Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:15:12.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Female and Male Sterilization

from Section 4 - Contraception and STIs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Female and male sterilization is an important and widely used method of contraception. While a safe and effective procedure, given its permanent nature care has to be taken when counselling men and women for this procedure to reduce the incidence of regret and reversal. Detailed discussion with both sexes regarding the risks of sterilization procedures and of alternative methods of contraception, such as long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), is vital to allow fully informed consent. Laparoscopic sterilization is a popular method of female sterilization and is associated with low complication rates. Minimally invasive vasectomy (MIV), performed under local anaesthetic in the outpatient setting, is becoming the gold standard technique for male sterilization and results in fewer operative complications and less postoperative pain than more traditional methods. Hopefully further research into hysteroscopic sterilization techniques will allow this to become a more accessible and safer method of permanent contraception for women.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FSRH Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Male and Female Sterilisation. London: Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2014.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Long-acting reversible contraception. Clinical guideline 30. 2005.Google Scholar
Melville, C, Bigrigg, A. Male and female sterilisation. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 2008;18:330334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayaraman, S, Mann, M. Male and female sterilisation. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 2012;22:8591.Google Scholar
McKay, R, Schunmann, C. Male and female sterilisation. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 2017;27:373378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Onstetricians and Gynaecologists. Laparoscopic injuries. Green-top Guideline No. 49. 2008.Google Scholar
Murthy, P, Edwards, J, Pathak, M. Update on hysteroscopic sterilisation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;19:227235.Google Scholar
Duffy, S, Marsh, F, Rogerson, L, et al. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation. BJOG 2005;112:15221528.Google Scholar
Madari, S, Varma, R, Gupta, J. A comparison of the modified Pomeroy tubal ligation and Filshie clips for immediate postpartum sterilisation: a systematic review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16:341349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, MS, DiNapoli, MN, Westhoff, CL. Reducing postoperative pain after tubal ligation with rings or clips: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:6875.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:11611168.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Jeng, G, Folger, SG, et al. The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization: US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:16811687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, SD, Marchbanks, PA, Tylor, LR, Peterson, HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:889895.Google ScholarPubMed
Brechin, S, Birgrigg, A. Male and female sterilisation. Curr Obstet Gynecol 2003;13:3844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohle, GR, Dierner, T, Kopa, Z, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol 2002;61:159163.Google Scholar
Li, SQ, Goldstein, M, Zhu, J, Huber, D. The no-scalpel vasectomy. J Urol 1991;145:341344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×