). The impacts of information technology on public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the “Golden Age” of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darnton, C. (2014). Rivalry and alliance politics in cold war Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Da Rosa, , , J. E. (1983). Economics, politics, and hydroelectric power: The Paraná river basin. Latin American Research Review, 18(3), 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Andrade, A. M. R., & dos Santos, T. L. (2013). A dinâmica política da criação da Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, 1956–1960 (Political dynamics of the creation of the Brazilian National Commission for Nuclear Energy, 1956–1960). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 8(1), 113–128.Google Scholar

De Ferranti, D. M. (2003). Closing the gap in education and technology. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Grip, A., & Van Loo, J. (2002). The economics of skills obsolescence: A review. Research in Labor Economics, 21, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erten, B., & Ocampo, J. A. (2013). Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century. World Development, 44, 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escobar-Lemmon, M. C., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2014). Representation: The case of women. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estévez-Abe, M. (2012). Gendered consequences of vocational training. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 259–283). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 145–183). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evangelista, M. (1993). Internal and external constraints on grand strategy: The Soviet case. In Rosecrance, R. N. & Stein, A. A. (Eds.), The domestic bases of grand strategy (pp. 154–178). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Evangelista, M. (2002). Unarmed forces: The transnational movement to end the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evetts, J., Mieg, H. A., & Felt, U. (2006). Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: A sociological perspective. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 105–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falleti, T. G. (2011). Varieties of authoritarianism: The organization of the military state and its effects on federalism in Argentina and Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fan, S., & Rao, N. (2003). Public spending in developing countries: Trends, determination and impact. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

Fredriksson, P. G., & Gaston, N. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? Public Choice, 104(3–4), 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frieden, J. A. (1991). Debt, development, and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gailmard, S. (2002). Expertise, subversion, and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 536–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2013). Learning while governing: Expertise and accountability in the executive branch. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Africa's overgrown state reconsidered: Bureaucracy and economic growth. World Politics, 51(04), 520–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodliffe, J., & Hawkins, D. G. (2006). Explaining commitment: States and the convention against torture. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 358–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, A., & Sakamoto, A. (2005). Models of high skills in national competition strategies. In Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (Eds.), High skills: Globalization, competitiveness and skill formation (pp. 56–161). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guadalupe, M. (2007). Product market competition, returns to skill, and wage inequality. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 439–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, R. A., & Isuani, F. J. (2014). The emergence of state and social environmentalism in Argentina. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(2), 295–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(03), 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992a). Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International Organization, 46(01), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992b). Introductions: Epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention: The divisive politics of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In King, A. (Ed.), The new American political system. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Helbling, T., Mercer-Blackman, V., & Cheng, K. (2008). Riding a wave. Finance and Development, 45(1), 10–15.Google Scholar

Hellwig, T. (2014). Globalization and mass politics: Retaining the room to maneuver. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, Y. M. (2010). Mirrors of the economy: National accounts and international norms in Russia and beyond. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hicks, R. L., Parks, B. C., Roberts, J. T., & Tierney, M. J. (2008). Greening aid? Understanding the environmental impact of development assistance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochstetler, K. (2002). After the boomerang: Environmental movements and politics in the La Plata River basin. Global Environmental Politics, 2(4), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M. E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society: Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Hoel, M. (1992). International environment conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffer, A. J. (2013). Bureaucratic behavior: Budget cuts, imperfect information, and the 2013 sequester. Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar

Huber, E., & Solt, F. (2004). Successes and failures of neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2006). Politics, delegation, and bureaucracy. In Weingast, B. R. & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., & i Marín, X. F. (2011). The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: Channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 1343–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization, 46(03), 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamelarczyk, K. B. F., & Smith-Hall, C. (2014). REDD herring: Epistemic community control of the production, circulation and application of deforestation knowledge in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics, 46, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. B. (2013). Globalization and austerity politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapstein, E. B. (1992). Between power and purpose: Central bankers and the politics of regulatory convergence. International Organization, 46(01), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassenova, T. (2014). Brazil's nuclear kaleidoscope: An evolving identity. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Kauffman-Zeh, A. (1998). Brazil forced to cut back science funding. Nature, 395(6705), 831–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(03), 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(01), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinne, B. J. (2013). Network dynamics and the evolution of international cooperation. American Political Science Review, 107(04), 766–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtz, M. J. (2004). Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machin, S. (1996). Changes in the relative demand for skills. In Booth, A. & Snower, D. J. (Eds.), Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses (pp. 127–146). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madero, C. C., & Takacs, E. A. (1991). Política nuclear argentina: Avance o retroceso? Buenos Aires: Instituto de Publicaciones Navales.Google Scholar

Maggetti, M. (2014). Institutional change and the evolution of the regulatory state: Evidence from the Swiss case. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(02), 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Science Review, 94(02), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maoz, Z. (2012). Preferential attachment, homophily, and the structure of international networks, 1816–2003. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsden, P. V. (1983). Restricted access in networks and models of power. American Journal of Sociology, 88(04), 686–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, C. J. (2012). Political institutions and the origins of collective skill formation systems. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 41–67). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maxfield, S., & Schneider, B. R. (1997). Business and the state in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, K. U., & Solga, H. (2008). Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, N. (2014). Complexity, capacity, and capture. In Carpenter, D. and Moss, D. A. (Eds), Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it (pp. 99–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(01), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, K. M. (2009). Oil, nontax revenue, and the redistributional foundations of regime stability. International Organization, 63(01), 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, M. V. (2000). From populism to neoliberalism: Labor unions and market reforms in Latin America. World Politics, 52(02), 135–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, M. V. (2009). Political competition, partisanship, and policy making in Latin American public utilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, M. V., & Mangonnet, J. (2013). La economía política de la Argentina exportadora en el nuevo milenio: Proponiendo una nueva agenda de investigación. Desarrollo Económico, 53(209–210), 223–240.Google Scholar

Neumayer, E. (2001). How regime theory and the economic theory of international environmental cooperation can learn from each other. Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niskanen, W. A. (2007). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

O'Connell, P. J., & Jungblut, J.-M. (2008). What do we know about training at work? In Mayer, K. U. & Solga, H. (Eds), Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives (pp. 109–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donnell, G. (1978). State and alliances in Argentina, 1956–1976. The Journal of Development Studies, 15(1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 8–21.Google Scholar

Pavnick, N. (2000). What explains skill upgrading in less developed countries? NBER Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pernetta, J. C., & Bewers, J. M. (2012). Transboundary diagnostic analysis in international waters interventions funded by the global environment facility. Ocean & Coastal Management, 55, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(04), 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, K. T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raleigh, C. (2010). Political marginalization, climate change, and conflict in African Sahel states. International Studies Review, 12(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, K. (2002). Architecture of international cooperation: Transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. The Virginia Journal of International Law, 43(1), 1–92.Google Scholar

Roett, R. (1983). Democracy and debt in South America: A continent's dilemma. Foreign Affairs, 62(03), 695–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohrschneider, R., & Dalton, R. J. (2002). A global network? Transnational cooperation among environmental groups. The Journal of Politics, 64(02), 510–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudra, N., & Jensen, N. M. (2011). Globalization and the politics of natural resources. Comparative Political Studies, 44(6), 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (Vol. 118, p. 188). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sarkar, J. (2012). Big state, big science, big projects: The nuclear energy programme and state (un)-managerialism in India. Paper presented at the “Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance” International Conference, University of Sussex.Google Scholar

Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schiff, M., & Winters, L. A. (2002). Regional cooperation, and the role of international organizations and regional integration. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (2872).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, B. R. (1999). The Desarrollista State in Brazil and Mexico. In Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 276–305). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, B. R., & Heredia, B. (2003). Reinventing Leviathan: The politics of administrative reform in developing countries. Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar

Scholz, J. T., Berardo, R., & Kile, B. (2008). Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics, 70(02), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrank, A. (2009). Professionalization and probity in a patrimonial state: Labor inspectors in the Dominican Republic. Latin American Politics and Society, 51(2), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrank, A. (2014). The German roots of Latin American vocational training institution. Paper presented at the Red para el Estudio de la Economía Política de América Latina (REPAL), Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar

Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartzman, S. (1994). Brazil scientists and the state-evolving models and the “Great leap forward.” In Solingen, E. (Ed.), Scientists and the state: Domestic structures and the international context (pp. 171–188). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K. (1991). Ideas and institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, B. A., & Hopkins, D. J. (2005). The constraining power of international treaties: Theory and methods. American Political Science Review, 99(04), 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Slaughter, M. J. (2002). Skill upgrading in developing countries: Has inward foreign direct investment played a role? Working Paper 192. OECD Development Center, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Solingen, E. (1994). Scientists and the state: Domestic structures and the international context. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solingen, E. (1996). Industrial policy, technology, and international bargaining: Designing nuclear industries in Argentina and Brazil. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Stephenson, P. J., & Baharani, M. L. (2012). Evaluation techniques applied to large-scale regional projects. In De Lombaerde, P., Flores, R., Iapadre, L., & Schulz, M. (Eds.), The regional integration manual: Quantitative and qualitative methods (pp. 270–296). New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, W. (2012). Skills and politics: General and specific. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 317–352). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor-Robinson, M. M., & Heath, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women & Politics, 24(4), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teodoro, M. P. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K., Longstreth, F., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thurner, P. W., & Binder, M. (2009). European Union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation‐state? European Journal of Political Research, 48(1), 80–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008). Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulph, D. (1996). Dynamic competition for market share and the failure of the market for skilled labour. In Booth, A. L. & Snower, D. J. (Eds.), Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses (pp. 81–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velho, L. (2005). S&T institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 32(2), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Videras, J. (2013). Social networks and the environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Von Bülow, M. (2010). Building transnational networks: Civil society and the politics of trade in the Americas. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, M. (2004). Neoliberalism in Latin America: Good, bad, or incomplete? Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasmer, E. (2006). General versus specific skills in labor markets with search frictions and firing costs. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Webster, F. (2006). The Information Society revisited. In Lievrouw, L. A. & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 443–457). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Weyland, K. G. (2002). The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, K. G., Madrid, R. L., & Hunter, W. (2010). Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcoming. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wibbels, E. (2006). Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization, 60(02), 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Bank (2012). World Development Indicators 2012. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar

Wrobel, P. S., & Redick, J. R. (1998). Nuclear cooperation in South America: The role of scientists in the Argentine‐Brazilian rapprochement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 866(1), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Young, Z. (2002). A new green order? The World Bank and the politics of the Global Environment Facility. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar