Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abstracts
- List of abbreviations and acronyms
- Part I Concepts and measurements in innovation
- Part II Institutional and spatial aspects of information and knowledge flows
- 5 Tacit knowledge in production systems: how important is geography?
- 6 The self-aware firm: information needs, acquisition strategies, and utilization prospects
- 7 Theorizing the gendered institutional bases of innovative regional economies
- 8 Multinationals and transnational social space for learning: knowledge creation and transfer through global R&D networks
- 9 Brain circulation and regional innovation: the Silicon Valley–Hsinchu–Shanghai triangle
- Part III Institutions and innovation systems
- Index
- References
6 - The self-aware firm: information needs, acquisition strategies, and utilization prospects
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abstracts
- List of abbreviations and acronyms
- Part I Concepts and measurements in innovation
- Part II Institutional and spatial aspects of information and knowledge flows
- 5 Tacit knowledge in production systems: how important is geography?
- 6 The self-aware firm: information needs, acquisition strategies, and utilization prospects
- 7 Theorizing the gendered institutional bases of innovative regional economies
- 8 Multinationals and transnational social space for learning: knowledge creation and transfer through global R&D networks
- 9 Brain circulation and regional innovation: the Silicon Valley–Hsinchu–Shanghai triangle
- Part III Institutions and innovation systems
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Debate about the extent to which regions can foster innovation moves in two divergent directions. The first set of analysts takes a normative approach in suggesting what makes regions and firms competitive, innovative, and resilient. Their perspective draws largely on case studies of “successful” regions or firms where learning either occurs or is suboptimal (Lam 1997; Amin and Cohendet 1999; Capello 1999; Keeble and Wilkinson 1999; Lawson and Lorenz 1999; French 2000; Henry and Pinch 2000; Florida 2002; Lambooy, 2002; Storper 2002; and Gertler 2003a, 2003b). The second set of analysts' perspectives takes a positive approach to firm learning and investigates the practice of information acquisition, knowledge creation, and behavioral change in firms (Glasmeier 1991, 1999, 2001; Glasmeier et al. 1995; Feller, Glasmeier, and Marks 1996; Harrison and Glasmeier 1997; Glasmeier et al. 1998; Meeus, Oerlemans, and Boekema 2000; and Oerlemans, Meeus, and Boekema 2000). While the first set suggests that firms can and do act deliberately and with forethought, the second set suggests that firms are reactive, incremental, and myopic, and are motivated by factors that include life-style considerations rather than profit maximization.
The first type of investigation supports the belief that to be successful in the new economy, firms must have superior abilities to network, acquire new information, turn it into knowledge, learn from its internalization, and act upon it (Cooke 2002; Gertler and Wolfe 2002; Storper 2002).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Economic Geography of Innovation , pp. 112 - 128Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
and , 1999. “Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(1): 87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1999. “Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes,” Regional Studies, 33(4): 353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, P., 2002. “Regional Innovation Systems and Regional Competitiveness,” in and (eds.), Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change, London: Palgrave: 177–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , 1996. “Issues and Perspectives on Evaluating Manufacturing Modernization Programs,” Research Policy, 25(2): 309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, R., 2002. “The Learning Region,” in and (eds.), Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change, London: Palgrave: 117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 2000. “Re-Scaling the Economic Geography of Knowledge and Information: Constructing Life Assurance Markets,” Geoforum, 31: 101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1998. Networks, Location and Information Acquisition: An Analysis of Small Manufacturing Establishments, Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, unpublished dissertationGoogle Scholar
and , 2003. “Acquisition, Assessment and Use of Business Information by Small- and Medium-sized Businesses: A Demand Perspective,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(3): 229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M., 2003a. “A Cultural Economic Geography of Production: Are We Learning by Doing?,” in , , , and (eds.), Handbook of Cultural Geography, London: Sage: 131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003b. “Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There),” Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 75–99CrossRef
and , 2002. Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change, London: PalgraveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1991. “Technological Discontinuities and Flexible Production Networks: The Case of Switzerland and the World Watch Industry,”Research Policy, 21: 469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. “Territory-Based Regional Development Policy and Planning in a Learning Economy: The Case of ‘Real Service Centers’ in Industrial Districts,” European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1): 73–84CrossRef
2001. Manufacturing Time: Global Competition in the Watch Industry, 1795–2000, New York: Guilford Press
, , , and , 1998. “The Relevance of Firm Learning to the Design of Manufacturing Modernization Programs,” Economic Development Quarterly, 12(2): 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasmeier, A., A. Kays, J. Thompson, and R. Gurwitt, 1995. “Branch Plants and Rural Development in the Age of Globalization,” State Overview Series, Rural Economic Policy Program, The Aspen Institute, monograph
and , 1997. “Why Business Alone Won't Redevelop the Inner City: A Friendly Critique of Michael Porter's Approach to Urban Revitalization,” Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1): 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2000. “Spatializing Knowledge: Placing the Knowledge Community of Motor Sport Valley,” Geoforum, 31: 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 2004. Contrasts in Learning: The Social and Spatial Context of Learning in Innovative Firms, Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar
and , 1999. “Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe,” Regional Studies, 33(4): 295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1997, “Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Collaborative Ventures,” Organization Studies, 18(6): 973–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 2002. “Knowledge and Urban Economic Development: An Evolutionary Perspective,”Urban Studies, 39(5–6): 1019–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , 1999. “Collective Learning: Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity,” Regional Studies, 33(4): 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , 2002. “The Elusive Conception of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering,” Environment and Planning A, 34(3): 429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeus, M. T., L. A. Oerlemans, and F. W. Boekema, 2000. “Innovation and Proximity: Theoretical Perspectives,” in and (eds.), Industrial Networks and Proximity, London: Ashgate: 17–46Google Scholar
Oerlemans, L., M. Meeus, and F. Boekema, 2000. “Learning, Innovation, and Proximity: An Empirical Exploration of Patterns of Learning: A Case Study,” in , , , and , (eds.), Knowledge, Innovation, and Economic Growth: The Theory and Practice of Learning Regions, London: Edward Elgar: 137–165Google Scholar
Storper, M., 2002. “Institutions and the Learning Economy,” in and (eds.), Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change, London: Palgrave: 177–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar