Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:00:19.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

James M. Malcomson
Affiliation:
University of York
George A. Akerlof
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Janet L. Yellen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

This paper argues that contracts with payment based on a ranking of employee performance can provide performance incentives even under asymmetric information that prevents payment based on individual performance only being enforceable. Such contracts also fit with five features of labor markets that have aroused considerable interest: (1) hierarchical wage structures; (2) internal promotion; (3) wage rates that rise with seniority and experience more than productivity; (4) the variance of earnings increasing with experience; and (5) wage rates attached to jobs rather than individuals with differentials set by administrative procedures rather than by reference to external market wages.

Introduction

The literature on the principal-agent problem has been concerned with the nature of optimal contracts when there is difficulty in monitoring all aspects of an agent's performance. For the most part, this literature has considered models in which payment based directly on a measure of output provides an enforceable contract. For a recent example, see Grossman and Hart (1983). This requires that information about an agent's output be symmetric so that both parties know what payment is due under the contract and, at least in principle, could get that payment enforced legally if necessary. The output measure does not have to be perfect as long as neither party is in a position to impart a systematic bias to it. However, in many employment situations, information about an agent's output is asymmetric in the sense that the agent cannot verify the principal's observation of it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×