Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T21:02:00.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Grounding Social Cognition

Synchronization, Coordination, and Co-Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gün R. Semin  and
Eliot R. Smith
By
Gün R. Semin  and
John T. Cacioppo
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam
Eliot R. Smith
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
John T. Cacioppo
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, IL, USA
Get access

Summary

The tabula of human nature was never rasa.

W. D. Hamilton

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the social in social cognition has presented a number of challenges that have been with us from the very beginnings of “modern” psychology (cf. Semin, 1986). The first challenge is to come to terms with what the “social” means. As Gallese noted recently: “The hard problem in ‘social cognition’ is to understand how the epistemic gulf separating single individuals can be overcome” (Gallese, 2006, p. 16). The foundations of Völkerpsychologie in the 1850s (Lazarus, 1861; Lazarus & Steinhal, 1860; Wedewer, 1860; Waitz, 1859) constituted an attempt to overcome the then prevailing individual-centered psychology in German psychology by introducing a social level of analysis. The emerging modern social psychology in the early 20th century grappled with this problem, fluctuating between notions of “group mind” and “instinct,” with Durkheim, LeBon, Ross, Tarde, and Wundt arguing in different voices for collective representations, group mind, collective mind, collective consciousness, or Völkerpsychologie. Of these various influences, the prevailing view that emerged was driven by Allport's vision of a social psychology that was individual-centered and regarded as a subdiscipline of psychology (Allport, 1924; cf. Post, 1980; Graumann, 1984, inter alia). This has very much remained the dominant view of mainstream social cognition and is underlined with reference to the biological finitude of the individual.

Type
Chapter
Information
Embodied Grounding
Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches
 , pp. 119 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adolphs, R., & Spezio, M. (2007). The neural basis of affective and social behavior. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3ed ed.) (pp. 540–554). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolphs, R. (2006). How do we know the minds of others? Domain specificity, simulation, and enactive social cognition. Brain Research, 1079, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agre, P. E. (1997). Computation and human experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Amodio, D. M., & Firth, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 268–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, T. J., & Coppola, D. M. (1999). Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research, 39, 2947–2953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, J. T., & Purves, D. (2005). The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 261–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldissera, F., Cavallari, P., Craighero, L., & Fadiga, L. (2001). Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 190–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L., & Henzi, P. (2005). The social nature of primate cognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 272, 1865–1875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google ScholarPubMed
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, L. (1988). Form and function in motor mimicry: Topographic evidence that the primary function is communicative. Human Communication Research, 14, 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, L. (1986). I show how you feel: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A53, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernieri, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination, behavior matching, and interpersonal synchrony. In Feldman, R. & Rime, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–433). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernieri, F. J. (1988). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, L. J. (1986). Syntactic priming in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, L. J. (1989). Close class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, L. J., & Loeblell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Brazelton, T. B., Koslowski, B., & Main, M. (1974). Origins of reciprocity: The early mother-infant interaction. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblaum, L. (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 49–76). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400–404.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, C. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullowa, M. (1975). When infant and adult communicate, how do they synchronize their behavior? In Kendon, A., Harris, R. M., & Keys, M. R. (Eds.), Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction (pp. 95–127). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2005). People thinking about people: The vicious cycle of being a social outcast in one's own mind. In Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., and Hippel, W. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 91–108). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, J., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations. III. Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.-C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 5497–5502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. L., & Jefferis, V. E. (2003). Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 290–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1959). A Review of B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language 35(1), 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1993). Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation. Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1997 ). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., & Teasley, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 143, 338–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Oehman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabbs, J. M. (1969). Similarity of gestures and interpersonal influence [Summary]. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 337–338.
Davis, M. (1982). Interaction Rhythms: Periodicity in Communicative Behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Gelder, B., Snyder, J., Greve, D., Gerard, G., & Hadijkhani, N. (2004). Fear fosters flight: A mechanism for fear contagion when perceiving emotion expressed by a whole body. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 47, 16701–16706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, L. (2005). Perspective taking as the royal avenue to empathy. In: Malle, B. F. & Hodges, S. D. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other (pp. 135–149). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). Multiple perspectives on the psychological and neural bases of understanding other people's behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, di G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1–40.Google Scholar
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, P. F., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., & Fogassi, L. (2003). Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1703–1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, P. F., Maiolini, C., Addessi, E., Fogassi, L., & Visalberghi, E. (2005). The observation and hearing of eating actions activates motor programs related to eating in macaque monkeys. Behavior & Brain Research, 161, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth, C. D., & Firth, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Furuyama, N., Hayashi, K., & Mishima, H. (2005). Interpersonal coordination among articulations, gesticulations, and breathing movements: A case of articulation of /a/ and flexion of the wrist. In Heft, H. & Marsh, K. L. (Eds.), Studies in perception and action (pp. 45–48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 509–525.Google Scholar
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989b). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. (2001). The “shared manifold” hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7), 33–50.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B Biological Sciences, 358, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomena of Cognitive Science, 4, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research, 1079, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, A. I. (2002). Simulation theory and mental concepts. In Dokic, J. & Proust, J. (Eds), Simulation and knowledge of action (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2005). Imitation, mind reading, and simulation. In Hurley, S. & Chater, N. (Eds.), Perspective on imitation, from neuroscience to social science, Vol. 2 (pp. 79–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103–111.Google Scholar
Graumann, C. (1984). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd H. Allport's contribution to the history of social psychology. Archiv für die Geschichte der Psychologie, Historische Reihe, No. 10. Heidelberg: Institute of Psychology.Google Scholar
Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotion contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, W. D., Davis, K. D., Lozano, A. M., Tasker, R. R., & Dostrovsky, J. O. (1999). Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature-Neuroscience, 2, 403–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 632–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabbi, M., Swart, M., Keysers, C. (2007). Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. Neuroimage, 34, 1744–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage, 24, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture. To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 1–29A.Google ScholarPubMed
Julien, D., Brault, M., Chartrand, E., & Begin, J. (2000). Immediacy behaviours and synchrony in satisfied and dissatisfied couples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 100–125.Google ScholarPubMed
Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse-Processes, 24, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research, xxxx.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keysers, C., Kohler, E., Umiltà, M. A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2003). Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 628–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 655–701). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Chiu, C. (1998). Language and social behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2) (pp. 41–88). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In Davis, M. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp.). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group and Organization Studies, 1, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, M. (1861). Über das Verhältnis des Einzelnen zur Gesamtheit. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 2, 393–453.Google Scholar
Lazarus, M., & Steinhal, H. (1860). Einleitende Gedanken über Völkerpsychologie als Einladung zu für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 1, 1–73.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipps, T. (1903). Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung, und Organempfindungen. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologiue, 2, 185–204.Google Scholar
Manthey, S., Schubotz, R. L., & Cramon, D. Y. (2003). Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 296–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18, 1–38Google Scholar
McDougal, W. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabasi, A. L. (2000). The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature, 403, 849–850.Google Scholar
Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Toole, O' R., & Dubin, R. (1968). Baby feeding and body sway: An experiment in George Herbert Mead's taking the role of the other. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 10, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, D. L. (1980). Floyd H. Allport and the launching of modern social psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 369–376.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, H. M. (1981). Whither interactional synchrony? In Bloom, K. (Ed.), Prospective issues in infancy research (pp. 71–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sachs, H. A.., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1982). Comments on the significance of interaction rhythms. In Davis, M. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 13–22). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, W. N. (1976). Do children find movements which cross the body midline difficult?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semin, G. R. (1986). The individual, the social and the social individual. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In Kruglanski, A. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd edition) (pp. 630–649). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). From representation to co-regulation. In Pineda, J. A. (Ed.), Mirror neuron systems: The role of mirroring processes in social cognition. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (in prep). Social cognition: A model. (In prep).
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326–332.Google ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 201–208.Google ScholarPubMed
Singer, T., Seymour, B., Doherty, O' J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. F. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not the sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J. A., & Decety, J. (2006). Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N. (1974). Mother and infant at play. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblaum, L. (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 187–213). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M., & Decety, J. (2000). New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. NeuroReport, 11, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Street, R. L. Jr. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, S. (2003). SYNC: Rhythms of nature, rhythms of ourselves. London: Allen Lane: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Swanson, R., & Benton, A. L. (1955). Some aspects of the genetic development of right-left discrimination. Child Development, 26, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 113–136.Google Scholar
Umiltà, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). “I know what you are doing”: A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 32, 91–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., Bouter, C., & Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 84, 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Is perception discrete or continuous?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vera, A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waitz, T. (1859). In Gerland, G. Psychologische Anthropologie. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 1, 387–412.Google Scholar
Wapner, S., & Cirillo, L. (1968). Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Development, 39, 887–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedewer, H. (1860). Über the Wichtigkeit und Bedeutung der Sprache. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 1, 180.Google Scholar
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.-P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 701–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlschläger, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 358, 501–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, W., & Barsalou, L. W. (2000). The situated nature of concepts (unpublished), Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×