Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-92sl5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T12:33:42.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Beware of the libertarian wolf in the clothing of the egalitarian sheep: an essay on the need to clarify ends and means

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

By
Alan Maynard
Edited by
Di McIntyre  and
Gavin Mooney
Alan Maynard
Affiliation:
University of York, Department of Health Sciences Area 2, First Floor Seebohm Rowntree Building York YO10 5DD, UK
Di McIntyre
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Gavin Mooney
Affiliation:
Curtin University of Technology, Perth
Get access

Summary

Summary

Ideologies permeate policy debates in health care. However, they do so in an implicit manner and the combatants rarely reveal their underlying objectives. Typically, in both public and private health care systems, policy makers focus on expenditure control and efficiency, paying lip-service to equity issues. A focus on efficiency is clearly merited, as many health care interventions have no evidence base; there are large variations in clinical practice, which have been well evidenced and ignored for decades. Furthermore there is an absence of outcome measurement and evidence that consumers' health is improved by expensive health care systems.

Political frustration about the inefficiency of health care enables policy advocates holding competing libertarian and egalitarian perspectives to debate reform as if it were ideologically neutral. Libertarians seek economic and social structures that maximize individual freedom, minimize the role of government and ensure that health care is delivered by market-orientated insurers and providers. Egalitarians seek to maximize equality of opportunity. They regard government as a means by which the inequalities of market provision and finance can be reduced to provide real opportunities for all, and in particular the disadvantaged.

Reform debates in socialized health care systems are characterized by libertarians advocating reforms to increase individual freedom and undermine equality. In more libertarian systems, the egalitarians seek reforms to increase equality and circumscribe the freedom of the advantaged to experience better care. Rarely do the combatants reveal their ideological preferences. Egalitarians should beware libertarian wolves posing in sheep's clothing.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Economics of Health Equity , pp. 77 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Angell, M. (2004) The Truth about the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About it. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bloor, K. and Maynard, A. (2002) Consultants: managing them means measuring them. Health Service Journal. 112: 10–11.Google Scholar
BMJ Publishing Group (2005) Clinical Evidence Concise. (14)
Campbell, D. T. (1969) Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist. 24(4): 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DHSS (1976) The RAWP Report. Resource Allocation Working Party. Sharing Resources for Health in England. London: HMSO.
Donabedian, A. (1970) Social responsibility for personal health services: an examination of basic values. Inquiry. 8(2): 3–19.Google Scholar
Ellwood, P. M., Enthoven, A. C. and Etheredge, L. (1992) The Jackson hole initiatives for the twenty-first century American health care system. Health Economics. 1(3): 149–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuel, E. J. and Fuchs, V. R. (2005) Health care vouchers: a proposal for universal coverage. New England Journal of Medicine. 352: 1255–1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, J. G. (2005) The fetal origins hypothesis – 10 years on. British Medical Journal. 330: 1096–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R., Maynard, A., Preker, A. and Reinhardt, U. (1994) Health care reform. Health Economics. 3: 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, R. and Vujicic, M. (2005) Political wolves and economic sheep: the sustainability of public health insurance in Canada. In Maynard, A., ed., The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. pp. 117–140.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. S. (2003) Medical care: is more always better?New England Journal of Medicine. 349(17): 1665–1667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, M. (2000) The human capital model. In Culyer, A. J. and Newhouse, J., ed. Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1A, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Maynard, A. (2005) Healthcare lessons from Australia: what can Michael Howard learn from John Howard?British Medical Journal. 330: 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglehart, J. K., ed., (2004) Variations revisited. Health Affairs. supplement, web exclusive (7 October). http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.var.5/DC1.
Kerr, E. A., McGlynn, E. A., Adams, J., Keesey, J. and Asch, S. M. (2004) Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study. Health Affairs. 23(3): 247–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kind, P. and Williams, A. (2004) Measuring success in health care: the time has come to do it properly. Health Policy Matters. 9 www.york.ac.uk/healthsciences/pubs/hpmindex.htm.Google Scholar
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. and Donaldson, M. S., eds, (2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, A. (1997) Evidence based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices. Lancet. 349: 126–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, A., ed., The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. pp. 117–140.
Maynard, A. and Chalmers, I., eds, (1997) Non-Random Reflections on Health Services Research: on the 25th Anniversary of Archie Cochrane's Effectiveness and Efficiency. London: BMJ Publishing.Google Scholar
Maynard, A. and Sheldon, T. (2002) Funding for the National Health Service. Lancet. 360: 576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, A. and Bloor, K. (2006) Consultant clinical activity is key to improving productivity. Health Service Journal. 116: 18–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Maynard, A. and Street, A. (2006) Seven years of feast, seven years of famine: boom to bust in the NHS. British Medical Journal. 332: 906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, R. and Cassels, A. (2005) Selling Sickness: How Drug Companies Are Turning Us All Into Patients. Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Nightingale, F. (1863) Notes on Hospitals. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nolte, E. and McKee, M. (2004) Does Health Care Save Lives? Avoidable Mortality Revisited. London: Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, U. E. (1993) Comment on the Jackson Hole initiatives for the twenty-first century American care system. Health Economics. 2(1): 7–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, U. E. (2006) Uninsured Americans and the new Democratic Congress. British Medical Journal. 333: 1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochaix, L. and Hartmann, L. (2005) Public–private mix for health in France. In Maynard, A., ed., (2005) The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus Ca Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. p. 141Google Scholar
Schut, F. T. and Ven, W. P. M. M. (2005) Rationing and competition in the Dutch health care system. Health Economics. 14: S59–S74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, M., Davey-Smith, G. and Dorling, D. (2005) Health inequalities and New Labour: how promises compare with real progress. British Medical Journal. 330: 1016–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skrabanek, P. and McCormick, J. (1989) Follies and Fallacies in Medicine. Glasgow: Tarragon Press.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1974) Need as a demand concept (with special reference to health). In Culyer, A. J., ed., Economic Policies and Social Goals: Aspects of Public Choice. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1988) Priority setting in public and private health care: a guide through the ideological jungle. Journal of Health Economics. 7(2): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yi, Y., Maynard, A., Liu, G., Xiong, X. and Lin, F. (2005) Equity in health care financing: evaluation in the current urban employee health insurance reform in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 10(4): 506–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×