Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:58:33.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Is deposit insurance inevitable? – lessons from Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Jagdeep S. Bhandari
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University, Texas
Alan O. Sykes
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the decision by the Argentine government to abolish deposit insurance, and its subsequent decision to reestablish a form of deposit insurance. Prior to 1991, the Argentine banking system operated under a regime of optional, explicit deposit insurance, coupled with extensive implicit deposit insurance in the form of central bank assistance to failing banks. In 1991 and 1992, Argentina reversed this policy by repealing the country's deposit insurance program and attempting to convince financial markets that it would not under any circumstances rescue a failing bank. In 1995, in the face of a forthcoming election and a severe economic crisis sparked by the Mexican peso devaluation of December 1994, the Argentine government reinstituted a form of deposit insurance in an effort to stave off an all out bank panic. The decision to reestablish deposit insurance appears inconsistent with repeated assurances from high-level officials to the effect that the Argentine government would not under any circumstances bail out depositors in a failing bank.

Beginning in December 1994, Argentina's banking system entered a major period of instability triggered by the peso devaluation and subsequent economic crisis in Mexico – the so-called tequila effect in which the Mexican problems spread out to other countries in the region and even elsewhere in the developing world.

The connections between the Mexican crisis and the loss of investor confidence in Argentina are somewhat difficult to determine.

Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Dimensions in International Law
Comparative and Empirical Perspectives
, pp. 392 - 404
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×