Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:13:07.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

James M. Bullock
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK
William J. Sutherland
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Seeds and phytoplankton can be extremely mobile, but usually we are interested in surveying plants that cannot move. Sessile plants are usually arranged over a substrate (soil, sediment, etc.) and can be found, identified and examined at leisure. This characteristic means that, in many ways, it is much easier to census plants than it is to census other organisms and estimates of, e.g., density, species number and composition and distribution of a species are more accurate for plants. A second characteristic of plants, however, causes problems in deciding how best to characterise the abundance of species. Plant species, and even individuals within a species, in a community can differ enormously in size. An English wood may contain oak trees 30 m tall and with a canopy diameter of 40 m, in contrast to herbs, grasses and oak seedlings in the understorey, which are only a few centimetres in height. Even in a grassland where all plants are a few centimetres tall, there will be huge differences in the horizontal spread of individuals, from a few millimetres to several metres. While the standard measure of abundance of animals, a count of individuals, can be used for plants, this variety in plant size will mean that counts ignore a large amount of information about the community. For instance, there may be equal numbers of individuals of two species in your study area but the species with a larger average size will have a greater importance for the ecological processes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Census Techniques
A Handbook
, pp. 186 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, M. P. & Heyligers, P. C. (1989). Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Biological Conservation 50, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakenhielm, S. & Liu, Q. H. (1995). Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 79, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. B. (2002). Introduction to Remote Sensing. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Dessaint, F., Barralis, G., Caixinhas, M. L.et al. (1996). Precision of soil seedbank sampling: how many soil cores?Weed Research 36, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominy, N. J. & Duncan, B. (2002). GPS and GIS methods in an African rain forest: applications to tropical ecology and conservation. Conservation Ecology 5, article no. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etchberger, R. C. & Krausman, P. R. (1997). Evaluation of five methods for measuring desert vegetation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 604–609.Google Scholar
HMSO (1984). Sampling of Non-planktonic Algae (Benthic Algae or Periphyton). London, Her Majesty's Staitionary Office.
HMSO (1990). The Enumeration of Algae, Estimation of Cell Volume and Use in Bioassays. London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
Hotzel, G. & Croome, R. (1999). A phytoplankton methods manual for Australian freshwaters. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 22/99.
Jager, P., Pall, K., & Dumfarth, E. (2004). A method of mapping macrophytes in large lakes with regard to the requirements of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis. London, Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Kercher, S. M., Frieswyk, C. B., & Zedler, J. B. (2003). Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, M. E. & Staden, J. (2004). The potential of smoke in seed technology. South African Journal of Botany 70, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W. & Chipman, J. (2003). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. G. & Rogers, S. J. (1998). The aquatic macrophyte seed bank in Lake Onalaska, Wisconsin. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 36, 33–39.Google Scholar
Mehner, H., Cutler, M., Fairbairn, D. & Thompson, G. (2004). Remote sensing of upland vegetation: the potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. W., Aronson, R. B. & Murdoch, T. J. T. (2003). Monitoring coral reef macroalgae: different pictures from different methods. Bulletin of Marine Science 72, 199–206.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. A., Lebrocque, A. F. & Clarke, P. J. (1995). An assessment of some improved techniques for estimating the abundance (frequency) of sedentary organisms. Vegetatio 120, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, F. M. (1978). Seedlings of the North-Western European Lowland. The Hague, Dr W. Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, M. A., Wample, R., Greene, S. & Tarara, J. (2004). Nondestructive measurement of vegetative cover using digital image analysis. Hortscience 39, 55–59.Google Scholar
Paine, D. P. (2003). Aerial Photography and Image Interpretation. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Porter, S. D., Cuffney, T. F., Gurtz, M. E. & Meador, M. R. (1993). Methods for collecting alga samples as part of the National Water Quality Assessment Program. Open File Report 93–409. Raleigh, NC, US Geological Survey.
Rodwell, J. S. (1998). British Plant Communities: Volume 1. Woodland and Scrub. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandmann, H. & Lertzman, K. P. (2003). Combining high-resolution aerial photography with gradient-directed transects to guide field sampling and forest mapping in mountainous terrain. Forest Science 49, 429–443.Google Scholar
Schmidtlein, S. & Sassin, J. (2004). Mapping of continuous floristic gradients in grasslands using hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. A., Adamson, J. K., Rollinson, J. & Parr, T. W. (2002). Monitoring of aquatic macrophytes for detection of long-term change in river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 73, 131–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stieglitz, T. & Ridd, P. V. (2001). Trapping of mangrove propagules due to density-driven secondary circulation in the Normanby River estuary, NE Australia. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 211, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heerdt, G. N. J., Verweij, G. L., Bekker, R. M. & Bakker, J. P. (1996). An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Functional Ecology 10, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. B. & Morrison, J. R. (1987). ADAS Colour Atlas of Weed Seedlings. London, Wolfe Publishing.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Plants
    • By James M. Bullock, NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Plants
    • By James M. Bullock, NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Plants
    • By James M. Bullock, NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.005
Available formats
×