Book contents
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 The retransformation of Europe
- 2 The costs of non-disintegration: the case of the European Monetary Union
- 3 Sharing the Eurocrats' dream: a demoicratic approach to EMU governance in the post-crisis era
- 4 Neumark vindicated: the three patterns of Europeanisation of national tax systems and the future of the social and democraticRechtsstaat
- 5 What Europe does to citizenship
- 6 Silencing the Eurocrats in public crisis politics
- 7 Conflict-minimising integration: how the EU achieves massive integration despite massive protest
- 8 An unholy trinity of EU Presidents?: Political accountability of EU executive power
- 9 The limits of collective action and collective leadership
- 10 Europe’s legitimacy problem and the courts
- 11 Crisis reconfiguration of the European constitutional state
- 12 Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe's emergency
- Index
- References
10 - Europe’s legitimacy problem and the courts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
By
Book contents
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 The retransformation of Europe
- 2 The costs of non-disintegration: the case of the European Monetary Union
- 3 Sharing the Eurocrats' dream: a demoicratic approach to EMU governance in the post-crisis era
- 4 Neumark vindicated: the three patterns of Europeanisation of national tax systems and the future of the social and democraticRechtsstaat
- 5 What Europe does to citizenship
- 6 Silencing the Eurocrats in public crisis politics
- 7 Conflict-minimising integration: how the EU achieves massive integration despite massive protest
- 8 An unholy trinity of EU Presidents?: Political accountability of EU executive power
- 9 The limits of collective action and collective leadership
- 10 Europe’s legitimacy problem and the courts
- 11 Crisis reconfiguration of the European constitutional state
- 12 Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe's emergency
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The End of the Eurocrats' DreamAdjusting to European Diversity, pp. 241 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Alter, K. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annweiler, J. (1997) Die Auslegungsmethoden des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Beck, G. (2013) The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Buck, C. (1998) Über die Auslegungsmethoden des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Choudhry, S. (ed.) (2006) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2009) ‘Defending Sovereign Statehood against Transforming the European Union into a State’, European Constitutional Law Review, 5(3), 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2012) Die Zukunft der Verfassung II: Auswirkungen von Europäisierung und Globalisierung, Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2013) ‘Der Datenschutz vor einer Neuorientierung’, Juristenzeitung, 68(12), 585–92.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2015) ‘The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case’, European Law Journal, 21(4), 460–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, S. (1997) Die Auslegung des Gemeinschaftsrechts durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof: Zugleich eine rechtsvergleichende Studie zur Auslegung im Völkerrecht und im Gemeinschaftsrecht, Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. (2008) ‘Stop the European Court of Justice’ Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8 September.Google Scholar
Höpner, M., and Schäfer, A. (eds) (2008) Die politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., and Rödl, F. (2009) ‘Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the “Social Deficit” of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgments of the Court in Viking and Laval’, European Law Journal, 15(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokott, J. (2011) ‘Der EuGH – eine neo-liberale Institution?’, in Grundrechte und Solidarität: Durchsetzung und Verfahren. Festschrift für Renate Jaeger, Kehl: Engel, 115–34.Google Scholar
Komárek, J. (2014) ‘National Constitutional Courts in the European Constitutional Democracy’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), 525–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühling, J. (2009) ‘Fundamental Rights’, in Von Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J., Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Hart, 479–514.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2005) Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, A. (2011) Gemeinschaftsrecht und deutsches Recht, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payandeh, M. (2011) ‘Constitutional Review of EU law after Honeywell’, Common Market Law Review, 48(1), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prechal, S. (2005) Directives in EC Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2009) ‘Legitimacy in the Multi-level European Polity’, European Political Science Review, 1(2), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2010) Community and Autonomy, Institutions, Policies and Legitimacy in Multilevel Europe, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2015) ‘After the Crash: A Perspective on Multilevel European Democracy’, European Law Journal, 21(3), 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F., and Schmidt, V. (eds) (2000) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V., and Thatcher, M. (eds) (2013) Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (2004) The Judicial Construction of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streinz, R. (2010) ‘Die Rolle des EuGH im Prozess der Europäischen Integration’, Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 135, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G. (2005) The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Venzke, I. (2013) ‘Understanding the Authority of International Courts and Tribunals’, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, 2013–29.Google Scholar
Volkmann, U. (2013) Grundzüge einer Verfassungslehre der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Wahl, R. (2013) ‘Das Recht der Integrationsgemeinschaft Europäische Union’, in Franzius, C. (ed.), Beharren – Bewegen, Festschrift für Michael Kloepfer, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. (1991) ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. (1994) ‘A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors’, Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. (2012) ‘Europe in Crisis – On Political “Messianism”, “Legitimacy” and the “Rule of Law”’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 248–69.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by