Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T01:03:41.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Economic and Financial Sanctions under International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2025

Caf Dowlah
Caf Dowlah
Affiliation:
University of Miami Law School
Get access

Summary

This chapter intricately examines the interplay between economic and financial sanctions and international law. It dissects multilateral and unilateral sanctions, outlining their legal parameters. Analyzing the delicate balance between these approaches, the chapter explores state sovereignty, non-intervention, countermeasures, and countersanctions. It navigates the complex realm of judicial proceedings within third-party countermeasures. Additionally, the chapter scrutinizes the connection between unilateral sanctions and the World Trade Organization framework, delves into the interaction of sanctions with human rights laws, and addresses how courts address the intricate juncture between sanctions and human rights within the broader international legal context.

Keywords

Sanctions and International lawCountermeasures and countersanctionsSanctions and WTO trading systemSanctions and human rights
Type
Chapter
Information
Economic and Financial Sanctions of the United States
Legal Perspectives
 , pp. 28 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albal, E. 2021. Evaluating Sanctions in the Context of International Law. Peace Review, 33 (1):131–139.Google Scholar
Alford, R. 2011. The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception. Utah Law Review, 2011:697–698.Google Scholar
Asada, M. 2020. Definition and Legal Justification of Sanctions. In Asada, M. (ed.), Economic Sanctions in International Law and Practice, pp. 3–23. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ashley, L. 2021. Unilateral Coercive Measures: Towards International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights. In Subedi, S. (ed.), Unilateral Sanctions in International Law, pp. 233–254. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Balan, G. 2013. The Latest United States Sanctions against Iran: What Role to the WTO Security Exceptions. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 18(3):365–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. 2003. Prologomena to Thinking about Economic Sanctions and Free Trade. Chicago Journal of International Law, 4(2):272–281.Google Scholar
Beucillon, C. 2021. Introduction. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 1–18. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blum, Y. 1977. Economic Boycotts in International Law. Texas International Law Journal, 12:5–15.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, I. 2021. Targeted Economic Sanctions and WTO Law: Examining the Adequacy of the National Security Exception. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 48(2):171–200.Google Scholar
Bothe, M. 2016. Compatibility and Legitimacy of Sanctions Regimes. In Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law, pp. 33–42. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutros-Ghali, B. 1995. An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Briggs, H. 1971. Barcelona Traction: The Jus Standi of Belgium. American Journal of International Law, 65(2):327–345.Google Scholar
Bring, O. 2000. The Westphalian Peace Tradition in International Law – From Jus ad Bellum to Jus contra Bellum. International Law Studies, 75:57–80.Google Scholar
Browne, R. 1997. Revisiting “National Security” in an Interdependent World: The GATT Article XXI Defense after Helms-Burton. Georgetown Law Journal, 86(2):405–433.Google Scholar
Carter, B. 1987. International Economic Sanctions: Improving the Haphazard U.S. Legal Regime. California Law Review, 75:1159–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, B., and Farha, R. 2013. Overview and Operation of U.S. Financial Sanctions, Including the Example of Iran. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 44(3):903–914.Google Scholar
Chercheneff, L. 2021. Challenging Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions under International Economic Law: Exploring Leads at the WTO and the OECD. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 239–256. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chopra, J., and Weiss, T.. 1992. Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct: Codifying Humanitarian Intervention. Ethics and International Affairs, 6:95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. 2001. The International Law Commission’s Articles of State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. 2013. State Responsibility – The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damrosch, L. 2019. The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions as Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts. Ecology Law Quarterly, 46:95–111.Google Scholar
Damrosch, L., and Scheffer, D. (Eds.). (1991). Law and Force in the New International Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Danchin, P. 2009. Whose Public? Which Law? Mapping the Internal/External Distinction in International Law. In Farrell, J., and Rubenstein, K. (eds.), Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalized World, pp. 27–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., and Ness, I.. 2021. Introduction: Why Are Economic Sanctions a Form of War? In Davis, S., and Ness, I. (eds.), Sanctions as War: Anti-imperialist Perspectives on American Geo-economic Strategy, pp. 1–24. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, M. 2017a. Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawidowicz, M. 2017b. Third-Party Countermeasures and the ICJ. In Dawidowicz, M., Third Party Countermeasures in International Law, pp. 36–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
deWet, E. 2013. From Kadi to Nada: Judicial Techniques Favoring Human Rights over United Nations Security Council Sanctions. Chinese Journal of International Law, 12:787–807.Google Scholar
Dolzer, R., and Schreuer, C.. 2012. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowlah, C. 2004. Backwaters of Global Prosperity: How Globalization and the GATT/WTO Trade Regimes Marginalize the World’s Poorest Nations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Doxey, M. 1996. International Sanctions in Contemporary Perspective. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Dupont, P. 2012. Countermeasures and Collective Security. The Case of EU Sanctions against Iran. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17(3):301–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, S. 2016. Extraterritorial Economic Sanctions and Their Foundation in International Law. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 33(3):632–660.Google Scholar
Fabri, H. 2008. Human Rights and State Sovereignty: Have the Boundaries Been Significantly Redrawn? In P. Alston, and E. Macdonald (eds.), Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force, pp. 33–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrall, J. 2007. United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law. 1st ed. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geiss, R. 2005. Humanitarian Safeguards in Economic Sanctions Regimes: A Call for Automatic Suspension Clauses, Periodic Monitoring, and Follow-Up Assessment of Long-Term Effects. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 18(2005):167–200.Google Scholar
Gestri, M. 2016. Sanctions Imposed by the European Union: Legal and Institutional Aspects. In Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law, pp. 70–102. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gibney, M. 2022. The Historical Development of Extraterritorial Obligations. In Gibney, M. et al. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations, pp. 13–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giumelli, F. 2016. From Effective to Useful Sanctions: Lessons Learned from the Experience of the European Union. Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law. In Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law, pp. 246–269. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Z., and Lindblom, A.. 2021. The US Position and Practice with regards to Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions: Reimagining the US Sanctions Regime in a World of Advanced Technology. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 130–148. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. 2010. Invisible War: The United states and the Iraq Sanctions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. 2019. The Not So Targeted Instrument of Asset Freezes. Ethics and International Affairs, 33(3):303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, J. et al. 2018. Economic Sanctions and Human Rights: Quantifying the Legal Proportionality Principle. Research Papers in Economics, No. 2/18. Universität Trier, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happold, M. 2017. UN Sanctions as Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Devices. In Herrick, L. (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law, pp. 122–140. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Happold, M., and Eden, P.. 2016. Economic Sanctions and International Law: An Introduction. In Happold, M., and Eden, P. (eds.), Economic Sanctions and International Law, pp. 1–12. University of Luxemburg.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1986. Legality of Economic Sanctions under International Law: The Case of Nicaragua. Washington and Lee Law Review, 986(43):167–196.Google Scholar
Hestermeyer, H. 2011. Art XXI: Security Exceptions. In Wolfrum, R. et al. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Goods, pp. 571–686. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hofer, A. 2017. The Developed/Developing Divide on Unilateral Coercive Measures: Legitimate Enforcement or Illegitimate Intervention. Chinese Journal of International Law, 16(2):175–214.Google Scholar
Hofer, A. 2021. Unilateral Sanctions as a Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 186–204. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hovell, D. 2016. Due Process in the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 110(1):1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, D. 2019. Symposium on Unilateral Targeted Sanctions. Unfinished Business of International Law: The Questionable Legality of Autonomous Sanctions. American Journal of International Law, 113:140–145.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. et al. 2007. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. Washington, DC: Patterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
ICJ (International Court of Justice). 1986. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) [1986] ICJ Rep 14 [222].Google Scholar
ILC (International Law Commission). 2001. Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Ilieva, J., Dashtevski, A.., and Kokotovic, F.. 2018. Economic Sanctions in International Law. UTMS Journal of Economics, 9(2):201–211.Google Scholar
Jamnejad, M., and Wood, M.. 2009. The Principle of Non-intervention. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22(2):345–381.Google Scholar
Joyner, D. 2015. International Legal Limits on the Ability of States to Lawfully Impose International Economic/Financial Sanctions. In Marossi, A., and Bassett, M. (eds.), Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy and Consequences, pp. 83–93. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, D. 2017. UN Counter-Proliferation Sanctions and International Law. In Herik, L. (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law, pp. 110–121. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1950. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kuyper, P. 1990. International Legal Aspects of Economic Sanctions. In Sarcevic, P., and Houtte, H. (eds.), Legal Issues in International Trade. London: Graham & Trotman.Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V. 2016. Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility. London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
LaRae-Perez, C. 2002. Economic Sanctions as Use of Force: Re-evaluating the Legality of Sanctions from an Effects-Based Perspective. Boston University International Law Journal, 20(1):161–188.Google Scholar
Liou, R., Amanda, M., and Peksen, D.. 2021. Revisiting the Causal Links between Economic Sanctions and Human Rights Violations. Political Research Quarterly, 74(4):808–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, G, and Cortright, D.. 1995. The Sanctions Era: An Alternative to Military Intervention. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 19(2):65–86.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. 2003. Trade Controls for Political Ends: Four Perspectives. Chicago Journal of International Law, 4(2):354–369.Google Scholar
Mallard, G., and Hanson, A.. 2021. Embedded Extraterritoriality: US Judicial Litigation and the Global Banking Surveillance of Digital Money Flows. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 270–287. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Menkes, J., and Kociołek-Pęksa, A.. 2019. Heterogeneity, Compliance and Enforcement of Public International Law Remarks on Sanctions and Countermeasures. Politeja, 63:7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. 2009. Second Thoughts on Secondary Sanctions. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 30(3):905–934.Google Scholar
Michaelsen, C. 2014. Human Rights as Limits for the Security Council: A Matter of Substantive Law or Defining the Application of Proportionality? Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 19(3):451–469.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M. 2011. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. 2017. Sanctions and the World Trade Organization. In Herik, L. (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law, pp. 283–303. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Mohamad, R. 2015. Unilateral Sanctions in International Law: A Quest for Legality. In Marossi, A., and Bassett, M (eds.), Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy and Consequences, pp. 71–81. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moiseienko, A. 2021. Due Process and Unilateral Targeted Sanctions. In Beucillon, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions, pp. 405–423. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Murrill, B. 2018. The National Security Exception and the World Trade Organization. Congressional Research Services. LSB10223. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nasu, H. (2013). Revisiting the Principle of Non-Intervention: A Structural Principle of International Law or a Political Obstacle to Regional Security in Asia? Asian Journal of International Law, 3(1):25–50.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. 2002. Debating the Law of Sanctions. European Journal of International Law, 13:63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offut, M. 1928. The Protection of Citizens Abroad by the United States. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Oosthuizen, G. 1999. Playing the Devil’s Advocate: The United Nations Security Council Is Unbound by Law. Leiden Journal of International law, 12(3):549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, M. 2012. The Limits of Economic Sanctions under International Humanitarian Law: The Case of the Congo. Texas International Law Journal, 48:103–112.Google Scholar
Peksen, D. 2009. Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights. Journal of Peace Research, 46(1):59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, R. 1992. Starvation as a Weapon: Legal Implications of the United Nations Food Blockade against Iraq and Kuwait. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 30:577–616.Google Scholar
Reinisch, W. 2001. Developing Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Accountability of the Security Council for the Imposition of Economic Sanctions. American Journal of International Law, 95(4):851–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W., and Stevick, D. 1998. The Applicability of International Law Standards to United Nations Economic Sanctions Programs. European Journal of International Law 9:86–141.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, N. 2016. Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An International Law Perspective. In Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law, pp. 1–32. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ruys, T. 2017. Sanctions, Retortions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework. In Herik, L. (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law, pp. 19–51. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sampford, C. 2010. The Potential for a Post-Westphalian Convergence of “Public Law” and “Public International Law.” In Farrall, J., and Rubenstein, K. (eds.), Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalized World, pp. 53–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sampford, C., and Parker, C.. 1995. Legal Ethics: Legal Regulation, Ethical Standard Setting and Institutional Design. In C. Parker, and C. Sampford (eds.), Legal Ethics and Legal Practice: Contemporary Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schechla, J. 2022. Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations in the Context of Economic Sanctions. In Gibney, M., ed., The Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schloemann, H., and Ohlhoff, S.. 1999. “Constitutionalization” and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence. American Journal of International Law, 93(2):424–451.Google Scholar
Segall, A. 1999. Economic Sanctions: Legal and Policy Constraints. International Review of the Red Cross, No. 836.Google Scholar
Shagabutdinova, E., and Berejikian, J.. 2007. Deploying Sanctions while Protecting Human Rights: Are Humanitarian “Smart” Sanctions Effective? Journal of Human Rights, 6(1):59–74.Google Scholar
Skogly, S., and Gibney, M.. 2022. Global Human Rights Obligations. In Gibney, M. et al. (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations, pp. 25–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smeets, M. 2000. Conflicting Goals: Economic Sanctions and the WTO. Global Dialogue, 2(3):119–128.Google Scholar
Sossai, M. 2020. Legality of Extraterritorial Sanctions. In Asada, M. (ed.), Economic Sanctions in International Law and Practice, pp. 62–80. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Subedi, S. 2021. The Status of Unilateral Sanctions in International Law. In Subedi, S. (ed.), Unilateral Sanctions in International Law, pp. 19–60. Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swindells, F. 1996. UN Sanctions in Haiti: A Contradiction under Articles 41 and 55 of the UN Charter. Fordham International Law Journal, 20(5):1880–1959.Google Scholar
Tams, C., and Tzanakopoulos, A.. 2010. Barcelona Traction at 40: The ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development. Leiden Journal of International Law, 23(4):781–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, A. 2010. Remarks on Sovereignty in the Evolving Constitutional Features of the International Community. In M. Arsanjani et al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman, pp. 299–322. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., and Thouvenin, J. (Eds.). 2005. The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order. Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Turkelli, G. 2022. Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations and Responsibility under International Law. In Gibney, M. et al. (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations, pp. 40–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
UNHRC (United Nations Human Rights Council). 2014. Human Rights and Unilateral Coercive Measures. UNHRC Resolution (03 October 2014). A/HRC/RES/27/21.Google Scholar
Vazquez, C. 2003. Trade Sanctions and Human Rights – Past, Present, and Future. Journal of International Economic Law, 6(4):797–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R., and Mendlovitz, S. (Eds.). 1990. Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Communities. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N. 2017. Autonomous and Collective Sanctions in the International Legal Order. Italian Year Book of International Law, 27(2017):3–24.Google Scholar
White, N., and Abass, A.. 2018. Countermeasures and Sanctions. In Evans, M. (ed.), International Law. 5th ed., pp. 521–547. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×