Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T04:21:50.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - An Embodied Account of Self-Other “Overlap” and Its Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gün R. Semin  and
Eliot R. Smith
By
Eliot R. Smith
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam
Eliot R. Smith
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Eliot R. Smith
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Get access

Summary

The bonds that connect each person to important others, whether individuals (e.g., friends, romantic partners, close kin) or social groups (teams, workgroups, national or religious groups) are a core conceptual focus of the field of social psychology. Historically, research on personal relationships and research on in-group ties have proceeded as two largely independent streams. Recently, theorists and researchers have recognized the strong conceptual parallels between these issues and have moved to take advantage of them (Sedikides & Brewer, 2001; Smith, Murphy, & Coats, 1999; Smith & Henry, 1996).

In both areas, two phenomena are of central importance. One is the influence of a personal relationship or significant group membership on people's thoughts and feelings about themselves – an effect of the other person or group on the self. For example, when a social group membership becomes salient, people tend to see themselves in terms of the typical or stereotypical characteristics of the group rather than in terms of their unique personal identities, a process known as depersonalization (Turner et al., 1987). Conversely, the second phenomenon is the influence of the self on thoughts and feelings about the other person or group. For example, people tend to project their own individual characteristics (e.g., their attitudes and preferences) onto other group members, assuming that those others are similar to themselves (Robbins & Krueger, 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Embodied Grounding
Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches
 , pp. 148 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16(10), 814–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., & Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In Feldman, R. S. & Rime, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–432). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, J. D., Rytting, M., & Heslin, R. (1976). Hands touching hands: Affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry, 39, 416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (2004). Four modes of constituting relationships: Consubstantial assimilation; space, magnitude, time, and force; concrete procedures; abstract symbolism. In Haslam, N. (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 61–146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, G. G. (1970). Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science, 167, 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéguen, N. (2002). Touch, awareness of touch, and compliance with a request. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (Eds.) (2005). Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2003). Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 620–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R. (2001). The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, J. (2006). Embodied action as a ‘helping hand’ in social interaction. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 477–482). Accessed July 26, 2006 from http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/proceedings/2006/docs/p477.pdf.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and in-group favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Seger, C. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Interpersonal touch by an outgroup member reduces implicit prejudice. Unpublished, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Smith, E. R., Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 873–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., Bouter, C., & Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., Suddendorf, T., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×