Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T09:29:52.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Embodied Persuasion

Fundamental Processes By Which Bodily Responses Can Impact Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gün R. Semin  and
Eliot R. Smith
By
Pablo Briñol  and
Richard E. Petty
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam
Eliot R. Smith
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Pablo Briñol
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Richard E. Petty
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, OH, USA
Get access

Summary

This chapter concerns embodiment and people's attitudes. Attitudes commonly refer to the general evaluations people hold regarding various objects, issues, and people (e.g., Petty & Cacioppo, 1981). The link between the attitude concept and bodily responses has a long history, going back to the use of the term attitude to refer to the posture of one's body (Galton, 1884) and to expressive motor behaviors (e.g., a scowling face was said to indicate a hostile attitude; Darwin, 1965). Today, we still ask for people's position on an issue though the meaning refers to an evaluative rather than a physical orientation.

In this chapter, we review research focused on the impact of a person's own bodily responses on attitudes such as when vertical head movements lead to more favorable attitudes than horizontal (Wells & Petty, 1980). As we describe in this review, a large number of bodily movements have been studied and many effects found. We use the term embodiment to refer to the idea that the body contributes to the acquisition, change, and use of attitudes.

We review contemporary social psychological literature with a focus on how the body can influence attitudes. In particular, we will: outline a general framework that articulates the key psychological processes by which one's body can affect attitudes; describe how different bodily postures and movements have been postulated to influence persuasion by each of these fundamental mechanisms; highlight a recently discovered new mechanism called self-validation and describe how this mechanism can contribute to understanding bodily influences on evaluation; and outline some remaining issues and directions for future research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Embodied Grounding
Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches
 , pp. 184 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication (2nd ed.) New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 575–616). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Embodied persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Barden, J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as determinant of thought-confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711–727.CrossRef
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2006). The meaning of ease and its malleability. Psychological Science, 17, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053.CrossRef
Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). The effects of exogenous changes in heart rate on the facilitation of thought and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 483–496.Google ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Marshall-Goodell, B. S., Tassinary, L. G., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaiken, S., & Baldwin, M. W. (1981). Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1–12.Google Scholar
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). An automatic effect of (all) attitudes on behavior: Preconsious approach and avoidance responses to liked and disliked stimuli. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2004). The influence of unilateral and bilateral arm flexion versus extension on judgments: An exploratory case of motor congruence. Emotion, 4, 282–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1965). The expression of emotions in man and animals.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872).Google Scholar
DeMarree, K. G., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (under review). Implicit self-validation: The effects of overt behavior on primed social constructs.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic. Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Förster, J. (2004). How body feedback influences consumers' evaluation of products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 416–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, J., & Stepper, S. (2000). Compatibility between approach/avoidance simulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 853–871.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1996). Influence of overt head movements on memory for valence words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 42, 179–185.Google Scholar
Ito, T. A., Chiao, K. W., Devine, P. G., Lorig, T. S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). The influence of facial feedback on race bias. Psychological Science, 17, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role-playing on opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laird, J. D., & Bresler, C. (1992). The process of emotional experience: A self-perception theory. In Clark, M. S. (Ed.). Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 13 (pp. 213–234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D., (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., & Hafer, C. L. (1990). Self- inference processes: Looking back and ahead. In Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). Self-inference processes: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 6 (pp. 293–320). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W., (Eds.) Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. (pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). The role of bodily responses in attitude measurement and change. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 51–101). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Briñol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Byant, J. & Zillmann, D. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd ed. (pp. 155–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 1 (pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., Heesacker, M., Brock, T. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). The effects of recipient posture on persuasion: A cognitive response analysisPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis (pp. 133–162). In Maio, G. & Olson, J. (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Priester, J. M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riskind, J. H., & Gotay, C. C. (1982). Physical posture: Could it have regulatory or feedback effects on motivation and emotion?Motivation and Emotion, 6, 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (under review). The role of meta-cognition in relying on one's emotions.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, T. W. (2004). The power in your hand: Gender differences in bodily feedback from making a fist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 757–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., Tesser, A., & Powell, E. (1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Psychology Quarterly, 45, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective status influence the processing of persuasive communications. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 24 (pp. 161–197). San Diego, CA: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Propioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., & Neumann, R. (2000). Furrowing the brow may undermine perceived fame: The role of facial feedback in judgments of celebrity. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 762–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., Martin, L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamir, M., Robinson, M. D., Clore, G. L., Martin, L. L., & Whitaker, D. J. (2004). Are we puppets on a string? The contextual meaning of unconscious expressive cues. Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E. (1975). On inferring one's attitude from one's behavior: Some delimiting condition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 400–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol., 29 (pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B., Murphy, S. T., & Inglehart, M. (1989). Feeling and facial efference: Implications of the vascular theory of emotion. Psychological Review, 96, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×