
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Emerging Civic Urbanisms in Asia: An Introduction
- 2 Walking Tours and Community Heritage in Singapore: Civic Activism in the Making in Queenstown and Geylang
- 3 Resistance and Resilience: A Case Study of Rebuilding the Choi Yuen Village in Hong Kong
- 4 Urban Planning, Public Interest, and Spatial Justice: A Case Study of the Lo-Sheng Sanatorium Preservation Movement in Taipei
- 5 Placemaking as Social Learning: Taipei’s Open Green Programme as Pedagogical Civic Urbanism
- 6 Hong Kong’s Urban Renewal Fund: A Step towards Citizen-driven Placemaking?
- 7 Re-emerging Civic Urbanism: The Evolving State–Civil Society Relations in Community Building in Seoul
- 8 A Shifting Paradigm of Urban Regeneration in Seoul?: A Case Study of Citizen Participation in Haebangchon Urban Regeneration Project
- 9 Building Communities through Neighbourhood-based: Participatory Planning in Singapore
- 10 Beyond the Sunday Spectacle: Foreign Domestic Workers and Emergent Civic Urbanisms in Hong Kong
- 11 Holding Space, Making Place: Nurturing Emergent Solidarities within New Food Systems in Singapore
- 12 Conclusion: Civic Urbanisms and Urban Governance in Asia and Beyond
- Index
- Publications/Global Asia
4 - Urban Planning, Public Interest, and SpatialJustice: A Case Study of the Lo-Sheng SanatoriumPreservation Movement in Taipei
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2022
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Emerging Civic Urbanisms in Asia: An Introduction
- 2 Walking Tours and Community Heritage in Singapore: Civic Activism in the Making in Queenstown and Geylang
- 3 Resistance and Resilience: A Case Study of Rebuilding the Choi Yuen Village in Hong Kong
- 4 Urban Planning, Public Interest, and Spatial Justice: A Case Study of the Lo-Sheng Sanatorium Preservation Movement in Taipei
- 5 Placemaking as Social Learning: Taipei’s Open Green Programme as Pedagogical Civic Urbanism
- 6 Hong Kong’s Urban Renewal Fund: A Step towards Citizen-driven Placemaking?
- 7 Re-emerging Civic Urbanism: The Evolving State–Civil Society Relations in Community Building in Seoul
- 8 A Shifting Paradigm of Urban Regeneration in Seoul?: A Case Study of Citizen Participation in Haebangchon Urban Regeneration Project
- 9 Building Communities through Neighbourhood-based: Participatory Planning in Singapore
- 10 Beyond the Sunday Spectacle: Foreign Domestic Workers and Emergent Civic Urbanisms in Hong Kong
- 11 Holding Space, Making Place: Nurturing Emergent Solidarities within New Food Systems in Singapore
- 12 Conclusion: Civic Urbanisms and Urban Governance in Asia and Beyond
- Index
- Publications/Global Asia
Summary
Abstract
Using the Lo-Sheng Sanatorium PreservationMovement as a case study, this chapter examinesseveral substantial problems in urban planningtheories, including the multiplicity of publicinterests, the necessity of framing publicinterest from the perspective of spatial justice,and the changing relationship between the stateand civil society in the planning process. Byexploring various urban discourses proposed by aplurality of groups concerning the Lo-Shengheritage site, I argue that the Lo-ShengPreservation Movement demonstrates how heritageactivism can reshape public interest and changethe state's relationship with civil society. Assuch, the movement was an invaluable milestone inthe emergence of civic urbanism in Taipei.
Keywords: Heritage preservation,public sphere, urban social movement, planningtheory, Hansen's disease
‘Can You Afford It?’
This chapter is inspired by the Lo-ShengSanatorium(樂生療養院) (hereafter referred to asLo-Sheng) Preservation Movement in Taipei. Lo-Shengwas a facility established in the 1930s to housepatients suffering from Hansen's disease (what usedto be called leprosy), and it is located in what isnow the Xinzhuang District of New Taipei City,Taiwan. The sanatorium was constructed by theJapanese colonial government to isolate leprosypatients from the general public. In 2002, a seriesof preservation actions took place when plans wereannounced to locate the depot of the Taipei MassRapid Transport (MRT) Xinzhuang Line at the site ofthe sanatorium. In April 2002, two months before theconstruction began, the Lo-Sheng Alliance for OldTree Protection in Xinzhuang was established bygroups including the Xinzhuang Community College,Xinzhuang Culture and History Association, andLo-Sheng residents. This alliance successfullyadvocated for saving many old trees on the site andraised awareness of Lo-Sheng's cultural value forXinzhuang residents, the media, and other civilsociety groups. Then, in 2004, Youth for Lo-Sheng(青年樂生聯盟)was established by students mainly from theNational Yang- Ming University, Chang GungUniversity, and Kaohsiung Medical University, topreserve all the buildings and outdoor spaces onsite. However, public authorities – including theTaipei City Government's Department of Rapid TransitSystems (DRTS), which led the construction, and theDepartment of Cultural Affairs of Taipei County (nowNew Taipei City), which oversaw cultural affairs –denied the groups’ petition, claiming that thepreservation efforts would delay the construction ofinfrastructure critical for the country.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emerging Civic Urbanisms in AsiaHong Kong, Seoul, Singapore, and Taipei beyondDevelopmental Urbanization, pp. 95 - 118Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2022