Boshoff, S. P. E. (1921). Volk en taal van Suid-Afrika [People and Language of South Africa]. Pretoria: De Bussy.Google Scholar

Carstens, W. A. M. (2011). Norme vir Afrikaans [Norms for Afrikaans], 5th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar

Changuion, A. N. E. (1844). De Nederduitsche taal in Zuid-Afrika hersteld [The Low German Language Restored in South Africa]. Cape Town: Richert, Pike & Co.Google Scholar

Davids, Achmat (2011). The Afrikaans of the Cape Muslims: From 1815 to 1915. Pretoria: Protea.Google Scholar

Den Besten, Hans (2012). ‘From Khoekhoe foreigner talk via Hottentot Dutch to Afrikaans: the creation of a novel grammar’, in van der Wouden, Ton (ed.), Roots of Afrikaans: Selected Writings of Hans den Besten. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 257–88.Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana (2004). Language Standardization and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana (2005). ‘The unbearable lightness of being bilingual: English–Afrikaans language contact in South Africa’, Language Sciences 27: 113–35.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Bruce C. (1988). The Influence of English on Afrikaans. Pretoria: Serva.Google Scholar

Duchêne, Alexandre and Heller, Monica (eds.) (2007). Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the defence of Languages. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, Hans (1980). ‘Afrikaans in Johannesburg’, Taalfasette 27(2): 1–14.Google Scholar

Du Toit, S. J. (1880). Geskiedenis van die Afrikaanse taalbeweging ver vriend en vyand uit publieke en private bronne [History of the Afrikaans language Movement for Friend and Foe from Public and Private Sources]. Paarl: D. F. du Toit.Google Scholar

Du Toit, S. J. (1891). Afrikaans ons volkstaal: 71 Stellinge [Afrikaans our national language. 71 theses]. Paarl: D. F. du Toit.Google Scholar

Feinauer, A. E. (1989). ‘Plasing in Afrikaanse afhanklike sinne’ [Placement in dependent clauses in Afrikaans], South African Journal of Linguistics 7(1): 30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinauer, A. E. (1990) ‘Skoon afhanklike sinne in Afrikaanse spreektaal’ [Unmarked dependent clauses in spoken Afrikaans], South African Journal of Linguistics 8(3): 116–20.Google Scholar

Geerts, G., Haeseryn, W., de Rooij, J. and van den Toorn, M.C. (1984). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst [General Dutch Grammar]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar

Greig, Robert (2018). Considering Kaatje’, Litnet, www.litnet.co.za/considering-kaatje/ (last accessed 3 May 2018).Google Scholar

Heller, Monica and Duchêne, Alexandre (2007). ‘Discourses of endangerment: sociolinguistics, globalization, and social order’, Duchêne, Alexandre and Heller, Monica (eds.), Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Hoogenhout, C. P. ([?1881]1906). ‘Fooruitgang’ [Progress], in Afrikaanse Gedigte, Byeenfersameld uit wat in di laaste 30 Jaar verskyn is, 1876–1906 [Afrikaans Poetry, Collected from what has appeared in the last 30 years, 1876–1906]. Paarl: Paarl Drukpers Maatskappy Beperk.Google Scholar

Jansen van Vuuren, Marieta (2007). ‘Die Internet as platform vir ’n nuwe Afrikaanse taalgemeenskap en ’n nuwe variasie: ’n korpuslinguistiese ondersoek’ [The internet as a platform for a new Afrikaans speech community and new variation: a corpus linguistic analysis], unpublished PhD thesis, North-West University.Google Scholar

Kirsten, Johanita (2016). ‘Grammatikale verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010’ [Grammatical change in Afrikaans from 1911–2010], unpublished PhD thesis, North-West University.Google Scholar

Kruger, Haidee and Van Rooy, Bertus (2016). ‘Syntactic and pragmatic transfer effects in reported-speech constructions in three contact varieties of English influenced by Afrikaans’, Language Sciences 56: 118–31.Google Scholar

Le Roux, J. J. (1932). ‘Watter standpunt moet ons teenoor Anglisismes neem?’ [What standpoint should we adopt towards Anglicisms?], Die Taalgenoot, June/July.Google Scholar

Le Roux, J. J. (1939). Praatjies oor ons taal [Talks about Our Language]. Cape Town: Nasionale Pers.Google Scholar

Le Roux, J. J. (1952). Anglisismes [Anglicisms]. Cape Town: Nasionale Pers.Google Scholar

Mansvelt, N. (1884). Proeve van een Kaapsch-Hollandsch Idioticon [Samples of the Cape Dutch Lexicon] Cape Town: Van de Sandt, De Villiers, en co.Google Scholar

Marx, Hannelie and Milton, Viola Candice (2011). ‘Bastardised whiteness: “zef”-culture, Die Antwoord and the reconfiguration of contemporary Afrikaans identities’, Social Identities 17(6): 723–45.Google Scholar

McCormick, Kay (2002). Language in Cape Town’s District Six. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McLachlan, Tom (2016). ‘Die dierbare Engels’ [The dearest English], Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 56(2): 725–6.Google Scholar

McLachlan, Tom (2017). ‘Oor Afrikaans en sy voortbetstaan’ [About Afrikaans and its survival], Litnet, www.litnet.co.za/oor-afrikaans-en-sy-veelbesproke-voortbestaan-n-mening/ (last accessed 7 May 2018).Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1993). ‘Nineteenth-century attestations of English-Afrikaans code-mixing in the Cape’, Language Matters 24: 47–61.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2017). ‘South Africa and areal linguistics’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 527–50.Google Scholar

Odendal, F. F. (1960). ‘Versigtig met die woord Anglisisme’ [Careful with the word Anglicism]. Die Huisgenoot 42: 7 (11 November 1960).Google Scholar

Pienaar, E. C. (1943). Die Triomf van Afrikaans: Historiese oorsig oor die wording, ontwikkeling, skriftelike gebruik en uiteindelike erkenning van ons taal [The triumph of Afrikaans: An historical overview of the origin, development, written usage and ultimate recognition of our language]. Cape Town: Nasionale Pers Beperk.Google Scholar

Ponelis, Fritz (1979). Afrikaanse Sintaksis [Afrikaans Syntax]. Pretoria: J L van Schaik.Google Scholar

Ponelis, Fritz (1993). The Development of Afrikaans. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ponelis, Fritz (1999). ‘Afrikaans–English codeswitching and convergence’, Language Matters 30: 157–70.Google Scholar

Posthumus, M. J. (1969). ‘Die opkoms van Afrikaans as kultuurtaal sedert 1925’ [The rise of Afrikaans as language of high culture since 1925], in Van der Merwe, H. J. J. M. (ed.), Afrikaans: Sy aard en ontwikkeling. [Afrikaans: Its nature and development]. Pretoria: JL van Schaik, pp. 92–7.Google Scholar

Rousseau, H. J. (1937). Die invloed van Engels op Afrikaans, Deel 1: ’n Sosiologies-taalkundige ondersoek [The Influence of English on Afrikaans, Part 1: A sociological-linguistic investigation]. Cape Town: Maskew Miller.Google Scholar

Scholtz, J. du P. (1980). Wording en ontwikkeling van Afrikaans [Origin and Development of Afrikaans]. Cape Town: Tafelberg.Google Scholar

Schoonees, P. C. (1936). ‘Die gevaarlike Anglisisme’ [The dangerous Anglicism], Die Huisgenoot 20(757): 13, 95 (25 September 1936).Google Scholar

Scott, Mike (2016). WordSmith Tools Version 7.0. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software Limited.Google Scholar

Stell, Gerald (2009). ‘Codeswitching and ethnicity: grammatical types of codeswitching in the Afrikaans speech community’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 209: 103–28.Google Scholar

Stell, Gerald (2011). Ethnicity and Language Variation: Grammar and Code-Switching in the Afrikaans Speech Community. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Terblanche, H. J. (1946). ‘Wat is ’n Anglisisme?’ [What is an Anglicism?] Brandwag 10(466): 39 (Friday 6 September 1946).Google Scholar

Van Coller, H. P. (2012). ‘The beginnings of Afrikaans literature’, in Attwell, David and Attridge, Derek (eds.), The Cambridge History of South African Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–85.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus and van den Doel, Rias (2011). ‘Dutch and Afrikaans as post-pluricentric languages’, International Journal for the Sociology of Language 212: 1–22.Google Scholar

Willemse, Hein (2012). ‘Afrikaans literature, 1948–1976’, in Attwell, David and Attridge, Derek (eds.), The Cambridge History of South African Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 429–52.Google Scholar

Alleyne, Mervyn C. (2000). ‘Opposite process in “Creolization”’, in Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid and Schneider, Edgar (eds.), Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125–34.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto, Matthews, Stephen and Lim, Lisa (eds.) (2008). Deconstructing Creole. Typological Studies in Language 73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Arthur, Jay M. (1996). Aboriginal English, A Cultural Study. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Asher, R. E. 1985. Tamil. London: Croom Helm, http://wals.info/languoid/lect/wals_code_tml (last accessed 20 May 2019).Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy and Maynor, Natalie (1985). ‘The present tense of “be” in southern black folk speech’, American Speech 60: 195–213.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter, Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Parkvall, Mikael and Plag, Ingo (2011). ‘Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles’, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan (1993). ‘The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English’, in Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of the English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, pp. 187–213.Google Scholar

Benton, Richard A. (1991). ‘Maori English: a New Zealand myth?’, in Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–99.Google Scholar

Bhana, Surendra and Brain, Joy B. (1990). Setting Down Roots: Indian Migrants in South Africa, 1860–1911. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2004). ‘Indian English: syntax’, in Kortmann, Bernd and Schneider, Edgar W. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1016–30.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek (1975). Dynamics of a Creole System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek (1984). ‘The language bioprogram hypothesis’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–88.Google Scholar

Branford, William (1994). ‘English in South Africa’, in Burchfield, Robert W. (ed.), English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development [The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 5]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 430–96.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Holmberg, Anders and Almoaily, Mohammed (eds.) (2014). Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa–Europe Encounters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bughwan, Devamonie (1988). ‘An Investigation into the Use of English by the Indians in South Africa, with Special Reference to Natal’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of South Africa.Google Scholar

Butters, Ronald R. (2001). ‘Grammatical structure’, in Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America [The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 6]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–39.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel (2003). ‘Against Creole exceptionalism’, Language 79(2): 391–410.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel (2005). ‘Linguists’ most dangerous myth: the fallacy of Creole exceptionalism’, Language in Society 34(4): 533–91.Google Scholar

Detges, Ulrich (2000). ‘Two types of restructuring in French creoles: a cognitive approach to the genesis of tense markers’, in Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid and Schneider, Edgar (eds.), Degress of Restructuring in Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 135–62.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku (1997). ‘Cross-dialectal parallels and language contacts: evidence from Celtic Englishes’, in Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 943–57.Google Scholar

Harris, John (1991). ‘Conservatism versus substratal transfer in Irish English’, in Trudgill, Peter and Chambers, J. K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longman, pp. 191–212.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (1995). ‘An assessment of language contact in the development of Irish English’, in Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Language Change under Contact Conditions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 109–30.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (1997). ‘Arguments for creolisation in Irish English’, in Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 969–1038.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2003a). ‘Rectifying a standard deficiency: pronominal distinctions in varieties of English’, in Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series, Vol. 107 (Amsterdam: Benjamins), pp. 345–74.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2003b). ‘How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of New Dialect Formation’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–39.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2004a). ‘South Asian English’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 536–58.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2004b). A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin, NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2007). Irish English, Its History and Present-Day Forms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. (2004). ‘English input to Australia’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 418–39.Google Scholar

Kihm, Alan (2008). ‘Creoles, markedness and default settings: an appraisal’, in Kouwenberg, Silvia and Kingler, John (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Malden: Wiley, pp. 411–39.Google Scholar

Knooihuizen, Remco (2015). ‘Language shift and apparent standardisation in Early Modern English’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2): 189–211.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd (ed.) (2004). Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lanham, Len W. (1996). ‘A history of English in South Africa’, in de Klerk, Vivian (ed.), Focus on South Africa. Varieties of English Around the World, G15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger (1990). ‘Early mainland residues in Southern Hiberno-English’, in Dolan, Terence P. (ed.), The English of the Irish, Irish University Review, Special Issue 20:1. Dublin: n.p., pp. 137–48.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger and Wright, Susan (1986). ‘Endogeny vs. contact: Afrikaans influence on South African English’, English World-Wide 7, 201–23.Google Scholar

MacAulay, Donald (1992). The Celtic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Ian G. (2001). ‘Aboriginal English: Adopted code of a surviving culture’, in Blair, David and Collins, Peter (eds.), English in Australia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 201–22.Google Scholar

McArthur, Tom (2002). The Oxford Guide to World English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McCafferty, Kevin (2003). ‘Innovation in language contact Be after V-ing as a future gram in Irish English, 1670 to the present’, Diachronica 21(1): 113–60.Google Scholar

McCafferty, Kevin (2014). ‘“I dont care one cent what [Ø] goying on in Great Britten”’: Be-deletion in Irish English’, American Speech 89(4): 441–69.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John (1998). ‘Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class’, Language 74(4): 788–818.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John (2008). ‘Deconstructing creole’, Review of Deconstructing Creole by Umberto, Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews and Lisa Lim, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(2): 289–306.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John (2012). ‘Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis’, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 171–82.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John (2018). The Creole Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1992). English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of Indian South African English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1996). ‘Language contact, transmission, shift: Indian South African English’, in de Klerk, Vivian (ed.), Focus on South Africa. Varieties of English Around the World, G15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend 2002a. ‘From second language to first language: Indian South African English’, in Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 339–55.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2002). ‘Endogeny versus contact revisited: aspectual busy in South African English’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Collecting Views on Language Change. Special issue of Language Sciences, Vol. 24.1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 345–58.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2004). ‘Indian South African English: morphology and syntax’, in Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 974–92.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2008). World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael (2001). ‘British and Irish antecedents’, in Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America [The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–153.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. (2001). The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parkvall, Mikael (2008). ‘The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective’, in Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius and Karlsson, Fred (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 265–85.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo (2008). ‘Creoles as interlanguages: inflectional morphology’, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(1): 114–35.Google Scholar

Sabban, Annette (1984). ‘Investigations into the syntax of Hebridean English’, Scottish Language 3: 5–32.Google Scholar

Sakoda, Kent and Siegel, Jeff (2008). ‘Hawai’i Creole: morphology and syntax’, in Burridge, Kate and Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Varieties of English. Vol. 3: The Pacific and Australasia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 514–45.Google Scholar

Shukla, Shaligram 1981. Bhojpuri Grammar. Washington: Georgetown University Press, http://wals.info/languoid/lect/wals_code_bho (last accessed 20 May 2019).Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter (ed.) (2011). Linguistic Universals and Language Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter (2013). Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terence (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Watermeyer, Susan (1996). ‘Afrikaans English’, in de Klerk, Vivian (ed.), Focus on South Africa. Varieties of English Around the World, G15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiebesiek, Lisa (2007). ‘Addressing the ‘Standard English Debate’ in South Africa: the case of South African Indian English’, unpublished masters dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald (1997–8). ‘On the origins of African American Vernacular English: a creolist perspective’, Diachronica 14(2): 305–44; 15(1): 99–154.Google Scholar

WALS (World Atlas of Language Structures Online) (2013). ‘Chapter 68: The Perfect’, wals.info/chapter/68 (last accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar

Wright, Susan (1997). ‘“Ah’m going for to give youse a story today”: Remarks on second person plural pronouns in Englishes’, in Cheshire, Jenny L. and Stein, Dieter (eds.), Taming the Vernacular: From Dialect to Written Standard Language. London: Longman, pp. 170–84.Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Christine (2009). ‘Bilingualism and language shift in Western Cape communities’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 61–76.Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Christine (2013). ‘“With English the world is more open to you”: language shift as marker of social transformation’, English Today 113(29): 28–35.Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Christine and George, Erica (2003). ‘Family languages: bilingualism and language shift’, paper presented at the Twenty-First World Congress of the World Federation of Modern Languages Association, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.Google Scholar

Antonie, Alexa N. (2009). ‘Profiling bilingualism in a historically Afrikaans community on the Beaufort West Hooyvlakte’, unpublished Master’s dissertation, University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar

Bangeni, Bongi and Kapp, Rochelle (2007). ‘Shifting language attitudes in a linguistically diverse learning environment in South Africa’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28: 253–69.Google Scholar

Beukes, Johannes Daniel (2015). ‘Language shift within two generations: Afrikaans mother tongue parents raising English mother tongue children’, unpublished Master’s dissertation, University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar

Bosch, Barbara (2000). ‘Ethnicity markers in Afrikaans’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 144: 51–68.Google Scholar

Busch, Brigitta (2016). ‘Categorizing languages and speakers: why linguists should mistrust census data and statistics’, Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 189: 1–18.Google Scholar

Casale, Daniela and Posel, Dorrit (2011). ‘English language proficiency and earnings in a developing country: the case of South Africa’, Journal of Socio-Economics 40: 385–93.Google Scholar

Coetzee-Van Rooy, Susan (2012). ‘Flourishing functional multilingualism: evidence from language repertoires in the Vaal Triangle region’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 218: 11–21.Google Scholar

Coetzee-Van Rooy, Susan (2013). ‘Afrikaans in contact with English: endangered language or case of exceptional bilingualism’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 224: 179–207.Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim (1979). ‘Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters’, Working Papers on Bilingualism 19: 121–9.Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim (1980). ‘The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue’, TESOL Quarterly 14(2): 175–87.Google Scholar

DAC (2003). National Language Policy Framework. Pretoria: Department of Arts and Culture.Google Scholar

Dalvit, Lorenzo and de Klerk, Vivian (2005). ‘Attitudes of Xhosa-speaking students at the University of Fort Hare towards the use of Xhosa as language of learning and teaching (LOLT)’, Southern African Journal of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 23(1): 1–18.Google Scholar

DBE (2010). The Status of the Language of Learning and Teaching (LOLT) in South African Public Schools: A Quantitative Overview. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar

De Kadt, Elizabeth (2002). ‘Gender and usage patterns of English in South African urban and rural contexts’, World Englishes 21: 83–97.Google Scholar

De Kadt, Elizabeth (2005). ‘English, language shift and identities: a comparison between ‘Zulu-dominant’ and ‘multicultural’ students on a South African university campus’, Southern African Journal of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 23(1): 19–37.Google Scholar

De Klerk, Vivian (2000). ‘Language shift in Grahamstown: a case study of selected Xhosa-speakers’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 146: 87–110.Google Scholar

De Klerk, Vivian and Bosch, Barbara (1998). ‘Afrikaans to English: a case study of language shift’, South African Journal of Linguistics 16(2): 43–51.Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana (2010). ‘Tracking the demographics of (urban) language shift: an analysis of South African census data’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 31(1): 13–35.Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana and Mabandla, Nkululkeo (2006). ‘i-Dollar eyi one! Language, communication networks and economic participation, towards an inclusive economy’, paper presented at the Development Policy Research Unit/Trade and Industrial Policy Conference, Johannesburg.Google Scholar

Dyers, Charlyn (2004). ‘Ten years of democracy: attitudes and identity among some South African school children’, Per Linguam 20(1): 22–35.Google Scholar

Dyers, Charlyn (2008a). ‘Language shift or maintenance? Factors determining the use of Afrikaans among township youth in South Africa’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 49–72.Google Scholar

Dyers, Charlyn (2008b). ‘Truncated multilingualism or language shift? An examination of language use in intimate domains in a new non-racial working class township in South Africa’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 29(2): 110–26.Google Scholar

Farmer, Jean and Anthonissen, Christine (2010). ‘Transitions and translations to English in schools of the Helderberg area’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 39: 1–23.Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua A. (1964). ‘Language maintenance and language shift as a field of inquiry’, Linguistics 9: 32–70.Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua A. (1966). Language Loyalty in the United States; The Maintenance and Perpetuation of Non-English Mother Tongues by American Ethnic and Religious Groups. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua A. (2004). ‘Language maintenance, language shift, and reversing language shift’, in Bhatia, Tej K. and Ritchie, William C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism. Malden/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell, pp. 406–36.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan (1979). Language Shift: Social Determinants of Language Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar (1953). The Norwegian Language in America, 2 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Heugh, Kathleen (2005). ‘Mother tongue education is best’, HSRC Review 3(3): 6–7.Google Scholar

Hunter, Mark and Hachimi, Atiqa (2012). ‘Talking race, talking class: language, class and race in the call center industry in South Africa’, Social and Cultural Geography 13(6): 551–66.Google Scholar

Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. (2003). ‘Social change and language shift in South Africa’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 23: 225–42.Google Scholar

Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. (2007). ‘One language, multi-layered identities: English in a society in transition, South Africa’, World Englishes 26(3): 263–75.Google Scholar

Kroll, Judith F., Dussias, Paola E., Bice, Kinsey and Perrotti, Lauren (2015). ‘Bilingualism, mind and brain’, Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 377–94.Google Scholar

Lieberson, Stanley and Curry, Timothy J. (1971). ‘Language shift in the United States: some demographic clues’, International Migration Review 5(2): 125–37.Google Scholar

Makoni, Sinfree and Pennycook, Alastair 2005. ‘Disinventing and (re)constituting languages’, Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 2(3): 137–56.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1992). English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1996). ‘Language contact, transmission, shift: South African Indian English’, in de Klerk, Vivian (ed.), Focus on South Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 79–97.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2002). ‘From second language to first language: Indian South African English’, in Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 339–55.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2008). ‘Trajectories of language endangerment in South Africa’, in Vigouroux, Cécile B. and Mufwene, Salikoko S. (eds.), Globalization and Language Vitality: Perspectives from Africa. London/New York: Continuum, pp. 32–50.Google Scholar

Portes, Alejandro and Schauffler, Richard (1994). ‘Language and the second generation: bilingualism yesterday and today’, International Migration Review 28(4): 640–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posel, Dorrit and Zeller, Jochen (2016). ‘Language shift or increased bilingualism in South Africa: evidence from census data’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37(4): 357–70.Google Scholar

Probyn, Margie (2009). ‘“Smuggling the vernacular into the classroom”: conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching in township/rural schools in South Africa’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12(2): 123–36.Google Scholar

Rudwick, Stephanie (2004). ‘“Zulu, we need [it] for our culture”: Umlazi adolescents in the post-apartheid state’, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 22: 159–72.Google Scholar

Rudwick, Stephanie (2008). ‘“Coconuts” and “oreos”: English-speaking Zulu-people in a South African township’, World Englishes 27: 101–16.Google Scholar

South African Population Census (1996). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar

South African Population Census (2001). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar

South African Population Census (2011). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar

Thutloa, Alfred Mautsane and Huddlestone, Kate (2011). ‘Afrikaans as an index of identity among Western Cape Coloured communities’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 40: 57–73.Google Scholar

Verdoodt, Albert F. 1997. ‘The demography of language’, in Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 33–43.Google Scholar

Webb, Vic (2002). Language in South Africa: The Role of Language in National Transformation, Reconstruction and Development. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel (1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Alexander, Neville (2000). ‘English unassailable but unattainable: the dilemma of language policy in South African education’, PRAESA Occasional Papers 3. Cape Town: PRAESA.Google Scholar

Bentahila, Abdelali and Davies, Eirlys E. (1983). ‘The syntax of Arabic–French code-switching’, Lingua 59(4): 301–30.Google Scholar

Bernsten, Janice (1990). ‘The integration of English loans in Shona: social correlates and linguistic consequences’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

De Klerk, Vivian (2000a). ‘Language shift in Grahamstown: a case study of selected Xhosa-speakers’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 146: 87–110.Google Scholar

De Klerk, Vivian (2000b). ‘To be Xhosa or not to be Xhosa … that is the question’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21: 198–215.Google Scholar

Edwards, John (1994). Multilingualism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Rosalie and Slabbert, Sarah (1997). ‘“We just mix”: code-switching in a South African township’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 125: 65–98.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Rosalie, Calteaux, Karen and Myers-Scotton, Carol (1998). ‘Orderly mixing and accommodation in South African codeswitching’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(3): 395–420.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar (1950). ‘The analysis of linguistic borrowing’, Language 26: 210–31.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania (2003). ‘On contact-induced grammaticalization’, Studies in Language 27(3): 529–72.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2010). ‘Language contact: reassessment and reconsideration’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger (2002). ‘South African English’, in Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–26.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (1992). English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2008). ‘“I’ve been speaking Tsotsitaal all my life without noticing it”: towards a unified account of Tsotsitaals in South Africa’, in Meyerhoff, Miriam and Nagy, Naomi (eds.), Social Lives in Language: Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Hurst, Ellen (2013). ‘Slang registers, code-switching and restructured urban varieties in South Africa: an analytic overview of tsotsitaal with special reference to the Cape Town variety’, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28(1):103–30.Google Scholar

Mougeon, Raymond and Beniak, Edouard (1991). Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol (1992). ‘Comparing codeswitching and borrowing’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 13: 19–39.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol (1993). Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol (2004). ‘Precision tuning of the Matrix Language Frame (MLF) model of codeswitching’, Sociolinguistica 18: 106–17.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol and Jake, Janice (2000). ‘Four types of morphemes: evidence from aphasia, codeswitching, and second language acquisition’, Linguistics 38(6): 1053–100.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol and Jake, Janice (2001). ‘Explaining aspects of code-switching and their implications’, in Nicol, Janet (ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell, pp. 84–116.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol and Jake, Janice (2009). ‘A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing’, in Bullock, Barbara and Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 336–57.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol and Jake, Janice (2017). ‘Revisiting the 4-M model: codeswitching and morpheme election at the abstract level’, International Journal of Bilingualism 21(3): 340–66.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Sankoff, David and Miller, Christopher (1988). ‘The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation’, Linguistics 26: 47–104.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Huddleston, Rodney (2002). ‘Prepositions and prepositional phrases’, in Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcom (2001). ‘Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in North-West Melanesia’, in Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Genetic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 134–66.Google Scholar

Simango, Silvester Ron (2011). ‘When English meets isiXhosa in the clause: an exploration into the grammar of codeswitching’, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 29: 127–34.Google Scholar

Simango, Silvester Ron (2015). ‘“Amaphi ama-subject eniwa-enjoy-ayo esikolweni?”: language practices among bilingual learners in the Eastern Cape’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 234: 77–91.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel (1968). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Altmann, Heidi and Kabak, Barış (2015). ‘English word stress in L2 and postcolonial varieties’, in Gut, Ulrike, Fuchs, Robert and Wunder, Eva-Maria (eds.), Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 185–207.Google Scholar

Atterer, Michaela and Ladd, Robert D. (2004). ‘On the phonetics and phonology of segmental anchoring of F0: evidence from German’, Journal of Phonetics 32: 177–97.Google Scholar

Atoye, Raphael O. (2005). ‘Non-native perception and interpretation of English intonation’, Nordic Journal of African Studies 14(1): 26–42.Google Scholar

Baker, Rachel E. (2010). ‘Non-native perception of native English prominence’, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010 100171, 1–4. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Bekker, Ian (2009). ‘The vowels of South African English’, unpublished PhD thesis, North-West University.Google Scholar

Breen, Mara, Fedorenko, Evelina, Wagner, Michael and Gibson, Edward (2010). ‘Acoustic correlates of information structure’, Language and Cognitive Processes 25(7–9): 1044–98.Google Scholar

Bowerman, Sean (2004). ‘White South African English: phonology’, in Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Kortmann, Bernd, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 931–42.Google Scholar

Bullock, Barbara E. (2009). ‘Prosody in contact in French: a case study from a heritage variety in the USA’, International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 165–94.Google Scholar

Coetzee, Andries W. and Wissing, Daan P. (2007). ‘Global and local durational properties in three varieties of South African English’, Linguistic Review 24: 263–89.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian (2005). Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speaker’s Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Da Silva, Arista B. (2008). ‘South African English: a sociolinguistic investigation of an emerging variety’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

De Leeuw, Esther, Mennen, Ineke, and Scobbie, James M. (2012). ‘Singing a different tune in your native language: first language attrition of prosody’, International Journal of Bilingualism 16(1): 101–16.Google Scholar

Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastian, Nuria, and Mehler, Jacques (1997). ‘A destressing “deafness” in French?’, Journal of Memory and Language 36: 406–21.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline, Pandey, Pramod, and Kentner, Gerrit (2016). ‘The prosody of Focus and Givenness in Hindi and Indian English’, Studies in Language 40(2): 302–39.Google Scholar

Fung, Ho Sze Holly, and Mok, Peggy (2014). ‘Realization of narrow focus in Hong Kong English declaratives: a pilot study’, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, Dublin 2014. Dublin, pp. 964–8.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos (2015). ‘On the intonation of tonal varieties of English’, in Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Sharma, Devyani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 569–98.Google Scholar

Gut, Ulrike (2016). ‘Question intonation in Brunei English’, World Englishes 35(4): 529–41.Google Scholar

Gut, Ulrike and Pillai, Stefanie (2015). ‘The question intonation of Malay speakers of English’, in Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Avanzi, Mathieu, and Herment, Sophie (eds.), Prosody and Languages in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition, Languages in Multilingual Situations. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar

Gut, Ulrike, Pillai, Stefanie, and Don, Zuraidah Mohd (2013). ‘The prosodic marking of information status in Malaysian English’, World Englishes 32(2): 185–97.Google Scholar

Hellmuth, Samantha (2005). ‘No de-accenting in (or of) phrases: evidence from Arabic for crosslinguistic and cross-dialectal prosodic variation’, in Frota, Sónia (ed.), Prosodies. Berlin: De Gruyter: pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

Hoot, Bradley (2017). ‘Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax–discourse interface’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7(1): 63–95.Google Scholar

Ip, Kwan Ho Martin and Cutler, Anne (2017). ‘Intonation facilitates prediction of focus even in the presence of lexical tones’ in Proceedings of Interspeech, Stockholm 2017. Stockholm: ISCA, pp. 1218–22.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, and Upton, Clive (eds.) (2004). A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. 2 Vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred (2008). ‘Basic notions of information structure’, Acta Linguistica Hungaria 55: 243–76.Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D. (1996). Intonational Phonology. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liang, Jie and van Heuven, Vincent J. (2007). ‘Chinese tone and intonation perceived by L1 and L2 listeners’, in Truckendbrodt, Hubert, Gussenhoven, Carlos, and Riad, Tomas (eds.), Tones and Tunes, Volume 2: Experimental Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 27–62.Google Scholar

Lomotey, Charlotte Fofo (2017). ‘Contrastive focus in Ghanaian English discourse’, World Englishes 36(1): 60–79.Google Scholar

Mackey, William F. (2000). ‘The description of bilingualism’, in Wei, Li (ed.), The Bilingualism Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 22–50.Google Scholar

Marinis, Theodoros (2010). ‘Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research’, in Blom, Elma and Unsworth, Sharon (eds.), Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–62.Google Scholar

Maxwell, Olga (2014). ‘The intonational phonology of Indian English: an autosegmental-metrical analysis based on Bengali and Kannada English’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Mennen, Ineke (2004). ‘Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek’, Journal of Phonetics 32(4): 543–63.Google Scholar

Mennen, Ineke (2015). ‘Beyond segments: towards an L2 intonation learning theory (LILT)’, in Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Avanzi, Mathieu, and Herment, Sophie (eds.), Prosody and Languages in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition, Languages in Multilingual Situations. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 171–88.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2004). ‘Synopsis: the phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia’, in Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Vol. I. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1099–110.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend (2010). ‘Socio-phonetics and Social Change: deracialisation of the GOOSE vowel in South African English’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 3–33.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2008). World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Minow, Verena (2010). Variation in the Grammar of Black South African English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Nayan, Noor Mat and Setter, Jane (2016). ‘Malay English intonation: the cooperative rise’, English World-Wide 37(3): 293–322.Google Scholar

Puri, Vandana (2013). ‘Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne.Google Scholar

Queen, Robin M. (2001). ‘Bilingual intonation patterns: evidence of language change from Turkish–German bilingual children’, Language in Society 30: 55–80.Google Scholar

Queen, Robin M. (2006). ‘Phrase-final intonation in narratives told by Turkish–German bilinguals’, International Journal of Bilingualism 10(2): 153–78.Google Scholar

Raborife, Mpho, Turco, Giuseppina and Zerbian, Sabine (2016). ‘The prosody of focus and emphasis in Sepedi’, Proceedings of PRASA, Stellenbosch 2016. Stellenbosch: IEEE, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

Snedeker, Jesse and Trueswell, John (2003). ‘Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: effects of speaker awareness and referential context’, Journal of Memory and Language 48: 103–30.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella and Filiaci, Francesca (2006). ‘Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian’, Second Language Research 22(3): 339–68.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella (2011). ‘Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 1–33.Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc (2007). ‘Contrast and accent in Dutch and Romanian’, Journal of Phonetics 35(3): 380–97.Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc and Zerbian, Sabine (2010). ‘Intonational differences between L1 and L2 English in South Africa’, Phonetica 67: 127–146.Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc, Krahmer, Emiel, and Avesani, Cinzia (2002). ‘Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis’, Journal of Phonetics 30(4): 629–54.Google Scholar

Van Rijswijk, Remy (2016). The Strength of a Weaker First Language: Language Production and Comprehension by Turkish Heritage Speakers in the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Van Rijswijk, Remy, Muntendam, Antje, and Dijkstra, Ton (2017). ‘Focus marking in Dutch by heritage speakers of Turkish and Dutch L1 speakers’, Journal of Phonetics 61: 48–70.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus (2002). ‘Stress placement in Tswana English: the makings of a coherent system’, World Englishes 21(1): 146–60.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus (2004). ‘Black South African English: phonology’, in Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, and Upton, Clive (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool: Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 943–52.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus (2008). ‘Black South African English: phonology’, in Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Varieties of English 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 177–87.Google Scholar

Wissing, Daan (2002). ‘Black South African English: a new English? Observations from a phonetic viewpoint’, World Englishes 20(1): 129–44.Google Scholar

Wu, Wing Li, and Yi, Xu (2010). ‘Prosodic focus in Hong Kong Cantonese without post-focus compression’, paper presented at Speech Prosody 2010 Fifth International Conference, May 10–14, Chicago.Google Scholar

Xu, Yi (1999). ‘Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours’, Journal of Phonetics 27: 55–105.Google Scholar

Xu, Yi and Xu, Ching X. (2005). ‘Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation’, Journal of Phonetics 33: 159–97.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2006). ‘Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho’, unpublished PhD dissertation. Humboldt-University.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2010). ‘Recent developments in the typology of intonation’, Linguistics and Language Compass 4(9): 874–89.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2012). ‘Stress assignment in Black South African English’, in Ndinga-Koumba-Binza, Hugues Steve and Bosch, Sonja E. (eds.), Language Science and Language Technology in Africa: Festschrift for Justus C. Roux. Stellenbosch: Sun Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2013). ‘Prosodic marking of narrow focus across varieties of South African English’, English World-Wide 34(1): 26–47.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2015a). ‘Prosodic marking of focus in transitive sentences in varieties of South African English’, in Gut, Ulrike, Fuchs, Robert, and Wunder, Eva-Maria (eds.), Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 209–40.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2015b). ‘Syntactic and prosodic focus in contact varieties of South African English’, English World-Wide 36(2): 228–58.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2015c). ‘Markedness considerations in L2 prosodic focus and givenness marking’, in Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Avanzi, Mathieu, and Herment, Sophie (eds.), Prosody and Languages in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition, Languages in Multilingual Situations. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine (2016). ‘Intonation in Sotho-Tswana’, in Downing, Laura J. and Rialland, Annie (eds.), Intonation in African Tone Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter pp. 393–433.Google Scholar

Aquino, Lalaine F. Yanilla (2012). ‘The effects of bilingual instruction on the literacy skills of young learners’, Working Papers on Bilingualism 4: 1–13.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Elizabeth and Kamil, Michael L. (1995). ‘Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses’, Applied Linguistics 16: 5–34.Google Scholar

Bialystok, Ellen, Majumder, Shilpi and Martin, Michelle M. (2003). ‘Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage?’, Applied Psycholinguistics 24: 27–44.Google Scholar

Biemiller, Andrew (2003). ‘Vocabulary: needed if more children are to read well’, Reading Psychology 24: 323–35.Google Scholar

Both-de Vries, Anna C. and Bus, Adriana G. (2008). ‘Name writing: a first step to phonetic writing?’, Literacy Teaching and Learning 12(2): 37–55.Google Scholar

Carlisle, Joanne F., Beeman, Margaret, Davis, Lyle Hull and Spharim, Galila (1999). ‘Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual’, Applied Psycholinguistics 20: 459–78.Google Scholar

Castles, Anne and Coltheart, Max (2004). ‘Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?’, Cognition 91: 77–111.Google Scholar

Chow, Bonnie Wing Yin, McBride-Chang, Catherine and Burgess, Stephen (2005). ‘Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergarteners learning to read English as a second language’, Journal of Educational Psychology 97(1): 81–7.Google Scholar

Clarke, Mark A (1988). ‘The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading: or when language competence interferes with reading performance’, in Carrell, Patricia, Devine, Joanne and Eskey, David (eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–24.Google Scholar

Cui, Yanping (2007). ‘L2 proficiency and L2 reading: consolidating the linguistic threshold hypothesis’, Applied Linguistics 12(4): 1–8.Google Scholar

Cummins, James (1991). ‘Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children’, in Bialystok, E. (ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–89.Google Scholar

Cummins, James (2005). ‘Teaching for cross-language transfer in dual language education: possibilities and pitfalls’, www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/new-resource-library/symposium-on-dual-language-education-3.pdf?sfvrsn=0&sfvrsn=0 (last accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

Deacon, Hélène and Cain, Kate (2011). ‘What we have learned from “learning to read in more than one language”’, Journal of Research in Reading 34(1): 1–5.Google Scholar

De Schryver, Gilles-Maurice, Mogodi, M. P. and Taljard, Elsabe (eds.) (2007). Oxford Bilingual School Dictionary: Northern Sotho and English. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diaz, Raphael M. and Klingler, Cynthia (1991). ‘Towards an explanatory model of the interaction between bilingualism and cognitive development’, in Bialystok, Ellen (ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–92.Google Scholar

Dickinson, David K., McCabe, Allyssa, Clarke-Chiarelli, Nancy and Wolf, Anne (2004). ‘Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness in low-income Spanish and English bilingual preschool children’, Applied Psycholinguistics 25(1): 323–47.Google Scholar

Dunn, Lloyd M. and Dunn, Leota M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th ed. Bloomington: Pearson.Google Scholar

Farkas, George and Beron, Kurt (2004). ‘The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: differences by class and race’, Social Science Research 33(3): 464–97.Google Scholar

Geva, Esther (2006). ‘Learning to read in a second language: research, implications, and recommendations for services’, Encyclopaedia on Early Childhood Development 1: 1–12.Google Scholar

Geva, Esther and Siegel, Linda S. (2000). ‘Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12(1–2): 1–30.Google Scholar

Graves, Michael F. (2016). The Vocabulary Book: Learning and Instruction. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, Francois (2010). Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haigh, Corinne A., Savage, Robert, Erdos, Caroline and Genesee, Fred (2011). ‘The role of phoneme awareness and onset rime in second language reading acquisition’, Journal of Research in Reading 34(1): 94–113.Google Scholar

Hemphill, Lowry and Tivnan, Terrance (2008). ‘The importance of early vocabulary for literacy achievement in high-poverty schools’, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 13: 426–51.Google Scholar

Hu, Marcella and Nation, Paul (2000). ‘Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension’, Reading in a Foreign Language 13: 403–30.Google Scholar

Jiang, Nan (2004). ‘Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language’, The Modern Language Journal 88(3): 416–32.Google Scholar

Jiang, Xiangying (2011). ‘The role of first language literacy and second language proficiency in second language reading comprehension’, The Reading Matrix 11(2): 177–90.Google Scholar

Laufer, Batia and Nation, Paul (2014). ‘Vocabulary’, in Gass, Susan M. and Mackey, Alison (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 163–76.Google Scholar

Leafstedt, Jill M. and Gerber, Michael M. (2005). ‘Crossover of phonological processing skills: a study of Spanish-speaking students in two instructional settings’, Remedial and Special Education 26: 226–35.Google Scholar

Makaure, Patricia (2017). ‘Phonological processing and teading fevelopment in Northern Sotho–English bilingual children’, unpublished MA Dissertation, University of South Africa.Google Scholar

Mojela, Victor Maropeng (2002). ‘The cause of urban slang and its effect on the development of the Northern Sotho Lexicon’, Lexikos 12: 201–10.Google Scholar

Musk, Nigel (2005). ‘The vowels and consonants of English’, Linguistics 2(1): 1–5.Google Scholar

Nation, Paul (2006). ‘How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?’, Canadian Modern Language Review 63: 59–82.Google Scholar

Peregoy, Suzanne F. and Boyle, Owen F. (2000). ‘English learners reading English: what we know, what we need to know’, Theory into Practice 39(4): 237–47.Google Scholar

Port, Robert F. (2007). ‘The graphical basis of phones and phonemes’, in Bohn, Ocke-Schwen and Monroe, Murray J. (eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. New York: Johns-Benjamins, pp. 349–65.Google Scholar

Ramus, Frank, Dupoux, Emmanuel and Mehler, Jacques (2003). ‘The psychological reality of rhythm classes: perceptual studies’, Cognition 48: 337–42.Google Scholar

Shankweiler, Donald and Fowler, Anne (2004). ‘Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 17: 483–515.Google Scholar

Share, David L. (2004). ‘Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: a causal connection’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 88: 213–33.Google Scholar

Soares de Sousa, Diane, Greenop, Kirsten and Fry, Jessica (2010). ‘The effects of phonological awareness of Zulu-speaking children learning to spell in English: a study of cross-language transfer’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 517–33.Google Scholar

Spira, Elana Greenfield, Bracken, Stacy Storch and Fischel, Janet E. (2005). ‘Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: the effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills’, Developmental Psychology 41: 225–34.Google Scholar

Taillefer, Gail (1996). ‘L2 reading ability: further insight into the short-circuit hypothesis’, Modern Language Journal 80(4): 461–77.Google Scholar

Thamaga, Lesetje J. (2012). ‘IsiNdebele influence on Sepedi learners around the Dennilton region in the Limpopo province’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar

Treiman, Rebecca (2017). ‘Learning to spell: phonology and beyond’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 3: 83–93.Google Scholar

TshwaneDJe (Language Software and Services) (2017). Sesotho sa Leboa (Northern Sotho)-English Dictionary, http://africanlanguages.com/sdp/index.php?l=en (last accessed 21 May 2019).Google Scholar

Veii, Kazuvire and Everatt, John (2005). ‘Predictors of reading among Herero–English bilingual Namibian school children’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8(3): 239–54.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, Ludo (2007). ‘Early bilingualism, language transfer, and phonological awareness’, Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 425–39.Google Scholar

Wagner, Richard K., Torgesen, Joseph K. and Rashotte, Carol A. (1994). ‘Development of reading-related PP abilities: new evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study’, Developmental Psychology 30(1): 73–87.Google Scholar

Wagner, Richard K., Torgesen, Joseph K., Rashotte, Carol A. and Pearson, Nils A. (2013). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing – Second Edition. Examiner’s Manual. San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar

Wang, Min, Koda, Keiko and Perfetti, Charles A. (2003). ‘Alphabetic and non-alphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese–English L2 learners’, Cognition 87: 129–49.Google Scholar

Wei, Michael and Zhou, Yalun (2013). ‘Transfer of phonological awareness from Thai to English among grade three students in Thailand’, The Reading Matrix 13(1): 1–13.Google Scholar

Wilsenach, Carien (2013). ‘Phonological skills as predictor of reading success: an investigation of emergent bilingual Northern Sotho/English learners’, Per Linguam. A Journal of Language Learning 29(2): 17–32.Google Scholar

Wood, Clare and Connelly, Vincent (2009). ‘Introduction: contempory perspectives on reading and spelling’, in Wood, Clare and Connelly, Vincent (eds.), Contempory Perspectives on Reading and Spelling. London and NewYork: Routledge, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

Yamashita, Junko (2002). ‘Mutual compensation between L1 reading ability and L2 language proficiency in L2 reading comprehension’, Journal of Research in Reading 25(1): 81–95.Google Scholar

Aarons, Deborah (1994). ‘Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language’, unpublished PhD thesis, Boston University.Google Scholar

Akach, Philemon (1997). ‘The grammar of sign language’, Language Matters 28: 7–35.Google Scholar

Baker-Shenk, Charlotte (1983). ‘A microanalysis of the nonmanual components of questions in American Sign Language’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of California.Google Scholar

Baker-Shenk, Charlotte and Cokely, David (1981). American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar

Bank, Richard, Crasborn, Onno and Van Hout, Roeland (2015). ‘Alignment of two languages: the spreading of mouthings in Sign Language of the Netherlands’, International Journal of Bilingualism 19(1): 40–55.Google Scholar

Bank, Richard, Crasborn, Onno and Van Hout, Roeland (2016). ‘The prominence of spoken language elements in a sign language’, Linguistics 54(6): 1281–1306.Google Scholar

Boyes Braem, Penny (2001). ‘Functions of the mouthings in the signing of Deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS)’, in Boyes Braem, Penny and Sutton-Spence, Rachel (eds.), The Hands are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. Hamburg: Signum Press, pp. 99–132.Google Scholar

Caponigro, Ivano and Davidson, Kathryn (2011). ‘Ask, and tell as well: clausal question-answer pairs in ASL’, Natural Language Semantics 19(4): 323–71.Google Scholar

Crasborn, Onno, van der Kooij, Els, Waters, Dafydd, Woll, Bencie and Mesch, Johanna (2008). ‘Frequency distribution and spreading behaviour of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages’, Sign Language and Linguistics 11(1): 45–67.Google Scholar

Crasborn, Onno, Van der Kooij, Els, Ros, Johan and de Hoop, Helen (2009). ‘Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands)’, Linguistic Review 26: 355–70.Google Scholar

Davis, Jeffrey (1990). ‘Linguistic transference and interference: interpreting between English and ASL’, in Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues. Washington: Gallaudet University Press, pp. 308–21.Google Scholar

De Beuzevillea, Louise, Johnston, Trevor and Schembri, Adam (2009). ‘The use of space with indicating verbs in Aslan: a corpus-based investigation’, Sign Language and Linguistics 12(1): 53–82.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew (1997). ‘Are grammatical relations universal?’, in Bybee, Joan, Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 115–43.Google Scholar

Emmory, Karen, Borinstein, Helsa B. and Thompson, Robin (2005). ‘Bimodal bilingualism: code-blending between spoken English and American Sign Language’, in Cohen, James, McAlister, Kara, Rolstad, Kellie and MacSwan, Jeff (eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, pp. 663–73.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria, Rodman, Robert and Hyams, Nina (2007). An Introduction to Language. 8th ed. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (2010). ‘Language contact: reconsideration and reassessment’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry, O’Dea, Barbara and Shaffer, Barbara 2001. ‘The construal of events: passives in American Sign Language’, Sign Language Studies 1(3): 281–310.Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor (2016). ‘Auslan corpus annotation guidelines’, http://media.auslan.org.au/attachments/Auslan_Corpus_Annotation_Guidelines_November2016.pdf (last accessed 21 May 2019).Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor, Van Roekel, Jane and Schembri, Adam (2016). ‘On the conventionalization of mouth actions in Australian Sign Language’, Language and Speech 59(1): 3–42.Google Scholar

Kimmelman, Vadim (2012). ‘Word order in Russian Sign Language’, Sign Language Studies 12(3): 414–44.Google Scholar

Kimmelman, Vadim and Pfau, Roland (2016). ‘Information structure in sign languages’, in Féry, Caroline and Ishihara, Shinichiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 814–33.Google Scholar

Leeson, Lorraine (2005). ‘Making the effort in simultaneous interpreting: some considerations for signed language interpreters’, in Janzen, Terry (ed.), Topics in Signed Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar

Leeson, Lorraine and Saeed, John (2012). Irish Sign Language: A Cognitive Linguistic Account. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott (1980). American Sign Language Syntax. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott (2003). Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane and Meier, Richard (2011). ‘On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages’, Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4): 95–141.Google Scholar

Lucas, Ceil and Valli, Clayton (1990). ‘ASL, English and contact signing’, in Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues. Washington: Gallaudet University Press, pp. 288–307.Google Scholar

Mohr, Susannah (2014). Mouth Actions in Sign Languages: An Empirical Study of Irish Sign Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Nadolske, Marie and Rosenstock, Rachel (2007). ‘Occurrence of mouthings in American Sign Language: a preliminary study’, in Perniss, Pamela, Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus (eds.), Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Napier, Jemima (2002). ‘University interpreting: issues for consideration’, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7(4): 281–301.Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo and Sutton-Spence, Rachel (2014). ‘Order of the major constituents in sign languages: implications for all language’, Frontiers in Psychology 5: 376–405.Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin and Lee, Robert G. (2000). The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar

Nicodemus, Brenda, Swabey, Laurie, Leeson, Lorraine, Napier, Jemima, Petitta, Giulia and Taylor, Marty M. (2017). ‘A cross-linguistic analysis of fingerspelling production by sign language interpreters’, Sign Language Studies 17(2): 143–71.Google Scholar

Penn, Claire and Reagan, Timothy (1994). ‘The properties of South African Sign Language: lexical diversity and syntactic unity’, Sign Language Studies 85: 319–27.Google Scholar

Penn, Claire, Ogilvy-Foreman, Dale, Doldin, Debbie and Anderson-Forbes, Meribeth (1994). Dictionary of Southern African Signs for Communication with the Deaf. Pretoria: HSRC.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus (2015). ‘PERSON climbing up a tree (and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization)’, in Rutkowski, Paweł (ed.), Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–101.Google Scholar

Prinsloo, Aletta (2003). ‘An introductory South African Sign Language grammar for the beginner sign language student’, unpublished MA dissertation, University of the Free State.Google Scholar

Puglielli, Annarita and Frascarelli, Mara (2007). ‘Interfaces: the relation between structure and output’, in Pizzuto, Elena, Pietrandrea, Paula and Simone, Raffaele (eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs, and Methodologies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 133–67.Google Scholar

Reagan, Timothy (2008). ‘South African Sign Language and language in education policy in South Africa’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 165–90.Google Scholar

Reilly, Judy, McIntire, Marina and Bellugi, Ursula (1990). ‘The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language’, Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 369–92.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy (2009). ‘Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language’, Semiotica 174(1): 241–75.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy (2010). ‘Prosody and syntax in sign languages’, Transactions of the Philological Society 108(3): 298–328.Google Scholar

Schermer, Trude (1985). ‘Analysis of natural discourse of deaf adults in the Netherlands: observations on Dutch Sign Language’, in Stokoe, William and Volterra, Virginia (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Sign Language Research Symposium, Rome, June 22–26, 1983. Silver Spring: Linstock Press, pp. 281–8.Google Scholar

Steyn, Minna (2015). ‘Investigating the course of L1 SASL development and L2 Afrikaans reading development in young deaf children following a newly introduced curriculum with SASL as both LoLT and school subject’, unpublished MA thesis, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar

Stokoe, William (1960/2005). ‘Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf’, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1): 3–37.Google Scholar

Sutton-Spence, Rachel and Woll, Bencie (2006). The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sze, Felix (2011). ‘Nonmanual markings for topic constructions in Hong Kong Sign Language’, Sign Language and Linguistics 14(1): 115–47.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah (2010). ‘Contact explanations in linguistics’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar

Toury, Gideon (2012). Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond: Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Van der Kooij, Els, Crasborn, Onno and Emmerik, Wim (2006). ‘Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: pragmatics required’, Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1598–614.Google Scholar

Van Herreweghe, Mieke and Vermeerbergen, Myriam (2012). ‘Verbal predicates in Flemish sign language (VGT) and South African sign language (SASL)’, in Van Peteghem, Marleen, Lauwers, Peter, Tobback, Els, Demol, Annemie, and de Wilde, Laurence (eds.), Le Verbe en verve: Réflexions sur la syntaxe et la sémantique verbales. Ghent: Academia Press, pp. 401–20.Google Scholar

Vermeerbergen, Myriam, van Herreweghe, Mieke, Akach, Philemon and Matabane, Emily (2007). ‘Constituent order in Flemish Sign Language (VGT) and South African Sign Language (SASL)’, Sign Language and Linguistics 10(1): 23–54.Google Scholar

Vinson, David, Thompson, Robin, Skinner, Robert, Fox, Neil and Vigliocco, Gabriella. (2010). ‘The hands and mouth do not always slip together in British Sign Language: dissociating articulatory channels in the lexicon’, Psychological Science 21(8): 1158–67.Google Scholar

Wehrmeyer, Ella 2015. ‘Comprehension of television news sign language interpreters – a South African perspective’, Interpreting 17(2): 195–225.Google Scholar

Wehrmeyer, Ella 2016. ‘An annotation system for signed language interpreting corpora’, Hermeneus 17: 279–318.Google Scholar

Wehrmeyer, Ella (2019). ‘A corpus for signed language interpreting research’, Interpreting 21(1): 62–90.Google Scholar

Wilbur, Ronnie (2015). ‘The point of agreement: changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement’, in Rutkowski, Paveł (ed.), Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103–39.Google Scholar

Wilbur, Ronnie (2012). ‘Information structure’, in Pfau, Roland, Steinbach, Markus and Woll, Bencie (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook. HSK Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 462–89.Google Scholar