Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:36:38.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Representativeness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

E. A. Wrigley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
R. S. Davies
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
J. E. Oeppen
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
R. S. Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The slow accumulation of completed reconstitutions by the Cambridge Group was a haphazard process. Those who volunteered to undertake a reconstitution made a choice from a list of parishes which had appeared prima facie to possess suitable registers. Alternatively, a local historian might write describing a register in which he or she was interested and suggest that a reconstitution was feasible. Such offers were normally accepted provided that further tests demonstrated that the register was indeed capable of sustaining a successful reconstitution, at least for a substantial period of time. There could therefore be no prior expectation that the set of reconstitutions would prove to reflect the behaviour of the nation as a whole. Such a coincidence was most unlikely. Nor did this seem unfortunate since the individual reconstitutions were intended to reflect extremes of local experience which would establish the extent of the variability of demographic characteristics, as they reflected local economic, geographical, and cultural peculiarities. Remote, upland pastoral economies; market towns engaged in handicraft industry and providing services; centres of early industrial growth; villages dependent chiefly on arable agriculture; such communities might be expected to differ from one another considerably.

Initial investigation, however, suggested that the improbable was happening as the total of reconstitutions reached and passed the two dozen mark. Just as with the 404 parishes which contributed data to the aggregative study, so with the reconstitution parishes, an attempt was made to collect certain standard items of information to enable the distinctive features of each parish to be specified.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×