Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511257.003

3 - Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2009

Shareen Hertel and

Lanse Minkler

Wiktor Osiatyński

Show author details

Shareen Hertel: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Lanse Minkler: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Wiktor Osiatyński: Affiliation:
University Professor Central European, University in Budapest

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Social and economic rights are one of the most controversial issues in the theory and practice of rights. They are often referred to as the “rights of the second-generation” distinct from the “first-generation rights” that include civil liberties and political rights. However, the very category of social and economic rights is unclear and somewhat confused. Rights to own property and the freedom of enterprise are, in fact, basic freedoms rather than social rights: they empower an individual and limit the government's intrusion rather than suggest the government's benefits or regulation. Also a number of other social and economic rights resemble personal freedoms or political rights. It seems as if they were inserted into the category of “social and economic rights” primarily because there was no agreement on the immediate judicial enforcement of these rights.

However, even when we deal with social rights in a more narrow sense, we discover that they assume a very broad range of roles for the state. Free choice of employment and protection against unemployment (UDHR art. 23(1)) imply a protective role of the state. Many social rights call for a regulatory role of the state. Very few social rights demand direct provision of goods and services by the state. Finally, some social and economic rights deal with values and directives that can at best be the goal for social policy but they are to be implemented by nonstate actors or through international measures. There is much less confusion with the other categories of rights.

Type: Chapter
Information: Economic Rights
Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues
, pp. 56 - 75

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511257.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barry, Norman. 1990. Welfare. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Braybrooke, David. 1987. Meeting Needs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–172. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Drew. 1982. Basic Needs: Criterion for the Legitimacy of Development. In Human Rights in the Americas: The Struggle for Consensus, ed. Hennelly, Alfred and Langan, John, 245–88. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Copp, David. 1992. The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Justice, Autonomy, and the Basic Needs. In Economic Rights, ed. Frankel Paul, Ellen, Fred, D. Miller Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey, 231–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cranston, Maurice. 1973. What are Human Rights? New York: Taplinger.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1987. The Uncertain Quest for Welfare Rights. In Constitutionalism and Rights, ed. Gary, C. Bryner and Noel, B. Reynolds, 33–62. Provo: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1989. On the Nature and Value of Rights. In Philosophy of Human Rights, ed. Morton, E. Winston. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Gewirth, Alan. 1996. The Community of Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Golding, Martin P. 1978. The Concept of Rights: A Historical Sketch. In Bioethics and Human Rights, ed. Elsie, L. Bandman and Bandman, Bertram, 44–50. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Harvey, Philip. 2002. Human Rights and Economic Policy Discourse: Taking Economic and Social Rights Seriously. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 33 (2): 363–471.Google Scholar

Hayden, Patrick. 2001. The Philosophy of Human Rights. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Hennelly, Alfred S. J. and Langan, Johan S. J., eds. 1982. Human Rights in the Americas: The Struggle for Consensus. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. 1981. Economic-Social Rights as “Rights”: A United States Perspective. Human Rights Law Journal 2 (3–4).Google Scholar

Hollenbach, David. 1982. Global Human Rights: An Interpretation of the Contemporary Catholic Understanding. In Human Rights in the Americas: The Struggle for Consensus, ed. Hennelly, Alfred and Langan, John, 9–24. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Cass, R. Sunstein. 1999. The Costs of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, opened for signature Dec. 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. No. 16 at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 993 U.N.T.S. 3.

Ishay, Micheline R. 1997. The Human Rights Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jencks, Chrisopher. 2005. What Happened to Welfare? The New York Review of Books 52, no. 20 (December 15): 76–86.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Capabilities and Human Rights. In The Philosophy of Human Rights, ed. Hayden, Patrick, 212–40. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Osiatyński, Wiktor. 1996. Social and Economic Rights in a New Constitution for Poland. In Western Rights? A Post-Communist Application, ed. Andraś Sajó, , 233–69. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Osiatyński, Wiktor. 2000. Constitutionalism, Democracy, Constitutional Culture. In Constitutional Cultures, ed. Wyrzykowski, Miroslaw, 151–8. Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1952. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pollis, Adamantia. 2000. A New Universalism. In Human Rights: New Perspectives, New Realities, ed. Pollis, Adamantia and Schwab, Peter, 9–30. Bolder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Sachs, Albie. 2005. The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights: The Grootboom Case. In The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism, ed. Sajó, Andras and Uitz, Renate, 79–97. Utrecht: Eleven.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya Kumar. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Shue, Henry. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2004. The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Tesón, Fernando R. 2001. International Human Rights and Cultural Relativism. In The Philosophy of Human Rights, Patrick Hayden, 379–396. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Dijk, Pieter, and Godefridus, J. H. van Hoof. 1990. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.Google Scholar

Wieruszewski, Roman. 1998. The Evolution of the Socialist Concept of Human Rights. SIM Newsletter 1: 27–37.Google Scholar