Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (2007). The Two-State Vector Formalism of Quantum Mechanics: An Updated Review. arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105101v2.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (1999). Nelsonian Mechanics Revisited. Foundations of Physics Letters 12 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2008). The Statistical Interpretation According to Born and Heisenberg. In: HQ-1: Conference on the History of Quantum Physics, Vol. 2. Ed. by Joas, C., Lehner, C. and Renn, J.. Berlin: MPIWG, 269–288.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2013). Insolubility Theorems and EPR Argument. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2014). Insolubility from No-Signalling. International Journal of Theo- retical Physics 53, 3465–3474.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2015). Did Bohr Understand EPR? In: One Hundred Years of the Bohr Atom. Ed. by Aaserud, F. and Kragh, H.. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 375–394.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2016a). An Everett Perspective on Bohr and EPR. In: Niels Bohr in the 21st Century. Ed. by Faye, J. and Folse, H. J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 289–302.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2016b). Einstein, Bohm, and Leggett–Garg. In: Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology. Ed. by Dzhafarov, E., Jordan, S. and Zhang, R.. Singapore: World Scientific, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2017). Bohr's Slit and Hermann's Microscope. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 135–147.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2022). The Statistical Interpretation: Born, Heisenberg and von Neumann, 1926–27. In: Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Ed. by Freire, O. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567–585.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. and Crull, E. (2009). Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on Hidden Variables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (4), 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G., Crull, E. and Maroney, O. J. E. (2017). Jordan's Derivation of Blackbody Fluctuations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 60, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, G. and Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsid- ering the 1927 Solvay Conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, GC. (2000). A General Argument against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle. Physics Letters A 275, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J. S. (1966). On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beller, M. (1997). Against the Stream: Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (3), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belousek, D. W. (1996). Einstein's 1927 Unpublished Hidden-Variable Theory: Its Back- ground, Context and Significance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4), 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitbol, M. (1996). Schrödinger's Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bohm, D. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables. I and II. Physical Review 85 (2), 166–179, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1928a). Das Quantenpostulat und die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik. Die Naturwissenschaften 16, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1928b). The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature 121, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1931). Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung. Berlin: Springer. Translated as Bohr (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1932). Chemistry and the Quantum Theory of Atomic Constitution (Faraday Lecture). Journal of the Chemical Society 1932, 349–384.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1933a). Lys og Liv. Naturens Verden 17, 49–59. Translated as Bohr (1933b).Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1933b). Light and Life. Nature 131, 421–423, 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1935a). Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality. Nature 136, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1935b). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 48, 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Ed. by Schilpp, P. A.. Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers, 199–241.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1958). Quantum Physics and Philosophy. Causality and Complementarity. In: Philosophy in Mid-Century: A Survey – La philosophie au milieu du vingtième siècle: Chroniques. Ed. by Klibansky, R.. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 308–314.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1985). Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 6, Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926–1932). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1996). Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 7, Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933–1958). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. and Rosenfeld, L. (1933). Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der elektromagnetis- chen Feldgrössen. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Mathematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 12 (8), 3–65.Google Scholar

Born, M. (1926a). Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 37, 863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. (1926b). Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 38, 803–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. (1926c). Das Adiabatenprinzip in der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 167–192.Google Scholar

Born, M. (1929). Über den Sinn der physikalischen Theorien. Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (7), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. (1935a). The Restless Universe. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar

Born, M. (1935b). Atomic Physics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar

Born, M. (1949). Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Waynflete Lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Born, M. and Heisenberg, W. (1928). La mécanique des quanta. In: Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique Solvay. Ed. by Lorentz, H. A. and translated by Verschaffelt, J.-É.. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 143–181. Page references are to the English translation of the original German typescript in Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2009), 372–401.Google Scholar

Born, M., Heisenberg, W. and Jordan, P. (1926). Zur Quantenmechanik II. Zeitschrift für Physik 35 (8–9), 557–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1934a). Foundations of a New Field Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 144, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1934b). On the Quantization of the New Field Equations I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 147, 522–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1935). On the Quantization of the New Field Theory II. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 150, 141–166.Google Scholar

Born, M. and Schrödinger, E. (1935). The Absolute Field Constant in the New Field Theory. Nature 135, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breit, G. (1929). The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons. Physical Review 34 (4), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breit, G. (1932). Dirac's Equation and the Spin–Spin Interactions of Two Electrons. Physical Review 39 (4), 616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brillouin, M. (1933). Préface. In: E. Schrödinger, Mémoires sur la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan, v–xi.Google Scholar

Brown, H. (1978). Problems of Measurement in Quantum Theory. PhD Thesis. London: Chelsea College.Google Scholar

Brown, H. (1981). O debate Einstein-Bohr sobre a mecânica quântica. Cadernos de história e filosofia da ciência 2, 51–89.Google Scholar

Brown, H. (1986). The Insolubility Proof of the Quantum Measurement Problem. Founda- tions of Physics 16, 857–870.Google Scholar

Bub, J. (2010). Von Neumann's ‘Hidden Variables’ Proof: A Re-appraisal. Foundations of Physics 40 (9–10), 1333–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bub, J. (2011). Is von Neumann's ‘No Hidden Variables’ Proof Silly? In: Deep Beauty: Understanding the Quantum World through Mathematical Innovation. Ed. By, H. Halvorson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, P., Grabowski, M. and Lahti, P. (1997). Operational Quantum Physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Busch, P., Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P. (1991). The Quantum Theory of Measurement. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, P., Lahti, P., Pellonpää, J.-P. and Ylinen, K. (2016). Quantum Measurement. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camilleri, K. (2009). Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, N. R. (1921). Atomic Structure. Nature 107, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, N. R. (1926). Time and Chance. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosoph- ical Magazine and Journal of Science 1 (5), 1106–1117.Google Scholar

Casimir, H. B. G. (2010). Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science. 2nd edition. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, J. and Kochen, S. (2006). The Free Will Theorem. Foundations of Physics 36 (10), 1441–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. (1930). Methoden der mathematischen Physik. 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Crull, E. (2017). Hermann and the Relative Context of Observation. In: Grete Her- mann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 149–169.Google Scholar

Crull, E. (2022). Grete Hermann's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Oxford Hand- book of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Ed. by Freire, O. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567–585.Google Scholar

Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G., eds. (2017a). Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G. (2017b). Grete Hermann's Lost Manuscript on Quantum Mechanics. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 119–134.Google Scholar

de Regt, H. W. (1997). E. Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and Quantum Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4), 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derakhshani, M. (2017). Stochastic Mechanics without ad hoc Quantization: Theory and Applications to Semiclassical Gravity. PhD Thesis. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar

Dickson, M. (2002a). The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr's Reply to EPR. In: History of Philosophy of Science. Ed. by Heidelberger, M. and Stadler, F.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, M. (2002b). Bohr on Bell: A Proposed Reading of Bohr and Its Implications for Bell's Theorem. In: Non-locality and Modality. Ed. by Placek, T. and Butterfield, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, M. (2004). Quantum Reference Frames in the Context of EPR. Philosophy of Science 71 (5), 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The Quantum Theory of the Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 117, 610–624.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. 1st English edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1932). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 136, 453–464.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1934). Discussion of the Infinite Distribution of Electrons in the Theory of the Positron. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 30 (2), 150–163.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1935a). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. 2nd English edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1935b). Die Prinzipien der Quantenmechanik. 2nd German edition. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1936). Does Conservation of Energy Hold in Atomic Processes? Nature 137, 298–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M., Fock, V. A. and Podolsky, B. (1932). On Quantum Electrodynamics. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 2, 468–479.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World. The Gifford Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1921). Über ein den Elementarprozeß der Lichtemission betreffendes Exper- iment. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1921 (July– December), 882–883.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1932). Über die Unbestimmtheitsrelationen. Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie 45 (1), 23. Editorial report (anon.) of Berlin colloquium in 1931.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1936). Physik und Realität. Journal of the Franklin Institute 221, 313–347. An English translation by Picard, J. appears in the same volume, pp. 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. (1953). Elementare Überlegungen zur Interpretation der Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. In: Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born on his Retirement from the Tait Chair of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 33–40. Translated by Karanth, D. as ‘Elementary Consid- erations on the Interpretation of the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3701v1.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (2018a). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 15, The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence, June 1925–May 1927. Ed. by Kormos Buchwald, D. et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (2018b). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 15, The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence, June 1925–May 1927 (English Translation Supplement). Ed. by Kormos Buchwald, D. et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 47, 777–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. and Rosen, N. (1935). The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity. Physical Review 48, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A., Tolman, R. C. and Podolsky, B. (1931). Knowledge of Past and Future in Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review 37 (6), 780–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elby, A. and Bub, J. (1994). Triorthogonal Uniqueness Theorem and Its Relevance to the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review A 49 (5), 4213–4216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, H. (2012). The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary. Ed. by Barrett, J. A. and Byrne, P.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fermi, E. (1932). Quantum Theory of Radiation. Reviews of Modern Physics 4 (1), 87–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A. (1981). Einstein's Critique of Quantum Theory: The Roots and Significance of EPR. In: After Einstein: Proceedings of the Einstein Centennial Celebration at Memphis State University, 14–16 March 1979. Ed. by Barker, P. and Shugart, C. G.. Memphis: Memphis State University Press, 147–158. Reprinted in Fine (1986), 26–39.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1994). Schrödinger's Version of EPR, and Its Problems. In: Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher, Vol. 2. Ed. by Humphreys, P.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A. (2007). Bohr's Response to EPR: Criticism and Defense. The Jerusalem Philo- sophical Quarterly 56, 31–56.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (2017). The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/qt-epr/. First published 10 May 2014; substantive revisions 31 October 2017.Google Scholar

Flint, H. T. (1935). Quantum Mechanics as a Physical Theory. Nature 135, 1025–1026.Google Scholar

Forman, P. (1973). Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists: The Ideology and Its Manipulation in Germany after World War I. Isis 64 (2), 151–180.Google Scholar

Frappier, M. (2017). ‘In the No-Man's Land Between Physics and Logic’: On the Dialec- tical Role of the Microscope Experiment. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 85–105.Google Scholar

Furry, W. H. (1936a). Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement. Physical Review 49, 393–399.Google Scholar

Furry, W. H. (1936b). Remarks on Measurement in Quantum Theory. Physical Review 49, 476.Google Scholar

Gamow, G. (1928). Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes. Zeitschrift für Physik 51 (3–4), 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamow, G. (1966). Thirty Years that Shook Physics: The Story of Quantum Theory. New York: Doubleday & Co. Inc.Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W. von (1808). Faust. Eine Tragödie. Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar

Greenspan, N. (2005). The End of the Certain World: The Life and Science of Max Born. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Hansen-Schaberg, I. (2017). A Biographical Sketch of Prof. Dr Grete Henry-Hermann (1901–1984). In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 3–16.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1926). Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 14, 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1927a). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kine-matik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (3–4), 172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1927b). Schwankungserscheinungen und Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 40 (7), 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1930a). Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Translated as Heisenberg (1930b).Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1930b). The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Translated by Eckart, C. and Hoyt, F. C.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted New York: Dover, 1949. Page references are to the Dover edition.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1930c). Versammlung der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte. Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie 43 (38), 854. Editorial report (anon.) of various colloquia, including one by Heisenberg discussing his indeterminacy relation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1934). Wandlungen in den Grundlagen der exakten Naturwissenschaft in jüngster Zeit. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (40), 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1935a). Bemerkungen zur Theorie des Atomkerns. In: Pieter Zeeman, 1865–25 mei – 1935: Verhandelingen op 25 mei 1935 aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. P. Zeeman. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1935b). Prinzipielle Fragen der modernen Physik. In: Wandlungen in den Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaft: Acht Vorträge von W. Heisenberg. Zürich: S. Hirzel, 35–46.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1935c). Die Struktur der leichten Atomkerne. Zeitschrift für Physik 96, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1935d). Udviklingen af Kwantenteoriens principielle Grundlag efter 1925. Fysisk Tidsskrift 33, 96–101.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1969). Der Teil und das Ganze. Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. München: Piper. Translated as Heisenberg (1971).Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. (1971). Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. and Pauli, W. (1929). Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder. Zeitschrift für Physik 56 (1–2), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W. and Pauli, W. (1930). Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder II. Zeitschrift für Physik 59 (3–4), 168–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, C. (1998). Die Bohr-Einstein Debatte: Quantenmechanik und physikalische Wirk- lichkeit. Paderborn: Schöningh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermann, G. (1935a). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule 6 (2), 75–152. Reprinted as Hermann (1935c), and translated in Crull and Bacciagaluppi (2017), 239–278.Google Scholar

Hermann, G. (1935b). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (42), 718–721. Translated in Lumma (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermann, G. (1935c). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin: Verlag Öffentliches Leben.Google Scholar

Herrmann, K., ed. (2019). Grete Henry-Hermann: Philosophie – Mathematik – Quanten- mechanik. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heywood, P. and Redhead, M. (1983). Nonlocality and the Kochen–Specker Paradox. Foundations of Physics 13 (5), 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. R. (2005). What's Wrong with Einstein's 1927 Hidden-Variable Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics? Foundations of Physics 35, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, D. (1985). Einstein on Locality and Separability. Studies in History and Philoso- phy of Science 16, 171–201.Google Scholar

Howard, D. (1990). ‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein's Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems. In: Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Ed. by Miller, A. I.. New York: Plenum Press, 61–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, D. (1994). What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. In: Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Ed. by Faye, J. and Folse, H. J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, D. (2007). Revisiting the Einstein–Bohr Dialogue. The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 56, 57–90.Google Scholar

Jähnert, M. and Lehner, C. (2012). Early Debates about Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Jammer, M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Joas, C. (2011). Schrödinger's Methodology of Physics: Application and Interpretation. Talk delivered at New Directions in the Foundations of Physics, 29 April–1 May 2011 in Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Joas, C. and Lehner, C. (2009). The Classical Roots of Wave Mechanics: Schrödinger's Transformations of the Optical-Mechanical Analogy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (4), 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, P. (1927). Über quantenmechanische Darstellung von Quantensprüngen. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, P. and Pauli, W. (1928). Zur Quantenelektrodynamik ladungsfreier Felder. Zeit- schrift für Physik 47 (3–4), 151–173.Google Scholar

Kalckar, J. (1996). Part I – Introduction. In: Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 7, Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933–1958). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 3–51.Google Scholar

Kemble, E. C. (1935). The Correlation of Wave Functions with the States of Physical Systems. Physical Review 47, 973–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, M. J. (1970). The First Phase of the Bohr–Einstein Dialogue. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 2, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramers, H. A. (1933). Theorien des Aufbaues der Materie, I.: Die Grundlagen der Quan- tentheorie. Hand- und Jahrbuch der chemischen Physik, Vol. I. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Landau, L. and Peierls, R. (1931). Erweiterung des Unbestimmtheitsprinzips für die relativistische Quantentheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik 69 (1–2), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laue, M. von (1931). Die dynamische Theorie der Röntgenstrahlinterferenzen in neuer Form. Ergebnisse der Exakten Naturwissenschaften 10, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laue, M. von (1932). Zu den Erörterungen über Kausalität. Die Naturwissenschaften 20 (51), 915–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laue, M. von (1933). Materie und Raumerfüllung. Scientia 54, 402–412.Google Scholar

Laue, M. von (1934). Über Heisenbergs Ungenauigkeitsbeziehungen und ihre erkenntnis- theoretische Bedeutung. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (26), 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laue, M. von (1935a). Der optische Reziprozitätssatz in Anwendung auf die Röntgen- strahlinterferenzen. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (23), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laue, M. von (1935b). Die Fluoreszenzröntgenstrahlung von Einkristallen (mit einem Anhang über Elektronenbeugung). Annalen der Physik, Fünfte Folge 23 (8), 705–746.Google Scholar

Lehner, C. (2011). The Prehistory of Entanglement, 1926–35. Talk delivered at New Directions in the Foundations of Physics, 29 April–1 May 2011 in Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Lumma, D. (1999). The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Philosophy of Nature. The Harvard Review of Philosophy VII, 35–44. Translation of Hermann (1935b), with introduction.Google Scholar

Majorana, E. (1933). Über die Kerntheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik 82, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malament, D. B. (1996). In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot Be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles. In: Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Ed. by Clifton, R.. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–10.Google Scholar

Manzoni, A. (1840). I Promessi Sposi. 2nd revised edition. Milan: Guglielmini e Radaelli.Google Scholar

Margenau, H. (1932). Probability and Causality in Quantum Physics. The Monist 42 (2), 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margenau, H. (1936). Quantum-Mechanical Description. Physical Review 49, 240–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margenau, H. (1937). Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory. Philosophy of Science 4 (3), 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKie, D. and Heathcote, N. H. de V. (1935). The Discovery of Specific and Latent Heats. London: Edward Arnold & Co.Google Scholar

Meitner, L. (1927). Über den Aufbau des Atominnern. Die Naturwissenschaften 15 (16), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meitner, L. (1934). Atomkern und periodisches System der Elemente. Die Naturwis- senschaften 22 (44), 733–739.Google Scholar

Meyenn, K. von, ed. (2011). Eine Entdeckung von ganz ausserordentlicher Tragweite: Schrödingers Briefwechsel zur Wellenmechanik und zum Katzenparadoxon. Vols. 1–2. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mises, R. von (1931). Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in der Statistik und theoretischen Physik. Leipzig: Deuticke.Google Scholar

Møller, C. (1931). Über den Stoß zweier Teilchen unter Berücksichtigung der Retardation der Kräfte. Zeitschrift für Physik 70 (11–12), 786–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, W. (1989). Schrödinger: Life and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenstern, C. (1910). Palmström. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar

Muller, F. A. (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics: Parts I and II. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, 35–61, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, F. A. (1999a). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics (Addendum). Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (4), 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, F. A. (1999b). The Locality Scandal of Quantum Mechanics. In: Language, Quantum, Music. Ed. by Dalla Chiara, M. L., Giuntini, R. and Laudisa, F.. Dordrecht: Springer, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myrvold, W. C. (2003). On Some Early Objections to Bohm's Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, E. (1966). Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics. Physical Review 150, 1079–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, E. (1985). Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, J. von (1927). Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Aufbau der Quantenmechanik. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse 1927, 245–272.Google Scholar

Neumann, J. von (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. Translated by Beyer, R. T. as von Neumann (1955).Google Scholar

Neumann, J. von (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Norsen, T. (2015). Are There Really Two Different Bell's Theorems? arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05017.Google Scholar

Pais, A. (1982). 'Subtle is the Lord…’: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1933). Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik. In: Handbuch der Physik. Ed. by Geiger, H. and Scheel, K.. 2nd ed. Vol. XXIV(1). Berlin: Springer, 83–272.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1979). Wolfgang Pauli: Scientific Correspondence with Bohr, Einstein, Heisen- berg a.o., Vol. 1, 1919–1929. Ed. by von Meyenn, K.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1985). Wolfgang Pauli: Scientific Correspondence with Bohr, Einstein, Heisen- berg a.o., Vol. II, 1930–1939. Ed. by von Meyenn, K.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1990). Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. Reprint of the second edition of Pauli (1933) with introduction and historical notes by Straumann, N..CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peierls, R. (1934). The Vacuum in Dirac's Theory of the Positive Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 146, 420–441.Google Scholar

Planck, M. (1900a). Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 1 (1), 69–122.Google Scholar

Planck, M. (1900b). Zur Theorie des Gesetztes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, Zweite Folge 2 (17), 237–245.Google Scholar

Planck, M. (1906). Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1934). Zur Kritik der Ungenauigkeitsrelationen. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (48), 807–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. (1935). Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar

Przibram, K., ed. (1967). Letters on Wave Mechanics. New York: Philosophical Library. Originally published as Briefe zur Wellenmechanik. Wien: Springer, 1963.Google Scholar

Rosen, N. (1931). The Normal State of the Hydrogen Molecule. Physical Review 38, 2099–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, N. (1985). Quantum Mechanics and Reality. In: 50 Years of the Einstein–Podolsky– Rosen Gedankenexperiment. Ed. by Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P.. Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Joensuu, Finland, 16–20 June 1985. Singapore: World Scientific, 17–33.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, L. (1967). Niels Bohr in the Thirties. In: Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues. Ed. by Rozenthal, S.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 114–137.Google Scholar

Ruark, A. E. (1935). Is the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Com- plete? Physical Review 48, 466–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheibe, E. (1973). The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Translated by Sykes, J. B..Google Scholar

Schilpp, P. A., ed. (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1917). Die Ergebnisse der neueren Forschung über Atom- und Moleku- larwärmen. Die Naturwissenschaften 5, 537–543, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1926a). Zur Einsteinschen Gastheorie. Physikalische Zeitschrift 27, 95–101.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1926b). Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quanten- mechanik zu der meinen. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 79, 734–756.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1926c). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (dritte Mitteilung: Störungs- theorie, mit Anwendung auf den Starkeffekt der Balmerlinien). Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 80, 437–490.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1926d). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (vierte Mitteilung). Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 81, 109–139.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1927). Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 83 (15), 956–968.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1928a). La mécanique des ondes. In: Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique Solvay. Ed. by Lorentz, H. A. and translated by Verschaffelt, J.-É.. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 185–213. English translation of the original German typescript and of the published discussion in Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2009), 406–431.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1928b). Abhandlungen zur Wellenmechanik. 2nd enlarged edition. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. Translated by Shearer, J. F. and Deans, W. M. as Schrödinger (1928c).Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1928c). Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1928d). Four Lectures on Wave Mechanics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1928e). Der erkenntnistheoretische Wert physikalischer Modellvorstellungen. In: Jahresbericht des Physikalischen Vereins zu Frankfurt am Main 1928/29. Frankfurt: Physikalischer Verein, 44–51. Translated by Johnston, W. H. as ‘Conceptual Models in Physics and their Philosophical Value’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 119–132. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929a). Was ist ein Naturgesetz? Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (1), 9–11. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘What is a Law of Nature?’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 107–118. Page references are to this translation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929b). Neue Wege in der Physik. Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift 50, 15–16.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929c). Die Erfassung der Quantengesetze durch kontinuierliche Funktio- nen. Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (26), 486–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929d). Das Gesetz der Zufälle. Die Koralle 5, 417–418. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘The Law of Chance’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 33–42. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929e). Das Rätsel des Lichtes. Die Koralle 5, 294–298.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1929f). Antrittsrede des Hrn. SCHRÖDINGER. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse, C–CII.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1930). Was ist eigentlich Elektrizität? Die Koralle 6, 110–112.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1931a). Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse 8–9, 144–153.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1931b). Spezielle Relativitätstheorie und Quantenmechanik. Sitzungs- berichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse 12, 238–247.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1932a). Sur la theórie relativiste de l’électron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 2, 269–310.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1932b). Anmerkungen zum Kausalproblem. Erkenntnis 3, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1932c). Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. In: Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, 1–24. Translated by Johnston, W. H. as ‘Indeterminism in Physics’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 43–65. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1932d). Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? In: Über Indeterminis- mus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, 25–62. Freely translated by Murphy, J. as Schrödinger (1935b) and Schrödinger (1935c).Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1932e). Über Indeterminismus in der Physik – Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1933). Mémoires sur la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan. Translation by A. Proca of Schrödinger (1928b), with a Preface by M. Brillouin (see Brillouin 1933), and a new introduction and notes by the author.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1934). Über die Unanwendbarkeit der Geometrie im Kleinen. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (31), 518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935a). Der Grundgedanke der Wellenmechanik. In: Les Prix Nobel en 1933. Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner, 1–13. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘The Fundamen- tal Idea of Wave Mechanics’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 133–154. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935b). Is Science a Fashion of the Times? In: Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin, 66–85. Free translation by Murphy, J. of sections I–II of Schrödinger (1932d).Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935c). Physical Science and the Temper of the Age. In: Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin, 86–106. Free translation by Murphy, J. of section III of Schrödinger (1932d).Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935d). Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935e). Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Sys- tems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 31 (4), 555–563.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935f). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, I–III. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (48–50), 807–812, 823–828, 844–849. Translated in Trimmer (1980). Page references are to this translation and to its reprint in this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935g). Contributions to Born's New Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 150, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935h). La nueva mecánica ondulatoria. Cursos de la universidad internacional de verano en Santander, vol. 1. Madrid: Signo, 1–73.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1935i). ¿Son lineales las verdaderas ecuaciones del campo electromag- nético? Anales de la sociedad española de física y química 33, 511–517.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1936). Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 32, 446–452.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1957). Science, Theory and Man. New York: Dover. Augmented edition of Schrödinger (1935d).Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1962). Die Wandlung des physikalischen Weltbegriffs. In: Was ist ein Naturgesetz? Beiträge zum naturwissenschaftlichen Weltbild. München and Wien: Oldenbourg, 18–26.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1984). Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Wien/Braunschweig: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften/Vieweg.Google Scholar

Seevinck, M. (2017). Challenging the Gospel: Grete Hermann on von Neumann's No- Hidden-Variables Proof. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. By, E. Crull and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 107–117.Google Scholar

Slater, J. C. (1929). Physical Meaning of Wave Mechanics. Journal of the Franklin Institute 207 (4), 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soler, L. (2017). The Convergence of Transcendental Philosophy and Quantum Physics: Grete Henry-Hermann's 1935 Pioneering Proposal. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 55–69.Google Scholar

Stairs, A. (1978). Quantum Mechanics, Logic and Reality. PhD Thesis. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar

Stöltzner, M. (1999). Vienna Indeterminism: Mach, Boltzmann, Exner. Synthese 119 (1–2), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tauschinsky, A. and van Dongen, J. (2008). Over lichtemissie: Albert Einstein en de vroege geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Natuurkundige Vereniging. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 74, 90–93.Google Scholar

Temple, G. (1935). The Fundamental Paradox of the Quantum Theory. Nature, 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trimmer, J. D. (1980). The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124 (5), 323–338.Google Scholar

Uffink, J. (2007). Compendium to the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics. In: Handbook of the Philosophy of Physics. Ed. by Butterfield, J. and Earman, J.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 924–1074.Google Scholar

Uffink, J. (2017). The Prehistory of Entanglement: Schrödinger and the Development of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Experiment. Talk delivered at the 25th International Congress of History of Science and Technology, 23–29 July 2017 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar

Uffink, J. (2018). Schrödinger and the EPR Argument. Talk delivered at the Foundations of Physics Seminar, Utrecht University, 30 November 2018.Google Scholar

Uffink, J. (2020). Schrödinger's Reaction to the EPR Paper. In: Quantum, Probability, Logic: Itamar Pitowsky's Work and Influence. Ed. by Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O.. Berlin: Springer, 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dongen, J. (2007a). Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein, and the Canal Ray Experiments on Wave–Particle Duality: Scientific Fraud and Theoretical Bias. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37 (supp.), 73–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dongen, J. (2007b). The Interpretation of the Einstein–Rupp Experiments and Their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37 (supp.), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dongen, J. (2015). Communicating the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relations: Niels Bohr, Complementarity and the Einstein–Rupp Experiments. In: One Hundred Years of the Bohr Atom. Ed. by Aaserud, F. and Kragh, H.. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videskabernes Selskab, 310–343.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. (1974). The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox. Synthese 29 (1–4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallstrom, T. C. (1994). Inequivalence between the Schrödinger Equation and the Madelung Hydrodynamic Equations. Physical Review A 49, 1613–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weismann, A. (1892). Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Weisskopf, V. (1935). Probleme der neueren Quantentheorie des Elektrons. Die Naturwis-senschaften 23 (37–39), 631–637, 647–653, 669–674.Google Scholar

Weizsäcker, C. F. von (1931). Ortsbestimmung eines Elektrons durch ein Mikroskop. Zeitschrift für Physik 70 (1–2), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wentzel, G. (1926). Zwei Bemerkungen über die Zerstreuung korpuskularer Strahlen als Beugungserscheinung. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H., eds. (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B. (2004). The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-assessment. Foundations of Physics 34, 1305–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wick, G. C. (1935). Teoria dei raggi β e momento magnetico del protone. Rendiconti della Reale accademia nazionale dei Lincei 21, 170–173.Google Scholar

Wolfe, H. C. (1936). Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality. Physical Review 49, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar