Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T14:26:58.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Impact of language variation and accommodation theory on language maintenance: an analysis of Shaba Swahili

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

André Kapanga
Affiliation:
Illinois State University
Lenore A. Grenoble
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Lindsay J. Whaley
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In recent years, the dialect of Swahili spoken in Shaba, Zaire, has been one of the few African languages that have raised a certain level of curiosity in the field of pidgin and Creole studies, in large part because Shaba Swahili (Sh.S.) exhibits many differences when compared to other Swahili subdialects spoken in East Africa (and eastern Zaire). These variations have generally been considered as instances of decay, colloquialism, corruption, and even a threat to the “homogeneous nature” of the Swahilip-speaking community.

However, one of the areas for which Sh.S. has not been studied is its usefulness for our understanding of the process of linguistic maintenance or language revitalization. In other words, since Sh.S. has generally been considered as a less prestigious variant, there has been a concerted effort to bolster the more prestigious subdialect, Standard Sh.S. These efforts, which have generally been witnessed in churches, schools, some courts, and in the local and national media, have proven to be unsuccessful. The “ordinary” or less prestigious dialect is still very strong and is thriving in all spheres of the Shabian society.

In this chapter, I will not discuss the policies put in place to bolster the Standard Subdialect. I will rather concentrate on the study of some of the natural, linguistic, political, attitudinal, psychological, and social factors that have contributed to the entrenchment of a subdialect which is naturally more prominent than the more prestigious subdialect, namely Standard Sh.S.

Type
Chapter
Information
Endangered Languages
Language Loss and Community Response
, pp. 261 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×